ed 385 602 author norback, judith shaul; and …the final draft domain consisted of 8 major...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
, DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 385 602 TM 024 052
AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And Others
TITLE Job Analysis of the Knowledge Important for Newly
Licensed/Certified Teachers of Art. The Praxis
Series: Professional Assessments for Beginning
Teachers.
INSTITUTION Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.
REPORT NO ETS-RR-93-38
PUB DATE Jul 93
NOTE 135p.
PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143)Tests /Evaluation Instruments (160)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS Art; *Art Teachers; *Beginning Teachers; Higher
Education; Job Analysis; *Job Skills; *Knowledge Base
for Teaching; *Licensing Examinations (Professions);
Teacher Certification; Teacher Evaluation; Test
ConstructionIDENTIFIERS *Praxis Series; Subject Content Knowledge; *Test
Specifications
ABSTRACTA job analysis was conducted to determine the
knowledge important for newly certified or licensed teachers of art.
The results of this job analysis will be used to develop test
specifications for the art assessment of The Praxis Series of
Professional Assessments for Beginning Teachers and to support the
content validity of the assessment. Three successive drafts were
reviewed and revised by advisory committees comprised of art
teachers, teacher educators, and state administrators. The final
draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge
statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification through
a national survey mailed to 519 art teachers, 41 administrators, and255 college faculty for a total of 815 practicing professionals who
were asked to rate the importance of the knowledge statements. Of the
307 statements, 102 failed to meet the cutoff point for one or more
subgroups of respondents. The remaining 205 statements should be used
to develop test specifications for the assessment of knowledge for
art teachers. Six appendixes contain supplemental information and the
survey itself. Five tables present study findings. (Contains four
references.) (SLD)
*************, ******************************************************:,
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made* from the original document.***********************************************************************
![Page 2: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LU
PPV1111 visLomibiS E R I .E SProfessional Assessments for Beginning Teachers'
Job Analysis of theKnowledge Important forNewly Licensed/CertifiedTeachers of Art
Judith Shaul NorbackScott WesleyMichael RotenfeldDiane Wattay
July 1993
RR. 93-38
Educational Testing Service
U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOE e 01 Edutalional Research and Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RE SOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)
his document has been reproduced asetTed 'torn the person or organaatron
Ong.natong rtMinor changes have beer made to improvereproduclro. quality
Points of view or opinions slated in tros dot umem do nor neCeSSartly represent officialOE RI position or policy
PERMISSION 10 REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS EEN GRANTED BY
)4/ i it° /4 0 AJ
10 THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC1
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
![Page 3: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Copyright U 1993 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved.
EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE, ETS, and the ETS logo, and THE PRAXIS SERIES: PROFESSIONALASSESSMENTS FOR BEGINNING TEACHERS and its design logo are registered trademarks ofEducational Testing .%rvice.
![Page 4: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the ETS Test Development staff members Alexandra Radbil and SusanEdmunds for their help with this project. We also appreciate the assistance provided by the NationalArt Education Association (NAEA). The committee members serving in various capacities wereextremely helpful, and we would also like to express our appreciation to the teachers, teachereducators, and administrators who completed the survey. Our special thanks to Lorraine Carmosinofor her administrative support and to Rick Tannenbaum and Anne Reynolds for their suggestions andadvice.
Educational Testing Service, EfS and the us logo arc registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series l'rofessionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
![Page 5: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A Job Analysis of the Knowledge Important for Newly Licensed/CertifiedTeachers of Art
Executive Summary
J. Shaul Norback, S. Wesley, M. Rosenfeld and D. Wattay
The purpose of this study was to conduct a job analysis of the knowledge important for newlylicensed/certified teachers of art. The results of this job analysis will be used to develop specificationsfor the art assessment of The Praxis Series: Professional Assessments for Beginning Teachers TM andto support the content validity of this assessment
An initial draft domain of knowledge was constructed by Educational Testing Service (ETS) TestDevelopment staff with subject-matter expertise in art and ETS Research staff with expertise in jobanalysis. In the process of developing the draft domain, ETS subject-matter experts reviewed statelicensure/certification requirements, current test specifications, current test and relevantprofessional literature.
This draft domain was first reviewed by three consulting art teachers, all of whom had experiencein teaching a wide range of grades K through 12. After their suggested revisions were made, a seconddraft of the domain was reviewed by a ten-person external review panel consisting of educators (sixteachers, one administrator, and three teacher educators).
The third draft was reviewed by the 10 members of an Advisory/Test Development Committee.This committee was comprised of elementary, middle, and secondary school teachers (n=5), teachereducators (n=4), and a state administrator with expertise in art. This committee also hadrepresentation by race/ethnicity, sex, and geographic region. The primary purpose of the committeewas to modify the draft domain so that it accurately refle%. ed what the members of the committeebelieved were the knowledge domains important for newly licensed/certified teachers of art. Thismodification process occurred during a two-day meeting held at ETS. Some knowledge statementswere deleted, others were added, and wording changes were made in a number of the statements. Theresultant draft domain consisted of eight major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. Theeight major knowledge areas were: (1) Vocabulary of Art, (2) Content of Art, (3) Global Traditions inArt, Architecture and Design, (4) Nature of Art/Aesthetics, (5) the Criticism of Art, (6) the Making ofArt (Drawing, Painting, Printmaking, Photography, Sculpture, Communication Arts, Ceramics,Crafts/Jewelry, Fiber Arts, Newer Art Forms), (7) Documentation of Personal Art Making. and (8)Pedagogy Specific to Art.
The revised domain was placed in survey format and subjected to verification through a nationalsurvey of 815 art teachers, administrators, and college faculty from all 50 states and the District ofColumbia. This group of survey participants was selected from the membership of the National ArtEducation Association (NAEA) and through Market Data Retrieval, a survey research firm.
Educational 'resting Service, EIS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series ProfessionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational Testing Service
II
![Page 6: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The survey participants were asked to rate the knowledge statements in terms of importance fornewly licensed/certified art teachers to perform their job in a competent manner. The purpose of thesurvey administration was to: (1) confirm that the Advisory/Test Development Committee had defineduomains of knowledge important for newly licensed/certified art teachers and (2) identify a core ofimportant knowledge relevant for all newly licensed/certified art ieachers. This latter objective isaccomplished by analyzing the importance ratings by various subgroups of respondents (e.g., malesand females, racial/ethnic background, geographic region, teaching experience). Knowledge statementsthat are judged to be important by all relevant subgroups of respondents form the core knowledgestatements. This core is a primary source of information in the development of assessmentspecifications and substantially contributes to the evidence in support of the content validity of theassessment.
A cutpoint using a mean importance rating of 2.50 (the midpoint between moderately important(scale value 2) and important (scale value 3)) was established to identify the core of importantknowledge statements. Statements that were judged to be 2.50 or higher by both the total group ofsurvey respondents and all relevant subgroups of respondents constituted the core and, therefore, wereconsidered eligible for inclusion in the development of assessment specifications. (However, becausethe survey participants were not involved in the development of the knowledge domain, they may lackcertain insights that the Advisory/Test Development Committee members have due to their high levelof involvement in the definition of the domain. As a consequence, if the committee believes that aknowledge statement rated below 2.50 should be included in the specifications and the committee canprovide compelling and documented rationales, those knowledge statements may be reinstated forinclusion in the test specifications.)
The results obtained from the total group of respondents indicated that 80 of the 307 knowledgestatements (26%) failed to meet the 2.50 cutpoint for teachers and teacher educators. A total of 102statements failed to meet the 2.50 cutpoint for one or more subgroups of respondents. Most of theknowledge statements "flagged" by the subgroup analysis were also rated below the 2.50 cutpoint bythe primary respondent group, but 24 additional statements were identified as judged below the 2.50cutpoint by one or more subgroups of respondents.
The results of the job analysis study identified 205 knowledge statements (67%) judged to beimportant for newly licensed/certified art teachers by the diversity of educational professionalsresponding to the job analysis survey.
Educational Testing Service ITS and the ITS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service Tne Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are tradematks of Educational Testing Service
![Page 7: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
Executive Summary ii
List of Tables vi
Introduction 1
Method 1
Definition of the Knowledge Domain 2
Building an initial draft knowledge domain 2
Advisory/Test Development Committee meeting 2
Large-Scale Survey 3
Survey instrument 3
Survey participants 3
Pilot test 4
Survey administration 4
Results 4
Data Analyses 4
Criterion for Interpretation of Mean Importance Ratings 4
Survey Respondents: 5
Response rate 5
Demographic characteristics 5
Mean Importance Ratings of the Eight Knowledge Areas 5
Mean Importance Ratings of Knowledge Statements 6
Subgroup Analyses 7
Mean importance ratings 7
Correlations of the profiles of mean importance ratings 13
Content Coverage 14
Summary 15
References 17
Educational Testing Service, ETS and the ETS logo arc registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational Testing Service
iv
![Page 8: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
Appendix E:
Appendix F:
Subject-Matter Experts A I
Job Analysis Survey B I
Survey Cover Letter C I
Demographic Distributions D1
Importance Ratings for Teachers and College Faculty E I
Importance Ratings for Demographic Subgroups F I
Educational 'I ecting,Service. ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational 'testing Sersi,c I he Praxis Soles Prolessional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational 'testing Service
![Page 9: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Tables
Table 1: Mean Importance Ratings of the Eight Knowledge Areas 6
Table 2: Mean Importance Ratings of Knowledge Statements Rated Less Than 2.50by Teachers and/or Teacher Educators 8
Table 3: Mean Importance Ratings of Knowledge Statements Rated Less Than 2.50 bySubgroups of Respondents 12
Table 4: Correlations of the Profile of Mean Importance Ratings by Subgroup 14
Table 5: Mean Ratings of Content Coverage 15
Educational Testing Service, ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series Professional
Assestments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational Testing Service
vi
![Page 10: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
A Job Analysis of the Knowledge Important forNewly Licensed/ Certified Teachers of Art
IntroductiOn
The subject assessments for The Praxis Series: Professional Assessments for BeginningTeachers TM are designed to assess a prospective teacher's content knowledge of a specific subjectarea. The series will be used by various states as part of their teacher licensure /certification process.Included as part of the subject assessments is an art education assessment. This report will describethe job analysis conducted to identify the content domain and to support the content validity of thisassessment. The goal was to identify the knowledge important for newly licensed/certified arteducation teachers.
The use of job analysis to define the content domain is a critical component in establishing thecontent validity of licensure and certification examinations. The Standards for Educational andPsychological Testing (AERA, APA, & NCME, 1985) is a comprehensive technical guide thatprovides criteria for the evaluation of tests, testing practices, and the effects of test use. They state:
The content domain to be covered by a licensure or certification test should be defined clearly andexplained in terms of the importance of the content for competent performance in an occupation...Job analyses provide the primary basis for defining the content domain (p. 64).
Content validity is the principal. validation strategy used for licensing and certification exams. Itrefers to the extent to which the domain covered by the examination overlaps with the importantknowledge necessary to perform a given.job competently. Demonstration of content validity isaccomplished through the judgments of subject-matter experts. It is enhanced by the inclusion of largenumbers of subject-matter experts who represent the diversity of the relevant areas of expertise(Ghiselli, Campbell, & Zedeck, 1981). The job analysis conducted for art education was designed tobe consistent with the Standards and current professional practices.
Method
The job analysis study described in this report involved a multi-method approach that includedsubject-matter experts and a national survey. In overview, groups of subject-matter experts firstdefined a knowledge domain important for newly licensed/certified art education teachers. Thisknowledge domain was then sent out to art education professionals through a large-scale survey. Thepurpose of the survey administration was to: (1) obtain verification from large numbers of arteducation professionals that the subject-matter experts had defined a domain of knowledge importantfor art teachers and (2) identify a core of important knowledge relevant for all newly litensed/certifiedart teachers. The use of a job analysis survey is an efficient and cost-effective method of obtaininginput from large numbers of subject-matter experts and enables*the importance ratings to be analyzedby relevant subgroups. Both of these facets of survey methodology contribute to the support of thecontent validity of the assessment.
Educational 'resting Sery Ice. k I's and the U rs logo are registered trademarks of Educational 'I esting Service I he Prakis Series BroressionalAssessments lbr Beginning Teachers and its demo logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Sem ice
1
0
![Page 11: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The survey participants were art teachers, administrators, and college faculty, whose names wereobtained from the membership of the National Art Education Association. (NAEA) and Market Data
Retrieval, a survey research organization. The participants were asked to rate the knowledge in termsof importance for newly licensed/certified art education teachers to perform their jobs in a competentmanner. The specific steps in the job analysis process are described below.
Definition of the Knowledge Domain
Building an initial draft knowledge domain. The first step in the process of conducting the job
analysis was to construct a preliminary knowledge domain. The domain was constructed byEducational Testing Service (ETS) Test Development staff with subject-matter expertise in art, and
ETS Research staff with expertise in job analysis. In the process of developing the draft, the ETSsubject-matter experts reviewed state licensure/certification requirements, current test specifications,
current test items, relevant professional literature, and information provided by the National ArtEducation Association. Three art teaching consultants reviewed and suggested modifications to thisinitial draft. The next step involved mailing the draft to an external review panel, who were asked toreview the second draft. Their comments were obtained through telephone interviews. (Members ofboth panels are listed in Appendix A.) The value of these panels of experts was that independentsubject-matter expertise was included early in the job analysis process. The experts had an
opportunity to shape and define the knowledge domain.
Following the completion of the above steps, the resultant domain for art education consisted offive major knowledge areas and 260 specific knowledge statements. The five major knowledge areas
were: ( I) Art History, Culture and Heritage, (2) Artistic Concepts, (3) Art Forms, (4) AestheticConcepts, (5) Pedagogy Specific to Art Education.
Advisory/Test Development Committee meeting. The draft domain was then mailed to membersof an external Advisory/Test Development Committee. The 10 committee members assembled wereall knowledgeable in art and art education and were also selected to represent a number of importantcharacteristics including gender, racial/ethnic background and geographical areas. The committee wascomprised of elementary, middle, and secondary school teachers (N=5), teacher educators (N=4), and a
state administrator with expertise in art. (see Appendix A for list of members). The purpose of thiscommittee was to review the draft domain in terms of its overall structure (i.e., whether the majorknowledge areas adequately defined the important components of the knowledge domain),completeness, appropriateness of the knowledge statements, and clarity of wording. In addition, themembers were asked to identify other knowledge that they believed should be added to the domainand to delete knowledge that they believed should not be included in the domain. The committee alsoreviewed and approved the rating scales for the national survey and the biographical data questionsthat would be asked of the survey participants. The biographical data were collected to describe thecomposition of the survey respondents and to permit analysis of the survey responses by varioussubgroups of respondents (e.g., males and females, racial/ethnic background, geographical region).
The revision process occurred during two days of a four-day Test Development meeting held inPrinceton, :,:ew Jersey. The meeting was led jointly by ETS Test Development and Research staff.
(Prior to the meeting, the members of the committee were mailed a copy of the draft domain to
Educational I esting Service, FFS and the ElS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service .1 he Praxis Series Piotessional
Assessin"nts for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
2
11
![Page 12: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
review. They were informed about the purpose of the meeting and asked to come prepared to discusstheir review of the draft domain.) During the course of the meeting, the domain was revised to reflectthe consensus of the committee. Some knowledge statements were deleted, others were added, andwording changes were made in many of the statements.
The revised knowledge domain for art increased from five to eight major knowledge areas. Thenumber of knowledge statements was increased from 260 to 307. The eight major knowledge areaswere: (1) Vocabulary of Art, (2) Nature of Art/Aesthetics, (3) Content of Art, (4) The Making of Art,(5) The Criticism of Art, (6) Global Traditions in Art, Architecture, and Design, (7) Documentation ofPersonal Art Making, (8) Pedagogy Specific to Art.
Large-Scale Survey
Survey instrument. The survey (see Appendix B for a copy of the survey) consisted of two parts.Part I included the eight major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. Also for each majorknowledge area in Part I there was a. content coverage question. This question asked the surveyparticipants to indicate, using a five-point rating scale, how well each major knowledge area wascovered by, the specific knowledge statements. The participants also had an opportunity to identifyknowledge that they believed should be added to the domain. The knowledge statements were judgedusing an importance rating scale:
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art education teachers,regardless of the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(I) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
This scale is consistent with the Standards emphasis on identifying a content domain that isimportant for competent job performance. The scale was also reviewed and approved by theAdvisory/Test Development Committee.
Part Ii of the survey asked the participants for background information to be used to describe therespondents and to perform necessary subgroup analyses. These subgroup analyses will be describedin the results section of this paper.
Survey participants. The job analysis survey, accompanied by a letter of invitation to participate(see Appendix C for a copy of the letter), was mailed to a group of 815 practicing professionals in arteducation: (1) 519 art teachers, (2) 41 administrators, and (3) 255 college faculty. The followingguidelines were used to make the selection: (1) approximately 10 art teachers per state plus theDistrict of Columbia (some states had fewer than 10 available, some had many more than 10available), (2) one administrator per state (plus the District of Columbia) for states which had an artadministrator, (3) five college faculty per state plus the District of Columbia. These individuals were
Educational Testing Sim Ice, Ifs and the us logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Sell ice 'I he Praxis Series Piofessional
Assessments for Begmning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
3
12
1
![Page 13: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
selected from the membership of the National Art Education Association, which is the majorprofessional organization of art teachers, administrators, and college faculty, and from Market DataRetrieval.
Pilot test. Prior to the large-scale administration, the survey was mailed to a small group (N=10)of art teachers and teacher educators. (See Appendix A for a list of participants.) These pilot-testparticipants were asked to review the survey for clarity of wording and instruction, ease of use, andcomprehensiveness of content coverage. Their comments were obtained through telephone interviews.The arrangement of the conttait areas was revised, based on their comments, but no additionalknowledge areas were added.
Survey administration. The surveys were administered to the group in July, 1992. Each surveywas accompanied by a letter of invitation to participate and a postage-paid envelope for return of thecompleted instrument. A reminder postcard was mailed approximately one week after each initialmailing.
Results
Data Analyses
Mean importance ratings were computed for each of the knowledge statements for teachers andcollege faculty in the group of respondents. Due to the small number of administrators who respondedto the survey (school administrators, n=7; state administrators, n=18), mean analyses were notconducted for these groups.
Analysis of mean importance ratings by subgroups of respondents was also conducted. Thisanalysis is used to identify a core of knowledge that all relevant subgroups agree is important fornewly licensed/certified art teachers. Means were computed for only those relevant subgroupcategories that had at least 30 respondents. This minimum number is necessary to ensure an accurateestimate of the population mean (Walpole, 1974). The subgroup agreement is necessary to ensure thatthe content of the assessment is relevant to a wide range of candidates. This represents an absolutemeasure of agreement because it is based on the magnitude of the mean ratings. Correlationcoefficients of the profile of mean importance ratings were also computed by the relevant subgroups ofrespondents. This analysis provides information about the extent to which the subgroups agree on therelative importance of the knowledge. It describes the similarity in the pattern of the mean ratings.Similar patterns indicate that there is agreement in the ratings of relative importance. Results thatsupport both absolute and relative subgroup agreement provide substantial evidence in support ofcontent validity.
Criterion for Interpretation of Mean Importance Ratings
Since one of the goals of establishing content validity is to ensure that only the more importantknowledge statements are included in the development of assessment specifications, it is useful toestablish a criterion (cutpoint) for inclusion. A reasonable criterion that has been used in a similar jobanalysis study (cf. Rosenfeld & Tannenbaum, 1991) is a mean importance rating that represents the
Educational Testing Service. ETS and the ETS logo arc registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
4
![Page 14: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
midpoint between moderately important and important. For the importance rating scale used inpresent job analysis, the value of this criterion is 2.50. It is believed that this criterion is consistentwith the intent of ccntent validity, which is to include important knowledge in the assessment measureand to exclude unimportant knowledge from the assessment measure. Therefore, knowledgestatements that receive a mean importance rating of 2.50 or higher may be considered eligible forinclusion in the development of assessment specifications; knowledge statements that receive a meanrating of less than 2.50 may not be considered for inclusion. (However, because survey participantswere not involved in the development of the knowledge domain, they may lack certain insights thatthe Advisory/Test Development Committee members have due to their high level of involvement in
the definition of the domain. As a consequence, if the committee believes that a knowledge statementrated below 2.50 should be included in the specifications and if the committee can provide compellingand documented rationales, those knowledge statements may be reinstated for incluL'on in theassessment specifications.)
Survey Respondents
Response rate. Of the 815 surveys mailed, 20 were returned due to an invalid mailing address.Thus, 795 surveys were actually administered. Of these, 232 were returned. This represents aresponse rate of 29%. For mail surveys of this type, a 29% response rate is considered respectable.
Demographic characteristics. Sixty-two percent of the respondents were between the ages of 35years and 54 years. Fifty-seven percent were female, and 37% were male. The majority ofrespondents (84%) were White. Almost 70% had 11 or more years of teaching experience in art.Fifteen percent were currently teaching at the elementary school level only; 5% were teaching at theelementary and middle school level; 8% were teaching at the middle school level only; 9% wereteaching at the middle school and secondary school level; 13% were teaching at the secondary schoollevel only; and 31% were teacher educators. A complete breakdown of the demographiccharacteristics of the respondents is provided in Appendix D.
