ectar · ecostar acknowledgements this document has been made possible through the generous support...
TRANSCRIPT
ECOSTAR
CEFR-Aligned Framework for English in Higher Education in Israel
English as the Cornerstoneof Sustainable Technology and Research
CEFR -Aligned Fr amewor k for English
in Higher Education in I sr ael
Co-funded by theTempus Programmeof the European Union
Yael Perets, NITE: graphic design and editing
Anat Samuel, PSDesign: cover image
2017
© Project number 543683-TEMPUS-1-2013-1-IL-TEMPUS-JPCR
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible
for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
ECOSTAR
Acknowledgements
This document has been made possible through the generous support of TEMPUS1 of the European Union and the productive cooperation amongst the ECOSTAR2 partners (see Figure 1).
)ע"ר( ולהערכה לבחינות ארצי מרכז NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TESTING & EVALUATION
والتّقييـم لالمتحــانات القـطــري املركــز
בישראל האוניברסיטאות של מיסודן
European Partners
Israeli Partners
ORT Braude College of Engineering (coordinator)
The Open University of Israel
MEITAL – The Inter-University Center for e-learning
The Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya
Sami Shamoon College of Engineering
The National Institute for Testing and Evaluation
University of Tel AvivThe Nazareth Academic Institute
The National Union of Israeli Students
The University of Leicester, UK
The University of Maastricht, the Netherlands
The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania
The University of Nicosia, Cyprus
Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland
L'Università degli Studi L'Aquila, Italy
Figure - 1 ECOSTAR partners
1 TEMPUS is the European Union’s program that supports the modernization of higher education and promotes institutional cooperation amongst partner countries in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Western Balkans and the Mediterranean region.
2 ECOSTAR - English as the Cornerstone of Sustainable Technology and Research - is a 15-partner consortium that connects experts in the field of language teaching, learning and assessment from several Israeli and EU institutions, in an effort to standardize the teaching of English in higher education in Israel.
1
ECOSTAR
Preface
The English language is a major vehicle for international communication in all spheres of life but has a particularly significant role in the academic world where scholars at all levels need to interact in a Language of Wider Communication (LWC). University students all over the world grapple with textbooks, articles and other academic and professional matter in English, not their first language, while promoting their own academic advancement. They are willing to invest time, money and special efforts, in order to become efficient users of English.
English language learners who aspire to become efficient users of English for a wide range of objectives, need to develop individual strategies to become autonomous learners. Knowing what the goals of learning English are, in general but also as defined for each stage in the process, is most helpful. The ‘can-do’ approach to defining goals, while it helps planners and policy makers to design materials and evaluation tools, can be most helpful for learners. They can evaluate their own progress and their proficiency at each stage. Thus, every learner can develop an ongoing monitoring of progress, and take responsibility for the learning of the language.
In the CEFR context, teaching, learning and assessment are closely connected. In the framework developed for EAP in Israel, the CEFR scale is made compatible with the current levels of proficiency used in academic institutions. This provides the English programs in these institutions with a tool of standardization that is transparent and well-defined yet leaves ample flexibility for each group of learners to adapt the elements to their specific needs. This is a very welcome approach to EAP in Israel and will most likely improve English proficiency significantly.
Elite Olshtain
Professor (Emeritus) of Language Education
The School of Education
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1st January 2017
2
ECOSTAR
CONTENTS
Introduction 3-6
Overview of the CEFR 7-11
Trom Besisi Aleph: Can-do statements 12-14
Trom Besisi Bet: Can-do statements 15-19
Besisi: Can-do statements 20-24
Mitkadmim Aleph: Can-do statements 25-30
Mitkadmim Bet: Can-do statements 31-36
Appendix 1
Can-do statements across the levels: Trom Besisi Aleph,
Trom Besisi Bet, Besisi, Mitkadmim Aleph, Mitkadmim Bet 37 -53
Appendix 2
Additional resources 54
Appendix 3
Suggestions for further reading 55-56
3
ECOSTAR
Introduction
New Challenges
The teaching of English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Israel faces multiple challenges in today's dynamic world of globalization. While traditionally students may have been considered well served just by being taught reading comprehension skills, today’s students need a much more extensive set of tools for coping with the requirements of internationalization in higher education and globalized job markets. During or after their studies, students may need to present their work in English, actively participate in international conferences and in personal and professional exchanges with colleagues abroad, write abstracts and posters, and understand spoken and written English in a wide variety of both formal and informal situations and contexts. Any current curriculum or framework of EAP must address these growing needs, which students and professionals experience on a daily basis. In view of these trends, academic English programs must prepare students to communicate effectively in English.
New Solutions
The CEFR-Aligned Framework for English in Higher Education in Israel (hereafter: the Framework) is an attempt to meet contemporary challenges and re-conceptualize the field of EAP in line with internationally accepted standards, while focusing on the specific needs of Israeli students. This Framework strives to bridge the local context of Israel (and, in some cases, of a specific institution or faculty) and the global context of English as used today.
The Framework has been developed as part of the ECOSTAR (English as the Cornerstone of Sustainable Technology and Research) initiative, a 15-partner consortium that connects experts in the fields of language teaching, learning, and assessment from several Israeli and EU institutions, in an effort to outline common goals for the teaching of EAP in higher education in Israel.
The ECOSTAR initiative created a Framework for English in Higher Education in Israel that conforms to European standards while satisfying the requirements of the Israeli Council for Higher Education (hereafter: CHE). One of the aims of the ECOSTAR project is to create a new learning environment for English in higher education. Its beliefs about language learning align with current understandings of what language knowledge comprises, referring to multiple literacies and the use of different modalities to convey meaning in all four language skills – reading, writing, speaking and listening. In addition, ECOSTAR promotes content-based and task-based instruction models in language teaching. In the case of higher education, this also refers to using the English language to teach academic content in different disciplines; i.e., English Medium Instruction, or EMI (ECOSTAR, 2014).
4
Introduction
Benefits of Using the CEFR
The primary goal of ECOSTAR is to introduce the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) to the field of EAP in Israel. The CEFR was proposed by the Council of Europe in 2001 as a set of standards and concepts for the teaching and assessment of foreign languages in Europe (see the overview of the CEFR below), and is now being used in over 120 countries throughout the world.
The adaptation and implementation of the CEFR in higher education in Israel has many potential benefits for learners, instructors and institutions. Firstly, the CEFR is based on current language education research and it promotes the adoption of cutting-edge teaching methods, materials and tools. Secondly, since its introduction, it has become widely used in an ever-growing number of educational contexts, and has become ‘a common language’ with which learners and teachers around the world are already familiar. This international recognition by organizations and institutions promotes student exchange and internationalization by facilitating mutual recognition and co-operation between higher education institutions in many different countries.
No less importantly, the ultimate goal of language education, which is also at the heart of the CEFR, should not be neglected or minimized: the creation of a plurilingual society in which language is used for better communication and collaboration among speakers of different languages and backgrounds (Council of Europe, 2002). We believe that the implementation of the Framework in universities and colleges across the country should be seen as the first step in this direction.
The Israeli Context
Needs Assessment Data
Since the CEFR was not originally conceived with EAP or the Israeli context in mind, the central goal in adapting the CEFR for EAP in Israel was to create a well-founded selective linkage between the actual needs of Israeli students and the standards and principles set out in the CEFR. For that purpose, two EU-funded TEMPUS surveys (one of them developed by ECOSTAR), were conducted and the opinions, requests and proposals of over 7000 students and graduates who participated were taken into consideration. ECOSTAR's research also surveyed EAP teachers in institutions of higher education in Israel so that their broad experience in the field and their sense of what their students need could be adequately reflected in the Framework. In addition, content lecturers across academic disciplines and throughout Israeli institutions of higher education were surveyed in order to ascertain their views regarding what graduates of higher education should be able to do in English.
In the Framework, CEFR can-do statements (see overview of the CEFR below) have been adapted and matched to the existing English proficiency levels mandated by the CHE. These levels are directly linked to scores on various English proficiency tests produced by the National Institute for Testing and Evaluation (NITE) - the English component of the Psychometric exam, AMIR and AMIRAM - that are used as placement criteria for students in need of EAP support (see Table 1).
5
ECOSTAR
Table 1:Cut-off scores, study levels, numbers of study hours and
students / Council for Higher Education (CHE) 2013
Division into levelsaccording to exam grade
Psychometric/Amiram
Amir LevelWeekly semester
study hours
Maximum recommended
number of students in course
134+ 234+ Exemption - -
120-133 220-233 Mitkadmim Bet 4 30
100-119 200-219 Mitkadmim Aleph 4 30
85-99 185-199 Besisi 6 30
70-84 170-184 Trom Besisi Bet 6 20
50-69 150-169 Trom Besisi Aleph 8 20
Consequent to the implementation of this Framework, standardized English tests produced by NITE are expected to be redesigned to better match the CEFR and a wider set of language skills. In turn, English levels are expected to rise, and the Framework will then be updated to reflect new proficiency levels.
One of the central goals of the Framework is to ensure a smooth transition of English studies from high school to higher education. Our student survey indicates that while the majority of respondents studied English at the highest level possible in high school (5-point Bagrut), most of the students did not reach exemption level on the various NITE tests. Both the recent introduction of a revised curriculum for English in schools by the Ministry of Education (2013) – aimed at modernizing the teaching of English in schools – and the present Framework are important steps towards this goal. To streamline the transition, the Framework builds on the English curriculum for schools and uses similar concepts whenever possible. Together with the future restructuring of NITE's English proficiency exams, we hope that these measures will help harmonize and modernize the entire field of English teaching, learning and assessment from primary to higher education.
Heterogeneous Populations, Diverse Needs
In addition to the gap between English in secondary education and in higher education, the Framework addresses a number of additional issues unique to the Israeli context. The population in Israel is
6
Introduction
ethnically and linguistically heterogeneous, comprising a majority of Hebrew speakers, but also a large number of Arabic speakers. There are also speakers of additional languages who immigrated to the country, mainly from Russian-speaking countries. For the non-Hebrew speakers, English represents a third or even a fourth language. Also relevant are issues such as the English needs of students in different educational contexts as well as social, educational and economic inequalities that exist within Israeli society.
It is hoped that the implementation of the Framework will contribute to achieving a balance between the advantages of meeting international standards in English language teaching and the need to take into consideration the social and educational contexts that characterize Israeli society. Aligning EAP courses with the CEFR is an important milestone towards integrating student needs with state-of-the-art international language education standards and principles while ensuring fairness and equity. In order to achieve this goal, we believe that a continuous, iterative process of implementation, evaluation and design is required, one in which EAP teachers form a professional community of practice that works together towards common goals.
7
ECOSTAR
Overview of the CEFR
As levels of language learning such as basic, intermediate or advanced can have different meanings for different countries and for different institutions within the same country, the Council of Europe developed the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR) whose main purpose was to establish international standards for learning, teaching and assessing modern languages.
In particular, the aim of the CEFR is as follows: “It was designed to provide a transparent, coherent and comprehensive basis for the elaboration of language syllabuses and curriculum guidelines, the design of teaching and learning materials, and the assessment of foreign language proficiency” (Council of Europe, 2014). Since its first publication in 2001, the CEFR has achieved a dominant role in language education not only throughout Europe but in many countries around the world (Byram & Parmenter, 2012).
The CEFR describes what a learner can do at six specific levels:
Basic User (A1 and A2)
Independent User (B1 and B2)
Proficient User (C1 and C2)
These descriptions appear in condensed form in what is called the "Global Scale," (see Figure 2). When reviewing this table please note that the levels A1, A2, B1, and B2 generally correspond to the levels Trom Besisi Aleph and Bet (together paralleling A1), Besisi (A2), Mitkadmim Aleph (B1) and Mitkadmim Bet (B2). In most institutions of higher education that have adopted the CEFR, B2 is set as the exit level for EAP requirements. However, as reading has been a central element in EAP in Israel, we may find that the CHE levels for reading may be higher than those described in the CEFR global scale. On the other hand, for all other aspects of language, namely listening, speaking and writing, there may still be a gap between the levels described on the CEFR global scale and those defined at the Trom Besisi Aleph and Bet, Besisi, Mitkadmim Aleph and Mitkadmim Bet levels.
8
Overview of the CEFR
ProficientUser
C2
Can understand with ease virtually everything heard or read. Can
summarise information from different spoken and written sources,
reconstructing arguments and accounts in a coherent presentation. Can
express him/herself spontaneously, very fluently and precisely,
differentiating finer shades of meaning even in more complex situations.
C1
Can understand a wide range of demanding, longer texts, and recognise
implicit meaning. Can express him/herself fluently and spontaneously
without much obvious searching for expressions. Can use language flexibly
and effectively for social, academic and professional purposes. Can produce
clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled
use of organisational patterns, connectors and cohesive devices.
IndependentUser
B2
Can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and
abstract topics, including technical discussions in his/her field of
specialisation. Can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that
makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain
for either party. Can produce clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects
and explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and
disadvantages of various options.
