economic development and regulationapp.cfo.dc.gov/budget/2002/pdf/pbfp_266.pdfsubtotal nonpersonal...

BEconomicDevelopment andRegulation

(EB0)

Business Services and Economic DevelopmentFY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget: $32,839,692FY 2002 Proposed Capital Budget: $11,600,000FY 2002-FY 2007 Proposed Capital Improvements Plan: $20,200,200

The Business Services and Economic Development (BSED)cluster facilitates the creation and growth of wealth in theDistrict of Columbia and expands the revenue base bydeveloping and implementing programs and policies for theretention, expansion, and attraction of commerce and trade,including local, small, and disadvantaged business, anddeveloping and maintaining stable, diverse, and attractiveneighborhoods throughout the District of Columbia.

Strategic Issues• Coordinate planning and development activi-

ties with other District and federal agenciesinvolved in the economic, physical, and socialdevelopment of Washington, D.C.

• Produce long-term, short-term, and urban-design plans and programs, manage zoningand subdivision, maintain and communicateplanning information and data to establishstructure for development in the District.

• Develop and implement strategies and plansto redevelop targeted neighborhoods.

FY 2002 InitiativesThe agency will focus on these initiatives:• Implement Neighborhood Action and plan-

ning activities, including workshops andstrategic plans.

• Develop a District facilities plan.

Budget SummaryThe FY 2002 proposed operating budget for allfunding sources for BSED is $32,839,692, anincrease of $6,086,463, or 22.8 percent, over the FY2001 approved budget of $26,753,229 (table EB0-1).In FY 2002, this agency will receive 50 percent of itsfunding from local sources.The FY 2002 proposedbudget will support 102 FTEs, an increase of 5FTEs over FY 2001 (table EB0-2).The increase infunding and FTEs will support NeighborhoodAction activities and planning studies, initiatives toencourage economic growth and to attract high tech-nology companies, and improved review of develop-ment activity.The FY 2002 budget includes a$47,355 decrease in fixed costs for managementreform savings.

The FY 2002 capital budget for BSED is$11,600,000 and $20,200,000 for the six-year period.The capital program supports the agency through thedevelopment of programs and services for economicdevelopment.

The FY 2002 proposed operating budgetis $32,839,692, anincrease of$6,086,463, or 22.8percent, over the FY 2001 approvedbudget.

The FY 2002 capital budgettotals $11,600,000.

Business Services and Economic Development

B-1

FY 2002 Proposed D.C. Budget and Financial Plan

B-2

• Develop commercial revitalization initiatives.• Facilitate progress of the National Capital

Revitalization Corporation.

Agency BackgroundBSED, a cluster of four agencies, assists with activi-ties that foster economic growth and employmentopportunity in the District of Columbia. BSED’saim is to retain, expand, and attract business in theDistrict through strategic neighborhood revitaliza-tion policies and actions to remove blight. It strivesto facilitate opportunities for commercial andhuman capital development consistent with theeconomic, social, housing and employment needsof the residents and citizens of the District.

ProgramsBSED (figure EB0-1) provides the following pro-grams and services through its four agencies:

The Office of the Deputy Mayor forPlanning and Economic Development(DMPED) promulgates and enforces the policiesof the Mayor’s Office in the field of neighborhoodrevitalization and economic development. Theoffice helps the Mayor coordinate, plan, supervise,and, in some cases, execute programs, policies, pro-posals and functions. The office also advises theMayor on the most effective allocation of publicresources for economic development. By develop-ing and overseeing implementation of policies andprograms that revitalize neighborhoods, attracting

and retaining businesses, and fostering economicgrowth and employment opportunities, the officeworks toward its goal of strengthening the eco-nomic health and vitality of Washington, D.C.

The proposed budget for this program in FY2002 is $23,753,718. Local funding totals$7,657,292, an increase of $3,525,308, or 85 percent,over FY 2001. Local funding supports 15 FTEs.The increase will support an initiative to attract hightechnology companies to the city, feasibility studiesand economic development initiatives, and fundingto fill all available positions

An additional $1,096,426 of Other (O-type)funds supports the Industrial Revenue Bond pro-gram and 7 FTEs.The remaining $15,000,000 inOther funds is dedicated to the BusinessImprovement District (BID) program. BIDs arepublic/private partnerships eligible to retain portionsof their property taxes to finance the upkeep andmaintenance of their retail and commercial areas.

The Office of Motion Pictures and TelevisionDevelopment (OMPTD) initiates and imple-ments programs to generate revenue and stimulateemployment opportunities in the District by attract-ing and retaining film and video projection projects.

The information and communication age hascreated great demand for new forms of filmedentertainment and traditional television and com-mercial production. With the rise in demand, filmand video production has become an economicforce in the District. The Office of Motion

Figure EB0-1Business Services and Economic Development

Office of MotionPictures

Office of LocalBusiness

DevelopmentOffice of Planning

Deputy Mayor,Planning and

EconomicDevelopment

Deputy Mayor

Chief of Staff


B-3

Pictures and Television Development plays amajor role in turning creative energy from thisproduction into artistic and economic success. Bypositioning the capital at the forefront of film andvideo development, the offices provides the meansfor the District to gain from this movement.

The District has the talent and resources in

place to capture a share of lucrative production dol-lars. Filmmakers hire local residents as actors, extras,grips, gaffers and film in people’s homes and offices.Furthermore, they create a substantial number oftemporary, nonproduction jobs for local residents.

The film production companies also purchasesupplies at hardware and equipment stores, utilize

Table EB0-1FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Comptroller Source Group(dollars in thousands)


Actual Approved Proposed Change fromFY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2001

Regular Pay - Cont. Full Time 3,094 5,966 6,713 747

Regular Pay - Other 52 0 0 0

Additional Gross Pay 55 0 0 0

Fringe Benefits 398 960 1,187 227

Unknown Payroll Postings 0 0 0 0

Subtotal Personal Services (PS) 3,599 6,926 7,899 974

Supplies and Materials 137 291 240 -51

Utilities 56 31 23 -7

Communications 169 107 89 -18

Rentals - Land and Structures 553 753 762 9

Janitorial Services 0 0 18 18

Security Services 0 0 22 22

Other Services and Charges 3,196 2,760 7,042 4,282

Contractual Services 311 217 1,667 1,450

Subsidies and Transfers 8,404 15,000 15,000 0

Equipment and Equipment Rental 267 668 76 -592

Subtotal Nonpersonal Services (NPS) 13,094 19,828 24,940 5,113

Total Proposed Operating Budget 16,693 26,753 32,840 6,086

Table EB0-2FY 2002 Full-Time Equivalent Employment Levels



Continuing full time 47 97 102 5

Term full time 7 0 0 0

Total FTEs 54 97 102 5


B-4

an assortment of businesses that service the filmindustry, shop in stores, eat in restaurants, and stayin hotels. Moreover, for every dollar spent on pro-duction a percentage goes to the D.C. Treasury intaxes and unemployment benefits savings.

Furthermore, a substantial number of tempo-rary jobs are created for local residents by thisindustry. By increasing levels of production, itsprojects will provide more jobs and job-training forlocal residents.

The proposed FY 2002 operating budget forOMPTD is $462,018 and supports 4 FTEs.

The Office of Local Business Development(OLBD) fosters the economic growth of local, smalland disadvantaged businesses through supportivelegislation, business development programs, andpublic and private sector contracting opportunities.Through marketing and outreach efforts, the officecertifies companies to participate in the local smalland disadvantaged business enterprise (LSDBE)program.The office also enforces District procure-ment regulations (DC Law 12-268) and monitorsagreements made with our private partners throughthe Industrial Revenue Bond and Tax IncrementFinance programs to ensure LSDBE contractingopportunities.The proposed FY 2002 budgetincludes funding to support technical assistance foroperation of the District contract compliance sys-tems; enforcement of the Equal Opportunity forLocal, Small and Disadvantage Business EnterprisesAct of 1998; enforcement of the Blanket Order BlitzIncrease Opportunity for Local, Small andDisadvantage Business Enterprise EmergencyAmendment Act of 1999; support for the Penn-Branch Mall Business Resources Center; and thepromotion and marketing of the agency’s initiatives.

The FY 2002 proposed budget for OLBDtotals $1,043,602, an increase of $144,615 over FY2001. This increase will support outreach effortsto local businesses, update a database of all quali-fied local businesses, create online application pro-cedures, and fund a study of how District busi-nesses can better meet the city’s contracting andprocurement needs. These funds also support 10FTEs including the restoration of 2 FTEs foroutreach efforts.

The Office of Planning was designated by theMayor (Mayor’s Order 75-42 and 83-25) as thecentral planning agency for the District of

Columbia pursuant to The Home Rule Act. Theoffice helps the Mayor develop, implement, andmanage land use; coordinate planning activities;and carry out municipal planning functions.