Mean Importance Ratings of the Eight Knowledge Areas
Respondents were asked to give an overall rating of importance for each of the eight knowledgeareas. The means for the teachers and college faculty are presented in Table 1. The areas of theMaking of Art and Pedagogy Specific to Art received the highest mean importance ratings by eachgroup, while the Nature of Art/Aesthetics and the Criticism of Art received the lowest overallimportance ratings. Within the area of the Making of Art, a total of ten categories were included. Ofthese categories, Drawing, Painting and Ceramics received the highest mean importance ratings byeach group, while Photography and Crafts/Jewelry received the lowest overall importance ratings.
Educational Testing Service. l'. TS and the EFS logo ate registered trademarks of Educational resting Service the Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning 'leachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
5
14
![Page 15: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Table IMean Importance Ratings of the Eight Knowledge Areas
MAJOR KNOWLEDGE AREASTEACHERS
TEACHEREDUCATORS
MEAN MEAN
Vocabulary of Art 3.34 3.46
Content of Art 2.92 3.28
Global Traditions in Art, Architecture, and Design 3.21 3.24
Nature of Art/Aesthetics 2.90 2.98
The Criticism of Art 2.99 2.98
The Making of Art 3.62 3.56
Drawing 3.76 3.67
Painting 3.51 3.55
Printmaking 3.24 3.27
Photography 2.65 2.91
Sculpture 3.37 3.43
Communication Arts (Technology/Media) 3.01 2.97
Ceramics 3.47 3.44
Crafts/Jewelry 2.55 2.60
Fiber Arts 2.83 2.80
Documentation of Personal Art Making 3.35 3.34
Pedagogy Specific to Art 3.46 3.58
Mean Importance Ratings of Knowledge Statements
The mean importance rating and standard deviation for each of the knowledge statements isprovided in Appendix E. The means are presented for teachers (n=143) and teacher educators (n=71).(Only 11 surveys were returned from school and/or state administrators; thus, analyses were notconducted on these groups.) As previously discussed, knowledge statements that received a meanimportance rating of less than 2.50 (midpoint between moderately important and important) may notbe considered for inclusion in the development of assessment specifications, unless a compelling anddocumented rationale is provided by the committee for its reinstatement. Those knowledge statementsrated less than 2.50 by either the teachers or teacher educators are presented in Table 2. Of the 307individual knowledge statements, 80 (26%) were rated below 2.50 by at least one of these two groups.Of the 80 statements that were below the cutpoint, 13 were in the area of Global Traditions in Art,Architecture, and Design, one was in the area of the Nature of Art/Aesthetics, 65 were in the area ofthe Making of Art (four in Drawing, five in Painting, none in Printmaking, one in Photography, four
Educational Testing Service, ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational 'resting Service The Praxis Series. ProfessionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
6
15
![Page 16: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
in Sculpture, eight in Communication Arts (Technology/Media), two in Ceramics, 29 inCrafts/Jewelry, eight in Fiber Arts, and four in Newer Art Forms), and one was in the area ofDocumentation of Personal Art Making. All statements in the Vocabulary of Art, Content of Art, andPedagogy Specific to Art areas were above- the cutpoint.
Subgroup Analyses
Mean importance ratings. It is important for the documentation of content validity that the contentof the art assessment be verified by a diverse group of art professionals. Therefore, mean importanceratings for each knowledge statement were computed for the following subgroups of respondP-its: (1)sex; (2) geographic region (Northeast, Central, South, Far West); (3) teaching experience (1s than orequal to 10 years, greater than 10 years). The means are presented in Appendix F. The fourgeographic regions included for analysis are consistent with the categorization established by theNational Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (NASDTEC). Thedichotomous breakdown of teaching experience at the 10-year point was chosen so that the judgmentsof less experienced and more experienced teachers would be represented.
The results of the subgroup analysis are presented in Appendix F. The 102 shaded knowledgestatements represent ratings below the 2.50 cutpoint by one or more subgroups. In addition to the 80statements identified by the mean analysis conducted on teachers and teacher educators, another 24statements were judged below the 2.50 cutpoint. They are listed in Table 3. A total, then, of 102knowledge areas shown in Tables 2 and 3 were rated as below 2.50 either by teachers, teachereducators, or at least one of the subgroups.
Educational Testing Service, firs and the firs logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational Testing Service
7
![Page 17: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Table 2Mean Importance Ratings of Knowledge Statements Rated Less than 2.50 by Teachers and/orTeacher Educators
TEACHERS TEACHER EDUCATORSN = 143 N = 71
Mean Mean
GLOBAL TRADITIONS IN ART, ARCHITECTURE, AND DESIGN
A. Historical Analysis
Use of primary and secondary sources (e.g., artists' autobiographies andbiographies, diaries)
Impact of external force on art and culture:
2.40 2.41
Colonialism and other forms of domination 2.20 2.39
Gender discrimination 2.39
B. Periods, Themes, Styles & Movement, within GlobalTraditions of Art, Design and Crafts
Africa
Ancient art of the sub-Sahara (e.g., rock art, early animist traditions, Nok 2.36 2.33
Culture)
10 century A.D. to the present (e.g., the Akan, Yoruba, Benin, continuation ofanimist traditions)
2.27 2.47
The Americas
l're-Columbian, Mexico to Peru2.48
Asia/Oceania
The Indian subcontinent (Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic traditions, e.g., insculpture, temple architecture, miniature painting)
2.22 2.47
China (indigenous traditions, Buddhist influence, e.g., in sculpture, ceramics,scroll painting)
2.33
Southeast Asia (adaptations of Buddhist traditions, e.g., in temple architecture) 2.16 2.43
Korea and Japan (indigenous traditions and influence of China, e.g., ceramics,bronzes, ink painting, woodblock prints) 2.48
Asian tblk art 2.16
Pacific Island cultures and Australia 2.18 2.25
Educational Testing Service. ITS and the IFS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series ProfessionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service.
8
17
![Page 18: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Table 2 (cont'd.)
TEACHERSN =143
Mean
TEACHER EDUCATORS.N = 71Mean
Global Traditions (cont'd.)
Europe and the Near East
Islamic (e.g., rise of the non-figurative tradition, Moorish influences in Spain) 2.31
NATURE-OF ART /AESTHETICS
Aesthetics (identify, interpret, and apply widely known theories of aesthetics,e.g., theories of Rudolph Arnheim, Suzanne Langer,Harry S. Broudy, Karl Marx) 2.09
THE MAKING OF ART
Drawing
Erasers 2.37Scratchboard 2.28Cartooning 2.19Mechanical drawing 2.46 1.92
Painting
Air brush 2.33 2.18Fresco 2.09 1.76Egg Tempera 2.10 1.85
Encaustic 2.30 1.97
Impasto 2.33
Photography
Manipulative (e.g., hand coloring, multiple negative) 2.31
Sculpture
Performance 2.47 2.34Stone 2.29Metals 2.44Plastics 2.46
Communication Arts (Technology/Media)
Package design 2.48Film 2.48Electronic transmission (e.g., fax, laser disc, modems) 2.34 2.42Laser disc 2.35 2.24Modem 2.42 2.13Scanner 2.31 2.37Photostats 2.30 2.16
Educational Testing Service, EIS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series ProfessionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
9
18
![Page 19: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Table 2 (cont'd.)
TEACHERSN = 143
Mean
TEACHER EDUCATORSN = 71Mean
THE MAKING OF ART (cont'd.)
Communication Arts (Technology/Media) (cont'd)
Editing 2.47
Ceramics
Tiles 2.46
Mold 2.45
Crafts/Jewelry.
Types
Stained glass 2.22 2.08
Mosaic 2.30
Papermaking 2.45
Metal jewelry 2.35 2.33
Ceramic jewelry 2.17
Plastic jewelry 2.26 1.88
Paper jewelry 2.40 2.09
Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment
Plastic 2.33 2.23
Enamels 2.49 2.23
Torches 2.33
Casting machine 2.19 2.18
Soldering iron 2.38 2.39
Solder 2.40 2.45
Glass cutter 2.32 2.17
Pug mill 2.22 2.35
Electric blender 2.28 2.39
Tile cutter 2.18 1.99
Deckle 2.09 2.06
Felts 2.28 2.21
Techniques and Processes
Fabrication 2.41
Scrimshaw 2.07 1.71
Enameling 2.29 2.09
Scratlito 2.25 2.29
Annealing 2.23 2.27
Sawing 2.33
Piercing 2.30
Soldering 2.35
Casting 2.33 2.32
Lamination 2.23 2.35
Educational Testing Service, ETS and the ETS logo arc registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
10
19
![Page 20: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Table 2 (coned.)
TEACHERS TEACHER EDUCATORSN = 143 N = 71
Mean Mean
THE MAKING OF ART (coned.)
Fiber Arts
Wax 2.45Tjanting tools 2.44 2.27Sewing machine 2.26 2.32Mold and deckle 2.23 2.20Applique 2.46
, Macrame 2.38 2.14Quilting 2.38 2.14Basketry 2.47 2.29
Newer Art Forms
Performance 2.28 2.40Installation 2.29 2.42Environmental (earthworks, site works) 2.31 2.42Overall evaluation of the importance of Newer Art Forms 2.44
DOCUMENTATION OF PERSONAL ART MAKING
Newer art forms (e.g., performance, installation) 2.47 2.44
Educational Testing Service, ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series- ProfessionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
11
0
![Page 21: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Table 3
Mean Importance Ratings of Knowledge Statements Rated Less than 2.50 by Subgroups ofRespondents
Knowledge AreaNumber Description
28 Global Traditions: Periods: European-influenced traditions in Mexico,Central America and South America
65 The Criticism of Art: Describe the role and function of the art critic
85 The Making of Art: Drawing: Use of Tools, Media and Materials:fixatives/solvents
93 The Making of Art: Drawing: Techniques or Methods: computer drawing
117 The Making of Art: Printmaking: Use of Techniques, Methods, Materials,and Equipment: baren
129 The Making of Art: Printmaking: Techniques and Methods: lithography
130 The Making of Art: Printmaking: Techniques and Methods: intaglio
145 The Making of Art: Sculpture: Types: puppetry
146 The Making of Art: Sculpture: Types: performance
148 The Making of Art: Sculpture: Types: installation
183 The Making of Art: Communication Arts: Use of Tools, Media/Materialsand Equipment: triangle
198 The Making of Art: Communication Arts: Techniques and Processes:paste up/mechanicals
217 The Making of Art: Ceramics: Techniques and Processes: casting
229 The Making of Art: Crafts/Jewelry: Use of Tools, Materials, andEquipment: metal (e.g., copper, silver)
Educational Testing Service, ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational Testing Service
12
21
![Page 22: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Table 3 (cont'd.)
Knowledge AreaNumber Description
235 The Making of Art:
237 The Making of Art:files
sawCrafts/Jewelry: Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment:
Crafts/Jewelry: Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment:
260 The Making of Art: Fiber Arts: Types: cast (e.g., paper making)
261 The Making of Art: Fiber Arts: Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment:loom
262 The Making of Art: Fiber Arts: Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment:yarns
265 The Making of Art: Fiber Arts: Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment:fabric paint
266 The Making of Art: Fiber Arts: Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment:fabrics (e.g., silk, cotton)
271 The Making of Art: Fiber Arts: Techniques and Processes: stitchery
272 The Making of Art: Fiber Art: Techniques and Processes: tie dye
279 The Making of Art: Fiber Art: Techniques and Processes: paper making
Correlations of the profiles of mean importance ratings. Correlation coefficients were computedfor the profiles of mean importance ratings for the subgroups within the group of respondents. Thecoefficients are presented in Table 4. All values exceed .90, indicating a very high level of relativeagreement between the subgroups of respondents: teachers and teacher educators, males and females,respondents from various geographical areas, and teachers with more than 10 years experience and lessexperienced teachers.
Educational Testing Scrvicc, ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series ProfessionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service.
13
![Page 23: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Table 4
Correlations of the Profile of Mean Importance Ratings by Subgroup
1. 2. 3.
Current Employment Status
1. Teachers
2. Teacher Educators .92
Sex
1. Female
2. Male .94
Geographic Region
1. Northeast
2. Central .95
3. Southern .96 .95
4. Far West .93 .96 .94
Teaching Experience
(teachers only)
1. 10 years or less
2. More than 10 years .95
Content Coverage
To determine the adequacy of the survey's content domain coverage, respondents were asked tojudge how well the survey covered each major knowledge area. These judgments were obtained usinga 5-point rating scale that ranged from a low of 1 (very poorly) to a high of 5 (very well). The meanratings for each area are presented in Table 5. All the mean ratings were close to or exceeded 4.00.This indicates that all the major knowledge areas were judged to have been well covered.
Educatith resting Service, ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service. The Praxis Series Professional
Assessment 1r Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational Testing Service.
14
23
![Page 24: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Table 5
Mean Ratings of Content Coverage
Teac hers College Faculty
CONTENT AREA Mean SD Mean SD
Vocabulary of art 4.03 0.81 4.13 0.68
Content of art 3.50 0.88 3.72 0.76
Global traditions in art,architecture, and design 4.17 0.78 4.20 0.79
Nature of art/aesthetics 3.75 0.79 4.02 0.76
The criticism of art 3.92 0.87 3.82 0.80
The making of art 4.33 0.73 4.30 0.78
Documentation of personalart making 4.15 0.78 4.03 0.81
Pedagogy specific to art 4.22 0.74 4.21 0.75
Summary
A job analysis was conducted to define a knowledge domain important for newly licensed/certified art teachers to perform their jobs in a competent manner. The results of the job analysis willbe used to develop specifications for the art assessment that will be included as part of the subjectassessments of The Praxis Series: Professional Assessments for Beginning Teachers TM.
An initial draft domain of important knowledge was constructed by ETS Test Development staffwith expertise in art and ETS Research staff with expertise in job analysis. This draft domain wasthen reviewed, modified, and approved by several art education consultants and by an externalAdvisory/Test Development Committee. The revised knowledge domain was then subjected toverification through the use of a large-scale, national survey of art teachers, administrators, and collegefaculty. The survey participants were asked to rate the specific knowledge statements of the domainusing a 5-point importance scale. A cutpoint of 2.50 (midpoint between moderately important andimportant) was established to differentiate between important and unimportant knowledge statements.Knowledge statements that received a mean importance rating of 2.50 or higher were consideredimportant and, therefore, eligible for inclusion in the development of assessment specifications:knowledge statements that received a mean rating of less than 2.50 were considered unimportant and,therefore, not eligible. (However, because survey participants were not involved in the developmentof the knowledge domain and, consequently, may lack certain insights that the Advisory/Test
Educational Testing Service, HS and the ETS logo arc registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series ProlCssionalAssessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
15
24
![Page 25: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Development Committee members have due to their high level of involvement in the definition of thedomain, a knowledge statement rated below 2.50 could be reinstated for inclusion, if accompanied bycompelling and documented rationales provided by the committee.)
Eighty, of the 307 knowledge statements were rated less than 2.50 by teachers and teachereducators from the primary group of survey respondents. This represents approximately 26% of theknowledge domain. The subgroup analysis revealed a total of 102 knowledge statements rated belowthe 2.50 criterion. In addition to the 80 statements identified by the mean analysis conducted onteachers and teacher educators, another 24 statements were judged below the 2.50 cutpoint.
The computation of correlation coefficients to assess subgroup agreement in terms of perceivedrelative importance of the knowledge statements revealed a very high level of agreement. Thecoefficients generated by the subgroup analyses all exceeded .90. This finding, coupled with theoutcome of the mean analysis, indicate that there is substantial agreement in the importance ratingsacross the diversity of art education professionals.
In summary, the results of the study identified 205 knowledge statements judged to be importantfor newly licensed (certified) art teachers by the diversity of educational professionals responding tothe job analysis survey.
Educational 'resting Service, ETS and the ETS logo are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service. The Praxis Series. Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo are trademarks of Educational Testing Service
16
25
![Page 26: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & NationalCouncil on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychologicaltesting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P.. & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioralsciences. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Rosenfeld, M., & Tannenbaum, R. J. (1991). Identification of a core of important enabling skills forthe NTE Successor Stage I examination (RR-91-37). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Walpole, R.E. (1974). Introduction to statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Educational Testing Service, ETS and the ETS logo arc registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service The Praxis Series Professional
Assessments for Beginning Teachers and its design logo arc trademarks of Educational Testing Service
17
2 6'
![Page 27: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Appendix A
Subject-Matter Experts
Al
27
![Page 28: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
James ClarkeAldine School District14910 Aldine - Westfield RoadHouston, TX 77032
Dr. Robert O'BoyleHopewell Valley Central High SchoolPennington-Titusville RoadPennington, NJ 08534
Donald ProffitLawrence Schools2455 Princeton. PikeLawrenceville, NJ 08648
Walter AskinP.O. Box 50381Pasadena, CA 91115-0381
Lyn DodsonMt. Olive Township Public SchoolsMorris County, NJ 07828
Richard DoornekMilwaukee Public SchoolsArt OfficeP.O. Drawer 10KMilwaukee, WI 53201-8210
Nelle D. ElamStarkville High SchoolYellow Jacket DriveStarkville, MS 39759
Doris Emerson5608 Gwyndale AvenueBaltimore, MD 21207
Consultants
External Review Panel
A3
28
![Page 29: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
MacArthur GoodwinP.O. Box 21791Columbia, SC 29221
Norman E. PendergraftNorth Carolina Central UniversityNCCU Art MuseumP.O. Box 19555Durham, NC 27707
Denise PurcellLansdowne Middle School2400 Lansdowne RoadBaltimore, MD 21227
John TorresTorres School of Sculpture8425 Glazebrook AvenueRichmond, VA 23228
Linda P. WilsonBaltimore County Public SchoolsOffice of Art825 Providence RoadTowson, MD 21204
Advisory/Test Development Committee Members
Elementary School Teachers
Vicki S. BodenhamerHattiesburg Public SchoolsP.O. Box 1569Hattiesburg, MS 39401
Dr. Timothy Y. CherryWake Forrest Elementary SchoolWake Forrest, NC 27587
A4
29
![Page 30: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Middle School Teachers
Jean M. DelaneyBaltimore City Public SchoolsBaltimore, MD 21014
Secondary School Teachers
William JerdonArt DepartmentCleveland Heights High School263 Cedar RoadCleveland Heights, OH 44118
Ms. Karen PricePittsburgh Public SchoolsSchen ley High SchoolTeacher CenterPittsburgh, PA 15213
Teacher Educators
Ms. Michael KendallGetty Center for Eu":ation in the Arts401 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 950Santa Monica, CA 90401-1455
Ms. Amy Brook SniderPratt Institute200 Willoughby AvenueBrooklyn, NY 11205
Ms. Kay WagnerVisual and Performing Arts UnitEducation CenterSan Diego City Schools4100 Normal StreetRoom 2007San Uic to, CA 92103
A5
30
![Page 31: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Dr. Enid ZimmermanSchool of EducationIndiana UniversityW.W. Wright Education Building, Room 0023rd & JordanBloomington, IN 47405
State Administrator
Ms. Patty TaylorVisual & Performing Artsand History-Social Sciences
California State Department of Education721 Capital MallSacremento, CA 95814
Barbara Albig157 Shadow lawn DrivePittsburgh, PA 15236
Dr. Martyna Bellessis3401 Tyler LaneBloomington, IN 47403
Dean Johns723 Neill Ridge RoadMatthews, NC 28105
Maureen Kennedy-Hood1700 U StreetRio Linda, CA 95673
Mark Moore800 S. Negley AvenuePittsburgh, PA 15232
Herb Perr1832 Charles Smith RoadSaugerties, NY 12477
Pilot Participants
A6
31
![Page 32: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Renee Sandell6012 Onondaga RoadBethesda, MD 20816
Dr. Susan M. Shoaff605 E. Patterson StreetKirksville, MO 63501
George Webb7154 Upland StreetPittsburgh, PA 15208
Emmy Whitehead1906 E. 5th StreetGreenville, NC 27834
A7
32
![Page 33: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Appendix B
Job Analysis Survey
BI
![Page 34: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
JOB ANALYSIS INVENTORY
FOR ART TEACHERS
By
Educational Testing ServicePrinceton, New Jersey
April, 1992
Copyright © 1992 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved.
B3
34
![Page 35: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
Educational Testing Service (ETS) is developing a new generation of assessments for thepurpose of licensing teachers. The inventory that follows is part of our development effort and isdesigned to gather information concerning the entry-level art teacher's job. It was developed byclassroom teachers, college faculty, and state department of education officials, along with ETS staff.
Those who constructed this inventory recognize that art teachers are required to teachstudents with varying backgrounds and levels of ability. For this reason, the collaborators believethat teachers should have a broad and deep understanding of art in order to teach it. The inventoryasks you to respond to areas of knowledge and to rate each area as to its importance for a newlylicensed (certified) art teacher. Please do not relate each statement to your own job but rather towhat you believe an entry-level art teacher should know and be able to do.
The information you provide will guide the development of the new NTE art educationexamination. It is expected that the new examination will differ from the current examination in
both content and design. In addition to the development of a new examination, this study will alsocontribute to our understanding of art education as a profession. The results of the study areexpected to be widely disseminated and should be very useful to the profession.
