economic development advisory committee of... · mr. gudwin said for a project of $6 million or $8...

Economic Development Advisory Committee

May 8, 2019

1

Economic Development Advisory Committee

Market Station at the Railyard 500 Market Station, Suite 200

Wednesday, May 8, 2019

9:00 AM – 11:00 AM

I. PROCEDURES A. Roll Call B. Approval of Minutes

1. April 23, 2019 2. April 29, 2019

C. Approval of Agenda D. Approval of Consent Agenda

II. CONSENT AGENDA (None)

III. ACTION ITEMS A. Request for review and approval of a resolution approving the Design and

Installation Plan for banners along Guadalupe Street between Paseo de Peralta (South) and West Alameda – (Councilor Ives) (Elizabeth Camacho, Economic Development and Communications Administrator, [email protected], 955-6042).

B. Request for review and approval of an ordinance relating to the Land Development Code, Chapter 14 SFCC 1987; Amending Subsection 14-6.3 (D) (1) to permit accessory dwelling units to be built in compliance underlying design requirements, to permit the rental of both the principal dwelling unit and accessory dwelling unit except as a short term rental unit, voiding existing restrictive covenants set forth in Ordinance No. 2008-5; and making such other stylistic or grammatical changes as are necessary. (Councilors Ives, Vigil-Coppler, and Abeyta) (Carol Johnson, Land Use Department Director, [email protected], 955-6617).

A9e~da

SS002.pmd-11.W

mailto:[email protected]


2

IV. DISCUSSION A. Economic Development Policy & Initiative Brainstorming Session - Matt

Brown, Director of Economic Development, [email protected], 955-6915.

V. ITEMS FROM THE COMMITTEE

VI. ITEMS FROM STAFF

VII. ITEMS FROM THE CHAIR

VIII. ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC

IX. ITEMS NEXT MEETING DATE – June 26, 2019

Persons with disabilities in need of accommodation, contact the City Clerk’s office at 955-6520, five (5) working days prior to meeting date.

RECEIVED AT THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE DATE:_May 1, 2019________ TIME:_11:41 AM__________


Minutes

SUMMARY OF ACTION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE

MARKET STATION AT THE RAIL YARD 500 MARKET STATION, SUITE 200

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 2019, 11:00 AM

ITEM ACTION

PROCEDURES

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL NO QUORUM

APPROVAL OF MINUTES NO ACTION

APPROVAL OF AGENDA NO ACTION

APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA NONE

CONSENT AGENDA NONE

AC! IO.NJJEMS

REQUEST FOR REVIEW AN APPROVAL NO ACTION OF THREE (3) CONTRACT AMENDMENTS OF THE FY-2018-2019 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PORTFOLIO AS AWARDED THROUGH RFP TO PROVIDE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, AND OTHER SUPPORT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN SANTA FE FOR A TOTAL FUNDING AMOUNT OF $75,000 AS IDENTIFIED.

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

PAGE

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

REVIEW DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FEEDBACK

INFORMATION/DISCUSSION 2-9

ITEMS FROM THE COMMITTEE

ITEMS FROM STAFF

ITEMS FROM THE CHAIR

ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC

NEXT MEETING DATE

ADJOURN

NONE 9

NONE 9

INFORMATION/DISCUSSION 9

NONE 9

MAY 8, 2019 9

ADJOURNED 9-10

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARKET STATION AT THE RAIL YARD

500 MARKET STATION, SUITE 200 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 2019, 11:00 AM

I. PROCEDURES

A. CALL TO ORDER

The meeting of the Economic Development Advisory Committee was called to order by Councilor Roman Abeyta, Chair, at 11 :05 am on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at Market Station at the Railyard, 500 Market Station, Suite 200, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

8. MEMBERS PRESENT Councilor Roman Abeyta, Chair Holly Bradshaw-Eakes John Fiens Robert Lurcott Sean O'Shea (2 vacancies)

There was not a quorum present.

MEMBERS ABSENT Helen Brooks, Excused Dr. Camilla Bustamante, Excused Kate Kennedy Tamara Duran, Resigned

OTHERS PRESENT Matt Brown, Economic Development Department (Mr. Brown) Rich Brown, Economic Development Department (Mr. R. Brown) Fabian Trujillo, Economic Development, City of Santa Fe Liz Camancho Phillip Gudwin Marie Longserre, Santa Fe Business Incubator Jodie Larson, League of Women Voters

Economic Development Advisory Committee April 10, 2019 Page 1

C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MARCH 13, 2019

Unable to approve due to lack of a quorum.

D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

Unable to approve due to lack of a quorum.

E. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA

None.

II. CONSENT AGENDA

None.

Ill. ACTION ITEMS

A. REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THREE (3) CONTRACT AMENDMENTS OF THE FY-2018-2019 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PORTFOLIO AS AWARDED THROUGH RFP TO PROVIDE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, AND OTHER SUPPORT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN SANTA FE FOR A TOTAL FUNDING AMOUNT OF $75,000 AS IDENTIFIED. Matt Brown

1. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT NO. 3 - SANTA FE BUSINESS INCUBATOR RFP 16/38/P;

2. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT NO. 3 - YOUTHWORKS RFP 16/37/P;

3. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT NO. 4 - SCORE RFP 15/38/P

Unable to address due to lack of a quorum.