Through genuine and inclusive planning princi-ples and a foundation of community participation,the office provides the vision and framework for pub-lic and private actions that will help create an exem-plary capital city. It also focuses on initiatives that pro-vide the greatest opportunity to improve the qualityof life in the District for many people, not just a few.The office also targets distressed neighborhoods andunderutilized areas of the city through new public,private, and community collaborations. It is therebuilding of an effective, certain, fair, credible, openand influential community planning and develop-ment review process that provides opportunities forgenuine participation. It is also using planning andthe planning process to expand opportunities andchoices for the District’s underserved population.

The Office of Planning will use theComprehensive Development Plan to restore avision and world-class planning for the District toachieve its full economic potential, beauty, and thesuperior and just quality of life exemplary of a cap-ital city of a great nation.

The Neighborhood Action program willdevelop annual strategic plans for each neighbor-hood cluster. These plans will guide the develop-ment of a citywide strategic plan and the allocationof public resources. Development review plannerswill work on zoning and historic preservation casesto accommodate the increasing volume of devel-opment activity.

The total FY 2002 operating budget for theOffice of Planning is $7,580,354 and supports 66FTEs for neighborhood planning initiatives andreview of development activities. Local funding is$7,276,627 and supports 64 FTEs , an increase of$2,369,804, or 48 percent, over FY 2001. This sig-nificant increase is necessary to implement neigh-borhood planning activities in coordination withthe Neighborhood Action program, improve thedevelopment review process, and initiate planningstudies. The proposed federal budget is $303,727and two FTEs to support the HistoricPreservation Review Board.


B-5

Funding SummaryThe proposed FY 2002 operating budget for all funding sources is $32,839,692, an increase of $6,086,463 (22.8%) over the FY 2001 approvedbudget. Refer to the FY 2002 OperatingAppendices (bound separately) for details.

LocalThe FY 2002 proposed local budget is$16,439,539, an increase of $6,086,463, or 59 per-cent, over the FY 2001 approved budget. Of thisincrease, $973,720 is in personal services and$5,112,743 is in nonpersonal services. There are 93FTEs supported by local sources, an increase of 5FTEs over FY 2001. The increase in funding and

FTEs will support neighborhood action initiatives,review of zoning, historic preservation, and otherdevelopment activity, and initiatives to encouragethe growth of high technology companies in theDistrict. The FY 2002 budget includes a decreaseof $47,355 in fixed costs for management reformsavings.

FederalThe FY 2002 proposed federal budget is$303,727, the same level as FY 2001. Federalfunds support 2 FTEs, no change from FY 2001.

Table EB0-3FY 2002 EB0 Proposed Operating Budget, by Revenue Type(dollars in thousands)


Actual Actual Actual Approved ProposedFY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002

Local 23,985 5,558 6,762 10,353 16,440

Federal 645 0 739 304 304

Other 1,326 7,171 8,384 16,096 16,096

Intra-District 1,957 0 808 0 0

Gross Funds 27,913 12,729 16,693 26,753 32,840

Figure EB0-2BSED Employment Levels, FY 1998–Proposed FY 2002(gross FTEs)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Proposed2002

Approved2001

Actual2000

Actual1999

Actual1998

Nu

mb

er o

f FT

Es

Fiscal Year


B-6

OtherThe FY 2002 proposed budget for Other (O-type)revenue sources is $16,096,426, the same level asFY 2001. The majority of these funds are dedicat-ed to the Business Improvement District program.Other funds support 7 FTEs, no change from FY2001

Capital Improvements ProgramThe agency currently has planned expenditures of$11,600,000 in FY 2002 and $20,200,000 in FY2002-FY 2007 for neighborhood revitalization ini-tiatives. No new funding is proposed for FY 2002.Refer to the FY 2002 Capital Appendices (boundseparately) for details.

Trend Data Table EB0-3 and figure EB0-2 show expenditureand employment histories for FY 1998–Proposed FY2002.

Agency Goals and Performance MeasuresThe Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning andEconomic Development is responsible for imple-menting Priority Area 3 of the Citywide StrategicPlan, Promoting Economic Development. Inaddition, the Office of the Deputy Mayor providesoversight to the Office of Planning, the Office ofLocal Business Development and the Office ofMotion Pictures and Television Development.

Priority Area 3: Promoting economic developmentManager: Eric Price, Deputy Mayor, Planning and

Economic DevelopmentSupervisor: Anthony A. Williams, Mayor

Table EB0-4Capital Improvements Plan, FY 2000 - FY 2007(Dollars in Thousands)

Business Services & Economic DevelopmentEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE

Cost Elements Through Budgeted Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Years TotalFY 2000 FY 2001 Total FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Budget Budget

a. Design: 0 210 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210

b. Site: 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,000 6,000

c. Project Mngmnt: 1,102 246 1,348 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,348

d. Construction: 10 6,180 6,191 8,600 8,600 0 0 0 0 17,200 23,391

e. Equipment: 5,373 1,068 6,441 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,441

Total: 6,486 10,704 17,190 11,600 8,600 0 0 0 0 20,200 37,390

FUNDING SCHEDULE

a. Long Term Financing: 7,590 9,600 17,190 11,600 8,600 0 0 0 0 20,200 37,390

b.Tobacco Securitization: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

c. Grants: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

d. Pay Go: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

e. Hwy Trust Fund: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

f. Equipment Lease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

g.Alternative Financing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

h. Other: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7,590 9,600 17,190 11,600 8,600 0 0 0 0 20,200 37,390


B-7

Performance Measure 3.1: Demolish vacant and aban-doned housing units

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 500 400 500 TBD

Actual N/A 601 - - -

Performance Measure 3.2: Board up, vacant, and aban-doned properties

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 1,000 1,500 1,200 1,200 TBD

Actual 679 2,038 - - -

Performance Measure 3.3: Number of new single-fami-ly and multi-family units funded through constructionloans made in the fiscal year

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003



Performance Measure 3.4: Number of single-family andmulti-family units funded through rehabilitation loansmade in the fiscal year

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 496 1,870 1,054 TBD


Performance Measure 3.5: Initiate new retail develop-ment in the District’s neighborhoods

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003


Actual N/A 1 - - -Note: Includes supermarkets, department stores, etc.

Performance Measure 3.6: Employ residents in unsubsi-dized, private sector jobs

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

Actual N/A 2,238 - - -

Goal 1. Focus economic development on targeted areas.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-

nomic developmentManager: Jacquelyn A. Flowers, DirectorSupervisor: Eric Price, Deputy Mayor for

Economic Development

Performance Measure 1.1: Number of local small anddisadvantaged businesses participating in the District’sset aside program

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 700 725 725 750


Performance Measure 1.2: Amount of contract awardsto the District’s local small and disadvantaged busi-nesses per year (millions of dollars)

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 230 400 450 500


Goal 2. Implement the Mayor’s NeighborhoodAction initiativeCitywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-

nomic developmentManager: Toni Griffin, Deputy Director for

Revitalization PlanningSupervisor: Andrew Altman, Director of Planning

Performance Measure 2.1: Number of neighborhoodassessments completed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 39 TBD TBD

Actual N/A N/A - - -

Performance Measure 2.2: Number of residentsengaged through neighborhood forums

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 4,000 1,500 3,000 TBD

Actual N/A 6,075 - - -Note: FY 2000 and FY 2002 targets include bi-annual Citizens’Summits.

Performance Measure 2.3: Number of neighborhoodaction plans completed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A N/A 39 N/A


Goal 3. Facilitate the revitalization of theAnacostia WaterfrontCitywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-




B-8

Performance Measure 3.1: Number of AnacostiaWaterfront development workshops

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 4 10 4 N/A

Actual N/A 9 - - -Note: In FY 2002, planning concludes in mid-2002.

Performance Measure 3.2: Number of people involvedin Anacostia Waterfront planning events

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 1,000 1,000 N/A

Actual N/A N/A - - -Note: Citizen participation was not measured during FY 2000.

Goal 4. Promote neighborhood revitalizationCitywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-



Performance Measure 4.1: Number of neighborhoodcommercial corridor strategies completed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A Start 2 2 TBD


Goal 5. Promote a balanced, inclusive, fair devel-opment review processCitywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-

nomic developmentManager: Ellen McCarthy, Deputy Director for

Development ReviewSupervisor: Andrew Altman, Director of Planning

Performance Measure 5.1: Number of land use media-tions

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 3 6 TBD


Performance Measure 5.2: Develop and open land usemediation center

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A Secure Open TBDfunding 1/02


Goal 6. Promote an efficient development reviewprocessCitywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-



Performance Measure 6.1: Number of zoning casesanalyzed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003


Actual 29 66 - - -

Goal 7. Increase effectiveness of historic preser-vationCitywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-



Performance Measure 7.1: Number of neighborhoodhistoric preservation workshops

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 1 3 TBD


(BJ0)

Office of Zoning FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget: $2,378,480FY 2002 Proposed Capital Budget: $0

The Office of Zoning provides administrative, professional,and technical assistance to the Zoning Commission and theBoard of Zoning Adjustment in the maintenance and regu-lation of zoning in the District of Columbia.