B1
Can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters
regularly encountered in work, school, leisure, etc. Can deal with most
situations likely to arise whilst travelling in an area where the language is
spoken. Can produce simple connected text on topics which are familiar or
of personal interest. Can describe experiences and events, dreams, hopes
and ambitions and briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and
plans.
BasicUser
A2
Can understand sentences and frequently used expressions related to areas
of most immediate relevance (e.g. very basic personal and family
information, shopping, local geography, employment). Can communicate in
simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of
information on familiar and routine matters. Can describe in simple terms
aspects of his/her background, immediate environment and matters in areas
of immediate need.
A1
Can understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic
phrases aimed at the satisfaction of needs of a concrete type. Can introduce
him/herself and others and can ask and answer questions about personal
details such as where he/she lives, people he/she knows and things he/she
has. Can interact in a simple way provided the other person talks slowly and
clearly and is prepared to help.
Figure - 2 Common Reference Levels - The Global Scale1
1 Common European Framework of Reference For Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, p. 24. Accessed from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf.
Note that the descriptors are formulated in very general terms as they were designed to suit all foreign languages.
9
ECOSTAR
According to the CEFR, language proficiency is a multi-dimensional construct, which applies to four different domains (educational, occupational, public and personal), four different types of language activities (reception, production, interaction and mediation), and two language media (oral and written).
Though the CEFR is not prescriptive in relation to teaching, it does have methodological implications as it espouses a communicative, task-based approach. It defines knowledge of a language in a series of 'can-do' statements that represent what learners can do with the language in a real world context. It should be noted that the can-do statements are always positive: they describe what a learner is able to do, not what a learner cannot do or does wrong. The main assumption is that the skills relevant to the more advanced proficiency levels can only be developed on the basis of extensive use of the target language. The can-do descriptors relate to reception, production, interaction and mediation. Can-do descriptors are also provided for some of the strategies employed in performing communicative activities, as these are a bridge between a learner's resources (competences) and what he/she can do with them (communicative activities).
Each can-do descriptor can be used not only to specify a learning target and select and/or develop learning activities and materials, but also to design assessment tasks. Thus, curriculum, teaching, learning and assessment are interdependent.
The following section provides a glossary of terms that are used in the CEFR and which have been adopted in the present Framework.
Glossary of Terms
Except for the names of the five levels of study (Trom Besisi Aleph, Trom Besisi Bet, Besisi, Mitkadmim Aleph and Mitkadmim Bet) that have been defined by the CHE, the terminology used in this document is in keeping with that used in the CEFR. Following are general definitions of terms that appear in the CEFR; however, to understand the terms in greater depth one may refer to the original definitions as they appear in the CEFR itself (accessed from http://coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf).
Domain refers to a particular sector of life. These are the major categories relevant to language learning/teaching and use:
Educational domain - concerned with the learning context, mainly formal institutional
Occupational domain - relates to activities and relations on the job
Public domain - everything connected with ordinary social interaction--public services, administrative bodies, leisure activities of a public nature, etc.
Personal domain - relates to family relations, home life, reading for pleasure, etc.
Language activities involve the exercise of one's communicative language competence in a specific
10
Overview of the CEFR
domain in the processing (receptively and/or productively) of one or more texts in order to carry out a task. The language activities in this document have been divided into four kinds: reception, production, interaction and mediation:
Reception - including silent reading, following the media, understanding course content, etc.
Production - including oral presentations and written papers.
Interaction - at least two individuals participate in an oral and/or written exchange in which production and reception alternate and sometimes overlap.
Mediation - enabling communication between persons who are unable to communicate directly, through translation, paraphrase, summary, or providing for a third party a
(re)formulation of a source text to which this third party does not have direct access.
Skills appear within each of these activities (reception, production, interaction and mediation). The skills include reading, listening, writing and speaking.
Communicative strategies are the application of metacognitive principles of pre-planning, execution, monitoring and repair in relation to the different kinds of language activities. They reflect the adoption of a particular line of action in order to maximize effectiveness.
Communicative competence relates to those competencies that enable a person to act using specifically linguistic means. Communicative competence in this Framework consists of three components: linguistic, sociolinguistic and pragmatic.
Linguistic competences include knowledge of lexis, phonology, and syntax.
Sociolinguistic competences relate to the awareness of social conventions (e.g. rules of politeness).
Pragmatic competences relate to the functional use of linguistic resources (e.g. speech acts) as well as the mastery of discourse, cohesion and coherence, and the identification of text types and forms.
11
ECOSTAR
Bibliography
Byram, M. & Parmenter L. (Eds.) (2012). The Common European Framework of Reference: The globalization of language education policy. Multilingual Matters.
Council of Europe (2014). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Accessed from
http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ECOSTAR. (2014). Retrieved from https://tempus-ecostar.iucc.ac.il/about-ecostar/
Israel Ministry of Education (2013). Revised English Curriculum: Principles and Standards for Learning English as an International Language for All Grades. Accessed from
http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/HaarachatOvdeyHoraa/Englishcurriculum.pdf
12
Trom Besisi ALEPH
Trom Besisi ALEPH
Global scale: Can understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic vocabulary. Can ask and answer questions about personal details such as where he/she lives, people he/she knows and things he/she has (adapted A1).
"Can-dos" for activities:"Language activities involve the exercise of one’s communicative language competence in a specific domain in processing (receptively and/or productively) one or more texts in order to carry out a task" (CEFR, p. 10).
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Reading
Overall reading comprehension
Can understand short, simple texts containing the highest frequency vocabulary, including a proportion of shared international vocabulary items (A2)
x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for orientation
Can recognize familiar names, words and very basic phrases on simple notices in the most common everyday situations (A1)
x x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for information and argument
Can get an idea of the content of simpler informational material and short simple descriptions, especially if there is visual support (A1)
x x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening toaudio-visual
Can follow changes of topic of factual TV news items, and form an idea of the main content (A2)
x x x x
Production / Writing
Overall written production
Can write simple, isolated words and phrases(adapted A1)
x x x x
Production / Speaking
Overall spoken production
Can produce simple, mainly isolated phrases about people and places (A1)
x x x x
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Describing experience
Can describe him/herself, what he/she does and where he/she lives (A1)
x x x x
13
ECOSTAR
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Interaction / Spoken
Overall spoken interaction
Can interact in a simple way, but communication is totally dependent on repetition at a slower rate of speech, rephrasing and repair. Can ask and answer simple questions, initiate and respond to simple statements in areas of immediate need or on very familiar topics (A1)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Conversation Can make an introduction and use basic greeting and leave-taking expressions. Can ask how people are and react to news. Can understand everyday expressions aimed at the satisfaction of simple needs of a concrete type, delivered directly to him/her in clear, slow and repeated speech by a sympathetic speaker (A1)
x x
Interaction / Spoken
Information exchange
Can understand questions and instructions addressed carefully and slowly to him/her and follow short, simple directions. Can ask and answer simple questions, initiate and respond to simple statements in areas of immediate need or on very familiar topics. Can ask and answer questions about themselves and other people, where they live, people they know, things they have. Can indicate time by such phrases as next week, last Friday, in November, three o'clock (A1)
x x x x
Working with texts
Activity / Skill
Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Mediation / Processing text
Can copy out single words and short texts presented in standard printed format (A1)
x x x
14
Trom Besisi ALEPH
"Can-dos" for communicative language competence and components:Communicative language competences "empower a person to act using specifically linguistic means" (CEFR, p. 9). "For the realisation of communicative intentions, users/learners bring to bear their general capacities…together with a more specifically language-related communicative competence. Communicative competence in this narrower sense has the following components: linguistic competences, sociolinguistic competences, pragmatic competences" (CEFR, p. 108).
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Linguistic General linguistic range
Has a very basic range of simple expressions about personal details and needs of a concrete type (A1)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary range Has a basic vocabulary repertoire of isolated words and phrases related to particular concrete situations (A1)
x x x
Linguistic Grammatical accuracy
Shows only limited control of a few simple grammatical structures and sentence patterns in a learned repertoire (A1)
x x
Linguistic Orthographic control
Can copy familiar words and short phrases, e.g. simple signs or instructions, names of everyday objects, names of shops and set phrases used regularly. Can spell his/her address, nationality and other personal details (A1)
x x
Sociolinguistic Sociolinguistic appropriateness
Can establish basic social contact by using the simplest everyday polite forms of: greetings and farewells; introductions; saying please, thank you, sorry, etc. (A1)
Pragmatic Coherence Can link words or groups of words with very basic linear connectors like 'and' or 'then' (A1)
x x x x
Pragmatic Spoken fluency Can manage very short, isolated, mainly pre-packaged utterances, with much pausing to search for expressions, to articulate less familiar words, and to repair communication (A1)
x x x
15
ECOSTAR
Trom Besisi BET
Global scale: Can understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at the satisfaction of needs of a concrete type. Can ask and answer questions about everyday matters. Can interact in a simple way provided the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help (adapted A1).
"Can-dos" for activities:"Language activities involve the exercise of one’s communicative language competence in a specific domain in processing (receptively and/or productively) one or more texts in order to carry out a task" (CEFR, p. 10).
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Reading
Overall reading comprehension
Can understand short, simple texts on familiar matters of a concrete type which consist of high frequency everyday or job-related language (A2+)
x x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for orientation
Can find specific, predictable information in simple everyday material such as advertisements, prospectuses, menus, reference lists and timetables (A2)
x x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for information and argument
Can identify specific information in simpler written material he/she encounters such as letters, brochures and short newspaper articles describing events (A2)
x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to announcements and instructions
Can understand instructions addressed carefully and slowly to him/her and follow short, simple directions (A1)
x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio Can understand and extract the essential information from short recorded passages dealing with predictable everyday matters that are delivered slowly and clearly (A2)
x x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio-visual
Can identify the main point of TV news items reporting events, accidents, etc. where the visual supports the commentary (A2+)
x x x x
Production / Writing
Overall written production
Can write simple isolated phrases and sentences (A1) x x x x
16
Trom Besisi BET
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Production / Writing
Creative writing Can write simple phrases and sentences about themselves (adapted A1)
x x x x
Production / Speaking
Overall spoken production
Can give a simple description as a short series of simple phrases (adapted A2)
x x x x
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Describing experience
Can describe everyday aspects of his/her environment, e.g. people, places, a job or study experience. Can give short, basic descriptions of events and activities (A2+)
x x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Overall spoken interaction
Can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on familiar and routine matters to do with work and free time. Can handle very short social exchanges but is rarely able to understand enough to keep conversation going of his/her own accord (A2)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Conversation Can use simple everyday polite forms of greeting and address. Can make and respond to invitations and apologies. Can say what he/she likes and dislikes (A2)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Information exchange
Can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information. Can exchange limited information on familiar and routine operational matters. Can ask and answer questions about what they do at work and in free time. Can ask for and give directions referring to a map or plan. Can ask for and provide personal information (A2)
x x x
Interaction / Written
Overall written interaction
Can ask for or pass on personal details in written form (A1)
x x x x
17
ECOSTAR
"Can-dos" for communicative strategies:"The use of communication strategies can be seen as the application of the metacognitive principles: Pre-planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Repair Action to the different kinds of communicative activity: Reception, Interaction, Production and Mediation. The word ‘strategies’ has been used in different ways. Here what is meant is the adoption of a particular line of action in order to maximise effectiveness" (CEFR, p. 57).
Activity / Skill
Communicative strategy
Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Interaction / Spoken
Asking for clarification Can ask very simply for repetition when he/she does not understand (A2+)
x x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Compensating Can use an inadequate word from his/her repertoire and use gesture to clarify what he/she wants to say (A2+)
x x x x
Working with texts
Activity / Skill
Can-do
DomainsEd
ucat
iona
l
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Mediation / Processing text
Can copy out short texts in printed or clearly hand-written format (A2) x x x
18
Trom Besisi BET
"Can-dos" for communicative language competence and components:Communicative language competences "empower a person to act using specifically linguistic means" (CEFR, p. 9). "For the realisation of communicative intentions, users/learners bring to bear their general capacities…together with a more specifically language-related communicative competence. Communicative competence in this narrower sense has the following components: linguistic competences, sociolinguistic competences, pragmatic competences" (CEFR, p. 108).
