econ 208 marek kapicka lecture 12 ricardian equivalence
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Econ 208
Marek KapickaLecture 12
Ricardian Equivalence
![Page 2: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Psets and Reading
Read “The Mythology of deficits” by Landsburg and Feinstone (on the web)
Read chapter 14 for this week PS 4 will be posted today
![Page 3: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Where are we? Introduction: A model with no Government The Effects of Government Spending Government Taxation and Government Debt
Labor Taxation Taxation and Redistribution Government debt
![Page 4: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Government Debt
1) The Data 2) Ricardian Equivalence Theorem
Gov’t Debt does not matter ! 3) Ramsey Problem
Find the optimal debt level if taxes are distortionary and RET fails
![Page 5: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Consumers
Budget constraints
Utility
srtyc
tysc
)1('''
)',( ccU
![Page 6: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Lifetime wealth
Define lifetime wealth as present value of a disposable income
Then lifetime budget constraint says that present value of consumption is equal to lifetime wealth
r
tt
r
yywe
1
'
1
'
wer
cc
1
'
![Page 7: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
A Consumer Who Is a Lender
![Page 8: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
A Consumer Who Is a Borrower
![Page 9: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Government Current period budget constraint
Future period budget constraint
Present value budget constraint
BtG
')1(' tBrG
r
tt
r
GG
1
'
1
'
![Page 10: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Competitive Equilibrium
Consumers choose c,c’,s optimally, given r
Government PVBC holds Interest rate such that the credit
market clears: Bs
![Page 11: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ricardian Equivalence
Suppose the government cuts taxes by $600:
![Page 12: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Ricardian Equivalence
You should also get a second letter:
There is no change in your wealth!!
Dear Taxpayer:
We are sorry to inform you that the present value of your future tax liabilities has increased by the amount of $600.
![Page 13: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Ricardian Equivalence Theorem
The Ricardian Equivalence Theorem:
If all government spending is held constant, then a change in current taxes
leaves the equilibrium interest rate and the consumption of individuals unchanged
![Page 14: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Ricardian Equivalence with a Cut in Current Taxes for a Borrower
![Page 15: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Implications of Ricardian Equivalence
Tax cut is not a free lunch! Timing of gov’t taxes does not
matter Deficits do not matter!
![Page 16: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Failure of Ricardian Equivalence
1. If people are heterogeneous, they might not be affected equally
Some people may receive larger tax cuts than others and their lifetime wealth may change
That is, there is a redistribution of wealth across people
![Page 17: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Failure of Ricardian Equivalence
2. Debt may not be repaid during the lifetimes of the people who received tax cuts
There is a redistribution of wealth across generations
Example: Social Security
![Page 18: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Failure of Ricardian Equivalence
3. Credit markets are not perfect People may face borrowing limits. In
such case, a tax cut will not be saved
People may face higher interest rate than government. In such case, a tax cut will increase present value of their resources and increase consumption
![Page 19: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Failure of Ricardian Equivalence
4. Taxes are not lump sum If taxes cause distortions, then
timing of taxes does matter A government may want to spread
the distortions across all periods
![Page 20: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Example of RI: George Bush, 1992
George Bush, 1992: change in tax withholding Taxes were deferred until April 1993 Total size: $25 billion
Hope: consumers will increase spending
Result: consumption didn't change much
Didn't know Ricardian Equivalence...
![Page 21: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Real Consumption of Durables, 1991–
1993
![Page 22: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Real Consumption of Nondurables,
1991–1993
![Page 23: Econ 208 Marek Kapicka Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022032313/56649e595503460f94b52900/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Real Consumption of Services, 1991–
1993