edu.sismadesimple.netedu.sismadesimple.net/board/2007statestudyandsurvey.pdf · office of...

2007 State Study and SurveyMonroe School District No. 103 Snohomish County, Washington

Dr. Ken Hoover

Board MembersTom MacIntyre, PresidentGreg AccetturoDebra Kolrud Jim ScottJamie Wright

Compiled by

Superintendent

OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONSchool Facilities and Organization

Old Capitol Building, PO BOX 47200OLYMPIA WA 98504-7200

(360) 725-6265 TTY (360) 664-3631

FORM D-1 STUDY AND SURVEY GRANT APPLICATION

The D-1 is an application for a grant to assist with the cost of preparing a Study and Survey of existing and proposed facilities in accordance with WAC 392-341-030 (Refer to Chapter 3 of the School Facilities Manual).

To determine if your district is eligible to receive a study and survey grant, please contact your regionalcoordinator.

SCHOOL DISTRICT INFORMATION

School District: Monroe No. 103 County: SnohomishAddress: 200 East Fremont Street Contact Person: Ralph YinglingCity: Monroe Telephone: 360 - 804 - 2679Zip Code: 98272 Fax: 360 - 804 - 2508

E-Mail: [email protected]

School districts are eligible for a study and survey grant once every six years.

The calculation of the grant is based on the following table.

CALCULATION OF GRANTOct. 1 Headcount EnrollmentExisting sq. ft. according to OSPI Inventory (Report 3)

Headcount Enrollment Categories

Enrollment of 1 to 500 $4,000 + $.03 / Sq. Ft. Enrollment of 501 to 3,000 $4,500 + $.02 / Sq. Ft. Enrollment of 3,001 to 10,000 $6,000 + $.0175 / Sq. Ft. Enrollment of Above 10,000 $9,000 + $.015 / Sq. Ft.

Date: Signature:School District SuperintendentDr. Ken Hoover

Return completed form to: School Facilities and OrganizationOffice of Superintendent of Public InstructionOld Capitol BuildingPO BOX 47200OLYMPIA WA 98504-7200

FORM D-1 (Rev. 9/01) Fax Number: (360) 586-3946

2007 Monroe School District Study & Survey

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Study and Survey replaces and updates the 2001 Study and Survey prepared by Hutteball & Oremus Architecture, Inc. The Monroe School District No. 103 engaged the services of Hutteball & Oremus Architecture, Inc. to provide consultant services for a study and survey in accordance with WAC 392-341-025. The key elements of this document includes the District’s education plan, enrollment projections, evaluation of existing facilities, a measure of the District’s financial capabilities, and a long-range plan to achieve these goals. The District has reviewed its capital facility needs as part of a Six Year Capital Facility Plan prepared in response to student growth projections, condition and capacity of existing facilities, and the districts educational plan. The District plans to put a bond referendum on the ballot in the Spring of 2009 for approximately $70,000,000 to $100,000,000 in response to the projected enrollment figures, identified educational program deficiencies, and for extending the life of selected current facilities. The bond is planned to cover the local share of the cost of these projects. The District intends to file additional D-3 Project applications for new and modernized facilities in the future.

0 03 Executive Summary.doc


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter I Inventory and Area Analysis of Existing School Facilities Chain Lake Elementary (CLE) Frank Wagner Elementary East (FWE) Frank Wagner Elementary West (FWW) Fryelands Elementary (FRE) Maltby Elementary (MBE) Salem Woods Elementary (SWE) Hidden River Middle School (HRM) Monroe Middle School (MMS) Park Place Middle School (PPM) Monroe High School (MHS)

Chapter II Long-range Educational and Facilities Plan Chapter III Demographic Data Chapter IV District’s Capital Funds Chapter V Existence of a Housing Emergency Chapter VI Racial Balance or Imbalance Chapter VII School Facilities Required and Urgency of Need Chapter VIII Modernization Chapter IX Deferred Maintenance Chapter X District’s Time-line Chapter XI Accessible Unused or Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring Districts Chapter XII Adjustments of School Attendance

0 05 Table of Contents.doc

CHAPTER I

WAC 392-341-025 (1) An inventory and area analysis of existing school facilities within the district, a description of the types and kinds of systems and subsystems used in those facilities and their physical condition.


AREA ANALYSIS SUMMARY

School Building Names Current Building Area ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

1. Chain Lake Elementary School (K-5) 46,207 sf 2. Frank Wagner Elementary School East (K-5) 27,500 sf 3. Frank Wagner Elementary School West (K-5) 46,418 sf 4. Fryelands Elementary School (K-5) 54,074 sf 5. Maltby Elementary School (K-5) 50,230 sf 6. Salem Woods Elementary School (K-5) 38,338 sf

TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AREA 262,767 s.f. MIDDLE SCHOOLS

1. Hidden River Middle School (6-8) 60,688 sf 2. Monroe Middle School (6-8) 84,997 sf 3. Park Place Middle School (6-8) 109,912 sf

TOTAL MIDDLE SCHOOL AREA 255,597 s.f. HIGH SCHOOLS 1. Monroe High School (9-12) 209,432 sf TOTAL HIGH SCHOOL AREA 209,432 s.f. TOTAL FOR ALL EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDINGS 727,796 s.f. OTHER DISTRICT FACILITIES

1. District Administration Office 2. District Warehouse 3. Transportation/Maintenance Facility 4. Central Athletic Facility 5. Sky Valley Education Center (Leased)

1 02 Area Analysis Summary.doc 2/27/2008


DISTRICT INVENTORY DESCRIPTION

SCHOOLS

Chain Lake Elementary:

! Site Size: approx. 29 acres

! Number of Teachi! Date of Constructio

ize: 900 sq. ft. stics: Capacity of existing holding tank limits expansion. The site

utside the current UGA which limits the possibility of onnecting to City sewer.

E

! Current Square Footage: 46,207 sq. ft. ng Stations: 21

n: 1990 ! Classroom S! Unique Characteri

is oc

rFrank Wagner Elementa ast:y

a! Site Size: ! Current Square Foota! Number of Teachi

ructioe: Varies

ue Characteri red site with Frank Wagner Elementary West and aintenance Facilities. Originally built as a middle school.

Has served students grades K-12 over the years. Auditorium was built with funds donated by Frank Wagner.

nds. Frank Wagner Elementary We

pprox. 5 acres ge: 27,500 sq. ft.

ng Stations: 11 n: 1938, 1954, 1990 ! Date of Const

! Classroom Siz! Uniq stics: Sha

M

School was built with W.P.A. matching fust:

approx. 10 acre

! Site Size: s nt Square Footage: 46,418 sq. ft.

! Number of Teaching Stations: 22 of Constructio 0

50 sq. ft. Shared site with Frank Wagner Elementary East and District Maintenance Facilities. School was rebuilt on the site of the

l. School site was

Fryelands Elementary:

! Curre

! Date n: 199! Classroom Size: 9! Unique Chara s: cteristic

first Frank Wagner Elementary Schoodonated by the Wagner Family

! Site Size: approx. 7 acres ! Current Square Footage: 54,074 sq. ft. ! Number of Teaching Stations: 22 ! Date of Construction: 2005 ! Classroom Size: 840 sq. ft. ! Unique Characteristics: Newest elementary school in the District. The site adjoins

the Lake Tye Park and the School District has an inter-local agreement for joint use of the playfields during normal school hours.

1 03 District Inventory.doc


Maltby Elementary:

approx. 9.5 acres

ction: rnized in 2005 ! Classroom Size: ! Unique Characteristics: mentary School

(which is now the current Maltby Café and other businesses). A forced main sewer extension is a possibility

is site to accommodate population increases.

! Site Size: ! Current Square Footage: 50,230 sq. ft. ! Number of Teaching Stations: 25 ! Date of Constru 1968, playshed in 1987, Mode

950 sq. ft. Replaced the original Maltby Ele

for th Salem Woods Elementary:

! Site Size: approx. 10 acres ! Current Square Footage: 38,338 sq. ft.

ng Stations: 20 n: 1980, 1987

900 sq. ft.

! Number of Teachi! Date of Constructio! Classroom Size:

e Characteristics: Named after an early Monroe area pioneer. Located in close proximity to the Wagner Mill site. Built with the

ntion of shared parking facilities with the Wagner ommunity Club. Designed to fit into rural environment and

“institutional” appearance.

! Uniqu

inteCnot to have an

eMonro Middle School:

approx. 5 acres ge: 84,997 sq. ft.

! Site Size:

uare Footaaching Stations: 33

of Constructio , 1964, 1967, 1980, 1990 aries

Originally built as a replacement for the original MHS, which was torn down at this site after a 1965 earthquake. School

zes buildings that were ool (annex, tech ed).

Hidden River Middle School:

! Current Sq! Number of Te! Date n: 1954! Classroom Size: V! Unique Characteristics:

was rebuilt at the original site and utilipart of the original sch

Size: ox. 25 acres 88 sq. ft.

: 20 uctio , 2005

:e two story addition

lace Middle School:

! Site appr

,6! Current Square Footage: 60! Number of Teaching Stations! Date of Constr n: 1999! Classroom Size 900 sq. ft. ! Unique Charact ristics: Master plan of facility accommodates a

expanding the student capacity to 800.

Park P

! Site Size: approx. 19 acres ! Current Square Footage: 109,912 sq. ft. ! Number of Teaching Stations: 43 ! Date of Construction: 1974, 1980, 1990 ! Classroom Size: Varies ! Unique Characteristics: Originally built for 600 students, grades 10-12. Site

originally was intended for a new junior high school. School served as the high school from 1977 to 1999.




ool: Monroe High Sch

approx. 33 acres e 209,432 sq. ft.

c! Classroom Size:! Unique Characteristics: Site obtained from the Department of Corrections. Monroe’s

only high school sits on top of a hill with sweeping views to the north, south and west.

! Site Size: ! Current Squar Footage: ! Number of Teaching Stations: 74 ! Date of Constru tion: 1999, 2005

840 sq. ft.

Leaders in Learning:

! Site Size: N/A ! Current Square Footage: 1,798 sq. ft.

ng Stations: 2

! Number of Teachiof Construction: Remodeled 2000

! Classroom Size: N/A racteristics ce to a remodeled

portion of the Districts Maintenance Building in 2000. OTHER PROPERTIES

! Date

! Unique Cha Program relocated from a leased spa

istrict in the early

Burke Hales Property: 32.7 acres donated to Monroe School District in the early

e Baseball Field: hich has a potential of the Park Place

ance field for varsity all.

rty: parated from school property; septic problems in area.

BPA Property: wer Authority to be

cated in the Sultan School District. It is also used as an outdoor education site

Memorial Stadium/ 10+ acres secured in the mid-1930’s as part of the complex Marshall Field for the original high school.

Central School: 3.5 acres – set aside in 1916 for the construction of the

newly established Monroe Unified School District. Closed to students in 1972. Currently used for District Administrative Offices.

Transportation: A transportation center of approximately 3,000 sq. ft. located on a 3.4 acre site on Main Street near downtown Monroe.

Lake Fontal Property: 2.7 acres donated to Monroe School D1900’s.

1900’s.

Park Plac 2.54 acres – Area may be developed wfor increased value. This was the site Grade School. It is currently the performsoftb

ke Prope res) – Land would need to be seChain La (South 14 ac

33+ acres – Secured from Bonneville Poused as an outdoor education site. Lo

for forest studies.

2007 Monroe School District Study Survey

School/Facility

MSD 2001 Study & Survey Current SPI

MSD 2007 Study & Survey Comments

Chain Lake Elem. (K-5) 44,457 44,457Covered Play x 1/2 1,750 1,750

Total 46,207 46,207 46,207

Frank Wagner Elem. East (K-5) 0 19,7741954 Annex Addition 0 4,9751980 Library Addition 0 2,751

Total 0 0 27,500 Converted from Frank Wagner MS

Frank Wagner Elem. West (K-5) 44,668 44,668Covered Play x 1/2 1,750 1,750

Total 46,418 46,418 46,418

Fryelands Elem. (K-5) 0 52,525Covered Play x 1/2 0 1,549

Total 0 54,074 54,074

Maltby Elementary (K-5) 42,210 48,4801987 Covered Play x 1/2 1,750 1,750

Total 43,960 43,960 50,230 2005 Additions

Salem Woods Elem. (K-5) 35,842 35,842Covered Play x 1/2 1,440 1,4401987 Classroom Addition 1,056 1,056

Total 38,338 38,338 38,338

K-5 Elementary Span Total 174,923 228,997 262,767

(continued)

Inventory of School FacilitiesMonroe School District No. 103

1 04 Inventory.xls

2007 Monroe School District Study Survey

School/Facility

MSD 2001 Study & Survey Current SPI

MSD 2007 Study & Survey Comments

Frank Wagner Middle (6-8) 19,774 0 Converted to Frank Wagner1954 Annex Addition 4,975 0 Elementary East1980 Library Addition 2,751 0

Total 27,500 27,500 0

Hidden River Middle (6-8) 38,798 38,798 38,7982002 Covered Play x 1/2 1,2202005 Gym & Music Addition 20,670 20,670

Total 38,798 59,468 60,688

Monroe Middle School (6-8) 17,568 17,5681967 Additions 56,747 56,7471980 Gym Addition 9,485 9,4851990 Admin. Addition 1,197 1,197

Total 84,997 84,997 84,997

Park Place Middle (6-8) 71,903 71,903 Formerly Monroe Junior High1980 Additions 13,733 13,7331990 Additions 24,276 24,276

Total 109,912 109,912 109,912

6-8 Middle School Span Total 261,207 281,877 255,597

Monroe High School (9-12) 184,468 184,468 184,4682005 Classroom Addition 24,964 24,964

Total 184,468 209,432 209,432

9-12 High School Span Total 184,468 209,432 209,432

Total District Inventory 620,598 720,306 727,796

Inventory of School FacilitiesMonroe School District No. 103

1 04 Inventory.xls

Building Condition Summary Report School: Chain Lake Elementary School Address: 12125 Chain Lake Road City: Snohomish, WA 98290-8643 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-794-3030

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 28073000200400 Approximate Acreage: 28.82 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Snohomish County Sheriff Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Fire Department Unincorporated: x Incorporated: Zoning: R-5

Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 46,207 S.F. Original Construction: 1990

School Capacity: Current Enrollment: (Oct. 1, 2007) 478.6 FTE 522.0 Head Count As determined by educational program and number of classrooms:

K Grades 1-5 SE Capacity Portables Total CR S CR S CR S CR S 4 96 16 396 1 0 492 4 100 592

*Grades K-4 average classroom loading at 24 students per classroom (K at .5) *Grade 5 average classroom loading at 28 students per station (includes music & PE) *Special Education – Only Life Skills students (severely disabled or medically fragile) are assigned to a classroom. All other students are

assigned to a regular classroom.

1 05 BCSR CLE.doc

1 05 BCSR CLE.doc

Construction History: Chain Lake Elementary was constructed in 1990 and is composed of four single story buildings connected by covered walks. It has had no significant upgrades, additions or modernizations. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a fairly level site in a rural neighborhood outside the County GMA. The site contains two ball fields, one grass play field and one soft play equipment area. Parking lots and drives are asphalt with concrete curbs. There are 98 on-site parking spaces. Fire hydrants are provided. The storm drain system is collected and dispersed through an on-site detention pond. The sewer system runs to a holding tank and is pumped bi-weekly. The play field area is fenced with chain link fencing and buildings are fenced with steel rail fencing. Landscaping includes shrubs and trees in planting areas. Site development includes outdoor seating. The unused portion of the site to the south contains an identified wetland. Preliminary reports identify this wetland and associated buffer to be of such a size that development of this portion of the site for a middle school with playfields is not feasible unless additional adjacent property is purchased. Another limiting factor for development is the site is outside of the current UGA and therefore does not have access to sewer. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The primary structure is single-story, slab on grade, wood framed building,

with CMU veneer. The gym and covered play area is structural CMU on spread footings.

Interior Walls Interior walls are wood studs with gypsum board. There is vinyl wall covering

and cedar tackboards in the classrooms; ceramic tile in the bathrooms; and veneer plaster in the corridors.

Roof The roof structure in the gym is glu-lam trusses with dimensional lumber and

plywood. The roof of the other buildings are wood trusses at 24-inches o.c. and plywood. All roofs have composition shingles.

HVAC The existing mechanical system consists of packaged air to air heat pumps,

with a separate heat pump for each classroom, the Administration area and the Gymnasium/Cafeteria. Air distribution is through ceiling diffusers.

Plumbing Water piping is copper. Storm, waste and vent piping is cast iron. Fixtures in

toilet rooms, classrooms, and janitor areas are white vitreous china or enameled cast iron. Fixtures appear to meet ADA requirements.

Fire Sprinklers The stage is the only portion of the facility that is sprinklered. Electrical The electrical service consists of 120, 277/480V distribution system for

lighting and power. Step down transformation from 480V to 120/208V for convenience outlets and small motors is provided.

Security A security system is located in all circulation areas and is tied into an outside

monitoring agency. Lighting Lighting is fluorescent except high pressure sodium for exterior lighting.

1 05 BCSR CLE.doc

Intercom/Communications An integrated intercom/telephone system is provided. Clocks A master clock and clock system is provided throughout. Fire Alarm An addressable fire alarm system is provided throughout with off site

monitoring. Asbestos containing Materials The building is reported to have no asbestos containing materials. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. The Chain Lake Elementary site is situated outside the Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary. Snohomish

County prohibits the extension of sewer service outside of the designated UGA. Until the UGA is extended to include this site, or the County adopts an exception to this policy, the District can not extend sewer service to the site and must continue bi-weekly pumping of the existing septic holding tank.

2. Add sprinkler irrigation to playfields – requires booster pump 3. Improve soft play area drainage 4. Play structure improvements 5. Install sump pumps in utility vaults 6. Improve safety and efficiency of auto and bus circulation Building: 1. Install ventilation in Workroom for laminator 2. Office Building structural inspection and potential repair 3. Gym ceiling tile repair/replacement 4. Replace carpet 5. New roofing. 6. Painting of entire facility 7. Selected window replacement 8. Replacement of Kitchen equipment and electrical upgrades 9. Replace all original wallcovering

INSTRUCTIONAL ADEQUACY July 2007

District: Monroe School District #103 School: Chain Lake Elementary County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. HVAC needs to be upgraded/modernized to provide constant temperatures in classrooms.

