ecological research in papua new guinea: some …
TRANSCRIPT
ECOLOGICAL RESEARCHIN PAPUA NEW GUINEA:
Some important and interesting problems
Vojtech Novotny and collaborators
BiodiversityLandPNG
Others
What makes Papua New Guinea important and special inbiodiversity research?
- Large species richness- High level of species endemism- Low environmental destruction
Temperate forests:
low diversitywoody plants: 5 - 20 species per ha
Tropical forests:
high diversitywoody plants: 100 - 800 species per ha
Papua New Guinea:low population densitylarge forest areas
Why are there so many species in the tropical areas?
How can so many species survive at a single site?
How species influence one another in the ecosystem?
Our study:
Species-rich group - insect herbivoresand their interaction with host plant species
Parataxonomist Training Center:main station & 3 field laboratories, 1 researcher,15 parataxonomists, 3 postgraduate students,30 village assistants
Rubiaceae
Psychotria
Plant - herbivore interactions: plant species selected for the study
asterids
Ficus
Moraceae
eurosids I
Macaranga
Euphorbiaceae
eurosids II
Host specificity of fruit flies 8,000 fruit flies reared from 600 kg of fruits from 170 plant spp.
Host specificity of Cerambycidae2,500 beetles reared from 3,000 kgof timber from 10 tree spp.(ongoing study; target 40 tree spp.)
Host specificity of caterpillars60,000 caterpillars collected and20,000 reared from 90 tree species
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
caterpillars cerambycids fruit flies caterpillars cerambycids fruit flies
specialists others
Congeneric hosts Allofamilial hots
Herbivores on large plant genera:low specificity with respect to congeneric hosts
Ficus 135 spp.in New Guinea(global maximum)
Large generaare prominentin tropical floras
0
3000
6000
9000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Cumulative no. of genera
Cum
ulat
ive
no. o
f spe
cies
Flora of PNG
Caterpillar assemblages on rainforest trees:- high dominance by a single or few species- low spatial variability (across 1-25 km distances)- low seasonality
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >10
Species rank
Dom
inan
ce
Similarity between caterpillar communities from different hosts
A sample of 300 caterpillars per host tree is enough
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 300 600 900
No. of individuals per host
Sim
ilarit
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
No.
of s
peci
es (-
x-)
Sorentsen PS NESS Species
Macaranga quadriglandulosa x M. aleuritoides
Caterpillar assemblages on rainforest trees arepredictable and amenable to study
300 caterpillars per host:20 person-days of sampling60 person-days of rearing, sorting, mounting, databasing
Caterpillars from the 151 species of woody plants from1 ha of the rainforest:10 persons working for 5 years + taxonomic work
Possible studies using caterpillar assemblages on rainforesttrees as the units of analysis:
• species turnover between locally coexisting assemblages ondifferent host tree species• species turnover between assemblages on a particular tree speciesalong environmental gradients (e.g. altitudinal)• species turnover between assemblages on a particular tree species ina particular habitat on large spatial scales• species turnover between assemblages on native and invasive treespecies• etc.• etc.• etc.
1 ha of secondaryvegetation:196 woody species,including 55 species(83 % of total biomass)studied for caterpillars 1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
0 50 100 150 200
Species rank
Bas
al a
rea
[mm
2]
caterpillarsstudiednot studied
Plant community from 1 ha of secondary forest
Young secondary vegetation:
a synthesis of a compoundcaterpillar assemblage fromassemblages feeding onindividual tree species
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >10
Species rank
Dom
inan
ce
Individual tree speciesCompound secondary vegetation
0
20
40
60
80
1 2-5 >5
No. of host plant families
No.
of s
peci
es0
250
500
750
1000
No.
of i
ndiv
idua
ls
SpeciesIndividuals
Compound caterpillar assemblage on secondary vegetation
Prominent position ofcaterpillars specialised toa single host family:
Lower dominance in the compoundassemblage compared to assemblageson individual host tree species
0
20
40
60
80
0 500 1000 1500
No. of individuals
No.
of s
peci
es
020406080
100120140160
1 2 3-5 6-10 >10
No. of host families
No. o
f spe
cies
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Prop
ortio
n of
col
onis
ers
Piper aduncum:• invaded 20-30 years ago• presently the most abundantspecies in secondary forests
• Abundance and species richness ofcaterpillars on Piper aduncum iscomparable to native hosts• Almost all polyphagous caterpillarsfrom native hosts quickly colonisedPiper aduncum
Caterpillars on alien vs. native hosts
Ficus wassa
Lowland rainforest 100 m asl. Montane rainforest 1,800 m asl.