Agency BackgroundThe Office of Zoning is the administrative arm ofthe Zoning Commission (ZC) and the Board ofZoning Adjustment (BZA). OZ receives andprocesses applications for zoning changes or relieffrom zoning regulations; attends meetings andhearings, and provides follow-up draft decisions;coordinates the zoning process with the Office ofPlanning (OP) and other District and federalagencies; and maintains and updates zoning regu-lations (text and map). The office also responds tomiscellaneous requests of ZC and BZA members;prepares records for court cases; and handles alladministrative matters associated with the dailyfunctioning of the office.

District of Columbia zoning regulations govern land use, density, height, and bulk characteris-tics of property located within the District’s jurisdic-tion. Any individual or organization seeking toundertake new construction or make major repairs,alterations, or additions to existing buildings isrequired to file an application with the Departmentof Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA). Allprojects must conform to requirements established bythe zoning map and regulations adopted by the

Budget SummaryThe proposed FY 2002 operating budget for theOffice of Zoning (OZ) is $2,378,480, an increaseof $615,007, or 34.9 percent, over the FY 2001approved budget (table BJ0-1). The increaseincludes Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB) fundingof $582,000 primarily for map computerization.There are 17 full-time employees (FTEs) support-ed by this budget, an increase of 1 FTE over FY2001 (table BJ0-2). All funding comes from localsources.

Strategic Issues • Streamline zoning procedures to ensure a pre-

dictable, efficient, and consistent process.• Synchronize activities with federal and District

agencies.

FY 2002 Initiatives • Expand outreach and educational programs

for District residents and businesses, includingproviding 24-hour access to OZ via website.

• Complete the electronic zoning map.• Begin document imaging and data conversion

in order to provide online access to zoninginformation.

The FY 2002 pro-posed operatingbudget is$2,378,480, anincrease of$615,007, or 34.9percent, over theFY 2001 approvedbudget.

Office of Zoning

B-9


B-10

Zoning Commission. If the proposed project con-flicts with the zoning map or regulations, the appli-cant may either modify it to conform to requirementsor seek relief from the ZC or the BZA, or both.

Programs The Office of Zoning supports building and sustain-ing healthy neighborhoods by ensuring that casesdecided by the Zoning Commission and the Boardof Zoning Adjustment adhere to zoning regulations,consider good planning principles, and give “greatweight” to the concerns of Advisory NeighborhoodCommissions.The office educates District residentsand businesses about zoning and attempts to demys-tify the process. OZ also is intertwining its activitieswith those of federal and District agencies to pro-mote a more cohesive, functional government.Figure BJ0-1 displays the agency organization.

Due in part to the economic upsurge and gener-al optimism about development in the city, the officecaseload has nearly doubled. OZ has been creatingunderstandable zoning processes, increasing its use ofstate-of-the-art technology, ensuring process consis-tency, synchronizing activities with other agencies,and conducting community outreach projects.

Funding SummaryThe proposed local budget for FY 2002 is$2,378,480, an increase of $615,007 over the FY2001 approved budget. This increase is the resultof a $226,700 increase in personal services and a$388,307 increase in nonpersonal services.Significant increases include the following: Referto the FY 2002 Operating Appendices (boundseparately) for details.• $150,000 for a risk management program to

protect computer systems and to upgrade andtrain staff to better implement informationtechnologies.

• $110,000 for the interactive Zoning Web Site,which will provide 24-hour access to zoninginformation and processes.

• $240,000 to begin document imaging and dataconversion to provide online access to informa-tion about cases before the Zoning Commissionand the Board of Zoning Adjustment.

• $82,000 to upgrade and reclassify positions toimprove agency efficiency and to support anadditional FTE to enhance compliance review ofBZA/ZC decisions.

• $13,782 increase in utilities, communications,and rent.

Figure BJ0-1Office of Zoning

Support Services

Office of Zoning

ExecutiveSecretary

ZoningCommission

Board of ZoningAdjustment

Director

Public RelationsComputer SystemAdministration

Office of Zoning

B-11

Table BJ0-1FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Comptroller Source Group(dollars in thousands)

Office of ZoningActual Approved Proposed Change from

FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2001

Regular Pay - Cont. Full Time 775 876 1083 207



Fringe Benefits 113 144 164 19

Unknown Payroll Postings 0 0 0 0

Subtotal Personal Services (PS) 1,020 1,020 1,247 227

Supplies and Materials 17 54 56 2

Utilities 1 14 16 2

Communications 13 4 13 9

Rent - Land and Structures 0 15 18 2



Other Services and Charges 103 532 846 314

Contractual Services 49 54 92 38

Equipment and Equipment Rental 18 71 71 0

Subtotal Nonpersonal Services (NPS) 202 743 1,132 388

Total Proposed Operating Budget 1,222 1,763 2,378 615

Table BJ0-2 FY 2002 Full-Time Equivalent Employment Levels

Office of Zoning




Total FTEs 16 16 17 1

The Office of Zoning receives 100 percent ofits funding from local sources. There are 17 FTEssupported by this budget, an increase of 1 FTEover FY 2001.

Trend Data Table BJ0-3 and figure BJ0-2 show expenditureand employment histories for FY 1998–FY 2002.

Agency Goals and Performance MeasuresGoal 1. Create a convenient, easy-to-use, andunderstandable zoning process.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Promoting

economic development; Making governmentwork

Manager: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIASupervisor: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIA


B-12

Performance Measure 1.1: Percentage of total plannedWeb site completed to allow 24-hour access to theOffice of Zoning

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 10 25 35 50

Actual NA 10 — — —

Performance Measure 1.2: Percentage of interactivefeatures on Web site finished

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA NA NA 35 60

Actual NA NA — — —

Goal 2. Revolutionize service delivery throughthe use of technology.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Promoting

economic development; Making governmentwork

Manager: Nyambi A. Nyambi, AICPSupervisor: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIA

Performance Measure 2.1: Percentage of electroniczoning map complete

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 30 90 100 100


Table BJ0-3FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Revenue Type(dollars in thousands)

Office of ZoningActual Actual Actual Approved Proposed

FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002

Local 435 400 1,222 1,763 2,378

Federal 0 595 0 0 0

Other 277 453 0 0 0

Gross Funds 712 1,449 1,222 1,763 2,378

Figure BJ0-2BJ0 Employment Levels, FY 1998–Proposed FY 2002(gross FTEs)

10

15

20

Proposed2002

Approved2001

Actual2000

Actual1999

Actual1998

Nu

mb

er o

f FT

Es

Fiscal Year

Office of Zoning

B-13

Performance Measure 2.2: Percentage of electronicreading room complete

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 0 30 40 50


Performance Measure 2.3: Percentage of documentsscanned for electronic storage

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 5 8 20 20


Goal 3. Streamline zoning procedures to ensurea predictable, efficient, and consistent process.citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Building and sus-

taining healthy neighborhoods; Promotingeconomic development; Making governmentwork

Manager: Sheri M. Pruitt; Alberto Bastida, AICPSupervisor: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIA

Performance Measure 3.1: Number of BZA/ZC applications filed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 160 190 200 210

Actual 118 181 — — —

Performance Measure 3.2: Number of BZA/ZCapplications processed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 140 190 200 210

Actual 116 188 — — —

Performance Measure 3.3: Percentage of zoning regu-lations modernized

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA NA 30 70 100


Goal 4. Synchronize activities with federal andDistrict agencies.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Promoting eco-

nomic development; Making governmentwork; Unity of purpose and democracy

Manager: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIA; Nyambi A.Nyambi, AICP

Supervisor: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIA

Performance Measure 4.1: Percentage of the Office ofZoning’s processes that are intertwined and coordinat-ed with other federal and District agencies includingcitywide Mapping

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 10 40 60 80


Performance Measure 4.2: Percent of Hansen Systemimplemented, which will allow the agency to electron-ically share and retrieve information from other Districtagencies

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 10 60 80 100


Goal 5. Create an expansive outreach and educa-tional program for District residents and business.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Promoting

economic development; Making governmentwork; Unity of purpose and democracy

Manager: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIASupervisor: Jerrily R. Kress, FAIA

Performance Measure 5.1: Number of community out-reach seminars conducted

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 3 8 10 10


Performance Measure 5.2: Number of responses toonline zoning inquiries

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA NA 120 250 300


Performance Measure 5.3: Number of times the infor-mational video library, including in-house cassettesand online access, is used

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA NA NA 100 200



B-14

(DB0)

Department of Housing andCommunity Development FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget: $57,889,980FY 2002 Proposed Capital Budget: $19,546,000FY 2002-FY 2007 Proposed Capital Improvements Plan: $35,842,000

The Department of Housing and Community Developmentfacilitates the production and preservation of housing, andcommunity and economic development opportunities inpartnership with for-profit and nonprofit organizations byleveraging Department of Housing and CommunityDevelopment dollars with other financing resources in orderto create and maintain stable neighborhoods and retain andexpand the District’s tax base.

tion of District properties. The FY 2002 budgetincludes a $11,009 decrease in fixed costs for man-agement reform.

