ecological drivers and species interactions of whirling ... · pdf fileecological drivers and...
TRANSCRIPT
University of Colorado, BoulderCU Scholar
Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program
Spring 2014
Ecological Drivers and Species Interactions ofWhirling DiseaseJulie ByleUniversity of Colorado Boulder
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Honors Program at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate HonorsTheses by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Recommended CitationByle, Julie, "Ecological Drivers and Species Interactions of Whirling Disease" (2014). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 58.
Ecological Drivers and Species Interactions of
Whirling Disease
Julie Allyson Byle
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of Colorado Boulder
April 7, 2014
Dr. Robert Guralnick of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Dr. Barbara Demmig-Adams of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Dr. Diane McKnight of the Department of Environmental Science, Civil, Environmental, and
Architectural Engineering, and the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
2
Table of Contents
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………4
Background ……………………………………………………………………………………...5
Whirling Disease………………………………….……………………………………...6
Myxobolus cerebralis lifecycle………………………………….………………………..7
Study System Species
Didymosphenia geminata……………………………………….…………8
Tubifex tubifex…………………………………………………….……...10
Trout………………………………………………………………………………11
Species interactions………………………………………………………………………12
Materials and Methods…………………………………………………………………………...12
Patterns of oligochaete abundance and D. geminata cover……………………………...12
D. geminata as a refuge from predation for T. tubifex …………………………………..13
D. geminata as a stream flow refuge for T. tubifex……………………………….……...14
Results……………………………………………………………………………………………16
Oligochaete abundance sampling………………………………………………..16
Predator refuge experiment………………………………………………………18
Stream flow refuge experiment ………………………………………………….19
Driver of disease table….………………………………………………………..20
Discussion………………………………………………………………………………………..21
Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………25
Literature Cited…………………………………………………………………………………..26
3
Abstract
Whirling disease is on the rise since its introduction in the United States in 1958 and is a health
problem both in fisheries and in wild populations of salmonids. Prevalence of the disease is
dependent on ecological context and interactions among multiple other species, including algal
species such as the also invasive diatom Didymosphenia geminata, the oligochaete worm Tubifex
tubifex, and the myxozoan parasite Myxobolus cerebralis that is the causative agent of whirling
disease in salmonid fishes. D. geminata, a stalk-producing diatom has increased in frequency
worldwide and is now invasive across the United States. The stalks of D. geminata create an
environment suitable for oligochaetes such as T. tubifex. Based on existing data oligochaete
abundance is higher in areas with higher percent cover of D. geminata, and whirling disease
prevalence in trout is 3X higher in streams with blooms. My research further examined why
oligochaetes are more abundant specifically in streams with D. geminata blooms focusing on the
mechanisms that might promote T. tubifex density increases, including predator release. The
results provide some new insights into the multifaceted and complex ecological interactions that
can promote increased amounts of whirling disease in ecologically and economically important
salmonid fishes. I attempt to place these results in the context of a larger collection of ecological
drivers that explain interactions among all the actors involved.
4
Introduction
In the summer of 2013, I conducted a research project on direct and indirect effects of
algal blooms by the diatom, Didymosphenia geminata on the intermediate whirling disease host,
Tubifex tubifex, a freshwater oligochaete worm, at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
with Dr. Brad Taylor from Dartmouth College. To understand why oligochaetes are more
abundant in streams with D. geminata blooms, I aimed to experimentally test several hypotheses.
My first hypothesis was that the long filaments, or stalks, that D. geminata produces may be
providing a refuge for oligochaetes against predatory invertebrates such as the stone fly
Hesperopola pacifica. I hypothesized that oligochaete mortality from invertebrate predators
would be lower when D. geminata stalks are more abundant. Second, since D. geminata stalks
form dense, thick mats on the streambed, I aimed to test the hypothesis that D. geminata mats
engineer an ecosystem that is more suitable for T. tubifex who prefer slow-moving backwaters
habitats (Larned, 2011), which are rare habitats in most high-gradient Rocky Mountain streams.
My experimental work provided a snapshot view of how substrate may directly or
indirectly impact the abundance of T. tubifex, which appears to be a key regulator in whirling
disease prevalence (McMurtry, 1983). In order to better understand how important the latter
factor may be given the complex life-cycle of Myxobolus cerebralis and the actors with whom it
interacts, I also looked more broadly at the whirling disease literature in order to properly frame
my results. In particular, I performed a literature review on those other factors and assembled a
conceptual model on what might drive increases in whirling disease, and where gaps in our
knowledge exist of this system overall. This model could serve as a means to generate new
hypotheses and to integrate both my current and previous work.
