econ 980o: health, education and development lecture 1 september 18, 2008
DESCRIPTION
Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008. Basics. Class: Thursday 2:00-4:00 Instructor: Erica Field Office: Littauer M30 Office Hours: Friday 1:30-3:30 TF: Vanya Pasheva Office: TBA Office Hours: TBA Section: TBA. What this course is about. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development
Lecture 1September 18, 2008
![Page 2: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Basics
Class: Thursday 2:00-4:00
Instructor: Erica FieldOffice: Littauer M30Office Hours: Friday 1:30-3:30
TF: Vanya PashevaOffice: TBAOffice Hours: TBA
Section: TBA
![Page 3: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What this course is about
• Micro-foundations of poverty and economic development
• What health and education have in common:
– Human Capital
• Stock of skills and attributes embodied in people that raises labor productivity
![Page 4: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Why do development economists care so much about human capital?
(1) In practice, big difference between developed & developing countries: School and literacy low, and burden of disease disproportionately high in developing countries
Much of this disease burden preventable (in theory)- In 1990, 41% of deaths due to infectious diseases
(diarrhoeal disease, pneumonia, TB)
→ Room for policy intervention
![Page 5: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“Macro” motivation - growth accounting:
(2) In theory, human capital accumulation one of the important sources of long-run economic growth
– Endogenous growth theories rely on understanding labor productivity and innovation, and hence human capital
![Page 6: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Empirical evidence:
Recent periods of sustained growth in total factor productivity (TFP) and reduced poverty in low-income countries closely associated with improvements in a country’s:
– Child nutrition– Adult health – Schooling
![Page 7: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
“Micro” motivation:
(3) Education and health correlated with ...
• Migration• Faster adoption of new (profitable) technologies• Child wellbeing• Marriage choices• Fertility• …..nearly everything you can think of
So important for understanding poverty dynamics
![Page 9: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Key questions we’ll address in class: In practice, what are best ways to increase human capital formation in developing countries (and thereby encourage growth)?
– What are relative returns to various types of human capital inputs?
– What are institutional or political barriers to human capital formation?
– Are there important psychological or cultural barriers to human capital formation?
– How do we design policies to motivate investment in health and education?
![Page 10: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Brief overview of course topics:
(1) What are the returns to human capital?
Motivation:
How much should we prioritize these over other poverty alleviation strategies?
Topics covered:• Labor market returns to health and schooling• Effect of health on schooling• Effect of education on mortality
![Page 11: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Brief overview of course topics:(2) What are determinants of health and education production?
Motivation: What interventions will be most effective in improving health
and education outcomes in developing countries?
Topics covered• Is health a normal good (how much will health improve with
income)?• Intra-household inequality and child investments• Gender differences and “missing women”• Impact of information on health behavior• Education production• Teachers and teacher incentives• Political barriers to human capital investment
![Page 12: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Primary objectives of class: • Get you started on careful empirical research
– Not only what are the key questions in health, education and development, but how do we figure out the answers
– Think critically about measurement/data issues
– Start thinking critically about how to estimate causal relationships instead of simple correlations
– Expose you to range of empirical methods
– Methods we’ll discuss: Regression methods, experimental approaches, natural experiments, instrumental variables, “difference in difference” estimation
![Page 13: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Who should take this class: • Juniors thinking about senior thesis topics
• Anyone interested in research methods (e.g. graduate school)
• Anyone interested in exploring development policy questions
• Anyone else interested in the topic!
• Caveat: Need some past exposure to economics and econometrics
![Page 14: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Assignments
• Readings
– Read ~2 journal article for each class
– Come prepared!
– Use reading guide to prepare for discussion
![Page 15: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Reading guide questions:
Estimation strategy:
• How do authors establish causality (what is identification strategy)?
• Is the approach valid? If not, why not?
• What is most significant measurement challenge (i.e. selection bias, reporting bias) and how is it addressed?
![Page 16: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Reading guide questions:
Criticism:
• How do findings contribute to our understanding of health, education or human behavior?