The inventory has been mailed to a group of 800 professionals. Its value is directly relatedto the number of individuals who return their completed inventories. Because you will berepresenting a large number of professionals, your responses are extremely important. Please takethe time to complete and return the inventory.
B4
35
![Page 36: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
PART I KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES FOR ART TEACHERS
The purpose of this inventory is to determine what you believe newly licensed (certified) art teachers shouldknow and be able to do in order to perform their job in a competent manner. On the following pages you willfind eight major content areas and, beneath each, a list of knowledge and ability statements that define theparticular content area. The order of presentation of the eight content areas is not meaningful.
The eight content areas are:
I. VOCABULARYOF ARTII. CONTENT OF ART
III. GLOBAL TRADITIONS IN ART, ARCHITECTUREAND DESIGNIV. NATURE OF ART/AESTHETICSV. THE CRITICISM OF ART
VI. THE MAKING OF ARTVII. DOCUMENTATION OF PERSONAL ART MAKING
VIII. PEDAGOGY SPECIFIC TO ART
For each statement within each of these content areas, you will be asked to make the following judgment:
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the 5-point scale adjacent to each statement.
Note that any individual art teacher may have extensive knowledge or skill in sonic areas, but not in others; andareas of expertise may vary from one art teacher to another. All art teachers, however, should have someknowledge and skills in a variety of areas, including those outside their own area of expertise. The purpose ofthis survey is to identify those areas in which all beginning art teachers, regardless of their individual areas ofexpertise, should have some knowledge or skill.
To familiarize yourself with the content areas and statements, you may wish to glance through Part I beforemaking your judgments.
135
3 6
![Page 37: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
I. VOCABULARYOF ART IMPORTANCE
1. Terminology needed to promote analytical and metaphoric thinking . 0 1 2 3 4
2. Terminology needed to identify and discuss relationships amongaesthetics, art making, art criticism, and art history 0 1 2 3 4
3. Terminology needed to identify and discuss relationships between thevisual arts including architecture, design, and other art forms (e.g.,poetry, dance, music) 0 1 2 3 4
4. Terminology needed to discuss art forms and techniques 0 1 2 3 4
5. Traditional art elements and principles 0 1 2 3 4
6. Contemporary principles of organization (e.g., juxtaposition,appropriation, transformation) 0 1 2 3 4
7. Overall evaluation of the importance of Vocabulary of Art 0 1 2 3 4
8. How well do the statements in section I cover the important aspects of Vocabulary of Art?
1 2 3 4 5
Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
B6
37
![Page 38: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
II. CONTENT OF ART IMPORTANCE
9. Analyze and discuss how the treatment of the content of the work isrelated to the content and the purpose of a work of art 0 1 2 3 4
10. Analyze and describe the purpose or intent of works of art (i.e.,personalexpression, perceptual studies, social or political commentary, religious,utilitarian, etc.) 0 1 2 3 4
11. Overall evaluation of Content of Art 0 1 2 3 4
12. How well do the statements in section II cover the important aspects of Content of Art?
. 1 2 3 4 5
Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
III. GLOBAL TRADITIONS IN ART, ARCHITECTURE,AND DESIGN
A. Historical Analysis
Recognize the historical context of works of art and be able to discuss them with reference to thefollowing:
IMPORTANCE
13. Role of the artist in society
14. Stylistic and thematic influences of artists, architects, and movements onone another
15. Stylistic and thematic relationship between art and culture within one ormore periods (i.e., colonialism and other forms of domination, genderdiscrimination, technology and ecology)
16. Use of primary and secondary sources (e.g., artists' autobiographies andbiographies, diaries, manifestos, historical monographs)
B7
38
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
![Page 39: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
III. GLOBAL TRADITIONS IN ART, ARCHITECTURE,AND DESIGN(cont.) IMPORTANCE
17. Transmission of cultural values through two and three-dimensionalimages and forms 0 1 2 3 4
Impact of external forces on art and culture:
18. Colonialism and other forms of domination 0 1 2 3 4
19. Gender discrimination 0 1 2 3 4
20. Technology 0 1 2 3 4
21. Ecology 0 1 2 3 4
B. Periods, Themes, Styles and Movements Within Global Traditions ofArt, Design, and Crafts
Africa
22. Ancient art of the sub-Sahara (e.g., rock art, early animist traditions,Nok culture) 0 1 2 3 4
23. Ancient Egyptian, Nubian, and Ethiopian art 0 1 2 3 4
24. 10 century A.D. to the present (e.g., the' Akan, Yoruba, Benin,continuation of animist traditions) 0 1 2 3 4
The Americas
25. Pre-Columbian, Mexico to Peru 0 1 2 3 4
26. Native American art of North America (e.g., the Pacific Northwest, theSouthwest, early mound-building culture, Plains culture) 0 1 2 3 4
27. European-influenced traditions in the United States and Canada 0 1 2 3 4
28. European-influenced traditions in Mexico, Central America, and SouthAmerica 0 1 2 3 4
29. Folk art (contrasting traditions of North and South America) 0 1 2 3 4
B8
3"
![Page 40: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
HI. GLOBAL TRADITIONS IN ART, ARCHITECTURE,AND DESIGNIMPORTANCE
Asia/Oceania
30. The Indian subcontinent (Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic traditions, e.g., insculpture, temple architecture, miniature painting) 0 1 2 3 4
31. China (indigenous traditions, Buddhist influence, e.g., in sculpture,ceramics, scroll painting) 0 1 2 3 4
32. Southeast Asia (adaptations of Buddhist traditions, e.g., in templearchitecture) 0 1 2 3 4
33. Korea and Japan (indigenous traditions and influence of China, e.g.,ceramics, bronzes, ink painting, woodblock prints) 0 1 2 3 4
34. Asian folk art 0 1 2 3 4
35. Pacific Island cultures and Australia 0 1 2 3 4
Europe and the Near East
36. Prehistoric (e.g., cave paintings, megaliths, Cycladic idols) 0 1 2 3 4
37. Ancient art of the Mediterranean (e.g., Mesopotamian, Persian, classicalGreek, Roman, Etruscan) 0 1 2 3 4
38. Early Christian/Byzantine 0 1 2 3 4
39. Islamic (e.g., rise of the non-figurative tradition, Moorish influences inSpain) 0 1 2 3 4
40. Medieval 0 1 2 3 4
41. Renaissance (both northern European and southern European) 0 1 2 3 4
42. 17th century (e.g., baroque) 0 1 2 3 4
43. 18th century (e.g., rococo, neoclassical, romantic) 0 1 2 3 4
44. 19th century (e.g., realist, impressionist, postimpressionist) 0 1 2 3 4
45. Folk traditions 0 1 2 3 4
B9
![Page 41: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
III. GLOBAL TRADITIONS IN ART, ARCHITECTURE,AND DESIGNIMPORTANCE(cont.)
20tli Century Movements
46. Cubism 0 1 2 3 4
47. Expressionism (e.g., German, abstract) 0 1 2 3 4
48. Constructivism 0 1 2 3 4
49. Dadaism 0 1 2 3 4
50. Futurism 0 1 2 3 4
51. Surrealism 0 1 2 3 4
52. Folk art 0 1 2 3 4
53. Social realism (e.g., Russia, China, the Americas) 0 1 2 3 4
54. Mid 20th century: 1945-1980 (e.g., pop art, hard edge, color field,conceptual art) 0 1 2 3 4
55. Late 20th century (e.g., photorealism, post-modern, performance art,popular culture, street art) 0 ! 2 3 4
56. Overall evaluation of the importance of Global Traditions in Art,Architecture, and Design 0 1 2 3 4
BIO
41
![Page 42: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
III. GLOBAL TRADITIONS IN ART. ARCHITECTURE,AND DESIGNicont.) IMPORTANCE
57. How well do the statements in section III cover the important aspects of Global Traditions inArt, Architecture, and Design?
1 2 3 4 5Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
IV. NATURE OF ART/AESTHETICS IMPORTANCE
Recognize, discuss, interpret, and analyze the art works of major styles andcultures with reference to the following topics:
58. Definitions of art (establish and apply criteria for identifying art) 0 1 2 3 4
59. Nature of aesthetic experience (identify aesthetic criteria and apply themto describe aesthetic experience with reference to nonart objects as wellas art objects) 0 1 2 3 4
60. Meaning in art (interpret narrative content, imagery, symbolism, and 0 1 2 3 4emotional affect of works of art)
61. Aesthetics (identify, interpret, and apply widely known theories ofaesthetics, e.g.,theories of Rudolph Anaheim, Suzanne Langer, Harry SBroudy, Karl Marx) 0 1 2 3 4
B11
2
![Page 43: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be. teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
IV. NATURE OF ART/AESTHETICS (cont.)
62. Overall evaluation of Nature of Art/Aesthetics
IMPORTANCE
0 1 2 3 4
63. How well do the statements in section IV cover the important aspects of Nature ofArt/Aesthetics?
1 2 3 4 5
Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
V. THE CRITICISM OF ART
Demonstrate knowledge of the basic principles of art criticism and applythat knowledge in order to:
IMPORTANCE
64. Describe, analyze, interpret, evaluate, judge, and critique works of art . . 0 1 2 3 4
65. Describe the role and function of the art critic 0 1 2 3 4
66. Read, interpret, and evaluate art criticism as part of the process ofapplying that criticism to works of art 0 1 2 3 4
B12
43
![Page 44: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
V. THE CRITICISM OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
67. Overall evaluation of the importance of The Criticism or Art 0 1 2 3 4
68. How well do the statements in section V cover the important aspects of The Criticism of Art?
1 2 3 4 5Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
VI. THE MAKING OF ART IMPORTANCE
A. The Creative Process 0 1 2 3 4
B. Art forms
DRAWING
Kinds of Drawings (e.g., figure, nature, person-made environment)
69. From observation 0 1 2 3 4
70. From imagination 0 1 2 3 4
Use of Tools, Media, and Materials
71. Graphite (pencil) 0 1 2 3 4
72. Colored pencil 0 1 2 3 4
B13
4 4
![Page 45: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will he teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
73. Crayon, 0 1 2 3 4
74. Charcoal 0 1 2 3 4
75. Conte 0 1 2 3 4
76. Chalk 0 1 2 3 4
77. Pastel 0 1 2 3 4
78. Oil pastel 0 1 2 3 4
79. Watercolor 0 1 2 3 4
80. Pen/brush and ink 0 1 2 3 4
81. Felt tip pen 0 1 2 3 4
82. Tools for computer drawing (e.g., mouse, light pen) 0 1 2 3 4
83. Surfaces (e.g., paper, fabric, human body) 0 1 2 3 4
84. Erasers 0 1 2 3 4
85. Fixatives/solvents 0 1 2 3 4
86. Brushes 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques or Methods
87. Scratchboard 0 1 2 3 4
88. Wash 0 1 2 3 4
89. Mixed media 0 1 2 3 4
90. Line (e.g., contour, hatching, gesture) 0 1 2 3 4
91. Value/shading 0 1 2 3 4
92. Cartooning 0 1 2 3 4
93. Computer drawing 0 1 2 3 4
B14
45
![Page 46: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
94. Perspective (e.g., linear, intuitive, atmospheric) 0 1 2 3 4
95. Mechanical drawing 0 1 2 3 4
96. Overall evaluation of the importance of Drawing 0 1 2 3 4
PAINTING
Use of Tools, Media, or Materials
97. Watercolor 0 1 2 3 4
98. Tempera 0 1 2 3 4
99. Acrylics 0 1 2 3 4
100. Oils 0 1 2 3 4
101. Adhesives 0 1 2 3 4
102. Surfaces (e.g., canvases, papers, walls) 0 1 2 3 4
103. Brushes/knives 0 1 2 3 4
104. Solvents 0 1 2 3 4
105. Air brush 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques or Methods
106. Fresco 0 1 2 3 4
107. Egg Tempera 0 1 2 3 4
108. Collage 0 1 2 3 4
109. Mixed media 0 1 2 3 4
110. Resists 0 1 2 3 4
111. Encaustic 0 1 2 3 4
112. Brush techniques (e.g, wash, dry brush, wet into wet) 0 1 2 3 4
B15
4C
![Page 47: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
113. Impasto 0 1 2 3 4
114. Overall evaluation of the importance of Painting 0 1 2 3 4
PRINTMAKING
Use of Tools, Media, Materials, and Equipment
115. Brayer 0 1 2 3 4
116. Press 0 1 2 3 4
117. Baren 0 1 2 3 4
118. Squeegee 0 1 2 3 4
119. Ink 0 1 2 3 4
120. Surfaces (e.g., paper, fabric) 0 1 2 3 4
121. Plates (e.g., linoleum, copper, plexiglass) 0 1 2 3 4
122. Screens 0 1 2 3 4
123. Cutting tools 0 1 2 3 4
124. Bench hooks 0 1 2 3 4
125. Computers 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques and Methods
126. Monoprint 0 1 2 3 4
127. Relief (e.g., lino, stamping, wood, cardboard, callograph) 0 1 2 3 4
128. Stencil / si 1 kscreen/serigraphy 0 1 2 3 4
129. Lithography 0 1 2 3 4
B16
47
![Page 48: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensee (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
130. Intaglio (e.g., etching, engraving, drypoint) 0 1 2 3 4
131. Overall evaluation of the importance of Printmaking 0 1 2 3 4
PHOTOGRAPHY
Use of Basic Materials and Equipment
132. Camera 0 1 2 3 4
133. Film 0 1 2 3 4
134. Paper 0 1 2 3 4
135. Chemicals (e.g., developer, stop bath, fixer) 0 1 2 3 4
136. Enlarger 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques and Methods
137. Printing (e.g., black and white, color, cameraless) 0 1 2 3 4
138. Manipulative (e.g., hand coloring, multiple negatives) 0 1 2 3 4
139. Overall evaluation of the importance of Photography 0 1 2 3 4
SCULPTURE
Types
140. Free standing 0 1 2 3 4
141. Kinetic 0 1 2 3 4
142. Relief 0 1 2 3 4
143. Environmental 0 1 2 3 4
144. Assemblages 0 1 2 3 4
145. Puppetry 0 1 2 3 4
146. Performance 0 1 2 3 4
817
48
![Page 49: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
147. Conceptual 0 1 2 3 4
148. Installation 0 1 2 3 4
Use of Media, Materials, and Equipment
149. Clay 0 1 2 3 4
150. Plaster 0 1 2 3 4
151. Papier mache 0 1 2 3 4
152. Wood 0 1 2 3 4
153. Stone 0 1 2 3 4
154. Metals 0 1 2 3 4
155. Plastics 0 1 2 3 4
156. Paper 0 1 2 3 4
157. Found objects 0 1 2 3 4
158. Fiber 0 1 2 3 4
159. Wire 0 1 2 3 4
160. Kiln 0 1 2 3 4
161. Tools (e.g., cutting tools, carving tools) 0 1 2 3 4
162. Armatures 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques or Methods
163. Additive 0 1 2 3 4
164. Subtractive 0 1 2 3 4
165. Modeling 0 1 2 3 4
166. Casting 0 1 2 3 4
B18
4!)
![Page 50: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderat3ly important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
167. Construction 0 1 2 3 4
168. Improvisation 0 1 2 3 4
169. Overall evaluation of the importance of Sculpture 0 1 2 3 4
COMMUNICATION ARTS (TECHNOLOGY /MEDIA)
Graphic Design
170. Posters 0 1 2 3 4
171. Calligraphy 0 1 2 3 4
172. Advertising 0 1 2 3 4
173. Illustration 0 1 2 3 4
174. Product design 0 1 2 3 4
175. Package design 0 1 2 3 4
176. Typography 0 1 2 3 4
Media Arts/Electronic Arts
177. Computer graphics 0 1 2 3 4
178. Video 0 1 2 3 4
179. Film 0 1 2 3 4
180. Electronic transmission (e.g., fax, laser disc, modems) 0 1 2 3 4
181. Photography 0 1 2 3 4
Use of Tools, Media/Materials, and Equipment
182. T-square 0 1 2 3 4
183. Triangle 0 1 2 3 4
184. Inks 0 1 2 3 4
B19
5
![Page 51: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
185. Compass 0 1 2 3 4
186. Brushes 0 1 2 3 4
187. Technical pens and pencils 0 1 2 3 4
188. Laser disc 0 1 2 3 4
189. Computer 0 1 2 3 4
190. Modem 0 1 2 3 4
191. VCR 0 1 2 3 4
192. Video camera 0 1 2 3 4
193. Camera 0 1 2 3 4
194. Projection equipment (e.g., slide, overhead) 0 1 2 3 4
195. Scanner 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques and Processes
196. Photostats 0 1 2 3 4
197. Layout & page design 0 1 2 3 4
198. Paste up/mechanicals 0 1 2 3 4
199. Editing 0 1 2 3 4
200. Overall evaluation of the importance of Communication Arts(Technology/Media) 0 1 2 3 4
CERAMICS
Types
201. Pottery 0 1 2 3 4
202. Tiles 0 1 2 3 4
B20
![Page 52: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
203. Sculpture 0 1 2 3 4
204. Containers 0 1 2 3 4
Use of Tools, Media, and Materials
205. Clay 0 1 2 3 4
206. Potter's wheel 0 1 2 3 4
207. Slip 0 1 2 3 4
208. Glaze 0 1 2 3 4
209. Mold 0 1 2 3 4
210. Kiln 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques and Processes
211. Stages (e.g., Leather hard, Greenware, Bisque) 0 1 2 3 4
212. Wedging 0 1 2 3 4
213. Firing 0 1 2 3 4
214. Decoration 0 1 2 3 4
215. Glazing 0 1 2 3 4
216. Hand built (e.g., pinch, slab, coil) 0 1 2 3 4
217. Casting 0 1 2 3 4
218. Wheel thrown 0 1 2 3 4
219. Overall evaluation of the importance of Ceramics 0 1 2 3 4
B21 52
![Page 53: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
CRAFTS/JEWELRY
Types
220. Stained glass 0 1 2 3 4
221. Mosaic 0 1 2 3 4
222. Papermaking 0 1 2 3 4
223. Metal jewelry 0 1 2 3 4
224. Ceramic jewelry 0 1 2 3 4
225. Plastic jewelry 0 1 2- 3 4
226. Paper jewelry 0 1 2 3 4
Use of Tools, Materials, and Equipment
227. Plastic 0 1 2 3 4
228. Natural materials 0 1 2 3 4
229. Metal (e.g.,copper, silver) 0 1 2 3 4
230. Clay 0 1 2 3 4
231. Fiber 0 1 2 3 4
232. Paper 0 1 2 3 4
233. Enamels 0 1 2 3 4
234. Kiln 0 1 2 3 4
235. Saw 0 1 2 3 4
236. Torches 0 1 2 3 4
237. Files 0 1 2 3 4
238. Casting machine 0 1 2 3 4
B22
53
![Page 54: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
239. Soldering iron 0 1 2 3 4
240. Solder 0 1 2 3 4
241. Glass cutter 0 1 2 3 4
242. Pug mill 0 1 2 3 4
243. Electric blender 0 1 2 3 4
244. Tile cutter 0 1 2 3 4
245. Deckle 0 1 2 3 4
246. Felts 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques and Processes
247. Fabrication 0 1 2 3 4
248. Scrimshaw 0 1 2 3 4
249. Enameling 0 1 2 3 4
250. Scraffito 0 1 2 3 4
251. Annealing 0 1 2 3 4
252. Sawing 0 I 2 3 4
253. Piercing 0 1 2 3 4
254. Soldering 0 1 2 3 4
255. Casting 0 1 2 3 4
256. Lamination 0 1 2 3 4
257. Overall evaluation of the importance of Crafts/Jewelry 0 1 2 3 4
B23 54
![Page 55: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
FIBER ARTS
Types
258. Constructed (e.g., weaving, basketry) 0 1 2 3 4
259. Surface decoration (e.g., Batik, stitchery, printed) 0 1 2 3 4
260. Cast (e.g., paper making) 0 1 2 3 4
Use of Tools, Materials, and Equinment
261. Loom 0 1 2 3 4
262. Yarns 0 1 2 3 4
263. Wax 0 1 2 3 4
264. Dyes 0 1 2 3 4
265. Fabric paint 0 1 2 3 4
266. Fabrics (e.g., silk, cotton) 0 1 2 3 4
267. Natural materials (e.g., reeds, sticks, shells) 0 1 2 3 4
268. Tjanting tools 0 1 2 3 4
269. Sewing machine 0 1 2 3 4
270. Mold and deckle 0 1 2 3 4
Techniques and Processes
271. Stitchery 0 1 2 3 4
272. Tie dye 0 1 2 3 4
273. Batik 0 1 2 3 4
274. Applique 0 1 2 3 4
275. Macrame 0 1 2 3 4
r.,24
55
![Page 56: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE276. Quilting 0 1 2 3 4
277. Basketry 0 1 2 3 4
278. Weaving 0 1 2 3 4
279. Paper making 0 1 2 3 4
280. Overall evaluation of the importance of Fiber Arts 0 1 2 3 4
NEWER ART FORMS
281. Performance 0 1 2 3 4
282. Installation 0 1 2 3 4
283. Environmental (earthworks, site works) 0 1 2 3 4
284. Overall evaluation of the importance of Newer Art Forms 0 1 2 3 4
C. Presentation/Display of Art Forms 0 1 2 3 4
D. Health and Safety Concerns
285. Dust (e.g.,charcoal, clay, pastels) 0 1 2 3 4
286. Fumes (e.g., sprays, markers, kiln, rubber cement) 0 1 2 3 4
287. Solvents (e.g., turpentine, lacquer) 0 1 2 3 4
288. Tools 0 1 2 3 4
289. Dyes 0 1 2 3 4
290. Glazes 0 1 2 3 4
291. Overall evaluation of the importance of The Making of Art 0 1 2 3 4
B25
![Page 57: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardless
of the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VI. THE MAKING OF ART (cont.)
