ed ro pfromm 1.0

Upload: turjo-hasan

Post on 06-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    1/26

    Index1

    Electrodialysis/Reverse Osmosis toRecover Dissolved Organics from

    Seawater

    Peter H. Pfromm, Tarl VetterDepartment of Chemical Engineering,

    Kansas State UniversityManhattan, Kansas

    E. Michael Perdue, Ellery Ingall,Jean-Franois Koprivnjak

    School of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesGeorgia Institute of Technology

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    2/26

    Index2

    Overview

    Introduction and Motivation

    Electrodialysis Reverse Osmosis

    Combined Process

    Process Characterization Experiments/Results

    Conclusions and Outlook

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    3/26

    Index3

    Source: NASAhttp://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/CarbonCycle

    Units: Gigatons C, GtC/yr(1 GtC= 109 tons of carbon)

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    4/26

    Index4

    Earth scientists would like to know: Composition of carbon reservoirs

    Origin/fate of carbon reservoirs

    The problem with DOC in the

    oceans: Only 1 gram of carbon in 1000 liters of

    seawater......

    Salt

    The approach: Engineers and scientists collaborate Develop a new separation approach

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    5/26

    Index5

    What is marine dissolved organic

    carbon (DOC)?

    ~30wt% of DOC is high molecular weight (HMW) >1000 Da

    ~70wt% of DOC is low molecular weight (LMW)

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    6/26

    Index6

    How do you detect marine dissolved

    organic carbon (DOC)?

    Not a trivial issue: reasonably accurate part-per-billion levelanalysis for organic carbon in a high-salt (chloride) matrix.

    Shimadzu TOC-VCSN high-temperature catalytic oxidationanalyzer

    Sample is acidified to remove inorganic carbon, thencombusted over Pt catalyst and CO2 is detected by infrared

    Many papers, book chapters, and meetings are dedicated to

    this issue. Perdue at Georgia Tech is one of the well knownexperts on this.

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    7/26Index7

    35 g/L salts

    ~ 0.001 g/L=1 ppm DOC

    Solid DOCsample

    Salt

    Water

    Process

    The issue: recover pure DOC for scientificanalysis. The problem: salt

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    8/26Index8

    State of the Art Recovery

    Ultrafiltration Adsorption Methods

    Pore

    Tangential Flow

    Water Salt LMW DOC

    Salt

    ~30% DOC

    Only recovers High Molecular WeightDOC (>1000 Da)

    Salt still present in final sample

    Seawater

    ResinColumns

    PorousNon-polar

    Resin

    Seawater withremaining DOC

    Only recovers select species (humic, etc)

    Must use pH or other method to desorb

    100-300 m

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    9/26

    Index9

    35 g/L salts

    ~ 1 ppm DOC

    Solid DOC

    sample

    Salt

    Water

    Process

    ReverseOsmosis

    Electro-

    dialysis

    New Approach:RO removes fresh water concentrating

    salt and DOC

    ED removes salt with minimal loss of

    uncharged species

    Freeze Dry

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    10/26

    Index10

    RO

    ED The Processes

    Electrodialysis Reverse Osmosis

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    11/26

    Index11

    Electrodialysis Spacers and

    Membranes

    Astom AMX/CMX

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    12/26

    Index12

    Electrodialysis

    +

    C C C CA A

    -

    Na+

    Cl-

    Cl-

    Cl-Na+

    Na+

    Na+

    Na+

    Diluate/Feed

    Diluate Return

    CathodeAnode

    Concentrate Return

    Concentrate

    +

    C C C CA A

    -

    Na+

    Cl-

    Cl-

    Cl-

    Na+

    Na+

    Na+

    Na+

    Diluate/Feed

    Diluate Return

    CathodeAnode

    Na+

    Concentrate Return

    + -

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    13/26

    Index13

    Electrodialysis Characterization

    Limiting Current (Ilim)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Conductivity (mS/cm)

    Limiting

    CurrentDensity

    (Amps)Reapp = 38

    Reapp = 90

    vRhapparent 4Re

    LimitingCurrent(Amps)

    Temperature: 25C

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    14/26

    Index14

    RO

    ED The Processes

    Electrodialysis Reverse Osmosis

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    15/26

    Index15

    Water

    Salt

    ~ Pure Water

    LowConcentration

    Feed

    HigherConcentration

    RetentateWater Salt

    Flow

    High Pressure

    Discarded Permeate

    0.2 m

    http://www.dow.com/PublishedLiterature/

    Reverse Osmosis

    Water

    Polyesterfabric

    120 m

    40 mMicroporouspolysulfone

    Polyamidebarrier

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    16/26

    Index16

    Spiral Wound RO Module

    http://www.purewaterplanet.com/images/ROMembrane.jpg

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    17/26

    Index17

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

    Conductivity (mS/cm)

    Permeate

    Flowrate (mL/s)

    180 psi

    205 psi

    150 psi

    120 psi

    90 psi

    60 psi

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0 50 100 150 200

    Operating Pressure (psi)

