earthly millennium energy and interstellar shuttle propulsion

Upload: kayvan16

Post on 03-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    1/8

    Page 1

    Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle

    Propulsion Potentials of Liquid Space Optics

    J. H. Bloomer., DISCRAFT Corp., 1990 SE 157th Dr., Portland, OR 97233, USA

    Ph. (503)251-6914 ; FAX, (503)252-2383

    Copyright 1993 by IECEC: ACS/AIAA/AIChE/ANS/ASME/IEEE/SAE

    The present concept is that of solar/stellar-orbiting, energy-gathering-and-continuous-pinpoint-

    redistributing, self-formed, liquid, laser-optical systems for both millennium-level, power-from-space

    facilities and energy supply to 1g-accelerating/decelerating, interplanetary/interstellar luxury spaceships

    cruising at up to 25% light-speed. It recently was termed Theoretical and visionary by the present

    Review Committee of the IECEC. The U.S. Air Force in 1965 in imposing a secrecy order on same (patent

    application thereof) said it was found to contain subject matter the unauthorized disclosure of which

    might be detrimental to the national security (later removed at the respective requests of a U.S. Senator

    and the SBA). A few years later the U.S. Patent Office declared it was obvious. So take your pick. But if

    Im right in this our individual and collective search for a tool, whereby space exploration can be made to

    pay for itself as-you-go by selling to the public a tangible commodity, is at an end. Let alone a tool for the

    actual exploration/exploitation.

    Vast self-orbiting solar energy handling satellites (SEHS) were enabled and innovated by the present

    writer as a result of his 64 invention of liquid space optics (LSO) or more specifically capillary

    epihydrostatic optics (Bloomer, 1965, 65-66). The following is a very brief summary of a whole new

    proposed technology for space exploration and exploitation based on LSO and SEHS. LSO technology is

    expected to drive down by orders of magnitude the cost of space launch and propulsion operations in

    general. SEHS bootstrap themselves exponentially into orbit mostly under their own collected (converted,

    LSO-laserbeamed solar energy). LSO-based SEHS, once in place in orbit, readily should pay for themselves

    (and as well for most other future space activities) while retiring all conventional energy sources fromservice in favor of ecologically clean, free solar energy beamed down from orbit (Bloomer, 1966, 1991).

    SEHS require mostly simple and common raw materials found in profusion all over the solar system.

    Consequently since solar energy is effectively unlimited, as much free solar energy as is desired

    theoretically can be delivered self-paid. Energy quantity desired evidently is going to be proportional to

    (worldwide consensus of) quality of life desired, since (Erb, 1992) The utilization of energy is a surrogate

    for economic productivity and quality of life. Ecological restoration and cessation of ecological pressure

    evidently requires three elements: (1) enormous energy resources for worldwide ecological clean-up and

    repair, (2) replacement of present energy-gathering systems with one that is safe, non-polluting, and

    makes no demands on the natural habitat, (3) elevation of worldwide living standards to the highest

    conceivable levels, since (ONeill, 1992) ecological pressure of populations is inversely proportional to

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    2/8

    Page 2

    personal wealth. LSO-based SEHS, therefore, evidently singlehandedly and permanently would solve

    most known ecological problems while of much more individual significance of course- serving in

    principle actually to precipitate the Biblical millennium (Revelation).

    Other SEHS would dispatch (converted, LSO-laserbeamed) energy to space exploration/exploitation/user

    projects all about the solar system and beyond. I published the SEHS concept of power from spaceoriginally in 66 in connection with a pioneering plan to use it to send a flyby ship to Alpha Centauri at

    25% the speed of light (Bloomer, 1966). Below I extend these notions to propose a manned roundtrip

    such expedition also at c/4 to the same destination.

    LSO Foundations

    LSO foundations are in the variational treatment on energy considerations by Ta Li (Li, 1960), while actual

    derivation (unpublished) therefrom of the fundamental LSO formula is available from this author(Bloomer, 1967). The latter results in (See Fig. 1) the error expression,

    3

    0

    10

    2

    1 DCng ,

    where:

    C=lv

    vaporliquid

    ,

    and = imposed deviation in cm., measured normal to axis, from (zero-g) spherical figure, caused by an

    axial load, ng0; n = axial load in sea-level gravities; g0 = sea-level gravity, cm/sec2; D = diameter of liquid-

    optic, cm; = focal ratio of given optic; liquid= density of optical liquid gm/cm3

    ;vapor = density of optical

    liquids vapor, gm/cm3; lv= surface tension of optical liquid, dyne/cm.