. 292. How well do the statements in section VI cover the important aspects of The Making of Art?
1 2 3 4 5
Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
VII.
Demonstrate
DOCUMENTATION OF PERSONAL ART MAKING IMPORTANCE
the ability to create and discuss works of art in the following areas:
293. Drawing 0 1 2 3 4
294. Painting 0 1 2 3 4
295. Printmaking 0 1 2 3 4
296. Sculpture 0 1 2 3 4
297. Ceramics 0 1 2 3 4
298. Crafts/Jewelry 0 1 2 3 4
299. Communication Arts (Technology/Media) 0 1 2 3 4
300. Newer art forms (e.g., performance, installation) 0 1 2 3 4
301. Overall evaluation of the importance of Documentation of Personal Art
Making 0 1 2 3 4
1326
![Page 58: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
302. How well do the tasks in section VII cover the important aspects of Documentation of PersonalArt Making?
1 2 3 4 5Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
VIII. PEDAGOGY SPECIFIC TO ART IMPORTANCE
In addition to content, art teachers also need to know something about pedagogy specific to art. Thisincludes knowledge of students, curriculum, teaching strategies, and resources.
A. Underlying Factors that Influence Learning and Instruction
303. Complex factors that affect the teaching of art (e.g., societal, cultural,ethnic, gender, religious, socio-economic, linguistic) 0 1 2 3 4
304. Impact of context on understanding and making art 0 1 2 3 4
305. Complex factors that affect the student's learning of art (e.g., societal,cultural, ethnic, gender, religious, socio-economic, linguistic) 0 1 2 3 4
306. Disciplines that affect the teaching of art (e.g., anthropology, history,philosophy, psychology) 0 1 2 3 4
307. Disciplines (e.g., anthropology, history, philosophy, psychology) thataffect the student's learning of art 0 1 2 3 4
308. Impact of developmental and learning theories on teaching art 0 1 2 3 4
B. Curriculum: Organization and Materials
309. Purposes for teaching art 0 1 2 3 4310. Purposes for teaching particular concepts, issues, and/or forms in art 0 1 2 3 4
B27
58
![Page 59: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardless
of the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VIII. PEDAGOGY SPECIFIC TO ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
311. Relationships among concepts, issues, and/or forms in art 0 1 2 3 4
312. Relationships among the arts 0 1 2 3 4
313. Relationships between visual arts and other disciplines 0 1 2 3 4
314. Scope and sequence in art curricula for a particular group of students
and a rationale for them 0 1 2 3 4
315. Common misconceptions that students have about art and art making . . 0 1 2 3 4
316. Unit and lesson plans in art curricula for a particular group of students
and rationale for the plans 0 1 2 3 4
317. Curriculum materials and equipment for art appropriate for particular
groups of students and particular concepts, issues and/or forms 0 1 2 3 4
318. Popular culture appropriate for particular groups of students and
particular concepts, issues and/or forms in art (e.g.,comic books, film,
television, video)0 1 2 3 4
319. Instructional techniques appropriate for particular groups of students
and particular concepts, issues and/or forms in art (e.g.,computer,
videodisc, interactive television) 0 1 2 3 4
C. Resources
320. Cultural institutions (e.g., museums, galleries, community centers.
parks)0 1 2 3 4
321. The art world (e.g., art dealers, art critics, collectors) .0 1 2 3 4
322. Human resources (e.g., artistic, elders, gallery directors, community
agency personnel)0 1 2 3 4
323. Environment (e.g., classroom, school, community) 0 1 2 3 4
1328
51-1
![Page 60: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, if they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VIII. PEDAGOGYSPECIFIC TO ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
D. Instruction
324. Knowledge, experience, and skills that students bring to variousconcepts, issues and/or forms in art
325. Knowledge, experience, and skills that students need for variousconcepts, issues and/or forms in art
326. Diverse ways of explaining /.presenting art that make the subject matterunderstandable and interesting to particular groups of students (e.g.,modeling, metaphors, analogies, drawings, performance, presentation ofslides and prints)
327. Strategies and activities related to specific art objectives appropriate forparticular groups of students (e.g., research, brainstorming, questioning,supervised practice, group work, lecture)
E. Assessment
328. Evaluation strategies to assess student performance in art (e.g.,portfolios, observations, interviews, discussions, essays, tests, journals,sketch books, performances)
F. Professional Concerns Related to Teaching a Particular Content Area
329. Professional and scholarly literature appropriate for art teachers andstudents
330. Professional and scholarly organizations for art teachers and students
B29
60
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
![Page 61: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
How important is this knowledge or skill for all newly licensed (certified) art teachers, regardlessof the grade level they will be teaching, they are to perform their jobs in a competent manner?
(0) Of no importance(1) Of little importance(2) Moderately important(3) Important(4) Very important
Circle your response using the scale adjacent to each statement.
VIII. PEDAGOGY SPECIFIC TO ART (cont.) IMPORTANCE
331. Overall evaluation of the importance of Pedagogy Specific to Art 0 1 2 3 4
332. How well do the statements in section VIII cover the important aspects of Pedagogy Specific toArt?
1 2 3 4 5Very Poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very Well
What important aspects, if any, are not covered?
B30
61
![Page 62: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
PART II - BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS
The information which you provide in answering the questions in this section is completely confidential and willbe used for research purposes only. Your responses will be grouped statistically with those of other individualswho are participating in this survey. A vital part of the statistical analysis involves grouping respondents withsimilar experience and backgrounds. To do this, we need your answers to the following questions:
(Circle your response).
333. Where do you work?
1. Alabama 18. Kentucky 36. Ohio2. Alaska 19. Louisiana 37. Oklahoma3. Arizona 20. Maine 38. Oregon4. Arkansas 21. Maryland 39. Pennsylvania5. California 22. Massachusetts 40. Puerto Rico6. Colorado 23. Michigan 41. Rhode Island7. Connecticut 24. Minnesota 42. South Carolina8. Delaware 25. Mississippi 43. South Dakota9. District of 26. Missouri 44. Tennessee
Columbia 27. Montana 45. Texas10. Florida 28. Nebraska 46. Utah11. Georgia 29. Nevada 47. Vermont12. Hawaii 30. New Hampshire 48. Virginia13. Idaho 31. New Jersey 49. Washington14. Illinois 32. New Mexico 50. West Virginia15. Indiana 33. New York 51. Wisconsin16. Iowa 34. North Carolina 52. Wyoming17. Kansas 35. North Dakota
334. What is your age?
1. Under 252. 25-343. 35-444. 45-545. 55-646. 65 and over
335. What is your sex?
1. Female2. Male
336. Which of the following best describes the area in which you work?
1. Urban2. Suburban3. Rural
B31
62
![Page 63: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION (continued)
337. How do you describe yourself?
1. Native American, American Indian or Alaskan native2. Asian American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander3. African American or Black4. Mexican American or Chicano5. Puerto Rican6. Latin American, South American, Central American, or other Hispanic7. White8. Other
338. Which of the following best describes your highest educational attainment?
1. Less than a Bachelors2. Bachelors3. Bachelors + additional credits4. Masters5. Masters + additional credits6. Doctorate
339. Which of the following best describes your current employment status?
1. Temporary substitute (assigned on a daily basis)2. Permanent substitute (assigned on a longer term basis)3. Regular teacher (not a substitute)4. Principal or assistant principal5. School administrator6. Curricular supervisor7. State administrator8. College faculty9. Other (please specify)
340. If you are presently teaching, do you teach in more than one school?
1. Yes2. No3. Do not presently teach
B32
63
![Page 64: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION (continued)
341. How many years have you taught art?
1. Never taught art2. Less than a year3. 1 2 years4. 3 - 5 years5. 6 - 10 years6. 11 - 15 years7. 16 20 years8. 21 or more years
342. Which of the following best describes the grade level(s) you are currently teaching? (Circle only onecategory)
1. Preschool/kindergarten2. Elementary only3. Middle only4. Secondary only5. Elementary and middle6. Middle and secondary7. K-128. College or university9. Do not currently teach10. Other (please specify)
343. Circle the organizations to which you currently belong.
1. National Art Education Association2. The art education association of your state3. International Society for Education Through Art4. College Art Association5. Alliance for Arts Education6. National Council of Artists7. Other (please specify)
1333
64
![Page 65: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
. BACKGROUND INFORMATION (continued)
344. Circle the primary area in which you teach. (Circle only one category)
1. Art history2. Criticism3. Aesthetics4. Drawing5. Painting6. Printmaking7. Photography8. Sculpture9. Communication arts (e.g., film, TV)10. Computer art/animation11. Ceramics12. Jewelry13. Fiber arts14. General crafts15. General art16. Other (Please specify)
345. Circle the primary area in which you practice. (Circle only one category)
1. Art history2. Criticism3. Aesthetics4. Drawing5. Painting6. Printmaking7. Photography8. Sculpture9. Communication arts (e.g., film, TV)10. Computer art/animation11. Ceramics12. Jewelry13. Fiber arts14. General crafts15. General art16. Other (Please specify)
THANK YOU FOR COMPLETING THIS INVENTORY.PLEASE RETURN IT WITHIN 10 DAYS USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
834
65
![Page 66: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Appendix C
Survey Cover Letter
CI
6 6
![Page 67: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE
00(1.:,
ck, :4 .
LABLI
riViCION OF API'l IED
'.fE..S'RF.MENF RESFAI,Cti
May 1992
Dear Colleague:
PRINCETON. N.J. 08541
1 am writing to ask your cooperation in a project that should be of importance to teachers, collegefaculty, administrators, and other professionals in the field. Educational Testing Service (ETS) is inthe process of developing a new generation of assessments for the purpose of licensing teachers. Onetype of assessment will be created to measure the prospective teacher's subject-matter or specialty-areaknowledge and will likely be administered upon completion of the undergraduate teacher educationprogram. One such assessment is a new version of the NTE Art Education examination. I am askingfor your help as we develop this examination.
As part of the developmental process, ETS has worked closely with an advisory committee ofclassroom teachers, college faculty, and school administrators to identify potentially importantknowledge and skill areas in art education instruction. The enclosed inventory has been constructed as
a way to obtain your judgments of the importance of these areas for newly licensed (certified) arteducation teachers. Your responses and those of other professionals to this inventory will guide thedevelopment of the new examination.
You will notice that the inventory asks for some background information about you this is solely forpurposes of describing respondents. Your answers will be treated in strict confidence.
A postage-paid envelope is enclosed for the return of your completed inventory. Thank you for yourparticipation in this important project.
Sincerely,
-7(
udith Norback, Ph.D.Research Scientist
Enclosures (2)
C3
67
![Page 68: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Appendix D
Demographic Distributions
DI
68
![Page 69: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Demographic Distributions
Number Percent
AGE (years)
Under 25 3 1.1
25-34 23 8.8
35-44 71 27.1
45-54 91 34.7
55-64 48 18.3
65 and over 9 3.4
No response 17 6.5
SEX
Female 149 56.9
Male 96 36.6
No response 17 6.5
RACE/ETHNICITY
American Indian or Alaskan Native 0.4
Asian, Asian American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 4 1.5
African American or Black 8 3.1
Hispanic 2 0.8
White 219 83.6
Other 5 1.9
No response 23 8.8
HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENTLess than Bachelor's 1 0.4
Bachelor's 10 3.8
Bachelor's + Credits 70 26.7
Master's 30 11.5
Master's + Credits 80 30.5
Doctorate 51 19.5
No response 20 7.6
D3
69
![Page 70: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Number Percent
TEACHING AREAUrban 75 28.6
Suburban 83 31.7
Rural 79 30.2
No response 25 9.5
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUSTemporary Substitute 0 0.0
Permanent Substitute 2 0.8
Regular Teacher (not a substitute) 141 53.8
Principal or Assistant Principal 0 0.0
School Administrator 0 0.0
Curricular Supervisor 1 0.4
State Administrator 10 3.8
College or University Faculty 71 27.1
Other 7 2.7
No response 30 11.5
TEACH IN MORE THAN ONE SCHOOLYes 58 22.1
No 175 66.8
Do not presently teach 10 3.8
No response 19 7.3
TEACHING EXPERIENCENever taught Art 8 3.1
Less than 1 year 3 1.1
1-2 years 7 2.7
3-5 years 18 6.9
6-10 years 32 11.1
11-15 years 29 11.1
16-20 years 36 13.7
21 or more years 114 43.5
No response 15 5.7
D4
41.0
![Page 71: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Number Percent
PRIMARY AREA OF TEACHING
Art history 6 2.3
Criticism 2 0.8
Aesthetics 1 0.4
Drawing 12 4.6
Painting 6 2.3
Printmaking 1 0.4
Photography 1 0.4
Sculpture 1 0.4
Communication arts (e.g., film, TV) 0 0.0
Computer art/animation 1 0.4
Ceramics 4 1.5
Jewelry 2 0.8
Fiber arts 2 0.8
General crafts 0 0.0
General art 123 46.9
Other 62 23.7
No response 38 14.5
PRIMARY AREA OF PRACTICE
Art history 3 1.1
Criticism 1 0.4
Aesthetics 2 0.8
Drawing 30 11.5
Painting 61 23.3
, Printmaking 3 1.1
Photography 5 1.9
Sculpture 10 3.8
Communication arts (e.g., film, TV) 1 0.4
Computer art/animation 4 1.5
Ceramics 12 4.6
Jewelry 6 2.3
Fiber arts 10 3.8
General crafts 5 1.9
General art 52 19.8
Other 31 11.8
No response 26 9.9
D5
![Page 72: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Number Percent
GRADES CURRENTLY TEACHINGPreschool/Kindergarten 0 0.0
Elementary only 40 15.3
Middle only 21 8.0
Secondary only 35 13.4
Elementary and middle 12 4.6
Middle and secondary 23 8.8
K - 12 10 3.8
College or university 82 31.3
Do not currently teach 9 3.4
Other 9 3.4
No response 21 8.0
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP
National Art Education Association 13 5.0
State Art Education Association 27 10.3
International Society for Education through Art 1 0.4
College Art Association 2 0.8
Alliance for Arts Education 3 1.1
National Council of Artists 0 0.0
Other 29 11.1
Multiple membership 109 41.6
No response 78 29.8
GEOGRAPHIC REGIONNortheast 52 19.8
Central 70 26.7
South 63 24.0
Far West 52 19.8
No response 25 9.5
D6
0-1, 2
![Page 73: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Appendix E
ortance Ratings for Teachers and College Faculty
El
73
![Page 74: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
hers
43
SD
Col
lege N
Mea
n
Tea
cN
=1
Mea
n
Fac
ulty
71
SD
I. V
OC
AB
ULA
RY
OF
AR
T
1.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
pro
mot
e an
alyt
ical
and
met
apho
ric th
inki
ng2.
920.
823.
130.
86
2.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
iden
tify
and
disc
uss
rela
tions
hips
am
ong
aest
hetic
s, a
rt m
akin
g, a
rt c
ritic
ism
, and
art
his
tory
3.18
0.77
3.45
0.70
3.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
iden
tify
and
disc
uss
rela
tions
hips
bet
wee
n th
e vi
sual
art
s in
clud
ing
arch
itect
ure,
des
ign,
and
oth
er a
rt2.
720.
912.
940.
80fo
rms
(e.g
., po
etry
, dan
ce, m
usic
)
4.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
dis
cuss
art
form
s an
d te
chni
ques
5.T
radi
tiona
l art
ele
men
ts a
nd p
rinci
ples
6.C
onte
mpo
rary
prin
cipl
es o
f org
aniz
atio
n (e
.g.,
juxt
apos
ition
)
7.O
vera
ll ev
alua
tion
of th
e im
port
ance
of V
ocab
ular
y of
Art
II. C
ON
TE
NT
OF
AR
T
9.A
naly
ze a
nd d
iscu
ss h
ow th
e tr
eatm
ent o
f the
con
tent
of t
he w
ork
is r
elat
ed to
the
cont
ent a
nd th
e pu
rpos
e of
a w
ork
of a
rt2.
710.
883.
090.
7410
.A
naly
ze a
nd d
escr
ibe
the
purp
ose
or in
tent
of w
orks
of a
rt2.
930.
873.
410.
6311
.O
vera
ll ev
alua
tion
of C
onte
nt o
f Art
2.92
0.80
3.28
0.72
III. G
LOB
AL
TR
AD
ITIO
NS
IN A
RT
, AR
CH
ITE
CT
UR
E, A
ND
DE
SIG
N
A.
His
toric
al A
naly
sis
13.
Rol
e of
the
artis
t in
soci
ety
3.26
0.78
3.19
0.70
14.
Sty
listic
and
them
atic
influ
ence
s of
art
ists
, arc
hite
cts,
and
mov
emen
ts o
n on
e an
othe
r2.
920.
842.
980.
8715
.S
tylis
tic a
nd th
emat
ic r
elat
ions
hip
betw
een
art a
nd c
ultu
re w
ithin
one
or
mor
e pe
riods
(i.e
., co
loni
alis
m)
2.72
0.92
3.00
0.85
16.
Use
of p
rimar
y an
d se
cond
ary
sour
ces
(e.g
., ar
tists
' aut
obio
grap
hies
and
bio
grap
hies
, dia
ries)
2;40
.0.
950.
8017
.T
rans
mis
sion
of c
ultu
ral v
alue
s th
roug
h tw
o- a
nd th
ree-
dim
ensi
onal
imag
es a
nd fo
rms
2.90
0.87
3.21
0.69
Impa
ct o
f ext
erna
l for
ces
on a
rt a
nd c
ultu
re:
18.
Col
onia
lism
and
oth
er fo
rms
of d
omin
atio
n2.
100.
850.
80.
19.
Gen
der
disc
rimin
atio
n2.
391.
012.
630.
81
3.60
0.57
3.51
0.81
3.71
0.54
3.47
0.86
2.77
0.98
2.94
0.82
3.34
0.70
3.46
0.56
Not
e: M
eans
bel
ow 2
.50
are
shad
ed.
E3
7 4
![Page 75: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
20. T
echn
olog
y
21.
Eco
logy
B.
Per
iods
, The
mes
, Sty
les
and
Mov
emen
ts w
ithin
Glo
bal T
radi
tions
of A
rt, D
esig
n, a
nd C
rafts
Afr
ica
22.
Anc
ient
art
of t
he s
ub-S
ahar
a (e
.g.,
rock
art
, ear
ly a
nim
ist t
radi
tions
)
23.
Anc
ient
Egy
ptia
n, N
ubia
n, a
nd E
thio
pian
art
24.
10 c
entu
ry A
.D. t
o th
e pr
esen
t (e.
g., t
he A
kan,
Yor
uba,
Ben
in, c
ontin
uatio
n of
ani
mis
ttra
ditio
ns)
The
Am
eric
as
25.
Pre
-Col
umbi
an, M
exic
o to
Per
u
26.
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an a
rt o
f Nor
th A
mer
ica
(e.g
., th
e P
acifi
c N
orth
wes
t, ea
rly m
ound
-bui
ldin
g cu
lture
)
27.
Eur
opea
n-in
fluen
ced
trad
ition
s in
the
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
and
Can
ada
28.
Eur
opea
n-in
fluen
ced
trad
ition
s in
Mex
ico,
Cen
tral
Am
eric
a, a
nd S
outh
Am
eric
a
29.
Fol
k ar
t (co
ntra
stin
g tr
aditi
ons
of N
orth
and
Sou
th A
mer
ica)
Asi
a/O
cean
ia
30. T
he In
dian
sub
cont
inen
t (H
indu
, Bud
dhis
t, Is
lam
ic tr
aditi
ons,
e.g
., in
scu
lptu
re, t
empl
e ar
chite
ctur
e,m
inia
ture
pai
ntin
g)
31.
Chi
na (
indi
geno
us tr
aditi
ons,
Bud
dhis
t inf
luen
ce, e
.g.,
in s
culp
ture
, cer
amic
s, s
crol
l pai
ntin
g)
32.
Sou
thea
st A
sia
(ada
ptat
ions
of B
uddh
ist t
radi
tions
, e.g
., in
tem
ple
arch
itect
ure)
33.
Kor
ea a
nd J
apan
(in
dige
nous
trad
ition
s an
d in
fluen
ce o
f Chi
na, e
.g.,
cera
mic
s, b
ronz
es, i
nk p
aint
ing,
woo
dblo
ck p
rints
)
34.
Asi
an fo
lk a
rt
35.