• What is most important question left unanswered?
• What is most important policy implication of the findings?
• What is leading alternative explanation for their findings?
• Are the data and measurements reliable?– Bigger problem than you would think!
![Page 17: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Evaluation:
– 10 weekly assignments (40%)
– Research paper (50%)• First draft (25%)• Final draft (25%)
– Class participation (10%)
![Page 18: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Weekly assignments
(Not as bad as it sounds!)
– Many just detailed review of class reading
• Next week:– Read Field, Robles and Torero article– Answer questions like the ones we just saw
– 3 problem sets designed around practice using Stata
– Second half of semester, assignments will ask for parts of your research paper
![Page 19: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Research paper
• ~20 pages
• Empirical study of topic related to class content
• Should be used to explore potential thesis areas of interest
• Look for ideas in readings
• Discuss ideas with instructor and Vanya
• Note: No way to get behind – draft due early!
![Page 20: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Examples of appropriate paper topics:
– Look for narrow question with a YES or NO answer
– Think about testable predictions from simple economic models
• A lot of important work begins with a search for the obvious, since data frequently show something different
![Page 21: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Appropriate paper topics:
– Changes over time or differences across areas in school or health policies
– Differences in disease climate or nutrition driven by geography
– Cross-country or within-country differences in social norms or institutions
– Impact of climate shocks (rainfall), other unanticipated events
![Page 22: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Specific examples:
– Do returns to primary school vary with opportunities for farming technology adoption?
– Do changes in life expectancy influence marriage age?
– Is disease environment correlated with fertility preferences?
– How does nutrition influence labor market earnings?
![Page 23: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Prime example: health and income
The challenge of causal estimation:
(why the last question is so hard to answers)
![Page 24: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Income–health gradient:
• Striking consistency in the association between poverty and poor health across diverse array of existing studies
• Generally robust to variation in– Measurement of poverty, health– Geographical focus– Time– Within- or across countries
![Page 25: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The changing relationship between life expectancy and income (Preston, 1976)
![Page 26: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Strauss and Thomas 1999
2.252.25
22
1.751.75
1.51.5
1.251.25
1.251.25
11
.75.75
.5.5
.25.25
160160 170170 180180 190190
United States
Brazil
HeightCMS
ln (wages) in Brazil ln (wages) in USA
Within-country cross-sectional variation: Relationship between Adult Height and Earnings
![Page 27: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
3 possible explanations for basic association between health and wealth:
(1) Health leads to improvements in income and economic growth
HEALTH WEALTH
“Improvement in nutrition and health may account for as much as 30 percent of the growth in conventionally measured per capita income between 1790 and 1980 in Western Europe.” R.W. Fogel 1990
![Page 28: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
What are potential pathways?Direct productivity outcomes:
– Good health increases labor market productivity of adults
– Child health leads to better cognitive skills, higher productivity of schooling
– Public health externalities
• Disease spreads! So there are important spillovers of one person’s health to another’s
![Page 29: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Health as human capital investment
(i.e. Health to wealth via capital accumulation)
Lower life expectancy leads to:
– Lower investment in education
– Lower savings rates
– Change in population age structure
![Page 30: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
3 possible explanations for association:
(2)Income leads to improvements in health
WEALTH HEALTH
![Page 31: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
What are potential pathways?
Society level: (government expenditures on public health):
– Disease control – Sanitation
Individual level:
– Health investment (vaccinations)– Better nutrition– Health care – Indirect effects:
• Education (leads to better health information)• Housing• Lifestyle choices
![Page 32: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
3 possible explanations for association:
(3) Third factor explains both
Like what?
• Political climate (e.g. stability, civil war)
• Culture (e.g. technology adoption)
• Geography (e.g. climate, isolation)
![Page 33: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Big question:
• How do we disentangle these three pathways?