IV. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

A. REVIEW DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FEEDBACK Matt Brown


Mr. Brown said we received comments from the last meeting and written comments from others ineluding Sean ahd are starting to make amendments to this. The additions are not in this packet yet. We will be sharing our draft with 30 to 50 people in the community for feedback as well. By the next meeting we will have the final draft.

Mt. Brown eontinued the Plan presentation from the last meeting beginning with slide 39. Robert asked at the last meeting about the ranking of priorities. Our prioritization list is in your packets.

Mr. Brown continued his presentation.

Mr. Fiens asked how does this break down in terms of acceleration and incubation.

Mr. Brown said that is part of the work to define that. They are part of the ecosystem including established companies. They can provide marketing, capacity for production and other things. It would be a holistic approach.

Mr. Fiens asked should there not be university or college partners.

Mr. Brown said yes absolutely. NMSU particularly. We are already in talks with them.

Mr. Fiens said one of the typical topics here is brain drain. Losing young people. He is wondering how can we give young entrepreneurs a boost to start their companies here in the State.

Mr. Brown said this would help that to happen. We would have a more integrated and powerful ecosystem for starting and running companies. That is the big dream.

Mr. O'Shea asked did the food idea come from Kauffman or from Santa Fe.

Mr. Brown said from Los Alamos, Albuquerque, Espanola and Santa Fe.

Mr. O'Shea asked if you are looking at a needs assessment for kinds of tech do you think Descartes Labs needs the same thing as a pecan farmer.

Mr. Brown said no.

Mr. O'Shea asked so why are they lumped together.

Mr. Brown said we were thinking about Descartes Labs as a representative company in the agriculture category.

Economic Development Advisory Committee April 10; 2019 Page 3

Mr. O'Shea said if there are limited resources and scarcity of resources should they be the same kind of company.

Mr. Brown said he did not think so. It depends on what we ultimately do with this project. Our thinking is that a cluster has a variety of participants in it. It is not a series of different nut tree farmers we are trying to build a cluster around. It is more about the whole pipeline in the food sector to the final product on the shelf.

The presentation continued.

Mr. Fiens asked has the handoff of Mix to the Chamber been resolved.

Mr. Brown said yes.

Mr. R. Brown continued the presentation.

Ms. Bradshaw Eakes asked are most opportunity zones around the county targeting large companies.

Mr. R. Brown said they are looking for other things as well. We are the only City in the State right now that have a signal out there. We are competing on a national level to attract funds. He is trying to ensure local realtors know how to make that deal happen. There could be multiple funds that invest in a piece of property.

Mr. Brown said we will send all of you the link to the opportunity zone page we have made so you are aware of where they are in the City. If you hear of any opportunity turn them to us so we can work with them.

Mr. Gudwin said in the opportunity zones there is a criteria of 30 months once the deal is made to finish it. When Mr. Brown talks about changing some zoning, such as the Midtown link concept to do overlays, we don't have a year or two to think about that. It has to happen quickly to draw people in. There are very specific time lines. If the City does not have the overlay on opportunity zones we may lose an opportunity.

Mr. R. Brown said we have overlays now.

Mr. Gudwin said for a project of $6 million or $8 million it would be a $400,000 savings. That is a big incentive.

Mr. R. Brown said we have basic overlay on Cerrillos and Airport. We want to narrow them down so we can say in census track 1103 let's do enough incentive for 10 years for the life of the program. One of the things happening is that development and commercial realtors would like to change some of the zoning tracks. For instance there are opportunities for a grocery store with apartments on top, but they want to sell alcohol and it is too close to a school. We have to work through some of those to fit into the


community need.

Mr. Fiens said they could sell alcohol after school hours.

Mr. Brown said we could do that. Smiths bought the land for that purpose and is now trying to sell it. Internal stakeholders are getting input all day long and they share with us. We look at community need such as food, housing and workforce development on top of housing. Does it fit into the needs that are happening. The other one is the Rufina corridor. It is starting to be an entertainment corridor. It is zoned R 1. Could we change that to C 2 to allow grocery stores and housing. We are working on it.

Mr. O'Shea asked is there any word about money in these funds being used for non real estate deals.

Mr. R. Brown said no, not really. Some funds are being formed to invest in start ups. You can invest in a business as a partnership or stock. A couple of investors here are waiting for that. Developers in California are looking here for incubation or acceleration going on. Mostly it is housing and real estate.

Mr. Gudwin said the big push nationally is real estate. It is the easiest. There is an opportunity for the food tech scenario if you can get something running quickly. They launched it and have not written the rules yet. It is a fluid situation that is typical.

Mr. R. Brown said it is rumored the end date may extend a couple of years because the Feds have no rules.

Mr. Gudwin said big companies are in touch with the Feds looking to push that 30 month timeline out. Right now you have to almost be shovel ready now to meet that.

Mr. Brown said we are trying to get portions of Midtown shovel ready.

Mr. O'Shea asked how are you defining tech.

Mr. R. Brown said that is why we want to have a meeting. There are a wide variety of tech uses in companies here. We need to discuss that at the meeting. We are bringing in some leaders from tech businesses and thought leaders who can tell us about their experiences and what we should be focused on.

Mr. O'Shea asked what was the criteria for choosing invitees.