CHAIN LAKE ELEMENTARYAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1990 14,959 SFA1 54.00 x 150.00 = 8,100.00 s.f. + 1 8,100A2 22.00 x 54.00 = 1,188.00 s.f. + 1 1,188A3 70.00 x 50.00 = 3,500.00 s.f. + 0.5 1,750A4 12.00 x 70.00 = 840.00 s.f. + 1 840A5 48.00 x 42.00 = 2,016.00 s.f. + 1 2,016A6 3.00 x 7.00 = 21.00 s.f. + 1 21A7 15.50 x 10.00 = 155.00 s.f. + 1 155A8 3.50 x 7.00 = 24.50 s.f. + 1 25A9 24.00 x 36.00 = 864.00 s.f. + 1 864

Building B 1990 10,416 SFB1 36.00 x 94.00 = 3,384.00 s.f. + 1 3,384B2 48.00 x 76.00 = 3,648.00 s.f. + 1 3,648B3 36.00 x 94.00 = 3,384.00 s.f. + 1 3,384

Building C 1990 10,416 SFC1 36.00 x 94.00 = 3,384.00 s.f. + 1 3,384C2 48.00 x 76.00 = 3,648.00 s.f. + 1 3,648C3 36.00 x 94.00 = 3,384.00 s.f. + 1 3,384

Building D 1990 10,416 SFD1 36.00 x 94.00 = 3,384.00 s.f. + 1 3,384D2 48.00 x 76.00 = 3,648.00 s.f. + 1 3,648D3 36.00 x 94.00 = 3,384.00 s.f. + 1 3,384

TOTAL ALL BUILDINGS 46,207 SF

Building Condition Summary Report School: Frank Wagner Elementary School East Address: 639 W. Main Street City: Monroe, WA 98272-2199 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-794-3017

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 27060100407000 Approximate Acreage: 5.27 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Monroe Police Department Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Fire Department Unincorporated: Incorporated: x Zoning: PS

Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 27,500 S.F. Original Construction: 1938 Annex Addition: 1955 Partial Renovation: 1980 Roofing: 1988 HVAC Upgrade: 2001

School Capacity: Current Enrollment: (Oct. 1, 2007) 314.0 FTE 340.0 Head Count As determined by educational program and number of classrooms.




1 11 BCSR FWE.doc

Construction History: Frank Wagner Elementary School East is a single story facility originally built in 1938. In 1955 a detached classroom annex was constructed to create four additional classrooms. Then in 1980, the locker rooms were remodeled for use as the cafeteria, a new library and classroom was added, and various minor upgrades were made to the facility. The entire facility was re-roofed in 1988. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a level site near downtown Monroe shared by Frank Wagner Elementary School West and a maintenance building. Shared play fields are grass and play areas are asphalt. An asphalt parking area for this school is located between it and Frank Wagner Elementary and is shared with the maintenance building. Landscaping is minimal and not conducive to children. The site contains approximately 50 parking spaces which are shared with the district maintenance facility. The school shares it’s facility with the community auditorium. Originally constructed as a part of the school, it has since been delegated a community theater and no longer a part of the school districts educational inventory. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The structure varies within the building area but generally consists of single-

story construction on concrete spread footings, wood stud walls with brick veneer. The facility has large windows at the classroom areas and exterior exposed wood trim, typical of a building of this age.

Interior Walls Interior walls are typically wood studs with painted plaster or gypsum board

finish. Roof The roof is a composite of low slope built up and mansard shingles with

gutters and downspouts. The roof structure of the original building is composed of wood ceiling joists and sloped rafters. The annex consists of wood decking on steel trusses.

HVAC The school is heated by gas fired boilers. Air handler units and coils are used

for the classroom heating devices. Individual unit heaters serve a few classrooms. The library has its own individual heat pump, ductwork and ceiling diffusers. The Annex has exhaust fans in the corridor. The Boiler Room floor drains appear to be inadequate to handle drain water. The gym ventilation system is very poor as it utilizes passive ventilation.

Plumbing The plumbing fixtures are in poor condition. The piping is old and in poor

condition. Several plumbing and handicap code deficiencies were noted. Fire Sprinklers This facility is not sprinkled. Energy Controls The boilers are controlled by time clocks and thermostats in the rooms

operate the valves for the radiators. Electrical The electrical service was replaced in 1980 and a new pad mounted

transformer placed in the front of the school. Much of the existing wiring was replaced.

Security None

1 11 BCSR FWE.doc

1 11 BCSR FWE.doc

Lighting The lighting is fluorescent. Intercom/Communications Bogen intercom system with handsets in each room. Clocks Original 1938 mechanical master clock system is still being used. Fire Alarm Fire alarm system was upgraded to a new addressable system with battery

back-up, pull stations, horns, strobes, etc. for the entire building. Asbestos containing Materials The building contains both friable and non-friable asbestos containing materials. These include pipe insulation, sprayed on acoustical materials, and cement asbestos board. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Parking space is inadequate. 2. Vehicular traffic and bus circulation is inadequate. 3. Annex building is sited directly adjacent to an alley with no setback. This is a safety concern. 4. Asphalt drives and parking lot needs resurfacing. 5. Concrete walkways need replacement. Building: 1. Replace exterior deteriorating and rotten wood columns. 2. Replace failing gutters and downspouts. 3. Repair spalling plaster walls and ceilings. 4. Replace corridor wood panel doors and relite glazing to conform to current codes. 5. Upgrades needed to comply with current energy codes. (sawdust insulation in ceilings) 6. Replace failing windows. 7. Replace deteriorated wood casework and provide additional casework to meet programmatic needs. 8. Paint entire interior and exterior of facility. 9. Replace deteriorated restroom finishes. 10. Upgrade plumbing fixtures and accessible routes to comply with handicap codes. 11. Abate asbestos containing materials. 12. Demolish tall unreinforced masonry chimney. 13. Seismic retrofit of entire facility is needed. 14. Replace plumbing lines and fixtures. 15. Upgrade and expand electrical convenience outlets. 16. Upgrade technology wiring to district standards. 17. Replace incandescent light fixtures with fluorescent fixtures. 18. Clock, intercom, emergency lighting and security systems need replacement. 19. Add fire sprinklers to the building – currently only the stage is sprinklered.


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Frank Wagner Elementary East County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. The cafeteria is a converted locker room and does not meet programmatic needs. 2. There is inadequate storage throughout the facility. 3. Covered play area is needed. 4. Gym does not meet programmatic needs. 5. Administrative office area is small, inefficient and not contiguous. Location is inadequate for surveillance. 6. Acoustics in classroom is poor. 7. The busses drop student off on Main Street in front of the building which is a safety issue. 8. Inadequate electrical distribution throughout the facility. 9. There are no specialty type classrooms. 10. Classroom casework is minimal. 11. Chalkboards need to be replaced with whiteboards. 12. Lighting levels in instructional areas is inadequate. 13. Acoustical wall treatment is needed for wall and ceiling in the gym. 14. Consider adding a prep kitchen.

1 12 IA-FWE.doc

FRANK WAGNER ELEMENTARY EASTAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1938 19,774 SFA1 207.42 x 61.58 = 12,772.72 s.f. + 1 12,773A2 7.00 x 37.46 = 262.22 s.f. + 1 262A3 13.75 x 3.00 = -41.25 s.f. - 1 -41A4 10.63 x 16.50 = 175.31 s.f. + 1 175A5 34.21 x 60.08 = 2,055.35 s.f. + 1 2,055A6 3.00 x 22.08 = 66.25 s.f. + 1 66A7 73.5 x 57.75 = 4,244.63 s.f. + 1 4,245A8 4.58 x 57.75 = 264.69 s.f. + 1 265A9 1.50 x 7.00 = 10.50 s.f. + 1 11A10 10.50 x 3.50 = -36.75 s.f. - 1 -37

Building A1 1954 4,975 SFA11 66.50 x 70.83 = 4,710.39 s.f. + 1 4,710A12 30.33 x 10.75 = 326.05 s.f. + 1 326A13 10.17 x 3.00 = -30.50 s.f. - 1 -31A14 10.17 x 3.00 = -30.50 s.f. - 1 -31

Building A2 1980 2,751 SFA15 27.00 x 37.58 = 1,014.75 s.f. + 1 1,015A16 4.08 x 16.83 = 68.73 s.f. + 1 69A17 20.33 x 52.50 = 1,067.33 s.f. + 1 1,067A18 16.83 x 8.42 = 141.65 s.f. + 1 142A19 18.83 x 16.83 = 316.91 s.f. + 1 317A20 16.83 x 8.42 = 141.62 s.f. + 1 142


Building Condition Summary Report School: Frank Wagner Elementary School West Address: 115 Dickinson Rd. City: Monroe, WA 98272-2104 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-794-3015

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 00504300000403 Approximate Acreage: 10.21 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Monroe Police Department Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Police Department Unincorporated: Incorporated: x Zoning: PS Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 46,418 S.F. Original Construction: 1990

School Capacity: Current Enrollment: (Oct. 1, 2007) 381.0 FTE 414.0 Head Count As determined by educational program and number of classrooms:


*Grades K-4 average classroom loading at 24 students per classroom (K at .5) *Grade 5 average classroom loading at 28 students per station (includes music & PE) *Special Education – Only Life Skills students (severely disabled or medically fragile) are assigned to a classroom. All other students are assigned to a regular classroom.

1 16 BCSR FWW.doc

Construction History: Frank Wagner Elementary was constructed in 1990 and is composed of three single story buildings and one two story classroom building connected by exterior covered walks. It has had no significant upgrades, additions or modernizations. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a level site near downtown Monroe shared by Monroe Elementary School and a district maintenance building. Shared play fields are grass and play areas are asphalt except for bark in the play equipment area. The combined use of this site by both elementary schools separated by the District Maintenance Facility is less than optimal. Parking and driveway areas are asphalt with concrete curbs. There are 81 on-site parking spaces. The site is partially fenced. Landscaping is minimal. Walkways are concrete. The kitchen serves Frank Wagner Elementary and Monroe Elementary School. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The structure is composed of structural masonry, wood framing and masonry

veneer and precast concrete plank. Exterior walls are brick masonry. Windows are aluminum fixed or casement windows with double-glazing.

Interior Walls The interior partitions are wood frame with gypsum wallboard. There is a

combination of vinyl wallcovering, cedar tackboards and brick throughout and ceramic tile in the bathrooms. The corridors of the classroom building are finished with veneer plaster.

Roof The roof structure in the gym is glu-lam beams wrapped with gypsum board.

The roof of the other buildings are wood trusses at 24-inches o.c. with plywood sheathing. All roofs are medium slope with composition shingles. Roof flashing is sheet metal on painted cedar trim. Soffits are gypsum board and downspouts are painted PVC.


with a separate heat pump for each classroom, the Administration area and the Gymnasium/Cafeteria. Air distribution is through ceiling diffusers.

Plumbing Water piping is copper. Storm, waste and vent piping is cast iron. Fixtures in

toilet rooms, classrooms, and janitor areas are white vitreous china or enameled cast iron. Fixtures appear to meet ADA requirements.

Fire Sprinklers The stage is the only portion of the facility that is sprinklered. Electrical The electrical service consists of 120, 277/480V distribution system for


Security A security system is located in all circulation areas and is tied into an outside

monitoring agency. Lighting Lighting is fluorescent except high pressure sodium for exterior lighting.

1 16 BCSR FWW.doc

1 16 BCSR FWW.doc

Intercom/Communications An integrated intercom/telephone system is provided. Clocks A master clock and clock system is provided throughout. Fire Alarm An addressable fire alarm system is provided throughout with off site

monitoring. Asbestos containing Materials The building is reported to have no asbestos containing materials. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Paving additions 2. Improve soft play area 3. Playfield Improvements 4. Remove older portables 5. Remove trees that are causing pavement damage 6. Improve safety and efficiency of auto and bus circulation Building: 1. Painting of entire facility 2. Replace carpet 3. New roofing 4. Vent stack replacement for Kitchen hot water heater 5. Replacement of Kitchen equipment and electrical upgrades


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Frank Wagner Elementary West County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. Campus-style configuration creates many unsupervised areas. 2. Several of the classrooms are too small. 3. Storage is inadequate throughout the building. 4. Renovation is needed to the special services area to conform to program requirements. 5. HVAC system does not maintain constant air temperatures throughout the facility. 6. Arrangement of administration office is not very efficient.

1 17 IA-FWW.doc

FRANK WAGNER ELEMENTARY WESTAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1988 3,664 SFA1 54.00 x 56.00 = 3,024.00 s.f. + 1 3,024A2 3.33 x 5.00 = 16.65 s.f. - 1 -17A3 14.00 x 37.33 = 522.62 s.f. + 1 523A4 7.00 x 14.00 = 98.00 s.f. + 1 98A5 9.00 x 4.00 = 36.00 s.f. + 1 36

Building B 1988 2,800 SFB1 56.00 x 50.00 = 2,800.00 s.f. + 1 2,800

Building C 1988 10,304 SFC1 44.67 x 32.00 = 1,429.44 s.f. + 1 1,429C2 7.33 x 2.33 = 17.08 s.f. - 1 -17C3 16.00 x 66.00 = 1,056.00 s.f. + 1 1,056C4 78.00 x 54.00 = 4,212.00 s.f. + 1 4,212C5 52.00 x 12.00 = 624.00 s.f. + 1 624C6 20.00 x 64.00 = 1,280.00 s.f. + 1 1,280C7 8.75 x 3.50 = 30.63 s.f. - 1 -31C8 50.00 x 70.00 = 3,500.00 s.f. + 0.5 1,750

Building D 1988 18,821 SFD1 298.00 x 70.00 = 20,860.00 s.f. + 1 20,860D2 30.33 x 8 (2) = 485.28 s.f. - 1 -485D3 21.00 x 8 (2) = 336.00 s.f. - 1 -336D4 26.00 x 12 (2) = 624.00 s.f. - 1 -624D5 10.00 x 29.67 (2) = 593.40 s.f. - 1 -593

Building E 1988 10,829 SFE1 172.00 x 70.00 = 12,040.00 s.f. + 1 12,040E2 10.00 x 29.33 (2) = 586.60 s.f. - 1 -587E3 26.00 x 12 (2) = 624.00 s.f. - 1 -624


Building Condition Summary Report School: Fryelands Elementary School Address: 15286 Fryelands Boulevard City: Monroe, WA 98272 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-863-4770

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 00831900099800 Approximate Acreage: 7.09 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Monroe Police Department Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Fire Department Unincorporated: Incorporated: X Zoning: PS

Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 54,074 S.F. Original Construction: 2005



*Grades K-4 average classroom loading at 24 students per classroom (K at .5) *Grade 5 average classroom loading at 28 students per station (includes music & PE) *Special Education – Only Life Skills students (severely disabled or medically fragile) are assigned to a classroom. All other students are assigned to a regular classroom.

1 21 BCSR FRE.doc

Construction History: The school was completed in 2005 with funding secured by a 2003 bond issue. The facility is a two-story building designed to house K-5 grades and zoned to accommodate after hour and community use by centrally organizing the Media Center, Administration and the Multi-purpose Room directly off the main entry. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The site is a relatively flat triangular shaped seven-acre parcel located within the City of Monroe. The site is adjoined on the North by a City Park which the District uses for playfields under an inter-local agreement. A service loop encircles the entire school. A parent drop-off zone and main parking is located at the front of the school serving the main entrance, kindergarten classrooms and the multi-purpose room. A large covered play area is provided off the back of the multi-purpose room near the bus-loading zone which students use to wait in inclement weather. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The building exterior is a masonry veneer with painted fiber cement siding

above. The building has a steel frame with metal stud walls and tube steel seismic bracing concealed within interior and exterior walls except for the Multipurpose Room, Kitchen area and Music Platform, which is comprised of reinforced concrete masonry.

Interior Walls The interior walls are typically painted gypsum board on metal studs except

for the multipurpose area which is painted masonry. A medium density fiberboard (MDF) wainscot runs around the perimeter of all heavy traffic areas. Vinyl wallcovering is provided throughout as a tackable surface.

Roof Asphalt composition shingles on plywood over vented rigid insulation on 3/4”

plywood supported on steel joists at 32” o.c. HVAC Heating and ventilation is provided to each zone in the facility by hydronic

heat pump and air handlers. Air handlers are located in isolated mechanical rooms above the second floor corridor. Primary heating is provided by gas-fired boilers located in the Boiler Room. Heating water is distributed to each unit by Schedule 40 steel piping and Type L copper piping. Piping for the heat loop is not insulated. Air conditioning is provided as part of the heat pump system. An outdoor air-cooled fluid cooler provides heat rejection. Ventilation air is tempered by an electric coil and supplied to the heat pumps by a separate fan system and relieved from each zone.

Plumbing A 3” domestic water service is provided from a new main outside the building

to a main shutoff valve located in the Boiler Room. Premium efficient condensing type gas water heaters provide hot water for toilet room facilities, and sinks. Recirculating hot water lines are provided with time and temperature controlled pumps. All above grade water and heating service is Type L copper. All below grade water piping is Type K copper. All storm waste and vent piping is cast iron. Insulation is provided on all water piping inside the building. All fixtures meet ADA requirements. Toilet room and janitorial plumbing fixtures are white vitreous china. Water closets and urinals are furnished with heavy duty manually operated flush valves with

1 21 BCSR FRE.doc

1 21 BCSR FRE.doc

water conserving flow rates. Lavatories are furnished with metering water conserving faucets.

Fire Sprinklers The building is sprinklered throughout. A 6” fire service main is provided to

the building riser in the fire sprinkler riser room. A complete wet pipe sprinkler system conforming to NFPA 13 is installed.

Energy Controls DDC temperature control system is provided incorporating energy

conservation and building occupation control stratagies. Electrical The electrical distribution is 480V/277V. Step down transformers are used to

supply branch panels at 208V/120V. Surge suppression is provided at all 120 volt panels. Each computer lab has a branch panel to facilitate future changes.

Security A complete security system is installed throughout the facility. Lighting Interior lighting systems are fluorescent with T8 lamps and electronic

ballasts. Parabolic fixtures are used in the computer areas. Lensed fixtures are used in other areas except for the Gymnasium where there are metal halide fixtures.

Intercom/Communications An integrated intercom/telephone system exists throughout the entire facility.

Fire Alarm An addressable fire alarm system meeting current code is provided. Asbestos containing Materials The building does not have any known asbestos containing materials. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. None Noted. Building: 1. None Noted.


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Fryelands Elementary School County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. Inlay gym court lines.

