economie en anglais
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
1/11
Principles of EconomicsLevel: Master 1 CE/CI Semester 1
Language: EnglishAcademic Year: 2008-2009
Prof Gilles DUFRENOT
Faculty of Administration and International RelationshipsUniversity of Paris 12 Val de Marne
Lecture Notes
Chapter 1. Inflation
I.- Introduction : Basic concepts and common ideas about inflation
I.1.- Several concepts to illustrate the changes in a nominal price index
A rise the general level of prices in nominal terms (whosesale prices, wages, GDP
deflator, CPI)
Which indicator? Usually, the annualized percentage growth of the CPI or GDP
deflator index. Note: be sure that you know how to compute an annualized inflation
rate from monthly and quarterly data.
Several countries have experienced episodes of hyperinflation (CPI changes above
50% per month): Germany (30s), developing countries, Zimbabwe (1000% per day!)
Deflation : negative inflation (ex: Japan in recent years). Question: according to you,
what are the reasons for Japans deflationary trap since the 1970s?
Some elements of answers are:
- Japans increasing competitiveness and rising trade surpluses in the 1970s
- Pressure by the US government (threats of sanctions) to keep appreciating the
yen (explain why trade surplus leads to an upward movement of the nominal
exchange rate). Yen : 360 per Dollar in August 1971 to 80 yen per Dollar in
April 1995, late 1990s around 120 yen per Dollar.
-Consequences: a decrease in the price of tradable goods (imported prices).
1
-
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
2/11
- Fear of an overvaluation of the interest rate leads the monetary authorities to
reduce nominal interest rates thereby contributing to great bubbles in the
Japanese stocks. When the bubbles burst, this accentuated deflation.
Examples:
The inflation rate in France since the beginning century (see the graph)
- several price spikes appear corresponding to specific events : the two second
World wars show up, the prices display a peak around the years
corresponding to the oil shocks, since the beginning 90s CPI inflation has
remained steadily low (around 2%, up until the recent surge in the food and oil
price).
Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe (see graph)
I.2- Which indicator is best suited for the inflation rate ?
CPI : basket of goods and services consumed by households (staple foods, energy,
electricity, transport, etc.) -> an indication of the cost of living
GDP deflator:
- more representative of the economy as a whole (cost of factors),
- less relevant to ordinary consumers: basket includes the prices of
nonconsumer goods
- excludes the prices of the many foreign-produced goods that consumers do
buy.
prices of non-tradables and tradables
- definition : locally-produced goods and services (hair-dresser, public
transportation, housing prices, etc), goods and services that are traded and
whose prices are influenced by the world prices
-
this allows to distinguish between the supply-driven and demand driveninflation (productivity, level of income, government consumption, money, etc.).
2
http://c/cours/introductory%20economics/graph1901.gifhttp://var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/zimb_graphic.jpghttp://c/cours/introductory%20economics/graph1901.gifhttp://var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/zimb_graphic.jpg -
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
3/11
- Ex: a trend increase in the relative price of tradables signals that demand
factors are at play in driving relative price movements.
- The ratio of the prices of non-tradables to tradables is an indicator of a
countrys internal competitiveness (indicates whether there are some incitation
in shifting production towards domestically produced goods)
Examples :
Items of the CPI index (see graph)
CPI, tradable and non-tradable components (see graph)
Headline and core inflation
- For consumers : what matters is headline inflation (standard of living)
- Core inflation rate : useful for calibrating monetary policy, by excluding the
most volatile component of the price index (usually staple foods and energy).
I.3- What is meant by inflation is always and everywhere a monetary
phenomenon or money is neutral in the long-run?
The accounting identity that allows analyzing the link between money stock and
prices: M V = P Y (also called the quantitative equation).
What do we expect on a deductive basis?
- V : income velocity of money (number of times per year a euro is turned over
in transactions of the final goods); depends upon numerous factors
(preference for liquidity, banking depth, etc.).
- Y: transactions in real terms conditional on production capacities (productivity,
infrastructures, etc).
All things being equals, doubling M will double P. Say it another way: prices rise
when there are more money purchasing the same amount of production.
3
http://var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/cpi_decomp.gifhttp://var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/nz_inflation.gifhttp://var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/cpi_decomp.gifhttp://var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/nz_inflation.gif -
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
4/11
Money is injected in the economy in several manners by central banks, for example
through open markets operations (by purchasing bonds and the commercial bank
receives in turn money. Money is hold in the form of deposits and deposits loans).