Pac
ific
Isla
nd c
ultu
res
and
Aus
tral
ia
Eur
ope
and
the
Nea
r E
ast
36.
Pre
hist
oric
(e.
g., c
ave
pain
tings
, meg
alith
s, C
ycla
dic
idol
s)
37.
Anc
ient
art
of t
he M
edite
rran
ean
(e.g
., M
esop
otam
ian,
Per
sian
, cla
ssic
al G
reek
, Rom
an, E
trus
can)
38.
Ear
ly C
hris
tian/
Byz
antin
e
39.
Isla
mic
(e.
g., r
ise
of th
e no
nfig
urat
ive
trad
ition
, Moo
rish
influ
ence
s in
Spa
in)
40.
Med
ieva
l
41.
Ren
aiss
ance
(bo
th n
orth
ern
Eur
opea
n an
d so
uthe
rn E
urop
ean)
E4
Tea
cN
=he
rsC
olle
ge43
N =
Fac
ulty
71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
2.76
0.89
2.64
0.97
2.66
2.78
2.85
2.54
2.65
2.77
2.74
2.63
2.61
3.07
0.81
0.89
0.86
0.85
0.86
0.76
0.77
0.84
0.85
0.86
0.88
0.85
0.87
0.85
0.85
0.87
0.87
0.86
0.82
0.86
2.72
2.60
2.33
2.60
2.58
2.87
2.94
2.59
2.58
2.54
2.60
2.69
2.75
2.76
2.51
2.78
3.12
0.87
0.82
0.77
0.76
0.77
0.70
0.72
0.69
0.78
0.84
0.80
0.78
0.78
0.78
0.84
0.82
0.74
0.84
0.'8
8
0.76
0.73
0.74
![Page 76: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
42.
17th
cen
tury
(e.
g., b
aroq
ue)
43.'
18th
cen
tury
(e.
g., r
ococ
o, n
eocl
assi
cal,
rom
antic
)
44.
19th
cen
tury
(e.
g., r
ealis
t, im
pres
sion
ist,
post
impr
essi
onis
t)
45.
Fol
k tr
aditi
ons
20th
Cen
tury
Mov
emen
ts
46.
Cub
ism
47.
Exp
ress
ioni
sm (
e.g.
, Ger
man
, abs
trac
t)
48.
Con
stru
ctiv
ism
49.
Dad
aism
50.
Fut
uris
m
51.
Sur
real
ism
52.
Fol
k ar
t
53.
Soc
ial r
ealis
m (
e.g.
, Rus
sia,
Chi
na, t
he A
mer
icas
)
54.
Mid
20t
h ce
ntur
y: 1
945-
1980
(e.
g., p
op a
rt, h
ard
edge
, col
or fi
eld,
con
cept
ual a
rt)
55.
Late
20t
h ce
ntur
y (e
.g.,
phot
orea
lism
, pos
t-m
oder
n, p
erfo
rman
ce a
rt, p
opul
ar c
ultu
re, s
tree
t art
)
56.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f Glo
bal T
radi
tions
in A
rt, A
rchi
tect
ure,
and
Des
ign
IV. N
AT
UR
E O
F A
RT
/AE
ST
HE
TIC
S
58.
Def
initi
ons
of a
rt (
esta
blis
h an
d ap
ply
crite
ria fo
r id
entif
ying
art
)
59.
Nat
ure
of a
esth
etic
exp
erie
nce
(iden
tify
aest
hetic
crit
eria
and
app
ly th
em to
des
crib
e ae
sthe
tic e
xper
ienc
e)
60.
Mea
ning
in a
rt (
inte
rpre
t nar
rativ
e co
nten
t, im
ager
y, s
ymbo
lism
, and
em
otio
nal a
ffect
of w
orks
of a
rt)
61.
Aes
thet
ics
(iden
tify,
inte
rpre
t, an
d ap
ply
theo
ries
of a
esth
etic
s, e
.g.,
theo
ries
of R
udol
ph A
rnhe
im, S
uzan
ne L
ange
r, H
arry
S.
Bro
udy,
Kar
l Mar
x)
62.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
Nat
ure
of A
rt/A
esth
etic
s
V. T
HE
CR
ITIC
ISM
OF
AR
T
64.
Des
crib
e, a
naly
ze, i
nter
pret
, eva
luat
e, ju
dge,
and
crit
ique
wor
ks o
f art
65.
Des
crib
e th
e ro
le a
nd fu
nctio
n of
the
art c
ritic
66.
Rea
d, in
terp
ret,
and
eval
uate
art
crit
icis
m a
s pa
rt o
f the
pro
cess
of a
pply
ing
that
crit
icis
m to
wor
ks o
f art
67.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f The
Crit
icis
m o
r A
rt
10E
5
Tea
cher
sN
=14
3C
olle
ge F
acul
tyN
=71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
2.84
0.81
2.85
0.82
2.85
0.83
2.82
0.83
3.18
0.82
3.10
0.79
2.73
0.89
2.54
0.85
3.11
0.81
3.16
0.73
3.13
0.77
3.09
0.73
2.82
0.86
2.78
0.81
2.73
0.89
2.84
0.85
2.76
0.87
2.79
0.84
3.06
0.84
2.91
0.77
2.85
0.91
2.65
0.88
2.73
0.85
2.75
0.79
3.12
0.83
3.24
0.79
3.12
0.83
3.21
0.84
3.21
0.77
3.24
0.66
3.24
0.78
3.24
0.68
2.95
0.84
3.10
0.68
3.24
0.75
3.44
0.59
0.91
2.54
0.82
2.90
0.82
2.98
0.73
3.32
0.79
3.51
0.66
2.65
0.91
2.58
0.96
2.72
0.95
2.71
0.90
2.99
0.80
2.98
0.81
79
![Page 77: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
r`
Tea
c he
rsN
= 1
43
Col
lege
Fac
ulty
N71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
VI.
TH
E M
AK
ING
OF
AR
T
A.
The
Cre
ativ
e P
roce
ss3.
800.
473.
730.
56
B.
Art
For
ms
DR
AW
ING Kin
ds o
f Dra
win
gs (
e.q.
, fig
ure,
nat
ure,
per
son-
mad
een
viro
nmen
t)
69.
Fro
m o
bser
vatio
n3.
760.
483.
570.
71
70. F
rom
imag
inat
ion
3.64
0.62
3.40
0.73
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia, a
nd M
ater
ials
71.
Gra
phite
(pe
ncil)
3.67
0.56
3.52
0.63
72.
Col
ored
pen
cil
3.31
0.78
2.82
0.83
73.
Cra
yon
3.04
0.92
2.80
1.01
74.
Cha
rcoa
l3.
210.
752.
960.
79
75.
Con
te2.
910.
862.
720.
77
76.
Cha
lk2.
940.
892.
590.
87
77.
Pas
tel
3.17
0.79
2.84
0.80
78.
Oil
past
el2.
990.
922.
740.
87
79. W
ater
colo
r3.
420.
733.
250.
76
80.
Pen
/bru
sh a
nd in
k3.
280.
713.
210.
68
81.
Fel
t tip
pen
3.09
0.82
2.83
0.82
82.
Too
ls fo
r co
mpu
ter
draw
ing
(e.g
., m
ose,
ligh
t pen
)2.
931.
002.
970.
94
83.
Sur
face
s (e
.g.,
pape
r, fa
bric
, hum
an b
ody)
3.23
0.82
3.13
0.75
84.
Era
sers
2.91
0.90
0.94
85.
Fix
ativ
es/s
olve
nts
2.75
0.98
2.52
0.93
86.
Bru
shes
3.44
0.66
3.21
0.80
Tec
hniq
ues
or M
etho
ds
87.
Scr
atch
boar
d2.
830.
8814
41it
0.90
88. W
ash
3.31
0.73
3.09
0.80
E6
8 1
![Page 78: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
89.
Mix
ed m
edia
90.
Line
(e.
g., c
onto
ur, h
atch
ing,
ges
ture
)
91.
Val
ue/s
hadi
ng
92.
Car
toon
ing
93. C
ompu
ter
draw
ing
94.
Per
spec
tive
(e.g
., lin
ear,
intu
itive
, atm
osph
eric
)
95.
Mec
hani
cal d
raw
ing
96.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f dra
win
g
PA
INT
ING
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia, o
r M
ater
ials
97.
Wat
erco
lor
98. T
empe
ra
99.
Acr
ylic
s
100.
Oils
101.
Adh
esiv
es
102.
Sur
face
s (e
.g.,
canv
ases
, pap
ers,
wal
ls)
103.
Bru
shes
/kni
ves
104.
Sol
vent
s
105.
Air
brus
h
Tec
hniq
ues
or M
etho
ds
106.
Fre
sco
107.
Egg
Tem
pera
108.
Col
lage
109.
Mix
ed m
edia
110.
Res
ists
111.
Enc
aust
ic
112.
Bru
sh te
chni
ques
(e.
g, w
ash,
dry
bru
sh, w
et in
to w
et)
Tea
cher
sN
=14
3C
olle
ge F
acul
tyN
=71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
3.46
0.66
3.39
0.67
3.71
0.54
3.49
0.68
3.76
0.52
3.52
0.70
2.71
0.89
0.94
.. ..
2.85
0.95
2.67
1.04
3.57
0.65
3.42
0.75
0.98
0.79
3.76
0.48
3.67
0.54
3.53
0.63
3.32
0.73
3.36
0.73
3.20
0.79
3.35
0.72
3.23
0.70
7.78
0.99
2.74
0.93
2.88
0.84
2.78
0.86
3.25
0.76
3.14
0.76
3.28
0.75
3.18
0.72
2.80
1.01
2.91
0.93
1.03
0.89
1.03
0.93
1.03
0.98
3.27
0.86
3.29
0.72
3.42
0.71
3.44
0.66
3.07
0.84
2.82
0.76
0.98
01:
0.93
3.54
0.66
3.48
0.68
E7
8283
![Page 79: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
113.
Impa
sto
114.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f pai
ntin
g
PR
INT
MA
KIN
G
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia, M
ater
ials
, and
Equ
ipm
ent
115.
Bra
yer
116.
Pre
ss
117.
Bar
en
118.
Squ
eege
e
119.
Ink
120.
Sur
face
s (e
.g.,
pape
r; fa
bric
)
121.
Pla
tes
(e.g
., lin
oleu
m, c
oppe
r, p
lexi
glas
sl
122.
Scr
eens
123.
Cut
ting
tool
s
124.
Ben
ch h
ooks
4 25
.C
ompu
ters
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Met
hods
126.
Mon
oprin
t
127.
Rel
ief (
e.g.
, lin
o, s
tam
ping
, woo
d, c
ardb
oard
, cal
logr
aph)
128.
Ste
ncil/
silk
scre
en/s
erig
raph
y
129.
Lith
ogra
phy
130.
Inta
glio
(e.
g., e
tchi
ng, e
ngra
ving
, dry
poin
t)
131.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f prin
tmak
ing
PH
OT
OG
RA
PH
Y
Use
of B
asic
Mat
eria
ls a
nd E
quip
men
t
132.
Cam
era
133.
Film
134.
Pap
er
84.
E8
Tea
c ie
rsN
43C
olle
ge F
acul
ty71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
0.98
2.65
0.94
3.51
0.62
3.55
0.62
3.20
0.81
3.25
0.73
3.02
0.90
2.97
0.79
2.81
0.98
2.71
0.89
2.96
0.89
2.92
0.83
3.25
0.78
3.20
0.77
3.28
0.75
3.12
0.76
3.07
0.86
3.09
0.63
2.99
0.88
2.92
0.69
3.09
0.85
3.11
0.73
2.66
0.99
2.66
0.86
2.76
0.95
2.69
0.85
3.18
0.83
3.14
0.88
3.29
0.80
3.39
0.74
3.09
0.82
3.11
0.81
2.52
0.97
2.51
0.85
2.58
0.95
2.80
0.93
3.24
0.74
3.27
0.70
2.83
0.93
3.09
0.82
2.75
0.91
2.98
0.80
2.64
0.94
2.74
0.83
S5
![Page 80: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
135.
Che
mic
als
(e.g
., de
velo
per,
sto
p ba
th, f
ixer
)
136.
Enl
arge
r
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Met
hods
137.
Prin
ting
(e.g
., bl
ack
and
whi
te, c
olor
, cam
eral
ess)
138.
Man
ipul
ativ
e (e
.g.,
hand
col
orin
g, m
ultip
le n
egat
ives
)
139.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f pho
togr
aphy
SC
ULP
TU
RE
Typ
es
140.
Fre
e st
andi
ng
141.
Kin
etic
142.
Rel
ief
143.
Env
ironm
enta
l
144.
Ass
embl
ages
145.
Pup
petr
y
146.
Per
form
ance
147.
Con
cept
ual.
148.
Inst
alla
tion
Use
of M
edia
, Mat
eria
ls, a
nd E
quip
men
t
149.
Cla
y
150.
Pla
ster
151.
Pap
ier
mac
ho
152.
Woo
d
153.
Sto
ne
154.
Met
als
155.
Pla
stic
s
156.
Pap
er
157.
Fou
nd o
bjec
ts
86E
9
Tea
cN
=1he
rsC
olle
ge43
N=
Fac
ulty
71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
2.58
2.56
1.00
1.00
2.62
0.97
0.94
2.65
0.94
3.29
2.95
3.21
2.93
3.07
2.68
2.80
2.68
3.45
3.04
3.19
2.84
3.36
3.21
0.73
0.87
0.74
0.89
0.80
0.98
1.07
0.99
0.97
0.70
0.85
0.89
0.88
1.00
0.99
0.97
0.74
0.78
2.72
2.74
2.82
2.55
2.91
3.32
2.76
3.12
2.75
3.05
2.66
2.66
2.53
3.54
3.05
3.22
3.05
2.68
2.65
3.38
3.17
87
0.82
0.85
0.83
0.85
0.88
0.73
0.73
0.80
0.81
0.84
1.00
0.83
0.78
0.82
0.56
0.80
0.76
0.76
0.95
0.85
0.78
0.68
0.89
![Page 81: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
88
Tea
c he
rsN
= 4
3C
olle
ge F
acul
tyN
71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
158.
Fib
er3.
050.
842.
820.
95
159.
Wire
2:99
0.86
2.86
0.95
160.
Kiln
3.35
0.80
3.28
0.76
161.
Too
ls (
e.g.
, cut
ting
tool
s, c
arvi
ng to
ols)
3.32
0.73
3.18
0.75
162.
Arm
atur
es2.
910.
882.
940.
90
Tec
hniq
ues
or M
etho
ds
163.
Add
itive
3.40
0.73
3.42
0.70
164.
Sub
trac
tive
3.36
0.76
3.34
0.76
165.
Mod
elin
g3.
370.
753.
370.
74
166.
Cas
ting
2.84
1.04
2.97
0.87
167.
Con
stru
ctio
n3.
320.
723.
250.
72
168.
Impr
ovis
atio
n3.
060.
862.
930.
85
169.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f scu
lptu
re3.
370.
653.
430.
68
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
N A
RT
S (
TE
CH
NO
LOG
Y/M
ED
IA)
Gra
phic
Des
iqn
170.
Pos
ters
3.28
0.71
3.04
0.86
171.
Cal
ligra
phy
2.93
0.84
2.68
1.08
172.
Adv
ertis
ing
3.09
0.80
2.75
0.92
173.
Illus
trat
ion
3.16
0.76
2.87
0.86
174.
Pro
duct
des
ign
2.86
0.84
2.54
0.92
175.
Pac
kage
des
ign
2.85
0.85
:;4
40.
87
176.
Typ
ogra
phy
2.66
0.94
2.61
0.96
Med
ia A
rts/
Ele
ctro
nic
Art
s
177.
Com
pute
r gr
aphi
cs3.
000.
963.
000.
99
178.
Vid
eo2.
720.
902.
680.
85
179.
Film
2.50
0.89
:2A
80.
80
180.
Ele
ctro
nic
tran
smis
sion
(e.
g., f
ax, l
aser
dis
c, m
odem
s)2.
941.
002.
420.
96
Ell)
![Page 82: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Tea
cher
sN
=14
3C
olle
ge F
acul
tyN
=71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
181.
Pho
togr
aphy
2.76
0.80
3.04
0.84
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia/M
ater
ials
, and
Equ
ipm
ent
182.
T-s
quar
e2.
930.
932.
681.
04
183.
Tria
ngle
2.81
0.96
2.65
1.03
184.
Inks
3.13
0.79
2.87
0.96
185.
Com
pass
3.01
0.90
2.57
0.98
186.
Bru
shes
3.42
0.70
3.21
0.80
187.
Tec
hnic
al p
ens
and
penc
ils2.
970.
902.
720.
96
188.
Lase
r di
sc1.
000.
95
189.
Com
pute
r2.
880.
962.
870.
99
190.
Mod
em0.
991.
09
191.
VC
R2.
860.
892.
690.
93
192.
Vid
eo c
amer
a2.
650.
912.
850.
87
193.
Cam
era
2.91
0.86
3.06
0.81
194.
Pro
ject
ion
equi
pmen
t (e.
g., s
lide,
ove
rhea
d)3.
160.
823.
220.
83
195.
Sca
nner
1.00
0.94
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
196.
Pho
tost
ats
2:$o
-0.
980.
92
197.
Layo
ut ti
pag
e de
sign
2.67
0.94
2.81
0.97
198.
Pas
te u
p/m
echa
nica
ls2.
550.
992.
660.
94
199.
Edi
ting
x.47
1.01
2.52
0.96
200.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f com
mun
icat
ion
arts
(te
chno
logy
/med
ia)
3.01
0.77
2.97
0.80
CE
RA
MIC
S
Typ
es
201.
Pot
tery
3.49
0.66
3.35
0.74
202.
Tile
s2.
750.
882.
460.
98
203.
Scu
lptu
re3.
390.
693.
390.
70
90E
ll91
![Page 83: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
92
Tea
c he
rsN
=1
43
Col
lege
Fac
ulty
N=
71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
204.
Con
tain
ers
3.06
0.81
2.91
0.90
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia a
nd M
ater
ials
205.
Cla
y3.
580.
643.
530.
68
206.
Pot
ter's
whe
el3.
170.
862.
980.
81
207.
Slip
3.18
0.89
3.05
0.88
208.
Gla
ze3.
420.
733.
210.
77
209.
Mol
d2.
611.
16;2
461.
11
210.
Kiln
3.50
'0.7
43.
410.
76
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
211.
Sta
ges
(e.g
., Le
athe
r ha
rd, G
reen
war
e,B
isqu
e)3.
460.
803.
480.
77
212.
Wed
ging
3.47
0.73
3.38
0.80
213.
Firi
ng3.
490.
713.
420.
75
214.
Dec
orat
ion
3.34
0.77
3.20
0.90
215.
Gla
zing
3.40
0.73
3.29
0.84
216.
Han
d bu
ilt (
e.g.
, pin
ch, s
lab,
coi
l)3.
530.
663.
550.
73
217.
Cas
ting
2.65
1.05
2.59
LOB
218.
Whe
el th
row
n3.
080.
893.
030.
84
219.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f cer
amic
s3.
470.
633.
440.
73
CR
AF
TS
/JE
WE
LRY
Tes
220.
Sta
ined
gla
ss''.
2.2
20.
95.::
20:-
0.98
221.
Mos
aic
2.61
1.01
.:.3O
.'1"
1.01
222.
Pap
erm
akin
g2.
610.
94.1
12.4
41.:
1.03
223.
Met
al je
wel
ry: 2
.35.
1.04
:::,2
;33,
1.09
224.
Cer
amic
jew
elry
2.51
0 95
.2.1
7:1.
00
225.
Pla
stic
jew
elry
2.46
1.07
1:48
.:0.
97
226.
Pap
er je
wel
ry2.
401.
032.
031.
06
E12
o
![Page 84: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Use
of T
ools
, Mat
eria
ls, a
nd E
quip
men
t
227.
Pla
stic
228.
Nat
ural
mat
eria
ls
229.
Met
al (
e.g.
, cop
per,
silv
er)
230.
Cla
y
231.
Fib
er
232.
Pap
er
233.
Ena
mel
s
234.
Kiln
235.
Saw
236.
Tor
ches
237.
File
s
238.
Cas
ting
mac
hine
239.
Sol
derin
g iro
n
240.
Sol
der
241.
Gla
ss c
utte
r
242.
Pug
mill
243.
Ele
ctric
ble
nder
244.
Tile
cut
ter
245.
Dec
kle
246.
Fel
ts
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
247.
Fab
ricat
ion
248.
Scr
imsh
aw
249.
Ena
mel
ing
250.
Scr
affit
o
251.
Ann
ealin
g
94E
13
Tea
cN
=1he
rs43
Col
lege N
=F
acul
ty71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
2.92
2.57
3.18
2.93
3.10
3.15
2.54
2.51
Z19
2.30
2.40
'
2.32
2.22
2.29
,
0.91
2.94
0.97
2.70
0.84
3.06
0.91
2.89
0.85
0.99
0.95
2.92
1.02
2.77
2.95
1.05
1.03
1.07
1.05
1.06
1.03
1.15
1.09
1.04
1.03
1.02
1.05
1.01
1.01
0.99
1.07
2.50
2.68
2.18
2-3S
2.45
2..1
7
2.35
2,39
1.93
241
2.','
2
, 2;29
:-
2.27
0.90
0.91
0.89
1.02
0.98
0.98
1.00
1.03
0.99
1.04
1.03
1.13
1.00
1.00
1.05
0.96
1.04
0.95
1.01
1.02
95
0.93
0.97
0.87
0.89
0.94
![Page 85: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Tea
c he
rsN
=1
43C
olle
ge F
acul
tyN
71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
252.
