editorial

1
EDITORIAL One of the functions of an international journal in the early childhood field is to raise matters of concern to both practitioners and researchers world wide. The articles selected for publication in this issue are diverse in nature but support the view that many of the challenges in the field of early childhood education are global and proposed solutions often have a common basis. Several papers revisit important issues relating to the quality of education and care of young children, highlighting the necessity to maintain close links with the family and recognizing the importance of the role that parents play in their children's learning. The changing role of women in all levels of society and the consequent change in family patterns has increased the demand for quality education and care for young children. In recent decades governments have shown an increasing awareness of the need to extend early childhood service provision to support both children and their families. However, economic constraints have, in many instances prevented the implementation of such support. Extended quality provision is needed for parents who work, but care must be taken to ensure that they are still able to be involved in their children's learning. There is firm evidence to suggest that this interest and involvement are closely linked to later academic achievement in many societies. It may be difficult for some parents to maintain close links with their child's educational institution, but part of the role of early childhood educators is to forge and maintain these links, so that they feel that their contribution is valued and supported. Nevertheless the concept of parental involvement in the educational process is not necessarily seen as desirable in some parts of the world where the prevailing government philosophy places a strong emphasis upon state and community rather than the family. In such societies educational philosophies are different and the article from Lithuania is a powerful reminder of how changes in government philosophy affect the relationship between preschool institutions and the family. Early childhood workers in one society often forget that their counterparts in other parts of the world see their roles differently. In concluding this editorial I would like to focus on the opening paper by Tricia David. She raises some serious questions about the research methodologies we use to evaluate theory and practice in early childhood education and concludes by attempting to open a dialogue. As we approach the millennium it is appropriate that we rethink some of our cherished beliefs and query our effectiveness. Our readership includes professionals working in a wide field of settings in many countries and, as Editor, I hope that you will use the Journal as a forum for considered debate. Audrey Curtis. May, 1996.

Upload: audrey-curtis

Post on 25-Aug-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Editorial

EDITORIAL

One of the functions ofan international journal in the early childhood field is to raise matters ofconcern to both practitioners and researchers world wide. The articles selected for publication inthis issue are diverse in nature but support the view that many of the challenges in the field ofearly childhood education are global and proposed solutions often have a common basis.

Several papers revisit important issues relating to the quality of education and care of youngchildren, highlighting the necessity to maintain close links with the family and recognizing theimportance ofthe role that parents play in their children's learning. The changing role of womenin all levels ofsociety and the consequent change in family patterns has increased the demand forquality education and care for young children. In recent decades governments have shown anincreasing awareness of the need to extend early childhood service provision to support bothchildren and their families. However, economic constraints have, in many instances prevented theimplementation ofsuch support. Extended quality provision is needed for parents who work, butcare must be taken to ensure that they are still able to be involved in their children's learning.There is firm evidence to suggest that this interest and involvement are closely linked to lateracademic achievement in many societies.

It may be difficult for some parents to maintain close links with their child's educationalinstitution, but part of the role ofearly childhood educators is to forge and maintain these links,so that they feel that their contribution is valued and supported.

Nevertheless the concept ofparental involvement in the educational process is not necessarily seenas desirable in some parts of the world where the prevailing government philosophy places astrong emphasis upon state and community rather than the family. In such societies educationalphilosophies are different and the article from Lithuania is a powerful reminder ofhow changesin government philosophy affect the relationship between preschool institutions and the family.Early childhood workers in one society often forget that their counterparts in other parts of theworld see their roles differently.

In concluding this editorial I would like to focus on the opening paper by Tricia David. She raisessome serious questions about the research methodologies we use to evaluate theory and practicein early childhood education and concludes by attempting to open a dialogue. As we approach themillennium it is appropriate that we rethink some of our cherished beliefs and query oureffectiveness. Our readership includes professionals working in a wide field of settings in manycountries and, as Editor, I hope that you will use the Journal as a forum for considered debate.

Audrey Curtis.May, 1996.