Beta-diversity along an altitudinal gradient:
Caterpillars feeding on identical hosts(Ficus wassa, F. copiosa and F. dammaropsis)in lowland and montane rainforests
Field laboratory in Mu Village (1,800 m asl.):caterpillar studies along an altitudinal gradient
Species turnover in caterpillar assemblages feeding onFicus wassa, copiosa and dammaropsisalong an 1,700 m altitudinal gradient:
>90%
Asota versicolor: MONTANE & LOWLAND
Philiris sp.: MONTANE only
Euploea leucosticos: LOWLAND only
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Choreutid
ae
Crambidae
Lym
antrii
dae
Tortrici
dae
Lycae
nidae
Nymphali
dae
others
% o
f ind
ivid
uals
MONTANELOWLAND
Montane & lowland caterpillarsfeeding on Ficus trees:different species recruitedfrom identical higher taxa
Beta-diversity across large expanses of lowland rainforests:is there any?
THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS:• prominent role of large plant genera in forest vegetation• low host specificity with respect to congeneric hosts• absence of dispersal barriers in the lowlands
40 % of all fruit fly species known fromNew Guinea found at a single lowland site
EMPIRICAL PATTERNS:• high local/regional ratio of species richness
Beta-diversity across large expanses of lowland rainforests:a proposed study in 900 km2 of Sepik & Ramu river basins
Target: 5,000 caterpillars from each siteTeam: 1 researcher, 4 parataxonomists,15 village assistantsTime schedule: 3 months per siteKey innovation:extensive use of assistance by local villagers
Beta diversity of caterpillars on hosts from large genera• 12 hosts from Ficus, Syzigium, Macaranga & Psychotria• local & widespread hosts included from each genus• 9 sites within a 600 x 200 km lowland area Local plant names:
Ficus wassatinamsinamtombetombeasetawidonkusakamwarasokoquanjangaletiam
Wannang Insect Laboratories Ltd.
Further information:• Web page www.entu.cas.cz/png/index.html• New book (February 2003): Basset, Y., Novotny, V., Miller, S.E. & Kitching. R.(eds.) Arthropods of Tropical Forests: Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use inthe Canopy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.• Key papers - Novotny V., Basset, Y., Miller, S.E. et al. (2002):• Nature 416, 841-844• Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 400-412• Proc. Royal Society, London, Biol. Sci. 269, 2337-2344.
How to obtain additional information:visit Papua New Guinea!
Acknowledgements: parataxonomists Kenneth Molem, William Boen, John Auga, RichardKutil, Brus Isua, Markus Manumbor, Martin Mogia, Elvis Tamtiai, Max Manaono, MarkAndreas, Borenke Kaupa, Joseph Kua, Chris Dal, Roll Lilip, Martin Kasbal, Micah Damag,Samuel Hiuk, researchers Solomon Balagawi, Lawong Balun, Mark Ero, Lance Hill Jan Leps,Lukas Cizek, Pavel Drozd, Milan Janda, Jiri Hulcr, Sim Sar, Alan Stewart, Wayne Takeuchi,Roger Kitching, Karie Darrow, Kipiro Damas, funding agencies the National ScienceFoundation, Darwin Initiative, Czech Grant Agency, Packard Foundation, Otto Kinne Foundation& Papua New Guinea Biological Foundation, institutions University of Papua New Guinea,PNG University of Technology, PNG National Agriculture Research Institute, SmithsonianInstitution, Czech Academy of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, University of Minnesota,University of Sussex, Bishop Museum & Natural History Museum London.