We’ll spend the semester thinking about this and similar questions…
![Page 34: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Aside: change over time in focus of discussion
“The influence of economic conditions on mortality has been recognized at least since biblical times.” Preston, 1976
In contrast, health to wealth relatively modern issue:
“I disregard here the few works which deal with the relatively minor effect of mortality on economic processes.” Preston, 1976
![Page 35: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Today’s Class:
How do we isolate causal effect of health on income?
![Page 36: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Once again, multiple potential pathways:
Direct productivity outcomes:– Good health increases labor market productivity– Child health increases productivity of schooling – Ill health has large externalities
Lower life expectancy :– Reduces investment in education– Reduces savings rates– Increases population growth
To test theory, need to isolate particular channel
This class: Does adult nutrition raise labor productivity?
![Page 37: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
What’s thought to matter:Energy (caloric content)
Specific nutrients:Iron (thought to be most important)
Deficiency leads to:
• Cognitive defects in children• Maternal deaths due to severe anemia• Decreased day-to-day productivity
Vitamin A
Deficiency associated with:
• Decreased resistance to infection
Iodine (next class)
![Page 38: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Why is effect of nutrition on productivity relevant for scientific theory?
• Many scientific theories of bio-nutrition (specific nutrients protect health and increase physical functioning), not very good human evidence
• Evidence from lab experiments on rats, but not so straightforward to scale up in humans
• Bottom line: Lots of potentially beneficial policy interventions, hard to say what matters most, particularly with combinations of nutrients, age-specific importance
![Page 39: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Why is bionutrition relevant for economic theory?
Nutrition and labor productivity:
• One leading hypothesis: Efficiency wage model (Ray, Chapters 8,13)
• If nutrition important for productivity, could explain why so much surplus labor in developing countries
– Surplus labor: Unemployment at the same time as MPL>0 (positive, rigid wages)
• Potentially important source of poverty traps (why we don’t see GDP convergence as predicted by growth theory)
![Page 40: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Poverty traps:
• In a poverty trap, you’re poor because you’re sick and you’re sick because you’re poor …
• Example of a health poverty trap: – Minimum calories needed for employment
• What that means for a model of economic growth: – Multiple equilibria! Rather than converging to high
GDP, you get stuck in the bad equilibrium
![Page 41: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
A simple theory of nutrition and productivity:
• X-axis: w = calories (in simplest model, wages go only to food)
• Y-axis: e = work capacity (total number of tasks you are capable of completing in a day)
• e(w) = capacity curve (index of labor productivity)
Capacity curve relates income and work capacity
Higher income → better nutrition
![Page 42: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The Capacity Curve
ework
capacity
w (calories)
e(w)
![Page 43: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Key assumption:
• e(w) convex at low levels of wi, but then eventually concave
Interpretation:
• Better nutrition: Calories first used by body for basic metabolism, only after a certain level do they translate into higher capacity
• When capacity curve is steep (slope > 1), small decrease in wage lowers output by a lot
![Page 44: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
The Capacity Curve
ework
capacity
w (calories)
v1
v*
h(c)
Now add wages: v = slope is “piece rate”
![Page 45: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Involuntary unemployment:
• Because there is a discontinuity, employers can’t adjust wage to meet labor supply
Supply exceeds demand, so jobs are rationed
• Idea: Many want to work at this wage, but they can’t bid down the wage
Why not?
• Lower wage would decrease worker’s capacity to the point where it’s no longer worth it to hire him
![Page 46: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Implications for labor markets:
(1) Leads to involuntary unemployment: (people willing to work for lower wage but wages don’t adjust)
(2) Means that the poorest are more likely to be malnourished, and more likely to be unemployed because they are malnourished
– a poverty trap
Policy interventions can shift individuals’ capacity curve, so that involuntary labor is reduced for the neediest:
![Page 47: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Figure 4: Effect of Supplemental Nutrition on the Capacity Curve
Employment Income
![Page 48: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Caveat:
• Depends on extent to which capacity curve really S-shaped
• To find out, need to conduct an empirical study
![Page 49: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
A nutrition experiment (Thomas et al.):Indonesian Work and Iron Status Evaluation
• Thomas et al. studies iron deficiency in Indonesia
Hypothesis tested:
Iron deficiency →lower aerobic capacity, lower endurance, fatigue → lower labor productivity → lower earnings
Method: Randomized trial
![Page 50: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
What makes a good empirical study?