The proposed capital budget for FY 2002 is$19,546,000, and totals $35,842,000 for the periodFY 2002-FY 2007.

Strategic Issues• Increase homeownership opportunities and

expand development efforts throughout the city.• Increase homeownership opportunities by

offering financial assistance to low andmoderate income residents.

• Maintain affordable housing opportunities andpromote the renovation and purchase of agingand abandoned houses.

FY 2002 Initiatives• Continue to develop activities that focus on

generating affordable housing opportunitiesand improving housing services for residents.

Budget Summary The proposed FY 2002 operating budget for theDepartment of Housing and CommunityDevelopment (DHCD) is $57,889,980, an increaseof $9,616,701, or 19.9 percent, over the FY 2001approved budget (table DB0-1).The increase con-sists of $750,000 to manage the disposition ofDistrict property, $3,000,000 for housing initia-tives, $275,000 of Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB)funds for economic development, and additionalOther Revenue and Federal grants for housingprograms. DHCD will receive 73 percent of itsoverall funding in FY 2002 from Federal sources,specifically the Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment.This agency receives 13 percent ofits funding from local sources and 14 percent formOther-type sources.

Full-time equivalent (FTE) positions willincrease from the current level of 144 to 150 in FY2002 (table DB0-2). The increase is attributable tothe added funding needed to manage the disposi-

The FY 2002 pro-posed operatingbudget is$57,889,980, anincrease of$9,616,701, or 19.9percent, over theFY 2001 approvedbudget.

The FY 2002 pro-posed capitalbudget is$19,546,000, anincrease of$9,546,000, or 95percent, over theFY 2001 approvedbudget.

Department of Housing and Community Development

B-15


B-16

Agency Background The major priorities of the Department ofHousing and Community Development are toincrease home-ownership opportunities andexpand economic development efforts throughoutthe city, and to ensure that the department’s manyhousing and economic development programsintegrate with other city and private resources toachieve greater stabilization of neighborhoods. Inhousing, DHCD increases home-ownershipopportunities by offering financial assistance tolow- and moderate-income residents. In addition,the department supports efforts to maintainaffordable housing opportunities and promotes thepurchase and renovation of aging and abandonedhouses. The department’s economic developmentactivities focus on generating new business oppor-tunities that create jobs and give residents easyaccess to quality retail products and services.

DHCD is the recipient of federal entitlementgrants that enable it to fulfill its mission. Thegrants are provided by the U.S. Department ofHousing and Urban Development (HUD), inresponse to the District’s submission of a five-yearConsolidated Plan—a single comprehensive docu-ment concerning housing and community devel-opment needs, strategies, and action plans for theDistrict. These entitlement grants include:• Community Development Block Grant

(CDBG)• Home Investment Partnership (HOME)• Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with

AIDS (HOPWA), which is managed out ofthe Department of Health

ProgramsThe department’s main programs fall into five cat-egories (figure DB0-1).

Homebuyer Assistance and HousingRecycling and Preservation promotes new home-ownership and protects existing ownershipthroughout most of the residential areas of the city.Home-buyer assistance is provided through theHousing Purchase Assistance Program, the HomeOwnership Developers Incentive Fund, whichhelps lower the cost of certain newly constructedhousing units for eligible purchasers, and theTenant’s Apartment Purchase Program. Recyclingof abandoned and vacant housing is conductedthrough the Homestead Housing PreservationProgram. Assistance for preservation of homeownership is provided through the Single FamilyResidential Rehabilitation Program and the SeniorCitizen Home Repair and Improvement Program.

HUD offers a variety of grant programs topublic and nonprofit housing developers toencourage home ownership of public housing andhousing that is owned by local governments or hasbeen obtained through foreclosure under federalinsurance programs. Funds provide assistance forboth planning and development of affordablehousing for lower-income households.

Affordable Housing Production supports theDistrict of Columbia’s commitment to increase theamount of affordable housing available through con-struction of new housing and preservation of aginghousing stock.The thrust to produce affordablehousing, through its creation and renovation, is partof an overall effort to maintain healthy and viableneighborhoods for all District residents, includingsegments of the population with special needs.

Figure DB0-1Department of Housing and Community Development

Affordable HousingProduction

CommunityOrganization

SupportHomeless Support

and PreventionGeneral

Administration andOverhead

HomebuyerAssistance and

Housing Recyclingand Preservation

Director

Economic andCommercialDevelopment


B-17

Particularly encouraging is additional ownershiphousing in areas with high concentrations of lower-income or rental housing, to bring more balance andstability to those areas.The department supportsneighborhood improvement efforts to achieve anoverall positive impact on neighborhood conditionsand livability. Supplemented by significant private-

sector financing, all of the programs in this initiativesupport the home ownership goal and help broadenthe base of affordable housing in the District.

Community Organizations Support fundsnonprofit, community-based organizations thatprovide services such as comprehensive housingcounseling to low- and moderate-income house-

Table DB0-1FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Comptroller Source Group (dollars in thousands)



Regular Pay - Cont. full Time 6,615 7,928 7,762 -116



Fringe Benefits 943 1,202 1,164 -39

Subtotal Personal Services (PS) 7,592 9,189 9,104 (84)


Utilities 45 6 22 16

Communications 58 322 87 -235

Rentals - Land and Structures 1,310 1,198 1,374 176


Other Services and charges 5,692 3,071 2,440 -631

Contractual Services 3,667 3,952 3,725 -227

Subsidies and Transfers 28,300 30,385 40,791 10,405

Equipment and Equipment Rental 238 114 202 88


Total Proposed Operating Budget 46,947 48,273 57,890 9,617

Table DB0-2FY 2002 Full-Time Equivalent Employment Levels





Total FTEs 113 144 150 6


B-18

holds in the District, intake of applications, andcommunity outreach and education. It also pro-vides funding for fair housing studies, informationto citizens regarding fair housing, and special grantfunds designed to give community developmentcorporations (CDCs) the ability to take financialstakes in strategic business and economic develop-ment projects in their service communities.

Homeless Support and Prevention willaward Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) funds tothe Community Partnership for the Prevention ofHomelessness to help provide services and facili-ties within the continuum of care for homelesspersons. ESG-funded services and facilities sup-ported will include prevention, outreach done inconnection with established drop-in centers, reno-vation work at shelter sites, and the provision ofhypothermia hotline services during the hypother-mia season of 2001-2002.

Economic and Commercial Development isresponsible for the District’s strategy to stimulateemployment and business opportunities for resi-dents as part of its effort to create and maintainhealthy and viable neighborhoods. An importantvehicle for achieving this strategy is to build theneighborhood community development corpora-tions’ capacity to stimulate economic developmentactivity in their respective service areas. The citywill focus on improving its existing economicdevelopment programs and negotiating with pri-vate lenders for targeted, creative financing of eco-nomic development in key geographic and mar-keting areas where public funds can effectivelyleverage private financing. The District will alsofocus on encouraging private lenders to providefinancing opportunities under the CommunityReinvestment Act and monitor compliance.

The District will enhance its efforts to retainbusinesses in and attract them to the city, payingspecial attention to tax and regulatory provisionsthat adversely affect operating in the District.Targeted District-owned sites will be identified formarketing and development, thereby providing vis-ible anchors for economic revitalization and neigh-borhood stabilization. Also of prime importance isthe creation of small and minority-owned business-es in underserved markets in the city, includingmonitoring and enforcing local contracting andemployment goals for District firms and residents.

Funding SummaryLocalThe proposed local budget is $7,715,626, an increaseof $4,013,426 over the FY 2001 approved budget.Of this increase, $464,299 is in personal services and$3,549,127 is in nonpersonal services. There are 13FTEs supported by local sources, an increase of 6FTEs over FY 2001. Refer to the FY 2002Operating Appendices (bound separately) for details.Increases in funding and FTEs include the following:• $3,000,000 associated with housing initiatives

for low and moderate income persons, includ-ing funding for the Home Purchase AssistanceProgram, the Single Family ResidentialRehabilitation Program, and the TenantApartment Purchase Program.

