economics 1 2011-12

51
Economics 1 (EC107) 2011-12: Micro (Term 1) Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick 1 Economics 1 2011-12 (Lecture 1) Welcome!

Upload: daquan-banks

Post on 02-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Economics 1 2011-12. (Lecture 1) Welcome!. Economics 1. Accompanying Resources Module Website (with links) MyEconomics Portal Module Manual (with reading list) Seminar Work and Problem Sets Departmental Handbooks and Web-Sites. Economics 1. Organisation Lecture timetable - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Economics 1 2011-12

Economics 1 (EC107) 2011-12: Micro (Term 1)

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

1

Economics 12011-12

(Lecture 1)

Welcome!

Page 2: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

2

Economics 1

Accompanying Resources

• Module Website – (with links)

• MyEconomics Portal

• Module Manual– (with reading list)

• Seminar Work and Problem Sets

•Departmental Handbooks and Web-Sites

Page 3: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

3

Economics 1

Organisation

• Lecture timetable

• Seminar arrangements

• Personal Essays

• Examination and Assessment

Page 4: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

4

Economics 1

• Term 1 Microeconomics

• Term 2 Macroeconomics

Page 5: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

5

Economics

Readings (Micro)

• Frank, R., Microeconomics and Behaviour, 8th Edition, 2010,

McGraw- Hill

• Estrin, Laidler and Dietrich (ELD), Microeconomics, 2008

+ Many other textbooks plus other literature: see Module Manual

Page 6: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

6

Term 1: Micro Topics

• Introduction Scarcity and Trade

• Topic 1 Household behaviour

• Topic 2 Firm behaviour

• Topic 3 Product markets

• Topic 4 Factor markets

• Topic 5 Market Structure, Efficiency and Failure

Page 7: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

7

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

– Cause: excess of wants over ‘natural’ supply– Consequences:

(i) Choices over production

(ii) Trade-offs and opportunity costs

(iii) Rationing of distribution (Markets etc . . .)

Consider a 2-good economy:

Page 8: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

8

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max The Production Possibility Curve

The Production Possibility Set

See Handout

Page 9: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

9

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta MaxOn what does the position of the Production Possibility Curve depend?

Page 10: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

10

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

What can you say about point ‘a’?

Page 11: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

11

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

‘a’ is not ‘technically’ efficient. A ‘Pareto’ improvement can be made.

Page 12: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

12

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

What can you say about point ‘b’?. b

Page 13: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

13

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

There can be no Pareto Improvement from ‘b’. It is Pareto Efficient.

. b

Page 14: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

14

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

What can you say about point ‘c’?. b

. c

Page 15: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

15

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

How could we get to point ‘c’?. b

. c

Page 16: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

16

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

If we are at ‘a’, how can we have more Tractors?. b

See Handout

Page 17: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

17

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

If we are at ‘b’, how can we have more Tractors?. b

See Handout

Page 18: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

18

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

If we are at ‘b’, how can we have more Tractors?. b

. d

Page 19: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

19

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

We have shown a PPC which is concave: what does this depend on?

. b

. d

See Handout

Page 20: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

20

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

The slope of the PPC is called the Marginal Rate of Transformation (MRT).

Why?. b

. d

Page 21: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

21

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

The MRT is the amount of one good (Ta) we have to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good (Tr).

. b

. d

Page 22: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

22

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

The MRT is the amount of one good (Ta) we have to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good (Tr).

. b

. d

So the MRT is increasing in the case of the concave PPC. Why?

Page 23: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

23

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

The MRT is the amount of one good (Ta) we have to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good (Tr).

. b

. d

So the PPC and the MRT describe the Trade-off we have to make between the 2 goods.

Page 24: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

24

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

The MRT is the amount of one good (Ta) we have to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good (Tr).

. b

. d

So the PPC and the MRT describe the Opportunity Cost of the extra Tr.

Page 25: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

25

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

The PPC shows us the trade-off that Society has to make between 2 goods. But what about the trade-off that the Society is prepared to make?

See Handout

Page 26: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

26

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

What about the trade-off that the Society is prepared to make?

This is shown by an Indifference Curve.

IC

See Handout

Page 27: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

27

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

What about the trade-off that the Society is prepared to make?

This is shown by an Indifference Curve.

IC

Page 28: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

28

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

An Indifference Curve.

It’s slope shows us how much of one good the society is prepared to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good.

IC

Page 29: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

29

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

The slope of the IC shows us how much of one good the society is prepared to give up in order to have an extra unit of the other good:

This is the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS).

IC

Page 30: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

30

Introduction (Lecture 2)

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

The Marginal Rate of Substitution describes the trade-off society is prepared to make.

Why might it be convex, as shown?

IC

Page 31: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

31

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

Why might the PPC be convex, as shown?

IC

Page 32: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

32

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

A set or family of Indifference Curves

IC1

IC2

IC3

See Handout

Page 33: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

33

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

‘a’ is not technically efficient.

‘b’ is.

So is ‘d’. So how can we choose between ‘b’ and ‘d’?

