economics and finance for engineers february 6, 2009 presented by: william h. mclean, v.p. & cio...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
212 views
TRANSCRIPT
ECONOMICS AND FINANCE
FOR ENGINEERS
February 6, 2009
Presented by:
William H. McLean, V.P. & CIO
Northwestern University
Investments 2
Agenda
Understanding the Endowment
Asset Allocation
Active Strategies
Hedge Funds
Private Investments
Investments 3
Management Structure
• Strategic Direction of Portfolio• Review Asset Allocation • Investment Policy• Oversight of manager hiring/firing
• Strategic and tactical issues for the portfolio
• Due Diligence process/manager selection
• Portfolio monitoring
Responsibility
Investment Committee
Investment Office
W. McLean, VP & CIO
Public AR PI Oper.
Investments 4
Long-Term Endowment Fund Spending RuleMarket Element = 30% weight(Average market value for last 12 months times
long-term target spending or 4.35%)
Spending Element = 70% weight
(Actual CPI + 1.51%)
Total $ (Millions)
$ Per Unit
% Change
% Year-end Market Value
1996 $55.2 3.62 + 3.1% 3.59%
1997 $60.4 3.73 + 3.0% 3.08%
1998 $70.3 4.17 +11.8% 3.53%
1999 $73.2 4.27 + 2.4% 3.01%
2000 $95.5 5.30 +24.1% 2.92%
2001 $117.2 6.22 +17.4% 3.93%
2002 $130.2 6.56 + 5.5% 4.67%
2003 $150.7 6.90 + 5.2% 4.77%
2004 $160.4 6.87 - 0.4% 4.37%
2005 $161.4 6.75 - 1.7% 3.75%
2006 $176.2 6.81 + 0.9% 3.39%
2007 $197.5 7.22 + 6.0% 3.10%
2008 $233.5 7.80 + 8.0% 3.36%
2009 $269.8 e 8.54 + 9.5% 4.57% e
Investments 5
Investment Objective
“Preserve purchasing power of Investments and provide a growing stream of Income for the University’s programs.”
or
Annual Total Return Spending + Inflation>=
Investments 6
Investment ObjectiveAnnual Total Return Spending + Inflation>
=As of December 31, 2008
1-year 3-year 5-year 10-year 15-year
Annual Total Return -21.2% 2.9% 7.9% 8.0% 9.5%
- Spending 4.1% 3.6% 3.7% 3.9% 3.8%
- Inflation -0.4% 2.0% 2.7% 2.5% 2.4%
= Above objective -24.91% -2.68% 1.55% 1.59% 3.31%
Investments 7
Endowment Growth (Through August 31, 2008)
Beginning Endowment Value (1992)
$956
Net Additions
$3,015
Appreciation$4,821
Spending-$1,850
Ending Endowment
ValueAugust, 2008
$6,942
Investments 8
Endowment Assets ($ in billions)
Source: Cambridge Associates
#10
Harvard University 43.9
Yale University 22.8
Stanford University 18.6
Princeton University 14.9
MIT Inv. Mgmt Company 10.3
DUMAC, LLC 7.4
University of Michigan 7.2
University of Notre Dame 7.1
Columbia University 6.7
Northwestern University 6.6
Cornell University 6.3
University of Chicago 6.0
University of Texas System 5.8
University of California 5.7
University of Pennsylvania 5.6
Emory University 5.0
Washington University (St. Louis) 4.7
University of Virginia Inv. Mgmt Co. 4.7
Rice University 4.1
Vanderbilt University 3.4
Dartmouth College 3.3
University of Southern California 3.0
Brown University 2.9
Johns Hopkins University 2.8
New York University 2.4
UNC Management Company Inc. 2.2
University of Pittsburgh 2.1
University of Washington 1.9
Ohio State University 1.8
University of Toronto 1.7
Investments 9
Agenda
Understanding the Endowment
Asset Allocation
Active Strategies
Hedge Funds
Private Investments
Investments 10
Long-Term Asset Allocation Process
• Establish risk and return expectations
• Establish constraints
• Propose target portfolio and ranges
• Compare target to peers
• Approval of new target and ranges
• Review of new asset class benchmarks
Investments 11
Conventional Asset Return/Risk Perspective
Investments 12
The Holy Grail of Investing:15 or more Good, Uncorrelated Return Streams
Investments 13
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00%
Expected Risk
Private Equity
Market Hedged
Real Assets
Intl Equity
US Equity
Fixed Income
Current Holdings
Ex
pe
cte
d R
etu
rn
Unconstrained Frontier
Constrained Frontier
Asset allocation using purely quantitativemean-variance framework
Investments 14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Ass
et A
lloca
tion
(%)