5
I have organized this work to first provide a brief background on the history of whirling
disease and the methods of introduction of the parasite M. cerebralis into the United States.
Next, the life cycles and habitat preferences of each main species involved in whirling disease
are described and it is explained how each of these actors interact with each other in their
environment to make this disease so successful. Relevant literature is incorporated on
environmental conditions that influence availability of preferable habits, rates of distribution,
establishment in these habitats, and the susceptibility of trout to infection with whirling disease
in these habitats. Details on my experimental design are provided as well as results related to
my hypotheses that the diatom blooms both provide predator refuge and engineer a more
suitable habitat for T. tubifex, and then close by again broadly considering management
implications for my work.
Background
Disease ecology is an interdisciplinary field that utilizes ecological theory and practice to
understand living, biotic and non-living, abiotic drivers determining host and pathogen
interactions and their ultimate impacts on human-relevant issues such as health. Living systems
are dynamic and complex and their behavior may be hard to predict from the properties of
individual parts, requiring an integrative discipline that can take a systems view of emerging
diseases and their course. Studying the ecology of specific diseases and creating models to better
understand interactions among wildlife hosts, vectors, and pathogens, can be a tool to help
determine risk, manage, and possibly prevent disease. My research aim was to both better
understand the interactions among the pathogens, hosts, and their environment; both in the broad
picture, as well as perform a targeted set of field experiments. The interest here was meant to
clarify a complex system and many strands and pieces of knowledge found in the literature,
6
informed by my own fieldwork. Below I provide an overview of that literature as background
before describing my experimental work in the field.
Whirling Disease
Whirling disease is on the rise since its introduction in the United States in 1958 and is a
health problem both in fisheries and in wild populations of salmonids (Gilbert, 2003). In
Colorado alone, 14 out of 15 major drainages in Colorado tested positive for whirling disease
(Nehring, 2003). Also in Colorado, recreational fishing generates millions of dollars in economic
activity each year, and since whirling disease has been introduced, some locations in Colorado
(e.g., Gunnison River) have experienced declines in salmonid density and biomass by as much as
90% (Nehring, 2003; Nehring, 2006).
Whirling disease was first described in rainbow trout in Europe in 1893 when Bruno
Hofer recorded signs and symptoms such as whirling behavior and a blackened caudal region,
and detected microscopic parasitic spores that he named Myxobolous cerebralis (Spaulding,
2007). M. cerebralis, a myxozoan parasite, has been identified as the causative agent of
whirling disease that requires a vertebrate and non-vertebrate host to complete its life cycle. M.
cerebralis is likely to persist in North America and is found in new places every year (Elwell,
2009). When high numbers of parasites are around susceptible fish, there can be high mortality
rates in native trout (Spaulding, 2007).
Much is already know about M. cerebralis and its salmonid host, yet less is understood
with regard to M. cerebralis and its T. tubifex host (Gilbert, 2003). T. tubifex is a common,
native freshwater worm that serves as the intermediate host for the myxozoan parasite and thus
7
is required for the whirling disease parasite to complete its life cycle. Many environmental
variables, including substrate properties, can influence habitat selection by tubificids, which has
produced conflicting results (McMurtry, 1983). Changes that affect T. tubifex abundance and
density thus have the potential to strongly affect downstream outcomes of whirling disease
(Minchella, 1991). What is less well understood is how and why changes in substrate influence
T. tubifex density.
Myxobolus Cerebralis lifecycle and requirements
Myxobolus has a two-stage life-cycle, consisting of triactinomyxons(TAMs) that infect
salmonids and develop in T. tubifex, and myxospores that infect T. tubifex develop in salmonids
(Wolf and Markiw, 1984). The life cycle of M. cerebralis starts when myxospores are released
from infected fish (Figure 1). Next, myxospores must be ingested by T. tubifex. The germ cell in
the myxospore then migrates to the intercellular space of the intestinal epithelium where it
undergoes reproduction and development into a TAM over a (70-120 day period). TAMs are
released from feces of T. tubifex and then enter the water column. TAMs are short-lived and
attach to fish and penetrate the skin. Once in the fish, reproduction takes place in the epidermis
and the parasites migrate through central nervous system to the associated cartridge where they
mature to plasmodia containing vegetative nuclei and generative cells. Approximately 80 days
after exposure to TAMs, the generative cells initiate sporogenesis to produce myxospores at
which stage whirling disease is manifested. The only way fish can become infected is if T.
tubifex ingest the myxospores and shed TAMs (Gilbert, 2003).