    For example, application of above equation indicates diffraction-limited operation of a one-mile-diameter

    liquid optic requires that no greater (axial deemed worst case) acceleration than 7.16 10-15

    sea-level

    earth gravities operate. If unprotected-liquid-mirror axis is aimed at the sun (worst-case), then solar

    electromagnetic radiation pressure results in an acceleration of 9.7 10-11

    sea-level earth gravities

    obviously highly significant and necessitating shielding.

    Liquid-optic mirror variable-focus feature, on the other hand, is actually enabled by variable-geometry

    nearby masses, which impose time-varying and space-varying gravitational loads on the optic such as to

    (1) render it continuously diffraction-limited, and (2) vary its focus in real-time under astronaut or ground

    control. Latter feature permits a Laserpowered, Remote Electricrocket Motor (LREM) aboard an

    associated interplanetary or interstellar spacecraft, to operate continuously at the LSO-macrolaser focus

    in acceleration and deceleration maneuvers.

    Capillary surface of all reflective liquid space optics at this juncture, seems best implemented with (liquid-

    metal) galliumplating on a Dow-Corning silicone DC-200 liquid plastic substrate while refractive optics

    appear best surfaced with just the DC-200. (Liquid) galliumized DC-200, used for the astronomical-

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    3/8

    Page 3

    precision (correct overall to green-light /4) beam-tightener telescope primary, is therefore comparable

    in elements to the total systems low-precision, much larger (solid) aluminized-mylar solar collector

    mirror (highly reflective, gallium is a member of the aluminum family).

    Fig. 1. Error In a Liquid Space Optic Due to a Finite Axial Load ng0

    LSO Seed Solar Energy Handling Satellite

    Seed SEHS, 4.4 miles in diameter, 1.6 106

    lb, may be bootstrapped or exponentiated from much

    smaller beginnings, or assembled in LEO from 24 Saturn V -type rocket loads (24L of 200,000 lb each). It

    consists of 0.0007-inch-thick aluminized mylar (plastic) solar-collecting mirror, laser, laser-pumping

    mechanism and optical secondary, all at the collector focus, on the one hand, and the variable-focus,

    gravitationally-figured primary mirror, riding freely in a concentric cavity of the collector (in an

    independent orbit), on the other. Using collected solar energy, first task of the seed SEHS would be to

    propel itself to GEO.

    There, to bootstrap itself, SSTO Single-Stage-To-Orbit (-and- return) ferry shuttles, taking power from

    SEHS earth-directed laserbeam, would be propelled straight up to circumferentially augment thecollector mirror, primary and secondary. Each SSTO is planned as a 100T gwt., 50%-payload-fraction, 50-

    ft-diameter, double-convex disc with combination of airscrew/rocket propulsion systems in base.

    C = CHARACTERISTIC = /lv

    R3 = RADIUS OF MIRROR = D (2.107)0.983

    F = FOCAL LENGTH = R3/2

    D = APERTURE

    = F/D

    N = LOAD IN g0S

    = (c,R3,N,D) = ERROR = 1+2

    3

    0

    10

    2

    1 DCNg

    (By permission of the American Astronautical Society, Bloomer, 1965)

    Ng0

    21

    R3

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    4/8

    Page 4

    The laser cavity is filled with a gas which absorbs the reflected solar energy and lases, i.e., transmits a

    coherent beam normal to the rods end-surfaces. The end-mirror nearest the great solar mirror is partially

    silvered, so that a portion of the coherent energy in the rod continuously escapes. The escaping beam is

    diverged by secondary lens. The latter is rigidly mounted to laser-rod and pump, by strut-supports.

    The diverged coherent beam illuminates the large (172-mile-diameter) liquid-surface primary mirror.

    High-precision primary is bordered by a rigid plastic-foam boundary-ring. Laser energy, focused by

    reflection from primary, passes through the empty interior of collar and emerges in the form of focusedhigh-energy coherent beam. The beam supplies energy at or near its focus to disc-like craft (Fig. 3) which

    might carry a protected payload.

    Fig. 2. Multi-Orbit Solar or Stellar

    Macrolaser Driving Laserpowered

    Remote Electricrocket Motor with

    Associated Spaceship (Acceleration or

    Deceleration)

    At the extreme left of Figure 2

    is the great solar 10,300-mile-

    diameter collector mirror. It

    focuses solar energy onto the

    semi-silvered collar-like

    pumping mechanism. Energy

    trapped by multiple reflections

    in collar is transferred to the

    transparent, hollow laser

    cylindrical cavity. Rod is

    maintained concentric with

    collar by strut-supports.