Mr. R. Brown said we had a committee of eight people from tech companies who helped us with that. We focused on tech companies and then looked in the ecosystems at leaders who have direct connections with tech companies. You are an example. You work in a tech business and are an economic development consultant. We have all of


our State partners from each Department to the finance group to regional representatives and the Community College. We came up with 200 people and narrowed it down to 120 invitees. Marie is invited.

Mr. O'Shea asked is bio tech included in this

Mr. R. Brown said yes Pebble Labs is invited as is the President of the New Mexico Tech Council and the CEO of technology transfer at UNM. People in all parts of the sphere on top of the tech industry in a broad range. The Mayor will be there.

The presentation continued.

Mr. Brown said we tried statewide business licensing at the legislature, but did not get there this year.

Mr. Fiens said this is an example of something that is a deterrent to expanding or new businesses. The constant refrain of not getting responses from various City Departments. That is a piece of the struggle.

Mr. Brown said in this work in addition to separating we mapped out work flows on the Land Use and Fire side. It requires our coordination with them and changing priorities, Resolutions and Ordinances. We have worked on that as well. We will get there.

Mr. Trujillo said except for a few instances you can get a fire inspection within 72 hours. They can get out to almost all of the businesses within that time. There are a few times where there are issues where they cannot get out there. Usually it has to do with coordination with businesses. The business has to be set up. The business inspection process usually happens pretty quickly. They have had some retirements in that area so things have been delayed quite a bit due to that. Now it is resolving itself. We have been able to take care of some of the obstacles within a few days with a call to the Land Use Director. They are getting on track. We would have to see on a case by case basis what the cause of the delay is.

Mr. Fiens said he just wants to make sure the human piece is there with the software.

Mr. Brown said we are trying to get as big a tent as possible.

Mr. O'Brien asked is there a way to pre-certify a building in total.

Mr. Brown said we are trying to get an answer on that.

Mr. O'Brien said when he started his business at the Incubator a guy still had to come out there and waste his time. They go to the Incubator all the time.


Mr. Brown said that is in our workflow to correct. It is a great point. We don't have an answer yet. It is a waste of time on both sides.

Ms. Camancho continued the presentation.

Mr. Fiens asked does the website have a push component to it.

Ms. Camancho said the first item is the pull and organization and to ensure ease and make it informative to people. The pushing out is one of the things the Director of Constituent Services has on her agenda. The social media aspect. That is step 2.

Mr. Fiens said it is long term, but if you guys put together at least a quarterly newsletter that would be good. Even if it is one page. So much the better. With hyperlinks to pull people to the site. People would sign up for that newsletter. Over time it will pay dividends.

Ms. Camancho said the Mayor is really good about that. He has Friday videos he puts on. He is on top of acknowledging successes. It is part of changing the idea that government is not business friendly or not functional. Seasonal reports are part of that. It is about informing people.

Mr. Fiens said take a look at the Santa Fe Community Newsletter platform. It is a great example.

Mr. Trujillo continued the presentation regarding the Navigator Program.

Mr. Brown said he thinks it is beneficial to us if we get a lot of real time on the ground information consistently of what is going on. It will help us make better strategic choices and decisions. What is happening where. Where are we weak and where are we strong. So we can be a more responsive partner. He likes that aspect of it as well.

Mr. Brown continued the presentation.

Mr. Lurcott said he is curious to get a sense of how the Railyard is doing.

Mr. Brown said REI is pretty happy. This is one of their most successful stores on a square foot basis. He would characterize it as a range of successes. It was taken from dirt to this. It is an achievement and benefit to the City. We have an agreement with the leadership of the Railyard. The property itself is absent some kind of night time or programming like the Farmers Market so there is not much activity or vibrancy. That is part of the visioning. A new gathering place. A locals plaza. Everyone is sensing that there is something in the next stage to be done. We are trying to facilitate that and have conversations about it. On the City side there are some very severe safety issues in the park. Needles, drugs and people accosted. That startled us. The Mayor said we have to get our heads into this and what it is about. We have to have a safe, clean, vibrant


place for the community to be.

Mr. Fiens asked how is the parking. There is a lack of awareness of the underground parking facility.

Mr. Brown said it is possible that parking will always be an issue forever. The garage itself is under capacity 310 days a year. The pricing is such that the meters are more expensive than the garage Even with that there are still 40 days that are tough. The way finding is not the best. They are putting together some funds to address that. Regina and Noel are working on that. There is a broader conversation going on.

Mr. Brown continued the presentation.

Mr. Trujillo reported that the JTIP got an additional $10 million from the Legislature, LEDA got an additional $60 million and another $15 million if the budget revenue goes over $7.4 billion. The high wage tax credit was signed and passed to create easier access to that tax credit.

Mr. Brown said the Legislature passed a bill to pay off the backlog on incentives and raised the cap to $110 million.

Mr. Fiens said with the unpredictably of LEDA it sounds like the wild west at the moment. Do you foresee coming up short in a robust year.

Mr. Brown said not currently, but potentially in the future. There is money from Tierra Contenta that is allocated to affordable housing and economic development. There are some funds accumulated there. If a surprise happens we have money to take care of that. He talked with Finance about how much of a buffer amount we need to leave in the fund. He would like to draw that money down, but establish a buffer. We are working on that.

Mr. Trujillo said one of the things that impacts us with LEDA is a tight real estate market. The unavailability of bigger buildings and inventory of small community buildings are not what they used to be. There is a lot of availability for build to suit projects.