• $750,000 and 6 FTEs to support responsibilitiesassociated with the disposition of District land.

• $275,000 from Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB)funds for economic development initiatives.

FederalThe proposed federal budget is $42,168,080, a netincrease of $2,059,001 from the FY 2001approved budget. This includes a decrease of$548,557 in personal services offset by an increaseof $2,607,558 in nonpersonal services based on theanticipated receipt of additional Federal funding topromote housing initiatives. There are 137 FTEssupported by Federal sources.

OtherThe proposed Other budget is $8,006,274, anincrease of $3,544,274 over the FY 2001 approvedbudget. This increase is the result of additionalrevenue from Home Purchase Assistance Program(HPAP) loan payments, which are being reinvest-ed in the HPAP program. There are no FTESsupported by other sources.

Capital Improvements DHCD’s capital program focuses on the develop-ment of housing programs throughout the Districtof Columbia (table DB0-3).The agency providesassistance to revitalize blighted communities, pro-mote economic development, and create opportuni-ties for low- and moderate-income residents of theDistrict.To accomplish this goal, the departmentleverages capital dollars and uses private resources.


B-19

The department currently has three capitalprojects with total financing to date of $35 million.These ongoing projects focus on the developmentof affordable housing, economic development ofthe Southwest Waterfront, and public infrastruc-ture improvements to the Fort Lincoln community.Ongoing projects will cost $8.8 million in FY 2002and $23.4 in FY 2002-FY 2007.

The proposed budget for the Department ofHousing and Community Development’s capitalprogram is $19.5 million in FY 2002 and a total of$35.8 million over the next six years. The agencywill receive additional funding for the followingaffordable housing projects:• The East Capitol Dwelling project is an initia-

tive to provide affordable housing to theAnacostia community. The project, to whichthe District has already committed $10 mil-lion, is supported with federal Hope VI fund-ing for community development. In addition,

the project has a retail component to attractand promote economic revitalization. The FY2002 planned expenditures are $7 million.They are $7 million for FY 2002–FY 2007.

• The Far SE and SW Bellevue project is aninitiative to revitalize several District commu-nities. The focus of the project will concentrateon a four-block radius. The project will consistof the acquisition, demolition, and abatementof abandoned properties to support a newtownhouse community. Planned expendituresare $3.7 million in FY 2002 and $5.4 millionfor FY 2002–FY 2007.

Trend DataTable DB0-3 and figure DB0-2 show expenditureand employment history for FY 1998–FY 2002.

Table DB0-3Capital Improvement Plan, FY 2002–FY 2007(dollars in thousands)

Department of Housing and Community DevelopmentEXPENDITURE SCHEDULE

Cost Elements Through Budgeted Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6 Years TotalFY 2000 FY 2001 Total FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Budget Budget

a. Design 116 0 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116

b. Site 0 2,000 2,000 4,774 266 0 0 0 0 5,040 7,040

c. Project Management: 104 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104

d. Construction 12,109 8,000 20,109 14,772 7,120 3,910 2,500 2,500 0 30,802 50,911

e. Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 12,329 10,000 22,329 19,546 7,386 3,910 2,500 2,500 0 35,842 58,171

FUNDING SCHEDULE

a. Long-term Financing 19,826 5,000 24,826 17,546 6,890 3,910 2,500 2,500 0 33,346 58,171

b.Tobacco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

c. Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

d. Pay go 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

e. Hwy Trust Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

f. Equipment lease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

g. Alternative financing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

h. Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 19,826 5,000 24,826 17,546 6,890 3,910 2,500 2,500 0 33,346 58,171


B-20

Agency Goals andPerformance MeasuresGoal 1. Increase homeownership opportunitiesfor DC residents.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Building and sus-

taining healthy neighborhoodsManagers: William Jameson, Administrator,

Home Purchase Assistance Program andHousing Finance Agency 4% Loan Program,Sheila Williams, Administrator, Residential &Community Services (Conversions)

Supervisor: Vanessa Akins, Deputy Director,Residential & Community Services

Measure 1.1: Number of Home Purchase AssistanceProgram (HPAP) first-time homeowner loans awarded

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 370 433 560 TBD

Actual 576 396 — — —Note: Original FY 2000 target of 473 reduced to 370 due toreduced funding and changed market conditions.

Measure 1.2: Number of (below-market) DC HousingFinance Agency (DCHFA) homeowner loans awarded

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA NA 20 30 TBD


Measure 1.3: Number of rentals converted to ownershipFiscal Year

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 60 120 TBD TBD


Table DB0-4FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Revenue Type(dollars in thousands)



Local 3,693 2,961 3,988 3,702 7,716

Federal 57 43,888 39,737 40,109 42,168

Other 3,238 4,144 1,898 4,462 8,006

Intra-District 8,000 1,412 1,324 0 0

Gross Funds 14,987 52,405 46,947 48,273 57,890

Figure DB0-2DHCD Employment Levels, FY 1998–Proposed FY 2002(gross FTEs)

90

120

150

Proposed2002

Approved2001

Actual2000

Actual1999

Actual1998

Nu

mb

er o

f FT

Es

Fiscal Year


B-21

Goal 2. Revitalize neighborhood housing.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Building and sus-

taining healthy neighborhoodsManagers: Jerry Williamson, Chief, Development

Finance Division; Sheila Williams,Administrator R&CS; Lynn French,Administrator, Homestead Program

Supervisors: Neal Drobenare, Chief OperatingOfficer; Vanessa Akins, Deputy Director,Residential and Community Services, (R&CS)

Measure 2.1: Number of single-family and multi-familyunits funded through rehabilitation loans made in fiscalyear

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 496 1,870 1,054 TBD

Actual NA 500 — — —Note: Performance measure reflects units funded in particular fis-cal year.

Measure 2.2: Number of new single family and multi-family units funded through construction loans made infiscal year

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003


Actual NA 441 — — —Note: Performance measure reflects units funded in particular fis-cal year.

Measure 2.3: Number of vacant/tax delinquent propertiessold to first time homebuyers in the Homestead Program

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003


Actual 196 174 — — —Note: FY 2001 actual sales take place in Homestead Lottery inAugust 01; title clearance is on target for the August lottery.

Goal 3. Encourage community development andprovide support services.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Strengthening

children, youth, families and individuals;Building and sustaining healthy neighborhoods

Managers: Jerry Williamson, Chief, DevelopmentFinance Division; Sheila Williams,Administrator, Residential & CommunityServices

Supervisors: Neal Drobenare, Chief OperatingOfficer; Vanessa Akins, Deputy Director,Residential & Community Services

Measure 3.1: Number of persons served with homelesshousing services

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 500 5,000 5,000 TBD

Actual 650 6,965 — — —Note: ESG grantee, Community Partnership for Prevention ofHomelessness, reports the number of homeless persons reachedby outreach and hotline service, eviction prevention grants, andtransportation to shelters.

Measure 3.2: Number of permanent and temporary jobsretained or created

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000

Actual 450 2,258 — — —

Measure 3.3: Number of neighborhood support commu-nity and commercial facilities completed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003



Measure 3.4: Number of neighborhood support commu-nity and commercial facilities underway

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003



Measure 3.5: Number of District-owned properties soldfor re-development

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003


Actual NA NA — — —Note: Two Land Disposition Agreements (LDA) entered and threeRequests for Proposals (RFP) issued as of April 2001.

Goal 4. Provide special housing support services.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Building and sus-

taining healthy neighborhoodsManager: Jerry Williamson, Chief, Development

Finance Division; Sheila Williams,Administrator, Residential and CommunityServices

Supervisors: Neal Drobenare, Chief OperatingOfficer; Vanessa Akins, Deputy Director,Residential and Community Services


B-22

Measure 4.1: Number of households receiving housingopportunity counseling, including homeownershipcounseling

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 6,000 6,000 6,000 TBD

Actual NA 7,521 — — —

Measure 4.2: Number of households receiving emer-gency grants and other support services

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003


Actual NA NA — — —Note: Information from grantee, measure emphasize outreach;see measure 3.1 above.

Goal 5. Improve financial management.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Making govern-

ment workManager: Jerry Williamson, Chief, Development

Finance DivisionSupervisor: Neal Drobenare, Chief Operating

Officer

Measure 5.1: Time to process Development FinanceLoans (months)

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 6.0 6.0 6.0 TBD

Actual NA 5.5 — — —Note: Measure applies to FY 2001 when NOFA is issued.

Measure 5.2: Public to private leverage on financedprojects

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 1:4 1:4 1:4 1:4

Actual NA 1:5 — — —

Measure 5.3: Loan delinquency rate (percent)Fiscal Year

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target NA 20 20 20 20


(CF0)

Department of EmploymentServices FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget: $80,476,603FY 2002 Proposed Capital Budget: $0

The Department of Employment Services serves as theprimary vehicle for the District of Columbia to develop aworld-class work force and work environment that supportsa sound, stable economic foundation for families, individuals,and the general community.

