e r i ng & g in bi ledesma-carrión bioengineer …...ledesma-carrión bioengineer biomedical...
TRANSCRIPT
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • 1000189J Bioengineer & Biomedical SciISSN:2155-9538 JBBS an open access journal
Research Article Open Access
Journal of Bioengineering & Biomedical Science
Ledesma-Carrión, J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 2016, 6:3 DOI: 10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Jour
nal o
f Bioe
ngineering & Biomedical Science
ISSN: 2155-9538
*Corresponding author: Dora E. Ledesma-Carrión, National Institute of Statistic andGeography, C.P. 03730 Delg, Benito Juárez, Mexico, Tel: 525552781000; E-mail:[email protected]
Received: May 04, 2016; Accepted: May 19, 2016; Published: May 30, 2016
Citation: Ledesma-Carrión DE (2016) Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- Hydroxyapatite. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 6: 189. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Copyright: © 2016 Ledesma-Carrión DE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
AbstractThe main bone substitute is hydroxyapatite either mineral or synthetic. Synthetic hydroxyapatite is produced by
various methods such as, sol-gel, mechanochemical, hydrothermal, sonochemical, ceramic (wet and dry roads, routes through cements of calcium phosphates and route using emulsions-microemulsions), and hydrolysis. Hydroxyapatite obtained by wet via has features from micro to nano. It has been reported that adding titania mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite improve. In this study only the experimental evidence is presented. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of anatase in synthetic hydroxyapatite obtained by co-precipitators. Powders were subjected to uniaxial and isostatic cold pressing to form pills. Later pills were sintered. The characterization of the material includes several techniques. It was compared with each of the different percentages of anatase 0.1, 1.5, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10. The results show the existence of an optimum percentage by which the mechanical properties surpass others, maximum of hardness before immersed it in simulated body fluid with 7%. The explanation of this optimum is the presence of calcium titanate because of titania diffuses efficiently in the network hydroxyapatite.
Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- HydroxyapatiteDora E. Ledesma-Carrión*National Institute of Statistic and Geography, C.P. 03730 Delg, Benito Juárez, Mexico
Keywords: Bond; Nanostructure; Hydroxyapatite; Characterization;Particle size; Anatase; Hardness
Abbreviations: SEM-EDS: Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy;SEM-HR: Scanning Electron Microscopy of High-resolution; TEM-HR: Transmission Electron Microscopy of High-resolution; TEM: Transmission Electron Microscopy; TGA: Thermogravimetric Analysis; DSC: Differential Scanning Calorimetry; BET: Surface adsorption tests due to Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) Theory; BJH: Surface Adsorption tests due to Barrett-Joyner-Halenda; SBF: Simulated Body Fluid; UP: Uniaxial Pressure; CIP: Cold Isostatic Pressure; FT-IR: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy; XPS: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; XDR: X-ray Diffraction; HA:Hydroxyapatite; HA sc: Hydroxyapatite Powder without HeatTreatment; HA cc: Hydroxyapatite Powder with Heat Treatment; Ar:Argon; HA90cc: 90%HAcc+10%TiO2; HA93cc: 93%HAcc+7%TiO2;HA95cc: 95%HAcc+5%TiO2; HA97cc: 97%HAcc+3%TiO2; HA99cc:99%HAcc+1%TiO2; HA99.9cc: 99.9%HAcc+0.1%TiO2
IntroductionStudies have shown that microcrystalline HA is known as a
substitute "good-builder" with higher calcium absorption. It is a charge of second-generation calcium derived from bovine bone. And it is more effective than calcium carbonate in slow bone loss [1,2].
The composition of the mineral HA stoichiometric be expressed as Ca10 (PO4) 6 (OH) 2 with a Ca / P = 1.67 relationship, while the HA deficient in calcium (CDHA) is CA9 (HPO4) (PO4) 5 (OH), with Ca / P = 1.50. The latter is the one that is considered the most similar to human bones [3].
Biocompatibility tests [4,5] natural HA (bovine base) and titanium dioxide show regeneration and capillarity after a few weeks.