Saw
ing
2.33
1.04
2.58
0.98
253.
Pie
rcin
g2:
301.
042.
520.
95
254.
Sol
derin
g2.
351.
062.
560.
99
255.
Cas
ting
2.33
1.04
2.32
1.03
256.
Lam
inat
ion
2.23
1.02
2.35
0.30
257.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f cra
fts/je
wel
ry2.
550.
952.
600.
95
FIB
ER
AR
TS
Typ
es
258.
Con
stru
cted
(e.
g., w
eavi
ng, b
aske
try)
2.72
0.95
2.77
0.91
259.
Sur
face
dec
orat
ion
(e.g
., B
atik
, stit
cher
y, p
rinte
d)2.
900.
872.
890.
88
260.
Cas
t (e.
g., p
aper
mak
ing)
2.58
0.91
2.58
0.95
Use
of T
ools
, Mat
eria
ls, a
nd E
quip
men
t
261.
Loo
m2.
710.
982.
620.
99
262.
Yar
ns2.
780.
972.
610.
96
263.
Wax
2.59
0.96
2.45
0.98
264.
Dye
s2.
710.
952.
550.
95
265.
Fab
ric p
aint
2.64
0.9U
2.52
0.93
266.
Fab
rics
(e.g
., si
lk, c
otto
n)2.
720.
952.
580.
97
267.
Nat
ural
mat
eria
ls (
e.g.
, ree
ds, s
ticks
, she
lls)
2.71
0.88
2.70
0.91
268.
Tja
ntin
g to
ols
2.44
0.99
..2;2
7i0.
95
269.
Sew
ing
mac
hine
2.26
1.05
r2:;3
21.
01
270.
Mol
d an
d de
ckle
2.23
1.01
;.2 :2
00.
95
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
271.
Stit
cher
y2.
671.
012.
681.
02
272.
Tie
dr:
2.63
0.97
2.56
1.05
273.
Bat
ik2.
810.
942.
730.
95
274.
App
lique
2.46
1.08
2.5k
0.98
E14
![Page 86: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
275.
Mac
ram
e
276.
Qui
lting
277.
Bas
ketr
y
278.
Wea
ving
279.
Pap
er m
akin
g
280.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f fib
er a
rts
NE
WE
R A
RT
FO
RM
S
281.
Per
form
ance
282.
Inst
alla
tion
283.
Env
ironm
enta
l (ea
rthw
orks
, site
wor
ks)
284.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f new
er a
rt fo
rms
C.
Pre
sent
atio
n/di
spla
y of
art
form
s
D.
Hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y co
ncer
ns
285.
Dus
t (e.
g., c
harc
oal,
clay
, pas
tels
)
286.
Fum
es (
e.g.
, spr
ays,
mar
kers
, kiln
, rub
ber
cem
ent)
287.
Sol
vent
s (e
.g.,
turp
entin
e, la
cque
r)
288.
Tro
ts
289.
Dye
s
290.
Gla
zes
291.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f the
mak
ing
of a
rt
VII.
DO
CU
ME
NT
AT
ION
OF
PE
RS
ON
AL
AR
T M
AK
ING
Dem
onst
rate
the
abili
ty to
cre
ate
and
disc
uss
wor
ks o
f art
in th
e fo
llow
ing
area
s:
293.
Dra
win
g
294.
Pai
ntin
g
295.
Prin
tmak
ing
296.
Scu
lptu
re
297.
Cer
amic
s
EIS
Tea
cN
=he
rs43
Col
lege N
=F
acul
ty71
Mea
n
2.91
2.61
2.83
SD
Mea
nS
D
3.25
3.50
3.67
3.65
3.59
3.43
3.51
3.62
1.05
1.09
1.04
1.00
0.98
0.87
1.06
0.99
1.01
1.03
0.83
0.74
0.63
0.63
0.62
0.71
0.73
0.63
2.77
2.54
2.80
2.59
3.19
3.48
3.64
3.65
3.48
3.38
3.42
3.56
1.15
1.07
1.10
0.90
1.09
0.92
0.98
0.92
1.00
0.93
0.91
0.73
0.69
0.67
0.73
0.82
0.80
0.66
3.58
0.66
3.52
0.71
3.45
0.69
3.48
0.61
3.24
0.80
3.21
0.69
3.24
0.80
3.23
0.75
3.19
0.83
3.14
0.84
![Page 87: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
1.00
298.
Cra
fts/J
ewel
ry
299.
Com
mun
icat
ion
arts
(te
chno
logy
/med
ial
300.
New
er a
rt fo
rms
(e.g
., pe
rfor
man
ce, i
nsta
llatio
n)
301.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f doc
umen
tatio
nof
per
sona
l art
mak
ing
VIII
. PE
DA
GO
GY
SP
EC
IFIC
TO
AR
T
A. U
nder
lyin
g F
acto
rs th
at In
fluen
ce L
earn
ing
and
Inst
ruct
ion
303.
Com
plex
fact
ors
that
affe
ct th
e te
achi
ng o
f art
(e.
g.,
soci
etal
, cul
tura
l, et
hnic
, gen
der,
rel
igio
us, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic,l
ingu
istic
)
304.
Impa
ct o
f con
text
on
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d m
akin
g ar
t
305.
Com
plex
fact
ors
that
affe
ct th
e st
uden
t's le
arni
ngof
art
(e.
g., s
ocie
tal,
cultu
ral,
ethn
ic, g
ende
r, r
elig
ious
,so
cio-
econ
omic
,
lingu
istic
)
306.
Dis
cipi
ines
that
affe
ct th
e te
achi
ng o
f art
(e.
g., a
nthr
opol
ogy,
hist
ory,
phi
loso
phy,
psy
chol
ogy)
307.
Dis
cipl
ines
(e.
g., a
nthr
opol
ogy,
his
tory
, phi
loso
phy,
psy
chol
ogy)
that
affe
ct th
e st
uden
t's le
arni
ng o
f art
308.
Impa
ct o
f dev
elop
men
tal a
nd le
arni
ng th
eorie
s on
teac
hing
art
B. C
urric
ulum
: Org
aniz
atio
n an
d M
ater
ials
309.
Pur
pose
s fo
r te
achi
ng a
rt
310.
Pur
pose
s fo
r te
achi
ng p
artic
ular
con
cept
s, is
sues
,an
d/or
form
s in
art
311.
Rel
atio
nshi
ps a
mon
g co
ncep
ts, i
ssue
s, a
nd/o
r fo
rms
in a
rt
312.
Rel
atio
nshi
ps a
mon
g th
e ar
ts
313.
Rel
atio
nshi
ps b
etw
een
visu
al a
rts
and
othe
r di
scip
lines
314.
Sco
pe a
nd s
eque
nce
in a
rt c
urric
ula
for
a pa
rtic
ular
gro
upof
stu
dent
s an
d a
ratio
nale
for
them
315.
Com
mon
mis
conc
eptio
ns th
at s
tude
nts
have
abo
ut a
rtan
d ar
t mak
ing
316.
Uni
t and
less
on p
lans
in a
rt c
urric
ula
for
a pa
rtic
ular
gro
upof
stu
dent
s an
d ra
tiona
le fo
r th
e pl
ans
317.
Cur
ricul
um m
ater
ials
and
equ
ipm
ent f
or a
rt a
ppro
pria
tfo
r pa
rtic
ular
gro
ups
of s
tude
nts
and
part
icul
ar c
once
pts,
issu
esan
d/or
form
s
318.
Pop
ular
cul
ture
app
ropr
iate
for
part
icul
ar g
roup
s of
stu
dent
san
d pa
rtic
ular
con
cept
s, is
sues
and
/or
form
s in
art
(e.
g., c
omic
book
s, fi
lm, t
elev
isio
n, v
ideo
)
319.
Inst
ruct
iona
l tec
hniq
ues
appr
opria
te fo
r pa
rtic
ular
gro
ups
ofst
uden
ts a
nd p
artic
ular
con
cept
s, is
sues
and
/or
form
s in
art
(e.
g.,
com
pute
r, v
ideo
disc
, int
erac
tive
tele
visi
on)
E16
Tea
c he
rsN
=1
43C
olle
ge F
acul
tyN
- 71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
2.81
1.00
2.77
0.96
2.87
0.91
2.79
0.87
1.08
0.94
3.35
0.70
3.34
0.69
3.28
0.79
3.54
0.66
3.26
0.72
3.44
0.66
3.38
0.73
3.53
0.66
3.10
0.81
3.15
0.76
3.10
0.89
3.18
0.75
3.18
0.82
3.46
0.68
3.67
0.57
3.64
0.57
3.57
0.63
3.58
0.63
3.23
0.69
3.34
0.71
3.26
0.69
3.25
0.72
3.30
0.77
3.40
0.69
3.44
0.72
3.63
0.65
3.31
0.79
3.25
0.72
3.56
0.63
3.59
0.70
3.58
0.65
3.53
0.61
3.10
0.77
3.04
0.84
3.24
0.81
3.12
0.86
![Page 88: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
C. R
esou
rces
320.
Cul
tura
l ins
titut
ions
(e.
g., m
useu
ms,
gal
lerie
s, c
omm
unity
cen
ters
, par
ks)
321.
The
art
wor
ld (
e.g.
, art
dea
lers
, art
crit
ics,
col
lect
ors)
322.
Hum
an r
esou
rces
te.g
., ar
tistic
, eld
ers,
gal
lery
dire
ctor
s, c
omm
unity
age
ncy
pers
onne
l)
323.
Env
ironm
ent (
e.g.
, cla
ssro
om, s
choo
l, co
mm
unity
).
D. I
nstr
uctio
n
324.
Kno
wle
dge,
exp
erie
nce,
and
ski
lls th
at s
tude
nts
brin
g to
var
ious
con
cept
s, is
sues
and
/or
form
s in
art
325.
Kno
wle
dge,
exp
erie
nce,
and
ski
lls th
at s
tude
nts
need
for
vario
us c
once
pts,
issu
es a
nd/o
r fo
rms
in a
rt
326.
Div
erse
way
s of
exp
lain
ing/
pres
entin
g ar
t tha
t mak
e th
e su
bjec
t mat
ter
unde
rsta
ndab
le a
nd in
tere
stin
g to
par
ticul
ar g
roup
s of
stud
ents
(e.
g., m
odel
ing,
met
apho
rs, a
nalo
gies
, dra
win
gs, p
erfo
rman
ce, s
lides
)
327.
Str
ateg
ies
and
activ
ities
rel
ated
to s
peci
fic a
rt o
bjec
tives
app
ropr
iate
for
part
icul
ar g
roup
s of
stu
dent
s (e
.g.,
rese
arch
,br
ains
torm
ing,
que
stio
ning
, sup
ervi
sed
prac
tice,
gro
up w
ork,
lect
ure)
E.
Ass
essm
ent
328.
Eva
luat
ion
stra
tegi
es to
ass
ess
stud
ent p
erfo
rman
ce in
art
(e.
g., p
ortfo
lios,
obs
erva
tions
, int
ervi
ews,
dis
cuss
ions
, ess
ays,
test
s,jo
urna
ls, s
ketc
h bo
oks,
per
form
ance
s)
F.
Pro
fess
iona
l Con
cern
s R
elat
ed to
Tea
chin
g a
Par
ticul
ar C
onte
nt A
rea
329.
Pro
fess
iona
l and
sch
olar
ly li
tera
ture
app
ropr
iate
for
art t
each
ers
and
stud
ents
330.
Pro
fess
iona
l and
sch
olar
ly o
rgan
izat
ions
for
art t
each
ers
and
stud
ents
331.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f ped
agog
y sp
ecifi
c to
art
102
E 1
7
Tea
c he
rs.
N =
' 43
Col
lege
Fac
ulty
N =
71
Mea
nS
DM
ean
SD
3.39
0.71
3.51
0.59
2.74
0.90
2.60
0.89
3.01
0.86
3.04
0.73
3.46
0.67
3.36
0.71
3.34
0.73
3.40
0.65
3.47
0.67
3.46
0.58
3.70
0.52
3.71
0.49
3.64
0.54
3.67
0.53
3.50
0.66
3.59
0.58
3.15
0.70
3.26
0.78
3.05
0.80
3.30
0.91
3.46
0.72
3.58
0.60
103
![Page 89: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Appendix F
Importance Ratings for Demographic Subgrou_ps
'1 0 4
![Page 90: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
I. V
OC
AB
ULA
RY
OF
AR
T
1.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
pro
mot
e an
alyt
ical
and
met
apho
ric th
inki
ng
2.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
iden
tify
and
disc
uss
rela
tions
hips
am
ong
aest
hetic
s, a
rt m
akin
g, a
rt c
ritic
ism
, and
art
hist
ory
3.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
iden
tify
and
disc
uss
rela
tions
hips
bet
wee
n th
e vi
sual
art
s in
clud
ing
arch
itect
ure,
des
ign,
and
othe
r ar
t for
ms
(e.g
., po
etry
, dan
ce, m
usic
)
4.T
erm
inol
ogy
need
ed to
dis
cuss
art
form
s an
d te
chni
ques
5.T
radi
tiona
l art
ele
men
ts a
nd p
rinci
ples
6.C
onte
mpo
rary
prin
cipl
es o
f org
aniz
atio
n (e
.g.,
juxt
apos
ition
)
7.O
vera
ll ev
alua
tion
of th
e im
port
ance
of V
ocab
ular
y of
Art
II. C
ON
TE
NT
OF
AR
T
9.A
naly
ze a
nd d
iscu
ss h
ow th
e tr
eatm
ent o
f the
con
tent
of t
he w
ork
is r
elat
ed to
the
cont
ent a
nd th
e pu
rpos
e of
aw
ork
of a
rt
10.
Ana
lyze
and
des
crib
e th
e pu
rpos
e or
inte
nt o
f wor
ks o
f art
11.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
Con
tent
of A
rt
III. G
LOB
AL
TR
AD
ITIO
NS
IN A
RT
, AR
CH
ITE
CT
UR
E, A
ND
DE
SIG
N
A.
His
toric
al A
naly
sis
13.
Rol
e of
the
artis
t in
soci
ety
14.
Sty
listic
and
them
atic
influ
ence
s of
art
ists
, arc
hite
cts,
and
mov
emen
ts o
n on
e an
othe
r
15.
Sty
listic
and
them
atic
rel
atio
nshi
p be
twee
n ar
t and
cul
ture
with
in o
ne o
r m
ore
perio
ds (
i.e.,
colo
nial
ism
)
16.
Use
of p
rimar
y an
d se
cond
ary
sour
ces
(e.g
., ar
tists
' aut
obio
grap
hies
and
bio
grap
hies
, dia
ries)
17.
Tra
nsm
issi
on o
f cul
tura
l val
ues
thro
ugh
two-
and
thre
e-di
men
sion
al im
ages
and
form
s
Impa
ct o
f ext
erna
l for
ces
on a
rt a
nd c
ultu
re:
18.
Col
onia
lism
and
oth
er fo
rms
of d
omin
atio
n
19.
Gen
der
disc
rimin
atio
n
20.
Tec
hnol
ogy
21.
Eco
logy
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
5510
) 10
3.07
2.95
3.08
3.16
2.89
2.94
2.94
2.92
3.30
3.33
3.27
3.31
3.32
3.37
3.13
3.22
2.86
2.80
2.92
2.79
2.84
2.92
2.64
2.77
3.61
3.52
3.63
3.57
3.57
3.58
3.54
3.64
-
3.70
3.51
3.67
3.70
3.63
3.53
3.70
3.71
2.88
2.88
2.90
2;77
2.94
2.90
2.62
2.83
3.45
3.33
3.40
3.43
3.38
3.41
3.3.
53.
34
2.81
2.96
2.69
2.91
2.92
2.94
2.67
2.73
3.05
3.20
3.02
3.17
3.03
3.23
2.86
2.98
3.05
3.09
2.91
3.05
3.05
3.27
2.94
2.90
3.27
3.23
3.24
3.30
3.27
3.22
3.30
3.30
2.96
2.96
3.06
2.88
3.07
2.88
2.95
2.95
2.78
2.90
2.84
2.77
2.98
2.73
2.71
2.71
2.43
2.46
2.55
2.35
2.54
2.0
:2.3
72.
37
3.02
3.04
3.06
3.15
2.95
2.94
2.80
2.80
2.27
2.37
2.39
.2.2
42.
3a22
1'..2
,25
2,17
2.54
2.42
2.59
2.44
2.52
2,43
'2 .4
9:
.2.3
2
2.75
2.86
2.86
2.68
2.98
2.61
2.88
2.69
2.70
2.56
2.71
2.65
2.68
2.51
2.80
2.56
F =
Fem
ale
(N =
149
1; M
= M
ale
(N =
961
; NE
Nor
thea
st (
N =
52);
C =
Cen
tral
(N
=70
): S
= S
outh
ern
(N =
63)
, FW
= F
at W
est (
N =
52)
; 510
= L
ess
than
or e
qual
to 1
0 ye
ars
teac
hing
exp
erie
nce
(N=
53):
)10
= G
reat
er th
an 1
0 ye
ars
teac
hing
exp
erie
nce
IN .8
6). M
eans
bel
ow 2
.50
are
shad
ed.
F3
105
106
![Page 91: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
B.
Per
iods
, The
mes
, Sty
les
and
Mov
emen
ts w
ithin
Glo
bal T
radi
tions
of A
rt, D
esig
n, a
nd C
rafts
Afr
ica
22.
Anc
ient
art
of t
he s
ub-S
ahar
a (e
.g.,
rock
art
, ear
ly a
nim
ist t
radi
tions
)
23.
Anc
ient
Egy
ptia
n, N
ubia
n, a
nd E
thio
pian
art
24.
10 c
entu
ry A
.D. t
o th
e pr
esen
t (e.
g., t
he A
kan,
Yor
uba,
Ben
in, c
ontin
uatio
n of
ani
mis
t tra
ditio
ns)
The
Am
eric
as
25.
Pre
-Col
umbi
an, M
exic
o to
Per
u
26.
Nat
ive
Am
eric
an a
rt o
f Nor
th A
mer
ica
(e.g
., th
e P
acifi
c N
orth
wes
t, ea
rly m
ound
-bui
ldin
g cu
lture
)
27.
Eur
opea
n-in
fluen
ced
trad
ition
s in
the
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
and
Can
ada
28.
Eur
opea
n-in
fluen
ced
trad
ition
s in
Mex
ico,
Cen
tral
Am
eric
a, a
nd S
outh
^,in
eric
a
29.
Fol
k ar
t (co
ntra
stin
g tr
aditi
ons
of N
orth
and
Sou
th A
mer
ica)
Asi
a/O
cean
ia
30.
The
Indi
an s
ubco
ntin
ent (
Hin
du, B
uddh
ist,
Isla
mic
trad
ition
s, e
.g.,
in s
culp
ture
, tem
ple
arch
itect
ure,
min
iatu
repa
intin
g)
31.
Chi
na (
indi
geno
us tr
aditi
ons,
Bud
dhis
t inf
luen
ce, e
.g.,
in s
culp
ture
, cer
amic
s, s
crol
l pai
ntin
g)
32.
Sou
thea
st A
sia
(ada
ptat
ions
of B
uddh
ist t
radi
tions
, e.g
., in
tem
ple
arch
itect
ure)
33.
Kor
ea a
nd J
apan
(in
dige
nous
trad
ition
s an
d in
fluen
ce o
f Chi
na, e
.g.,
cera
mic
s, b
ronz
es, i
nk p
aint
ing,
woo
dblo
ckpr
ints
)
34.
Asi
an fo
lk a
rt
35.
Pac
ific
Isla
nd c
ultu
res
and
Aus
tral
ia
Eur
ope
and
the
Nea
r E
ast
36.
Pre
hist
oric
(e.
g., c
ave
pain
tings
, meg
alith
s, C
ycla
dic
idol
s)
37.
Anc
ient
art
of t
he M
edite
rran
ean
(e.g
., M
esop
otam
ian,
Per
sian
, cla
ssic
al G
reek
, Rom
an, E
trus
can)
38.
Ear
ly C
hris
tian/
Byz
antin
e
39.
Isla
mic
(e.
g., r
ise
of th
e no
n-fig
urat
ive
trad
ition
, Moo
rish
influ
ence
s in
Spa
in)
40.
Med
ieva
l
41.
Ren
aiss
ance
(bo
th n
orth
ern
Eur
opea
n an
d so
uthe
rn E
urop
ean)
42.
17th
cen
tury
(e.
g., b
aroq
ue)
43.