Major changes are as follows:• $5,045,497 increase for the Employment and

Training Administration, including an increasein Other (O-type) revenue of $2 million in theUnemployment Insurance Administrativeaccount and $438,000 in Reed Act funds

• $4,365,496 decrease for the Office of LaborStandards

• $1,457,252 decrease in AdministrativeOperations

Strategic IssuesIn FY 2002, DOES policies and programs will cutacross several citywide strategic priority areas. Inparticular, the department will:• Introduce District youth, especially those not

in school, to a variety of careers and real-lifeexperiences.

• Maximize opportunities for citizens to securegainful employment and become self-sufficient.

It accomplishes this by planning, developing, andadministering—in collaboration with the privatesector, community-based organizations, and othergovernment agencies—effective and efficientemployment and employment-related services toall segments of the Washington metropolitan population. These services include meaningfulemployment and training opportunities, provisionof labor market information, timely payments toeligible unemployed individuals and injured work-ers, counseling and supportive services, and pro-motion of healthy and productive work places foremployees and employers.

Budget SummaryThe FY 2002 proposed operating budget for theDepartment of Employment Services (DOES) is$80,476,603, a decrease of $334,957, or 0.4percent, from the FY 2001 approved budget (tableCF0-1). It supports 580 full-time equivalents(FTEs), a decrease of 70 from FY 2001 (tableCF0-2). The agency receives 91 percent of itsfunding from non-local sources. Only 9 percent ofits funding comes from local sources.

The FY 2002 proposed operating budgetis $80,476,603, adecrease of$334,957, or 0.4 percent, from the FY 2001approved budget.

Department of Employment Services

B-23


B-24

FY 2002 Initiatives • Combine school-based with work-based

learning experiences to introduce Districtyouth, especially those not in school, to avariety of careers and real-life experiences.

• Implement the Virtual One-Stop andInternet-based customer management systemthroughout DOES’s career centers (One-Stops) to maximize opportunities for citizensto secure gainful employment and becomeself-sufficient.

• Place more local residents in apprenticeshipand pre-apprenticeship programs to preparethem for high-wage, high-demand jobs.

• Increase employment opportunities for cityresidents through such efforts as the FirstSource Employment Agreement.

Agency BackgroundThe Department of Employment Services wasestablished in 1976 by order of the Mayor as autho-rized by both local and federal statutes.The primaryrole of the department is to facilitate the exchange ofhuman labor for wages, and to assure that there is asuccessful match between the skills needed byemployers and the job skills of citizens seekingemployment; to this end, it offers training andretraining opportunities. DOES also plays an extend-ed role in the marketplace; for example, it:• Softens the economic impact on workers

during periods of unemployment.• Administers wage standards.• Assures that local workplaces are healthy

and safe and that workers who are injured atwork and their families do not suffer economicdestitution.

ProgramsDOES has responsibility for the following majorprogram areas: Executive Direction, Office of theChief Financial Officer, Office of LaborStandards, Employment and Training,Administrative Operations, and AdministrativeSupport and Technical Assistance (figure CF0-1).

Executive Direction provides overall policy andmanagement leadership to DOES. It monitors thequality of service delivered, determines organiza-tional strengths and weaknesses, and provides theagency with the proper means to improve customersatisfaction. It arranges for staff counseling and forthe training necessary to enhance customer services.It coordinates the administration of programs andservices for youth and adults who experience multi-ple barriers to accessing training and employmentopportunities, and provides the necessary supportsystems and structures for participants to successful-ly transition into meaningful job opportunities thatcan result in self-sufficiency.

Executive Direction is also responsible for (1) pro-mulgating standards for occupational safety andhealth, (2) monitoring apprenticeship standards andapprentice/employer rights, (3) administering compre-hensive legal services relating to all DOES programs,(4) keeping the public informed about its activities andprograms, and (5) collecting, analyzing, generating,and disseminating labor market information.

Funding for this unit in FY 2002 from allsources totals $5,604,830, an increase of $87,478over FY 2001. Personal services are $5,256,530, andnonpersonal services are $348,300.The funding sup-ports 90 FTEs, a decrease of 1 FTE from FY 2001.

The Office of the Chief Financial Officerprovides day-to-day management of DOES finan-

Figure CF0-1The Department of Employment Services

Chief FinancialOfficer Labor Standards

Employment andTraining

AdministrativeOperations

AdministrativeSupport and

TechnicalAssistance

Executive Direction

Department ofEmployment

Services


B-25

cial functions, including budgeting and payroll.Funding in FY 2002 from all sources totals

$2,422,242, a decrease of $83,184 from FY 2001.Personal services is $1,887,842, and nonpersonalservices is $534,400. The budget supports 33FTEs, a decrease of 4 FTEs from FY 2001.

The Office of Labor Standards administerscomprehensive programs that protect and serveworkers on their job sites. The office:• Establishes regulations for minimum wage and

overtime payment.• Maintains a comprehensive safety and health

program that ensures a safe and healthful workenvironment for employees and general usersof District government facilities.

• Enforces laws that provide income replace-ment and medical service benefits to cityresidents who sustain work-related injuries orillnesses.

• Issues decisions on entitlements to benefits

Table CF0-1FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Comptroller Source Group(dollars in thousands)

Department of Employment ServicesActual Approved Proposed Change from

FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2001

Regular Pay - Cont. Full Time 22,270 25,342 23,361 -1,982

Regular Pay - Other 228 1,735 1,684 -51

Additional Gross Pay 2,201 158 244 86

Fringe Benefits 3,822 4,513 4,073 -439

Subtotal Personal Services (PS) 28,521 31,748 29,362 (2,386)


Utilities 635 819 883 64

Communications 846 1,181 1,077 -104

Rentals - Land and Structures 1,222 2,989 2,490 -499


Other Services and Charges 5,806 4,505 7,126 2,621

Contractual services, other 6,175 7,633 4,012 -3,621

Subsidies and Transfers 23,075 29,262 32,337 3,075

Equipment and Equipment Rental 1,326 2,315 1,895 -420


Total Proposed Operating Budget 68,090 80,812 80,477 (335)

Table CF0-2FY 2002 Full-Time Equivalent Employment Levels

Department of Employment ServicesActual Approved Proposed Change from

FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2001

Continuing full time 442.50 596.00 528.50 -67.50

Term full time 57.25 53.95 51.50 -2.45

Total FTEs 499.75 649.95 580.00 (69.95)


B-26

under DOES compensation programs thatgovern the private sector as well as Districtgovernment employees.

• Ensures the award of compensation benefits tocity employees who sustain job-related injuriesor illnesses and to eligible survivors of employ-ees whose cause of death is directly related to awork injury or illness.Proposed funding for this unit for FY 2002

from all sources totals $15,532,139, a decrease of$4,365,496 from FY 2001. Personal services is$6,991,387 and nonpersonal services is$8,540,752. This budget supports 139 FTEs, adecrease of 12 FTEs from FY 2001.

In FY 2002 the D.C. Office of Personnel(DCOP) will administer the DisabilityCompensation Fund rather than DOES. A totalof $4,113,930 in local funds and 5 FTEs will betransferred from DOES to DCOP.

The Employment and TrainingAdministration’s mission is to plan, administer,develop policy, and coordinate more than a dozenemployment and training-related program areas infour major operational areas: UnemploymentCompensation, One-Stop Operations, WorkforceDevelopment, and Youth Programs. Services aredelivered through:• Youth Employment Act programs, such as the

Summer Youth Program, federal WorkforceInvestment Act programs for youth, thedisadvantaged, and dislocated workers

• The Unemployment Insurance program• The District’s apprenticeship program• The Senior Community Service Employment

project• All Job Service programs mandated under the

Wagner-Peyser law that form the underpin-ning of the State Employment Service, AlienLabor Certification, the Disabled VeteransOutreach Program and the Local VeteransEmployment Representatives, as well as aseries of other local initiatives.

The proposed FY 2002 budget provides fundingfor the following:• Several Youth Opportunity Centers linked to

the DOES Web site, the Virtual One-Stopsystem, through a five-year, $32 million YouthOpportunities Grant (YOG)

• Implementation of the virtual One-Stop

career centers to provide many services, such asInternet access, online job listings, careercounseling and planning, resume assistance,direct job placement in the private sector,classroom training, and on-the-job training.These include:• Apprenticeship programs for residents,

such as in construction for the new D.C.Convention Center and with theMetropolitan Washington AirportAuthority and CVS/Pharmacy (for apharmacy technician program)

• Efforts to increase employment opportu-nities for city residents, including:• The “First Source Employment

Agreement,” which guarantees 51percent of all new hires during theconstruction phase of the ConventionCenter are city residents

• Helping local technology firmsidentify e-commerce and telecommu-nications labor force needs

• Job training programs (includingMetroTech) tailored to employer needs

• Placing residents in technologyoccupations

• Regional Jobs Access/ReverseCommute Program for job place-ments in the suburbs

• Customized training arrangementswith businesses in targeted industries.