Nanometric and stoichiometric hydroxyapatite was prepared by wet via [6]. Later, TiO2 anatase was added. The analysis was made on powder with heat treatment at 680°C in Ar atmosphere (HA cc) and pills. The powders were subjected to UP and CIP to form pills [7]. The pills %HAcc+%TiO2 were sintered at 850°C. HA cc and TiO2 median size were 175.9 and 293.6 nm, respectively. Using other technique, Kumar et al. [8] reported hardness and elasticity of 15.1 and 0.405 GPa by nano-indentation for a load of 100 mN over a coating of subsequent layers of %HA%TiO2 (25%HA75%TiO2, 50%HA50%TiO2,
75%HA25%TiO2 and HA). These layers were sintered at 900°C during a few minutes with functionally graded successfully. Before, HA was calcined at 800°C for 2 h. HA and TiO2 median size are 7.46 and 1.37 µm, respectively.
Fidancevska et al. [9] mixed HA and titanium powder to produce porous bionert-bioactive composite ceramic and reported an optimum value at 15wt. % of TiO2 but at 20wt. % the Young modulus decreased, the median size HA was 5 µm. This was the first evidence of an optimum value at micrometer particles.
Materials and MethodsThe characterization of the material includes SEM-HR, TEM,
TEM-HR, FTIR, Raman, TGA / DSC, XRD, BET / BJH, XPS, nano-indentation and Z-sizer.
Figures 1 and 2a show anatase and rutile phases of TiO2 and amorphous and crystalline HA sc in air, therefore inert atmosphere (Ar) must be used and not exceed the heat treatment of 680°C and sintering of 850°C. Upon heating in air, phosphates and carbonates appear in HA sc at 980°C and 630°C, respectively, Figure 2b. Thus, to obtain calcium titanate instead of calcium carbonate should control the rate of calcination and the atmosphere.
Micrographs increased x75000, SEM 10KV and 93.3pA. PANalytical XPert PRO (45KV, 40mA) was used. XPS k-alpha: Al-Kα 1486.6 eV and 10-8 mbars. Raman at 633 cm-1. UP No. 714987 RAM DIA 600. Dade diameter was 1cm of steel 316L. CIP was made with a Yuken Model 334 press applied 400MPa during one cycle of four steps: Step 1: 0-100MPa, step 2: 101-200MPa, step 3: 201-300MPa and step 4:
Citation: Ledesma-Carrión DE (2016) Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- Hydroxyapatite. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 6: 189. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Page 2 of 7
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • 1000189J Bioengineer & Biomedical SciISSN:2155-9538 JBBS an open access journal
301-400MPa. Time of step is 30 seconds. After the pills were sintered at 850°C in Ar atmosphere since 500°C during 1hr, heat up slop 5°C /min and heat slope down 6°C /min. Fourteen zones were studied for each pill after immerged in SBF. The SBF was made following the method of Oyane et al. [10].
Results and DiscussionFigure 3 show TGA curves for different percentages of anatase. For
HA95cc is observed the lower area of carbonates and for most HA90cc. Comparing heat capacities, Cp´s for %HAcc + %TiO2 are showed in Figure 4. The Cp´s for HA95cc are analogous to that of anatase in the
following ranges: (751.717°C, 833.001°C; Cp = 0.389853 J Jg−1°C−1), (968.258°C, 1107.09°C; Cp = 0.400155 Jg−1°C−1) and (1276.49°C, 1445.88°C; Cp = 0.410457 Jg−1°C−1). X-ray diffraction patterns do not present CaO, see Figures 5 and 6, but show titanato ion, TiO-3
2. The peak area is significant from HA95cc up to HA90cc.
To verify pore size in a nanometer range in Figure 7 and Tables 1 and 2 appear Nitrogen-Adsorption-desorption (BET/BJH) tests. Those showed mesoporosity with a maximum area reduction of 8.93% and maximum pore radii of 1.88 nm for HA95.
And particles average size distribution, Figure 8 shows that for anatase is 294nm, HAcc is 175.9nm, HA95cc is 293.6nm and HA90cc is 206.4nm. The 2-modal distribution for HA95cc is evidence of the spread of titania in the HAcc. The tetragonal crystalline structure of HA95cc and HA90cc is observed in the Figure 9. The anatase structure is tetragonal and HAcc is hexagonal, Figure 10, is expected that %HAcc+%TiO2 are tetragonal. The morphology change is followed in Figure 11. The anatase into “balls” surrounding the cylindrical bars HAcc. This balance is in HA95cc and HA93cc.