8
Figure 1: M. cerebralis lifecycle. Discus Club Romania, 2007
M. cerebralis infection timing is strongly tied to water temperature where disease
outbreak is strongly related to summer increases in water temperature (Allen, 2002). The ability
of M. cerebralis to complete its life-cycle in both hosts in order to produce both parasite spore
stages is critical for the continuation of the disease ( El- Matbouli, 1999).
Didymosphenia geminata
Didymosphenia geminata, a stalk-producing diatom, has increased in frequency
worldwide. Blooms of this algae have been reported in North America, Europe, Asia, and New
Zealand (Figure 2) and the diatom is believed to be expanding its geographic range in North
America where research is now just starting to be conducted (Spaulding, 2007). These single-
celled algal blooms result from excessive extracellular stalk production by individual cells that
form a contiguous mat covering the stream bottom (Spaulding, 2007). D. geminata is now
9
causing concern because of the possible impacts on rivers where blooms occur and on the
salmonid fisheries in these rivers; in particular, D. geminata blooms have the potential to alter
stream ecosystems by impacting the ecosystem’s metabolism, nutrient cycling, hydraulics and
food web (Spaulding 2007). The thick mats (e.g., 2-5 cm) that can cover much of the streambed
lead to changes in invertebrate species diversity and population sizes that may propagate up the
food web to affect fish populations (Spaulding, 2007). D. geminata forms thick mats that cover
>75% of the stream area and extend for 1 km, and may persist for several months of the year
(Spaulding, 2007). D. geminata cells produce copious amounts of extracellular stalk material
that form thick benthic mats, or blooms.
D. geminata thrives in a wide range of conditions such as both low-nutrient and high-
nutrient lakes and slow-moving shallow water to waters with greater depth and increased flow.
D. geminata mats alter the water velocity along the stream bottom in ways that may be
important to invertebrates such as oligochaetes that prefer slow-moving water and areas with
stable sediments (Larned, 2011). Hiner (2011) found that water flow rate has an effect on the
propagation of M. cerebralis, and habitats with lower velocity were found to promote higher
prevalence of infection and greater proliferation of the parasites invertebrate host T. tubifex
leading to greater severity of infection of whirling disease in fish (Hallett, 2007). D. geminata
may also provide a food source for T. tubifex by trapping particulate organic matter that is
readily colonized by bacteria, and D. geminata mats may also provide refuge for T. tubifex by
seeking protection from invertebrate hosts in the long stalks that D. geminata produces. D.
geminata is a good resource for T. tubifex due to their preference for fine silt and clay
substratum (i.e., depositional areas) that are areas with abundant microflora, which are a source
of bacterial food for oligochaetes (Kreuger, 2006).
10
Figure 2: World-wide distribution of records for D. geminata. Past and recent records show the
range expansion of D. geminata (Whitton, 2009).
Tubifex tubifex
T. tubifex is a habitat generalist and is extremely tolerant of a wide range of
environmental conditions (Kerans, 2002). McMurtry (1983) found a significant correlation
between abundance of heterotrophic aerobic bacteria in sediment and tubificid preference and
believes worms were attracted to the leaves because of the microfloras associated and provided
11
bacterial food. T. tubifex prefers silt and clay substratum to coarser substratum and have been
found to reproduce faster in silt sediment than other substrates (Arndt. Et al, 2002).
Trout
M. cerebralis affects several species of trout and salmon (Hoffman, 1990; Hedrick et al.,
1998; Gilbert and Granath, 2003). The infection of M. cerebralis that gives rise to whirling
disease has caused reductions in populations of rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, Yellowstone
cutthroat trout, brook trout, Chinook salmon, and kokanee salmon (Hedrick et al., 1998,
Macconnell and Vincent, 2002) The main sign of infection of whirling disease in salmonids is a
tail chasing behavior that causes the infected fish to whirl. As the disease progresses in the fish
skeletal deformation, misshaped heads, jaws and gill covers, and spinal curvature can develop
(Hnath, 1993).