Funding in FY 2002 for Employment andTraining from all sources totals $51,703,125, anincrease of $5,045,497, over FY 2001. Personalservices is $14,282,231, and nonpersonal services is$37,420,894. The budget supports 296 FTEs, adecrease of 13 FTEs from FY 2001. The mostsignificant change was in Other funds, whichincreased by $2,603,000. Federal funds increased by$1,647,700 and local funds by $794,797.

For the Administrative Operations division, aservice unit that supports other divisions, funding inFY 2002 from all sources totals $3,950,867, adecrease of $1,457,252 from FY 2001. Of this, per-sonal services is $943,885, and nonpersonal services is$3,006,982.The division’s budget supports 22 FTEs,a decrease of 40 FTEs from FY 2001 budget.

Expenses for the Administrative Support andTechnical Assistance Program (AS&TA) are for


B-27

nonpersonal services associated with allocable costamong different funding sources for supplies,materials, equipment, and machinery.

Funding for AS&TA’s overhead in FY 2002from all sources totals $1,263,400, an increase of$438,000 over FY 2001. The entire budget con-sists of nonpersonal services; it supports no FTEs.

Funding SummaryLocal The proposed local budget is $7,308,603, a decreaseof $4,662,957 from the FY 2001 approved budget.This budget supports 44 FTEs, a decrease of 27FTEs from FY 2001. Refer to the FY 2002Operating Appendices (bound separately) fordetails. Local funds are decreased by:• $328,636 due to data center consolidation,

which will transfer 34 positions and funds tothe Office of the Chief Technology Officer

• $4,113,930, and 5 FTEs, from the transfer ofthe Disability Compensation Fund adminis-tration to the Office of Personnel.

• Seven unfunded FTEs• $663, 511 for management reform savings• $306,880 for other adjustments.Local funds are increased by:• $250,000 to create a Youth Advisory Council

composed of 32 District-wide youth that willprovide the voice of the District’s youth inadvising key leadership in the city about poli-cies, programs, and actions that affect them

• $500,000 for transportation subsidies for wel-fare recipients.

FederalThe proposed federal budget is $53,624,000, anincrease of $1,837,000 over the FY 2001 approvedbudget. Approximately 68 percent of the budget isderived from Workforce Investment Act, 17 percentfrom Unemployment Insurance, 8 percent fromEmployment Services, 5 percent from Miscellaneous(including Welfare-to-Work), and 2 percent fromLabor Market Information.This budget supports378 FTEs, a decrease of 29 FTEs from 2001.

PrivateThe proposed private revenue budget is $109,000,unchanged from the FY 2001 approved budget.Thisbudget supports no FTEs, unchanged from FY 2001.

OtherThe proposed Other revenue budget is$19,435,000, an increase of $2,491,000 over theFY 2001 approved budget. The Other funds bud-get includes the Workers’ Compensation SpecialFund, workers’ compensation payments from pri-vate sector employers, interest and penalties (fromemployers delinquent in paying employer taxes),Reed Act funds, and the unemployment insurancesurcharge account (collected from employers). Thebudget supports 158 FTEs, a decrease of 14 FTEsfrom FY 2001.

Included in FY 2002 Other funds is$2,000,000 of $7,800,000 collected in excess rev-enue between 1992 and 1993 from the one-timeUnemployment Insurance tax surcharge. This sur-charge was originally intended to pay interest onloans to the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund,but collections exceeded interest payments by $5.5million. The funds will be used to improve admin-istration of the unemployment insurance programby the Employment and Training Administration.

Trend DataTable CF0-3 and figure CF0-2 show expenditureand employment histories for FY 1998 throughproposed FY 2002.

Agency Goals and Performance MeasuresGoal 1. Provide a wide range of employment andtraining activities to support the District’s youthin their transition from school to careers.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Strengthening

children, youth, families and individualsManager: Kenneth Osborne, Acting Associate

Director Office of Youth ProgramsSupervisor: Keith Cross, Deputy Director

Operations

Performance Measure 1.1: Number of youth placed insummer jobs

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 6,50010,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

Actual 10,223 7,704 - - -


B-28

Performance Measure 1.2: Number of youth placed inyear-round internships and work experiences

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 650 1,000 1,000 1,000

Actual N/A 695 - - -Note: Actual figures for FY 2001 will be available at the conclusionof the programs.

Goal 2. Provide employment and training ser-vices to District residents, including TemporaryAssistance to Needy Families to support theirtransition to employment.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Strengthening

children, youth, families and individuals;

Building and sustaining healthy neighborhoodsManager: Charles Jones, Acting Chief Welfare to

Work Division Supervisor: Keith Cross, Deputy Director

Operations

Performance Measure 2.1: Number of TANF/Welfare toWork recipients placed in unsubsidized employment

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 1,000 1,000 1,000


Table CF0-3FY 2002 CF0 Proposed Operating Budget, by Revenue Type(dollars in thousands)



Local 7,543 7,923 11,253 11,972 7,309

Federal 32,379 33,762 41,371 51,787 53,624

Private 380 10,991 88 109 109

Other 12,188 0 12,536 16,944 19,435

Intra-District 1,480 764 2,842 0 0

Gross Funds 53,970 53,440 68,090 80,812 80,477

Figure CF0-2DOES Employment Levels, FY 1998 – Proposed FY 2002(gross FTEs)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Proposed2002

Approved2001

Actual2000

Actual1999

Actual1998

Nu

mb

er o

f FT

Es

Fiscal Year


B-29

Performance Measure 2.2: Number of TANF/Welfare toWork participants placed in subsidized or transitionalemployment

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 330 500 500 500


Goal 3. Provide a wide range of employment andtraining activities to support adults seeking toenter the workforce.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Strengthening

children, youth, families and individuals;Building and sustaining healthy neighborhoods

Manager: Lewis Brown, Associate Director Officeof Apprenticeship; Samuel Love, AssociateDirector One Stop Center Operations

Supervisor: Keith Cross, Deputy Director, Operations

Performance Measure 3.1: Number of residents placedin pre-apprenticeship and step-up programs

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 45 70 105 115 120

Actual 68 101 - - -

Performance Measure 3.2: Percentage of DOES regis-tered customers placed in jobs

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 17 17 20 20 21

Actual 16 17 - - -

Performance Measure 3.3: Number of customersaccessing services through the agency’s one-stopcareer center system (thousands)

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 45.0 50.0 50.0


Goal 4. Ensure compliance with minimum wageand overtime laws, and health and safety regula-tions.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Making govern-

ment workManager: Reginald Berry, Assistant Director Labor

StandardsSupervisor: Gregory Irish, Director

Performance Measure 4.1: Amount of back wages col-lected from employers (thousands of dollars)

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 500 525 550 575 600

Actual 645 709 - - -

Performance Measure 4.2: Percent of compensationorders issued within 30 days

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 70 75 75


Goal 5. Ensure that the Department’s employ-ment and training policy supports the city’s eco-nomic development goals.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Promoting eco-

nomic developmentManager: Keith Cross, Deputy Director

OperationsSupervisor: Gregory Irish, Director

Performance Measure 5.1: Number of job placementsin e-commerce, telecommunications and technologyoccupations

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 200 300 400


Performance Measure 5.2: Number of residents placedin jobs located in suburban Washington, DC

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 500 500 500



B-30

Performance Measure 5.3: Number of residents placedas a result of First Source Agreements

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200

Actual N/A 1,940 - - -

Goal 6. Ensure that the Department’s programsmaintain consistent improvements in servicedelivery.Citywide Strategic Priority Area: Making govern-

ment workManager: Roberta Bauer, Associate Director

Compliance and Independent Monitoring;Diana Johnson, Associate Director, PublicAffairs/Staff Development

Supervisor: Gregory Irish, Director

Performance Measure 6.1: Number of major programsfor which compliance reviews are conducted

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A 5 5 5


Performance Measure 6.2: Total number of hours ofstaff training/ development

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A 1,000 1,700 1,700 1,700

Actual N/A 1,700 - - -

(DK0)

Board of Appeals and ReviewFY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget: $242,289FY 2002 Proposed Capital Budget: $0

The Board of Appeals and Review hears citizen complaintsabout adverse decisions on license revocations and civil infrac-tions from the Department of Consumer and RegulatoryAffairs; litter control violations from the Department ofPublic Works; certificates of need, program reimbursements,and providers agreements from the Department of Health;and denials of security guard and private detective agencylicenses from the Metropolitan Police Department.