1 22 IA-FRE.doc

FRYELAND ELEMENTARY AREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsFIRST FLOOR 37,037 SF

1 148.67 x 58.67 = 8,722.47 s.f. + 1 8,7222 103.92 x 75.34 = 7,829.33 s.f. + 1 7,8293 103.92 x 75.34 = 7,829.33 s.f. + 1 7,8294 85.00 x 48.34 = 4,108.90 s.f. + 1 4,1095 67.34 x 46.00 = 3,097.64 s.f. + 0.5 1,5496 30.67 x 27.92 = 856.31 s.f. + 1 8567 30.67 x 27.92 = 856.31 s.f. + 1 8568 16.00 x 44.75 = 716.00 s.f. + 1 7169 16.00 x 44.75 = 716.00 s.f. + 1 716

10 15.92 x 33.34 = 530.77 s.f. + 1 53111 15.92 x 33.34 = 530.77 s.f. + 1 53112 40.67 x 8.67 = 352.61 s.f. + 1 35313 29.00 x 11.00 = 319.00 s.f. + 1 31914 29.00 x 11.00 = 319.00 s.f. + 1 31915 4.17 x 45.67 = 190.44 s.f. + 1 19016 4.17 x 45.67 = 190.44 s.f. + 1 19017 11.79 x 49.58 = 584.55 s.f. + 1 58518 11.79 x 49.58 = 584.55 s.f. + 1 58519 15.34 x 5.34 = 81.92 s.f. + 1 8220 15.34 x 5.34 = 81.92 s.f. + 1 8221 17.34 x 3.00 = 52.02 s.f. + 1 5222 17.34 x 3.00 = 52.02 s.f. + 1 5223 1.58 x 17.58 = 27.78 s.f. + 1 2824 1.58 x 17.58 = 27.78 s.f. + 1 2825 7.25 x 3.00 = 21.75 s.f. + 1 2226 7.25 x 3.00 = 21.75 s.f. + 1 2227 6.67 x 8.67 = 57.83 s.f. - 1 -5828 6.67 x 8.67 = 57.83 s.f. - 1 -58

SECOND FLOOR 17,037 SF1 76.42 x 32.50 = 2,483.65 s.f. + 1 2,4842 76.42 x 32.50 = 2,483.65 s.f. + 1 2,4843 56.50 x 32.92 = 1,859.98 s.f. + 1 1,8604 56.50 x 32.92 = 1,859.98 s.f. + 1 1,8605 84.20 x 11.83 = 996.09 s.f. + 1 996

(Continued)

FRYELAND ELEMENTARY AREA ANALYSIS

(Continued)Add/

Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor Totals6 28.50 x 32.92 = 938.22 s.f. + 1 9387 28.50 x 32.92 = 938.22 s.f. + 1 9388 28.17 x 27.34 = 770.17 s.f. + 1 7709 28.17 x 27.34 = 770.17 s.f. + 1 770

10 69.50 x 9.50 = 660.25 s.f. + 1 66011 69.50 x 9.50 = 660.25 s.f. + 1 66012 32.34 x 16.08 = 520.03 s.f. + 1 52013 34.67 x 9.75 = 338.03 s.f. + 1 33814 34.67 x 9.75 = 338.03 s.f. + 1 33815 15.34 x 7.32 = 112.29 s.f. + 1 11216 15.50 x 29.00 = 449.50 s.f. + 1 45017 15.50 x 29.00 = 449.50 s.f. + 1 45018 16.58 x 5.68 = 94.17 s.f. + 1 9419 16.58 x 5.68 = 94.17 s.f. + 1 9420 2.67 x 15.17 = 40.50 s.f. + 1 4121 2.67 x 15.17 = 40.50 s.f. + 1 4122 21.05 x 5.17 = 108.83 s.f. + 1 10923 21.05 x 5.17 = 108.83 s.f. + 1 10924 12.46 x 4.34 = 54.08 s.f. + 1 5425 12.46 x 4.34 = 54.08 s.f. + 1 5426 1.51 x 17.50 = 26.43 s.f. + 1 2627 1.51 x 17.50 = 26.43 s.f. + 1 2628 1.33 x 15.17 = 20.18 s.f. - 1 -2029 1.33 x 15.17 = 20.18 s.f. - 1 -2030 2.67 x 14.83 = 39.60 s.f. - 1 -4031 2.67 x 14.83 = 39.60 s.f. - 1 -4032 2.42 x 8.50 = 20.57 s.f. - 1 -2133 2.42 x 8.50 = 20.57 s.f. - 1 -2134 3.25 x 6.00 = 19.50 s.f. - 1 -2035 3.25 x 6.00 = 19.50 s.f. - 1 -2036 1.34 x 14.83 = 19.87 s.f. - 1 -2037 1.34 x 14.83 = 19.87 s.f. - 1 -20


Building Condition Summary Report School: Maltby Elementary School Address: 9700 212th S.E. City: Snohomish, WA 98296-7198 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-863-4130

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 27052500100300 Approximate Acreage: 9.48 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Sno. County Sheriff Fire Jurisdiction: Sno. Fire District #7 Unincorporated: x Incorporated: Zoning: R-5

Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 50,230 S.F. Original Construction: 1968 Covered Playshed: 1987 Modernization: 2005 Classroom Addition: 2005





1 26 BCSR MBE.doc

Construction History: Maltby Elementary was constructed in 1968 as a campus style facility composed of three single story buildings connected by covered walks and breezeways. A detached covered playshed was added in 1987. The building was re-roofed in 1988. A classroom building was added in 2005 including expansion of the main office along with full modernization of the existing facility. Site improvements were made to parking, bus loading area and the main courtyard. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a fairly level site in a rural neighborhood surrounded by farms, houses, and vacant lots. Play fields are grass and play areas are asphalt except bark in the soft play equipment area. Parking lots and drives are asphalt with extruded concrete curbs. There are approximately 76 on-site parking spaces. Fire hydrants and equipment access is provided. The storm drain system is on site and part of the grass play field area contains the septic tank and drainfield. The site is fenced with chain link fencing. Landscaping includes shrubs and trees in well-maintained planting areas. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The structure is composed of brick masonry bearing walls, steel columns,

glu-lam beams and wood T & G decking. Windows are aluminum. Fascias are laminated wood and soffits are exposed decking and glu-lams. Exterior walls are non-insulated giant brick.

Interior Walls The interior partitions are wood framed with gypsum wallboard. Roof The roof is low slope SBS modified built-up roofing over minimal rigid

insulation and flashings. The roof structure is 2x6 T&G decking on glu-lam beams. Downspouts are galvanized and painted.

HVAC Each classroom has a vertical fan coil unit in a closet that is equipped with

an economizer damper arrangement to allow up to 100% outside air for free cooling, when atmospheric conditions allow. During the occupied mode, the DDC system controls the automatic dampers to confirm that minimum ventilation outside air quantities are delivered to the spaces. The economizer controls allow for modulation of outside air quantities to maintain temperature in the space, as well as control the heating coil valve to allow additional heat as required by each individual space. These units also can be set up for 100% recirculation, 0% outside air for morning warm up and unoccupied mode operation. Thee units are controlled thru the DDC system, and monitored at the Monroe SD central maintenance office. The Gym air handling system utilizes the DDC system and CO2 sensors to modulate the outside air damper to the minimum position to maintain the set point CO2 levels in the space.

Plumbing The domestic hot, cold, and hot water circulation system is Type L hard

drawn copper with fiberglass insulation. All sinks, faucets, and trim in the classrooms were replaced with new equipment. Portions of the underslab soil, waste, and vent system were reused where appropriate, new piping was added where required. A new hydronic heating system was installed with boilers, base mounted circulating pumps, and connections to new fan coil units in each classroom. This hydronic heating system is controlled by the DDC system

1 26 BCSR MBE.doc

1 26 BCSR MBE.doc

Fire Sprinklers The building is sprinklered throughout. A 6” fire service main is provided to

each building for separate fire sprinkler riser rooms. A complete wet pipe sprinkler system conforming to NFPA 13 is installed.

Energy Controls DDC temperature control system is provided incorporating energy

conservation and building occupation control strategies. The DDC system is by Alerton Technologies, installed by ATS Automation, the district’s energy management system vendor

Electrical The electrical service consists of 120, 277/480V distribution system for


Lighting Lighting is fluorescent except HID fixtures in the Gym and high pressure

sodium for exterior lighting. Intercom/Communications An integrated intercom/telephone system exists throughout the entire facility. Fire Alarm An addressable fire alarm system meeting current codes is provided. Asbestos containing Materials The building was abated of all known asbestos containing material in 2005. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Septic field improvements and upgrades are needed to reduce maintenance. Building: 1. Renovate Kitchen and Kitchen Storage area. 2. New roofing is needed.


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Maltby Elementary School County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. Provide a fenced pre-school play area with new equipment.

1 27 IA-MBE.doc

MALTBY ELEMENTARYAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1974 10,512 SFA1 88.75 x 112.67 = 9,999.46 s.f. + 1 9,999A2 7.92 x 64.67 = 512.19 s.f. + 1 512

Building B 1974 18,769 SFB1 128.67 x 136.67 = 17,585.33 s.f. + 1 17,585B2 8.00 x 24.67 (6) = 1,184.16 s.f. + 1 1,184

Building C 1974/2005 14,038 SFC1 128.67 x 104.67 = 13,467.89 s.f. + 1 13,468C2 3.00 x 7.33 = 21.99 s.f. - 1 -22C3 8.00 x 24.67 (3) = 592.08 s.f. - 1 592.08

Building D 1987 1,750 SFD1 50.00 x 70.00 = 3,500.00 s.f. + 0.5 1,750

Building E 2005 5,160 SFE1 89.00 x 58.67 = 5,221.63 s.f. + 1 5,222E2 9.30 x 5.42 = 50.41 s.f. + 1 50E3 5.00 x 22.33 = 111.65 s.f. - 1 -112


Building Condition Summary Report School: Salem Woods Elementary School Address: 12802 Wagner Road City: Monroe, WA 98272-7712 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-794-3027

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 28072900300400 Approximate Acreage: 10.09 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Snohomish County Sheriff Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Fire Department Unincorporated: x Incorporated: Zoning: R-5

Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 38,338 S.F. Original Construction: 1980 Classroom Addition: 1987 Parking revisions: 1988 Roofing: 1999





1 31 BCSR SWE.doc

Construction History: Salem Woods Elementary was constructed in 1980 and is composed of five single story buildings connected by the roof system, covered walks and breezeways. A single classroom was added in 1987. Parking lot revisions occurred in 1988. Irrigation was added to two of the play field areas in 1998 and the entire facility was re-roofed and painted in 1999. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a fairly level site in a rural neighborhood. The site contains an irrigated grass play field and an irrigated baseball field. A soft surface play area divides the two play fields. Hard surface play areas are concrete. Parking lots and drives are asphalt with concrete curbs. The fire hydrants are serviced from a drafting station in the lake across the street; adequate fire flow is not available from the existing utilities provided to the site. The storm drain system is collected from the roof and dispersed into rain barrels. A small detention pond is located on site. The sewer system consists of a septic tank with two drain fields located under the play fields. The site is partially fenced with chain link fencing. Landscaping includes shrubs and trees in planting areas and planter boxes. The site contains a wooded area with a stream, which is used as an environmental instruction area. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The structure consists of single-story timber pole and steel tube column

construction on spread footings. The exterior walls are painted beveled wood siding. Plywood soffits are stain finished. Aluminum windows are single-glazed with glass and plastic.

Interior Walls The interior partitions are painted gypsum board on metal studs except for

the folding walls between classrooms. Roof The roof structure consists of glu-lam beams with sawn purlins and 1-1/8”

plywood. Roofing is composition shingles. Roof drainage is to gutters and then overflows to concrete catch basins except at the gym where downspouts are utilized.


with a separate heat pump for each classroom, the Administration area and the Gymnasium/Cafeteria. The equipment is clean and in fair condition but at the end of its useful life. Air distribution is through ceiling diffusers. The HVAC system should be investigated for conformance with current codes for air exchange.

Plumbing Plumbing consists of hot and cold piping and drain lines under slabs and in

frame walls. All classroom sinks have independent water heaters, which are undersized for regular use.

Fire Sprinklers Fire sprinklers are provided under the stage platform only. The rest of the

building is not sprinkled. A small pond is located across the street and a drafting station was constructed for additional fire flow capacity to the building in case of an emergency.

Energy Controls The facility contains the original pneumatic energy control system.

1 31 BCSR SWE.doc

1 31 BCSR SWE.doc

Electrical The electrical service consists of 120, 277/480V distribution system for lighting and power. Step down transformation from 480V to 120/208V for convenience outlets and small motors is provided.

Security A security system is located in the office area and library which, is tied into

an outside monitoring agency. Lighting Lighting is fluorescent except HID fixtures in the Gym and high pressure

sodium for parking lot lighting and incandescent for walkway security lighting. Intercom/Communications An integrated intercom/telephone system is provided. Clocks A master clock and clock system is provided throughout. Fire Alarm The building maintains the original non-addressable fire alarm system. Asbestos containing Materials The building is not reported to contain any friable asbestos containing materials but does have asbestos tile mastic. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Improve roof and storm drainage system to meet current codes. 2. Improve the southern play field. 3. Repair deteriorating asphalt surfaces 4. Replace 4-foot high perimeter fencing with 6-foot high fencing 5. Replace exterior security and walkway lighting. 6. Parking capacity is inadequate. Building: 1. Repair cracking and rotted areas of timber pole columns and covered play area beams. 2. Replace gutters and provide downspouts & drainage improvements. 3. Replace flooring throughout the facility. 4. New wall finishes in restrooms. 5. Add ventilation to Health Room 6. Replacement of worn equipment in Multi-Purpose Room. 7. Investigate HVAC system for conformance with current air exchange codes. 8. Replace/upgrade HVAC control system. 9. Remove undersized water heaters and replace with central units. 10. Replace plumbing fixtures. 11. Upgrade fire alarm system. 12. Upgrade technology system to current district standards. 13. Clock system is not fully operational and should be upgraded. 14. Repaint entire facility


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Salem Woods Elementary County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. Covered Play Area needs to be enlarged and more surface play areas added. 2. Exterior circulation causes heating and circulation problems 3. There is inadequate storage for student items in the classrooms. 4. There is insufficient custodial storage. 5. Stage curtain and lighting does not meet programmatic needs. 6. Student restrooms open into unsupervised open hallways. 7. Classroom casework is inefficient. 8. There is inadequate storage around entire facility. 9. Inadequate electrical service. 10. Parking lot design encourages unsafe parent drop-off of students. 11. Staff Room is undersized. 12. With the campus plan arrangement it is difficult to control, or be notified, of visitors.

1 32 IA-SWE.doc

SALEM WOODS ELEMENTARYAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1980 9,943 SFA1 70.67 x 120.33 = 8,503.72 s.f. + 1 8,504A2 62.25 x 46.25 = 2,879.06 s.f. + 0.5 1,440

Building B 1980 6,231 SFB1 45.25 x 64.50 = 2,918.63 s.f. + 1 2,919B2 44.50 x 12.50 = 556.25 s.f. + 1 556B3 52.50 x 52.50 = 2,756.25 s.f. + 1 2,756

Building C 1980 6,625 SFC1 64.50 x 90.50 = 5,837.25 s.f. + 1 5,837C2 15.00 x 52.50 = 787.50 s.f. + 1 788

Building D 1980 8,528 SFD1 64.50 x 120.00 = 7,740.00 s.f. + 1 7,740D2 15.00 x 52.50 = 787.50 s.f. + 1 788

Building E 1980 5,956 SFE1 15.00 x 52.50 = 787.50 s.f. + 1 788E2 64.00 x 64.50 = 4,128.00 s.f. + 1 4,128E3 32.00 x 32.50 = 1,040.00 s.f. + 1 1,040

Building E1 1987 1,056 SFE4 32.50 x 32.50 = 1,056.25 s.f. + 1 1,056


Building Condition Summary Report School: Hidden River Middle School Address: 9224 Paradise Lake Road City: Snohomish, WA 98296-7145 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-863-4100

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 27052500102400 Approximate Acreage: 25.2 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Snohomish County Sheriff Fire Jurisdiction: Snohomish County Fire District #7 Unincorporated: x Incorporated: Zoning: IP Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 60,688 S.F Original Construction: 1999 Covered Playshed: 2002 Gym/Music Addition: 2005


Grades 6-8 SE Sub Total 83% Portables Totals

CR S CR S CR S 100% 90% 19 532 1 0 532 442 0 0 532 442

*Grades 6-8 average classroom loading at 28 students per station (includes music & PE) * Calculated at 83% room utilization. *Special Education – Only Life Skills students (severely disabled or medically fragile) are assigned to a classroom. All other students are


February 08 1 36 BCSR HRMS.doc

Construction History: Hidden River Middle School was constructed in 1999 as the first phase of a planned two-phase facility. Initially constructed to house 400 students, the school is planned for an eventual expansion to 800 students with specialty classrooms and labs. A covered playshed was added in 2002. A gymnasium, music and choir room addition was added in 2005 Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a large 25 acre rural site. The fields are natural grass consisting of a play field and ball field. The play fields are not irrigated or under-drained. A location for a future track and field has been identified and may be accommodated on site in the future. Parking can accommodate 144 cars and eight busses with a future planned addition for up to another 61parking spaces. Handicap parking, loading/unloading areas and handicap access features are provided and are sufficient for current use. On-site biofiltration swales and a detention pond accommodate storm drainage. Sewer is tied into a mainline that services the highway 522 corridor. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The structure is a two-story wood framed building with CMU veneer and fiber

cement exterior siding. Interior Walls Interior walls are typically wood studs with gypsum board finish. The

corridors are finished with veneer plaster, the bathrooms with ceramic tile and the kitchen with FRP panels. Some of the classroom walls have vinyl wallcovering.

Roof The roofing is 25-year composition shingles on plywood sheathing on pre-

manufactured wood trusses. HVAC Heating and ventilation is provided to each zone in the facility by hydronic

heat pump air handlers. Air handlers are located in the attic with easy access for safe access for maintenance and repair. A constant volume air handler with gas furnace sections serves the Multipurpose Room. Primary heating is provided by gas fired boilers located in the Boiler Room. Air conditioning is provided as part of the heat pump system. An outdoor air-cooled fluid cooler provides heat rejection.

Plumbing A 6” domestic water service is provided from a main outside the building to a

main shutoff valve located in the Boiler Room. A 6” fire service main is provided to the building to a header in the Boiler Room.

Standard efficiency gas fired water heaters provide hot water for toilet room facilities, sinks and labs. Re-circulating hot water lines with time and temperature controlled pumps provide quick hot water delivery at all fixtures.

Fixtures in toilet rooms, water coolers and in classrooms meet current ADA requirements. Water closets and urinals are furnished with heavy duty automatic operated flush valves with water conserving flow rates. Lavatories are furnished with metering, water conserving faucets.



Fire Sprinklers A complete wet pipe sprinkler system is installed. Dry side wall heads

protect the exterior canopy areas. Energy Controls Direct digital control is provided for all HVAC systems, exterior lighting and

landscape sprinklers. Electrical 208Y/120V. Surge suppression is provided at the main distribution panel and

all 120-volt panels. Security A security system is installed throughout the facility and is in working order. Lighting Interior lighting systems are fluorescent with T8 lamps and electronic

ballasts. Exterior lighting is HPS with photocell and EMS control. Exit and emergency lights are provided in the corridors, media center,

multipurpose room and other areas as required by code. Intercom/Communications A master clock system is provided and fully operational. An integrated intercom/telephone system is provided and fully operational. The Data Network System is provided. System meets the District middle

school standards. TV distribution system with local origination is provided. Fire Alarm An addressable fire alarm system meeting current jurisdiction requirements

is provided. Asbestos containing Materials The building does not have any asbestos containing materials. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Cooling tower fencing. 2. Add irrigation sprinklers to fields Building: 1. Kitchen expansion needed.


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Hidden River Middle School County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. The building satisfies all the educational objectives for which it was built within the constraints of it being a

starter school for the area.