The severity of the infection is evaluated by presence of clinical signs of whirling and or
a darkened caudal region, prevalence of infection, severity of microscopic lesions, and spore
counts 5 months after exposure (Hendrick, 1999). The development and severity of whirling
disease is known to be dependent on the age of fish when first exposed to the infective
triactinomyxon stage of Myxobolus cerebralis and the density of TAMs to which the fish are
exposed (Ryce, 2005). The time at which a salmonid is infected with M. cerebralis is crucial in
determining the likelihood and severity of infection. Ryce (2005) found that Rainbow trout must
be both 9 week post-hatch or older and at least 40 mm in fork length at time of exposure to
exhibit enhanced resistance to whirling disease.
12
Species Interactions
This study involved interactions among the algae, D. geminata, the oligochaete worm T.
tubifex, and the parasite M. cerebralis that is the causative agent of whirling disease in salmonid
fishes. M. cerebralis has a complex life cycle with two hosts and two intermediary spore stages
(Kerans, 2002). T. tubifex is one of the hosts in the two stage life cycle of Myxobolus cerebralis,
a myxozoan parasite that causes whirling disease in salmonid populations in the United States
(Gilbert, 2003). The myxozoan is spread by the death of infected salmonids near susceptible T.
tubifex and salmonids and it has been found that the death of just one infected salmonid upstream
is sufficient for establishment of M. cerebralis in a stream (Hallett, 2007).
T. tubifex distribution is strongly correlated to the distribution of leaf litter (Lazim, 1987)
and the deposition of fine particles (McMurtry et al, 1983; Bartholomew et al, 2005). Thus, D.
geminata has the potential to increase the available habitat for oligochaetes such as T. Tubifex,
and thereby increase the prevalence of M. cerebralis. Further, T. tubifex has been shown to itself
to be more abundant in streams with D. geminata mats (Kilroy et al, 2009). Moreover, brook
trout in streams with D. geminata blooms exhibit a higher M. cerebralis prevalence than brook
trout in streams without blooms (B. Taylor unpublished data).
Materials and Methods
Patterns of oligochaete abundance and D. geminata cover
To measure oligochaete abundance in relation to D. geminata cover in the East River of
Gothic, Colorado (Figure 3), I measured the percentage of the stream covered by algae with a
13
square-meter quadrant placed over various sections of the river. Assessment of algal cover was
made from each grid for a total percent of 0, 2, 5,35,55,90, and 95% D. geminata cover. Once
the percentage of algal cover was determined, sections of the sediments in the river were placed
into plastic bags and immediately filled with alcohol and red dye. Samples were then taken back
to the lab to be processed. This process was done by pouring the sample into a sifter and
finishing the collection and then placing the contents into a plastic tub to be sorted.
Macroinvertebrates were picked out with tweezers and placed into glass jars filled with alcohol
and labeled according the amount of D. geminata percentage cover that correlated with the
collection. Oligochaetes were then counted from the collection macroinvertebrates.
The relationship between the percent of D. geminata cover and the number of
oligochaetes found along a D. geminata cover gradient was calculated via a regression analysis
with oligochaete abundance as the response (e.g y-axis) variable and D.geminata cover as the
predictor, in order to determine how well cover might explain variation in oligochaetes.
D. geminata as a refuge from predation for T. tubifex
To test the hypothesis that D. geminata mats provides a refuge from invertebrate
predators for oligochaetes such as T. tubifex, I performed an experiment testing the effects of D.
geminata and the predatory stonefly Hesperoperla pacifica on T. tubifex mortality in Gothic,
Colorado on the upper East River near the Rocky Mountain Biological Lab. I used 80 streamside
flow-through tanks where stream water was gravity fed into the tanks from a stream located 200
m upslope draining the side of Gothic Mountain into the tanks inside of a portable weatherport. I
randomly assigned four treatments to each tank where twenty tanks received substrata covered
with polyester pillow stuffing to mimic the structural properties of D. geminata mats and one H.
14
pacifica stonefly, twenty tanks received substrata without the mimic material and one H. pacifica
stonefly, twenty tanks received substrata covered with the mimic material and no predators and
the remaining twenty tanks received substrata without the mimic material and no predators,
which served as controls for losses due to factors other than stonefly predation. Three T. tubifex
collected from the East River were added to each tank in the morning of 29 July 2013 and H.
pacifica collected from Avery Creek were added to specific predator assigned treatments three
hours later. After ~18 hours, I removed the stoneflies and counted the number of T. tubifex
remaining in each tank and whether they had been eaten, were dead, or were found to be bitten,
which was indicated by a bite mark out of T. tubifex by the stonefly. Because no T. tubifex were
dead or missing from the control treatments, and there was no significant block effect associated
with tank arrangement, I used a t-test to test for differences in stonefly-induced mortality
between treatments with and without the D. geminata mimic.