Raman spectra show titanate ion together υ3 anatase, and characteristic picks HAcc, Figure 12. TiO2 [11,12] υ1 absorption band appears at 600-700cm−1 and 525-460cm−1. υ2 band is at 380-329cm−1
TEMPERATURE (°C)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
WE
IGH
T (
%)
90
92
94
96
98
100
HE
AT
FL
UX
(W
/g)
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
water
TiO2
anatase
rutile
Figure 1: TGA/DSC test: Phases of TiO2, anatase and rutile, are observed at 480°C and 580°C, respectively.Figure 1: TGA/DSC test: Phases of TiO2, anatase and rutile, are observed at
480°C and 580°C, respectively.
TEMPERATURE (°C)0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
WE
IGH
T (%
)
92
94
96
98
100
HE
AT
FL
UX
(W/g
)
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
water
HA sc amorphous
HAsc crystalline formation
HA WITHOUT HEAT TREATMENT (HA sc)
Figure 2: TGA/DSC test: a) HAsc begins to crystallize at 475°C and b) HAcc which one is crystalline and break down in carbonates and
phosphates at 700°C and 900°C, respectively.
100.0
99.5
99.0
98.5
98.0
97.5
97.0
96.50 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
8
6
4
2
0
TEMPERATURE (°C)
HE
AT
FL
UX
(W
/g)
WE
IGH
T (
%)
HA WITH HEAT TREATMENT (HAcc)
phosphates
carbonates
Figure 2: TGA/DSC test: a) HAsc begins to crystallize at 475°C and b) HAcc which one is crystalline and break down in carbonates and phosphates at 700°C and 900°C, respectively.
TiO2 HA cc HA 99 cc
HA 95 cc HA 90 cc
TGA %HA + %TiO2
HA 99 cc
Titanates
Carbonates
Phosphates
HA 90 cc
HA cc
HA 95 cc
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
TiO2
TiO2
Temperature [°C]
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Hea
t Flo
wer
(W/g
)
Figure 3: TGA tests %HAcc + %TiO2 show same carbonate and phos-phates zones for each percentage of dioxide of titanium.
Figure 3: TGA tests %HAcc + %TiO2 show same carbonate and phosphates zones for each percentage of dioxide of titanium.
Figure 4: %HAcc + %TiO2 calorific capacities, Cps, show similar values into some ranges with anatase.
0.525
0.475
0.425
0.375
0.325
0.27550 250 450 650 850 1050 1250 1450 1650
T (°C)
Cp (J
g-1o C
-1) HA95cc
HA90cc
HAcc
TiO2
Figure 4: %HAcc + %TiO2 calorific capacities, Cps, show similar values into some ranges with anatase.
Citation: Ledesma-Carrión DE (2016) Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- Hydroxyapatite. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 6: 189. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Page 3 of 7
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • 1000189J Bioengineer & Biomedical SciISSN:2155-9538 JBBS an open access journal
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
TiO-32
HA90cc
HA93cc
HA95cc
HA97cc
Inte
nsida
d (u
.a.)
2 theta
HAccHA99cc
2 theta
0 20 40 60 80 100
Inten
sity (
coun
ts)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
XDR TiO2
PDF 01-089-4921
Figure 5: %HAcc+%TiO2 XRD pattern without CaO plane but TiO-32 pick. Figure 5: %HAcc+%TiO2 XRD pattern without CaO plane but TiO-3
2 pick.
2 theta
0 20 40 60 80 100
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
HAcc
CaO
2 theta
0 20 40 60 80 100
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
0
200
400
600
800
1000HA95cc
TiO-32
Figure 6: HAcc and HA95cc diffraction patters do not observe CaO plane or rutile phase. And TiO-32 pick.Figure 6: HAcc and HA95cc diffraction patters do not observe CaO plane or
rutile phase. And TiO-32 pick.
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
00.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
HA99cc
HA90cc
HA95cc
HAcc
Va/
cm3(
STP
)g-1
P/Po
Va/cm3 g-1 HAcc
Va/cm3 g-1 HA99cc
Va/cm3 g-1 HA95cc
Va/cm3 g-1 HA90cc
Figure 7: BET tests %HAcc + %TiO2 show mesoporosity for each percentage of dioxide of titanium. The smallest porosity is in 5%TiO2.