1 37 IA-HRMS.doc

HIDDEN RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOLAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1999 46,391 SFA1 112.50 x 32.67 = 3,675.38 s.f. + 1 3,675A2 98.58 x 30.67 = 3,023.55 s.f. + 1 3,024A3 84.50 x 11.33 = 957.39 s.f. + 1 957A4 37.25 x 70.42 = 2,623.15 s.f. + 1 2,623A5 51.33 x 113.00 = 5,800.29 s.f. + 1 5,800A6 42.67 x 8.42 = 359.28 s.f. + 1 359A7 16.5 x 62.67 = 1,034.06 s.f. + 1 1,034A8 8.92 x 31.42 = 280.16 s.f. + 1 280A9 74.67 x 76.42 = 5,706.03 s.f. + 1 5,706A10 46.00 x 7.75 = 356.50 s.f. + 1 357A11 31.42 x 59.33 = 1,864.15 s.f. + 1 1,864A12 18.67 x 2.42 = 45.18 s.f. + 1 45A13 30.25 x 9.33 = 282.23 s.f. + 1 282A14 7.75 x 13.33 = 103.31 s.f. + 1 103A15 23.66 x 85.75 = 2,028.85 s.f. + 1 2,029A16 7.83 x 17.08 = 133.74 s.f. + 1 134A17 13.92 x 27.10 = 377.23 s.f. + 1 377A18 31.25 x 78.00 = 2,437.50 s.f. + 1 2,438A19 9.33 x 10.33 = 96.38 s.f. + 1 96A20 7.33 x 46.00 = 337.18 s.f. + 1 337A21 99.58 x 13.91 = 1,385.16 s.f. + 1 1,385A22 114.00 x 87.00 = 9,918.00 s.f. + 1 9,918A23 82.00 x 31.50 = 2,583.00 s.f. + 1 2,583A24 46.00 x 6.25 = 287.50 s.f. + 1 288A25 10.50 x 64.50 = 677.25 s.f. + 1 677A26 NA x NA = 18.48 s.f. + 1 18

Building B 1999 13,073 SFB1 84.50 x 74.67 = 6,309.62 s.f. + 1 6,310B2 32.67 x 28.00 = 914.76 s.f. + 1 915B3 9.67 x 13.67 = 132.19 s.f. + 1 132B4 20.58 x 13.67 = -281.37 s.f. - 1 -281B5 70.00 x 37.67 = 2,636.90 s.f. + 1 2,637B6 12.50 x 13.83 = -172.88 s.f. - 1 -173B7 10.00 x 6.67 = -66.70 s.f. - 1 -67B8 41.75 x 42.50 = 1,774.38 s.f. + 1 1,774B9 6.00 x 7.83 = -47.00 s.f. - 1 -47B10 12.33 x 32.17 = 396.62 s.f. + 1 397B11 3.25 x 6.50 = 21.13 s.f. + 1 21

B12 27.00 x 24.00 = 648.00 s.f. + 1 648B13 4.42 x 18.75 = 82.81 s.f. + 1 83B14 25.42 x 28.50 = 724.38 s.f. + 1 724

Building C 2002 1,224 SFC1 40.13 x 61.00 = 2,447.93 s.f. + 0.5 1,224


Building Condition Summary Report School: Monroe Middle School Address: 351 Short Columbia City: Monroe, WA 98272-1802 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-794-3020

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 27060100102300 27060100402600 Approximate Acreage: 5.28 Acres (15 acres of fields across street) Police Jurisdiction: Monroe Police Department Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Fire Department Unincorporated: Incorporated: x Zoning: PS Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 84,997 S.F. Vocational Building: 1954/1981 Science Building: 1964/1967

Classroom/PE/Admin: 1967 Aux. Gym/Cafeteria: 1980 Roofing: 1989 Admin. Addition: 1990 School Capacity: Current Enrollment: (Oct. 1, 2007) 496.4 FTE 498.0 Head Count As determined by educational program and number of classrooms.


CR S CR S CR S 100% 90% 28 784 5 5 789 655 2 56 845 701

*Grades 6-8 average classroom loading at 28 students per station (includes music & PE) * Calculated at 83% room utilization. *Special Education – Only Life Skills students (severely disabled or medically fragile) are assigned to a classroom. All other students are


1 41 BCSR MMS.doc

Construction History: Monroe Middle School was built as a replacement for the original Monroe High School, which was torn down at this site after a 1965 earthquake. The school was rebuilt at the original site and utilizes buildings that were part of the original school. The oldest building on the site is the Vocational Building originally constructed in 1954. An addition to this building was added in 1981. The Science Building was constructed in 1964. Two additions were added to the Science Building in 1967. The main Classroom and Library Building was constructed in 1967 along with the Physical Education Building and Administration Building. An Auxiliary Gym and Lunchroom addition was added to the PE Building in 1980. The entire facility was re-roofed in 1989. An addition to the Administration Building was added in 1990. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a level site near downtown Monroe and is across the street from the Auxiliary Athletic Facilities, which it shares for PE fields. The facility is composed of five buildings connected by covered walks. There is very little space left for additions to the campus. There is a blacktop area on site. Lawn areas and landscaping is minimal. Parking areas are asphalt with concrete curbs. Walkways are concrete. The storm system is tied into the City’s system but some of the storm water is reported to infiltrate back into the ground through french drains. The sewer is connected to the City system. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls Exterior walls are typically uninsulated brick masonry with some metal siding

at the shop building. Fascias are painted wood and galvanized copings except for beveled wood siding at the gym. Exterior windows are single glazed steel and aluminum.

Interior Walls The interior walls are primarily a combination of reinforced masonry,

reinforced concrete, reinforced brick and wood studs. Finishes include painted and integral colored masonry, plaster, and sheetrock.

Roof Roofs are low slope SBS roofing. Roof drainage is to drains and gutters and

then to downspouts. HVAC The heating system is mostly electric with unit ventilators in each classroom;

heating and ventilating units in the gymnasium, cafeteria, and shops; and wall heaters in the administration area. The shops have exhaust systems for sawdust collection, welding and the foundry. Electronic air filters are installed to remove fine dust from the shop air. None of the existing HVAC equipment is in compliance with current codes.

Plumbing The domestic water piping system is galvanized steel, typically installed

under slab on grade. The water is rusty indicating corrosion of the galvanized pipes. Many of the china plumbing fixtures are cracked or broken. All of the flush valves are manual flush. The domestic water heaters are of various ages.

Fire Sprinklers The facility is not protected by a fire sprinkler system. Many of the existing

buildings have combustible overhangs that exceed four feet which will require a dry sprinkler system.

Energy Controls The existing system is a “piece meal” collection of various manufacturers’

pneumatic controls. All of the controls have exceeded their anticipated useful life. There is no energy management system in use at this site.

1 41 BCSR MMS.doc

1 41 BCSR MMS.doc

Electrical The electrical distribution is 480V/277. Step down transformers are used to supply branch panels at 208V/120V.

Security Motion detectors and door contacts are in place at the General Office,

Computer Rooms, Shop, Library and one classroom which used to be a computer lab.

Lighting There is a variety of fixtures of all different ages throughout. Intercom/Communications Clock/speaker system was replaced in 1990. Fire Alarm Two independent fire alarm systems exist within the facility. Both are

antiquated and should be replaced. Asbestos containing Materials The building contains friable asbestos containing materials such as pipe insulation and non-friable vinyl asbestos tile. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Repair deteriorating covered walkways. 2. Improve storm drainage so parking lot does not flood. 3. Improve site lighting. 4. Event parking is inadequate. 5. Play area is inadequate. Fields across the street is a safety issue and cannot be used for recess. 6. Repair existing deteriorated walkways and add new to improve site circulation. 7. Facility does not have a covered play area. Building: 1. Gym walls need to be sealed. Showing effervescence. 2. Install curbs in shower area to contain water. 3. Provide screening to control visibility into shower room. 4. Expand the size of the kitchen to accommodate programmatic needs. 5. Renovate cafeteria. 6. Replace windows and add insulation to bring buildings up to current energy code compliance. 7. Replace deteriorated flooring. 8. Paint entire facility – inside and out. 9. Perform a seismic evaluation for conformance to current codes. 10. Replace deteriorated plumbing system with copper piping. 11. Improve/replace heating and ventilation system throughout facility. 12. Upgrade the shop exhaust systems. 13. Upgrade and expand the electrical and data systems. 14. Replace fire alarm system to comply with current codes. 15. Extend data system to all classrooms. 16. Upgrade/replace lighting system to increase lighting levels. 17. Replace fluorescent lighting in gym with HID fixtures for safety and efficiency. 18. Plumbing upgrades 19. Modernize classrooms 20. Upgrade restrooms 21. Remove masonry smokestack 22. Add exhaust fan in Library for Laminator 23. Add smoke detectors and fire alarm system throughout facility.


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Monroe Middle School County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. The library needs to be redesigned to meet current programmatic needs. 2. Acoustics need to be improved in the small gym. 3. Play fields and play field access is not adequate. A covered play area is needed and more surfaced play

areas and playground equipment are needed to accommodate current student population. 4. Building needs to be made more accessible, especially the toilet rooms. 5. The teacher’s workroom needs to be enlarged or another one built. 6. The classrooms are generally too small for the 7th and 8th grades. (School originally designed as an open

concept high school) 7. More conference and itinerant spaces are needed around the campus. 8. Shower rooms need to be remodeled and upgraded. 9. There is not adequate storage. 10. There is a shortage of electrical outlets in the classrooms. 11. Corridors with lockers on each side are too narrow for safety and adequate use. 12. A custodial supply room occupies the central part of the open library and should be relocated. 13. The classrooms are in a “pod-system” and do not meet current programmatic needs. 14. Band Room acoustics is poor. 15. Band Room does not have ADA accessibility. 16. Physical reconfiguration of instructional spaces is needed throughout the campus to deliver current

programs.

1 42 IA-MMS.doc

MONROE MIDDLE SCHOOLAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1954 7,008 SFA1 78.00 x 97.84 = 7,631.52 s.f. + 1 7,632A2 4.00 x 14.00 = 56.00 s.f. + 1 56A6 10.00 x 44.00 = -440.00 s.f. - 1 -440A7 10.00 x 24.00 = -240.00 s.f. - 1 -240

Building A1 1967 4,174 SFA3 34.00 x 17.50 = 595.00 s.f. + 1 595A4 34.00 x 6.50 = 221.00 s.f. + 1 221A5 78.00 x 34.33 = 2,677.74 s.f. + 1 2,678A6 10.00 x 44.00 = 440.00 s.f. + 1 440A7 10.00 x 24.00 = 240.00 s.f. + 1 240

Building B 1967 24,192 SFB1 144.00 x 168.00 = 24,192.00 s.f. + 1 24,192

Building B1 1980 9,485 SFB2 36.50 x 35.75 = 1,304.88 s.f. + 1 1,305B3 7.50 x 31.75 = 238.13 s.f. + 1 238B4 12.67 x 35.75 = 452.95 s.f. + 1 453B5 12.67 x 36.58 = 463.47 s.f. + 1 463B6 80.33 x 85.00 = 6,828.05 s.f. + 1 6,828B7 4.00 x 49.33 = 197.32 s.f. + 1 197

Building C 1967 2,640 SFC1 36.00 x 73.33 = 2,639.88 s.f. + 1 2,640

Building C1 1990 1,197 SFC2 16.33 x 73.33 = 1,197.48 s.f. + 1 1,197

Building D 1954 10,560 SFD1 80.00 x 132.00 = 10,560.00 s.f. + 1 10,560

Building E 1967 25,741 SFE1 27.50 x 13.75 = 378.13 s.f. + 1 378E2 39.00 x 27.50 = 1,072.50 s.f. + 1 1,073

(CONTINUED)

MONROE MIDDLE SCHOOLAREA ANALYSIS

(CONTINUED)

E3 27.50 x 13.75 = 378.13 s.f. + 1 378E4 27.50 x 39.00 = 1,072.50 s.f. + 1 1,073E5 39.00 x 39.00 = 1,521.00 s.f. + 1 1,521E6 27.50 x 39.00 = 1,072.50 s.f. + 1 1,073E7 27.50 x 13.75 = 378.13 s.f. + 1 378E8 39.00 x 27.50 = 1,072.50 s.f. + 1 1,073E9 33.50 x 33.50 = 1,122.25 s.f. + 1 1,122E9A 6.00 x 3.00 = 18.00 s.f. - 1 -18E9B 8.00 x 3.50 = 28.00 s.f. - 1 -28E10 39.00 x 33.50 = 1,306.50 s.f. + 1 1,307E11 33.50 x 33.50 = 1,122.25 s.f. + 1 1,122E11A 6.00 x 3.00 = 18.00 s.f. - 1 -18E11B 8.00 x 3.50 = 28.00 s.f. - 1 -28E12 39.00 x 27.50 = 1,072.50 s.f. + 1 1,073E13 29.00 x 13.75 = 398.75 s.f. + 1 399E14 238.33 x 19.50 = 4,647.44 s.f. + 1 4,647E15 29.00 x 19.50 = 565.50 s.f. + 1 566E16 39.00 x 19.50 = 760.50 s.f. + 1 761E17 27.50 x 19.50 = 536.25 s.f. + 1 536E18 27.50 x 19.50 = 536.25 s.f. + 1 536E19 39.00 x 19.50 = 760.50 s.f. + 1 761E20 29.00 x 19.50 = 565.50 s.f. + 1 566E21 37.00 x 37.00 = 1,369.00 s.f. + 1 1,369E21A 3.50 x 4.00 = 14.00 s.f. - 1 -14E21B 9.50 x 4.75 = 45.13 s.f. - 1 -45E21C 8.00 x 1.75 = 14.00 s.f. - 1 -14E22 39.00 x 27.50 = 1,072.50 s.f. + 1 1,073E23 27.50 x 13.75 = 378.13 s.f. + 1 378E24 27.50 x 13.75 = 378.13 s.f. + 1 378E25 39.00 x 27.50 = 1,072.50 s.f. + 1 1,073E26 37.00 x 37.00 = 1,369.00 s.f. + 1 1,369E26A 3.50 x 4.00 = 14.00 s.f. - 1 -14E26B 9.5 x 4.75 = 45.13 s.f. - 1 -45E26C 8 x 1.75 = 14.00 s.f. - 1 -14


Building Condition Summary Report School: Park Place Middle School Address: 1408 West Main Street City: Monroe, WA 98272-2099 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-794-3010

Site Information

Tax Parcel No.: 27060100306500 27060200409400 Approximate Acreage: 19.4 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Monroe Police Department Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Fire Department Unincorporated: Incorporated: x Zoning: PS Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 109,912 S.F. Original Construction: 1974 Additions: 1980 Library Building: 1990 Roofing 1997/1998

Art & Tech 1999 School Capacity: Current Enrollment: (Oct 1, 2007) 576.6 FTE 577 Head Count As determined by educational program and number of classrooms.


CR S CR S CR S 100% 90% 40 1120 3 6 1126 935 5 140 1266 1051

*Grades 6-8 average classroom loading at 28 students per station (includes music & PE). * Calculated at 83% room utilization. *Special Education – Only Life Skills students (severely disabled or medically fragile) are assigned to a classroom. All other students are


1 46 BCSR PPM.doc

Construction History: Park Place Middle School was originally constructed in 1974 as the high school for the District. It was converted to a junior high in 1999 after the completion of a new high school for the District. In 2005 the District moved the 9th grade up to the High School and renamed this facility from Monroe Junior High to Park Place Middle School. The campus consists of six independent buildings connected by covered walks. Three additions were added in 1980. Another addition and the Library building were added in 1990. Five of the buildings were re-roofed in 1997 and 1998. An Art & Technology Program remodel was performed in 1999 Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: The school is located on a level site on Main Street near downtown Monroe. A grass playfield is located in the back of the site for PE use. Parking and driveway areas are asphalt with extruded asphalt and concrete curbs. Walkways are concrete. Additional pedestrian areas include a paved area near the front entry and asphalt strips between the buildings. Landscaping is minimal with lawn in front and along the perimeter buildings, some large trees, and a small landscaped area near the Library. The campus is mostly open with a minimal amount of chain link fencing. Parking is sufficient but the paving and curbing is deteriorating in many locations. Drainage improvements are needed as many of the drain lines are frequently plugged. Due to slight elevation gains around the site, there are many areas that do not conform to handicap accessible regulations. The middle school has extensive field space for physical education. The back portion of the site is not fenced and is accessible to the dike by the river. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls Exterior walls are brick masonry, with small single glazed aluminum sash

windows and painted hollow metal doors and frames. Interior Walls Interior walls consist of gyp-board on wood framing as well as exposed

masonry which is predominately around the exterior. Most of the interior finishes shows excessive wear due to the high use in the past.

Roof The roofs are low slope SBS roofing. Flashings and downspouts are painted

galvanized steel and sheet metal. Covered walks are metal decking. Fascias are painted wood boards and soffits are exposed T&G decking.

HVAC The school is heated with natural gas and most buildings have roof-mounted

multi-zone heating and ventilating units which are Nesbitt in the older sections and Mammoth in the newer additions. Most of the rooftop units appear to be beyond their anticipated useful life and should be replaced. The Locker Rooms are heated with gas unit heaters. Underground gas piping has leaked in the past and has been found to be pitted.

Plumbing Plumbing consists of hot & cold water copper piping under slabs and

galvanized hot and cold water piping above grade. There are insufficient gate valves for the water piping system, and the City main must be shut down to service the water system within the school.

Fire Sprinklers Only the stage is sprinkled.

1 46 BCSR PPM.doc

1 46 BCSR PPM.doc

Energy Controls Most of the campus is served by pneumatic controls. The central air compressor is located in the mechanical room of Building A. Building F is the newest of the buildings and has an outdated Alerton 3500 series control system.

Electrical The main electrical service is a 1200A, 277/480V, 3 phase, 4 wire

switchboard. A Snohomish PUD three phase transformer is located west of Building A. The 1400 amp service is badly underpowered.

Security Security system consists of (2) Silent Knight 4720 Security Panels and (2)

4120 Zone Expander panels supporting door contacts and wall mount PIR motion detectors.

Lighting Fluorescent fixtures are used for classrooms, office, and corridor lighting.

The Main Gym contains tandem wired industrial strip fluorescent fixtures. Commons area lighting is surface wrap and mono-point incandescent lights.

Intercom/Communications The intercom head-end is located in a storage room inside the men’s

restroom in main office and consists of a Bogen wall mount cabinet. The Lathem Master Clock in the office is not functioning.

Fire Alarm Fire alarm system is Notifier System 5000 with a Kirkland annunciator panel.