D. geminata as a stream flow refuge for T. tubifex
To test the degree to which D. geminata mats provide a refuge from high water velocity for
oligochaetes such as T. tubifex, I covered individual substrata with an artificial mimic of D.
geminata stalks and placed these substrata as well as substrata without the mimic in fast and slow
water velocity areas of the stream. Substrata were deployed for 3-4 weeks with the aim that the
number of oligochaetes colonizing would be quantified. Treatment rocks (8 mimic and 8 non-
mimic covered) were placed along a water velocity gradient (16 sites), to test the hypothesis that
diatom stalks provide a critical habitat or refuge especially at the fastest water velocities. I
predicted that oligochaetes would be more abundant on rocks with the mimic material, and that
the difference in number of oligochaetes between rocks with and without the mimic material
would be greatest at the fastest water velocities. Although data is still be counted, I plan to use an
15
ANCOVA to test for differences in oligochaete abundance between substrates with and without
mimic material along a water velocity gradient with water velocity as the covariate. A
significant interaction between water velocity and substrate type would suggest that D. geminata
is an important refuge or habitat for oligochaetes in fast flowing streams.
Figure 3: East River and Copper Creek field sites at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
in Gothic, Colorado.
16
Results
Patterns of oligochaete abundance and D. geminata cover
Oligochaete abundance increased along D. geminata cover gradient in the East River
(Figure 4 and 5). A regression analysis was done to show the variation of invertebrates found in
various samples, and the results showed that there is a relationship in the percentage of D.
geminata and the oligochaetes found per square meter.
Table 1: Number of oligochaetes found in relation to the percent of D. geminata cover.
Percent of D. geminata
cover
N # oligochaetes
found
0% cover 1 0
2% cover 1 0
5 % cover 1 2
35 % cover 1 1
55 % cover 1 3
90% cover 1 9
95% cover 2 1.5
17
Figure 5: Relationship between percent of D. geminata cover and number of oligochaetes found
along a D. geminata cover gradient. (R^2=0.5321, P-value=0.0628). Given the order of
magnitude differences in the response values, the y- axis was log 10 transformed to show that the
oligochaetes found per square meter most closely follows an exponential increase with a linear
increase in a percentage of D. geminata cover. The p-value is marginal, and although we cannot
falsify the hypothesis of no relationship between cover and oligochaete abundance, we also lack
power given our sampling.
R^2=0.5321, P-value=0.0628
18
Figure 6: The stonefly H. pacifica consumed, killed, or injured nearly twice as few T. tubifex in
treatments with the D. geminata mimic relative to treatments without D. geminata mimic (t38 =
3.19, P = 0.0014; Fig. 4). This data shows that the rocks that were covered in D. geminata mimic
were beneficial to the survival of T. tubifex from the stonefly H. pacifica. The body size of H.
pacifica was not different between treatments (t38 = 0.43, P = 0.6).
T38=3.19, P=0.0014
19
Table 2: East River Flow Refuge Experiment Table
Multiple variables were measured in the East River for the flow refuge experiment.
(Mean: Depth: 0.26m, Velocity0.25 m/s, Temperature: 15.32 c, Mimic rock: 208.4cm, Non-
mimic rock: 200.93 cm)
Rock Number Water Depth
(Meters)
Water
Velocity
(Meters per
second)
Water
Temperature
(Degrees
Celsius)
Distance from
shore of
mimic rock
(centimeters)
Distance
from shore
of non-
mimic rock
(centimeters)
1 0.21 m 0.0983 m/s 15.41 50 cm 69 cm
2 0.22 m 0.0575 m/s 15.53 70 cm 83 cm
3 0.21 m 0.0001 m/s 15.54 112 cm 135 cm
4 0.22 m 0.022 m/s 15.92 110 cm 100 cm
5 0.22 m 0.4354 m/s 15.48 197 cm 161 cm
6 0.21 m 0.4511 m/s 15.34 335 cm 301 cm
7 0.19 m 0.0195 m/s 15.26 70 cm 46 cm
8 0.22 m 0.3325 m/s 15.23 283 cm 306 cm
9 0.22 m 0.4749 m/s 15.18 225 cm 210 cm
10 0.2 m 0.3379 m/s 15.15 335 cm 305 cm
11 0.23 m 0.7513 m/s 15.1 423 cm 423 cm
12 0.2 m 0.0398 m/s 15.12 38 cm 65 cm
13 0.24 m 0.1399 m/s 15.13 585 cm 565 cm
14 0.24 m 0.2847 m/s 15.2 148 cm 133 cm
15 0.2 m 0.3048 m/s 15.22 145 cm 112 cm
20
Table 3: Summary of disease drivers in main species involved in whirling disease. This table
lists species that play major roles in whirling disease, the top five ecological drivers that
influence the success of each species, which in turn could contribute to the prevalence of
whirling disease.