TiO2r = 294.0 nm
pick 157.9 nm
HA ccr = 175.9 nm
pick 107.9 nm
HA 95ccr1 = 293.6 nm
pick 1 340.4 nmr2 = 163.6 nmpick 2 2385 nm
HA 90ccr = 206.4 nm
pick 248.8 nm
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Z-SIZE AVERAGE DISTRIBUTION %HA+%TiO2
TiO2
HA cc
HA 95cc
HA 90cc
Figure 8: Z-Size Average Distributions show 1-modal forms for HAcc, HA90cc and TiO2, and 2-modal for HA95cc.Figure 8: Z-Size Average Distributions show 1-modal forms for HAcc, HA90cc and TiO2, and 2-modal for HA95cc.
BET Analysis %HAcc + %TiO2
sample area [m2/g]Hacc 100% 37.8
Hacc 99%TiO2 1% 37.9 0.26%Hacc 95%TiO2 5% 34.7 -8.44%Hacc 90%TiO2 10% 37.8 8.93%
Table 1: %HAcc + %TiO2 BET tests show reduced total area.
Plot data 100%HAcc Adsorption branchVp 0.061055 [cm3 g-1]rp,peak(Area) 1.22 [nm]ap 32.53 [m2 g-1]Plot data 99%HAcc+1%TiO2 Adsorption branchVp 0.064385 [cm3 g-1]rp,peak(Area) 1.66 [nm]ap 30.429 [m2 g-1]Plot data 95%HAcc+5%TiO2 Adsorption branchVp 0.069464 [cm3 g-1]rp,peak(Area) 1.88 [nm]ap 31.243 [m2 g-1]Plot data 90%HAcc+10%TiO2 Adsorption branchVp 0.060931 [cm3 g-1]rp,peak(Area) 1.22 [nm]ap 33.404 [m2 g-1]
Table 2: %HAcc + %TiO2 BJH tests show pore volumen, peak radii and area.
Citation: Ledesma-Carrión DE (2016) Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- Hydroxyapatite. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 6: 189. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Page 4 of 7
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • 1000189J Bioengineer & Biomedical SciISSN:2155-9538 JBBS an open access journal
and υ3 band is at 185-91cm−1 and 100-91cm−1. The FTIR is more specific, they show the change of carbonates and phosphates to calcium titanate. The FTIR experiments were not made in Ar atmosphere but in air, Figure 13.
XPS tests show electrons 2p of titanium replace 2p electrons of phosphorus to bind calcium, see Figure 14. It shows 2p Ca (347.5eV, 351.5eV), 1s O (530.5-531eV), 2p Ti (459.5eV), 2p P (132.5eV) and hydroxyl (531-532eV) bonding energy. For Tables 3 and 4, maximum hardness and elasticity are at HA93cc before SBF. They are minimums after 1 day into SBF. The maximum work of elasticity and plasticity are HA93cc after SBF. The total work increases 52%.
ConclusionThis optimal is between 5wt%TiO2 and 7wt%TiO2. The process
favors the formation of calcium titanate bond. It is important to produce hydroxyapatite without carbonates for titanium take its place
Figure 10: HAcc TEM-HR micrograph shows hexagonal nanostructure and particle size ~100nm.
Figure 10: HAcc TEM-HR micrograph shows hexagonal nanostructure and particle size ~100nm.
a b
c d
Figure 9: Electron diffraction pattern a) HA95cc TEM micrograph shows nanostructure ~100nm, b) HA90cc TEM micrograph shows particle size ~200nm. Electron diffraction shows nanostructure and lightly textured for, c) HA95cc and d) HA90cc.
Figure 11: %HAcc + %TiO2 micrographs SEM-HR show morphology changing. This changing begins at 5% and finishes at 7%.
a b
c d
e f
Figure 11: %HAcc + %TiO2 micrographs SEM-HR show morphology changing. This changing begins at 5% and finishes at 7%.
alongside calcium. The nanometric size (hydroxyapatite and anatase) and crystal structure (hexagonal and tetragonal, respectively) play a fundamental role in the efficient dissemination of titanium into the network of HA. The nanometer HAcc wins elasticity but loses hardness (86%) compared to micro-HA.
Acknowledgement
Authors would like to thank Centro de Nanociencias y Micro y Nanotecnologías del IPN, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo and PhDs Prof. Heriberto Pfeifer, Martha Teresita Ochoa-Lara, Fidel Pérez-Moreno, Omar Novelo-Peralta, Carlos Flores-Morales, Luis Moreno-Ruiz, Mayahuel Ortega, Hugo Martínez, Juan Méndez-Méndez, Luis Lanturno-Rojas, José Andraca, Israel Arzate-Vazquez, Sc.M. Claudia Ramos-Torres, Jorge Osorio-Fuente, Ana Dueñas-Pérez, M.T.L. Muciño-Porras, Esteban Fregoso and Lidia Hernández-Hernández for their help and support in the characterization process.