Facility does not have complete smoke detector coverage. Asbestos containing Materials The building is not reported to have friable asbestos containing materials but does have vinyl asbestos tile. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Patch and repair deteriorated parking lot asphalt paving. 2. Accommodate handicap accessibility throughout the campus. 3. Improve exterior lighting. 4. Patch and repair asphalt and concrete walkways and curbs. 5. Repair downspouts and improve the storm drainage system. 6. Add fencing and security cameras. 7. Replace underground gas piping. Building: 1. Upgrade electrical and data distribution throughout the facility. 2. Replace old rooftop HVAC units and controls. 3. Install additional gate valves on the main water line and the lines to each building. 4. Glu-lam beams are rotting at exposed exterior ends. 5. Improve ventilation in labs. 6. Replace Gym fluorescent lighting with HID lighting for safety and efficiency. 7. Replace Gym ceiling 8. Replace gym bleachers 9. Remove lockers 10. Replace Library security gate. 11. Gas service needs to be replaced. 12. A large underground 2500 gallon LPG tank needs to be decommissioned.


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Park Place Middle School County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. Security of campus should be reviewed. The campus is too accessible from surrounding public areas. 2. Science Labs need remodeling to meet current program requirements. 3. Need additional office and tutoring spaces. 4. Need classroom space which is conducive to OT/PT and SLP programs. 5. Cafeteria and gym space is too small for the current student population. 6. Divider curtain in Gymnasium is in need of replacement. 7. Provide hot water to physical science room. 8. Dedicated space is needed for District-wide MDF.

1 47 IA-PPM.doc

PARK PLACE MIDDLE SCHOOLAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A 1974 28,993 SFA1 157.00 x 184.67 = 28,993.19 s.f. + 1 28,993

Building A1 1990 3,197 SFA2 67.67 x 36.67 = 2,481.46 s.f. + 1 2,481A3 15.00 x 31.67 = 475.05 s.f. + 1 475A4 15.00 x 16.00 = 240.00 s.f. + 1 240

Building B 1974 13,229 SFB1 48.67 x 62.75 = 3,054.04 s.f. + 1 3,054B2 96.67 x 105.25 = 10,174.52 s.f. + 1 10,175

Building B1 1980 2,989 SFB3 58.00 x 52.00 = 3,016.00 s.f. + 1 3,016B4 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13B5 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13

Building C 1974 10,360 SFC1 72.67 x 44.67 = 3,246.17 s.f. + 1 3,246C2 64.67 x 110.00 = 7,113.70 + 1 7,114

Building C1 1980 6,414 SFC3 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13C4 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13C5 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13C6 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13C7 64.67 x 100.00 = 6,467.00 s.f. + 1 6,467

Building D 1974 10,056 SFD1 56.00 x 64.33 = 3,602.48 s.f. + 1 3,602D2 80.00 x 80.67 = 6,453.60 s.f. + 1 6,454

Building D1 1980 4,330 SFD3 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13D4 4.00 x 3.33 = 13.32 s.f. - 1 -13

54.00 x 80.67 = 4,356.18 s.f. + 1 4,356(CONTINUED)

PARK PLACE MIDDLE SCHOOLAREA ANALYSIS

(CONTINUED)

Building D2 1990 457 SFD6 28.00 x 16.33 = 457.24 s.f. + 1 457

Building E 1974 9,265 SFE1 32.67 x 112.67 = 3,680.93 s.f. + 1 3,681E2 11.33 x 80.67 = 913.99 s.f. + 1 914E3 52.67 x 88.67 = 4,670.25 s.f. + 1 4,670

Building F 1990 20,622 SFF1 90.67 x 32.00 = 2,901.44 s.f. + 1 2,901F2 109.33 x 45.33 = 4,955.93 s.f. + 1 4,956F3 30.67 x 32.00 = 981.44 s.f. + 1 981F4 29.33 x 24.00 = 703.92 s.f. + 1 704F5 30.67 x 32.00 = 981.44 s.f. + 1 981F6 64.00 x 16.00 = 1,024.00 s.f. + 1 1,024F7 90.67 x 16.00 = 1,450.72 s.f. + 1 1,451F8 109.33 x 45.33 = 4,955.93 s.f. + 1 4,956F9 30.67 x 32.00 = 981.44 s.f. + 1 981F10 29.33 x 24.00 = 703.92 s.f. + 1 704F11 30.67 x 32.00 = 981.44 s.f. + 1 981


Building Condition Summary Report School: Monroe High School Address: 17001 Tester Road City: Monroe, WA 98272-2819 County: Snohomish Telephone: 360-863-4000

Site Information Tax Parcel No.: 27061100201100 Approximate Acreage: 33 Acres Police Jurisdiction: Monroe Police Department Fire Jurisdiction: Monroe Fire Department Unincorporated: x Incorporated: Zoning: PS Building Information: Current Sq. Footage: 209,432 S.F. Original Construction: 1999 Classroom Addition 2005 Stadium 2005

School Capacity: Current Enrollment: (Oct. 1, 2007) 1725.3 FTE 1761.0 Head Count

As determined by educational program and number of classrooms.

Grades 9-12 SE Sub Total 90% Portables Totals CR S CR S CR S 100% 90% 68 1820 6 5 1909 1718 8 224 2133 1920

* Grades 9-12 average classroom loading at 28 students per station (includes music & PE) * Calculated at 90% room utilization. * Special Education – Only Life Skills students (severely disabled or medically fragile) are assigned to a classroom. All other student

are assigned to a regular classroom. * Based on rotating schedule of classrooms.

1 51 BCSR MHS.doc

Construction History: The High School was constructed in 1999. The facility was designed to allow for an additional classroom wing to be added in the future. This wing and the final build out of parking were constructed in 2005. Also in 2005 the original grass football field was replaced with synthetic turf and a partially covered grandstand, concession building with restrooms, and a ticket booth was constructed. Surrounding Site Description and Utilization: Site improvements include two entry drives, parking for 742 cars, bus loading and a parent drop-off zone. A service drive circles the building with gates at either end to limit the traffic to service and fire department vehicles. Bus loading is at the north end of the school. Athletic improvements include a synthetic football/soccer field with running track, one natural grass baseball field, two grass softball fields, and eight tennis courts. A 200 seat covered grandstand and press booth is located to the north of the football/soccer field and a 500 seat visitors bleacher is located to the south. All storm water from the building roof and parking lots are retained in two separate filtration and detention ponds before leaving the site to maintain the current flow rate off the site. Water from the larger west pond flows directly to an existing culvert under Tester Road. Brief Building Component Description: Exterior Walls The building exterior is a masonry veneer with brick accents up to the

second floor and then stucco above. The building has a steel frame with metal stud walls except for the gym, which is comprised of reinforced masonry.

Interior Walls The interior walls are typically painted gypsum board on metal studs except

for the gym and locker room areas, which are reinforced masonry. A medium density fiberboard (MDF) wainscot runs around the perimeter of all heavy traffic areas.

Roof Metal panel roofing at a 3/12 pitch over a 1 ½” deep composite steel deck

spanning to open web steel K-joists. HVAC Heating and ventilation is provided to each zone in the facility by hydronic

heat pump air handlers. Air handlers are located in isolated mechanical rooms above the second floor classroom pods and in general attic spaces. Air conditioning is provided as part of the heat pump system. Primary heat is provided by gas fired boilers located in the Boiler Room.

Administration areas are conditioned by fan powered VAV boxes installed

above the ceiling in each room served. Plumbing Domestic water piping is all copper. Toilet room and janitorial plumbing

fixtures are white vitreous china. Water closets and urinals are furnished with heavy duty manually operated flush valves with water conserving flow rates.

Fire Sprinklers The building is sprinklered throughout. Energy Controls DDC temperature control systems are provided.

1 51 BCSR MHS.doc

1 51 BCSR MHS.doc

Electrical The electrical distribution is 480V/277V. Step down transformers are used to

supply branch panels at 208V/120V. Surge suppression is provided at all 120 volt panels. Each computer lab has a branch panel to facilitate future changes.

Security A complete security system is installed throughout the facility. Lighting Interior lighting systems are fluorescent with T8 lamps and electronic

ballasts. Parabolic fixtures are used in the computer areas. Lensed fixtures are used in other areas except for the Gymnasium where there are T-5 fixtures.

Intercom/Communications An integrated intercom/telephone system exists throughout the entire facility.

Fire Alarm An addressable fire alarm system meeting current code is provided. Asbestos containing Materials The building does not have any known asbestos containing materials. Facility/Site Deficiencies Site: 1. Conversion of the practice fields into competition fields to centrally locate High School sports. 2. Stadium/Field lighting modifications. 3. Drainage improvements needed at football field. 4. Resurfacing of the existing track is needed. Building: 1. Additional exhaust in Science Prep Rooms.


District: Monroe School District #103 School: Monroe High School County: Snohomish Evaluators: Ralph Yingling

Kevin Oremus

In the area below, indicate any features of the building which are identified as impeding the instructional programs or contributing to a less than suitable educational environment. 1. Convert photo darkroom into TV Production Lab 2. Sound system upgrades to PAC 3. Acoustical upgrades to PAC 4. Acoustical upgrades to Gym 5. Limited outdoor playfield area. 6. Field House needed to accommodate wrestling program.

1 52 IA-MHS.doc

MONROE HIGH SCHOOLAREA ANALYSIS

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsBuilding A1 1999 136,182 SFA1 222.33 x 117.66 = 26,159.35 s.f. + 1 26,159A2 94.66 x 10.33 = 977.84 s.f. + 1 978A3 84.66 x 31.33 = 2,652.40 s.f. + 1 2,652A4 34.00 x 10 = 340.00 s.f. + 1 340A5 95.66 x 105.33 = 10,075.87 s.f. + 1 10,076A6 86.66 x 28 = 2,426.48 s.f. + 1 2,426A7 42.66 x 11.33 = 483.34 s.f. + 1 483A8 83.66 x 19.66 = 1,644.76 s.f. + 1 1,645A9 NA x NA = 334.00 s.f. + 1 334A10 18.66 x 4 = 74.64 s.f. - 1 -75A11 NA x NA = 334.00 s.f. + 1 334A12 NA x NA = 727.50 s.f. + 1 728A13 NA x NA = 4,053.60 s.f. + 1 4,054A14 NA x NA = 4,053.60 s.f. + 1 4,054A15 NA x NA = 1,154.80 s.f. + 1 1,155A16 NA x NA = 1,154.80 s.f. + 1 1,155A17 54.75 x 34 = 1,861.50 s.f. + 1 1,862A18 81.00 x 81.33 = 6,587.73 s.f. + 1 6,588A19 NOT USEDA20 98.00 x 105.33 = 10,322.34 s.f. + 1 10,322A21 86.66 x 28 = 2,426.48 s.f. + 1 2,426A22 42.66 x 11.33 = 483.34 s.f. + 1 483A23 22.50 x 6.33 = 142.43 s.f. + 1 142A24 193.00 x 103.5 = 19,975.50 s.f. + 1 19,976A25 19.33 x 11.83 = 228.67 s.f. + 1 229A26 32.66 x 11.83 = 386.37 s.f. + 1 386A27 71.33 x 44 = 3,138.52 s.f. + 1 3,139A28 35.33 x 10 = 353.30 s.f. + 1 353A29 42.66 x 11.33 = 483.34 s.f. + 1 483A30 86.66 x 28 = 2,426.48 s.f. + 1 2,426A31 105.33 x 85.33 = 8,987.81 s.f. + 1 8,988A32 97.00 x 12.66 = 1,228.02 s.f. + 1 1,228A33 97.00 x 6.75 = 654.75 s.f. + 1 655A34 105.33 x 42.66 = 4,493.38 s.f. + 1 4,493A35 76.00 x 38 = 2,888.00 s.f. + 1 2,888A36 NOT USEDA37 NA x NA = -48.00 s.f. + 1 -48A38 NOT USEDA39 NA x NA = -48.00 s.f. + 1 -48A40 NA x NA = 1,207.00 s.f. + 1 1,207A41 31.33 x 112.5 = 3,524.63 s.f. + 1 3,525A42 41.83 x 92.66 = 3,875.97 s.f. + 1 3,876A43 31.33 x 6.08 = 190.49 s.f. + 1 190A44 22.16 x 30.5 = 675.88 s.f. + 1 676

(Continued)


(Continued)

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsA45 10.83 x 10.25 = 111.01 s.f. + 1 111A46 41.83 x 10.25 = 428.76 s.f. + 1 429A47 11.50 x 17.16 = 197.34 s.f. + 1 197A48 3.33 x 12.08 = 40.23 s.f. + 1 40A49 16.83 x 18.08 = 304.29 s.f. + 1 304A50 6.45 x 12.91 = 83.27 s.f. + 1 83A51 15.33 x 15.42 = 236.39 s.f. + 1 236A52 26.83 x 0.66 = 17.71 s.f. - 1 -18A53 31.33 x 47.91 = 1,501.02 s.f. + 1 1,501A54 12.66 x 28 = 354.48 s.f. + 1 354

Building B1 1999 73,352 SFB1 96.00 x 12.33 = 1,183.68 s.f. + 1 1,184B2 44.00 x 29.00 = 1,276.00 s.f. + 1 1,276B3 62.58 x 5.08 = 317.91 s.f. + 1 318B4 104.83 x 96.33 = 10,098.27 s.f. + 1 10,098B5 12.66 x 9.58 = 121.28 s.f. + 1 121B6 73.50 x 28.00 = 2,058.00 s.f. + 1 2,058B7 42.16 x 11.33 = 477.67 s.f. + 1 478B8 NA x NA = 223.37 s.f. + 1 223B9 4.08 x 20.91 = 85.38 s.f. + 1 85B10 10.16 x 11.58 = 117.65 s.f. - 1 -118B11 28.50 x 6.75 = 192.38 s.f. - 1 -192B12 92.83 x 38.75 = 3,597.16 s.f. + 1 3,597B13 NA x NA = 1,974.96 s.f. + 1 1,975B14 NA x NA = 1,974.96 s.f. + 1 1,975B15 27.66 x 20.16 = 557.63 s.f. - 1 -558B16 NA x NA = 224.95 s.f. - 1 -225B17 NA x NA = 224.95 s.f. - 1 -225B18 82.00 x 41.00 = 3,362.00 s.f. + 1 3,362B19 9.16 x 10.50 = 96.18 s.f. - 1 -96B20 9.16 x 7.00 = 64.12 s.f. - 1 -64B21 104.83 x 83.75 = 8,779.51 s.f. + 1 8,780B22 9.75 x 12.66 = 123.44 s.f. + 1 123B23 73.50 x 28.00 = 2,058.00 s.f. + 1 2,058B24 42.16 x 11.33 = 477.67 s.f. + 1 478B25 NA x NA = 223.37 s.f. + 1 223B26 10.16 x 11.58 = 117.65 s.f. - 1 -118B27 28.50 x 6.75 = 192.38 s.f. - 1 -192B28 170.66 x 14.00 = 2,389.24 s.f. + 1 2,389B29 16.25 x 4.25 = 69.06 s.f. + 1 69B30 10.75 x 4.25 = 45.69 s.f. + 1 46

(Continued)


(Continued)

Add/Area Length Width Area Subtr. Factor TotalsB31 27.16 x 19.66 = 533.97 s.f. + 1 534B32 15.33 x 8.08 = 123.87 s.f. + 1 124B33 102.16 x 66.50 = 6,793.64 s.f. + 1 6,794B34 19.58 x 7.16 = 140.19 s.f. + 1 140B35 12.08 x 17.50 = 211.40 s.f. + 1 211B36 8.08 x 58.5 = 472.68 s.f. + 1 473B37 9.75 x 12.66 = 123.44 s.f. + 1 123B38 84.83 x 104.83 = 8,892.73 s.f. + 1 8,893B39 73.50 x 28.00 = 2,058.00 s.f. + 1 2,058B40 NA x NA = 223.37 s.f. + 1 223B41 42.16 x 11.33 = 477.67 s.f. + 1 478B42 10.16 x 11.58 = 117.65 s.f. - 1 -118B43 28.50 x 6.75 = 192.38 s.f. - 1 -192B44 NA x NA = 1,895.74 s.f. + 1 1,896B45 NA x NA = 67.00 s.f. + 1 67B46 NA x NA = 69.70 s.f. + 1 70B47 31.33 x 84.00 = 2,631.72 s.f. + 1 2,632B48 NA x NA = 80.34 s.f. + 1 80B49 41.33 x 4.91 = 202.93 s.f. + 1 203B50 41.83 x 124.00 = 5,186.92 s.f. + 1 5,187B51 31.33 x 112.50 = 3,524.63 s.f. + 1 3,525B52 28.33 x 6.83 = 193.49 s.f. - 1 -193B53 9.33 x 12.16 = 113.45 s.f. - 1 -124B54 26.83 x 0.66 = 17.71 s.f. - 1 -18B55 10.83 x 10.66 = 115.45 s.f. + 1 156B56 30.33 x 10.66 = 323.32 s.f. + 1 323B57 15.00 x 27.42 = 411.30 s.f. + 1 411B58 12.08 x 15.42 = 186.27 s.f. + 1 185B59 6.45 x 12.91 = 83.27 s.f. + 1 83

73,352

TOTAL BUILDING AREA 209,534 SF

CHAPTER II

WAC 392-341-025 (2) A long-range educational and facilities plan setting forth the projected facility needs and priorities of the district based on the educational plan.


2. LONG RANGE EDUCATIONAL AND FACILITIES PLAN Overview of the Monroe School District

Monroe School District is uniquely located in the southeastern portion of Snohomish County and covers approximately 82 square miles. The Skykomish and Snoqualmie Rivers join to form the Snohomish River in the center of the District. The topography includes flood plains to rolling hills. The major east-west road is U.S. Highway 2, leading from Everett to Stevens Pass and Eastern Washington. The major link to Bothell, Seattle, and the east side of the County is SR-522, leading from Monroe to Woodinville. SR-203 is a major traffic link between Monroe, Duvall, Carnation and the Redmond/Bellevue areas. The District currently serves a student population of 7,174 (October 1, 2007) with six elementary schools, three middle schools, and one high school. “Leaders in Learning”, an individualized secondary program, is also offered in a facility owned by the District but not located in an existing school. Sky Valley Education Center, an individualized program for students in grades K-12 who otherwise would be home schooled, is housed in leased facilities. Summit School is a cooperative program with Snohomish and Sultan School Districts to offer a highly specialized program for students in grades 7-12 and is also housed in leased facilities. Sky Valley Education Center, Summit School and Leaders in Learning student enrollment figures are included in both the District and OSPI figures. Elementary schools provide educational programs for students in kindergarten through grade five. Middle schools serve grades six through eight and the high school, grades nine through twelve. Leaders in Learning serve grades nine through twelve. The District also provides fiscal and administrative support for the Youth Re-Engagement program housed off-site at Everett Community College in Everett Washington. Re-Engagement program enrollment figures are not included in either District or OSPI figures. Significant Issues Related to Facility Planning in the Monroe School District

Student Growth - A significant issue faces the Monroe School District in terms of providing classroom capacity to accommodate projected enrollment demands due to the rate of student growth, and the availability and affordability of suitable school sites for development of new facilities. Enrollment projections for the District indicate continued growth. Accommodating this growth within the District’s adopted educational program will require expansion of existing facilities, construction of new facilities on acquired sites, and temporary housing of students in portables until such time as permanent facilities can be provided. Enrollment Projection Summary Enrollment in the Monroe School District has been increasing steadily since the 1980’s. This trend is partially due to an increase in births in the 1980’s and 1990’s as the children of baby boomers entered the schools. It is also due to continued housing and population growth in Snohomish County (see the detailed demographic data and population projections included in Chapter 3 of this report). In summary, the medium range enrollment projection for Monroe School District is expected to increase from today’s enrollment of 7,174 to 7,500 students in 2010 and to more than 9,100 students by 2020. More growth is expected at the elementary grade band than at the middle school and high school level through 2010. The long range forecast suggests that the District could see an additional 1,000 elementary students, approximately 500 middle school students, and over 600 high school students by 2020. Educational Facility and Program Standards School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational

2 01 Long Range Plan.doc 1


program offerings, classroom utilization and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classroom facilities (portables). Monroe School District grade level configurations were modified in September 2005 to meet student needs by converting the Junior High into a Middle School, thereby reducing student load at the elementary and middle school levels. The District’s educational program standards which directly affect school capacity are outlined below for the elementary, middle, and high school levels. Educational Program Standards for Elementary Schools

" Class size for grades K-4 should not exceed 24 students. Class size for grade 5 should not exceed 28 students.