1-20 Spaulding, 2007, Larned, 2011, Whitton, 2009, Kilroy, 2009, McMurty, 1983, Kerans, 2004,
Lazim, 1987, Kruger, 2006, Hallett, 2007, Hiner, 2001, Hallett, 2007, Allen, 2002, Gilbert,
2003, El-Matbouli, 1999, Ryce, 2005, Hoffman, 1990, Schlister, 2002, Hendrick, 1999, Nickum,
1999, Nehring, 2006
D. geminata T. tubifex M. cerebralis Trout
Habitat preference
1,2
Habitat preference
2,4,5,6,7,8
Water flow
9
Age and size of trout
at time of infection
12,15
Season length
1,3
Susceptibility of
infection
9
Lifespan of spores
6
Prevalence of M.
cerebralis is water
1,15, 16
Range expansion
1,3,4
Presence of D.
geminata
4
Water temperature
12
Time and means of
stocking
15,17
Stalk length
1
Water velocity
10
Susceptible T. Tubifex
9
Severity of infection
18,19
Means of introduction
1,4
Heterotrophic bacteria
in sediment
5,8
Actinospore- Triactinomyxon
lifecycle
6,13,14
Drainage Location
20
21
Discussion
The impact of an invasive diatom on oligochaetes and their predators
This study focused on the effects of the diatom D. geminata on the intermediate host of
whirling disease, T. tubifex. I asked two questions – does D. geminata cover impact abundance
of T. tubifex and if so, is part of the explanation for this relationship based on predator avoidance
potential afforded by the diatom were tested experimentally at the Rocky Mountain Biological
Lab. Percent of D. geminata cover present did have an effect on abundance of oligochaetes. This
pattern of increased abundance of oligochaetes could be explained by the habitat preference of
oligochaetes to fine particles that D. geminata mats trap (Larned, 2011).
The predator refuge experiment data illustrates that treatments with the D. geminata
mimic did provide a refuge for T. tubifex from the predatory stonefly H. pacifica. The higher
mortality rate of T. tubifex in treatments without the D. geminata mimic shows that T. tubifex
was found eaten, dead, or bitten more often due to a lack of protective environment in which to
find refuge. The patterns observed in a controlled experimental setting illustrate the habitat
refuge that D. geminata may be providing for oligochaetes in East River from predatory
stoneflies.
Multiple variables were measured in the East River for the flow refuge experiment. Based
on my hypothesis that T. tubifex finds a refuge in D. geminata from fast moving streams, it was
important to measure variables of the rock sites to make conclusions about which areas of the
stream had a higher velocity and depth that could be contributing to the amount of variables that
could be contributing to T. tubifex finding refuge in D. geminata. Final data on oligochaete count
22
is currently being processed by Dr. Brad Taylor. The predicted results are that there will be a
higher number of oligochaetes found on mimic D. geminata rocks than non-mimic D. geminata
rocks
Prior to my work, and based on preliminary work in Rocky Mountain Biological Lab, it
was known that the continued spread of D. geminata may impact abundances of T. tubifex, but it
was not known if this was related to changing habitats, or reduced predation, or both. My work
shows that both are likely to be happening, at least at the site I chose to examine. One outcome
is that simple measures of cover percent in relation to oligochaete abundance was a somewhat
weak result, perhaps dependent on sampling, compared to the predator experiments. More
systematic experiments may be needed to properly determine how and how much oligochaete
abundance changes are related to different predictors
Ecological Drivers
While M. cerebralis has been found in many watersheds in the US, distribution and
severity of whirling disease on fish populations vary regionally and locally (Nickum, 1999). A
main finding from my literature review related to disease prevalence and severity is that habitat
factors act synergistically across different species – warming, for example, may lead to both
increased algal invasions and increased amount of D. geminata, while also benefiting the
myxozoan parasite. How these timing events play out with regard to resistance of the trout
remains one of many unanswered questions that deserve further study, perhaps using forecasting
approaches based on a more formal model that can be constructed based on my initial assembly
of drivers presented here.
