edition by mark lovewell and khoa...
TRANSCRIPT
Understand Economics
Chapter 8Income Distribution
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
2nd Editionby Mark Lovewell and Khoa Nguyen
Chapter Objectives
In this chapter you will:� learn about the distribution of income
among Canadian households, how this distribution is measured, and the factors underlying the distribution
� consider the causes of poverty and the way poverty is measured
� analyze the effectiveness of government intervention to change the distribution of income
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Canadian Distribution of Income
! Canada�s distribution of income can be shown using the a Lorenz curve.
! This curve is a graph showing the cumulative distribution of income for households categorized into five groups based on their income levels.
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Income Distribution in Selected YearsFigure 8.1, Page 196
Lowest 20%Second 20%Third 20%Fourth 20%Highest 20%
Average of total
1951
4.411.218.323.342.8
1961
4.211.918.324.541.1
1971
3.610.617.624.943.3
1981
4.510.917.625.241.8
1991
4.710.416.724.743.5
1998
4.39.9
16.024.345.5
AverageIncome(1998)
10 68824 57939 78060 593
113 374
49 797
Percentage of Total Pre-Tax IncomeReceived by Each Fifth of Households
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Lorenz CurveFigure 8.2, Page 197
Lowest 4.3Second 9.9Third 16.0Fourth 24.3Highest 45.5
Lowest 20% 4.3 (a)Lowest 40% 14.2 = 4.3 + 9.9 (b)Lowest 60% 30.2 = 14.2 + 16.0 (c)Lowest 80% 54.5 = 30.2 + 24.3 (d)
100% 100.0 = 54.5 + 45.5 (e) 60
60
0 20 40 80
Households (%)
Cum
ulat
ive
Shar
e of
Inco
me
(%)
20
40
80
100
100
Distribution of Household Income
Cumulative Distribution ofHousehold Income
Share of Income in 1998 (%)
Cumulative Shareof Income
in 1998 (%)
PerfectEquality
PerfectInequality
ab
c
d
e
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Reasons for Income Inequality
! There are three main reasons for income inequality (in addition to wage determinants)" risk-taking" ability" Wealth
! Wealth is more unequally distributed than income.
Distribution of Wealth in Selected Countries Figure 8.3, Page 199
Sweden (1975)
Canada (1984)
France (1986)
US (1986)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Top 1% Top 5% Top 20%
Shar
e of
Wea
lth H
eld
byT
op W
ealth
Hol
ders
(%
)
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Poverty Line (a)
! The poverty line is the income level below which a household is classified as poor
! In Canada, a household is considered to be poor if it spends more than 64% of its after-tax income on food, clothing, and shelter.
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Poverty Line (b)
! In dollar terms, the poverty line depends on the number of household members and the size of the community they live in.
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Poverty Line for Various Households Figure 8.4, Page 200
1 person2 persons3 persons4 persons5 persons6 persons7 or more persons
500 000 and over
14 51017 70522 39227 89031 17234 45437 735
100 000to 499 999
12 22314 91318 86323 43926 25829 02231 787
30 000to 99 999
12 03414 68218 57123 12925 85128 57331 294
Less than30 000
10 99513 41816 97021 13623 62326 11028 596
9 51411 60814 68118 28520 43822 59024 744
Urban Areas(categorized by size)
RuralAreas
Size ofHousehold Unit
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Incidence of Poverty (a)
! Poverty rates are higher among unattached individuals than among families, except for single-parent families with a female head.
! Unattached females and unattached young people (24 and under) have particularly high poverty rates
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Incidence of Poverty (b)Figure 8.5, Page 201
FamiliesUnattached Indiv iduals
Gender and Household TypeMarried couples with childrenSingle-parent families (female head)Single-parent families (male head)Elderly unattached malesNonelderly unattached malesElderly unattached femalesNonelderly unattached females
Age of Household HeadLess than 1818 � 2425 � 5455 � 6465 +
Education of Household HeadLess than high schoolGraduated from high schoolSome post-secondaryPost-secondary certificate or diplomaUniversity degree
Percentage of Households Belowthe Poverty Line in 1998
9.130.3
7.342.017.517.430.322.138.8
29.236.620.422.615.7
30.222.428.518.011.0
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Canadian Welfare Society
! A welfare society is one in which the government plays a major role in attempting to ensure the economic well-being of its citizens
! transfer payments and personal income taxes are the most important elements of Canada�s welfare society
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Transfer Payments and Income Equity
! Transfer payments are now usually based on the principle of means testing rather than universality.
! Transfer payments are greatest as a percent of income for the poorest fifth of households, but the second-poorest fifth of households receives the largest share of these payments.
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Transfer Payments and Income EquityFigure 8.6, Page 204
Lowest 20%Second 20%Third 20%Fourth 20%Highest 20%
Average of Total
Average TransferPaymentsReceived
6 6968 3676 8015 1764 258
6 260
Transfer Paymentsas a Percent ofTotal Income
62.634.017.18.53.8
12.6
Shared Receivedof Total Transfer
Payments
21.426.721.716.513.6
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Principles of Taxation
! There are two main principles of taxation" benefits received (e.g. gasoline taxes for
roadwork)" ability to pay (e.g. personal income tax)
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Taxes and Income
! Taxes are related to income in three possible ways" progressive taxes (which increase as a
proportion of income as income rises)" proportional taxes (which stay constant as
a proportion of income as income rises)" regressive taxes (which decrease as a
proportion of income as income rises)
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Taxes and Income Equity
! Personal income taxes are progressive, with the proportion of income paid in tax rising significantly with a household�s income level.
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Personal Income Taxes and Income Equity (1998) Figure 8.7, Page 206
Lowest 20%Second 20%Third 20%Fourth 20%Highest 20%
Average of Total
Average PersonalIncome Taxes
Paid
6712 6196 406
11 81527 768
9 854
Personal Income Taxesas a Percent ofTotal Income
6.310.716.119.524.5
19.8
Shared Paidof Total Personal
Income Taxes
1.45.3
13.024.056.3
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Doomsday Prophet
! Thomas Malthus formulated a theory of population based on two principles" food increases in an algebraic progression
(1,2,3�)" population increases in a geometric
progression (1,2,4�)
! He predicted that over time population growth would outstrip growth in the food supply with disastrous effects
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
The Malthusian Time ChartPage 210
YearFoodPopulation
A Malthusian Time Chart
111
2522
5034
7548
1005
16
1256
32
1507
64
1758
128
2009
256
22510
512
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.
Understanding Economics2nd edition
by Mark Lovewell
Chapter 8The End
Copyright © 2002 by McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.