They are both ‘technically’ efficient.

But they are not both Allocatively Efficient . . .

. b

. d

See Handout

Page 34: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

34

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

. b

. d

On which IC would society like most to be?

See Handout

Page 35: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

35

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

. b

. d

On which IC would society like most to be?

At what point is this?

Page 36: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

36

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

. b

. d

On which IC would society like most to be?

At what point is this?

. e

Page 37: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

37

Introduction

• The fundamental problem of scarcity

Tractors

Tanks

0 Tr Max

Ta Max

. a

. b

. d

At ‘e’, MRS = MRT.

Discuss.

. e

Page 38: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

38

Introduction

Gains from Trade• Consider now 2 economies, Red and Blue:

• Let’s assume they have the same inputs.

X

Y

PPC-R

PPC-B

See Handout

Page 39: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

39

Introduction

Gains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

PPC-R

PPC-B

Who has an absolute advantage in producing X?

And Y?

See Handout

Page 40: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

40

Introduction

Gains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

PPC-R

PPC-B

The fact that PPC-B is flatter than PPC-R has an important implication.

To raise output of X by the amount dX, the required reduction in Y is smaller in Blue than in Red.

dX

dX

See Handout

Page 41: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

41

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

To raise output of X by the amount dX, the required reduction in Y is smaller in Blue than in Red.

In other words, the Opportunity Cost of the extra X is lower in Blue than in Red.

We say that Blue has a Comparative Advantage in the production of X.

And Red has a Comparative Advantage in producing Y.

dX

dX

Page 42: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

42

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

Blue has a Comparative Advantage in the production of X.

And Red has a Comparative Advantage in producing Y.

This follows entirely from the relative slopes of the 2 PPCs. The MRT (i.e., the slope of the PPC) is greater in Red than in Blue. Thus, Blue has the Comparative Advantage in X.

Page 43: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

43

Introduction

Gains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

PPC-R

PPC-B

As a numerical example, let’s say that to raise output of X by the amount dX, the required reduction in Y is 1 unit in Blue and is 3 units in Red.

dX

dXdY=1

dY=3

See Handout

Page 44: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

44

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

Suppose that to raise output of X by the amount dX, the required reduction in Y is 1 unit in Blue and is 3 units in Red.

Then this has an implication for Trade and Specialisation.

Suppose initially, Blue is at point ‘a-B’ and Red is at ‘a-R’.

(Why might this be?)

dX

dXdY=1

dY=3

a-B

a-R

Page 45: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

45

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

Suppose initially, Blue is at point ‘a-B’ and Red is at ‘a-R’.

Why might this be?

a-B

a-R

Page 46: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

46

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

Suppose initially, Blue is at point ‘a-B’ and Red is at ‘a-R’.

If Blue gives up one unit of Y, it raises output of X by dX.

Suppose that at the same time Red cuts production of X by the same amount, dX: then it can raise output of Y by 3 units.

So what is the total change in ‘World’ production of X?

And of Y?

dX

dXdY=1

dY=3

a-B

a-R

Page 47: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

47

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

So with an unchanged total production of X and a higher total production of Y, the countries could*:

Trade such that Blue exports dX to Red and, in return, Red exports 2 units of Y to Blue.

What would this look like in terms of each country’s PPC?

a-B

a-R

* They ‘could’ trade in the manner we have suggested. In general, how much they trade of each good will depend on . . . ?

b-R

b-BdY=1

dY=1

See Handout

Page 48: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

48

IntroductionGains from Trade• Consider 2 economies, Red and Blue:

X

Y

So, the countries could trade such that Blue exports X to Red and, in return, Red exports Y to Blue.

Where does this argument lead?

What can you say about the extent of specialisation in this case?

On what assumptions does this result depend?

What change in assumptions might modify this result?

b-R

b-B

See Handout

Page 49: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

49

Introduction

Key Concepts

• Scarcity• Wants• Opportunity Cost• Trade-offs• Rationing• Markets• Efficiency• Equity• Constraints• Changes at the margin

See Handout

Page 50: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

50

Introduction

Key Concepts

• Choices• Preferences• Constraints• PPC• MRS• MRT• Optimisation• Absolute advantage• Comparative advantage• Specialisation• Trade

See Handout

Page 51: Economics 1 2011-12

Robin Naylor, Department of Economics, Warwick

51

Introduction

Self-study Questions

• Show and explain a PPC for a country

• What determines the position and shape of the PPC

• Explain the concept of the MRT

• Economists often argue that Choices depend on two key concepts: Preferences and Constraints. Explain this argument.

• Explain the concept of the MRS

• Define ‘trade-offs’ (in terms of both preferences and constraints) and ‘Opportunity Cost’ and explain their meanings in a diagram using the concept of the PPC.

• What is meant by Absolute Advantage?

• What is meant by Comparative Advantage? Explain how the concepts of comparative advantage and of opportunity cost are related.

• Show how trade and specialisation can lead to potential gains for both parties in a trade.

See Handout