" Special Education for students will be provided in a self-contained classroom or in a separate classroom.

" All students will be provided music instruction in a separate classroom. " All students will have scheduled time in a computer lab. " Optimum design capacity for new elementary schools is 500-700 students.

Educational Program Standards for Middle and High Schools

" Class size for middle school grades should not exceed 28 students. " Class size for high school grades should not exceed 28 students. " As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for

certain programs, and the need for teachers to have work space during planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day.

" Special Education for students will be provided in a self-contained classroom. " Identified students will also be provided other nontraditional educational opportunities in

classrooms designated as follows: Resource Rooms (i.e. computer labs, study rooms); Special Education Classrooms; and Program Specific Classrooms (i.e. music, drama, art, science, family and consumer science, physical education, technology education).

" Desired design capacity for new middle schools is 750 students. However, actual capacity of individual schools may vary depending on the educational programs offered and/or geographic area served.

" Desired design capacity for new high schools is 1,600-1,800 students. However, actual capacity of individual schools may vary depending on the educational programs offered.

Relocatable Classroom Facilities (Portables) Portables are used as interim classroom space to house students until construction of permanent classroom facilities takes place. The Monroe School District currently uses 30 portables at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim capacity. These portables will continue to be used and moved from site to site in order to meet instructional needs and temporarily house students as necessary until permanent facilities are constructed or service areas are adjusted. Land Inventory The Monroe School District owns an undeveloped parcel of 14 acres adjacent to Chain Lake Elementary. The District could build a middle school on this site to serve the growing northern end of the District but the presence of a large wetland in the southwest corner and associated buffers will make this challenging. It is believed that a 2-story middle school will fit in the southeast corner of the site but there will be little to no room left for development of playfields conducive to a middle school program. The site is outside the urban growth boundary and therefore does not have sewer service. A new school will have to include a sewage holding tank and be pumped regularly as is currently done for Chain Lake Elementary. The District is in the process of pursuing a property purchase of 14 acres along the Old Owen Road corridor. The property is expected to be used for a new elementary school.



It is anticipated the District will still need additional elementary schools in the area north of Highway 2. The necessary sites should be purchased in the near future while developable property suited to school sites is still available. Renovation/Replacement of Existing Facilities – A number of Monroe School District’s facilities have surpassed their useful life and are in need of a major renovation or replacement. Building systems are failing at a rate that surpasses routine maintenance and the physical structures at several sites are deteriorating at an accelerated rate. In addition to the infrastructure needs, District programs are challenged to keep current with educational needs due to lack of classroom and support resources. The three District school facilities requiring the most significant attention are as follows: Monroe Middle School Park Place Middle School Frank Wagner Elementary School East Additional District facilities are in need of minor improvements to correct life safety issues, implement code upgrades, and provide parity across grade bands at selected school sites. Funding should be allocated as part of a District-wide improvement plan for miscellaneous small projects to correct deficiencies at all sites. District support facilities such as the Central Administration Building and the Maintenance Offices are in need of significant renovations but have not been listed as a higher priority than the schools mentioned above. In the near future the District will need to address funding of support services as their current facilities continue to grow more outdated and require more maintenance New Facilities and Additions – Additional elementary classroom capacity is needed. Immediate capacity can be accommodated by classroom additions to existing schools. The following three campuses have been identified as having expansion potential: Salem Woods Elementary School – 4 classroom addition Chain Lake Elementary School – 4 classroom addition Frank Wagner Elementary School Campus – 12 classroom addition To accommodate the long range growth forecast which predicts that the District will see an additional 1,000 elementary school students by 2020, two new elementary school sites should be purchased as soon as possible and planning for development of the sites started in the near future. Facility Planning Committee

In anticipation of a school construction bond in 2008, the District convened a series of facility work groups to review facility needs and study different aspects of a future bond issue. The process involved district personnel, school staff, parents, and community members. Volunteers were divided up into selected committees and groups as follows:

Oversight Committee – approximately 12 members, meeting once a month to discuss the nature of education, review big picture perspectives on schools, make recommendations as to what school facilities will need to meet District program requirements in the future, and to oversee the bond development planning and process. School and Site Review Groups – unlimited membership to identify needs at specific school sites, organized by “school of attendance”. Synthesis and Analysis Group – 10 to 15 members to review data specific to grade bands and begin prioritization of school needs.



Facility Oversight Review Committee – approximately 12 members to review comments and suggestions for feasibility and cost effectiveness.

Summary of Facility Work Group Recommendations After three months of meetings, tours and workshops, the facility work groups presented the following summary of information to the Facility Professionals Review Group: High School – Top 5 Suggested Projects

" Purchase existing Sky Valley Education Center facility to add “Leaders in Learning” to additional space provided

" Increase MHS Library square footage " Upgrade MHS Performing Arts Center " Upgrade baseball/softball fields at MHS to competition fields " Add new soft-floor field house on MHS site

Middle Schools – Top 5 Suggested Projects

" Modernize Monroe Middle School " Improve student safety by improving traffic patterns & campus access, student activity

seating " Improve “comfort” systems – ADA accessibility, restrooms, kitchens & heating/ventilation " Increase student access to technology at all schools " Install/improve outdoor play areas to be equitable between schools

Elementary Schools – Top 5 Suggested Projects for Safety

" Chain Lake – gym drainage & tile; office building structural inspection & potential repair " Salem Woods – parking & traffic flow; gym floor " Monroe – office visibility to entrance; parking lot " Fryelands – portico run-off " Frank Wagner – portable classrooms; drainage; trees/parking lot

Elementary Schools – Top 5 Suggested Projects for Improved Learning

" Improve heating/ventilation at Salem Woods, Fryelands, Monroe, Frank Wagner and Chain Lake

" Enclose halls at Salem Woods " Add library, technology center & classrooms in a new building to be shared by Frank Wagner

& Monroe; use Monroe library as new main office; demolish annex classrooms " Revamp Fryelands storage areas to add classrooms

Elementary Schools – Top 5 Suggested Projects for Core Facilities

" New roof at Chain Lake " Monroe kitchen and lunchroom revamp " Maltby storage for PE equipment " Maltby kitchen revamp " Chain Lake playground remodel

Elementary Schools – Top 5 Suggested Projects for Infrastructure

" Covered play area added at Monroe " New carpet at Frank Wagner and Chain Lake " New gutters at Salem Woods " Classroom technology to be increased at all schools " Chain Lake playground drainage improved



Facility Oversight Review Committee The Facility Oversight Review Committee examined and discussed the Work Group recommendations. To assist the committee in refinement and prioritization of needs into a fiscally responsive long-term facility use plan, the following goals were established to frame future decisions:

1. Use current available school sites for future expansion or new schools, (e.g. combine Frank Wagner Elementary and Monroe Elementary into one site utilizing available “underutilized” property between the sites for development of “Core-facilities” to be used by both schools, development of the Chain Lake Middle School Site to accommodate middle school growth at the north end of the District, Classroom additions to Chain Lake Elementary and Salem Woods Elementary, and development of a new elementary school facility at the Old Owen property).

2. Evaluate current facilities to identify modifications needed to adequately serve the grade bands

assigned to the school.

3. Attempt to maintain the current grade configuration if possible. Determine a consistent configuration for the longest possible duration.

4. Recognize the uniqueness of the respective grades and programs served at each site.

5. Develop a long-term plan that would be the most fiscally responsible to the local taxpayer.

Long-Term Strategic Facility Plan

Based on the Facility Committee’s established goals, examination of population projections, and the recommendations of the Facility Work Group, the following items have been determined to be significant facility needs. Implementation of a plan to address these items is necessary to restore the condition of the existing buildings, upgrade/expand instructional space to meet current program requirements, and accommodate growth in student enrollment. A. Optimize Current Facilities and Land

1. Determine if the Chain Lake Site or another District owned site can be used for a future middle school.

2. Add four classrooms at Chain Lake Elementary. 3. Add four classrooms at Salem Woods Elementary. (Student capacity restricted due to septic holding

tank) 4. Renovation of Park Place Middle School to serve program requirements and replace failing systems. 5. New core facility serving Frank Wagner Elementary and Monroe Elementary. Demolish the Monroe

Elementary classroom annex and provide a new core facility building between the schools consisting of a library, technology center, and up to twelve classrooms.

6. Transition out of the existing Monroe Middle School and determine best use for facility/site. Should this facility be replaced on its current site or relocated to a different site?

7. Determine future of the Central School Site and if it should continue to be used as the District Office. 8. Hidden River Middle School site can be expanded to accommodate 800+ students if needed.

(Enrollment projected through 2012 does not indicate a need for expansion within this service area). B. Future Sites

1. Purchase the Old Owen site for development of future elementary school. 2. Purchase the leased facility for the Sky Valley Education Center.




3. Locate and purchase a site for a satellite transportation facility. 4. Find and purchase a future elementary site north of Highway 2.

C. Program Considerations

1. Ensure full state / local funding for low class size ratios. 2. Relocate “Leaders in Learning” to a space that is conducive to education – possibly co-locate with

Sky Valley Education Center. 3. Improve softball and baseball fields at the high school to consolidate competition fields. 4. Implement technology upgrades and expansion throughout all school facilities.

D. Immediate Needs

1. Bond Issue is needed to fund improvements. 2. Middle School program and facility upgrades are needed at existing middle schools. 3. Additional elementary school capacity is needed. 4. Site safety and access upgrades are needed at older schools. 5. HVAC upgrades, new roofing, and ADA improvements are required at selected sites.

Committee Recommendations

The above items will be presented to the Monroe School District Board of Directors for further review and discussion. These are immediate needs and as many of these items as possible should be addressed in the next Bond campaign. Any items that are not included on the upcoming Bond Issue should be re-evaluated and considered on a following Bond Issue within the next 4-6 years. Strategic Plan Cost Estimate Summary See attached spreadsheet

Monroe School District

Estimated Project Costs for 2009 Bond10/31/2007

2007 2007 2007 2009Student Square Square Footage Building Other Required Escalation Escalation Projected Bid Opening

Project Type Size Footage Construction Construction Project Costs Percentage Years Project Year Yearor Purchase or Purchase 30% 8% Amount

Cost Cost

1) Monroe MS Replacement (146 sf/student) 750 109,500 $265 $29,017,500 $37,722,750 30.91% 3.5 $49,382,852 2010 2012

2) Four classroom addition at CLE 104 5,200 $265 $1,378,000 $1,791,400 16.64% 2 $2,089,489 2009 2009

3) Four classroom addition at SWE 104 5,200 $265 $1,378,000 $1,791,400 16.64% 2 $2,089,489 2009 2009

4) Modernize Park Place Middle School - 109,912 $211 $23,191,432 $30,148,862 36.05% 4 $41,017,526 2011 2013

5) FWE Core Facilities & Classroom Addition - 25,000 $265 $6,625,000 $8,612,500 16.64% 2 $10,045,620 2011 2012

6) District School System Upgrades - Varies Varies $10,000,000 $13,000,000 16.64% 2 $15,163,200 2009 2012

7) Building Purchases - - - $4,000,000 - 16.64% 2 $4,665,600 - 2011

8) District Technology Upgrades - Varies Varies $3,000,000 $3,900,000 16.64% 2 $4,548,960 2009 2011

9) Transportation Facility - - - $6,000,000 $7,800,000 25.97% 3 $9,825,660 2010 2012

10) Land Purchases - - - $4,000,000 - 16.64% 2 $4,665,600 - -

11) Old Owen Site Improvements - - - $1,000,000 $1,300,000 8.00% 1 $1,404,000 2010 -

12) ADA, Demolition, Kitchem Imp., Bus Loading Areas

- - Varies $10,500,000 $13,650,000 25.97% 3 $17,194,905 2010 2013

$162,092,901 Sub-Total

Bond Management & Administration 3% $4,862,787$166,955,688 Subtotal

Bond Contingency 8% $13,356,455

$180,312,143 Total

Assumptions:Bond Issue - February 2008

1) Middle SchoolDesign/Permit 2/09 - 4/10Bid 5/10Construction 6/10 - 12/11Midpoint of Construction 3/11

2) Classroom AdditionsDesign/Permit 2/09 - 1/10Bid 2/10Construction 3/10 - 11/10Midpoint of Construction 5/10

3) PPM RenovationDesign/Permit 10/09 - 2/11Bid 3/11Construction 4/11 - 7/12Midpoint of Construction 11/11

Hutteball Oremus Architecture, Inc.

CHAPTER III

WAC 392-341-025 (3)

Demographic data including population projections and projected economic growth and development.

: L L

MO

NR

OE

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT

HEA

D C

OU

NT

ENR

OLL

MEN

T

DA

TE10

/1/2

007

BIL

ING

UA

L: 4

56O

ut o

f Dis

t.C

LEFW

EFW

WFR

EM

BE

SWE

HR

MM

NM

PPM

MH

SLI

LSV

CSP

EDW

AV

AU

3TO

TAL

R.S

.K

85.0

052

.00

66.0

073

.00

57.0

074

.00

407.

001

92.0

080

.00

66.0

091

.00

76.0

071

.00

90.0

056

6.00

298

.00

45.0

068

.00

91.0

069

.00

95.0

053

.00

1.00

520.

003

85.0

063

.00

76.0

087

.00

76.0

084

.00

56.0

052

7.00

471

.00

37.0

079

.00

85.0

051

.00

79.0

054

.00

456.

005

91.0

063

.00

59.0

076

.00

89.0

075

.00

60.0

02.

0051

5.00

688

.00

167.

0018

2.00

75.0

01.

0051

3.00

798

.00

153.

0020

1.00

3.00

80.0

01.

0053

6.00

810

3.00

178.

0019

4.00

3.00

2.00

59.0

053

9.00

948

5.00

11.0

063

.00

1.00

167.

0072

7.00

1043

1.00

29.0

058

.00

1.00

97.0

061

6.00

1147

4.00

55.0

044

.00

2.00

575.

0012

365.

0010

0.00

35.0

01.

0017

6.00

677.

00TO

TA52

2.00

340.

0041

4.00

503.

0041

8.00

478.

0028

9.00

498.

0057

7.00

1761

.00

197.

0072

7.00

10.0

026

4.00

176.

0071

74.0

010

0.00

MO

NR

OE

SCH

OO

L D

ISTR

ICT

FTE

ENR

OLL

MEN

TO

ut o

f Dis

t.C

LEFW

EFW

WFR

EM

BE

SWE

HR

MM

NM

PPM

MH

SLI

LSV

CSP

EDW

AV

AU

3TO

TAL

K42

.50

26.0

033

.00

36.5

028

.50

37.0

020

3.50

192

.00

80.0

066

.00

91.0

076

.00

71.0

088

.91

564.

912

98.0

045

.00

68.0

091

.00

69.0

095

.00

52.9

31.

0051

9.93

385

.00

63.0

076

.00

87.0

076

.00

84.0

055

.36

526.

364

70.1

037

.00

79.0

085

.00

51.0

079

.00

53.9

545

5.05

591

.00

63.0

059

.00

76.0

089

.00

75.0

059

.73

2.00

514.

7327

84.4

86

88.0

016

6.20

182.

0074

.92

1.00

512.

127

98.0

015

2.40

201.

003.

0079

.37

1.00

534.

778

103.

0017

7.80

193.

573.

002.

0057

.44

536.

8115

83.7

09

484.

4011

.00

62.4

41.

0015

1.85

710.

6910

431.

8028

.40

56.5

31.

0090

.57

608.

3011

447.

5056

.30

38.9

62.

0054

4.76

1235

5.60

94.8

031

.39

1.00

176.

0065

8.79

2522

.54

TOTA

478.

6031

4.00

381.

0046

6.50

389.

5044

1.00

289.

0049

6.40

576.

5717

25.3

019

2.50

711.

9310

.00

242.

4217

6.00

6890

.72

FORM SPI 1066 (Rev. 10/07) Page 1 of 2

OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION ESD CO DIST School Facilities and Organization Old Capitol Building PO BOX 47200 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7200

(360) 725-6265 TTY (360) 664-3631

ENROLLMENT/CLASSROOM COUNT 2007–08

School District 1. ENROLLMENT REPORT AS OF LATEST OCTOBER 1 COUNT Enter the number of students with disabilities (as reported on actual October headcount enrollment) who are assigned to a

specially designated self-contained classroom for at least 100 minutes per school day. Enter pre-kindergarten students with disabilities at 50 percent of the actual headcount enrollment.

Grade October Enrollment per above definition

Pre-Kindergarten Kindergarten

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total 2. NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS BY FACILITY List by building the number of specially designed self-contained classrooms for students with disabilities and the number of

classrooms assigned to the regular instructional program.

Building Name Self-Contained Classrooms for

Students with Disabilities

Regular Classrooms/Teaching

Stations Return to: School Facilities and Organization Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Old Capitol Building PO BOX 47200 SIGNATURE OF SUPERINTENDENT/DESIGNEE DATE OLYMPIA WA 98504-7200 Fax Number: (360) 586-3946

FORM SPI 1066 (Rev. 10/07) Page 2 of 2

ESD

CO

DIST

2. NUMBER OF CLASSROOMS BY FACILITY (continued) List by building the number of specially designed self-contained classrooms for students with disabilities and the number of

classrooms assigned to the regular instructional program.