Research Support
This work is partially financially by UNAM-IN109308, CONACyT 80380 projects.
Citation: Ledesma-Carrión DE (2016) Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- Hydroxyapatite. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 6: 189. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Page 5 of 7
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • 1000189J Bioengineer & Biomedical SciISSN:2155-9538 JBBS an open access journal
Figure 12: %HAcc + %TiO2 Raman spectra show titanium spreading in HA matrix. This event begins at 5% and finished 7% of TiO2.
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
HAcc HAcc99 + 1%TiO2
TiO2
HA
b
OH-
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
HAcc95 + 5%TiO2
-+
TiO2
HA-+
TiO2
HA-+
HAcc93 + 7%TiO27000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
Inte
nsity
(cou
nts)
a
c d
OH-OH-
HAcc90 + 10%TiO2
e
f
TiO2-+
v+3
TiO2
TiO2
v+3 v3
cm-1cm-1
cm-1 cm-1
v+3
TiO2
Figure 12: %HAcc + %TiO2 Raman spectra show titanium spreading in HA matrix. This event begins at 5% and finished 7% of TiO2.
Citation: Ledesma-Carrión DE (2016) Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- Hydroxyapatite. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 6: 189. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Page 6 of 7
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • 1000189J Bioengineer & Biomedical SciISSN:2155-9538 JBBS an open access journal
Figure 13: %HAcc + %TiO2 IR spectra show that in 5% as stringer than others percentages.
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
704000 3800 3600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400
4000 3800 3600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 4000 3800 3600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400
4000 3800 3600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
cm-1cm-1
cm-1 cm-1
OH -P=H
P=OP=O
PO3
vc3 v
2
F
HAcc97 + 3%TiO2HAcc95 + 5%TiO2
HAcc90 + 10%TiO 2HAcc93 + 7%TiO2
OH -
P=H
P=O P=O vc3 v
c3
OH -
P=H
P=OP=O
-
PO3-
PO3-
Tran
smitt
ance
(%)
Tran
smitt
ance
(%)
Tran
smitt
ance
(%)
Tran
smitt
ance
(%)
ab
c d
OH -
P=H
P=Ovc
3
Figure 13: %HAcc + %TiO2 IR spectra show that in 5% as stringer than others percentages.
HA+%TiO2 Average nanoindentation parameterssample %TiO2 Hit [MPa] Eit [GPa] HV [vickers] Welast [pJ] Wplast [pJ] Wtotal [pJ]HAcc 0% 10861.7825 ± 19821.3121 182.6087 ± 297.1019 1005.9150 ± 1835.6637 11192.6071 ± 3934.5444 39647.6983 ± 17929.3067 50840.3058 ± 21561.5568HA 99cc 1% 1651.6287 ± 615.3282 25.642 ± 5.6165 152.9575 ± 56.9867 23019.466 ± 5432.1530 48648.6413 ± 10871.5055 71668.1053 ± 10586.8408HA97cc 3% 1614.936 ± 812.3526 32.3919 ± 9.6548 149.5621 ± 75.2337 18190.4433 ± 1505.5611 52840.02 ± 11248.1245 71030.4667 ± 11398.7152HA95cc 5% 966.6493 ± 685.2454 30.5229 ± 11.0293 89.5233 ± 63.4623 15153.8233 ± 1553.1101 69711.5527 ± 23998.8906 84865.376 ± 24880.1465HA93cc 7% 2074.1293 ± 3809.3971 54.9068 ± 79.3821 192.091 ± 352.8072 13441.668 ± 2431.6398 65936.578 ± 19415.1332 79378.2433 ± 21021.8409HA90cc 10% 432.472 ± 151.8699 17.4101 ± 3.0183 40.0517 ± 14.0646 18323.8373 ± 1208.7926 118682.19 ± 16977.5081 137006.0273 ± 17289.4439
Table 3: Nanoindentation parameters before SBF.
