easterside academy data analysis · this cohort made good progress in year 1. measured from autumn...
TRANSCRIPT
Easterside Academy
Easterside Academy
Data Analysis
Last Updated: Summer 2016
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
2
Analysis of Last Year’s Results 2015-16
Reception
On Entry Profile
This cohort of children started Target Tracker when they were in Nursery last year so the tracking
of their progress continued as they moved into Reception.
31 Girls / 18 Boys.
63% Pupil Premium.
This data includes the pupils in the High Needs Base (HNB) – 5 pupils working well below
expectations.
- It is not possible to compare the entry data to the previous year’s cohort as they didn’t move onto
Target Tracker until Autumn 2. - Girls attained higher in all of the prime areas at ‘working at or above expectation’. Boys attained
slightly higher than girls in the % working at ‘above expectation’ in some areas of the prime e.g.
‘Listening and Attention’ and ‘Making Relationships’.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
3
- Girls attain higher in the % at expected or above in ‘Reading’, ‘Writing’ and ‘Number’. The gap is at
its narrowest for writing. - The majority of pupils were working within 22 – 36 month band or 30 – 50 month band on entry to
Reception.
End of Reception
Age Related Expectations
- Excluding the HNB (5 pupils).
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
4
End of Reception Statutory Assessment
- Excluding the HNB (5 pupils).
- Areas coming out the strongest for this cohort are: Health & Self Care, Managing Feelings and
Behaviour, Making Relationships and Technology.
- Yoga Bugs has impacted positively on attention and listening. On entry to reception 18.4% were
working at expected and by the end of the year 83.7% (with HNB). It has also have a positive impact
on Moving & Handling as well as Self Confidence & Self Awareness. (See Yoga Bugs Report)
- Areas coming out the least strongest for this cohort are: Being Imaginative, Writing and The World.
- This year the % in Reading has improved whilst Writing is similar to last year. Number has
significantly improved from last year. Reading and Writing continue to be an area of development
across the school next academic year.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
5
- Girls have not outperformed boys in all areas this year, unlike last year. Boys have performed
better in Reading, People and Communities, The World and Being Imaginative.
- Non Pupil Premium performed better than pupil premium in all areas within the ELGs apart from
‘Being Imaginative’. The gap was narrowest in: Health and Self-Care, Managing Feelings and
Behaviour, Making Relationships and Technology.
- Excluding the HNB (5 pupils).
Commentary GLD 61% and 68% (Excluding the HNB). Not including the HNB pupils, this is an increase from last
year and secures a four year upward trend. It is also above last year’s National overall GLD (66.3%)
as well as above the National for boys (58.6%). The predicted NA for this year is around 69%.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
6
The gap between gender has decreased by 22.4% this year leaving a gap of only 2.3%.
The gap between pupil premium and non-pupil premium has increased.
From a low reception baseline at the start of the year, pupils in reception have made good progress
and the majority are working at expectations.
Next year the focus will continue to be on ensuring the gender gap in narrowed, as well as
addressing the gap between pupil premium and non-pupil premium.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
7
Key Stage 1
Year 1 Phonic Screening
- Pass Mark: 32 - 4 HNB pupils are not included as were disapplied. One mainstream child was absent
and therefore we have not included in this analysis. They were predicted to pass.
- These were not the results we had predicted and action was put into place immediately. This
included re-deploying skilled staff to groups of these children for daily phonic teaching as well as
booking early reading training for all Early Years and KS1 staff in September.
- A new teacher into KS1 has possibly impacted on this data this year.
- Year 2: 1 HNB child was Disapplied. All Year 2 pupils who re-sat the rest pass except one child who
has joined us in Year 2 working on P Levels.
End KS1 Outcomes – The Cohort - 32 children in the cohort with 1 HNB child with an EHCP (on P Levels).
- 63% girls / 38% boys.
- 50% are Pupil Premium.
- 1 pupil joined in Year 2 with SEN needs requiring a 1 to 1 and working on P Levels. They are
included in the date where the HNB pupil is taken out.
End of Reception Profile
- This Year 2 cohort got 55% GLD at the end of Reception.
- Reading got 55% at expected with 21% exceeding / Writing got 52% with 15% exceeding and
Number got 55% with 15% exceeding. There was lower achievement in ‘Listening and Attention’
with 30% emerging and 33% still emerging in writing.
- Most children entered Reception working below 22 – 36 mths and most left at 40 – 60 mths.
Attainment and Progress in Key Stage 1 - Excluding the HNB (1 pupil) – working below National Curriculum Levels.
- This cohort are the first to sit the new SATs test and be assessed against the Interim Framework for
the End of KS1.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
8
- The % at the National Standard in Reading is 83.9% / 81.3% incl HNB. This is higher than the National
Average (74.1%) and the average within Middlesbrough schools (67%). Those that are working at
Greater Depth is also higher than both the National and Local average – 25%.
- The % at the National Standard in Writing is 74% / 71.9% incl HNB. This is higher than the National
Average (65.5%) and the average within Middlesbrough schools (57.4%). Those working at greater
depth is slightly lower than the National Average but higher than the local – 12.5%.