The CBs action expands the loanable funds (by business firms and households).
The important point here is that we have no real price effects (in the sense that
some prices are raised in comparison to others). An increase in the stock of money
implies a proportional rise in all prices.
The economists say that money is neutral, meaning that an expansive monetary
policy has only nominal effects (no real effects). But this happens in the long-run,
when the relative price effects are washed out.
Question: Can you give me an, whereby a monetary expansion may imply real
effects?
-impact of loanable funds on the interest rates, then on the prices of bonds
(link the prices of bonds to the discounted values of expected profits) and this may
have detrimental effects on investment.
Use the quantity equation and explain the circumstances under which the inflation
dynamics is mainly linked to an increase in the quantity of money. To what extend
are we sure that these assumptions hold.
This is an empirical issue: which of the three factors contribute the most to inflation?
Friedman provides some evidence that, historically, a long lasting inflation has been
associated with a sustained growth of money supply.
According to you, describe different ways of proving empirically that money is a
monetary phenomenon:
4
-
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
5/11
- Compare inflation differentials (between countries or within a country over
different time periods) and the differentials of output growth and money
velocity growth.
Do you understand, now, why the monetarist approach is sometimes referred as a
demand-pull explanation of inflation?
Money expansion fuels spending and this in turn pulls prices up.
The quantity equation can also be used to account for the impact of negative supply
shocks on inflation, but the latter have to be very large.
a supply shock leads a rise in the general price level if the economys output
shrinks by a large amount (in the differential equation, gY must be strongly negative)
An example: the USA during the second oil price shocks:
9.2 percent U.S. inflation rate in 1980 (as measured by the GDP deflator, gP=
9.2 percent)
negative growth of real GDP (gy= 0.2%)
growth in the money stock (M1 measure, December 1980 over December 1979)
accounted for 7.0 percentage points (gM= 7.0 percent).
Growth of approximately 2 percent in the income-velocity of M1 accounted for
the remainder (gV= 2.0 percent).
Explain the following paradox, then. Assume that the economy is an overheating
situation (one observes a spurt in real growth) and that inflation is rising. How can the
monetary approach be evoked to explain this?
I.4- Is there a relationship between unemployment and inflation
5
-
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
6/11
The so-called Phillips curve describes an empirical link between the rate of inflation
and the unemployment rate.
first evidence: Phillipss UK 1861- 1957. Found a negative relationship between the
unemployment rate and the growth rate of nominal wages: low unemployment
implying a high increase in wages and conversely (wages are raised to attract a
scarce labor factor).
Our conjecture: wages are indexed to prices (wage-price loop) . The price you
charge is proportional to the wages you pay.
Figure 1 shows a Phillips curve drawn data on from the United States from 1961
to 1969. The cost of reducing unemployment would be higher: for instance, a
reduction in unemployment from 5 to 4 percent would imply an increase in the
inflation rate of about one and a quarter percentage points.
Figure 1 The Phillips Curve, 19611969
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Note: Inflation based on the Consumer Price Index.
Some authors in the economic literature have challenged the theoretical
underpinnings of the Phillips curve
First criticism concerns money illusion. Informed workers refer to the inflation
adjusted money wages (purchasing power). So, when employers want to attract
6
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PhillipsCurve.html#lfHendersonCEE2-126_figure_036http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/art/lfHendersonCEE2_figure_036.jpghttp://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PhillipsCurve.html#lfHendersonCEE2-126_figure_036 -
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
7/11
workers, money wages first increase, but since they are connected to the general
level of prices, the real wages are not affected, thereby implying that no movement
occurs in the labor supply.
So, there is a natural level of unemployment and no dilemma between inflation and
unemployment.
Friedman and the monetarists go a step further arguing that money is neutral with
no real prices effects (no changes in the real wages) and thus the equilibrium on the
labor and goods markets remained at its initial position.
Fiscal or monetary policy used to lower unemployment below its natural rate
demand is increased nominal prices are raised faster than nominal wages in the
short run, employers are victims of money illusion and firms expected higher profits
new workers are hired (the unemployment rate falls);
However, workers progressively adjust their expectations (by observing price
increases today, they anticipate future increases and then claim wages increases)
leading the unemployment rate to return to its previous level (since the real wages
have remain constant).