• Enhance the agency Web site to increase com-munications with the public

Agency BackgroundThe board was established in 1954 by order of thecommissioner to hear citizen complaints aboutlicense revocations and infractions of agency rules.

ProgramsFigure DK0-1 shows the entities that make up theBoard of Appeals and Review. The board reviewsagency decisions when error is alleged; it can sus-tain, reverse, or modify the original decision or canremand the case for further consideration.

Decisions are based on testimony and docu-ments introduced at hearings. BAR is responsiblefor timely processing of cases including coordina-tion with other government agencies, attorneys,and pro se litigants. The FY 2002 funding level

Budget SummaryThe FY 2002 proposed operating budget for theBoard of Appeals and Review (BAR) is $242,289, anet decrease of $2,023, or less than 1 percent, fromthe FY 2001 approved budget (table DK0-1).Thisbudget supports 3 full-time equivalents (FTEs),which is unchanged from FY 2001 (table DK0-2).

Strategic IssueIn FY 2002, the board is committed to timely pro-cessing of its increasing caseload associated withdecisions on license revocations and civil infractions.

FY 2002 InitiativesThe board has set the following priorities for thecoming year:• Schedule all appeals and render decisions

within 30 days of filing and issuance of thehearing transcript

The FY 2002proposed operating budgetis $242,289, adecrease of$2,023, or lessthan 1 percent,from the FY 2001approved budget.

Board of Appeals and Review

B-31


B-32

provides for an executive officer and two otherfull-time positions. The 16-member board consistsof D.C. residents appointed for a specified term bythe Mayor and confirmed by the Council.

Funding Summary The funding level reflects an increase of $9,872 inpersonal services to align the personal servicesbudget with the current staffing level based on FY2002 requirements. Refer to the FY 2002Operating Appendices (bound separately) fordetails. The net decrease of $11,895 in nonper-sonal services includes:• an increase of $17,701 in fixed costs.• a net decrease of $29,596 in other services and

equipment purchases based primarily on costsaving initiatives implemented in FY 2001.

BAR is funded entirely from local sources. The FY2002 funding level is a decrease of $2,023 from theFY 2001 approved budget.

Trend DataTable DK0-3 shows expenditure history for FY1998–FY 2002.

Agency Goals andPerformance MeasuresGoal 1. Improve code enforcement and adjudi-cation.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Making govern-

ment workManager: Francine Howard James, DirectorSupervisor: Anthony A. Williams, Mayor

Measure 1.1. Number of appeals filed

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 99 99 108 100 120

Actual 70 190 39 - - Note: FY 2001 actual figure is a year-to-date figure throughJanuary 24, 2001.Measure 1.2: Number of appeal decisions issued

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 80 75 82 100 90

Actual 80 91 66 - - Note: FY 2001 actual figure is a year-to-date figure throughJanuary 24, 2001.

Measure 1.3: Percentage of appeals scheduled forhearing 30 days after filing

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 95 98 95 95 95


Measure 1.4: Percentage of appeal decisions issued 30days after hearing transcript

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target 95 98 95 95 95


Figure DK0-1Board of Appeals and Review

StaffAssistant

ParalegalSpecialist

ExecutiveOfficer


B-33

Table DK0-2FY 2002 Full-Time Equivalent Employment Levels




Total FTEs 3 3 3 0

Table DK0-1FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Comptroller Source Group(dollars in thousands)



Regular Pay - Cont Full Time 118 122 128 6



Subtotal Personal Services (PS) 135 142 152 10


Utilities 13 7 7 0


Rent - Land and Structures 0 0 7 7



Other Services and Charges 36 23 11 -12

Contractual Services 18 32 29 -3

Equipment and Equipment Rental 28 25 10 -15

Subtotal Nonpersonal Services (NPS) 104 102 90 (12)

Total Proposed Operating Budget 240 244 242 (2)

Table DK0-3FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Revenue Type(dollars in thousands)



Local 159 231 240 244 242

Gross Funds 159 231 240 244 242


B-34

(DA0)

Board of Real PropertyAssessments and Appeals FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget: $297,631FY 2002 Proposed Capital Budget: $0

The Board of Real Property Assessments and Appealsensures that properties in the District of Columbia areassessed at 100 percent of their estimated market value andequal to properties similar in size and utility that share thesame tax burden.

• Improve the BRPAA recording system toincrease the quality and accuracy of officialrecordings.

Agency BackgroundBRPAA’s legal authority was established under theDistrict of Columbia Real Property Tax RevisionAct of 1974, section 426a, D.C. Code 47.825.1,D.C. Administrative Procedure Act, and D.C.Municipal Regulation, Title 9, section 2000.

Programs Figure DA0-1 displays the makeup of BRPAA.The agency ensures that the Mayor and theDistrict Council have a real property tax base thatreflects 100 percent of each property’s market valuethat comes before the Board on appeal.

It reviews real property assessment appealsfiled by property owners and/or their representa-tives and conducts hearings with the propertyowners and/or representatives from the Office ofTax and Revenue. Such appeals are made in accor-dance with the provisions established in Section426a of the District of Columbia Real Property

Budget SummaryThe FY 2002 proposed operating budget for theBoard of Real Property Assessments and Appeals(BRPAA) is $297,631, a decrease of $2,467, or lessthan 1 percent, from the FY 2001 approved bud-get (table DA0-1). The FY 2002 budget includes adecrease of $525 in fixed costs for managementreform savings. The Board is funded 100 percentfrom local sources. There are 3 full-time equivalent(FTE) positions supported by this budget, thesame level as FY 2001 (table DA0-2).

Strategic IssueBRPAA will revise rules and regulations to ensurethat the assessment appeals process is equitableand customer friendly. The Board will also contin-ue to uphold its commitment to maintain opencommunications with the public.

FY 2002 Initiatives• Upgrade the BRPAA Web site to enable citi-

zens to file real property assessment appealsonline and send e-mails to the agency.

• Enhance the BRPAA newsletter.

The FY 2002proposed operat-ing budget is$297,631, adecrease of$2,467, or lessthan 1 percent,from the FY 2001approved budget.

Board of Real Property Assessments and Appeals

B-35


B-36

Tax Revision Act of 1974, approved September 3,1974 (88 stat. 1055), and D.C. Code 47-825.1,revised March 1993, D.C. AdministrativeProcedure Act and D.C. Municipal RegulationsTitle 9, Section 2000. The FY 2002 proposedfunding level supports 3 FTEs: an Administrativeofficer, a staff assistant, and a clerical assistant.These positions are overseen by an 18-memberBoard made up of D.C. residents, who areappointed for a specific term by the Mayor andconfirmed by the District Council.

Funding Summary LocalThe proposed local budget is $297,631, a decreaseof $2,467, or less than 1 percent, from FY 2001.There are 3 FTEs supported by this budget, thesame as in FY 2001. Refer to the FY 2002Operating Appendices (bound separately) fordetails. The changes in local funds consist of:• $8,680 increase for conversion to the

Management Supervisory Services (MSS) pay scale.

• $8,016 increase to align the personal servicesbudget with the current staff on board.

• $12,208 net increase in utilities, telecommuni-cations and rent.

• $19,065 decrease in other services and chargesdue to an anticipated decrease in the amount ofcompensation required for the board membersbased on prior year actuals.

• $12,306 decrease in equipment due to a reducedneed for equipment purchases in FY 2002.

Trend DataTable DA0-3 shows expenditure history for FY 1998–Proposed FY 2002.

Agency Goals and Performance Measures

Goal 1. Conduct fair and impartial hearings toensure property assessment values reflect 100percent of fair market values.Citywide Strategic Priority Areas: Building and sus-

taining healthy neighborhoods; Promoting eco-nomic development; Making government work

Manager: Norma J. Martin, ChairmanSupervisor: Doretha C. McCallum, Administrative

Officer

Measure 1.1: Number of decisions rendered aboutproperty values

Fiscal Year1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Target N/A N/A N/A 2000 3000

Actual 547 946 190 - -

Figure DA0-1Board of Real Property Assessments and Appeals

StaffAssistant

AdministrativeOfficer

Clerical Assistant

Board Members


B-37

Table DA0-2FY 2002 Full-Time Equivalent Employment Levels




Total FTEs 3 3 3 0

Table DA0-1FY 2002 Proposed Operating Budget, by Comptroller Source Group(dollars in thousands)



Regular Pay - Cont. Full Time 111 117 130 13



Subtotal Personal Services (PS) 129 135 152 17


Utilities 10 9 9 0


Rentals - Land and Structures 0 0 10 10



Other Services and Charges 85 12

economic development and regulationapp.cfo.dc.gov/budget/2002/pdf/pbfp_266.pdfsubtotal nonpersonal...

Documents