18th
cen
tury
(e.
g., r
ococ
o, n
eocl
assi
cal,
rom
antic
)
F4
10'1
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
.Tea
cE
xper
hing
ence
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
2.37
2.34
2.67
2.65
2.35
.2,3
8
2.55
2.87
2.92
2.61
2.74
2.46
2.76
2.90
2.57
2.53
2,39
2.32
2.69
2.64
2.48
2.31
2.57
2.86
3.06
2.70
2.67
2.52
2.92
2.97
2.62
2.74
24p
2,54
2.69
2:24
2.54
2.73
2.88
2.64
2.59
2.37
:
2.61
2.;4
9:
2,43
2.78
2.80
2.63
2.47
2.76
2.31
2.57
2.98
2.90
2.65
2.76
:-..
2.53
2.52
2.23
2,14
:
2.79
2.75
2.74
240
2.73
3.12
2.90
2.92
2.65
2.79
2.66
.2,3
7
2.62
3.09
2.79
2.80
2.67
2.87
2.98
2.90
2.63
2.88
3.31
3.04
3.06
230:
2.53
2.51
2,27
2.60
2.23
2.44
2.66
2.80
2,46
2.60
2.22
.:
,:.;
1(5
2.55
2,44
:2;1
4:.:.
245.
.
2:22
.4.2
6,2.
17
2.74
2.63
2.54
2.22
2.56
3.01
2.75
2.79
2.72
2.87
2.84
2.48
2.84
3.15
2.95
2.95
2.63
2.63
2.55
2,24
2.51
3.04
2.78
2.70
2.88
2.86
2.69
2.25
2.63
3.14
2.90
2.82
2.72
2.70
2.59
2,35
2.60
3.02
2.78
2.85
10 d
![Page 92: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
44.
19th
cen
tury
(e.
g., r
ealis
t, im
pres
sion
ist,
post
impr
essi
onis
t)
45.
Fol
k tr
aditi
ons
20th
Cen
tury
Mov
emen
ts
46.
Cub
ism
47.
Exp
ress
ioni
sm (
e.g.
, Ger
man
, abs
trac
t)
48.
Con
stru
ctiv
ism
49.
Dad
aism
50.
Fut
uris
m
51.
Sur
real
ism
52.
Fol
k ar
t
53.
Soc
ial r
ealis
m (
e.g.
, Rus
sia,
Chi
na, t
he A
mer
icas
)
54. '
Mid
20t
h ce
ntur
y: 1
945-
1980
(e.
g., p
op a
rt, h
ard
edge
, col
or fi
eld,
con
cept
ual a
rt)
55.
Late
20t
h ce
ntur
y (e
.g.,
phot
orea
lism
, pos
t-m
oder
n, p
erfo
rman
ce a
rt, p
opul
ar c
ultu
re, s
tree
t art
)
56.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f Glo
bal T
radi
tions
in A
rt, A
rchi
tect
ure,
and
Des
ign
IV. N
AT
UR
E O
F A
RT
/AE
ST
HE
TIC
S
58.
Def
initi
ons
of a
rt (
esta
blis
h an
d ap
ply
crite
ria fo
r id
entif
ying
art
)
59.
Nat
ure
of a
esth
etic
exp
erie
nce
(iden
tify
aest
hetic
crit
eria
and
app
ly th
em to
des
crib
e ae
sthe
tic e
xper
ienc
e)
60.
Mea
ning
in a
rt (
inte
rpre
t nar
rativ
e co
nten
t, im
ager
y, s
ymbo
lism
, and
em
otio
nal a
ffect
of w
orks
of a
rt)
61.
Aes
thet
ics
(iden
tify,
inte
rpre
t, an
d ap
ply
wid
ely
know
n th
eorie
s of
aes
thet
ics,
e.g
., th
eorie
s of
Rud
olph
Arn
heim
,S
uzan
ne L
ange
r, H
arry
S. B
roud
y, K
arl M
arx)
62.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
Nat
ure
of A
rt/A
esth
etic
s
V. T
HE
CR
ITIC
ISM
OF
AR
T
64.
Des
crib
e, a
naly
ze, i
nter
pret
, eva
luat
e, ju
dge,
and
crit
ique
wor
ks o
f art
65.
Des
crib
e th
e ro
le a
nd fu
nctio
n of
the
art c
ritic
66.
Rea
d, in
terp
ret,
and
eval
uate
art
crit
icis
m a
s pa
rt o
f the
pro
cess
of a
pply
ing
that
crit
icis
m to
wor
ks o
f art
67.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f The
Crit
icis
m o
r A
rt
VI.
TH
E M
AK
ING
OF
AR
T
A.
The
Cre
ativ
e P
roce
ss
B.
Art
For
ms
F5
1 0
9
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
3.17
3.14
3.31
3.10
3.20
3.08
3.22
3.13
2.84
2.53
2.73
2.71
2.74
2.69
2.86
2.63
3.17
3.12
3.25
3.19
3.15
3.04
3.14
3.07
3.14
3.11
3.21
3.22
3.15
2.96
3.18
3.07
2.87
2.82
2.92
2.82
2.89
2.77
2.84
2.79
2.83
2.75
2.94
2.79
2.81
2.68
2.78
2.68
2.86
2.73
2.98
2.82
2.77
2.67
2.84
2.71
3.08
2.96
3.15
3.06
3.10
2.82
3.18
2.98
2.95
2.62
2.81
2.88
2.77
2.79
3.02
2.76
2.80
2.69
2.84
2.82
2.69
2.67
2.84
2.67
3.13
3.22
3.22
3.25
3.08
3.13
3.12
3.11
3.13
3.22
3.27
3.27
3.03
3.06
3.10
3.13
3.24
3.19
3.27
3.31
3.26
3.06
3.31
3.14
3.26
3.23
3.21
3.32
3.19
3.26
3.24
3.26
3.07
2.96
3.00
3.04
3.11
2.89
2.86
3.00
3.38
3.20
3.27
..3.
403.
243.
363.
393.
16
2.96
2.99
3.05
2.96
2.95
2.89
2.80
2.97
3.43
3.35
3.42
3.52
3.37
3.21
3.29
3.34
2.71
2.56
2.69
2.72
2.68
2.65
2.64
2.81
2.65
2.81
2.74
2.74
2.63
2.59
2.78
3.04
3.04
3.00
3.13
3.16
2.77
2.90
3.05
3.81
3.76
3.83
3.79
3.80
3.73
3.81
3.78
1 i 0
![Page 93: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
DR
AW
ING
Kin
ds o
f Dra
win
gs (
e.q.
, fig
ure,
nat
ure.
per
son-
mad
e en
viro
nmen
t)
69.
Fro
m o
bser
vatio
n
70.
Fro
m im
agin
atio
n
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia, a
nd M
ater
ials
71.
Gra
phite
(pe
ncil)
72.
Col
ored
pen
cil
73.
Cra
yon
74.
Cha
rcoa
l
75.
Con
te
76.
Cha
lk
77.
Pas
tel
78.
Oil
past
el
79.
Wat
erco
lor
80.
Pen
/bru
sh a
nd in
k
81.
Fel
t tip
pen
82.
Too
ls fo
r co
mpu
ter
draw
ing
(e.g
., m
ouse
, lig
ht p
en)
83.
Sur
face
s (e
.g.,
pape
r, fa
bric
, hum
an b
ody)
84.
Era
sers
85.
Fix
ativ
es/s
olve
nts
86.
Bru
shes
Tec
hniq
ues
or M
etho
ds
87.
Scr
atch
boar
d
88. W
ash
89.
Mix
ed m
edia
90.
Line
(e.
g., c
onto
ur, h
atch
ing,
ges
ture
)
91.
Val
ue/s
hadi
ng
92.
Car
toon
ing
F6
Se
xG
eogr
aphi
c R
egio
nT
eac
hing
Exp
er e
nce
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
3.71
3.68
3.78
3.72
3.73
3.55
3.74
3.76
3.61
3.57
3.67
3.65
3.62
3.45
3.68
3.65
3.64
3.57
3.69
3.65
3.52
3.63
3.68
3.68
3.23
3.01
3.25
3.10
3.18
3.04
3.33
3.28
3.10
2.74
3.16
2.94
3.13
2.60
3.10
2.99
3.23
2.93
3.30
3.04
3.16
2.94
3.19
3.20
2.89
2.76
3.02
2.78
2.84
2.87
2.87
2.93
2.88
2.71
2.86
2.81
2.89
2.86
2.96
2.91
3.15
2.89
3.16
3.01
3.11
2.87
3.32
3.07
2.99
2.77
3.00
2.93
2.90
2.72
3.12
2.89
3.39
3.38
3.48
3.33
3.49
3.23
3:47
3.38
3.33
3.14
3.34
3.17
3.38
3.11
3.33
3.24
3.08
2.86
3.18
2.94
3.00
2.87
3.21
3.02
2.98
3.00
3.00
2.97
3.02
2.87
2.92
2.91
3.28
3.04
3.40
3.09
3.32
2.96
3.29
3.17
2.92
2.92
2.65
2.77
2.57
3.00
2.85
2.82
442.
802.
592.
772A
8.2.
572.
86
3.45
3.21
3.57
3.29
3.38
3.19
3.52
3.38
2.72
2.51
2.82
2.56
2.62
2.50
2.92
2.77
3.32
3.11
3.34
3.19
3.31
3.09
3.38
3.26
3.49
3.36
3.50
3.45
3.44
3.36
3.58
3.37
3.68
3.56
3.58
3.71
3.64
3.60
3.75
3.67
3.74
3.58
3.68
3.72
3.66
3.65
3 81
3.71
2.63
2.34
2.52
2.54
2.52
2.47
2.79
2.65
1
![Page 94: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Sex
1-G
eogr
aphi
cR
egio
n
FM
93.
Com
pute
r dr
awin
g2.
842.
73
94.
Per
spec
tive
(e.g
., lin
ear,
intu
itive
, atm
osph
eric
)3.
513.
53
95.
Mec
hani
cal d
raw
ing
2,33
2;17
]
96.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f dra
win
g.7
23.
73
PA
INT
ING
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia, o
r M
ater
ials
97.
Wat
erco
lor
3.53
3.40
98.
Tem
pera
3.44
3.11
99.
Acr
ylic
s3.
393.
24
100.
Oils
2.81
2.80
101.
Adh
esiv
es2.
952.
67
102.
Sur
face
s (e
.g.,
canv
ases
, pap
ers,
wal
ls)
3.33
2.99
103.
Bru
shes
/kni
ves
3.37
3.04
104.
Sol
vent
s2.
952.
68
105.
Air
brus
h.2
.28
Tec
hniq
ues
or M
etho
ds
106.
Fre
sco
2,1
k1.
71
107.
Egg
Tem
pera
1.13
5
108.
Col
lage
3.35
3.15
109.
Mix
ed m
edia
3.45
3.36
110.
Res
ists
3.10
2.81
111.
Enc
aust
ic2.32
112.
Bru
sh te
chni
ques
(e.
g, w
ash,
dry
bru
sh, w
et in
to w
et)
3.58
3.43
113.
Impa
sto
2.41
2.48
114.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f pai
ntin
g3.
543.
52
PR
INT
MA
KIN
G
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia, M
ater
ials
, and
Equ
ipm
ent
115.
Bra
yer
3.29
3.09
F7
113
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e
NE
CS
FW
< 1
0)
10
2.82
2.88
2.87
.44i
,i3.
603.
623.
453.
34
33.
793.
793.
723.
60
3.50
3.28
3.28
3.04
3.02
3.26
3.40
2.84
2'18
3.42
3.33
3.35
2.77
2.72
3.13
3.10
2.76
3.57
3.44
3.43
2.70
2.92
3.33
3.36
2.93
3.37
3.20
3.17
2.64
2.61
3.00
3.07
2.74
2.74
3.58
3.80
3.65
3.52
3.42
2.63
2.96
3.38
3.33
2.55
2.91
3.58
2.56
3.73
3.45
3.25
3.29
2.84
2.85
3.16
3.24
2.95
3.30
3.21
3.48
3.08
2;88
3.58
2.66
3.56
3.37
3.35
2.94
2. 3.52
2.52
3.51
3.39
3.49
3.17
3.30
3.11
2.72
3.56
3.38
3.59
3.48
3.40
3.16
3.54
3.34
3.25
2.91
:249
:;:3.
563.
51
3.58
3.48
3.09
3.30
3.07
3.27
3.17
114
![Page 95: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
S x
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
c hi
ngE
xper
fenc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
116.
Pre
ss2.
993.
023.
202.
853.
152.
742.
883.
12
117.
Bar
en2.
832.
723.
122.
602.
902.
:413
:2.
612.
95
118.
Squ
eege
e2.
992.
893.
162.
843.
072.
682.
833.
06
119.
Ink
3.31
3.11
3.33
3.06
3.40
3.15
3.27
3.27
120.
Sur
face
s (e
.g.,
pape
r, fa
bric
)3.
353.
033.
353.
093.
343.
113.
373.
23
121.
Pla
tes
(e.g
., lin
oleu
m, c
oppe
r, p
lexi
glas
s)3.
103.
053.
182.
873.
253.
023.
023.
11
122.
Scr
eens
2.99
2.97
3.06
2.78
3.20
2.85
2.90
3.05
123.
Cut
ting
tool
s3.
16"2
.98
3.27
2.90
3,28
2.89
2.88
3.22
124.
Ben
ch h
ooks
2.74
2.51
2.88
2.50
2.79
2:39
.2.
612.
66
125.
Com
pute
rs2.
772.
782.
812.
792.
732.
772.
642.
80
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Met
hods
126.
Mon
oprin
t3.
253.
073.
203.
183.
253.
023.
253.
12
127.
Rel
ief (
e.g.
, lin
o, s
tam
ping
, woo
d, c
ardb
oard
, cal
logr
aph)
3.31
3.34
3.30
3.31
3.42
3.23
3.35
3.30
128.
Ste
ncil/
silk
scre
en/s
erig
raph
y3.
083.
103.
103.
043.
182.
963.
063.
14
129.
Lith
ogra
phy
2.57
2.56
2.63
2:46
2.64
2.54
130.
Inta
glio
(e.
g., e
tchi
ng, e
ngra
ving
, dry
poin
t)2.
592.
802.
742.
672.
77:
2.75
131.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f prin
tmak
ing
3.23
3.29
3.28
3.31
3.32
3.04
3.27
3.22
PH
OT
OG
RA
PH
Y
Use
of B
asic
Mat
eria
ls a
nd E
quip
men
t
132.
Cam
era
2.80
3.20
3.00
2.91
2.95
2.98
2.84
2.82
133.
Film
2.75
3.03
2.90
2.83
2.93
2.74
2.80
2.71
134.
Pap
er2.
632.
842.
822.
562.
312.
612.
682.
60
135.
Che
mic
als
(e.g
., de
velo
per,
sto
p ba
th, f
ixer
)2.
552.
812.
642.
562.
732.
652.
562.
57
136.
Enl
arge
r2.
522.
832.
622.
582.
682.
652.
562.
54
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Met
hods
137.
Prin
ting
(e.g
., bl
ack
and
whi
te, c
olor
, cam
eral
ess)
2.60
2.89
2.82
2.61
2.75
2.63
2.64
2.61
138.
Man
ipul
ativ
e (e
.g.,
hand
col
orin
g, m
ultip
le n
egat
ives
)2.
302.
582.
422.
442.
522:
152.
272,
33
139.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f pho
togr
aphy
2.65
2.95
2.85
2.65
2.90
2.64
2,58
2.71
F8
1170
![Page 96: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e.;
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
SC
ULP
TU
RE
Typ
es
140.
Fre
e st
andi
ng3.
323.
363.
363.
323.
363.
263.
373.
24
141.
Kin
etic
2.88
2.94
2.82
2.86
3.17
2.67
3.06
2.89
142.
Rel
ief
3.25
3.10
3.24
3.14
3.31
3.00
3.33
3.13
143.
Env
ironm
enta
l2.
912.
842.
942.
783.
072.
653.
042.
87
144.
Ass
embl
ages
3.11
3.08
3.14
3.11
3.24
2.85
3.10
3.06
145.
Pup
petr
y2.
842.
422.
962.
552.
782.
762.
66
146.
Per
form
ance
2.55
2:3
2.51
2.57
2.53
2.4.
6
147.
Con
cept
ual
2.79
2.76
2.90
2.60
3.02
2.51
2.76
2.80
148.
Inst
alla
tion
2.61
2.68
2.69
2.54
2.88
2.64
2.68
Use
of M
edia
, Mat
eria
ls, a
nd E
quip
men
t
149.
Cla
y3.
573.
413.
543.
453.
493.
573.
533.
40
150.
Pla
ster
3.06
3.01
2.98
3.00
3.15
2.91
3.04
3.02
151.
Pap
ier
mac
he3.
332.
953.
223.
063.
363.
043.
253.
14
152.
Woo
d2.
912.
932.
962.
862.
972.
812.
732.
90
153.
Sto
ne2.
213:
2.47
:2'
;
154.
Met
als
241.
2.65
2.58
2.53
155.
Pla
stic
s2.
472.
612.
542.
63
156.
Pap
er3.
483.
183.
503.
203.
363.
433.
513.
25
157.
Fou
nd o
bjec
ts3.
303.
003.
243.
083.
273.
133.
413.
08
158.
Fib
er3.
182.
683.
202.
862.
952.
893
162.
96
159.
Wire
3.08
2.72
3.08
2.86
3.00
2.77
3.04
2.95
160.
Kiln
3.39
3.23
3.27
3.23
3.39
3.40
3.35
3.32
161.
Too
ls (
e.g.
, cut
ting
tool
s, c
arvi
ng to
ols)
3.35
3.16
3.44
3.14
3.31
3.21
3.37
3.28
162.
Arm
atur
es2.
912.
853.
022.
813.
022.
622.
942.
88
Tec
hniq
ues
or M
etho
ds
163.
Add
itive
:3.3
93.
443.
463.
483.
393.
283.
453.
35
F9
117
118
![Page 97: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
S x
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
164.
Sub
trac
tive
3.34
3.36
3.42
3.42
3.36
3.13
3.41
3.32
165.
Mod
elin
g3.
363.
383.
463.
383.
373.
213.
393.
34
166.
Cas
ting
2.83
2.95
2.98
2.70
2.97
2.79
2.75
2.89
167.
Con
stru
ctio
n3.
343.
313.
353.
323.
323.
313.
383.
28
168.
Impr
ovis
atio
n3.
082.
903.
132.
943.
002.
963.
023.
06
169.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f scu
lptu
re3.
423.
423.
503.
463.
423.
283.
423.
34
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
N A
RT
S (
TE
CH
NO
LOG
Y/M
ED
IA)
Gra
phic
Des
ign
170.
Pos
ters
3.35
3.04
3.46
3.06
3.35
3.08
3.38
3.21
171.
Cal
ligra
phy
2.92
2.76
3.12
2.57
3.05
2.72
2.79
3.01
172.
Adv
ertis
ing
3.01
2.96
3.10
2.90
3.08
2.86
3.11
3.06
173.
Illus
trat
ion
3.12
3.03
3.18
2.99
3.11
3.04
3.23
3.11
174.
Pro
duct
des
ign
2.77
2.79
2.68
2.70
2.95
2.72
2.91
2.83
175.
Pac
kage
des
ign
2.75
2.74
2.72
2.67
2'.9
02.
622.
892.
83
176.
Typ
ogra
phy
2.64
2.73
2.78
2.54
2.84
2.52
2.58
2.70
Med
ia A
rts/
Ele
ctro
nic
Art
s
177.
Com
pute
r gr
aphi
cs3.
033.
053.
103.
143.
022.
802.
923.
05
178.
Vid
eo2.
712.
852.
902.
65.
2.82
2.68
2.66
2.75
179.
Film
2.52
2.63
2.78
2:41
'2.
602,
462.
53
180.
Ele
ctro
nic
tran
smis
sion
(e.
g., f
ax, l
aser
dis
c,m
odem
s)2,
4t2.
5323
o24
24:
,:'2:
252A
0
181.
Pho
togr
aphy
2.80
3.06
2.96
2.87
2.95
2.80
2.83
2.72
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia/M
ater
ials
, and
Equ
ipm
ent
182.
T-s
quar
e3.
012.
603.
162.
702.
942.
582.
832.
99
183.
Tria
ngle
2.88
2.56
3.12
2.67
2.84
2.66
2.90
184.
Inks
3.21
2.87
3.33
2.87
3.18
2.98
3.15
3.11
185.
Com
pass
3.00
2.56
3.24
2.74
2.75
2.60
2.85
3.12
186.
Bru
shes
3.49
3.24
3.58
3.23
3.44
3.34
3.45
3.39
187.
Tec
hnic
al p
ens
and
penc
ils3.
022.
773.
022.
753.
102.
822.
912.
99
FIO
1
![Page 98: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
s 10
) 10
188.
Lase
r di
sc2
:1'5
2.40
2,48
2.45
2,1
7.2
.45
189.
Com
pute
r2.
882.
972.
983.
002.
922.
662.
752.
96
190.
Mod
em2.
382,
372.
552.
24 .2
.41
2..2
5'2.
322.
48
191.
VC
R2.
912.
812.
942.
782.
852.
882.
792.
89
192.
Vid
eo c
amer
a2.
762.
882.
842.
67.
2.1'
72.
882.
552.
73
193.