Mr. Gudwin said as we came out of 2008 we wound with a lot of vacant buildings. As things picked up a lot have been occupied. One of the problems is there is not a lot of money for specific building in commercial or housing. Banks look at that not in a positive way. Maybe there are one or two larger buildings left.

Mr. Brown said if we can't find something in the City we find it in the County. Rather than them moving to Albuquerque. We think City first, County second.

Mr. Gudwin said it would be good to make commercial realtors aware of some of the needs.


Mr. Fiens asked does this come up in recruiting conversations.

Mr. Brown said it does.

V. ITEMS FROM THE COMMITTEE

None.

VI. ITEMS FROM STAFF

None.

VII. ITEMS FROM THE CHAIR

There was discussion about holding a Special Meeting to address the action item on this agenda.

It was decided that there will be a Special Meeting of the Economic Development Advisory Committee on April 23rd at 9:00 am.

Mr. Trujillo said he will inform the other members of the committee.

Mr. Trujillo announced that Ms. Duran resigned leaving us with two vacancies.

Chair Abeyta asked do we have anyone else on the list for additional appointments.

Mr. Brown said Kathy Keith or Buddy Roybal.

VIII . ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC

None.

IX. NEXT MEETING DATE MAY 8, 2019

X. ADJOURN

There being no further business before the Committee the meeting adjourned at 12:30 pm.


Councilor Roman Abeyta, Chair

-d:/2------------Elizabetn Martin, Stenographer


Action Items

Item A

City of Santa Fe, New Mexico LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY

Resolution No. 2019-Banners on Guadalupe Street

SPONSOR(S): Councilor Ives

SUMMARY: The proposed Resolution authorizes the display of banners along Guadalupe Street between Paseo de Peralta (South) and West Alameda. The Resolution specifies the dates, location, number, design approval process, installation, maintenance, and cost allocation.

PREPARED BY: Jesse Guillen, Legislative Liaison

FISCAL IMP ACT: No

DATE: March 14, 2019

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution FIR Additional Documents

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO

RESOLUTION NO. 2019-_

INTRODUCED BY:

Councilor Peter N. Ives

10 A RESOLUTION

11 APPROVING THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION PLAN FOR BANNERS ALONG

12 GUADALUPE STREET BETWEEN PASEO DE PERALTA (SOUTH) AND WEST

13 ALAMEDA.

14

15 WHEREAS, Santa Fe City Code Section 14-8 .10 allows for the installation of banners

16 erected by the City of Santa Fe ("City") or its designee if approved by the Governing Body via

1 7 Resolution; and

18 WHEREAS, the Resolution regarding installation of banners must specify dates of

19 display, location, number, design approval process, installation, maintenance, and cost allocation;

20 and

21 WHEREAS, merchants along Guadalupe Street seek ways to increase visibility and to

22 attract people to the area; and

23 WHEREAS, the City recently implemented a pilot project to permit free parking in the

24 area beginning at 5:00 pm; and

25 WHEREAS, merchants along Guadalupe Street seek to create a unique identity and

10053.4

1 differentiate themselves; and

2 WHEREAS, they have chosen a graphic representation of the Guadalupe Statue on

3 Guadalupe Street as an iconic symbol to unify and identify them.

4 WHEREAS, the merchants have requested the installation of banners using existing

5 hardware to promote the area as a destination for people seeking out local shops and restaurants;

6 and

7 WHEREAS, support structures are already in place along Guadalupe Street that were

8 installed for the City's display of banners in celebration of the City's 400th year anniversary.

9 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE

10 CITY OF SANT A FE that the design and installation plan for banners along Guadalupe Street

11 provided below, is hereby approved:

12 Dates:

13

14 Location:

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Number:

Design Approval Process:

Installation:

10053.4

The banners may be displayed from (July 1, 2019) to

(June 30, 2020).

The banners may be displayed on existing sign support

structures along Guadalupe Street between Paseo de

Peralta (South) and West Alameda.

Twenty-two (22) total banners may be displayed

(Exhibit A).

The design of the banners has been approved by the

Historic Design Review Board as conforming to existing

City Code regarding signs in Historic Districts pursuant

to 14-8.l0(H)(l 1) SFCC 1987.

The merchants participating in the banner program shall

utilize qualified vendors to install the banners subject to

approvals by the Public Works Department as specified

2

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Maintenance:

Cost Allocation:

in the following section.


be responsible for maintenance of the banners. The City

reserves the right to order the paiiicipating merchants to

remove any banners the City deem in disrepair prior to

their scheduled removal date.


be responsible for all costs associated with the banner

program including production of the banners,

installation, maintenance, and removal.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as a condition of approval, the merchants along

Guadalupe Street who are participating in the banner program provide the following to the City:

I.

2.

3.

Approval from the Public Works Department to install on the light poles;

Permit for Obstruction of Streets issued by the Public Works Department;

A surety to the City in a form acceptable to the City Attorney in the event that the

banners are not removed; and

4. Certificates of Insurance evidencing the insurance required. Participating

merchants, and all vendors and/or their contractors hired to install, maintain, or repair the

banners, shall maintain the following insurance policies:

a. Commercial General Liability for bodily injury and property damage

with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate.