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Linguistic General linguistic range
Can produce brief everyday expressions in order to satisfy simple needs of a concrete type: personal details, daily routines, wants and needs, requests for information. Can use basic sentence patterns and communicate with memorized phrases, groups of a few words and formulae about themselves and other people, what they do, places, possessions, etc. Has a limited repertoire of short memorized phrases covering predictable survival situations; frequent breakdowns and misunderstandings occur in non-routine situations (A2)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary control Can control a narrow repertoire dealing with concrete everyday needs (A2)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary range Has a sufficient vocabulary for the expression of basic communicative needs. Has a sufficient vocabulary for coping with simple survival needs (A2)
x x x
Linguistic Grammatical accuracy
Uses some simple structures correctly, but still systematically makes basic mistakes - for example tends to mix up tenses and forget to mark agreement (adapted A2)
x x
Linguistic Phonological control
Pronunciation of a very limited repertoire of learned words and phrases can be understood with great effort by native speakers dealing with speakers of his/her language group (adapted A1)
x x x
19
ECOSTAR
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Linguistic Orthographic control
Can copy short sentences on everyday subjects - e.g. directions how to get somewhere. Can write with reasonable phonetic accuracy (but not necessarily fully standard spelling) short words that are in his/her oral vocabulary (A2)
x x
Sociolinguistic Sociolinguistic appropriateness
Can handle very short social exchanges, using everyday polite forms of greeting and address. Can make and respond to invitations, apologies, etc. (A2)
Pragmatic Coherence Can link groups of words with simple connectors like "and", "but" and "because" (A2)
x x x x
Pragmatic Propositional precision
Can communicate what he/she wants to say in a simple and direct exchange of limited information on familiar and routine matters, but in other situations he/she generally has to compromise the message (A2)
x x x x
Pragmatic Spoken fluency Can make him/herself understood in short contributions, even though pauses, false starts and reformulation are very evident (A2+)
x x x
20
Besisi
Besisi
Global scale: Can understand sentences and frequently used expressions related to areas of most immediate relevance (e.g. very basic personal and family information, shopping, local geography, employment). Can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on familiar and routine matters. Can describe in simple terms aspects of his/her background, immediate environment and matters in areas of immediate need. (A2)
"Can-dos" for activities:"Language activities involve the exercise of one’s communicative language competence in a specific domain in processing (receptively and/or productively) one or more texts in order to carry out a task" (CEFR, p. 10).
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Reading
Overall reading comprehension
Can read straightforward factual texts on general subjects with a satisfactory level of comprehension, i.e., understand most main ideas and supporting details (adapted B1)
x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for orientation
Can scan/read selectively in order to find desired information (adapted B1+)
x x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for information and argument
Can recognize significant points in straightforward articles on familiar subjects (adapted B1)
x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening as a member of a live audience
Can follow in outline straightforward short talks on familiar topics provided these are delivered in clearly articulated standard speech (B1)
x x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to announcements and instructions
Can catch the main point in short, clear, simple messages and announcements (A2)
x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio Can understand the main points of radio news bulletins and simpler recorded material about familiar subjects delivered relatively slowly and clearly (B1)
x x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio-visual
Can understand the main points in videos on familiar subjects delivered relatively slowly and clearly (adapted B1)
x x x x
21
ECOSTAR
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Production / Writing
Overall written production
Can write a series of interrelated sentences (adapted A2)
x x x x
Production / Writing
Creative writing Can write about everyday aspects of his/her environment, e.g. people, places, a job or study experience, in linked sentences (A2+)
x x x x
Production / Speaking
Overall spoken production
Can give a simple description or presentation as a short series of sentences (adapted A2)
x x x x
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Describing experience
Can explain what he/she likes or dislikes about something (A2+)
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Putting a case (e.g. in a debate)
Can briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions, plans and actions (B1)
x x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Overall spoken interaction
Can interact with reasonable ease in structured situations and short conversations, provided the other person helps if necessary. Can manage simple, routine exchanges without undue effort; can ask and answer questions and exchange ideas and information on familiar topics in predictable everyday situations (A2+)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Conversation Can establish social contact: greetings and farewells, introductions, giving thanks. Can generally understand clear, standard speech on familiar matters directed at him/her, provided he/she can ask for repetition or reformulation from time to time. Can participate in short conversations in routine contexts on topics of interest. Can express how he/she feels in simple terms, and express thanks (A2+)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Information exchange
Can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information (A2)
x x x
Interaction / Written
Overall written interaction
Can write short, simple formulaic notes relating to matters in areas of immediate need (A2)
x x x x
22
Besisi
"Can-dos" for communicative strategies:"The use of communication strategies can be seen as the application of the metacognitive principles: Pre-planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Repair Action to the different kinds of communicative activity: Reception, Interaction, Production and Mediation. The word ‘strategies’ has been used in different ways. Here what is meant is the adoption of a particular line of action in order to maximise effectiveness" (CEFR, p. 57).
Activity / Skill
Communicative strategy
Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Reading and Listening
Identifying cues and inferring (spoken and written)
Can use an idea of the overall meaning of short texts and utterances on everyday topics of a concrete type to derive the probable meaning of unknown words from the context (A2)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Asking for clarification Can ask for clarification about key words or phrases not understood using stock phrases (A2+)
x x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Compensating Can paraphrase/can use a simple word meaning something similar to the concept he/she wants to convey and invites "correction" (adapted B1)
x x x x
Working with texts
Activity / Skill
Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Mediation / Processing text
Can pick out and reproduce key words and phrases or short sentences from a short text within the learner's limited competence and experience (A2+)
x x x
23
ECOSTAR
"Can-dos" for communicative language competence and components:Communicative language competences "empower a person to act using specifically linguistic means" (CEFR, p. 9). "For the realisation of communicative intentions, users/learners bring to bear their general capacities…together with a more specifically language-related communicative competence. Communicative competence in this narrower sense has the following components: linguistic competences, sociolinguistic competences, pragmatic competences" (CEFR, p. 108).
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Linguistic General linguistic range
Has a repertoire of basic language, which enables him/her to deal with everyday situations with predictable content, though he/she will generally have to compromise the message and search for words (A2+)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary control Shows good control of high frequency vocabulary but major errors still occur when expressing more complex thoughts or handling unfamiliar topics and situations (adapted B1)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary range Has sufficient vocabulary to conduct routine, everyday transactions involving familiar situations and topics (A2+)
x x x
Linguistic Grammatical accuracy
Uses reasonably accurately a repertoire of frequently used "routines" and patterns associated with more predictable situations (B1)
x x
Linguistic Phonological control
Pronunciation of learned words and phrases can be understood with some effort by most partners (adapted A1)
x x x
Linguistic Orthographic control
Can produce continuous writing, which is generally intelligible throughout. Spelling, punctuation and layout are accurate enough to be followed most of the time (B1)
x x
Sociolinguistic Sociolinguistic appropriateness
Can socialize simply but effectively using the simplest common expressions and following basic routines (A2+)
Pragmatic Thematic development
Can tell a story or describe something in a simple list of points (A2)
x x x x
24
Besisi
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Pragmatic Coherence Can use the most frequently occurring connectors to link simple sentences in order to tell a story or describe something as a simple list of points (A2+)
x x x x
Pragmatic Propositional precision
Can express the main point he/she wants to make comprehensibly (B1)
x x x x
Pragmatic Spoken fluency Can keep going comprehensibly, even though pausing for grammatical and lexical planning and repair is very evident, especially in longer stretches of free production (B1)
x x x
25
ECOSTAR
Mitkadmim Aleph
Global scale:Can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, leisure, etc. Can deal with most situations likely to arise while traveling in an area where the language is spoken. Can produce simple connected text on topics which are familiar or of personal interest. Can describe [in speech] experiences and events, dreams, hopes and ambitions and briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and plans. (B1)
"Can-dos" for activities:"Language activities involve the exercise of one’s communicative language competence in a specific domain in processing (receptively and/or productively) one or more texts in order to carry out a task" (CEFR, p. 10).
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Reading
Overall reading comprehension
Can read, with a large degree of independence, relatively short academic texts on general subjects that do not require field-specific/expert knowledge (adapted B2)
x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for orientation
Can scan longer texts in order to locate desired information, and gather information from different parts of a text to fulfill a specific task (adapted B1+)
x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for information and argument
Can identify the main conclusions in clearly signaled argumentative texts (B1+)
x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for information and argument
Can follow the main line of argument in texts that present issues, though not necessarily in detail (adapted B1+)
x x
Reception / Reading
Reading instructions
Can understand clearly written, straightforward instructions (adapted B1)
x x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening as a member of a live audience
Can follow a lecture or talk provided the subject matter is familiar and the presentation is straightforward and clearly structured (adapted B1+)
x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to announcements and instructions
Can follow detailed instructions and directions (adapted B1)
x x x
26
Mitkadmim Aleph
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio Can understand the content of the majority of recorded or broadcast audio material delivered in standard dialect on topics in his or her field, delivered relatively slowly and clearly (adapted B1 and B1+)
x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio-visual
Can follow videos in which visuals and action aid understanding and which are delivered clearly in straightforward language (adapted B1)
x x x
Production / Writing
Overall written production
Can write a paragraph comprising a series of sentences linked with appropriate connectors, such as "and", "but", and "because" (adapted A2)
x x x x
Production / Writing
Creative writing Can write very short, basic descriptions of events, past activities and personal experiences (A2+)
Production / Writing
Reports and essays Can summarize a short academic text on general subjects that do not require field-specific/expert knowledge (new)
x x
Production / Speaking
Overall spoken production
Can reasonably fluently sustain a straightforward description of one of a variety of subjects within his/her field of interest, presenting it as a linear sequence of points (B1)
x x x
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Describing experience
Can give detailed accounts of experiences, describing feelings and reactions, and can describe events (adapted B1)
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Putting a case (e.g. in a debate)
Can develop an argument well enough to be followed without difficulty most of the time (B1+)
x x x
Production / Speaking
Addressing audiences
Can give a prepared straightforward presentation on a familiar topic which is clear enough to be followed without difficulty most of the time, and in which the main points are explained with reasonable precision (adapted B1)
x x x
Production / Speaking
Addressing audiences
Can take a series of straightforward follow-up questions but may have to ask for repetition of the question(s) (adapted B1)
x x
27
ECOSTAR
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Interaction / Spoken
Overall spoken interaction
Can exploit a wide range of simple language to interact in most situations. Can express personal opinions and exchange information on topics that are familiar or of personal interest (adapted B1)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Conversation Can follow clearly articulated speech directed at him/her in everyday conversation, though will sometimes have to ask for repetition of particular words and phrases. Can maintain a conversation or discussion but may sometimes be difficult to follow when trying to say exactly what he/she would like to do (B1)
x
Interaction / Spoken
Information exchange
Can find out and pass on straightforward factual information (B1)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Information exchange
Can obtain more detailed information by asking questions and/or requesting clarification(adapted B1)
x x x
Interaction / Written
Overall written interaction
Can ask for or convey simple information of immediate relevance, getting across the point he/she feels to be important (adapted B1)
x x x
Interaction / Written
Notes and messages
Can take a short simple message provided he or she can ask for repetition (A2)
x x x
"Can-dos" for communicative strategies:
"The use of communication strategies can be seen as the application of the metacognitive principles: Pre-planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Repair Action to the different kinds of communicative activity: Reception, Interaction, Production and Mediation. The word ‘strategies’ has been used in different ways. Here what is meant is the adoption of a particular line of action in order to maximise effectiveness" (CEFR, p. 57).
28
Mitkadmim Aleph
ActivityCommunicative
strategyCan-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception Identifying cues and inferring (spoken and written)
Can identify unfamiliar words from the context on topics related to his/her field and interests. Can extrapolate the meaning of occasional unknown words from the context and deduce sentence meaning provided the topic discussed is familiar (B1)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Asking for clarification Can ask someone to clarify or elaborate what he or she has just said (B1)
x x x
Interaction / Spoken
Compensating Can define the features of something concrete for which he/she cannot remember the word. Can convey meaning by qualifying a word meaning something similar (e.g. a truck for people = bus) (B1+)
x x
Working with texts
Activity / Skill
Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reading for text type
Can identify a limited range of academic genres and rhetorical structures based on the general features of the text and apply appropriate reading strategies and skills (new)
x x
Mediation / Note-taking
Can take notes as a list of key points during a straightforward lecture, provided the topic is familiar, and the talk is both formulated in simple language and delivered in clearly articulated standard speech (B1)
x
Mediation / Processing text
Can paraphrase short written passages in a simple fashion, using the original text wording and ordering (B1)
x
29
ECOSTAR
"Can-dos" for communicative language competence and components:Communicative language competences "empower a person to act using specifically linguistic means" (CEFR, p. 9). "For the realisation of communicative intentions, users/learners bring to bear their general capacities…together with a more specifically language-related communicative competence. Communicative competence in this narrower sense has the following components: linguistic competences, sociolinguistic competences, pragmatic competences" (CEFR, p. 108).