- The % at the National Standard in Maths is 74% / 71.9% incl HNB. Without the HNB child included
this is again above the National (72.7%) and local (64.4%) averages. Those working at greater depth
is higher than both the National and local averages – 18.8%.
- The combined is 68% / 65.6% incl HNB. This is above both the National (60.3%) and Local (51.8%)
averages. The combined working at greater depth is also higher than both National and Local – 12.5%.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
9
Commentary
This cohort made good progress in Year 1. Measured from Autumn Half Term to the end of the
Summer Term. The cohort moved from the old National Curriculum to the new assessment on
Target Tracker over this period. Progress was 3/4 steps over the 4 half terms. This was sufficient
progress.
At the end of Year 1 the % at ARE on the new curriculum was very encouraging:
Reading 90%
Writing 86.7%
Maths 90%
- Progress in Year 2 – the cohort’s ‘steps/points’ (Excluding the HNB) was sufficient:
Reading 5.5
Writing 5.5
Maths 5.4
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
10
Key Stage 2
Attainment and Progress in Key Stage 2
End KS2 Outcomes – The Cohort - 30 children in the cohort with 1 child with SEN joining Year 6 in September 2015.
- 40% girls / 60% boys - significant.
- 67% are Pupil Premium - significant.
- 33% SEN / 23% inward mobility.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
11
- The % that met the standard in Reading is 67%. This is above the National (65.7%) and Local (61.3%)
average.
- The % that met the standard and above in Writing is 70%. This is slightly below the National (74%)
and higher than the Local (68%).
- The % that met the standard in Maths is 83%. This is significantly above the National (70%) and
Local (70%) averages.
- The % that met the standard in GPS is 73%. This is higher than the National (72%) and Local (70%)
averages.
- The % that secured combined was 60%. This was higher than the National (53%) and the Local
(49%) averages.
Commentary - Progress in Year 6 – the cohort’s APS was:
- Historical Average APS per term Year 1 to end of Year 4.
Reading Writing Maths
All 1.10 1.08 1.07
Girls 1.13 1.13 1.10
Boys 1.08 1.05 1.05
Pupil Premium 1.07 1.04 1.02
Non Pupil Premium 1.18 1.16 1.16
SEN 0.90 0.84 0.85
Non SEN 1.18 1.18 1.16
G&T 1.20 1.14 1.19
Non G&T 1.07 1.05 1.04
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
12
- Pupil Premium pupils have made more progress than non-pupil premium in Reading and Maths and
the same in Writing. Although this shows excellent progress for the pupil premium children, the
gap between them and non-pupil premium is evident in all areas this year for the first time.
- This cohort are the first to sit the new SATs tests. They have had less than two years to get to grips
with the new, more challenging curriculum. Although they have done well in comparison to the
National Average, it would appear that this time, despite the excellent progress has not been
enough to enable the pupil premium pupils to reach the standard in some cases.
- The gap between gender is only slightly evident in writing and not significant.
- End of KS1 results:
End KS1: 2C+ 2B+ 2A+
Reading: 60% 51% 36%
Writing: 72% 45% 24%
Maths: 63% 57% 24%
- Nearly 50% of pupils (without HNB) were on the SEN register in Year 2.
Expected Progress in Key Stage 2
- Not known yet.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
13
Current School Profile
Reception
Progress - Excluding HNB (5 pupils).
Commentary - Progress from Autumn 1 to Summer 2.
- See EYFS outcomes at the start of the report.
This profile was last updated following a round of assessments in Summer 2 2016
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
14
Key Stage 1
Attainment and Progress See also KS1 Outcomes at the start of the report.
End of Reception – Year 1 - 62% GLD.
- Reading 72% Expected / Exceeded.
- Writing 72% Expected / Exceeded.
End of Reception – Year 2 - See KS1 Outcomes at the start of the report.
Year 1
- Excluding the HNB (4 pupils) – (Se individual progress records).
- Progress has been sufficient in Year 1 (5 steps).
- Girls and boys have made the same or similar progress with no significant gap.
- Pupil Premium have made slightly less / or same progress as non-pupil premium – no significant
gap.
- The % of pupils at ARE is low in Year 1. An extra Level 3 TA has been employed to support the
teaching and learning for Year 2 next year.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
15
Year 2
- Excluding the HNB (1 pupil) and child that joined Y2 late (see individual progress records).
- Progress in Year 2 has been sufficient which has led to some excellent outcomes in line with or
above National Average.
- Progress is consistent across the three areas of learning.
- Girls have made slightly better progress than boys.
- Pupil Premium have made slightly less /or the same progress as Non-Pupil Premium.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
16
Key Stage 2
Attainment and Progress
Years 3, 4, 5 and 6
Year 3
- Sufficient progress has been 6 points.
- Progress has been good in all areas for all groups.
- The % at ARE for this cohort has increased this year.
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
17
Year 4
- Sufficient progress has been 6 points.
- Progress has been good in all areas for all groups except SEN which is slightly lower.
- The % at ARE for this cohort has increased this year but needs to be a focus for next year.
Year 5
Target Tracker Analysis End Summer 2016
18
- Sufficient progress has been 6 points.
- Progress has been good in all areas for all groups.
- The % at ARE for this cohort has increased this year but needs to be a focus for next year.