19.5 Global ex U.S. Equity
13.5 U.S. Equity
27.3 Marketable Alt.
9.4 Total Bonds
22.3 Non-Marketable Alt.
7.8 Equity Real Estate
0.2 Cash
Asset Allocation (%) Trends
June 30, 1988 – June 30, 2008
Source: Cambridge Associates
0.72.92.93.7
11.0
33.4
45.3
Investments 15
Asset Allocation gets more difficult when dealing with multiple alternative asset classes
• Private Equity (Buyouts and Venture Capital)
– Illiquid assets not marked-to-market
– Long term (7+ years) investment horizon different than that of publicly traded securities
– Separate asset class, but with “beta” to market
– Volatility does not capture true risk
• Hedge Funds
– Artificially created asset class; collection of investment strategies that cover the breadth of asset classes
– Distribution of returns NOT normally distributed
Investments 16
NU Asset Allocation
Preliminary As of December 31, 2008
Actual Target Low Range High Range
US Equity 10.5% 14% 11% 17%
International Equity 12.5% 16% 13% 19%
Fixed Income 10.4% 10% 7% 13%
High Yield Credit 7.9% 5% 2% 8%
Absolute Return 15.9% 18% 14% 22%
Private Investments 24.9% 20% 16% 24%
Real Assets 18.7% 17% 13% 21%
Cash -0.7% 0%
Investments 17
Total Endowment Performance
Preliminary as of December 31, 2008
-9.8%
-21.0%
3.0%
8.0%
-10.3%
-20.2%
1.5%
5.5%
3 Months 12 Months 3 Years 5 Years
Northwestern Benchmark
Investments 18
NU vs. Cambridge Associates’ Colleges and Universities(September 30, 2008)
NU -11.2 7.9 12.0
Investments 19
University Peer Returns (As of June 30, 2008)1 Year 3 Year 5 Year
Yale University 19.14
University of Notre Dame 17.83
Harvard Mgmt Co. 17.61
University of Michigan 17.45
DUMAC, LLC 17.44
Stanford University 17.18
MIT Inv. Mgmt Co. 16.57
Princeton University 16.54
Northwestern University 15.76
University of Chicago 15.55
Columbia University 15.38
Cornell University 14.66
Univ of Virginia Inv Mgm Co. 14.37
Dartmouth College 14.28
Vanderbilt University 14.27
Rice University 13.65
Univ. of Southern California 13.28
University of Texas System 13.20
Washington Univ.-St. Louis 11.78
Emory University 10.87
University of California 10.68
University of Pennsylvania 10.46
Harvard Mgmt Co. 8.64
University of Michigan 6.38
Stanford University 6.23
DUMAC, LLC 6.15
Univ of Virginia Inv Mgm Co. 5.93
University of Notre Dame 5.77
Princeton University 5.58
Yale University 4.50
University of Chicago 3.62
MIT Inv. Mgmt Co. 3.18
Northwestern University 2.90
Cornell University 2.72
University of Texas System 2.35
Rice University 2.16
Vanderbilt University 2.14
Columbia University 2.00
Dartmouth College 0.48
Emory University -0.43
Univ. of Southern California -1.23
Washington Univ.-St. Louis -1.36
University of California -1.93
University of Pennsylvania -3.92
Yale University 18.02
DUMAC, LLC 17.01
University of Notre Dame 16.71
Princeton University 16.30
Stanford University 16.12
Harvard Mgmt Co. 15.96
University of Michigan 15.82
MIT Inv. Mgmt Co. 15.72
Univ of Virginia Inv Mgm Co. 14.97
Northwestern University 14.82
Cornell University 14.53
University of Chicago 14.35
Columbia University 14.12
Dartmouth College 12.79
Rice University 12.51
Vanderbilt University 12.25
Emory University 11.02
University of Texas System 10.94
Univ. of Southern California 10.65
Washington Univ.-St. Louis 10.24
University of California 9.52
University of Pennsylvania 9.10
Source: Cambridge Associates
Investments 20
Agenda
Understanding the Endowment
Asset Allocation
Active Strategies
Hedge Funds
Private Investments
Investments 22
Beta is pretty simple. What about “alpha”?
