economic systems ways that societies answer what to produce, how to produce, and for whom to produce
TRANSCRIPT
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
Ways that societies answer WHAT to produce, HOW to
produce, and FOR WHOM to produce.
THREE KEY SYSTEMS
Traditional economy
Command economy
Market economy
Each system provides the guidelines for
answering the three basic economic questions
considering availability of resources.
TRADITIONAL ECONOMY
Why is June a popular month for weddings?
Why are men wearing hats indoors considered to
be impolite?
In a traditional economy, habit and custom dictate
answers for production within a community.
The Inuit of Alaska and Northern Canada, or Amish
communities in various areas still provide examples
of traditional economies today.
TRADITIONAL ECONOMY
What is produced? • Continue to hunt, farm, and produce same products/services
that have been produced for generations. Inuit hunt, Amish farm and produce furniture and other goods.
How is it produced?• Amish reject modern technologies. Children fall into same
occupations as parents.
For whom is it produced?• Largely produced for community, but some goods produced
for trade or sale with others to meet needs that may not be met on own.
TRADITIONAL ECONOMY
Advantages:• Everyone knows role• Little uncertainty of WHAT to produce• Little uncertainty of HOW to produce- no new
technologies to learn (next year’s system)
Disadvantages:• New ideas discouraged• Strict roles effectively punish those who act
differently or break rules• Lack of progress leads to lower standard of living
COMMAND ECONOMY
Exists when a central authority makes most of the
decisions of WHAT, HOW, and FOR WHOM to produce.
(Stalin’s 5-year plans; Mao’s land reform policies)
The two most prominent examples of a command economy
today is North Korea and Cuba.
Russian and China maintained command economies for
most of the 20th century, but both have transitioned toward
market economies.
COMMAND ECONOMY
Advantages:• Direction of the economy can change drastically in a short
amount of time.• Many health and public services are available to the populace
for little or no cost.
Disadvantages:• Not designed to meet the wants and needs of consumers.• Does not give incentive to work (Academic tests)• Requires large decision making bureaucracy• Does not have the flexibility to handle minor day-to-day
problems.• People with unique skills or ideas are often unused.
MARKET ECONOMY
Consumers essentially decide WHAT and FOR WHOM
questions because their decisions act as votes.
Entreprenuers then will largely decide HOW items
will be produced in as efficient manner as possible in
order to increase profit margins.
Examples include the United States, Canada, Mexico,
Japan, South Korea, Germany, France and Great Britain
MARKET ECONOMY
Advantages:• Can adjust to change over time (cars produced during gas
crisis; vhs/dvd)• High degree of individual freedom (product/service;
occupation)• Relatively small degree of government interference
(laissez-faire)• Decision making is de-centralized, not in the hands of the
few• Variety of goods and services available• High degree of consumer satisfaction (what if customers
complaints are not remedied?)
MARKET ECONOMY
Disadvantages:• Does not provide the basic needs for entire population
(unemployment numbers)• Does not provide enough of highly valued services (health,
education), focused on items to be sold• High degree of uncertainty for workers and business in
times of change• Markets can fail if three conditions not met: 1) reasonable
competition; 2) resources must remain free to be moved from one activity to another; 3) consumers need access to adequate information for choices (when markets fail, businesses become too large, and some individuals receive incomes not reflective of productivity
ECONOMIC SPECTRUM
COMMON USES
Command Economy =
Communism
Mixed Economy = Socialism
Market Economy = Capitalism