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Linguistic General linguistic range
Has enough language to get by, with sufficient vocabulary to express him/herself with some hesitation and circumlocutions on topics such as family, hobbies and interests, work, travel, and current events, but lexical limitations cause repetition and even difficulty with formulation at times (B1)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary control Shows good control of high frequency vocabulary and of a limited repertoire of low frequency vocabulary, though some incorrect word choice may hinder communication (adapted B2)
x x
Linguistic Vocabulary range Has a sufficient vocabulary to express him/herself with some circumlocutions on most general topics (adapted B1)
x x x
Linguistic Grammatical accuracy
Communicates with reasonable accuracy in familiar contexts; generally good control though with noticeable mother tongue influence. Errors occur, but it is clear what he/she is trying to express (B1+)
x x x
Linguistic Phonological control
Pronunciation is generally clear enough to be understood despite a noticeable foreign accent, but conversational partners will need to ask for repetition from time to time (A2)
x x
30
Mitkadmim Aleph
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Linguistic Orthographic control
Can produce clearly intelligible continuous writing which follows standard layout and paragraphing conventions. Spelling and punctuation are reasonably accurate but may show signs of mother tongue influence (B2)
x x
Sociolinguistic Sociolinguistic appropriateness
Can perform and respond to a wide range of language functions, in a neutral register. Is aware of the salient politeness conventions and acts appropriately (B1)
x
Pragmatic Thematic development
Can reasonably relate a straightforward narrative or description as a linear sequence of points (adapted B1)
x x x x
Pragmatic Coherence Can link a series of shorter, discrete simple elements into a connected, linear sequence of points (B1)
x x x
Pragmatic Propositional precision
Can explain the main points in an idea or problem with reasonable precision (B1+)
x x x
Pragmatic Spoken fluency Can express him/herself with relative ease. Despite some problems with formulation resulting in pauses, he/she is able to keep going (adapted B1+)
x x x
31
ECOSTAR
Mitkadmim Bet
Global scale: Can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and abstract topics, including technical discussions in his/her field of specialization. Can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain for either party. Can produce clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects and explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options. (B2)
"Can-dos" for activities:"Language activities involve the exercise of one’s communicative language competence in a specific domain in processing (receptively and/or productively) one or more texts in order to carry out a task" (CEFR, p. 10).
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Reading
Overall reading comprehension
Can understand in detail lengthy, complex texts that relate to his/her own area of specialty provided that he/she can re-read difficult sections (adapted C1)
x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for orientation
Can scan longer texts in order to locate desired information, and gather information from different parts of a text, or from different texts in order to fulfil a specific task (B1+)
x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for orientation
Can skim to identify the content and relevance of academic articles and reports and decide whether closer reading is worthwhile (adapted B2)
x
Reception / Reading
Reading for information and argument
Can obtain and synthesize information, ideas and opinions from multiple sources within his/her field (adapted B2+)
x x
Reception / Reading
Reading for information and argument
Can understand articles and reports concerned with issues in which the writers adopt particular stances or viewpoints (adapted B2)
x x x
Reception / Reading
Reading correspondence
Can understand professional correspondence relating to his/her occupation/field of interest and readily grasp the essential meaning (adapted B2)
x x
Reception / Reading
Reading instructions
Can understand lengthy, complex instructions in his or her field, provided he or she can re-read difficult sections (adapted B2)
x x
32
Mitkadmim Bet
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Listening
Listening as a member of a live audience
Can follow the essentials of lectures, talks and reports and other forms of presentation which are propositionally and linguistically complex (B2)
x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to announcements and instructions
Can understand spoken announcements, instructions and messages spoken at natural speed in a variety of situations and for a variety of purposes (adapted B2)
x x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio Can understand the content of audio recordings in standard dialect likely to be encountered in academic/professional life and identify speaker viewpoints (adapted B2+)
x x
Reception / Listening
Listening to audio-visual
Can understand academic/professional content of audio-visuals (e.g. videos, TV news, current affairs programs, and documentaries) (adapted B2)
x x
Production / Writing
Overall written production
Can write short, cohesive texts on a range of familiar topics within his/her field of interest and/or expertise (adapted B1)
x x
Production / Writing
Creative writing Can write straightforward, detailed descriptions on a range of familiar subjects within his/her field of interest (B1)
Production / Writing
Reports and essays Can write short, simple essays on topics of interest (B1+)Can summarize and synthesize from a variety of sources, write a report and give his/her opinion on familiar routine and non-routine matters within his/her field with some confidence (adapted B1+)
x x
Production / Speaking
Overall spoken production
Can give clear, detailed descriptions and presentations on a wide range of subjects related to his/her field of interest, expanding and supporting ideas with subsidiary points and relevant examples (B2)
x x
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Describing experience
Can give clear, detailed descriptions on a wide range of subjects related to his/her field of interest (B2)
Production / Speaking
Sustained monologue: Putting a case (e.g., in a debate)
Can develop a clear argument, expanding and supporting his/her points of view at some length with subsidiary points and relevant examples (B2)
x x
33
ECOSTAR
Activity / Skill
Heading Can-do
Domain
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Production / Speaking
Addressing audiences
Can give a clear, prepared academic presentation, giving reasons in support of or against a particular point of view and giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options (adapted B2)
x
Production / Speaking
Addressing audiences
Can take a series of follow up questions with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that poses no strain for either him/herself or the audience (B2)
x x
Interaction / Spoken
Overall spoken interaction
Can interact with some confidence on familiar routine and non-routine matters related to his/her interests and professional field (adapted B1+)
x x
Interaction / Spoken
Conversation Can engage in extended conversation on most general topics in a clearly participatory fashion. Can convey degrees of emotion and highlight the personal significance of events and experiences (B2)
x x
Interaction / Spoken
Information exchange
Can exchange, check and confirm accumulated factual information on familiar routine and non-routine matters in his/her field with some confidence (B1+)
x x
Interaction / Spoken
Information exchange
Can summarize and give his/her own opinion about a topic in his/her own field with some confidence (adapted B1+)
x x
Interaction / Written
Overall written interaction
Can convey information and ideas on abstract as well as concrete topics, check information and ask about or explain problems with reasonable precision (B1)
x x
Interaction / Written
Notes and messages
Can write messages conveying simple information of immediate relevance to teachers and peers, getting across comprehensibly the points he/she feels are important and respond to such messages in kind (adapted B1)
x x
34
Mitkadmim Bet
"Can-dos" for communicative strategies:"The use of communication strategies can be seen as the application of the metacognitive principles: Pre-planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Repair Action to the different kinds of communicative activity: Reception, Interaction, Production and Mediation. The word ‘strategies’ has been used in different ways. Here what is meant is the adoption of a particular line of action in order to maximise effectiveness" (CEFR, p. 57).
Activity / Skill
Communicative strategy
Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reception / Reading and Listening
Identifying cues and inferring (spoken and written)
Can use a variety of strategies to achieve comprehension, including listening for main points and checking comprehension by using contextual clues (B2)Can use contextual, grammatical and lexical cues to infer attitude, mood and intentions and anticipate what will come next (adapted C1)
x x
Interaction / Spoken
Asking for clarification Can ask follow-up questions to check that he/she has understood what the speaker intended to say, and get clarification of ambiguous points (B2)
x x
Interaction / Spoken
Compensating Can use circumlocution and paraphrase to cover gaps in vocabulary and structure (B2)
x x
Working with texts
Activity / Skill
Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Reading for text type
Can identify academic genres relevant to his or her field (e.g. empirical research, research reviews, theoretical texts, etc.) and adapt reading strategies and skills accordingly when navigating the text (new)
x
Mediation / Note-taking
Can take notes during a lecture, which are precise enough for his/her own use at a later date, provided the topic is within his/her field of interest and the talk is clear and well structured (B1+)
x x
Mediation / Processing text
Can integrate information from several sources and summarize them for somebody else (adapted B1)
x
35
ECOSTAR
"Can-dos" for communicative language competence and components:Communicative language competences "empower a person to act using specifically linguistic means" (CEFR, p. 9). "For the realisation of communicative intentions, users/learners bring to bear their general capacities…together with a more specifically language-related communicative competence. Communicative competence in this narrower sense has the following components: linguistic competences, sociolinguistic competences, pragmatic competences" (CEFR, p. 108).
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Linguistic General linguistic range
Has a sufficient range of language to describe [in writing] unpredictable situations, explain the main points in an idea or problem with reasonable precision and express thoughts on abstract or cultural topics (adapted B1+)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary control Lexical accuracy is generally high, though some confusion and incorrect word choice does occur without hindering communication (B2)