The policy shall be endorsed to name City of Santa Fe, its officials, employees, and

agents as additional insured .

b. Workers ' Compensation insurance as required by the State of New

Mexico and Employer's Liability with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident or

10053.4 3

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

disease. The Workers' Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of

subrogation in favor of the City of Santa Fe, its officials, employees, and agents.

5. A release and assumption of liability from the vendor in a form acceptable to the

City Attorney.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ____ ., 2019.

9 ALAN M. WEBBER, MAYOR

10 ATTEST:

11

12

13 YOLANDA Y. VIGIL, CITY CLERK

14 APPROVED AS TO FORM:

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 M!Legis!ation/Reso!utions 20 I 9/Banners on Guadalupe Street

10053.4 4

City of Santa Fe Fiscal Impact Report (FIR)

FIR No. 3157

This Fiscal Impact Report (FIR) shall be completed for each proposed bill or resolution as to its direct impact upon the City 's operating budget and is intended for use by any of the standing committees of and the Governing Body of the City of Santa Fe. Bills or resolutions with no fiscal impact still require a completed FIR. Bills or resolutions with a fi scal impact must be reviewed by the Finance Committee. Bills or resolutions without a fiscal impact generally do not require review by the Finance Committee unless the subject of the bill or resolution is financial in nature.

Section A. General Information

(Check) Bill:_____ Resolution: ____ _ (A single FIR may be used for related bills and/or resolutions) Short Title(s): A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION PLAN FOR BANNERS ALONG GUADALUPE STREET BETWEEN PASEO DE PERALTA (SOUTH) AND WEST ALAMEDA.

Sponsor(s): Councilor Ives

Reviewing Department(s): =E'°"c""'o-'-'n"'-01'-'-n'-"ic"'--"'D'-"e'-'-v""'"e'""lo"'p"'m'-'-'e'-'-n,_,_t _______________________ _

Persons Completing FIR: Phone: 955-6042

Section B. Summary Briefly explain the purpose and major provisions of the bill/resolution: This Resolution permits the installation of banners along Guadalupe Street between Paseo de Peralta and West Alameda. The Resolution specifies the dates, location, number, design approval process, installation, maintenance, and cost allocation related to the banners . .It also specifies the required insurance, approvals, permits, surety, and release of liability.

Section C. Fiscal Impact Note: Financial information on this FIR does not directly translate into a City of Santa Fe budget increase. For a budget increase, the following are required: a. The item must be on the agenda at the Finance Committee and City Council as a "Request for Approval of a City

of Santa Fe Budget Increase" with a definitive funding source (could be same item and same time as bill/resolution)

b. Detailed budget information must be attached as to fund , business units, and line item, amounts, and explanations (similar to annual requests for budget)

c. Detailed personnel forms must be attached as to range, salary, and benefit allocation and signed by Human Resource Department for each new position(s) requested (prorated for period to be employed by fiscal year)*

1. Projected Expenditures: a. Indicate Fiscal Year(s) affected - usually current fiscal year and following fiscal year (i .e., FY 03/04 and FY 04/05) b. Indicate:

c. Indicate:

"A" if current budget and level of staffing will absorb the costs "N" if new, additional , or increased budget or staffing will be required "R" - if recurring annual costs "NR" if one-time, non-recurring costs, such as start-up, contract or equipment costs

d. Attach additional projection schedules if two years does not adequately project revenue and cost patterns

Finance Director: ___ _

Column#·

Column#·

e. Costs may be netted or shown as an offset if some cost savings are projected (explain in Section 3 Narrative)

------'X'-"--- Check here if no fiscal impact

Expenditure Classification

Personnel*

Fringe**

Capital Outlay

Land/ Building

Professional Services

All Other Operating Costs

Total:

FY

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

2 3 4 "A" Costs "R" Costs ---

Absorbed Recurring or"N" or"NR" New Non-Budget recurring Required

5 6 7 8 FY "A" Costs "R" Costs - Fund ---

Absorbed Recurring Affected or"N" New or"NR" Budget Non-Required recurring

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

* Any indication that additional staffing would be required must be reviewed and approved in advance by the City Manager by attached memo before release of FIR to committees. ** For fringe benefits contact the Finance Dept.

2. Revenue Sources: a. To indicate new revenues and/or b. Required for costs for which new expenditure budget is proposed above in item 1.

2 3 4 5 6 Type of FY --- "R" Costs FY --- "R" Costs - Fund Revenue Recurring Recurring or Affected

or"NR" "NR" Non-Non- recurring recurring

$ $

$ $

$ $

Total: $ $

2 Form adopted: 01 / 12/05; revised 8/24/05; revised 4/ 17/08

3. Expenditure/Revenue Narrative:

Explain revenue source(s) . Include revenue calculations, grant(s) available, anticipated date of receipt of revenues/grants, etc. Explain expenditures, grant match(s), justify personnel increase(s), detail capital and operating uses, etc. (Attach supplemental page, if necessary.)

NIA. The City is not taking on any of the expenses associated with the installation or maintenance of the banners.

Section D. General Narrative

I. Conflicts: Does this proposed bill /resolution duplicate/conflict with/companion to/relate to any City code, approved ordinance or resolution, other adopted policies or proposed legislation? Include details of city adopted laws/ordinance/resolutions and dates. Summarize the relationships, conflicts or overlaps.