1. External validity:
• The validity of inferences about whether the cause-and-effect relationship holds in different settings
(How easily can we extrapolate?)
2. Internal validity:
• The validity of inferences about whether observed associations between program participation or a policy (X) and the target outcome (Y) reflects a causal relationship from the program/policy to the outcome
![Page 51: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Threats to external validity
• Characteristics of the population– Example: Nutritional needs of males may not hold for females
(calcium)
• Setting or context – Example: Impact of nutrition intervention depends on the
relative nutrient deficiencies, which depend on local diet
• Exact nature of the intervention– Example: Nutrient administered as supplement may not be
absorbed by body (but nutrient still important!)
• Outcome examined – Example: Maybe nutrient matters for cognitive ability but not
energy level
![Page 52: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Threats to internal validity:
• Reverse causation: Y caused X
• Omitted variables:
– Selection: People who participate in the program are systematically different
– History: Events occurring concurrently with treatment could cause the observed effect
• Mean reversion (before/after): Naturally occurring changes over time confused with a treatment effect
![Page 53: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Fundamental problem of impact assessment:
• Counterfactual outcome cannot be observed because individuals cannot simultaneously participant (T=1) and not participate in a program (T=0)
→ Same individual is only observed in one of two treatment states – received treatment (i.e, the policy or program) or not – so only see one set of outcomes (YA
T=1 or YAT=0)
![Page 54: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Problem:
Want to compare E[YAT=1] to E[YA
T=0],
… but forced to compare E[YAT=1] to E[YB
T=0]
Estimator: E[Net Effect of T] = E[YAT=1 – YB
T=0 ]
![Page 55: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
So how do we get unbiased estimate of effect of particular intervention?
Key: Develop believable counterfactual (Group B)
– Best estimate of outcome person would have had had they not participated in program or received treatment
![Page 56: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Empirical approaches to constructing counterfactual:
1. Select the best-looking comparison group ex-post
Example: Identify group that looks just like treated group but wasn’t treated
2. Construct an appropriate comparison group ex-ante
Best example: Randomized control trials (RCT):
• Treatment and control groups randomly selected from a potential population of participants
![Page 57: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Randomization guarantees necessary conditions for unbiased estimator:
If randomization valid, on average, two groups are identical in every way prior to being treated, so:
1. E[YBT=1] = E[YA
T=1]
(both groups have the same response to treatment),
and
2. E[YAT=0] = E[YB
T=0]
(both groups have same outcome if not treated)
![Page 58: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Experimental versus observational study:
Random treatment assignment addresses omitted variables (third factor):
You estimate:
Real model: (Z is omitted factor)
Purpose of randomization: Choose people to be treated so that treatment, X, not correlated with any other factor, Z, i.e.,
0 eZXY zx
0 vXZ x
0x
XY x ˆˆˆ0
)(ˆzXxx
![Page 59: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Major advantages of randomized designs
• If implemented correctly, they eliminate concerns about internal validity
• They are easy to explain and convincing to lay audience, including policy makers
![Page 60: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Calculating the experimental effect:
Before program
After program
Change
Experimental group YE1 YE
2 YE2-YE
1
Control group YC1 YC
2 YC2-YC
1
So what is the effect equal to?
[YE2-YE
1]-[YC2-YC
1]
Do we need two periods to get unbiased estimate?
![Page 61: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Disadvantages of randomized designs• Most experiments necessarily conducted in laboratory,
whereas policy experiments would be much better for external validity
• Field experiments costly (data collection, manipulation)
– Hard to keep well-controlled– Hard to collect large enough sample for EV
• All randomized experiments can be politically difficult (even laboratory experiments)
– No one wants the placebo!