x x x
Linguistic Vocabulary range Has a good range of vocabulary for matters connected to his/her field and most general topics. Can vary formulation to avoid frequent repetition, but lexical gaps can still cause hesitation and circumlocution (B2)
x x x
Linguistic Grammatical accuracy
Shows a relatively high degree of grammatical control and does not make mistakes that lead to misunderstanding (B2)
x x x
Linguistic Phonological control
Pronunciation is clearly intelligible even if a foreign accent is sometimes evident and occasional mispronunciations occur (B1)
x x
Linguistic Orthographic control
Layout, paragraphing and punctuation are consistent and helpful. Spelling is accurate, apart from occasional slips of the pen (C1)
x x x
Sociolinguistic Sociolinguistic appropriateness
Can express him or herself confidently [in writing], clearly and politely in formal or informal register, appropriate to the situation and person(s) concerned (B2+)
36
Mitkadmim Bet
Communicative competence
Component Can-do
Domains
Educ
atio
nal
Occ
upat
iona
l
Publ
ic
Pers
onal
Pragmatic Thematic development
Can develop a clear description or narrative, expanding and supporting his/her main points with relevant supporting detail and examples (B2)
x x
Pragmatic Coherence Can use a number of cohesive devices to link his/her utterances into clear, coherent discourse, though may be uneven in long contribution (adapted B2)
x x
Pragmatic Propositional precision
Can pass on detailed information reliably (B2)
x x
Pragmatic Spoken fluency Can produce stretches of language with a fairly even tempo; although he/she can be hesitant as he/she searches for patterns and expressions, there are few noticeable long pauses. Can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without imposing strain on either party (B2)
x x x
37
ECOSTAR
App
endi
x 1
Can
-do
stat
emen
ts a
cros
s th
e le
vels
(T
rom
Bes
isi A
leph
, Tro
m B
esis
i Bet
, Bes
isi,
Mitk
adm
im A
leph
, Mitk
adm
im B
et)
Can
-dos
for
act
ivit
ies
(rec
epti
on, p
rodu
ctio
n, in
tera
ctio
n)
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
Ove
rall
read
ing
com
preh
ensi
onC
an u
nder
stan
d sh
ort,
sim
ple
text
s co
ntai
ning
th
e hi
ghes
t fre
quen
cy
voca
bula
ry, i
nclu
ding
a
prop
ortio
n of
sha
red
inte
rnat
iona
l vo
cabu
lary
item
s (A
2)
Can
und
erst
and
shor
t, si
mpl
e te
xts
on
fam
iliar
mat
ters
of
a co
ncre
te ty
pe w
hich
co
nsis
t of
high
fr
eque
ncy
ever
yday
or
job-
rela
ted
lang
uage
(A
2+)
Can
rea
d st
raig
htfo
rwar
d fa
ctua
l te
xts
on g
ener
al
subj
ects
with
a
satis
fact
ory
leve
l of
com
preh
ensi
on, i
.e.,
unde
rsta
nd m
ost m
ain
idea
s an
d su
ppor
ting
deta
ils (
adap
ted
B1)
Can
rea
d, w
ith a
larg
e de
gree
of
inde
pend
ence
, re
lativ
ely
shor
t ac
adem
ic te
xts
on
gene
ral s
ubje
cts
that
do
not
req
uire
fi
eld-
spec
ific
/exp
ert
know
ledg
e (a
dapt
ed
B2)
Can
und
erst
and
in d
etai
l le
ngth
y, c
ompl
ex te
xts
that
rel
ate
to h
is/h
er
own
area
of
spec
ialty
pr
ovid
ed th
at h
e/sh
e ca
n re
-rea
d di
ffic
ult s
ectio
ns
(ada
pted
C1)
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
Rea
ding
for
or
ient
atio
nC
an r
ecog
nize
fam
iliar
na
mes
, wor
ds a
nd v
ery
basi
c ph
rase
s on
si
mpl
e no
tices
in th
e m
ost c
omm
on
ever
yday
situ
atio
ns
(A1)
Can
find
spe
cifi
c,
pred
icta
ble
info
rmat
ion
in s
impl
e ev
eryd
ay m
ater
ial s
uch
as a
dver
tisem
ents
, pr
ospe
ctus
es, m
enus
, re
fere
nce
lists
and
tim
etab
les
(A2)
Can
sca
n/re
ad
sele
ctiv
ely
in o
rder
to
find
des
ired
in
form
atio
n (
adap
ted
B1+
)
Can
sca
n lo
nger
text
s in
ord
er to
loca
te
desi
red
info
rmat
ion,
an
d ga
ther
info
rmat
ion
from
dif
fere
nt p
arts
of
a te
xt to
ful
fill
a sp
ecif
ic ta
sk (
adap
ted
B1+
)
Can
sca
n lo
nger
text
s in
or
der
to lo
cate
des
ired
in
form
atio
n, a
nd g
athe
r in
form
atio
n fr
om
diff
eren
t par
ts o
f a
text
, or
fro
m d
iffe
rent
text
s in
ord
er to
ful
fil a
sp
ecif
ic ta
sk (
B1+
)
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
Rea
ding
for
or
ient
atio
n
C
an s
kim
to id
entif
y th
e co
nten
t and
rel
evan
ce o
f ac
adem
ic a
rtic
les
and
repo
rts
and
deci
de
whe
ther
clo
ser
read
ing
is w
orth
whi
le (
adap
ted
B2)
38
Appendix 1
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
Rea
ding
for
in
form
atio
n an
d ar
gum
ent
Can
get
an
idea
of
the
cont
ent o
f si
mpl
er
info
rmat
iona
l mat
eria
l an
d sh
ort s
impl
e de
scri
ptio
ns,
espe
cial
ly if
ther
e is
vi
sual
sup
port
(A
1)
Can
iden
tify
info
rmat
ion
in s
impl
er
wri
tten
mat
eria
l he/
she
enco
unte
rs s
uch
as
lette
rs, b
roch
ures
and
sh
ort n
ewsp
aper
ar
ticle
s de
scri
bing
ev
ents
(A
2)
Can
rec
ogni
ze
sign
ific
ant p
oint
s in
st
raig
htfo
rwar
d
artic
les
on f
amili
ar
subj
ects
(ad
apte
d B
1)
Can
iden
tify
the
mai
n co
nclu
sion
s in
cle
arly
si
gnal
ed a
rgum
enta
tive
text
s (B
1+)
Can
obt
ain
and
synt
hesi
ze in
form
atio
n,
idea
s an
d op
inio
ns f
rom
m
ultip
le s
ourc
es w
ithin
hi
s/he
r fi
eld
(ada
pted
B
2+)
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
Rea
ding
for
in
form
atio
n an
d ar
gum
ent
C
an f
ollo
w th
e m
ain
line
of a
rgum
ent i
n te
xts
that
pre
sent
is
sues
, tho
ugh
not
nece
ssar
ily in
det
ail
(ada
pted
B1+
)
Can
und
erst
and
artic
les
and
repo
rts
conc
erne
d w
ith is
sues
in w
hich
the
wri
ters
ado
pt p
artic
ular
st
ance
s or
vie
wpo
ints
(a
dapt
ed B
2)
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
Rea
ding
co
rres
pond
ence
C
an u
nder
stan
d pr
ofes
sion
al
corr
espo
nden
ce r
elat
ing
to h
is/h
er o
ccup
atio
n/fi
eld
of in
tere
st a
nd
read
ily g
rasp
the
esse
ntia
l mea
ning
(a
dapt
ed B
2)
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
Rea
ding
in
stru
ctio
ns
Can
und
erst
and
clea
rly
wri
tten,
st
raig
htfo
rwar
d in
stru
ctio
ns (
adap
ted
B1)
Can
und
erst
and
leng
thy,
co
mpl
ex in
stru
ctio
ns in
hi
s or
her
fiel
d,
prov
ided
he
or s
he c
an
re-r
ead
diff
icul
t sec
tions
(a
dapt
ed B
2)
39
ECOSTAR
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Rec
eptio
n /
Lis
teni
ngL
iste
ning
as
a m
embe
r of
a li
ve
audi
ence
Can
fol
low
in o
utlin
e st
raig
htfo
rwar
d sh
ort
talk
s on
fam
iliar
topi
cs
prov
ided
thes
e ar
e de
liver
ed in
cle
arly
ar
ticul
ated
sta
ndar
d sp
eech
(B
1)
Can
fol
low
a le
ctur
e or
ta
lk p
rovi
ded
the
subj
ect m
atte
r is
fa
mili
ar a
nd th
e pr
esen
tatio
n is
st
raig
htfo
rwar
d an
d cl
earl
y st
ruct
ured
(a
dapt
ed B
1+)
Can
fol
low
the
esse
ntia
ls o
f le
ctur
es,
talk
s an
d re
port
s an
d ot
her
form
s of
pr
esen
tatio
n w
hich
are
pr
opos
ition
ally
and
lin
guis
tical
ly c
ompl
ex
(B2)
Rec
eptio
n /
Lis
teni
ngL
iste
ning
to
anno
unce
men
ts
and
inst
ruct
ions
Can
und
erst
and
inst
ruct
ions
add
ress
ed
care
fully
and
slo
wly
to
him
/her
and
fol
low
sh
ort,
sim
ple
dire
ctio
ns (
A1)
Can
cat
ch th
e m
ain
poin
t in
shor
t, cl
ear,
sim
ple
mes
sage
s an
d an
noun
cem
ents
(A
2)
Can
fol
low
det
aile
d in
stru
ctio
ns a
nd
dire
ctio
ns (
adap
ted
B1)
Can
und
erst
and
spok
en
anno
unce
men
ts,
inst
ruct
ions
and
m
essa
ges
spok
en a
t na
tura
l spe
ed in
a
vari
ety
of s
ituat
ions
and
fo
r a
vari
ety
of p
urpo
ses
(ada
pted
B2)
Rec
eptio
n /
Lis
teni
ngL
iste
ning
to
audi
oC
an u
nder
stan
d an
d ex
trac
t the
ess
entia
l in
form
atio
n fr
om s
hort
re
cord
ed p
assa
ges
deal
ing
with
pr
edic
tabl
e ev
eryd
ay
mat
ters
that
are
de
liver
ed s
low
ly a
nd
clea
rly
(A2)
Can
und
erst
and
the
mai
n po
ints
of
radi
o ne
ws
bulle
tins
and
sim
pler
rec
orde
d m
ater
ial a
bout
fam
iliar
su
bjec
ts d
eliv
ered
re
lativ
ely
slow
ly a
nd
clea
rly
(B1)
Can
und
erst
and
the
cont
ent o
f th
e m
ajor
ity
of r
ecor
ded
or
broa
dcas
t aud
io
mat
eria
l del
iver
ed in
st
anda
rd d
iale
ct o
n to
pics
in h
is o
r he
r fi
eld,
del
iver
ed
rela
tivel
y sl
owly
and
cl
earl
y (a
dapt
ed B
1 an
d B
1+)
Can
und
erst
and
the
cont
ent o
f au
dio
reco
rdin
gs in
sta
ndar
d di
alec
t lik
ely
to b
e en
coun
tere
d in
ac
adem
ic/ p
rofe
ssio
nal
life
and
iden
tify
spea
ker
view
poin
ts (
adap
ted
B2+
)
40
Appendix 1
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Rec
eptio
n /
Lis
teni
ngL
iste
ning
to
audi
o-vi
sual
Can
fol
low
cha
nges
of
topi
c of
fac
tual
TV
ne
ws
item
s, a
nd f
orm
an
idea
of
the
mai
n co
nten
t (A
2)
Can
iden
tify
mai
n po
ints
of
TV
new
s ite
ms
repo
rtin
g ev
ents
, ac
cide
nts,
etc
. whe
re
the
visu
al s
uppo
rts
the
com
men
tary
(A
2+)
Can
und
erst
and
the
mai
n po
ints
in v
ideo
s on
fam
iliar
sub
ject
s de
liver
ed r
elat
ivel
y sl
owly
and
cle
arly
(a
dapt
ed B
1)
Can
fol
low
vid
eos
in
whi
ch v
isua
ls a
nd
actio
n ai
d un
ders
tand
ing
and
whi
ch a
re d
eliv
ered
cl
earl
y in
st
raig
htfo
rwar
d la
ngua
ge (
adap
ted
B1)
Can
und
erst
and
acad
emic
/ pro
fess
iona
l co
nten
t of
audi
o-vi
sual
s (e
.g. v
ideo
s, T
V n
ews,
cu
rren
t aff
airs
pr
ogra
ms,
and
do
cum
enta
ries
) (a
dapt
ed B
2)
Prod
uctio
n /
Wri
ting
Ove
rall
wri
tten
prod
uctio
nC
an w
rite
sim
ple,
is
olat
ed w
ords
and
ph
rase
s (a
dapt
ed A
1)
Can
wri
te s
impl
e is
olat
ed p
hras
es a
nd
sent
ence
s (A
1)
Can
wri
te a
ser
ies
of
inte
rrel
ated
sen
tenc
es
(ada
pted
A2)
Can
wri
te a
par
agra
ph
com
pris
ing
a se
ries
of
sent
ence
s lin
ked
with
ap
prop
riat
e co
nnec
tors
, suc
h as
"a
nd",
"bu
t", a
nd
"bec
ause
" (a
dapt
ed
A2)
Can
wri
te s
hort
, co
hesi
ve te
xts
on a
ra
nge
of f
amili
ar to
pics
w
ithin
his
/her
fiel
d of
in
tere
st a
nd/o
r ex
pert
ise
(ada
pted
B1)
Prod
uctio
n /
Wri
ting
Cre
ativ
e w
ritin
gC
an w
rite
sim
ple
phra
ses
and
sent
ence
s ab
out t
hem
selv
es
(ada
pted
A1)
Can
wri
te a
bout
ev
eryd
ay a
spec
ts o
f hi
s/he
r en
viro
nmen
t, e.
g. p
eopl
e, p
lace
s, a
jo
b or
stu
dy
expe
rien
ce, i
n lin
ked
sent
ence
s (A
2+)
Can
wri
te v
ery
shor
t, ba
sic
desc
ript
ions
of
even
ts, p
ast a
ctiv
ities
an
d pe
rson
al
expe
rien
ces
(A2+
)
Can
wri
te
stra
ight
forw
ard,
de
taile
d de
scri
ptio
ns o
n a
rang
e of
fam
iliar
su
bjec
ts w
ithin
his
/her
fi
eld
of in
tere
st (
B1)
41
ECOSTAR
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Prod
uctio
n /
Wri
ting
Rep
orts
and
es
says
Can
sum
mar
ize
a sh
ort
acad
emic
text
on
gene
ral s
ubje
cts
that
do
not
req
uire
fi
eld-
spec
ific
/exp
ert
know
ledg
e (n
ew)
Can
wri
te s
hort
, sim
ple
essa
ys o
n to
pics
of
inte
rest
(B
1+)
Can
sum
mar
ize
and
synt
hesi
ze f
rom
a
vari
ety
of s
ourc
es, w
rite
a
repo
rt a
nd g
ive
his/
her
opin
ion
on f
amili
ar
rout
ine
and
non-
rout
ine
mat
ters
with
in h
is/h
er
fiel
d w
ith s
ome
conf
iden
ce (
adap
ted
B1+
)
Prod
uctio
n /
Spea
king
Ove
rall
spok
en
prod
uctio
nC
an p
rodu
ce s
impl
e m
ainl
y is
olat
ed
phra
ses
abou
t peo
ple
and
plac
es (
A1)
Can
giv
e si
mpl
e de
scri
ptio
ns a
s a
shor
t se
ries
of
sim
ple
phra
ses
(ada
pted
A2)
Can
giv
e a
sim
ple
desc
ript
ion
or
pres
enta
tion
as a
sho
rt
seri
es o
f se
nten
ces
(ada
pted
A2)
Can
rea
sona
bly
flue
ntly
sus
tain
a
stra
ight
forw
ard
desc
ript
ion
of o
ne o
f a
vari
ety
of s
ubje
cts
with
in h
is/h
er fi
eld
of
inte
rest
, pre
sent
ing
it as
a li
near
seq
uenc
e of
po
ints
(B
1)
Can
giv
e cl
ear,
deta
iled
desc
ript
ions
and
pr
esen
tatio
ns o
n a
wid
e ra
nge
of s
ubje
cts
rela
ted
to h
is/h
er fi
eld
of
inte
rest
, exp
andi
ng a
nd
supp
ortin
g id
eas
with
su
bsid
iary
poi
nts
and
rele
vant
exa
mpl
es (
B2)
Prod
uctio
n /
Spea
king
Sust
aine
d m
onol
ogue
: D
escr
ibin
g ex
peri
ence
Can
des
crib
e hi
m/
hers
elf,
wha
t he/
she
does
and
whe
re h
e/sh
e liv
es (
A1)
Can
des
crib
e ev
eryd
ay
aspe
cts
of h
is/h
er
envi
ronm
ent,
e.g.