Current City Code does not permit the display of banners, but a proposed Bill changes that Section of Code to allow the display of banners.

2. Consequences of Not Enacting This Bill/Resolution:

Are there consequences of not enacting this bill/resolution? If so, describe.

The City will not authorize the display of banners along Guadalupe Street.

3. Technical Issues:

Are there incon-ect citations of law, drafting en-ors or other problems? Are there any amendments that should be considered? Are there any other alternatives which should be considered? If so, describe.

None identified.

4. Community Impact:

Briefly describe the major positive or negative effects the Bill/Resolution might have on the community including, but not limited to, businesses, neighborhoods, families, children and youth, social service providers and other institutions such as schools, churches, etc .

Merchants along Guadalupe Street have requested the ability to display banners on existing sign support structures to promote the area as a destination for people seeking out local shops and restaurants. The proposed banners comply with design requirements for the Historic District.

3 Form adopted: 01 /12/05; revised 8/24/05 ; revised 4/17 /08

guaaa1ups srreer mapLJpeg Imps: 1.-ma1 l.google.com·m ail. u., 0/?pli= 1 =search/scott:g'sco

Alco Sr

Don Fehx St

De Vargas Pi

!11 . '

l,y Manhattan Ave

Item B

City of Santa Fe, New Mexico LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY

Bill No. 2019-7 Accessory Dwelling Units

SPONSOR(S): Councilors Ives, Vigil Coppler, and Abeyta

SUMMARY: The proposed bill amends Subsection 14-6.3(D)(l) regarding accessory dwelling units to ease restrictions on parking, height, size, and use as well as voiding existing restrictive covenants put in place by a previous Ordinance.

PREPARED BY: Jesse Guillen, Legislative Liaison

FISCAL IMP ACT: No

DATE: February 15, 2019; updated April 30, 2019

ATTACHMENTS: Ives Amendment Bill FIR (Amended)

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S) TO BILL NO. 2019-7

Accessory Dwelling Units

Mayor and Members of the City Council:

I propose the following amendment(s) to Bill No. 2019-7:

1. On page 2, delete lines 6-8 and insert the following in lieu thereof: "(i) Any legal on-street parking space abutting the subject property may be counted as one required off-street parking space if:

A. the street does not have residential parking permit restrictions; 8. the street measures a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet in width

from face of curb to face of curb; and C. there are no posted restrictions prohibiting on-street parking."

2. On page 2, line 19 delete "shall be" and insert " is" in lieu thereof

Respectfu I ly submitted,

Peter N. Ives, Councilor

ADOPTED: ________ _ NOT ADOPTED: -------DATE:

Yolanda Y. Vigil, City Clerk

2

3

4

5

6

7

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO

BILL NO. 2019-7

INTRODUCED BY:

Councilor Peter N. Ives

Councilor JoAnne Vigil Coppler

Councilor Roman "Tiger" Abeyta

* 8 a) -0

II 9

;$ <l) t:: II

«l ·;::

~ E

-0 <l) ,_ 0 (.) Vl ,_ <l)

-0 c::: ::::

10 AN ORDINANCE

11 RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 14 SFCC 1987;

12 AMENDING SUBSECTION 14-6.3(D)(l) TO PERMIT ON-STREET PARKING TO

13 MEET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, TO

14 IMPOSE LIMITS ON THE HEIGHT AND SETBACK FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING

15 UNITS, TO PERMIT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS TO BE BUILT IN

16 COMPLIANCE WITH UNDERLYING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, TO PERMIT THE

17 RENTAL OF BOTH THE PRINCIPAL DWELLING UNIT AND ACCESSORY

18 DWELLING UNIT EXCEPT AS A SHORT TERM RENTAL UNIT, VOIDING

19 EXISTING RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS SET FORTH IN ORDINANCE 2008-5; AND

20 MAKING SUCH OTHER STYLISTIC OR GRAMMATICAL CHANGES AS ARE

21 NECESSARY.

22

23 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SANTA FE:

24 Section 1. Subsection 14-6.3(D)(l) SFCC 1987 (being Ord. No. 2011-37, § 8 (as

25 amended)) is amended to read:

10056.3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

(D) Standards for Specific Accessory Uses

(I) Accessory Dwelling Units

Accessory dwelling units located on residentially zoned property:

(a) are required to meet parking standards as set forth in Section 14-8.6

except that the parking requirement may be met with on-street parking as follows:

(i) Any on-street parking space abutting the subject property may

be counted as one required off-street parking space if the street does not have

residential parking permit restrictions:

(ii) Each on-street parking space may only be counted once toward

the parking requirements of the abutting lot, regardless of the number of

individual buildings or tenants on the lot;

(iii) No development or use approved with an on-street parking credit

shall be considered nonconforming if the on-street parking is later removed by

city action and the remaining off-street parking does not meet the minimum off

street parking requirements of this Section l 4-6.3(D)(l ): and

(iv) On-street parking spaces credited to a specific property shall not

be reserved for the exclusive use by occupants of that property, but shall be

available for general public use at all times. No signage or actions limiting

general public use of on-street spaces shall be allowed.