HA+%TiO2 Average nanoindentation parameterssample %TiO2 Hit [MPa] Eit [GPa] HV [vickers] Welast [pJ] Wplast [pJ] Wtotal [pJ]HAcc 0% 7971.9789 ± 20004.4035 70.868 ± 50.5837 738.2879 ± 1852.6095 15709.0584 ± 2708.4144 32336.7937 ± 17779.0402 48045.8516 ± 16574.0745HA 99cc 1% 1973.4312 ± 520.769 26.927 ± 3.321 182.761 ± 48.229 23515.742 ± 2830.237 47297.730 ± 8603.547 70813.469 ± 8213.296HA97cc 3% 2090.5815 ± 868.3384 43.71735 ± 9.3204 193.61155 ± 80.4172 15713.5 ± 1026.5850 45155.271 ± 12376.4190 60868.7685 ± 12275.2318HA95cc 5% 1824.8085 ± 1744.0362 43.4206 ± 20.9334 168.9960 ± 161.5158 14207.309 ± 1130.2231 62104.081 ± 26317.3756 76311.3885 ± 25895.8589HA93cc 7% 916.101 ± 599.7327 12.3915 ± 4.7685 84.8414 ± 55.5422 34992.4685 ± 4764.2556 85797.2465 ± 31177.6652 120789.717 ± 32705.3705HA90cc 10% 1877.009 ± 2646.3581 31.8122 ± 21.1760 173.8311 ± 245.0781 18642.0865 ± 1703.0802 67980.0035 ± 32249.0934 86622.0905 ± 33030.2897
Table 4: Nanoindentation parameters after SBF 1 day.
Citation: Ledesma-Carrión DE (2016) Characterization and Effect of Anatase on Nano- Hydroxyapatite. J Bioengineer & Biomedical Sci 6: 189. doi:10.4172/2155-9538.1000189
Page 7 of 7
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • 1000189J Bioengineer & Biomedical SciISSN:2155-9538 JBBS an open access journal
References
1. http://webmineral.com/data/Apatite-(CaOH).shtml
2. Piña MC, Munguía N, Palma R, Lima E (2006) Caracterización de hueso de bovino anorgánico: Nukbone. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana 20: 150-155.
3. Villora JM, Callejas P, Barba MF (2002) Métodos de síntesis y comportamiento
térmico del hidroxiapatito. Boletin de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio 45: 443-450.
4. Kikuchi M, Itoh S, Ichinose S, Shinomiya K, Tanaka J (2001) Self-organization mechanism in a bone-like hydroxyapatite/collagen nanocomposite synthesized in vitro and its biological reaction in vivo. Biomaterials 22: 1705-1711.
5. Ali ANE, Mizoguchib T, Ito M, Bitar M, Salih V, et al. (2007) In vitro bioactivityand gene expression by cells cultured on titanium dioxide doped phosphate-based glasses. Biomaterials 28: 2967-2977.
6. Ledesma-Carrión DE (2015) Modification on the Synthesis Process of Hydroxyapatite. Asian Journal of Science and Technology 6: 1311-1315.
7. Ledesma-Carrión DE (2015) Nano-Hardness and Elasticity for HydroxyapatiteBefore and After of Immersing It into Simulated Body Fluid. IJETST 2: 2704-2709.
8. Kumar RR, Wang M (2002) Functionally graded bioactive coatings ofhydroxyapatite/titanium oxide composite system. Materials Letter 55: 133-137.
9. Fidancevska E, Ruseska G, Bossert J, Lin YM, Boccaccini AR (2007) Fabrication and characterization of bioce-ramic composites based based onhydroxyapatite and titania. Materials Chemistry and Physics 103:95-100.
10. Oyane A, Kim HM, Furuya T, Kokubo T, Miyazaki T, et al. (2003) Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 65: 188-195.
11. García C, Paucar C, Gaviria J (2006) Study of some parameters that determine the synthesis of hydroxyapatite by the precipitation route. Dyna 73: 9-15.
12. Guzmán C, Piña C, Munguía N (2005) Stoichiometric hydroxyapatite obtained by precipitation and sol gel processes. Rev Mex Fis 51: 284-293.
1400000
1200000
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400eV
& + $ *# *Ti 2p +C 1s #O 1s $Ca 2p &P 2p
10% TiO2
7% TiO2
5% TiO2
HAcc
TiO2
coun
ts/s
(a.
u.)
Figure 14: % HAcc + % TiO2 XPS tests.