pe
ople
, pla
ces,
a jo
b or
st
udy
expe
rien
ce. C
an
give
sho
rt, b
asic
de
scri
ptio
ns o
f ev
ents
an
d ac
tiviti
es (
A2+
)
Can
exp
lain
wha
t he/
she
likes
or
disl
ikes
ab
out s
omet
hing
(A
2+)
Can
giv
e de
taile
d ac
coun
ts o
f ex
peri
ence
s,
desc
ribi
ng f
eelin
gs
and
reac
tions
, and
can
de
scri
be e
vent
s (a
dapt
ed B
1)
Can
giv
e cl
ear,
deta
iled
desc
ript
ions
on
a w
ide
rang
e of
sub
ject
s re
late
d to hi
s/he
r fi
eld
of in
tere
st
(B2)
42
Appendix 1
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Prod
uctio
n /
Spea
king
Sust
aine
d m
onol
ogue
: Pu
tting
a c
ase
(e.g
. in
a de
bate
)
Can
bri
efly
giv
e re
ason
s an
d ex
plan
atio
ns f
or
opin
ions
, pla
ns a
nd
actio
ns (
B1)
Can
dev
elop
an
argu
men
t wel
l eno
ugh
to b
e fo
llow
ed w
ithou
t di
ffic
ulty
mos
t of
the
time
(B1+
)
Can
dev
elop
a c
lear
ar
gum
ent,
expa
ndin
g an
d su
ppor
ting
his/
her
poin
ts o
f vi
ew a
t som
e le
ngth
with
sub
sidi
ary
poin
ts a
nd r
elev
ant
exam
ples
(B
2)
Prod
uctio
n /
Spea
king
Add
ress
ing
audi
ence
s
Can
giv
e a
prep
ared
st
raig
htfo
rwar
d pr
esen
tatio
n on
a
fam
iliar
topi
c w
hich
is
clea
r en
ough
to b
e fo
llow
ed w
ithou
t di
ffic
ulty
mos
t of
the
time,
and
in w
hich
the
mai
n po
ints
are
ex
plai
ned
with
re
ason
able
pre
cisi
on
(ada
pted
B1)
Can
giv
e a
clea
r, pr
epar
ed a
cade
mic
pr
esen
tatio
n, g
ivin
g re
ason
s in
sup
port
of
or
agai
nst a
par
ticul
ar
poin
t of
view
and
giv
ing
the
adva
ntag
es a
nd
disa
dvan
tage
s of
va
riou
s op
tions
(ad
apte
d B
2)
Prod
uctio
n /
Spea
king
Add
ress
ing
audi
ence
s
Can
take
a s
erie
s of
st
raig
htfo
rwar
d fo
llow
-up
ques
tions
bu
t may
hav
e to
ask
fo
r re
petit
ion
of th
e qu
estio
n(s)
(ad
apte
d B
1)
Can
take
a s
erie
s of
fo
llow
up
ques
tions
w
ith a
deg
ree
of f
luen
cy
and
spon
tane
ity th
at
pose
s no
str
ain
for
eith
er h
im/h
erse
lf o
r th
e au
dien
ce (
B2)
43
ECOSTAR
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Inte
ract
ion
/ Sp
oken
O
vera
ll sp
oken
in
tera
ctio
nC
an in
tera
ct in
a
sim
ple
way
, but
co
mm
unic
atio
n is
to
tally
dep
ende
nt o
n re
petit
ion
at a
slo
wer
ra
te o
f sp
eech
, re
phra
sing
and
rep
air.
Can
ask
and
ans
wer
si
mpl
e qu
estio
ns,
initi
ate
and
resp
ond
to
sim
ple
stat
emen
ts in
ar
eas
of im
med
iate
ne
ed o
r on
ver
y fa
mili
ar to
pics
(A
1)
Can
com
mun
icat
e in
si
mpl
e an
d ro
utin
e ta
sks
requ
irin
g a
sim
ple
and
dire
ct
exch
ange
of
info
rmat
ion
on
fam
iliar
and
rou
tine
mat
ters
to d
o w
ith
wor
k an
d fr
ee ti
me.
C
an h
andl
e ve
ry s
hort
so
cial
exc
hang
es b
ut is
ra
rely
abl
e to
un
ders
tand
eno
ugh
to
keep
con
vers
atio
n go
ing
of h
is/h
er o
wn
acco
rd (
A2)
Can
inte
ract
with
re
ason
able
eas
e in
st
ruct
ured
situ
atio
ns
and
shor
t co
nver
satio
ns,
prov
ided
the
othe
r pe
rson
hel
ps if
ne
cess
ary.
Can
m
anag
e si
mpl
e,
rout
ine
exch
ange
s w
ithou
t und
ue e
ffor
t; ca
n as
k an
d an
swer
qu
estio
ns a
nd
exch
ange
idea
s an
d in
form
atio
n on
fa
mili
ar to
pics
in
pred
icta
ble
ever
yday
si
tuat
ions
(A
2+)
Can
exp
loit
a w
ide
rang
e of
sim
ple
lang
uage
to in
tera
ct in
m
ost s
ituat
ions
. Can
ex
pres
s pe
rson
al
opin
ions
and
exc
hang
e in
form
atio
n on
topi
cs
that
are
fam
iliar
or
of
pers
onal
inte
rest
(a
dapt
ed B
1)
Can
inte
ract
with
som
e co
nfid
ence
on
fam
iliar
ro
utin
e an
d no
n-ro
utin
e m
atte
rs r
elat
ed to
his
/he
r in
tere
sts
and
prof
essi
onal
fiel
d (a
dapt
ed B
1+)
44
Appendix 1
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Inte
ract
ion
/ Sp
oken
Con
vers
atio
n
Can
mak
e an
in
trod
uctio
n an
d us
e ba
sic
gree
ting
and
leav
e-ta
king
ex
pres
sion
s. C
an a
sk
how
peo
ple
are
and
reac
t to
new
s. C
an
unde
rsta
nd e
very
day
expr
essi
ons
aim
ed a
t th
e sa
tisfa
ctio
n of
si
mpl
e ne
eds
of a
co
ncre
te ty
pe,
deliv
ered
dir
ectly
to
him
/her
in c
lear
, slo
w
and
repe
ated
spe
ech
by a
sym
path
etic
sp
eake
r (A
1)
Can
use
sim
ple
ever
yday
pol
ite f
orm
s of
gre
etin
g an
d ad
dres
s. C
an m
ake
and
resp
ond
to in
vita
tions
an
d ap
olog
ies.
Can
say
w
hat h
e/sh
e lik
es a
nd
disl
ikes
(A
2)
Can
est
ablis
h so
cial
co
ntac
t: gr
eetin
gs a
nd
fare
wel
ls,
intr
oduc
tions
, giv
ing
than
ks. C
an g
ener
ally
un
ders
tand
cle
ar,
stan
dard
spe
ech
on
fam
iliar
mat
ters
di
rect
ed a
t him
/her
, pr
ovid
ed h
e/sh
e ca
n as
k fo
r re
petit
ion
or
refo
rmul
atio
n fr
om
time
to ti
me.
Can
pa
rtic
ipat
e in
sho
rt
conv
ersa
tions
in
rout
ine
cont
exts
on
topi
cs o
f in
tere
st. C
an
expr
ess
how
he/
she
feel
s in
sim
ple
term
s,
and
expr
ess
than
ks
(A2+
)
Can
fol
low
cle
arly
ar
ticul
ated
spe
ech
dire
cted
at h
im/h
er in
ev
eryd
ay c
onve
rsat
ion,
th
ough
will
som
etim
es
have
to a
sk f
or
repe
titio
n of
par
ticul
ar
wor
ds a
nd p
hras
es.
Can
mai
ntai
n a
conv
ersa
tion
or
disc
ussi
on b
ut m
ay
som
etim
es b
e di
ffic
ult
to f
ollo
w w
hen
tryi
ng
to s
ay e
xact
ly w
hat h
e/sh
e w
ould
like
to d
o (B
1)
Can
eng
age
in e
xten
ded
conv
ersa
tion
on m
ost
gene
ral t
opic
s in
a
clea
rly
part
icip
ator
y fa
shio
n. C
an c
onve
y de
gree
s of
em
otio
n an
d hi
ghlig
ht th
e pe
rson
al
sign
ific
ance
of
even
ts
and
expe
rien
ces
(B2)
45
ECOSTAR
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Inte
ract
ion
/ Sp
oken
Info
rmat
ion
exch
ange
Can
und
erst
and
ques
tions
and
in
stru
ctio
ns a
ddre
ssed
ca
refu
lly a
nd s
low
ly to
hi
m/h
er a
nd f
ollo
w
shor
t, si
mpl
e di
rect
ions
. Can
ask
an
d an
swer
sim
ple
ques
tions
, ini
tiate
and
re
spon
d to
sim
ple
stat
emen
ts in
are
as o
f im
med
iate
nee
d or
on
very
fam
iliar
topi
cs.
Can
ask
and
ans
wer
qu
estio
ns a
bout
th
emse
lves
and
oth
er
peop
le, w
here
they
liv
e, p
eopl
e th
ey k
now
, th
ings
they
hav
e. C
an
indi
cate
tim
e by
suc
h ph
rase
s as
nex
t wee
k,
last
Fri
day,
in
Nov
embe
r, th
ree
o'cl
ock
(A1)
Can
com
mun
icat
e in
si
mpl
e an
d ro
utin
e ta
sks
requ
irin
g a
sim
ple
and
dire
ct
exch
ange
of
info
rmat
ion.
Can
ex
chan
ge li
mite
d in
form
atio
n on
fa
mili
ar a
nd r
outin
e op
erat
iona
l mat
ters
. C
an a
sk a
nd a
nsw
er
ques
tions
abo
ut w
hat
they
do
at w
ork
and
in
free
tim
e. C
an a
sk f
or
and
give
dir
ectio
ns
refe
rrin
g to
a m
ap o
r pl
an. C
an a
sk f
or a
nd
prov
ide
pers
onal
in
form
atio
n (A
2)
Can
com
mun
icat
e in
si
mpl
e an
d ro
utin
e ta
sks
requ
irin
g a
sim
ple
and
dire
ct
exch
ange
of
info
rmat
ion
(A2)
Can
find
out
and
pas
s on
str
aigh
tfor
war
d fa
ctua
l inf
orm
atio
n (B
1)
Can
exc
hang
e, c
heck
an
d co
nfir
m
accu
mul
ated
fac
tual
in
form
atio
n on
fam
iliar
ro
utin
e an
d no
n-ro
utin
e m
atte
rs in
his
/her
fiel
d w
ith s
ome
conf
iden
ce
(B1+
)
Inte
ract
ion
/ Sp
oken
Info
rmat
ion
exch
ange
C
an o
btai
n m
ore
deta
iled
info
rmat
ion
by a
skin
g qu
estio
ns
and/
or r
eque
stin
g cl
arif
icat
ion
(ada
pted
B
1)
Can
sum
mar
ize
and
give
his
/her
ow
n op
inio
n ab
out a
topi
c in
hi
s/he
r ow
n fi
eld
with
so
me
conf
iden
ce
(ada
pted
B1+
)
46
Appendix 1
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Hea
ding
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Inte
ract
ion
/ W
ritte
nO
vera
ll w
ritte
n in
tera
ctio
nC
an a
sk f
or o
r pa
ss o
n pe
rson
al d
etai
ls in
w
ritte
n fo
rm (
A1)
Can
wri
te s
hort
, si
mpl
e fo
rmul
aic
note
s re
latin
g to
mat
ters
in
area
s of
imm
edia
te
need
(A
2)
Can
ask
for
or
conv
ey
sim
ple
info
rmat
ion
of
imm
edia
te r
elev
ance
, ge
tting
acr
oss
the
poin
t he/
she
feel
s to
be
impo
rtan
t (ad
apte
d B
1)
Can
con
vey
info
rmat
ion
and
idea
s on
abs
trac
t as
wel
l as
conc
rete
topi
cs,
chec
k in
form
atio
n an
d as
k ab
out o
r ex
plai
n pr
oble
ms
with
re
ason
able
pre
cisi
on
(B1)
Inte
ract
ion
/ W
ritte
nN
otes
and
m
essa
ges
C
an ta
ke a
sho
rt
sim
ple
mes
sage
pr
ovid
ed h
e or
she
can
as
k fo
r re
petit
ion
(A2)
Can
wri
te m
essa
ges
conv
eyin
g si
mpl
e in
form
atio
n of
im
med
iate
rel
evan
ce to
te
ache
rs a
nd p
eers
, ge
tting
acr
oss
com
preh
ensi
bly
the
poin
ts h
e/sh
e fe
els
are
impo
rtan
t and
res
pond
to
suc
h m
essa
ges
in
kind
(ad
apte
d B
1)
47
ECOSTAR
Can
-dos
for
com
mun
icat
ive
stra
teg
ies
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Com
mun
icat
ive
Stra
teg
yTr
om B
esis
i A
leph
Trom
Bes
isi
Bet
Bes
isi
Mit
kadm
im
Ale
phM
itka
dmim
Bet
Rec
eptio
n /
Rea
ding
and
lis
teni
ng
Iden
tifyi
ng c
ues
and
infe
rrin
g (s
poke
n an
d w
ritte
n)
Can
use
an
idea
of
the
over
all m
eani
ng o
f sh
ort t
exts
and
ut
tera
nces
on
ever
yday
topi
cs o
f a
conc
rete
type
to
deri
ve th
e pr
obab
le
mea
ning
of
unkn
own
wor
ds f
rom
the
cont
ext (
A2)
Can
iden
tify
unfa
mili
ar w
ords
fr
om th
e co
ntex
t on
topi
cs r
elat
ed to
his
/he
r fi
eld
and
inte
rest
s.