(b) shall be regulated as per city regulations and policies

regarding city utilities;

( c) are exempt from the density restrictions set forth in this Chapter 14;

provided, however, that only one accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted per legal lot

of record and provided further that nothing herein is intended to supersede private

covenants or other restrictions;

10056.3 2

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

[(d) shall be bttilt only •n·hen permission to eonstrnet is granted to the owner

occupant of tlie principal cA, clling unit;]

([ e Jg_) shall [have lot eoverage not e,teeeding the sqttare footage of

the lot eoverage] not exceed either the gross floor area of the principal dwelling unit or

[Rot more than] one thousand five hundred square feet, whichever is less;

([fj~) [shall be limited to one story and shall net e,rneeEI fot111een (14) feet to

the top of the parapet or to tlie highest point of tlie reef if there is RO parapet;] shall not

exceed the limits established by the building envelope of the principal structure if created

within or attached to the principal structure, or the height or setbacks for accessory

structures as set forth in Table 14-7.2-1:

([g]f) shall [be of the same arehiteetttral style as tlrn principal dwelling unit]

meet existing design requirements applicable to the lot, including any requirements of

Section 14-5 (overlay zoning districts), including all Historic Districts requirements, if

applicable;

10056.3

([h]g) may be rented as follows:

(i) by the owner-occupant, who may rent

the principal dwelling unit or the accessory dwelling unit as a short-term rental

unit but not both, as a short term rental unit pursuant to Section 14-6.2(A)(5),

during which time[,] the owner-occupant shall occupy either

the principal dwelling unit or [ ooe-ef] the accessory dwelling unit[ s]; or

(ii) by the property owner. [ occt.pat1t] who may rent [either]

the principal dwelling unit and/or the accessory dwelling unit for periods of not

less than thirty days;f-Br

(iii) by tl'le preperty owner who ma)' reRt betl'l the principal d,1 clling

1,mit and the accessory dwelling 1,1,1it to the same lessee, however, RO separate

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

subletting of eitlier zmit is allov,1ed.]

(i) [shall not be issued a construction permit until a restrictive covenant is

recorded at tlrn office of the county clerk that requires the current preperty OHJ1Cr and all

foture preperty 0~1 ne1'S to comply with Subsection 1 4 6.3(0)( l ). Tlie covenant shall be in

a form approved by the l-ttnd use director and tlie city attorney and shall be notarized

prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded covenants sliall be provided to the l-ttnd use

di,·ector with tlie construction permit application . Tlie l:a11d me directo,· shall maintain

copies of recorded covenants pursuant to the provisions of this section. An affidavit filed

prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 2008 5 (ordaining Section I 4 6.2(A)(5)) and

amending Subsection 14 6.J(D)(l) remains in effect and is automatically amended to

reflect the provisions of Ordinance "J)-Jo. 2008 5.] The adoption of Ordinance 2019-

supersedes the previous requirement set forth in Ordinance 2008-5 that a property owner

seeking a construction permit for an accessory dwelling unit must first record a restrictive

covenant, in a form approved by the land use director and the city attorney, requiring

compliance with Subsection 14-6.3(0)0). Restrictive covenants that have been recorded

pursuant to the requirements of Ordinance 2008-5 are rendered void by the adoption of

Ordinance 2019-

([j]h) shall not be subdivided from a principal dwelling unit or sold under

separate ownership from a principal dwelling unit unless the accessory dwelling

unit meets all applicable requirements for a principal dwelling unit[. In sucli case, the

restrictions set forth in Subsection I 4 6.3 (D)(J) shall no longer apply and the affidavit or

restrictive covenant in Subsection 14 6.J(D)(l) may be voided upon approval of tlie l-ttnd

me mrccter] ; and

((k]i) shall remain in continuous compliance with the provisions of this section

to maintain the validity of the certificate of occupancy of the accessory dwelling unit.

10056.3 4

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

The certificate of occupancy of an accessory dwelling unit may be revoked for

noncompliance with this Subsection I 4-6.3(0)( 1) as provided in A1iicle I 4-

1 I Enforcement.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

M/Legislation/Bi/1s 2019/Accessory Dwelling Units

10056.3 5

AMENDED

City of Santa Fe Fiscal Impact Report (FIR)

FIR No. 3152

This Fiscal Impact Report (FIR) shall be completed for each proposed bill or resolution as to its direct impact upon the City ' s operating budget and is intended for use by any of the standing committees of and the Governing Body of the City of Santa Fe. Bills or resolutions with no fiscal impact still require a completed FIR. Bills or resolutions with a fiscal impact must be reviewed by the Finance Committee. Bills or resolutions without a fiscal impact generally do not require review by the Finance Committee unless the subject of the bill or resolution is financial in nature.

Section A. General Information

(Check) Bill : X Resolution : ____ _ (A single FIR may be used for related bills and/or resolutions) Short Title(s) : AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 14 SFCC 1987; AMENDING SUBSECTION 14-6.3(D)(l) TO PERMIT ON-STREET PARKING TO MEET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLlNG UNITS, TO IMPOSE LIMITS ON THE HEIGHT AND SETBACK FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, TO PERMIT ACCESSORY DWELILNG UNITS TO BE BUILT IN COMPLIANCE WITH UNDERLYING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, TO PERMIT THE RENTAL OF BOTH THE PRIMARY DWELLING UNIT AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT EXCEPT AS A SHORT TERM RENT AL UNITS; AND MAKING SUCH OTHER STYLISTIC OR GRAMMATICAL CHANGES AS ARE NECESSARY.