Main conclusion are :
- A distinction is worthwhile between short-run and long-run Phillips curve
swhen one assumes rational expectations
-According to the monetarists, the long-run Phillips curve is vertical (at a levelcorresponding to the natural rate of unemployment
- The only impact of expansionary fiscal and monetary policies is to expand
inflation with no implication on the long-run unemployment rate (NAIRU)
Figure 2 shows an example
According to the regression line, NAIRU (unemployment rate for which the changein the rate of inflation is zero) is about 6 percent. If the economy is at NAIRU , but
7
-
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
8/11
with an inflation rate that differs from zero, the government would like to reduce the
inflation rate to zero.
The figure suggests that contractionary monetary and fiscal policies that drove the
average rate of unemployment up to about 7 percent (i.e., one point above NAIRU)
would be associated with a reduction in inflation of about one percentage point per
year. Thus, if the governments policies caused the unemployment rate to stay at
about 7 percent, the 3 percent inflation rate would, on average, be reduced one point
each yearfalling to zero in about three years.
Figure 2 Example of an expectations-Augmented Phillips Curve
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Note: Inflation based on the Consumer Price Index.
Modern macroeconomic models often employ another version of the Phillips curve in
which the output gap replaces the unemployment rate as the measure of aggregate
demand relative to aggregate supply. The output gap is the difference between the
actual level of GDP and the potential (or sustainable) level of aggregate output
expressed as a percentage of potential. This formulation explains why, at the end of
the 1990s boom when unemployment rates were well below estimates of NAIRU,
prices did not accelerate. The reasoning is as follows. Potential output depends not
only on labor inputs, but also on plant and equipment and other capital inputs. At the
end of the boom, after nearly a decade of rapid INVESTMENT, firms found themselves
8
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Investment.htmlhttp://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Investment.html -
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
9/11
with too much capital. The excess capacity raised potential output, widening the
output gap and reducing the pressure on prices.
Many articles in the conservative business press criticize the Phillips curve because
they believe it both implies that growth causes inflation and repudiates the theory that
excess growth of money is inflations true cause. But it does no such thing. One can
believe in the Phillips curve and still understand that increased growth, all other
things equal, will reduce inflation. The misplaced criticism of the Phillips curve is
ironic since Milton Friedman, one of the coinventors of its expectations-augmented
version, is also the foremost defender of the view that inflation is always, and
everywhere, a monetary phenomenon.
The Phillips curve was hailed in the 1960s as providing an account of the inflation
process hitherto missing from the conventional macroeconomic model. After four
decades, the Phillips curve, as transformed by the natural-rate hypothesis into its
expectations-augmented version, remains the key to relating unemployment (of
capital as well as labor) to inflation in mainstream macroeconomic analysis.
9
-
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
10/11
APPENDIX 1
There is an inverse relationship between price and yield: when interest rates arerising, bond prices are falling, and vice versa.
The easiest way to understand this is to think logically about an investment. You buya bond for $100 that pays a certain interest rate (coupon). Interest rates (coupons) goup. That same bond, to pay then-current rates, would have to cost less: maybe youwould pay $90 the same bonds if rates go up.
Ignoring discount factors, here is a simplified example, a 1-year bond.
Let's say you bought a 1-year bond when the 1-year interest rate was 4.00%. Thebond's principal (amount you pay, and will receive back at maturity) is $100. Thecoupon (interest) you will receive is 4.00% * $100 = $4.00.
Today: You Pay $100.00
Year 1: You receive $4.00
Year 1 (Maturity): You Receive $100
Interest Rate = $4.00 / $100.00 = 4.00%
Now, today, assume the 1-year interest rate is 4.25%. Would you still pay $100 for abond that pays 4.00%? No. You could buy a new 1-year bond for $100 and get
4.25%.
So, to pay 4.25% on a bond that was originally issued with a 4.00% coupon, youwould need to pay less.
How much less?
Today: You Pay X
Year 1: You Receive $4.00
Year 1 (Maturity): You Receive $100
The interest you receive + the difference between the redemption price ($100) andthe initial price paid (X) should give you 4.25%:
[ ($100 - X) + $4.00 ] / X = 4.25%
$104 - X = 4.25% * X
$104 = 4.25% * X + X
$104 = X (4.25% + 1)
10
-
7/29/2019 Economie en Anglais
11/11
$104 / (1.0425) = X
X = $99.76
So, to get a 4.25% yield, you would pay $99.75 for a bond with a 4.00% coupon.
11