Can
ext
rapo
late
the
mea
ning
of
occa
sion
al u
nkno
wn
wor
ds f
rom
the
cont
ext a
nd d
educ
e se
nten
ce m
eani
ng
prov
ided
the
topi
c di
scus
sed
is f
amili
ar
(B1)
Can
use
a v
arie
ty o
f st
rate
gies
to a
chie
ve
com
preh
ensi
on,
incl
udin
g lis
teni
ng f
or
mai
n po
ints
and
che
ckin
g co
mpr
ehen
sion
by
usin
g co
ntex
tual
clu
es (
B2)
Can
use
con
text
ual,
gram
mat
ical
and
lexi
cal
cues
to in
fer
attit
ude,
m
ood
and
inte
ntio
ns a
nd
antic
ipat
e w
hat w
ill c
ome
next
(ad
apte
d C
1)
Inte
ract
ion
/ Sp
oken
A
skin
g fo
r cl
arif
icat
ion
Can
ask
ver
y si
mpl
y fo
r re
petit
ion
whe
n he
/she
doe
s no
t un
ders
tand
(A
2+)
Can
ask
for
cl
arif
icat
ion
abou
t ke
y w
ords
or
phra
ses
not u
nder
stoo
d us
ing
stoc
k ph
rase
s (A
2+)
Can
ask
som
eone
to
clar
ify
or e
labo
rate
w
hat h
e or
she
has
ju
st s
aid
(B1)
Can
ask
fol
low
-up
ques
tions
to c
heck
that
he
/she
has
und
erst
ood
wha
t a s
peak
er in
tend
ed
to s
ay, a
nd g
et
clar
ific
atio
n of
am
bigu
ous
poin
ts (
B2)
Inte
ract
ion
/ Sp
oken
Com
pens
atin
g
Can
use
an
inad
equa
te w
ord
from
his
/her
re
pert
oire
and
use
ge
stur
e to
cla
rify
w
hat h
e/sh
e w
ants
to
say
(A2+
)
Can
par
aphr
ase/
can
use
a si
mpl
e w
ord
mea
ning
som
ethi
ng
sim
ilar
to th
e co
ncep
t he
/she
wan
ts to
co
nvey
and
invi
tes
"cor
rect
ion"
(ad
apte
d B
1)
Can
def
ine
the
feat
ures
of
som
ethi
ng
conc
rete
for
whi
ch
he/s
he c
anno
t re
mem
ber
the
wor
d.
Can
con
vey
mea
ning
by
qua
lifyi
ng a
wor
d m
eani
ng s
omet
hing
si
mila
r (e
.g. a
truc
k fo
r pe
ople
= b
us)
(B1+
)
Can
use
cir
cum
locu
tion
and
para
phra
se to
cov
er
gaps
in v
ocab
ular
y an
d st
ruct
ure
(B2)
48
Appendix 1
Wor
king
wit
h te
xts
Act
ivit
y /
Skill
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
Ale
phM
itka
dmim
Bet
Rea
ding
for
text
ty
pe
Can
iden
tify
a lim
ited
rang
e of
aca
dem
ic g
enre
s an
d rh
etor
ical
str
uctu
res
base
d on
the
gene
ral
feat
ures
of
the
text
and
ap
ply
appr
opri
ate
read
ing
stra
tegi
es a
nd s
kills
(ne
w)
Can
iden
tify
acad
emic
ge
nres
rel
evan
t to
his
or
her
fiel
d (e
.g. e
mpi
rica
l re
sear
ch, r
esea
rch
revi
ews,
th
eore
tical
text
s, e
tc.)
and
ad
apt r
eadi
ng s
trat
egie
s an
d sk
ills
acco
rdin
gly
whe
n na
viga
ting
the
text
(n
ew)
Med
iatio
n / N
ote-
taki
ng
Can
take
not
es a
s a
list o
f ke
y po
ints
dur
ing
a st
raig
htfo
rwar
d le
ctur
e,
prov
ided
the
topi
c is
fa
mili
ar, a
nd th
e ta
lk is
bo
th f
orm
ulat
ed in
sim
ple
lang
uage
and
del
iver
ed in
cl
earl
y ar
ticul
ated
sta
ndar
d sp
eech
(B
1)
Can
take
not
es d
urin
g a
lect
ure,
whi
ch a
re p
reci
se
enou
gh f
or h
is/h
er o
wn
use
at a
late
r da
te,
prov
ided
the
topi
c is
w
ithin
his
/her
fiel
d of
in
tere
st a
nd th
e ta
lk is
cl
ear
and
wel
l str
uctu
red
(B1+
)
Med
iatio
n /
Proc
essi
ng te
xtC
an c
opy
out s
ingl
e w
ords
an
d sh
ort t
exts
pre
sent
ed
in s
tand
ard
prin
ted
form
at
(A1)
Can
cop
y ou
t sho
rt te
xts
in
prin
ted
or c
lear
ly h
and-
wri
tten
form
at (
A2)
Can
pic
k ou
t and
re
prod
uce
key
wor
ds a
nd
phra
ses
or s
hort
sen
tenc
es
from
a s
hort
text
with
in
the
lear
ner's
lim
ited
com
pete
nce
and
expe
rien
ce (
A2+
)
Can
par
aphr
ase
shor
t w
ritte
n pa
ssag
es in
a
sim
ple
fash
ion,
usi
ng th
e or
igin
al te
xt w
ordi
ng a
nd
orde
ring
(B
1)
Can
inte
grat
e in
form
atio
n fr
om s
ever
al s
ourc
es a
nd
sum
mar
ize
them
for
so
meb
ody
else
(ad
apte
d B
1)
49
ECOSTAR
Can
-dos
for
com
mun
icat
ive
lang
uag
e co
mpe
tenc
e an
d co
mpo
nent
s
Com
mun
icat
ive
com
pete
nce
Com
pone
ntTr
om B
esis
i A
leph
Trom
Bes
isi
Bet
Bes
isi
Mit
kadm
im
Ale
phM
itka
dmim
Bet
Lin
guis
tic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eG
ener
al li
ngui
stic
ra
nge
Has
a v
ery
basi
c ra
nge
of s
impl
e ex
pres
sion
s ab
out
pers
onal
det
ails
and
ne
eds
of a
con
cret
e ty
pe (
A1)
Can
pro
duce
bri
ef
ever
yday
ex
pres
sion
s in
ord
er
to s
atis
fy s
impl
e ne
eds
of a
con
cret
e ty
pe: p
erso
nal
deta
ils, d
aily
ro
utin
es, w
ants
and
ne
eds,
req
uest
s fo
r in
form
atio
n. C
an
use
basi
c se
nten
ce
patte
rns
and
com
mun
icat
e w
ith
mem
oriz
ed p
hras
es,
grou
ps o
f a
few
w
ords
and
for
mul
ae
abou
t the
mse
lves
an
d ot
her
peop
le,
wha
t the
y do
, pl
aces
, pos
sess
ions
, et
c. H
as a
lim
ited
repe
rtoi
re o
f sh
ort
mem
oriz
ed p
hras
es
cove
ring
pre
dict
able
su
rviv
al s
ituat
ions
; fr
eque
nt
brea
kdow
ns a
nd
mis
unde
rsta
ndin
gs
occu
r in
non
-rou
tine
situ
atio
ns (
A2)
Has
a r
eper
toir
e of
ba
sic
lang
uage
, w
hich
ena
bles
him
/he
r to
dea
l with
ev
eryd
ay s
ituat
ions
w
ith p
redi
ctab
le
cont
ent,
thou
gh h
e/sh
e w
ill g
ener
ally
ha
ve to
com
prom
ise
the
mes
sage
and
se
arch
for
wor
ds
(A2+
)
Has
eno
ugh
lang
uage
to g
et b
y,
with
suf
fici
ent
voca
bula
ry to
ex
pres
s hi
m/h
erse
lf
with
som
e he
sita
tion
and
circ
umlo
cutio
ns
on to
pics
suc
h as
fa
mily
, hob
bies
and
in
tere
sts,
wor
k,
trav
el, a
nd c
urre
nt
even
ts, b
ut le
xica
l lim
itatio
ns c
ause
re
petit
ion
and
even
di
ffic
ulty
with
fo
rmul
atio
n at
tim
es
(B1)
Has
a s
uffi
cien
t ra
nge
of la
ngua
ge to
de
scri
be
unpr
edic
tabl
e si
tuat
ions
, exp
lain
th
e m
ain
poin
ts in
an
idea
or
prob
lem
w
ith r
easo
nabl
e pr
ecis
ion
and
expr
ess
thou
ghts
on
abst
ract
or
cultu
ral
topi
cs (
adap
ted
B1+
)
50
Appendix 1C
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eC
ompo
nent
Trom
Bes
isi
Ale
phTr
om B
esis
iB
etB
esis
i M
itka
dmim
A
leph
Mit
kadm
imB
et
Lin
guis
tic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eV
ocab
ular
y co
ntro
lC
an c
ontr
ol a
na
rrow
rep
erto
ire
deal
ing
with
co
ncre
te e
very
day
need
s (A
2)
Show
s go
od c
ontr
ol
of h
igh
freq
uenc
y vo
cabu
lary
but
m
ajor
err
ors
still
oc
cur
whe
n ex
pres
sing
mor
e co
mpl
ex th
ough
ts o
r ha
ndlin
g un
fam
iliar
to
pics
and
situ
atio
ns
(ada
pted
B1)
Show
s go
od c
ontr
ol
of h
igh
freq
uenc
y vo
cabu
lary
and
of
a lim
ited
repe
rtoi
re o
f lo
w f
requ
ency
vo
cabu
lary
, tho
ugh
som
e in
corr
ect w
ord
choi
ce m
ay h
inde
r co
mm
unic
atio
n (a
dapt
ed B
2)
Lex
ical
acc
urac
y is
ge
nera
lly h
igh,
th
ough
som
e co
nfus
ion
and
inco
rrec
t wor
d ch
oice
doe
s oc
cur
with
out h
inde
ring
co
mm
unic
atio
n (B
2)
Lin
guis
tic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eV
ocab
ular
y ra
nge
Has
a b
asic
vo
cabu
lary
re
pert
oire
of
isol
ated
wor
ds a
nd
phra
ses
rela
ted
to
part
icul
ar c
oncr
ete
situ
atio
ns (
A1)
Has
a s
uffi
cien
t vo
cabu
lary
for
the
expr
essi
on o
f ba
sic
com
mun
icat
ive
need
s. H
as a
su
ffic
ient
vo
cabu
lary
for
co
ping
with
sim
ple
surv
ival
nee
ds (
A2)
Has
a s
uffi
cien
t vo
cabu
lary
to
cond
uct r
outin
e,
ever
yday
tr
ansa
ctio
ns
invo
lvin
g fa
mili
ar
situ
atio
ns a
nd to
pics
(A
2+)
Has
a s
uffi
cien
t vo
cabu
lary
to
expr
ess
him
/her
self
w
ith s
ome
circ
umlo
cutio
ns o
n m
ost g
ener
al to
pics
(a
dapt
ed B
1)
Has
a g
ood
rang
e of
vo
cabu
lary
for
m
atte
rs c
onne
cted
to
his/
her
fiel
d an
d m
ost g
ener
al to
pics
. C
an v
ary
form
ulat
ion
to a
void
fr
eque
nt r
epet
ition
, bu
t lex
ical
gap
s ca
n st
ill c
ause
hes
itatio
n an
d ci
rcum
locu
tion
(B2)
Lin
guis
tic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eG
ram
mat
ical
ac
cura
cy
Show
s on
ly li
mite
d co
ntro
l of
a fe
w
sim
ple
gram
mat
ical
st
ruct
ures
and
se
nten
ce p
atte
rns
in
a le
arne
d re
pert
oire
(A
1)
Use
s so
me
sim
ple
stru
ctur
es c
orre
ctly
, bu
t stil
l sy
stem
atic
ally
m
akes
bas
ic
mis
take
s -
for
exam
ple
tend
s to
m
ix u
p te
nses
and
fo
rget
to m
ark
agre
emen
t (ad
apte
d A
2)
Use
s re
ason
ably
ac
cura
tely
a
repe
rtoi
re o
f fr
eque
ntly
use
d "r
outin
es"
and
patte
rns
asso
ciat
ed
with
mor
e pr
edic
tabl
e si
tuat
ions
(B
1)
Com
mun
icat
es w
ith
reas
onab
le a
ccur
acy
in f
amili
ar c
onte
xts;
ge
nera
lly g
ood
cont
rol t
houg
h w
ith
notic
eabl
e m
othe
r to
ngue
infl
uenc
e.