Building Name Self-Contained Classrooms for

Students with Disabilities

Regular Classrooms/Teaching

Stations

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ctEn

rollm

ent,

Dem

ogra

phic

Tre

nds a

nd P

roje

ctio

ns(U

pdat

ed w

ith S

choo

l Pro

ject

ions

)

Prep

ared

by

Will

iam

L. (

“Les

”) K

endr

ick

Edu

catio

n an

d Pl

anni

ng C

onsu

ltant

May

200

7

2D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Not

es o

n D

ata

•O

ctob

er h

eadc

ount

s are

use

d in

this

repo

rt to

trac

k en

rollm

ent t

rend

s. O

ctob

er d

ata

is u

sed

beca

use

it is

the

peak

enr

ollm

ent m

onth

form

any

dist

ricts

. In

addi

tion

Oct

ober

dat

a is

avai

labl

e fo

r all

dist

ricts

in th

e St

ate

back

to 1

972,

and

priv

ate

scho

ol a

nd o

ther

dat

a th

at is

use

d fo

r co

mpa

rativ

e pu

rpos

es is

ava

ilabl

e fo

r Oct

ober

of e

ach

year

.

•H

eadc

ount

dat

a is

use

d ra

ther

than

FTE

bec

ause

hea

dcou

nt

enro

llmen

ts a

re g

ener

ally

aff

ecte

d by

dem

ogra

phic

tren

ds, w

here

as

FTE

enro

llmen

ts a

re a

ffec

ted

by p

rogr

am o

ffer

ings

and

oth

er

cond

ition

s tha

t are

not

pre

dict

able

by

dem

ogra

phic

tren

ds.

•Th

e fo

reca

sts m

odel

s als

o us

e O

ctob

er h

eadc

ount

s but

they

can

be

conv

erte

d as

nec

essa

ry to

ave

rage

ann

ual h

eadc

ount

s and

/or F

TE a

s ne

eded

, bas

ed o

n hi

stor

ical

com

paris

ons.

3D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Enro

llmen

t Tre

nds

Mon

roe

and

the

Cou

nty

•En

rollm

ent i

n th

e M

onro

e sc

hool

dis

trict

has

bee

n in

crea

sing

stea

dily

sinc

e th

e 19

80’s

. Th

is tr

end

is p

artia

lly d

ue to

an

incr

ease

in b

irths

in 1

980’

s and

19

90’s

as t

he c

hild

ren

of b

aby

boom

ers e

nter

ed th

e sc

hool

s. A

nd it

is a

lso

due

to c

ontin

ued

hous

ing

and

popu

latio

n gr

owth

in th

e ea

ster

n an

d no

rther

n po

rtion

s of S

noho

mis

h co

unty

.

•M

onro

e’s e

nrol

lmen

t has

incr

ease

d at

a st

eady

pac

e ov

er th

e la

st15

yea

rs,

as h

as L

ake

Stev

ens.

Oth

er d

istri

cts,

like

Ever

ett,

have

seen

gro

wth

in so

me

parts

of t

heir

dist

rict b

ut d

eclin

es in

oth

ers.

And

Muk

ilteo

has

cont

inue

d to

gr

ow th

anks

to a

com

bina

tion

of n

ew h

ousi

ng a

nd a

mar

ked

incr

ease

in th

e EL

L po

pula

tion

with

in th

e di

stric

t.

•Th

e ot

her a

rea

of th

e co

unty

that

con

tinue

s to

grow

is th

e fa

r nor

th w

hich

in

clud

es th

e A

rling

ton

and

Snoh

omis

h di

stric

ts. T

he o

ne d

istri

ctth

at h

as

show

n a

mar

ked

decl

ine

sinc

e 20

00 is

Edm

onds

.

4D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Enro

llmen

t Tre

nds

Mon

roe

and

the

Cou

nty

•En

rollm

ent g

row

th c

ount

y-w

ide

show

ed a

dis

tinct

cha

nge

betw

een

1997

an

d 20

00, d

ue to

the

smal

ler b

irth

coho

rts o

f the

prio

r 5 y

ears

and

a

mar

ked

slow

-dow

n in

pop

ulat

ion

grow

th in

the

Puge

t Sou

nd R

egio

n.

Cou

nty-

wid

e en

rollm

ent i

ncre

ased

by

22,8

67 st

uden

ts b

etw

een

1991

and

20

00, b

ut h

as g

row

n by

onl

y 3,

548

stud

ents

sinc

e 20

00.

•Th

is c

hang

e in

the

enro

llmen

t pat

tern

is h

ardl

y no

ticea

ble

at a

ll in

the

Mon

roe

and

Lake

Ste

vens

scho

ol d

istri

cts.

Bot

h di

stric

ts h

ave,

for t

he m

ost

part,

con

tinue

d to

gro

w a

t a p

ace

betw

een

2000

and

200

6 th

at is

re

mar

kabl

y si

mila

r to

the

patte

rn th

at w

as se

en b

etw

een

1991

and

2000

. Th

is su

gges

ts th

at th

e ef

fect

s of n

ew h

ousi

ng a

nd p

opul

atio

n gr

owth

in

thes

e di

stric

ts h

as se

rved

to o

ffse

t the

ove

rall

slow

-dow

n th

at h

as h

it th

e co

unty

. The

onl

y no

ticea

ble

chan

ge h

as b

een

a sl

ight

slow

-dow

n in

el

emen

tary

gro

wth

in so

me

year

s (m

ost l

ikel

y du

e to

slig

htly

smal

ler b

irth

coho

rts).

But

this

has

gen

eral

ly b

een

offs

et b

y be

tter t

han

aver

age

grow

th

at th

e hi

gh sc

hool

or m

iddl

e sc

hool

leve

l in

a gi

ven

year

.

5D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Mon

roe

Enro

llmen

t Tre

nd19

91-2

006

Oct

ober

P22

3 En

rollm

ent

1972

-199

0 P1

05 S

tate

of W

ashi

ngto

n

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000 Oct-

72Oct-

73Oct-

74Oct-

75 Oct-76

Oct-77

Oct-78 Oct-79

Oct-80

Oct-81

Oct-82 Oct-83

Oct-84

Oct-85 Oct-86

Oct-87

Oct-88

Oct-89 Oct-90

Oct-91

Oct-92 Oct-93

Oct-94

Oct-95

Oct-96 Oct-97

Oct-98

Oct-99 O

ct-00 O

ct-01 O

ct-02 O

ct-03 O

ct_04 O

ct_05 Oct_06

6D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Mon

roe

Enro

llmen

t Tre

ndO

SPI P

223

1991

-200

6 D

ata

from

200

1 to

200

6 re

flect

s rev

isio

ns su

bmitt

ed b

y th

e D

istri

ctD

ata

from

199

1-20

00 re

pres

ents

the

orig

inal

enr

ollm

ent s

ubm

itted

by

the

Dis

trict

4102

4335

4484

4651

4799

4829

4957

5318

5584

5846

6115

6161

6323

6370

6637

6796

5.70

%

3.40

%3.

70%

3.20

%

0.60

%

2.70

%

7.30

%

5.00

%4.

70%

4.60

%

0.80

%

2.60

%

0.70

%

4.20

%

2.40

%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

Oct

-91

Oct

-92

Oct

-93

Oct

-94

Oct

-95

Oct

-96

Oct

-97

Oct

-98

Oct

-99

Oct

-00

Oct

-01

Oct

-02

Oct

-03

Oct

-04

Oct

-05

Oct

-06

00.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Enr

ollm

ent

Per

cent

Cha

nge

7D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Pu

blic

Sch

ools

En

rollm

ent T

rend

Dat

a m

ay n

ot re

flect

revi

sion

s sub

mitt

ed a

fter t

he o

rigin

al c

ount

dat

e

8217

185

696

8846

190

835

9314

296

709

9999

210

2512

1035

3910

5038

1063

6010

7092

1063

0310

6648

1079

2510

8586

4.3%

3.2%

2.7%

2.5%

3.8%

3.4%

2.5%

1.0%

1.4%

1.3%

0.7%

-0.7

%0.

3%1.

1%0.

6%

0

2000

0

4000

0

6000

0

8000

0

1000

00

1200

00

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

-0.0

3

-0.0

1

0.01

0.03

0.05

0.07

0.09

0.11

0.13

0.15

Enro

llmen

tP

erce

nt C

hang

e

8D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Mon

roe’

s Sha

re o

f Cou

nty

K-1

2 Pu

blic

Sc

hool

Enr

ollm

ent (

Oct

ober

)N

ote:

The

per

cent

may

not

refle

ct e

nrol

lmen

t cha

nges

subm

itted

afte

r the

cou

nt d

ate.

4.99

%5.

06%

5.07

%5.

12%

5.15

%4.

99%

4.96

%5.

19%

5.39

%5.

57%

5.69

%5.

75%

5.95

%5.

96%

6.15

%6.

26%

0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

9D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Pu

blic

Sch

ools

Elem

enta

ry E

nrol

lmen

t Tre

ndO

ct P

223

K-5

4232

443

472

4391

744

294

4504

546

183

4723

348

125

4797

948

181

4811

247

547

4678

246

631

4726

847

725

2.7%

1.0%

0.9%

1.7%

2.5%

2.3%

1.9%

-0.3

%0.

4%-0

.1%

-1.2

%-1

.6%

-0.3

%

1.4%

1.0%

0

1000

0

2000

0

3000

0

4000

0

5000

0

6000

0

7000

0

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

-0.0

3

-0.0

2

-0.0

1

00.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.1

Enr

ollm

ent

Per

cent

Cha

nge

The

effe

ct o

f sm

alle

r birt

h co

horts

and

slow

ing

pop.

gro

wth

star

ts

to b

e fe

lt in

the

late

199

0’s.

10D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Cha

nge

in E

nrol

lmen

t by

Dis

trict

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y O

ct -1

991

to O

ct -2

000

Not

e: D

ata

may

not

refle

ct e

nrol

lmen

t rev

isio

ns su

bmitt

ed a

fter t

he c

ount

dat

e

3279

2824

2594

2553

2302

2198

1744

1317

1317

996

822

676

214

229

-500

050

010

0015

0020

0025

0030

0035

0040

00

Muk

ilteo

(W/O

Skil

ls C

NTR)

*

Mar

ysvi

lle

Ever

ett

Lake

Ste

vens

Edm

onds

Stan

woo

d

Mon

roe

Arli

ngto

n

Snoh

omis

h

Gra

nite

Fal

ls

Lake

woo

d

Sulta

n

Skills

Cen

ter (

Muk

ilteo)

Darr

ingt

on

Inde

x

Tota

l net

cha

nge

in c

ount

y en

rollm

ent =

22,

867

11D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Cha

nge

in E

nrol

lmen

t by

Dis

trict

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y O

ct -2

000

to O

ct -2

006

Not

e: D

ata

may

not

refle

ct e

nrol

lmen

t rev

isio

ns su

bmitt

ed a

fter t

he c

ount

dat

e

950

905

803

718

596

299

117

9539353430-1

4-3

6-1

023

-200 0

-150 0

-100 0

-500

050

010

0015

0020

0025

0030

0035

0040

00

Mon

roe

Lake

Ste

vens

Snoh

omis

h

Muk

ilteo

(W/O

Skil

ls C

NTR)

*

Arli

ngto

n

Ever

ett

Gra

nite

Fal

ls

Lake

woo

d

Sulta

n

Mar

ysvi

lle

Stan

woo

d

Skills

Cen

ter

Inde

x

Darr

ingt

on

Edm

onds

Tota

l net

cha

nge

in C

ount

y En

rollm

ent =

3,5

48

12D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Puge

t Sou

nd P

ublic

Sch

ool E

nrol

lmen

t N

et C

hang

e in

Enr

ollm

ent

Kin

g, K

itsap

, Pie

rce,

& S

noho

mis

h C

ombi

ned

Sour

ce: O

SPI P

223

Enro

llmen

t Rep

orts

1242

7

1003

9

8860

8727

1261

8

9911

6517

1439

1189

4714

855

2397

376

3152

916

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

1000

0

1200

0

1400

0

1991

-19

9219

92-

1993

1993

-19

9419

94-

1995

1995

-19

9619

96-

1997

1997

-19

9819

98-

1999

1999

-20

0020

00-

2001

2001

-20

0220

02-

2003

2003

-20

0420

04-

2005

2005

-20

06

13D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

ELL

Enro

llmen

t in

Mon

roe

Oct

ober

Hea

dcou

ntTh

ese

coun

ts d

o no

t ref

lect

revi

sion

s sen

t afte

r the

off

icia

l cou

nt d

ate

OSP

I P22

3 En

rollm

ent R

epor

t

2143

4446

4760

6482

110

151

166

234

269

280

306

346

050100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

14D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Enro

llmen

t: Lo

okin

g fo

rwar

d•

Futu

re e

nrol

lmen

t tre

nds a

re m

ost r

elia

bly

pred

icte

d by

birt

h ra

tes,

gene

ral p

opul

atio

n gr

owth

and

the

targ

eted

loca

tion

of p

opul

atio

ns d

ue to

ne

w h

ousi

ng g

row

th. F

ocus

ing

on th

ese

fact

ors p

rovi

des t

he c

onte

xt fo

r un

ders

tand

ing

wha

t has

hap

pene

d in

the

past

and

wha

t is l

ikel

y to

hap

pen

in th

e fu

ture

.

•Th

e fo

llow

ing

sect

ion

look

s at p

ast t

rend

s in

birth

s, po

pula

tion

and

hous

ing

grow

th a

nd p

roje

ctio

ns o

f fut

ure

trend

s. Th

ese

proj

ectio

ns a

re

the

maj

or fa

ctor

s tha

t are

con

side

red

for p

redi

ctin

g fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent i

n th

e M

onro

e sc

hool

dis

trict

.

•A

fter e

xam

inin

g th

is d

ata

the

final

sect

ion

pres

ents

enr

ollm

ent f

orec

asts

fo

r the

dis

trict

bas

ed o

n m

odel

s tha

t pre

dict

cha

nges

in e

nrol

lmen

t bas

ed

on c

hang

es in

the

num

ber o

f cou

nty

birth

s, an

d ch

ange

s in

popu

latio

n an

d ho

usin

g gr

owth

with

in th

e di

stric

t’s b

ound

arie

s.

Dem

ogra

phic

For

ecas

tsB

irths

, Pop

ulat

ion

and

Hou

sing

16D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Birt

hs•

Birt

hs in

the

coun

ty a

nd n

atio

nwid

e be

gan

to in

crea

se in

the

1980

’s a

s ba

by b

oom

ers b

egin

to h

ave

child

ren.

Thi

s mar

ked

incr

ease

in b

irths

re

pres

ents

the

“ech

o” o

f the

bab

y bo

om, a

nd it

s eff

ects

wer

e fe

lt fr

om

1985

thro

ugh

2000

.

•Si

nce

that

tim

e bi

rths h

ave

tend

ed to

tren

d do

wn

or d

eclin

e sl

ight

ly

resu

lting

in sl

ower

ele

men

tary

gro

wth

in m

any

area

s aro

und

the

coun

try.

•B

irths

in S

noho

mis

h C

ount

y sh

ow a

sim

ilar p

atte

rn to

nat

iona

l tre

nds.

They

incr

ease

d be

twee

n 19

85 a

nd 1

993

and

then

star

ted

to tr

end

dow

n be

twee

n 19

94 a

nd 2

000.

Thi

s res

ulte

d in

slow

er e

lem

enta

ry e

nrol

lmen

t gr

owth

in th

e la

te 1

990’

s. Si

nce

2000

ann

ual b

irths

hav

e ra

nged

be

twee

n 83

00 a

nd 8

700

per y

ear,

until

200

5 w

hen

they

rose

to 8

934.

C

ount

y bi

rths f

or 2

006

have

not

yet

bee

n fin

aliz

ed.

17D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Birt

hs: L

ooki

ng F

orw

ard

•Th

e de

mog

raph

er fo

r the

Sta

te o

f Was

hing

ton

is p

redi

ctin

g a

mar

ked

incr

ease

in b

irths

stat

ewid

e be

twee

n 20

10 a

nd 2

020,

whi

ch is

like

ly to

re

sult

in a

subs

eque

nt in

crea

se in

K-1

2 en

rollm

ent.

•B

irths

hav

e av

erag

ed a

bout

850

0 pe

r yea

r ove

r the

pas

t 5 y

ears

. B

etw

een

2005

and

201

0 th

is a

vera

ge is

exp

ecte

d to

rise

to

appr

oxim

atel

y 9,

400

a ye

ar a

nd b

etw

een

2010

and

201

5 bi

rths w

illav

erag

e ov

er 1

0,00

0 a

year

cou

nty-

wid

e.

•Th

e la

rger

pro

ject

ed b

irth

coho

rts in

the

com

ing

year

s sug

gest

that

en

rollm

ent g

row

th w

ill li

kely

star

t to

incr

ease

at a

gre

ater

rate

(fro

m

curr

ent l

evel

s) so

mew

here

bet

wee

n 20

12 a

nd 2

020.

By

2015

it is

like

ly

that

all

dist

ricts

in th

e co

unty

will

be

grow

ing,

incl

udin

g Ed

mon

ds,

whe

re e

nrol

lmen

t has

dec

lined

sinc

e 20

00.

18D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y B

irths

Was

hing

ton

Stat

e D

epar

tmen

t of H

ealth

6646

6801

7390

7862

8286

8224

8128

8062

7833

7629

7921

8110

8352

8496

8545

8703

8344

8592

8675

8924

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

1000

0

1200

0

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Dec

line

in b

irths

was

follo

wed

by

a le

velin

g of

f and

subs

eque

nt

decl

ine

in e

lem

enta

ry e

nrol

lmen

t in

the

coun

ty.

19D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

ns o

f Birt

hs fo

r Sno

hom

ish

Cou

nty

Bas

ed o

n C

ount

y Po

pula

tion

fore

cast

s fro

m O

FM a

nd b

irth

rate

est

imat

es

8344

8592

8675

8924

9135

9219

9395

9574

9911

1007

210

236

1038

510

534

1065

0

010

0020

0030

0040

0050

0060

0070

0080

0090

0010

000

1100

012

000

1300

014

000

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Coh

orts

for 2

011

to 2

015

Ave

rage

:940

0 a

year

Coh

orts

for 2

016

to 2

020

Ave

rage

:10,

300

a ye

arA

ctua

l Birt

h C

ohor

ts fo

r K

Cla

sses

from

200

7 to

201

0

Proj

ectio

ns

20D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Popu

latio

n: C

ount

y an

d K

-12

•Th

e po

pula

tion

in S

noho

mis

h C

ount

y in

crea

sed

by a

ppro

xim

atel

y 2.

4%

betw

een

2005

and

200

6 ba

sed

on e

stim

ates

from

the

Off

ice

of F

inan

cial

M

anag

emen

t (O

FM) a

t the

Sta

te o

f Was

hing

ton.

Thi

s rat

e of

gro

wth

is

the

high

est s

ince

200

0, a

nd th

e ne

t gai

n in

the

popu

latio

n be

twee

n 20

05

and

2006

is th

e la

rges

t gai

n si

nce

the

perio

d be

twee

n 19

97 a

nd 1

998.

•In

gen

eral

pop

ulat

ion

grow

th in

Sno

hom

ish

Cou

nty

and

the

Puge

t Sou

nd

regi

on h

as b

een

slow

er in

rece

nt y

ears

than

it w

as in

the

late

198

0’s a

nd

early

199

0’s.