23
The best current way to manage the disease is for fish to be raised in a M. cerebralis
spore-free source of water, or in a farm setting, they need to be constantly monitored for the
presence of spores (Hoffman, 1990). Another means of managing the disease is the elimination
of susceptible T. tubifex, the parasite's alternate host, and their habitat, which could interrupt the
parasite's life cycle and prevent fish infections.
Each of the species that interact in this system play a key role in whirling disease. Further
research on parasite, hosts, and habitats that support them will be necessary to better understand
whirling disease outbreaks and to meet the goals of management or eradication of the disease.
Also needed is further research on the genetics of M. cerebralis infection in relation to
susceptible T. tubifex, and whether ecological or genetic variation within oligochaete host
populations may be responsible for determining whirling disease risk in a body of water (Kerans,
2004). In addition, examination how D. geminata will expand its range with a changing climate
and continue to alter ecosystem structure will be critical for forecasting how T. tubifex
populations may grow. These efforts may provide a data and analysis driven basis for decision
about how to manage watersheds.
The Bigger Picture of Whirling Disease: Towards A More Conceptual Model
Although I only covered a small piece of the larger puzzle related to whirling disease,
part of my Honors work was developing a larger-picture of how the different players and their
interactions may drive disease emergence and persistence and the directionality (positive or
negative effects on the disease) with the goal of documenting best- case and worst-case scenarios
for the spread of the disease. The ecological drivers above and some information about strength
of interactions and impacts allow me to assemble some initial ideas about change dynamics. For
24
example, a worst-case scenario would involve warming temperatures that may allow D.
geminata to continue blooming, with its filaments reaching their maximum length (Spaulding,
2007). Abundance of D. geminata would create a yet more suitable habitat for T. tubifex (Lazim
and Learner, 1983). At the same time, warming temperatures would also benefit the myxozoan
parasite given its preference for activity in warmer conditions (Allen, 2002).
Management solutions that could implement best-case scenarios for avoiding whirling
disease outbreak would involve partially controlling D. geminata in order to limit T. tubifex
prevalence across sites. Further, year-round cooler water temperature would further limit both
D. geminata and M. cerebralis, as would stocking streams at 9 weeks old or older so they would
be less likely to be affected by M. cerebralis if there happened to be any left in the water (Ryce,
2005).
25
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted first and foremost thanks to my parents William and Allyson Byle
for introducing me to the Rocky Mountain Biological Lab. I would like to thank Dr. Brad Taylor
from Dartmouth College for the intellectual design of the field component of this study at The
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory. I would like to thank my primary advisor, Dr. Robert
Guralnick at the University of Colorado Boulder for all of his assistance in the conceptual model
of this project and his unconditional support during this process. I would like to thank Barbara
Demmig-Adams for her support through the honors program and Dr. Diane Mcknight for serving
on my honors committee. I would like to acknowledge Dr. Alexander Cruz and Dr. David Stock
for their recommendations to the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory where the field
component of this project took place. Thank you to Dr. Jennifer Reithel, Dr. Emily Mooney,
Shannon Sprott, and Billy Barr for all of their support at The Rocky Mountain Biological
Laboratory. Finally, last but certainty not least, a special thank you to the Rocky Mountain
Biological Laboratory donors for their assistance in the funding of this project.
26
Literature Cited
Allen, B., Bergersen, E. 2002. Factors influencing the distribution of Myxobolus cerebralis, the
causative agent of whirling disease, in the Cache la Poudre River, Colorado. Diseases of
Aquatic Organisms 49(1):51-60.
Arndt, R. E., E. J. Wagner, Q. Cannon, and M. Smith. 2002. TAM production as related to
rearing substrate and diel light cycle. Whirling disease: reviews and current topics. Pages
87-92.
El-Matbouli, M. McDowell, TS., 1999. Effect of water temperature on the development, release
and survival of the triactinomyxon stage of Myxobolus cerebralis in its oligochaete
host. International Journal for Parasitology. 29(4):627–641.
Gilbert, M and Granath, W. 2003. Whirling disease of salmonid fish: Life cycle, biology and
disease. Journal of Parasitology. 89(4): 658-667.
Gilbert M, and Granath W. Jr,. 2007. Epizootiology of Myxobolus cerebralis, the causative agent
of salmonid whirling disease in the Rock Creek drainage of west-central Montana.