    Fig. 3. Laserpowered Remote Electricrocket

    Motor (LREM) Driving Shrouded Freighter

    or Spaceship Payload

    Interplanetary and Interstellar LREM

    Spaceships

    Note in Fig. 3, (1) is payload (stoppable or

    unstoppable); (2) is Laserpowered Remote

    Electricrocket Motor-Disc (Frozen

    Hydrogen); (3) is insulator spike-bed to fix

    separation between disc and electrode

    mesh; (4) is electrode mesh; (5) is envelope

    of exhaust plume; (6) is direction of

    impinging laser beam from distant SEHS; (7)

    is direction of rocket exhaust.

    5

    41

    3

    2

    7

    6

    7

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    5/8

    Page 5

    Stopping Payloads then Astronauts in Stellar Orbit

    Strategy is to bootstrap SEHS (augment with SSTO freighters) at an exponential rate with material

    extracted from earth and/or planets, to a final 10,300-mile (overall, collector-diameter-size) system

    (comparable to the diameter of the earth), one with diffraction-limited, variable-focus, 172-mile-

    diameter, liquid, optical primary (mirror), This entire unit would then propel itself to solar orbit at thAstronomical Unit, permitting the dispatching in turn at c/4 of a succession of spaceships. Some tens or

    hundreds of such flyby braking systems with associated Centauri -stoppable payload(Figs 2,3,4) would

    be launched, each planned to stop its associated 140,000 -lb machinery/tools/hardware freighter

    payload in Alpha Centauri (chosen sun) System orbit (by focusing A.C. stellar radiation backwards on the

    ships rocket power converters during flyby). Final such payload would consist just of the twenty

    astronauts themselves plus their living quarters grossing another 140,000 lb.

    Figure 4 illustrates a stoppable ship (payload) with associated flyby SEHS (in this case Stellar Energy

    Handling Spaceship) in a braking approach to the target star, where (1) is target star, (2) and (3) are

    hypothetical planets, (4) is the primary LSO mirror of the flyby braking system, (5) is the diverged laser

    beam illuminating the primary mirror, (6) is the laser/diverging lens assembly, (7) is the envelope of

    focused stellar energy, (8) is the giant collector mirror, (9) is the central perforation in the collector

    mirror, (10) is hypothetical interplanetary space of target star; (11) is envelope of laser beam focused by

    primary mirror; (12) is braking rocket exhaust envelope; (13) is braking rocket; (14) is 140,000-lb

    stoppable payload shroud; (15) and (16) are hypothetical stopped payload-shrouds, already orbiting

    target star, (17) is direction of motion of the flyby braking systems.

    Fig. 4. Stoppable Passenger

    or Freighter Spaceship in

    Braking Approach to Target

    Star

    1

    2

    174

    68

    5

    7

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    3

    15

    16

    1

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    6/8

    Page 6

    Assembling SEHS in Stellar Orbit, then Earth Return

    Astronauts first task in stellar orbit would be to assemble the respective 140,000-lb payloads into the

    local SEHS (Stellar Energy Handling Satellite) factory required to build SEHS of sufficient size to returnthem at c/4 to earth. Upon completion, astronauts would use the local, variable-focus, steerable, SEHS

    beam to drive (supply energy to) local exploratory vehicles, for exhaustive investigation of the Alpha

    Centauri (3 star) System. Return would then be implemented by augmenting the earth-going ship with

    sufficient (20 extra) expellant to permit both starting at c/4 from A.C., and then stopping their living

    module in earth orbit via beamed energy from the permanent solar-orbiting SEHS already available (no

    flyby braking system required).

    Overall efficiency of interplanetary/interstellar SEHS-associated propulsion system is estimated about 1%.

    Continuous power required to propel to th

    lightspeed a stellar flyby system capable of stopping an

    associated 140,000-lb payload package is estimated 51015

    watts (=5000 terawatts; for perspective, note

    the entire present power production of the globe may be some 10 terawatts).

    Using an aluminized mylar solar collector mirror at 0.0007 in. thickness (Schjeldahl, 1965) with average

    density estimated 2.0, and presuming the associated Laser-Inverted Telescope apparatus is th

    the weight

    of the collector, then the total SEHS in th

    A.U. solar orbit needed to propel an entire flyby SEHS (Stellar

    Energy Handling Spaceship) to Alpha Centauri, by the same token will weigh about 6.7109

    metric tons,

    and will be some 10,300 miles in (collector) diameter overall. Each flyby SEHS to Centauri is of course sent

    only for the purpose of braking its associated 140,000-lb spacecraft to stop the latter in Centauri orbit.