Err
ors
occu
r, bu
t it
is c
lear
wha
t he/
she
is tr
ying
to e
xpre
ss
(B1+
)
Show
s a
rela
tivel
y hi
gh d
egre
e of
gr
amm
atic
al c
ontr
ol
and
does
not
mak
e m
ista
kes
that
lead
to
mis
unde
rsta
ndin
g (B
2)
51
ECOSTAR
Com
mun
icat
ive
com
pete
nce
Com
pone
ntTr
om B
esis
i A
leph
Trom
Bes
isi
Bet
Bes
isi
Mit
kadm
im
Ale
phM
itka
dmim
Bet
Lin
guis
tic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
ePh
onol
ogic
al
cont
rol
Pron
unci
atio
n of
a
very
lim
ited
repe
rtoi
re o
f le
arne
d w
ords
and
phr
ases
ca
n be
und
erst
ood
with
gre
at e
ffor
t by
nativ
e sp
eake
rs
deal
ing
with
sp
eake
rs o
f hi
s/he
r la
ngua
ge g
roup
(a
dapt
ed A
1)
Pron
unci
atio
n of
le
arne
d w
ords
and
ph
rase
s ca
n be
un
ders
tood
with
so
me
effo
rt b
y m
ost
part
ners
(ad
apte
d A
1)
Pron
unci
atio
n is
ge
nera
lly c
lear
en
ough
to b
e un
ders
tood
des
pite
a
notic
eabl
e fo
reig
n ac
cent
, but
co
nver
satio
nal
part
ners
will
nee
d to
as
k fo
r re
petit
ion
from
tim
e to
tim
e (A
2)
Pron
unci
atio
n is
cl
earl
y in
telli
gibl
e ev
en if
a f
orei
gn
acce
nt is
som
etim
es
evid
ent a
nd
occa
sion
al
mis
pron
unci
atio
ns
occu
r (B
1)
Lin
guis
tic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eO
rtho
grap
hic
cont
rol
Can
cop
y fa
mili
ar
wor
ds a
nd s
hort
ph
rase
s, e
.g. s
impl
e si
gns
or in
stru
ctio
ns,
nam
es o
f ev
eryd
ay
obje
cts,
nam
es o
f sh
ops
and
set
phra
ses
used
re
gula
rly.
Can
spe
ll hi
s/he
r ad
dres
s,
natio
nalit
y an
d ot
her
pers
onal
det
ails
(A
1)
Can
cop
y sh
ort
sent
ence
s on
ev
eryd
ay s
ubje
cts
- e.
g. d
irec
tions
how
to
get
som
ewhe
re.
Can
wri
te w
ith
reas
onab
le p
hone
tic
accu
racy
(bu
t not
ne
cess
arily
ful
ly
stan
dard
spe
lling
) sh
ort w
ords
that
are
in
his
/her
ora
l vo
cabu
lary
(A
2)
Can
pro
duce
co
ntin
uous
wri
ting,
w
hich
is g
ener
ally
in
telli
gibl
e th
roug
hout
. Sp
ellin
g,
punc
tuat
ion
and
layo
ut a
re a
ccur
ate
enou
gh to
be
follo
wed
mos
t of
the
time
(B1)
Can
pro
duce
cle
arly
in
telli
gibl
e co
ntin
uous
wri
ting
whi
ch f
ollo
ws
stan
dard
layo
ut a
nd
para
grap
hing
co
nven
tions
. Sp
ellin
g an
d pu
nctu
atio
n ar
e re
ason
ably
acc
urat
e bu
t may
sho
w s
igns
of
mot
her
tong
ue
infl
uenc
e (B
2)
Lay
out,
para
grap
hing
and
pu
nctu
atio
n ar
e co
nsis
tent
and
he
lpfu
l. Sp
ellin
g is
ac
cura
te, a
part
fro
m
occa
sion
al s
lips
of
the
pen
(C1)
52
Appendix 1
Com
mun
icat
ive
com
pete
nce
Com
pone
ntTr
om B
esis
i A
leph
Trom
Bes
isi
Bet
Bes
isi
Mit
kadm
im
Ale
phM
itka
dmim
Bet
Soci
olin
guis
tic
com
mun
icat
ive
com
pete
nce
Soci
olin
guis
tic
appr
opri
aten
ess
Can
est
ablis
h ba
sic
soci
al c
onta
ct b
y us
ing
the
sim
ples
t ev
eryd
ay p
olite
fo
rms
of: g
reet
ings
an
d fa
rew
ells
; in
trod
uctio
ns;
sayi
ng p
leas
e, th
ank
you,
sor
ry, e
tc. (
A1)
Can
han
dle
very
sh
ort s
ocia
l ex
chan
ges,
usi
ng
ever
yday
pol
ite
form
s of
gre
etin
g an
d ad
dres
s. C
an
mak
e an
d re
spon
d to
invi
tatio
ns,
apol
ogie
s, e
tc. (
A2)
Can
soc
ializ
e si
mpl
y bu
t ef
fect
ivel
y us
ing
the
sim
ples
t com
mon
ex
pres
sion
s an
d fo
llow
ing
basi
c ro
utin
es (
A2+
)
Can
per
form
and
re
spon
d to
a w
ide
rang
e of
lang
uage
fu
nctio
ns, i
n a
neut
ral r
egis
ter.
Is
awar
e of
the
salie
nt
polit
enes
s co
nven
tions
and
act
s ap
prop
riat
ely
(B1)
Can
exp
ress
him
or
hers
elf
conf
iden
tly,
clea
rly
and
polit
ely
in f
orm
al a
nd
info
rmal
reg
iste
r, ap
prop
riat
e to
the
situ
atio
n an
d pe
rson
(s)
conc
erne
d (B
2+)
Prag
mat
ic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eT
hem
atic
de
velo
pmen
t
Can
tell
a st
ory
or
desc
ribe
som
ethi
ng
in a
sim
ple
list o
f po
ints
(A
2)
Can
rea
sona
bly
rela
te a
st
raig
htfo
rwar
d na
rrat
ive
or
desc
ript
ion
as a
lin
ear
sequ
ence
of
poin
ts (
adap
ted
B1)
Can
dev
elop
a c
lear
de
scri
ptio
n or
na
rrat
ive,
exp
andi
ng
and
supp
ortin
g hi
s/he
r m
ain
poin
ts w
ith
rele
vant
sup
port
ing
deta
il an
d ex
ampl
es
(B2)
Prag
mat
ic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eC
oher
ence
Can
link
wor
ds o
r gr
oups
of
wor
ds
with
ver
y ba
sic
linea
r co
nnec
tors
lik
e 'a
nd' o
r 'th
en'
(A1)
Can
link
gro
ups
of
wor
ds w
ith s
impl
e co
nnec
tors
like
"a
nd",
"bu
t" a
nd
"bec
ause
" (A
2)
Can
use
the
mos
t fr
eque
ntly
occ
urri
ng
conn
ecto
rs to
link
si
mpl
e se
nten
ces
in
orde
r to
tell
a st
ory
or d
escr
ibe
som
ethi
ng a
s a
sim
ple
list o
f po
ints
(A
2+)
Can
link
a s
erie
s of
sh
orte
r, di
scre
te
sim
ple
elem
ents
into
a
conn
ecte
d, li
near
se
quen
ce o
f po
ints
(B
1)
Can
use
a n
umbe
r of
co
hesi
ve d
evic
es to
lin
k hi
s/he
r ut
tera
nces
into
cle
ar,
cohe
rent
dis
cour
se,
thou
gh m
ay b
e un
even
in lo
ng
cont
ribu
tion
(ada
pted
B2)
53
ECOSTAR
Com
mun
icat
ive
com
pete
nce
Com
pone
ntTr
om B
esis
i A
leph
Trom
Bes
isi
Bet
Bes
isi
Mit
kadm
im
Ale
phM
itka
dmim
Bet
Prag
mat
ic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
ePr
opos
ition
al
prec
isio
nC
an c
omm
unic
ate
wha
t he/
she
wan
ts
to s
ay in
a s
impl
e an
d di
rect
exc
hang
e of
lim
ited
info
rmat
ion
on
fam
iliar
and
rou
tine
mat
ters
, but
in o
ther
si
tuat
ions
he/
she
gene
rally
has
to
com
prom
ise
the
mes
sage
(A
2)
Can
exp
ress
the
mai
n po
int h
e/sh
e w
ants
to m
ake
com
preh
ensi
bly
(B1)
Can
exp
lain
the
mai
n po
ints
in a
n id
ea o
r pr
oble
m
with
rea
sona
ble
prec
isio
n (B
1+)
Can
pas
s on
det
aile
d in
form
atio
n re
liabl
y.
(B2)
Prag
mat
ic c
omm
unic
ativ
e co
mpe
tenc
eSp
oken
flu
ency
Can
man
age
very
sh
ort,
isol
ated
, m
ainl
y pr
e-pa
ckag
ed
utte
ranc
es, w
ith
muc
h pa
usin
g to
se
arch
for
ex
pres
sion
s, to
ar
ticul
ate
less
fa
mili
ar w
ords
, and
to
rep
air
com
mun
icat
ion
(A1)
Can
mak
e hi
m/
hers
elf
unde
rsto
od
in s
hort
co
ntri
butio
ns, e
ven
thou
gh p
ause
s, f
alse
st
arts
and
re
form
ulat
ion
are
very
evi
dent
(A
2+)
Can
kee
p go
ing
com
preh
ensi
bly,
ev
en th
ough
pau
sing
fo
r gr
amm
atic
al a
nd
lexi
cal p
lann
ing
and
repa
ir is
ver
y ev
iden
t, es
peci
ally
in
long
er s
tret
ches
of
fre
e pr
oduc
tion
(B1)
Can
exp
ress
him
/he
rsel
f w
ith r
elat
ive
ease
. Des
pite
som
e pr
oble
ms
with
fo
rmul
atio
n re
sulti
ng in
pau
ses,
he
/she
is a
ble
to
keep
goi
ng (
adap
ted
B1+
)
Can
pro
duce
st
retc
hes
of
lang
uage
with
a
fair
ly e
ven
tem
po;
alth
ough
he/
she
can
be h
esita
nt a
s he
/she
se
arch
es f
or p
atte
rns
and
expr
essi
ons,
th
ere
are
few
no
ticea
ble
long
pa
uses
. Can
inte
ract
w
ith a
deg
ree
of
flue
ncy
and
spon
tane
ity th
at
mak
es r
egul
ar
inte
ract
ion
with
na
tive
spea
kers
qu
ite p
ossi
ble
with
out i
mpo
sing
st
rain
on
eith
er
part
y (B
2)
54
Appendix 2
Appendix 2
Additional resources
The following are links to a four part series describing the origins of the CEFR. It was recorded in 2011 to celebrate the tenth anniversary of the publication of the CEFR (CEF).
Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSJNGHDK6lM
Part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxGSQoxu6ho
Part 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbFgcT_5QI8
Part 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQSkLdCCuYc
The full Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment document (in English) can be accessed from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
The European Language Portfolio (ELP) self-assessment grids and checklists can be accessed from http://www.coe.int/en/web/portfolio
The "English Profile" for the CEFR, which provides detailed information on CEFR vocabulary and grammar scales, can be accessed from
http://www.englishprofile.org/images/pdf/eng_pro_information_booklet.pdf
Roads to Academic Reading – high frequency vocabulary can be accessed fromhttp://roadscefr.iucc.ac.il/program
ECOSTAR Independent Learning Resources:https://tempus-ecostar.iucc.ac.il/independent-learning-resources/
55
ECOSTAR
Appendix 3
Suggestions for further reading
Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern LanguageJournal, 91(4), 659-663.
Alderson, J. C. and Huhta, A. (2005). The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing, 22(3), 301-320.
Bechger, T. M., Kuijper, H., and Maris, G. (2009). Standard setting in relation to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: The case of the state Examination of Dutch as a Second Language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(2), 126 – 150.
Bonnet, G. (2007). The CEFR and education policies in Europe. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 669-672.
Davidson, F. and Fulcher, G. (2006). Flexibility is proof of a good 'Framework'. Guardian Weekly, 17 November. Available online:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/nov/17/tefl.glennfulcher.
Davidson, F. and Fulcher, G. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) and the design of language tests: A Matter of Effect. Language Teaching, 40(3), 231- 241.
Figueras, N., North, B, Takala, S., Verhelst, N. & Van Avermaet, P. (2005). Relating examinations to the Common European Framework: a manual. Language Testing, 22(3), 261-280.
Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The Common European Framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 253-266.
Hulstijn, J. A. (2007). The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 663-667.
Jones, N. and Saville, N. (2009). European Language Policy: Assessment, Learning, and the CEFR. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 51-63.
Little, D. (2005). The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22(3), 321-336.
Little, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception, and impact. Language Teaching, 39(3), 167-190.
56
Appendix 3
North, B. (1992). Options for scales of proficiency for a European Language Framework. In R. Schärer & B. North (Eds.), Toward a common European Framework for reporting language competency (pp. 9–26). Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.
North, B. (1995). The development of a common framework scale of descriptors of language proficiency based on a theory of measurement. System, 23(4), 445-465.
North, B. (2000). The development of a common framework scale of language proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.
North, B. (2004, April 15). Europe’s Framework promotes language discussion, not directives. Education Guardian. Available online:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/tefl/story/0,5500,1191130,00.html
North, B. (2007). The CEFR illustrative descriptor scales. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 656-659.
Schärer, R., & North, B. (1992). Toward a common European Framework for reporting language competency. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.
Weir, C. J. (2005). Limitations of the Common European Framework for developingcomparable examinations and tests. Language Testing, 22(3), 281-300.
Westhoff, G. (2007). Challenges and opportunities of the CEFR for reimagining foreign language pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 676-679.