Cam
era
2.99
3.02
3.15
2.94
3.15
2.78
2.91
2.93
194.
Pro
ject
ion
equi
pmen
t (e.
g., s
lide.
ove
rhea
d)3.
243.
133.
213.
223.
183.
18:3
.21
3.15
195.
Sca
nner
2.36
.2.
472,
422:
3024
0 .
249
2:21
2.38
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
196.
Pho
tost
ats
2.33
2.24
2.54
2.15
2.26
;
197.
Layo
ut &
pag
e de
sign
2.66
2.85
2.89
2.64
2.79
2.62
2.58
2.71
198.
Pas
te u
p/m
echa
nica
ls2.
562.
692.
812.
712.
60
199.
Edi
ting
2.51
2.51
2.69
2.64
2.38
2.51
200.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f com
mun
icat
ion
arts
(te
chno
logy
/med
ia)
3.04
3.05
3.26
2.92
3.05
2.96
2.96
3.05
CE
RA
MIC
S
Typ
es
201.
Pot
tery
3.52
3.37
3.54
3.43
3.43
3.44
3.45
3.52
202.
Tile
s2.
762.
512.
922.
542.
752.
792.
75
203.
Scu
lptu
re3.
433.
373.
453.
433.
363.
353.
493.
34
204.
Con
tain
ers
3.06
2.93
3.02
3.03
3.00
2.96
3.08
3.10
Use
of T
ools
, Med
ia, a
nd M
ater
ials
205.
Cla
y3.
593.
513.
623.
563.
513.
533.
553.
60
206.
Pot
ter's
whe
el3.
153.
063.
242.
993.
143.
063.
193.
18
207.
Slip
3.29
2.83
3.36
3.03
3.12
2.92
3.23
3.16
208.
Gla
ze3.
413.
213.
483.
223.
373.
273.
423.
41
209.
Mol
d2.
642.
412.
802.
662.
.35.
2.53
2.68
210.
Kiln
3.53
3.39
3.52
3.49
3.42
3.45
3.49
3.51
121
F 1
1
122
![Page 99: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
I'3
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
c hi
ngE
xper
enc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
211.
Sta
ges
(e.g
., Le
athe
r ha
rd, G
reen
war
e, B
isqu
e)3.
493.
383.
563.
373.
473.
393.
403.
49
212.
Wed
ging
3.46
3.38
3.48
3.41
3.44
3.35
3.47
3.48
213.
Firi
ng3.
493.
443.
583.
443.
423.
453.
473.
49
214.
Dec
orat
ion
3.32
3.26
3.38
3.26
3.34
3.14
3.36
3.34
215.
Gla
zing
3.42
3.33
3.52
3.'3
43.
413.
243.
383.
43
216.
Han
d bu
ilt (
e.g.
, pin
ch, s
lab,
coi
l)3.
613.
513.
643.
623.
593.
453.
603.
57
217.
Cas
ting
2.63
2.57
2.90
204!
2.73
2.58
2.73
218.
Whe
el th
row
n3.
063.
073.
'2.
963.
102.
963.
093.
09
219.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f cer
amic
s3.
473.
463.
493.
423.
493.
453.
483.
46
CR
AF
TS
/JE
WE
LRY
Imes
.
220.
Sta
ined
gla
ss2
221.
Mos
aic
2.58
2.59
2.56
2.87
222.
Pap
erm
akin
g2.
812.
57...
.1.
442.
632,
492.
742.
51
223.
Met
al je
wel
ry2,
22
224.
Cer
amic
jew
elry
2.18
2..2
92.
582,
222.
57
225.
Pla
stic
jew
elry
2,18
1,83
.2.0
41
226.
Pap
er je
wel
ryZ
?1-1
302,
43is
Use
of T
ools
, Mat
eria
ls, a
nd E
quip
men
t
227.
Pla
stic
2.30
2'40
4134
228.
Nat
ural
mat
eria
ls2.
972.
842.
962.
813.
022.
843.
152.
77
229.
Met
al (
e.g.
, cop
per,
silv
er)
2.52
2.70
2.50
2.53
2.64
2.63
2.68
230.
Cla
y3.
223.
073.
263.
073.
193.
103.
253.
13
231.
Fib
er3.
032.
743.
142.
822.
952.
762.
982.
88
232.
Pap
er3.
202.
843.
242.
943.
073.
003.
322.
95
233.
Ena
mel
s2.
462.
302.
522:
202,49
2.24
2.66
2.38
234.
Kiln
3.16
2.94
3.10
2.99
3.07
3.14
3.23
3.09
F l
2
![Page 100: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
235.
Saw
236.
Tor
ches
237.
File
s
238.
Cas
ting
mac
hine
239.
Sol
derin
g iro
n
240.
Sol
der
241.
Gla
ss c
utte
r
242.
Pug
mill
243.
Ele
ctric
ble
nder
244.
Tile
cut
ter
245.
Dec
kle
246.
Fel
ts
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
247.
Fab
ricat
ion
248.
Scr
imsh
aw
249.
Ena
mel
ing
250.
Scr
affit
o
251.
Ann
ealin
g
252.
Saw
ing
253.
Pie
rcin
g
254.
Sol
derin
g
255.
Cas
ting
256.
Lam
inat
ion
257.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f cra
fts/je
wel
ry
FIB
ER
AR
TS
Typ
es
258
Con
stru
cted
(e
g.. w
eavi
ng. b
aske
try/
75E
+S
urfa
ce d
ecor
atio
n (e
.(1
Bat
ik. s
mith
ery.
nrin
zedi
125
F.
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e
FM
NE
CS
10}
10
2.59
2.66
2:58
2,04
2.55
2.58
2.52
2.40
2,40
:
.2.3
1M
S 2
.13
2, 2
32;
302.
00
::2:4
32.
162.
31
'::4.
201,
382,
14
1.92
207
]:]2V
2,10
2,37
2.39
:240
::: 2
.51
249
2.42
>2Y
31
2.30
:- *
202.
582.
56
2.02
2.21
2,28
2.15
2.29
Z26
2.31
2.21
2.65
2.50
2.66
2.67
2.58
2.55
::.:2
:;416
2.53
2.55
2.55
2.55
2.34
2.36
2.08
2.36
2.2*
2.05
1.98
2.22
1:40
-1,
32 j
1.36
2.17
2.23
2,27
2.28
2.23
2,12
242
2
243
2.33
2.39
2,32
2.22
2,30
2:1*
233
2.50
2.59
2.40
2 39
2.27
2.34
2.17
2,00
2 23
2,42
240
2.40
2.40
2.04
2-,1
3
2.17
2 60
108
2406
2.11
2,22
2.48
2.32
2,46
2,25
2.27
2.56
2.31
2.29
ZO
O
2.40
2.13
2.{0
2,40
2,26
:
2.33
2.39
.
Z3
i.;:;
2.26
:
2.55
2.85
2 56
2.88
2.64
2.82
2.56
2 85
2.64
2.96
2 77
2.96
2.88
3.03
2.60
2.94
2.87
126
![Page 101: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
260.
Cas
t (e.
g., p
aper
mak
ing)
Use
of T
ools
, Mat
eria
ls, a
nd E
quip
men
t
261.
Loo
m
262.
Yar
ns
263.
Wax
264.
Dye
s
265.
Fab
ric p
aint
266.
Fab
rics
(e.g
., si
lk, c
otto
n)
267.
Nat
ural
mat
eria
ls (
e.g.
, ree
ds, s
ticks
, she
lls)
268.
Tja
ntin
g to
ols
269.
Sew
ing
mac
hine
270.
Mol
d an
d de
ckle
Tec
hniq
ues
and
Pro
cess
es
271.
Stit
cher
y
272.
Tie
dye
273.
Bat
ik
274.
App
lique
275.
Mac
ram
e
276.
Qui
lting
277.
Bas
ketr
y
278.
Wea
ving
279.
Pap
er m
akin
g
280.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f Fib
er A
rts
NE
WE
R A
RT
FO
RM
S
281.
Per
form
ance
282.
Inst
alla
tion
283.
Env
ironm
enta
l (ea
rthw
orks
, site
wor
ks)
284.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f new
er a
rt fo
rms
F14
Sx
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
cE
xper
F
2.64
;2;0
;
MN
ES
FW
10
hing
ence ) 10
2.85
2.91
.2.6
6
2.79
2.76
2.81
2.81
2.65
242:
:: 2.
88
2.92
2:37
..;,;
2.73
2.51
2.77
2.65
2.83
: .
2.56
2,46
2.29
:'2;3
8.2,
142.
3024
2
-245
2,15
2,24
2 04
2.85
2.48
2:40
: 2.6
3
2.59
2.69
2.44
:
2.63
2.58
2.66
2.62
2.33
2.79
2.75
2.89
2.54
ziA
z
2.52
3.00
2.66
2.87
2.65
2,39
2.16
1,99
2.24
2.60
2.69
2,36
/.2: >
:2,3
6
2.81
2.81
2.85
2 63 /.4
/2,
01
Z.4
5
2.94
2.58
2.80
2.68
2.56
2.73
2,42
z.z/
2,Z
I
,2,Z
0
2.90
2.68
2.77
2.60
2.68
2.77
2.73
2.80
2,41
2.47
2,24
2.58
2.72
2.87
2 50
2.4/
2,11
2.54
2.89
2.64
2.82
2.82
2.66
2.61
.."2.
58
2,44
.246
.2;4
02.
73
2.52
2.56
2.50
2.60
2.56
2.32
2,14
2.16
2.50
2.89
2.21
249
247
2,37
2.59
2.61
2.74
2.67
2.52
2.81
2.83
2.63
2.71
2.65
2.67
2.73
2.36
21 2.69
2.73
2.96
2 50
z..4
a
2,40
2 62
3.12
2.71
2.94
2.62
2.72
2.57
2.69
2.66
2.72
2.67
2.50
2.66
2.57
2.75
2,43
2.40
2.77
2.52
2.77
2.1
2.57
2;34
. 12a
![Page 102: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
S x
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
c in
gE
xper
enc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
C.
Pre
sent
atio
n/D
ispl
ay o
f art
form
s3.
273.
173.
353.
223.
283.
073.
353.
20
D.
Hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y co
ncer
ns
285.
Dus
t (e.
g., c
harc
oal,
clay
, pas
tels
)3.
513.
473.
653.
473.
503.
353.
403.
55
286.
Fum
es (
e.g.
, spr
ays,
mar
kers
, kiln
, rub
ber
cem
ent)
3.67
3.66
3.78
3.68
3.61
3.63
3.62
3.69
287.
Sol
vent
s (e
.g.,
turp
entin
e, la
cque
r)3.
663.
673.
803.
713.
563.
613.
603.
70
288.
Too
ls3.
613.
483.
703.
503.
523.
583.
563.
61
289.
Dye
s3.
493.
363.
623.
373.
423.
393.
383.
45
290.
Gla
zes
3.58
3.40
3.58
3.40
3.55
3.57
3.52
3.50
291.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f the
mak
ing
of a
rt3.
643.
573.
703.
543.
623.
653.
633.
61
VII.
DO
CU
ME
NT
AT
ION
OF
PE
RS
ON
AL
AR
T M
AK
ING
Dem
onst
rate
the
abili
ty to
cre
ate
and
disc
uss
wor
ks o
f art
in th
e fo
llow
ing
area
s:
293.
Dra
win
g3.
593.
543.
693.
623.
503.
433.
693.
51
294.
Pai
ntin
g3.
493.
453.
603.
533.
383.
343.
603.
38
295.
Prin
tmak
ing
3.27
3.15
3.37
3.21
3.28
3.02
3.29
3.23
296.
Scu
lptu
re3.
263.
183.
373.
183.
233.
063.
273.
20
297.
Cer
amic
s3.
183.
133.
173.
143.
183.
133.
233.
18
298.
Cra
fts/J
ewel
ry2.
812.
792.
922.
612.
902.
792.
812.
82
299.
Com
mun
icat
ion
arts
(te
chno
logy
/med
ia)
2.82
3.00
2.96
2.79
3.07
2.68
2.79
2.92 ".
"
300.
New
er a
rt fo
rms
(e.g
., pe
rfor
man
ce, i
nsta
llatio
n)2.
522.
24 `
.2.
74:;;
:o
301.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f doc
umen
tatio
n of
per
sona
l art
mak
ing
3.34
3.42
3.45
3.40
3.39
3.23
3.42
3.31
VIII
. PE
DA
GO
GY
SP
EC
IFIC
TO
AR
T
A. U
nder
lyin
g F
acto
rs th
at In
fluen
ce L
earn
ing
and
Inst
ruct
ion
303.
Com
plex
fact
ors
that
affe
ct th
e te
achi
ng o
f art
(e.
g., s
ocie
tal,
cultu
ral,
ethn
ic, g
ende
r, r
elig
ious
,so
cio-
eco
nom
:3.
39
lingu
istic
)
3.32
3.47
3.33
3.40
3.28
3.44
3.19
304.
Impa
ct o
f con
text
on
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d m
akin
g ar
t3.
353.
273.
423.
263.
373.
243.
323.
22
305.
Com
plex
fact
ors
that
affe
ct th
e st
uden
t's le
arni
ng o
f art
(e.
g., s
ocie
tal,
cultu
ral,
ethn
ic, g
ende
r, r
elig
ious
,3.
45
soci
o-ec
onom
ic, l
ingu
istic
)
3.36
3.49
3.39
3.50
3.30
3.47
3.33
306.
Dis
cipl
ines
that
affe
ct th
e te
achi
ng o
f art
(e.
g., a
nthr
opol
ogy,
his
tory
, phi
loso
phy,
psy
chol
ogy)
3.10
3.07
3.27
3.14
3.17
2.90
3.16
3.06
307.
Dis
cipl
ines
(e.
g., a
nthr
opol
ogy,
his
tory
, phi
loso
phy,
psy
chol
ogy)
that
affe
ct th
e st
uden
t's le
arni
ngof
art
3.14
3.12
3.41
3.12
3.14
2.88
3.11
3.08
F I
5
129
130
![Page 103: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
308.
Impa
ct o
f dev
elop
men
tal a
nd le
arni
ng th
eorie
s on
teac
hing
art
B.
Cur
ricul
um: O
rgan
izat
ion
and
Mat
eria
ls
309.
Pur
pose
s fo
r te
achi
ng a
rt
310.
Pur
pose
s fo
r te
achi
ng p
artic
ular
con
cept
s, is
sues
, and
/or
form
s in
art
311.
Rel
atio
nshi
ps a
mon
g co
ncep
ts, i
ssue
s, a
nd/o
r fo
rms
in a
rt
312.
Rel
atio
nshi
ps a
mon
g th
e ar
ts
313.
Rel
atio
nshi
ps b
etw
een
visu
al a
rts
and
othe
r di
scip
lines
314.
Sco
pe a
nd s
eque
nce
in a
rt c
urric
ula
for
a pa
rtic
ular
gro
up o
f stu
dent
s an
d a
ratio
nale
for
them
315.
Com
mon
mis
conc
eptio
ns th
at s
tude
nts
have
abo
ut a
rt a
nd a
rt m
akin
g
316.
Uni
t and
less
on p
lans
in a
rt c
urric
ula
for
a pa
rtic
ular
gro
up o
f stu
dent
s an
d ra
tiona
le fo
r th
epl
ans
317.
Cur
ricul
um m
ater
ials
and
equ
ipm
ent f
or a
rt a
ppro
pria
te fo
r pa
rtic
ular
gro
ups
of s
tude
nts
and
part
icul
ar c
once
pts,
issu
es a
nd/o
r fo
rms
318.
Pop
ular
cul
ture
app
ropr
iate
for
part
icul
ar g
roup
s of
stu
dent
s an
d pa
rtic
ular
con
cept
s, is
sues
and
/orf
orm
s in
art
(e.g
., co
mic
boo
ks, f
ilm, t
elev
isio
n, v
ideo
)
319.
Inst
ruct
iona
l tec
hniq
ues
appr
opria
te fo
r pa
rtic
ular
gro
ups
of s
tude
nts
and
part
icul
ar c
once
pts,
issu
esan
d/or
form
in a
rt (
e.g.
, com
pute
r, v
ideo
disc
, int
erac
tive
tele
visi
on)
C. R
esou
rces
320.
Cul
tura
l ins
titut
ions
(e.
g., m
useu
ms,
gal
lerie
s, c
omm
unity
cen
ters
, par
ks)
321.
The
art
wor
ld (
e.g.
, art
dea
lers
, art
crit
ics,
col
lect
ors)
322.
Hum
an r
esou
rces
le g
., ar
tistic
, eld
ers,
gal
lery
dire
ctor
s, c
omm
unity
age
ncy
pers
onne
l)
323.
Env
ironm
ent (
e.g.
, cla
ssro
om, s
choo
l, co
mm
unity
)
D.
Inst
ruct
ion
324.
Kno
wle
dge,
exp
erie
nce,
and
ski
lls th
at s
tude
nts
brin
g to
var
ious
con
cept
s, is
sues
and
/or
form
s in
art
325.
Kno
wle
dge,
exp
erie
nce,
and
ski
lls th
at s
tude
nts
need
for
vario
us c
once
pts,
issu
es a
nd/o
r fo
rms
in a
rt
326.
Div
erse
way
s of
exp
lain
ingi
pres
entin
g ar
t tha
t mak
e th
e su
bjec
t mat
ter
unde
rsta
ndab
le a
nd in
tere
stin
g to
part
icul
ar g
roup
s of
stu
dent
s (e
.g.,
mod
elin
g, m
etap
hors
, ana
logi
es, d
raw
ings
)
327.
Str
ateg
ies
and
activ
ities
rel
ated
to s
peci
fic a
rt o
bjec
tives
app
ropr
iate
for
part
icul
ar g
roup
s of
stu
dent
s (e
.g.,
rese
arch
, bra
inst
orm
ing,
que
stio
ning
, sup
ervi
sed
prac
tice,
gro
up w
ork,
lect
ure)
1.31
F16
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
chin
gE
xper
ienc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
..c 1
0)
10
3.37
3.16
3.49
3.31
3.25
3.10
3.33
3.08
3 74
3.58
3.81
3.64
3.73
3.53
3.69
3.66
3.62
3.52
3.73
3.54
3.58
3.49
3.55
3.59
3.33
3.22
3.43
3.22
3.32
3.18
t -57
3.13
3.32
3.21
3.39
3.15
3.34
3.24
3.41
3.17
3.35
3.35
3.45
3.19
3.45
3.32
3.44
3.21
3.57
3.44
3.53
3.48
3.57
3.50
3.52
3.37
3.37
3.15
3.35
3.22
3.33
3.22
3.36
3.25
3.63
3.45
3.53
3.51
3.67
3.54
3.66
3.48
3.61
3.46
3.57
3.51
3.57
3.58
3.70
3.49
3.13
3.02
3.21
2.93
3.27
3.00
3.16
3.07
3.27
3.12
3.18
3.06
3.42
3.20
3.16
3.31
3.49
3.42
3.57
3.47
3.45
3.38
3.41
3.36
2.84
2.63
2.92
2.79
2.75
2.52
2.78
2.6e
3.12
2.97
3.13
3.03
3.07
2.98
3.14
2.94
3.50
3.37
3.53
3.38
3.45
3.42
3.66
3.35
3.45
3.21
3.56
3.23
3.44
3.20
3.29
3.35
3.54
3.32
3.59
3.38
3.44
3.45
3.43
3.48
3 78
3.58
3.77
3.68
3.73
3.63
3.72
3.69
733.
553.
693.
653.
663.
653.
713.
59
![Page 104: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Sex
Geo
grap
hic
Reg
ion
Tea
c hi
ngE
xper
i enc
e
FM
NE
CS
FW
10)
10
E.
Ass
essm
ent
328.
Eva
luat
ion
stra
tegi
es to
ass
ess
stud
ent p
erfo
rman
ce in
art
(e.
g., p
ortfo
lios,
obs
erva
tions
, int
ervi
ews,
dis
cuss
ions
,3.
58es
says
, tes
ts, j
ourn
als,
ske
tcn
book
s, p
erfo
rman
ces)
3.53
3.61
3.49
3.66
3.47
3.31
3.61
F.
Pro
fess
ior.
al C
once
rns
Rel
ated
to T
each
ing
a P
artic
ular
Con
tent
Are
a
329
Pro
fess
iona
l and
sch
olar
ly li
tera
ture
app
ropr
iate
for
art t
each
ers
and
stud
ents
3.27
3.08
3.41
3.13
3.29
2.94
3.10
3.16
330.
Pro
fess
iona
l and
sch
olar
ly o
rgan
izat
ions
for
art t
each
ers
and
stud
ents
3.24
2.96
3.29
3.06
3.24
2.90
3.06
3.03
331.
Ove
rall
eval
uatio
n of
the
impo
rtan
ce o
f ped
agog
y sp
ecifi
c to
art
3.60
3.38
3.68
3.42
3.58
3.34
3.48
3.44
1.3`
i
F17
134
![Page 105: ED 385 602 AUTHOR Norback, Judith Shaul; And …The final draft domain consisted of 8 major knowledge areas and 307 knowledge statements. The revised domain was subjected to verification](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070911/5fb289e067ea4a74c16dfa1a/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
51062-10443 Y14M3 271852