Right now, alpha comes from 3 places:
Alpha production on top of benchmark
Benchmark Return
Alpha of strategy
Residual beta of strategy (may be zero)
2) “Pure Alpha” sources: Hedge Funds
• The product is the alpha, with our without some residual market beta
Alpha and Beta are integrated in strategy
3) “Embedded Alpha” Sources: Private Investments• The alpha is inseparable from the beta, but dispersion
of returns among managers suggests that alpha exists and can be large
1) Traditional sources: Active Managers• Alpha is integrated into the product, but is
easily identifiable
Investments 23
Agenda
Understanding the Endowment
Asset Allocation
Active Strategies
Hedge Funds
Private Investments
Investments 25
Allocation to Alternatives
Investments 26
Hedge Funds are characterized by non-normal distributions of returns
Distribution of Returns - Hedge Funds vs. Stocks and BondsMonthly returns, May 1994-October 2003
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
-10% -9
%-8
%-7
%-6
%-5
%-4
%-3
%-2
%-1
% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
Mor
e
Monthly Return (%)
# o
f O
bse
rvat
ion
s
Hedge Fund Returns(NU net returns)
Stock Returns(S&P500)
Bond Returns(Lehman Aggregate)
Hedge Fund Returns: positively skewed, lower risk than stocks
Stock Returns: very risky, negatively skewed, in other words there is significant negative tail risk
Bond Returns: not very risky, and are slightly negatively skewed
Investments 27
Five Broad Hedge Fund Categories Encapsulate Many Distinct Strategies
L-S (Jones Model)L-S (Mkt Neutral)L-S (Short Bias)
Deep Value / CatalystCap Str Arb / DistressDistressed Active
Interest Rate Value Commod. Value Macro
Merger ArbStat Arb / Prs TradingEquity Deriv. Arb
Convertible Arb Fixed Income ArbMortgage Arb
Commodity Arb Multi-Strategy*
EQUITYCAPITAL
STRUCTURE / CREDIT
INTEREST RATES
COMMODITY MULTIPLE
VALUE
ARB
INSTRUMENT
ST
YL
E
*Note: Multi-Strategy managers implement subset of all other strategies across the broad categories (indicated by different colors), and allocate risk to the strategies in a proprietary manner.
LONG-SHORT EQUITY1
2 4
3
5
LONG-SHORT CAP STRUCTURE
RELATIVE VALUE STRATEGIES
GLOBAL VALUE
MULTI-STRATEGY*
Investments 28
Hedge Fund Risk Management
• Understand the strategies
• Understand the correlation among strategies
• Understand opportunity set of each strategy
• Set allocation to strategies appropriately
• Find the best managers to execute strategies, with strong emphasis on trust and integrity
Investments 29
Non Market Risks Associated with Hedge Funds
Large Variation Across Strategy• Limited History of Operations• Leverage• Tail Risk & Correlation Convergence• Liquidity & Concentration of Portfolio• Style Drift• Short Volatility• Organization & Back Office• Fraud
Investments 30
Agenda
Understanding the Endowment
Asset Allocation
Active Strategies
Hedge Funds
Private Investments
Investments 31
Buyouts Fundraising
U.S. Buyouts and Mezzanine Fundraising
$28$47
$70$49
$94
$58$46
$33
$73
$169
$226
$282
$205
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 YTD3Q 08
$ R
aise
d (
bill
ion
s)
Source: Buyouts
Investments 32
Venture Capital Fundraising
Source: NVCA
Venture Capital Fundraising
$24
$11
$4
$19
$28
$32
$35
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 YTD 3Q08
$ in
bill
ions
100
150
200
250
Num
ber
of f
unds
Investments 33
Venture-backed Exits
Source: Venture Economics & NVCA
M&A
IPO0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
# o
f M
&A
Exi
ts
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
# o
f IP
Os
Investments 34
Trends in Private Investments
• FASB 157• Denominator Effect/Quest for Liquidity• Secondary Transactions (LP and GP)• Tough Fundraising Market• Emerging Markets• Longer Holding Period• Shake-out in the system? Is the model broken?• Increased # of Investors in the Market• Difficult to Access Top Tier Managers
Investments 35
Private Investments: Emergence of Mega Funds
Prior to 2004 2004 -2006
Funds > $3.5bn 9 19
Funds > $6.0bn 3 10
Funds > $10bn 0 5*
* Includes funds scheduled to close/closed in 2006. Apollo, KKR, Bain, TPG, Blackstone.