Sponsor(s): Councilors Ives, Vigil Coppler Abeyta, and Lindell

Reviewing Department(s): "'L"'-a'-!:nd"'---"'U'--"s~e.1=D"-'e'-"p'.>!a,_,1t"-'-m...,,e"'n-'--t ______________________ _

Phone: 955-6617

Reviewed by Finance Director: _________________ Date: __________ _ (Signature)

Section B. Summary Briefly explain the purpose and major provisions of the bill /resolution: The purpose of this bill is to amend restrictions on the available uses of accessory dwelling units (ADUs); to relax restrictions on height, setbacks, and gross floor area; to allow on-street parking to satisfy parking requirements; and to permit both the primary dwelling unit and the ADU to be rental units (but not short term rentals).

Section C. Fiscal Impact Note: Financial information on this FIR does not directly translate into a City of Santa Fe budget increase. For a budget increase, the following are required: a. The item must be on the agenda at the Finance Committee and City Council as a "Request for Approval of a City

of Santa Fe Budget Increase" with a definitive funding source ( could be same item and same time as bill/resolution)

b. Detailed budget information must be attached as to fund , business units, and line item, amounts, and explanations (similar to annual requests for budget)

c. Detailed personnel forms must be attached as to range, salary, and benefit allocation and signed by Human Resource Department for each new position(s) requested (prorated for period to be employed by fiscal year)*

I. Projected Expenditures: a. Indicate Fiscal Year(s) affected - usually current fiscal year and following fiscal year (i.e. , FY 03/04 and FY 04/05)

Finance Director: ___ _

Column #:

Column #:

b. Indicate: "A" if current budget and level of staffing will absorb the costs "N" if new, additional, or increased budget or staffing will be required

c. Indicate: " R" - if recurring annual costs "NR" if one-time, non-recurring costs, such as start-up, contract or equipment costs

d. Attach additional projection schedules if two years does not adequately project revenue and cost patterns e. Costs may be netted or shown as an offset if some cost savings are projected (explain in Section 3 Narrative)

--~Xc..e.,_ __ Check here ifno fiscal impact

Expenditure Classification

Personnel*

Fringe**

Capital Outlay

Land/ Building

Professional Services

All Other Operating Costs

Total:

2 FY ---

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

3 4 "A" Costs " R" Costs Absorbed Recurring or "N" or "NR" New Non-Budget recurring Required

5 6 7 8 FY "A" Costs "R" Costs - Fund ---

Absorbed Recurring Affected or "N" New or "NR" Budget Non-Required recurring

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

* Any indication that additional staffing would be required must be reviewed and approved in advance by the City Manager by attached memo before release of FIR to committees. **For fringe benefits contact the Finance Dept.

2. Revenue Sources: a. To indicate new revenues and/or b. Required for costs for which new expenditure budget is proposed above in item I .

2 3 4 Type of FY --- " R" Costs FY ---Revenue Recu1Ting

or"NR" Non-recurring

$ $

$ $

Total: $ $

2 Form adopted: 01 / 12/05 ; revised 8/24/05 ; revised 4/ 17/08

5 6 " R" Costs - Fund Recurring or Affected "NR" Non-recurring

3. Expenditure/Revenue Narrative:

Explain revenue source(s). Include revenue calculations, grant(s) available, anticipated date of receipt of revenues/grants, etc. Explain expenditures, grant match(s), justify personnel increase(s), detail capital and operating uses, etc. (Attach supplemental page, if necessary.)

NIA.

Section D. General Narrative

I. Conflicts: Does this proposed bill/resolution duplicate/conflict with/companion to/relate to any City code, approved ordinance or resolution, other adopted policies or proposed legislation? Include details of city adopted laws/ordinance/resolutions and dates. Summarize the relationships, conflicts or overlaps.

Current City Code does not permit both a primary dwelling unit and accessory dwelling unit on the same lot to be rented, instead requiring that the owner live in one of the two units. The change proposed in this bill would permit both units to be rented, but not as short term rental units. Section 14-6.HA}(S) regarding Short Term Rentals (STR) states that STRs must be operated in compliance with the Subsection regarding Accessory Dwelling Units. There is no conflict with language between the two Subsections.

2. Consequences of Not Enacting This Bill/Resolution:

Are there consequences of not enacting this bill /resolution? If so, describe.

The status quo would remain and potential additional housing options would not be made available.

3. Technical Issues:

Are there inconect citations of law, drafting errors or other problems? Are there any amendments that should be considered? Are there any other alternatives which should be considered? If so, describe.

None identified.

4. Community Impact:

Briefly describe the major positive or negative effects the Bill/Resolution might have on the community including, but not limited to, businesses, neighborhoods, families, children and youth , social service providers and other institutions such as schools, churches, etc .

This bill is designed to ieBen HB additienal Fental heusing 0Bti0nsl ease restrictions 011 tlte /011g-term rental of botlt tlte principal and accessorv dwelling units 011 a si11gle lot without the need for large-scale new developments. Housing in the City is at a premium and this bill would ieFeate an immediate SHBBly ef additienal heusing 0Bti0nsl i11ce11tivize the development and rental of accessorv dwelling units throughout the City, helping to alleviate some oft!te housing issues the Citv faces.

3 Form adopted: 01/12/05; revised 8/24/05; revised 4/ 17/08