J Parasitol. 93(1):104-19.
Hallett, S., and Bartholomew, J. 2007. effects of water flow on the infection dynamics of
myxobolus cerebralis. Parasitology 135:371-384.
Hnath, JG. 1993. Whirling disease. Great Lakes fisheries comission. Chapter 27/ Fisheries
Section. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Mattawan. MI.
Hiner, M., and C. M. Moffitt. 2001. Variation in Myxobolus cerebralis infections in field-
exposed cutthroat and rainbow trout in Idaho. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 13:124-
132.
Hendrick.R, Mcdowell, T., 1999. Comparative susceptibility of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus
mykiss and brown trout Salmo trutta to Myxobolus cerebralis, the cause of salmonid
whirling disease. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 37(3):173-183.
Hoffman, G L 1990. Myxobolus cerebralis, a Worldwide Cause of Salmonid Whirling Disease
Journal of Aquatic Animal Health. 2(1):30-37.
Kerans, B. Zale, A. 2002. The Ecology of Myxobolus cerebralis. American Fisheries Society
Symposium. 29:145-166.
Kerans BL, Rasmussen C. 2004. Differential propagation of the metazoan parasite Myxobolus
cerebralis by Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri, Ilyodrilus templetoni, and genetically distinct
strains of Tubifex tubifex. Journal of parasitology. 90(6):1366-73.
27
Kilroy, C, Larned ST, and Biggs BJF. 2009. The non-indigenous diatom Didymosphenia
geminata alters benthic communities in New Zealand rivers. Freshwater Biology 54:
1990-2002
Krueger, R., Kerans, 2006. Risk of Myxobolus Cerebralis Infection To Rainbow Trout In The
Madison River, Montana, USA. Ecological Applications 16:770–783.
Lazim, M., Learner,M. 1987 The influence of sediment composition and leaf litter on the
distribution of tubificid worms (Oligochaeta) Oecologia.72(1):131-136.
Larned, ST, Packman AI, Plew DR, and Vopel K. 2011. Interactions between the mat-forming
alga Didymosphenia geminata and its hydrodynamic environment. Limnology &
Oceanography: Fluids & Environments 1: 4-22.
Lemmon, J. C., and B.L. Kerans. 2001. Extraction of whirling disease myxospores from
sediments using the plankton centrifuge and sodium hexametaphosphate. Intermountain
Journal of Sciences 7:57-62.
McGinnis, S., and Kerans, B. 2013. Land use and host community characteristics as predictors of
disease risk. Landscape Ecology. 28(1):29-44.
McMurtry, M., Rapport, D. 1983. Substrate Selection by Tubificid Oligochaetes. Canadian
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40:1639-1646, 10.1139/f83-190.
Minchella, D.J., and M. E. Scott. 1991. Parasitism: a cryptic detriment of animal community
structure. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 6: 250-254.
Nehring, R.B. 2006. Colorado’s cold water fisheries: whirling disease case histories and insights
for risk management. Special Report Number 79. Colorado Division of Wildlife
Nehring, R.B., and K.G. Thompson. 2003. Whirling disease investigations. Colorado Division of
Wildlife, Final Report, Federal Aid Project F-237-R-10. Fort Collins.
Nickum,D. 1999. Whirling disease in the United States: A summary of progress in research and
management. Trout unlimited Report, Trout Unlimited, Arlington, Virginia, 36 p.
Reynoldson, Trefor. 1987. The role of environmental factors in the ecology of tubificid
oligochaetes- an experimental study. Holarctic Ecology 10: 241-248
Ryce, E, Zale, A..2005. Effects of fish age versus size on the development of whirling disease
in rainbow trout. Aquatic Organisms. 63(1):69-76.
Schisler,G., Bergersen, E. 2002. Evaluation of risk of high elevation Colorado waters to the
establishment of Myxobolus cerebralis. American Fisheries Society Symposium 29:33-41.
28
Spaulding, S.A., Elwell, L. 2007. Increase in Nuisance Blooms and Geographic Expansion of the
Freshwater Diatom Didymosphenia geminata. USGS.
Whitton, B A. 2009. Biology of the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia: a review
Journal: Hydrobiologia. 630(1) DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-9753-5
Wolf,K., Markiw, M. 1984. Biology contravenes taxonomy in the myxozoa: new discoveries
show alternation of invertebrate and vertebrate hosts. Science. 225(4669):1449-52.