Source: Willis Stein Partners
Investments 36
Nine of the ten largest deals occurred in 2005/2006
Highlighted deals represent Northwestern’s Exposure
AcquisitionDate
AnnouncedDeal
($ Billions) PE FirmsHCA (US) Jul 2006 $31.6 Bain, KKR,Merrill
RJR Nabisco (US) Oct 1988 $30.6 KKR
Kinder Morgan (US) May 2006 $22.0 Goldman, Carlyle, Riverstone
Albertsons (US) Jan 2006 $17.4 Cerberus, Blackacre, Lubert-Adler
TDC (Denmark) Nov 2005 $15.3 Apax, Blackstone, Providence, KKR, Permira
Hertz (US) Sep 2005 $15.0 CD&R, Carlyle, Merrill
GMAC (US) Apr 2006 $14.0 Cerberus, Citigroup, Blackacre
Univision (US) Jun 2006 $12.3 MDP, Providence, TPG, TH Lee
Sungard (US) Mar 2005 $11.4 Bain, Blackstone, Goldman, KKR, Providence, TPG, Silver Lake
VNU (Denmark) Jan 2006 $11.0 KKR, TH Lee, Carlyle, Hellman & Friedman
Investments 37
GP Management Company Sales
• Retention tool or cashing out?
General Partners Amount AcquirorNatural Gas Partners 40% BarclaysAvenue Capital 20% Morgan StanleyFortress Investment Group 25% Nomura (15%); IPO (10%)Lansdowne 20% Morgan StanleyOspraie 20% Lehman BrothersSilverlake 9.9% CalpersBlackstone $3bn China
Investments 38
NU Alternatives Portfolio
• Investment program began in 1993• Four managers oversee the program• Currently represents 50% of the total endowment
– Includes hedge funds, buyout, venture capital partnerships, real estate, energy and a Co-investment program
• Mature portfolio but with opportunities to diversify• Long term investor mindset
Investments 39
NU Private Investments Portfolio
• Currently represents 20% of the total endowment– Includes buyout, venture capital partnerships, Co-
investment program
$ Millions # of Mgrs # of Funds Committed Called UncalledPE Domestic 26 58 $1,101 $843 $258Venture Capital - Domestic 33 83 $950 $640 $310PE International 16 27 $448 $254 $194Venture Capital - Intl 9 19 $167 $88 $79Coinvestments 16 NA $67 $42 $25Totals 100 187 $2,733 $1,867 $866
Investments 40
The Investment Process
1. Review Private Placement Memorandum and have initial meeting with GP
2. Follow-up meetings3. Due diligence4. Investment Memorandum5. Negotiation of terms 6. Receive Approval from Investment Committee/
Closing7. Monitor performance, build relationship
Investments 41
Due Diligence
1. Strategy
2. Management Team
3. Performance
4. Terms
Investments 42
Strategy
• Consistency across funds
• Differentiated in the marketplace
• Fund size supports strategy
• Deal sourcing ability
• Deal structuring– Purchase price multiple, leverage, management
ownership
• Ability to exit in various markets
Investments 43
Management Team
• Background
• Cohesion – Tenure of the team? Stable partnership?
• Carried Interest allocation within team
• Deal and board capacity
• Motivation of team
• Reference checks
Investments 44
Performance
• Realized deals– Source of realization: disposal, dividend, recap
– Dispersion of returns
• Unrealized deals– Current valuation method: 3rd party, EBITDA multiple at
purchase vs. market, public shares
• Deal attribution by partners• Source of value creation• Gross IRR/Multiples v. Net IRR/Multiples
Investments 45
Terms
• Management fee
• Carried interest
• GP commitment
• Key man provision
• Clawback (guarantee)
• No fault divorce clause
• Transaction fees, director fees offset
Questions