    Liquid-optic orbital primary mirror associated with the above collector system, it is estimated should be

    built about 172 miles in diameter. If diffraction-limited (in visible light), such a beam-tightener mirror

    system, used in reverse as an astronomical telescope, will give a resolution of about 5 ft. at Alpha

    Centauri distance (4.3 lightyears).

    Lets say, astronomical studies in advance, using the 172-mi.-diameter-primary, diffraction-limited solar-

    orbiting telescope, indicate astronauts can build from local materials a return (accelerator) Stellar

    Collector System to handle a 20 140,000-lb-payload (combined payload) rocketship at c/4 from Alpha

    Centauri. Note that (Bloomer, 1966), ratio of c/4 laser-supplied rocketship expellant weight to payload

    weight, is about 20-to-1. So twenty squaredtimes the normal 140,000-lb-payload return spacecraft will

    be needed, to carry both starting and stopping expellant.

    Then, presuming an Alpha Centauri target star comparable to our own sun, required diameter of the A.C.-

    orbiting accelerators collector system to return the 20 astronauts to earth would be about 376 miles.

    Total roundtrip mission duration should be about 40 years or less.

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    7/8

    Page 7

    Fig. 5. Earth Return Stellar Energy Handling Spaceship in Acceleration Phase.

    Alpha Centauri Orbiting SEHS Factory

    Next question is, presuming adequate quantity and quality of raw materials exist in A.C. stellar system (as

    obtainable from local planets, asteroids, moons, etc.), what factories do we need to send along with the

    astronauts, so that they can manufacture their own return accelerator? Best no doubt would be to send

    along a considerable quantity, say, of pure gallium, plus all manner of instruments, tools and hardware,

    and some non-self-contained, laser-supplied, space shuttle ships, presuming that they can rely on the

    A.C. stellar system for, in particular, raw materials for plastics (as well as of course energy for propulsion).

    If the latter is the case, it might be necessary to stop only a few tens or hundreds of 1 40,000-lb

    payloads in A.C.-orbit, for astronaut use there (Otherwise we would have to send a maximum of 6.5 106

    self-stoppable ships at 108

    tons each).

    Once they have completed and checked out (by their return!), an A.C.-orbiting, 376-mile-diameter-

    collector accelerator/decelerator system, we have in place an interstellar shuttle system, one operating

    repeatedly between our Solar System and the Alpha Centauri Stellar System.

  • 7/28/2019 Earthly Millennium Energy and Interstellar Shuttle Propulsion...

    8/8

    Page 8

    Provision of local planetary (Solar System) one-gravity acceleration-deceleration propulsion systems, as

    well as millennium-style free energy on earth from (earth or solar) orbit, are of course merely early

    development stages of such an advanced Newtonian interstellar shuttle system as that described above.

    References

    Bloomer, J.H., in Space Electronics Symposium; Editor, C.M. Wong; AAS Science and Technology Series;

    Printed and Distributed by Western Periodicals Co., No. Hollywood, CA., 1965, Vol. 6; pp. IV-37.

    Bloomer, J.H., Liquid Space Optic Optics, Journal of the Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation

    Engineers, 1965-66, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 65-70.

    Bloomer, J.H., In Proceedings of 17th

    International Astronautical Federation Congress, 1966, IAF, 3-5 Rue

    Mario-Nikis, 75015 Paris, France.

    Bloomer, J.H., Physical Chemistry and Geometrical Optics, 1967, unpublished.

    Bloomer, J.H., In America at the ThresholdAmericas Space Exploration Initiative Outreach; Editor,

    Thomas P. Stafford; Space Self-fabrication of Very Large Diffraction-Limited Liquid Optics;

    Published by U.S. Govt. Printing Ofc., Washington, D.C. 20402, 1991.

    Erb, R. Bryan In Proceedings of 43rd

    IAF Congress, Paper No. IAF-92-0595, 1992, International

    Astronautical Federation, 3-5 Rue Mario-Nikis, 75015 Paris, France.

    Li, Ta, Hydrostatics in Various Gravitational Fields, General Dynamics Astronautics Division, Space

    Physics Group, Applied Research Report; San Diego, CA.; 1960.

    ONeill, Gerard K. In Trilogy Jan./Feb. 1992, pp. 48-54; published by Space Studies Institute, Box 82,

    Princeton, N.J. 08542.

    Schjeldahl, G.T. Co., Echo II Satelloon Worlds Largest Spacecraft, Brochure, Northfield, Minn,; circa

    1965.