• Some potential measurement problems:
![Page 62: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Potential problems with experiments:
• Confounding variables – Not a problem if randomize and large enough sample
• ContaminationSolution: Measure and check
• Attrition, complianceSolution: Intent-to-treat (what?)follow everyone regardless of what they do
• Placebo, Hawthorne, experimenter effects Solution: Make treatment blind, use placebo control group
• Generalizability Solution: Select random sample, stratify sample (requires increasingly large sample)
![Page 63: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Motivation for Thomas et al study• Iron deficiency thought to be most common bio-nutritional
deficiency in world
• In Indonesia, half of female and one-third of male adults iron deficient (likely due to diet, malaria, worms)
• Animal studies indicate causal relationship between iron deficiency and reduced maximum aerobic capacity (endurance = capacity curve)
• Strong correlation between income and iron deficiency
• What about existing studies?
Methods• Iron deficient households over-sampled. WHY?
![Page 64: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
![Page 65: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Why is a randomized intervention necessary?
• Strong correlation between hemoglobin levels and earnings
• What might this reflect?– Omitted variables?– Reverse causality?
![Page 66: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
![Page 67: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
![Page 68: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Measurement issues in Thomas experiment:• How did they deal with compliance?
– Pill packet monitoring (noisy): achieved 92% compliance– Showed up directly in blood levels (very good measure)– Same rate of compliance for treatment and control (Why imptnt?)
• Is attrition a problem? – Only 3% attrition at 6 months– Mainly due to mobility (not opting out)– Attrition same for treatment and control
• How did they reduce contamination?
• Randomized at household level:– reduce sharing– maintain blindness– (also increased compliance of illiterate participants)
![Page 69: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
![Page 70: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
![Page 71: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
![Page 72: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
![Page 73: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
![Page 74: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Estimator: Difference-in-difference-in-difference
What is this?
![Page 75: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Calculating the DIDID effect:
Before program
After program
Change
Experimental group
YE1 YE
2 YE2-YE
1
Control group YC1 YC
2 YC2-YC
1
[YE2-YE1]-[YC2-YC1]
So what is the effect equal to?
{[YE2-YE
1]-[YC2-YC
1]}-{[YE3-YE
4]-[YC3-YC
4]}
Why do they do this?
Before program
After program
Change
Experimental group
YE3 YE
4 YE4-YE
3
Control group
YC3 YC
4 YC4-YC
3
[YE4-YE3]-[YC4-YC3]
-
High Hb: Low Hb:
![Page 76: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
![Page 77: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Results: Among low-Hb treatments• Income 20% higher
• 3.6% more likely to be in labor force (only 5% OLF at baseline)
• Hours of work unaffected
What is interpretation of income increase?– Labor productivity
Is this likely in such a short time (wages are sticky …)?– Concentrated among the self-employed (50% of sample), so
plausible
Other possible reasons?
![Page 78: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Effects for self-employed?• Improvements mainly for self-employed
• 40% increase in hourly earnings (huge!)
• Work more or less ?– No real change
• Argument: this is short run
![Page 79: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Results (continued):• 0.8 fewer lost days of work
• 20 minutes less sleep
• More of treated group able to carry a heavy load
• No difference in reported fatigue! (maybe because they adjust sleep?)
• Some evidence of improved psycho-social health
• No measurable effect on women
Which of these results is most believable? Most surprising?What is most likely reason for gender difference?
![Page 80: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Lessons:
• How did they do on external validity? • Is there a lesson for economic theory?(Does it look like there’s an S-shaped capacity curve?)
• What about scientific theory?Lots of pathways, hard to clarify exactly happens inside bodyCan you think of a way to alter the experimental design that could
shed light on these?
• What are policy implications?Advantage: CHEAP intervention (increases policy relevance)Remaining issue: Opportunity cost of alternative interventions
To really inform policy, need similar results for many types of nutrients. Where would you start?
![Page 81: Econ 980o: Health, Education and Development Lecture 1 September 18, 2008](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813adf550346895da32bd2/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)