    Stage Cut

    0.99 mS/cm

    4.11 mS/cm

    7.80 mS/cm

    12.12 mS/cm0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0 50 100 150 200

    Operating Pressure (psi)

    Stage Cut

    0.99 mS/cm

    4.11 mS/cm

    7.80 mS/cm

    12.12 mS/cm

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

    Conductivity (mS/cm)

    Permeate

    Flowrate (mL/s)

    180 psi

    205 psi

    150 psi

    120 psi

    90 psi

    60 psi

    PermeateRetentate PermeateRetentate

    High FeedFlow Rate

    Low FeedFlow Rate

    Small StageCut

    Large StageCut

    m

    ssTCAKQ

    Reverse Osmosis Characterization

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    18/26

    Index18

    RO

    Unit

    ElectrodialysisStack

    Combined Process Operation

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    19/26

    Index19

    OverallDrive tosite Purge ED/ROsystems

    Freeze

    ~10 l

    Freeze dry

    NMR....

    Retrieve

    seawatersample(200- 400 l)

    ED/RO

    200 l seawater

    Hope for good weather!

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    20/26

    Index20

    Experiment Date Starting Concentration (ppm) Sample Type Experimental Objective

    7/12/2005 0.18 Artificial Seawater

    9/28/2005 0.11 Artificial Seawater10/18/2005 0.05 Artificial Seawater

    11/9/2005 0.01 Artificial Seawater

    3/6/2006 0.22 Artificial Seawater

    4/3/2006 0.06 Artificial Seawater

    5/26/2006 1.95 Brackish Water

    6/8/2006 2.24 Brackish Water

    7/3/2006 3.30 Brackish Water7/18/2006 1.20 Seawater (ship board)

    7/19/2006 0.93 Seawater (ship board)

    7/20/2006 1.19 Seawater (ship board)

    7/20, 7/21/2006 1.21 Seawater (ship board)

    7/21/2006 0.82 Seawater (ship board)

    7/22/2006 1.10 Seawater (ship board)

    7/23/2006 0.20 Blank (ship board) Examine DOC leaching7/24, 7/25/2006 1.22 Seawater (ship board) Adjustment of ED operation

    7/25, 7/26/2006 1.10 Seawater (ship board) Attempt total desalination

    7/26, 7/27/2006 1.02 Seawater (ship board) Examine high concentration

    7/27/2006 5.08 Brackish Water (ship board) Comparison of DOC recovery

    8/14/2006 0.96 Seawater Lab reproduction of seawater

    8/18/2006 1.08 Seawater Test new membranes

    Determination of operating

    parameters and modes

    Examine recovery of natural

    DOC species

    Recovery of DOC from various

    locations and depths

    Experimentation

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    21/26

    Index21

    Examples:

    Three shipboard

    experiments

    Start with 200 literseawater

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    200

    240

    0 2 4 6

    Time [hrs]

    DOC

    retained

    [mg]ED & RO EDED

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    0 2 4 6

    Time [hrs]

    %

    removed

    ED & RO EDED

    Salt

    Water

    ED f ll th li iti t d it

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    22/26

    Index22

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Diluate (seawater) conductivity [mS/cm]

    EDcurrent

    [A]

    initialseawater sample

    201 litersinitial ED only

    RO&ED: water removalbalanced by salt removal

    to maintain conductivity

    limiting

    current

    applied

    current

    final ED

    ED: follow the limiting current density

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    23/26

    Index23

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Diluate DOC

    Recovery (%)

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    Date of Experiment

    5-26 6-8 7-3 7-18 7-19 7-20 7-21 7-21 7-22 7-24 7-25 7-26 7-27 8-14 8-18

    Brackish

    Seawater Lab Lab Lab Lab Lab

    Summary

    24

    1421

    21

    15

    21

    17

    1526

    103

    67

    6

    3

    2

    Final DOC ppm

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    24/26

    Index24

    Conclusions ED/RO can recover a significant

    fraction of DOC from seawater(60%-90%)

    The process is fast, allowingtreatment of large volumes ofsamples

    We are able to reduce saltconcentration and water volume tomake a sample ready for freezedrying

    Preliminary results by NMR:

    differences from the high MWfraction that was previouslyavailable.

    Scientists and engineers thinkdifferently but can communicate

    and collaborate successfully

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    25/26

    Index25

    Outlook Examine the impact of

    temperature

    Further minimize losses to theED concentrate, possibly withdifferent membranes

    Examine modulation of the EDcurrent to optimize DOCrecovery

    Applications for recovery of

    sensitive molecules (proteins,enzymes)?

  • 8/3/2019 ED RO Pfromm 1.0

    26/26

    Index26

    Acknowledgements

    This work is supported by the National Science

    Foundation, Grants No. 0425624 and 0425603.(Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theviews of NSF)

    Dr. Mary Rezac who initiated the contact betweenscientists and engineers that made this work

    possible. Poulomi Sannigrahi for help at sea and in the

    laboratory.

    We would especially like to thank CaptainRaymond Sweatte and the excellent crew of theR/V Savannah for two great and productive

    cruises.