OFM

attr

ibut

es th

is c

hang

e in

the

late

199

0’s t

o th

e fa

ct

that

Cal

iforn

ia’s

eco

nom

y re

cove

red

from

a re

cess

ion,

hal

ting

the

flow

of

resi

dent

s fro

m th

at st

ate

to o

ther

wes

tern

stat

es. T

he m

ost r

ecen

t es

timat

es o

f the

pop

ulat

ion

sugg

est t

hat c

ount

y gr

owth

is tr

endi

ng c

lose

to

the

inte

rmed

iate

pro

ject

ion

from

OFM

.

21D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Popu

latio

n K

-12

•B

aby-

boom

ers s

till m

ake

up th

e gr

eate

st p

erce

ntag

e of

the

popu

latio

n in

the

coun

ty. A

nd e

ven

thou

gh K

-12

enro

llmen

t has

bee

n gr

owin

g co

unty

-wid

e, t

he p

erce

ntag

eof

the

popu

latio

n th

at is

K-1

2 ha

s bee

n de

clin

ing

in re

cent

yea

rs (o

ther

gro

ups a

re g

row

ing

at a

fast

er ra

te).

•Th

is tr

end

is e

xpec

ted

to st

art t

o ch

ange

bet

wee

n 20

10 a

nd 2

020

as

birth

s sta

rt to

rise

. Bet

wee

n 20

15 a

nd 2

020

it is

exp

ecte

d th

at th

e pe

rcen

tage

of t

he p

opul

atio

n th

at is

K-1

2 w

ill st

art t

o in

crea

se a

gain

.

•Lo

ng ra

nge

estim

ates

of K

-12

publ

ic sc

hool

enr

ollm

ent i

n th

e co

unty

su

gges

t tha

t the

cur

rent

pop

ulat

ion

of a

ppro

xim

atel

y 10

8,00

0 w

ill

incr

ease

to so

mew

here

bet

wee

n 13

4,00

0 an

d 14

0,00

0 by

202

0. T

he

mos

t dra

mat

ic ri

se is

like

ly to

occ

ur b

etw

een

2015

and

202

0.

22D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Po

pula

tion

Estim

ates

Sour

ce: O

FM S

tate

of W

ashi

ngto

n

483,

986

494,

286

507,

900

516,

500

525,

600

538,

100

551,

200

568,

100

583,

300

606,

024

618,

600

628,

000

637,

500

644,

800

655,

800

671,

800

2.1%

2.8%

1.7%

1.8%

2.4%

2.4%

3.1%

2.7%

3.8%

2.1%

1.5%

1.5%

1.1%

1.7%

2.4%

0

100,

000

200,

000

300,

000

400,

000

500,

000

600,

000

700,

000

800,

000

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

OFM Estim

ate

-1.0

%

1.0%

3.0%

5.0%

7.0%

9.0%

11.0

%

13.0

%

15.0

%

Popu

latio

nPe

rcen

t Inc

reas

e

23D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Net

Cha

nge

in S

noho

mis

h C

ount

y Po

pula

tion

Sour

ce: P

uget

Sou

nd R

egio

nal C

ounc

il R

evis

ed E

stim

ates

Bas

ed o

n 20

00 C

ensu

s

1522

9

13,0

1913

,871

9,55

310

,351

11,9

30

17,4

37

19,1

49

15,4

2514

,434

12,5

76

9,40

09,

500

7,30

0

11,0

00

16,0

00

0

5000

1000

0

1500

0

2000

0

2500

0

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

200

2-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

24D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Net

Cha

nge

in P

uget

Sou

nd P

opul

atio

n:K

ing,

Kits

ap, P

ierc

e &

Sno

hom

ish

OFM

Est

imat

es (N

ot A

djus

ted

for l

ates

t cen

sus d

ata)

68,9

67 29,6

36 15,5

9333,8

0847,6

68 36,7

4451,7

4764,0

1675,8

6784,3

84 77,7

05 61,8

00 57,9

28 31,8

0041,9

00 36,8

0044,3

0048,6

00 40,3

0043,0

2647,9

00 38,3

01 25,5

0029,1

0043,8

0163,6

00

0

1000

0

2000

0

3000

0

4000

0

5000

0

6000

0

7000

0

8000

0

9000

0 1980

-81 1981

-82 1982

-83 1983

-84 1984

-85 1985

-86 1986

-87 1987

-88 1988

-89 1989

-90 1990

-91 1991

-92 1992

-93 1993

-94 1994

-95 1995

-96 1996

-97 1997

-98 1998

-99 1999

-00 2000

-01 2001

-02 2002

-03 2003

-04 2004

-05 2005

-06

25D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Po

pula

tion

Fore

cast

Low

, Med

ium

, and

Hig

h Po

pula

tion

Fore

cast

sSo

urce

: OFM

Sta

te o

f Was

hing

ton

5500

0065

0000

7500

0085

0000

9500

0010

5000

011

5000

0

2005

Pop

. Est

im.

655,

800

Low

606,

024

634,

232

676,

708

717,

312

759,

087

795,

725

Med

ium

606,

024

666,

735

728,

937

793,

720

862,

599

929,

314

Hig

h60

6,02

469

9,23

878

1,80

687

0,11

696

6,91

11,

062,

903

Cen

sus

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

The

popu

latio

n es

timat

e fr

om

2005

is c

lose

to th

e m

ediu

m

proj

ectio

n

26D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y K

-12

Publ

ic S

choo

l En

rollm

ent F

orec

asts

Proj

ectio

n B

ased

on

OFM

Age

5-1

9 Fo

reca

sts a

nd L

ates

t Pop

. Est

imat

es

100,

000

110,

000

120,

000

130,

000

140,

000

Low

107,

925

109,

704

112,

500

121,

241

131,

935

Med

ium

107,

925

111,

943

114,

796

123,

715

134,

628

Hig

h10

7,92

511

4,22

811

7,13

912

6,24

013

7,37

5

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

P223

Cou

nty

Enro

llmen

t Oct

20

05

27D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Popu

latio

n in

the

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ct•

Bet

wee

n th

e 19

90 a

nd 2

000

cens

us, t

he p

opul

atio

n in

the

Mon

roe

scho

ol

dist

rict g

rew

by

over

11,

000

resi

dent

s. B

ased

on

data

from

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

and

the

Stat

e of

Was

hing

ton

it is

est

imat

ed th

at th

e re

side

nt

popu

latio

n of

the

dist

rict i

n 20

06 w

as a

ppro

xim

atel

y 36

,000

.

•D

ata

from

the

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y of

fice

of p

lann

ing

from

Dec

embe

r 20

05 e

stim

ates

that

the

Dis

trict

’s p

opul

atio

n w

ill b

e ju

st u

nder

40,0

00

resi

dent

s by

2011

, and

will

exc

eed

50,0

00 b

y 20

25.

•A

lthou

gh e

stim

ates

from

the

coun

ty p

lann

ing

offic

e ar

e re

ason

able

, the

re

are

othe

r est

imat

es th

at su

gges

t the

pop

ulat

ion

mig

ht tr

end

high

er. T

he

Puge

t Sou

nd R

egio

nal C

ounc

il’s f

orec

ast o

f pop

ulat

ion

and

hous

ing

for

neig

hbor

hood

are

as in

and

aro

und

Mon

roe

pred

icts

hig

her g

row

th ra

tes

than

the

coun

ty p

lann

ing

offic

e.

28D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Popu

latio

n in

the

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ct•

Dat

a fr

om P

SRC

sugg

est t

hat M

onro

e’s p

opul

atio

n co

uld

be a

ppro

xim

atel

y 41

,000

by

the

2010

cen

sus a

nd tr

end

to 4

9,00

0 by

202

0. T

hese

diff

erin

g es

timat

es o

f the

pop

ulat

ion

(PSR

C a

nd th

e C

ount

y) c

an b

e us

ed a

spar

t of t

he

basi

s for

mak

ing

a lo

w a

nd h

igh

proj

ectio

n of

Mon

roe’

s fut

ure

K-1

2 en

rollm

ent.

•A

lthou

gh p

opul

atio

n gr

owth

is ty

pica

lly c

orre

late

d w

ith e

nrol

lmen

t gro

wth

, it

is im

porta

nt to

rem

embe

r tha

t mos

t dis

trict

s in

the

coun

ty w

ill in

crea

se th

eir

popu

latio

n be

twee

n no

w a

nd 2

020.

Gro

wth

per

se is

not

that

impo

rtant

. K-1

2 gr

owth

is li

kely

to b

e m

ore

dram

atic

in d

istri

cts t

hat i

ncre

ase

thei

r per

cent

age

or sh

are

of th

e co

unty

pop

ulat

ion.

•C

ompa

ring

Mon

roe’

s pro

ject

ed p

opul

atio

n (u

sing

the

PSR

C e

stim

ate)

to th

e m

ediu

m c

ount

y pr

ojec

tion

we

wou

ld p

redi

ct th

at M

onro

e w

ill in

crea

se it

s sh

are

of th

e po

pula

tion

over

tim

e (s

ee th

e ch

art o

n pa

ge 3

1), a

nd su

bseq

uent

ly

incr

ease

its s

hare

of c

ount

y K

-12

enro

llmen

t.

29D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ctR

esid

ent P

opul

atio

n So

urce

: Cen

sus a

nd P

uget

Sou

nd R

egio

nal C

ounc

il Es

timat

es o

f Pro

ject

ed G

row

th in

an

d A

roun

d th

e M

onro

e Sc

hool

Dis

trict

20,0

69

31,8

31

36,0

00

05,

000

10,0

0015

,000

20,0

0025

,000

30,0

0035

,000

40,0

00

Cen

sus 1

990

Cen

sus 2

000

2006

Est

imat

e

Not

e: T

he la

test

200

6 Es

timat

e is

bas

ed o

n N

ew H

ome

Tren

ds d

ata

rega

rdin

g ho

me

sale

s sin

ce 2

000

30D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ctR

esid

ent P

opul

atio

n Fo

reca

sts

Sour

ce: S

noho

mis

h C

ount

y Pl

anni

ngPu

get S

ound

Reg

iona

l Cou

ncil

Estim

ates

of G

row

th fo

r N

eigh

borh

oods

In a

nd A

roun

d M

onro

e

30,0

00

35,0

00

40,0

00

45,0

00

50,0

00

55,0

00

Base

d on

PSR

C N

eigh

borh

ood

Fore

cast

36,0

0041

,000

45,0

0049

,000

53,0

00

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Pl

anni

ng (D

ec 2

005)

36,0

0039

,927

50,2

77

2006

Est

imat

e20

1020

1120

1520

2020

25

31D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Snoh

omis

h C

ount

y Po

pula

tion

Fore

cast

OFM

Med

ium

Ran

ge C

ount

y Fo

reca

st

The

char

t als

o sh

ows M

onro

e’s r

esid

ent p

opul

atio

n as

a p

erce

ntag

e of

the

coun

ty

popu

latio

n (R

esid

ent P

opul

atio

n ba

sed

on th

e PS

RC

neig

hbor

hood

fore

cast

)

6.38

%6.

52%

6.68

%6.

80%

0

100,

000

200,

000

300,

000

400,

000

500,

000

600,

000

700,

000

800,

000

900,

000

1,00

0,00

0

2010

2015

2020

2025

3.00

%

3.50

%

4.00

%

4.50

%

5.00

%

5.50

%

6.00

%

6.50

%

7.00

%

Cou

nty

Pop

ulat

ion

Mon

roe

Sch

ool D

istri

ct R

esid

ent P

op. A

s a

% o

f Cou

nty

Pop

.

32D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Hou

sing

in M

onro

e•

The

num

ber o

f hou

ses i

n th

e M

onro

e sc

hool

dis

trict

incr

ease

d fr

om 6

,626

in

the

1990

cen

sus t

o 10

,718

uni

ts b

y th

e 20

00 c

ensu

s. O

n av

erag

e,ap

prox

imat

ely

400

new

hou

sing

uni

ts w

ere

adde

d an

nual

ly b

etw

een

1990

an

d 20

00. S

ince

200

0 (b

ased

on

data

from

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

and

OFM

) th

e di

stric

t has

bee

n ad

ding

app

roxi

mat

ely

200

hous

ing

units

ann

ually

due

to

new

con

stru

ctio

n (s

ingl

e-fa

mily

and

mul

ti-fa

mily

).

•U

sing

dat

a fr

om th

e PS

RC

nei

ghbo

rhoo

d fo

reca

sts (

for a

reas

in a

nd a

roun

d M

onro

e) w

e ca

n es

timat

e th

at o

ver 8

5% o

f the

hou

ses i

n th

e di

stric

t are

si

ngle

-fam

ily. T

he p

ropo

rtion

of m

ulti-

fam

ily u

nits

is p

roje

cted

to in

crea

se

in M

onro

e an

d co

unty

-wid

e be

twee

n no

w a

nd 2

020

due

to a

n em

phas

is o

n gr

eate

r den

sity

. But

eve

n w

ith th

is in

crea

se it

is li

kely

that

by

2020

ap

prox

imat

ely

80%

of t

he h

ouse

s in

the

dist

rict w

ill b

e si

ngle

-fam

ily h

omes

.

•It

is c

urre

ntly

est

imat

ed th

at th

ere

are

12,0

00 h

ousi

ng u

nits

inth

e M

onro

e sc

hool

dis

trict

. The

PSR

C fo

reca

st su

gges

ts th

at th

e nu

mbe

r of h

omes

in th

e di

stric

t will

incr

ease

to so

mew

here

bet

wee

n 15

,000

and

17,

000

by20

20.

33D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Hou

sing

in M

onro

e•

Ass

umin

g th

at th

e ho

usin

g st

ock

incr

ease

s to

15,0

00 b

y 20

20 th

isw

ould

m

ean

the

addi

tion

of 3

000

units

ove

r 14

year

s (ap

prox

imat

ely

214

per y

ear)

. If

the

tota

l tre

nds t

owar

d 17

,000

uni

ts b

y 20

20 th

is w

ould

repr

esen

t an

incr

ease

just

ove

r 350

uni

ts a

nnua

lly. S

imila

r to

the

popu

latio

nes

timat

es

thes

e di

ffer

ing

estim

ates

of h

ousi

ng g

row

th c

an b

e us

ed a

s the

bas

is fo

r m

akin

g a

low

and

hig

h ra

nge

proj

ectio

n of

futu

re e

nrol

lmen

t.

•B

ased

on

data

from

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

ther

e ar

e cu

rren

tly 1

00 n

ew si

ngle

fa

mily

hom

es a

nd 5

1 m

ulti-

fam

ily h

omes

for s

ale

or re

nt w

ithin

the

dist

rict’s

bo

unda

ries.

Ther

e ar

e 45

6 si

ngle

fam

ily h

omes

and

285

mul

ti-fa

mily

uni

ts

prop

osed

for f

utur

e co

nstru

ctio

n an

d sa

le w

ithin

the

dist

rict’s

bou

ndar

ies.

In

gene

ral m

ost n

ew m

ulti-

fam

ily a

nd si

ngle

fam

ily h

omes

are

bui

lt ou

t and

so

ld so

mew

here

bet

wee

n 3-

5 ye

ars f

rom

the

date

of a

pplic

atio

n (d

ata

from

N

ew H

ome

Tren

ds).

Thi

s sug

gest

s tha

t the

dis

trict

is li

kely

to se

e ap

prox

imat

ely

200

new

hou

sing

uni

ts a

nnua

lly b

etw

een

now

and

201

0.

34D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Hou

sing

Gro

wth

in th

e M

onro

e Sc

hool

Dis

trict

Sour

ce: C

ensu

s Dat

a

0

2,00

0

4,00

0

6,00

0

8,00

0

10,0

00

12,0

00

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

Hou

ses

6,62

610

,718

Avg

. Hou

seho

ld S

ize

3.02

2.97

1990

Cen

sus

2000

Cen

sus

35D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

New

Hou

sing

Con

stru

ctio

n in

the

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ctSo

urce

: New

Hom

e Tr

ends

App

roxi

mat

e bu

ild-o

ut ti

me

for M

ulti-

fam

ily is

3 y

ears

from

the

date

of a

pplic

atio

n; S

ingl

e fa

mily

5 y

ears

from

the

date

of a

pplic

atio

n

5110

0

285

456

0

100

200

300

400

500

Mul

ti-fa

mily

Uni

tsSi

ngle

-Fam

ily U

nits

Cur

rent

ly S

ellin

gPr

opos

ed fo

r Fu

ture

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d Sa

le

Proj

ectio

ns

37D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

n M

etho

dolo

gy•

Bas

ed o

n hi

stor

ical

ana

lysi

s it w

as d

eter

min

ed th

at th

e be

st p

redi

ctor

s of

enro

llmen

t for

the

Mon

roe

dist

rict a

re c

ount

y bi

rths,

and

the

proj

ecte

d po

pula

tion

and

hous

ing

grow

th w

ithin

the

dist

rict’s

bou

ndar

ies.

Thes

e m

easu

res w

ere

used

to c

reat

e a

pred

ictiv

e m

odel

that

wou

ld e

stim

ate

futu

re

enro

llmen

t in

the

dist

rict b

etw

een

now

and

202

0.

•K

inde

rgar

ten

enro

llmen

t was

pro

ject

ed b

ased

on

the

assu

mpt

ion

that

the

dist

rict’s

kin

derg

arte

n en

rollm

ent w

ould

cha

nge

in re

latio

n to

the

proj

ecte

d ch

ange

in b

irths

ove

r tim

e. E

nrol

lmen

t at g

rade

s 1-1

2 w

as p

roje

cted

bas

ed o

n ex

pect

ed g

row

th in

hou

sing

and

pop

ulat

ion

with

in th

e di

stric

t’s b

ound

arie

s ov

er ti

me.

•A

coh

ort s

urvi

val m

odel

was

als

o cr

eate

d to

look

at c

hang

es in

gra

de-to

-gra

de

grow

th. I

n ge

nera

l, th

e co

hort

mod

el p

rodu

ces r

esul

ts th

at a

re si

mila

r to

the

pred

ictiv

e m

odel

bas

ed o

n bi

rths,

popu

latio

n an

d ho

usin

g. H

owev

er, f

or

proj

ectio

ns b

eyon

d 3

year

s, co

hort

surv

ival

tend

s to

have

a h

ighe

r err

or ra

te

than

mul

tiple

regr

essi

on a

nd o

ther

line

ar m

odel

s (G

rip &

You

ng, 1

999)

.

38D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

n M

etho

dolo

gy•

Two

sepa

rate

pro

ject

ions

mod

els w

ere

crea

ted,

a m

ediu

m ra

nge

proj

ectio

n an

d a

high

rang

e. T

he m

ediu

m ra

nge

mod

el a

ssum

es lo

wer

ho

usin

g an

d po

pula

tion

grow

th w

ithin

the

dist

rict’s

bou

ndar

ies t

han

does

the

high

rang

e m

odel

. Th

e hi

gh ra

nge

mod

el is

bas

ed o

n th

em

ost

optim

istic

fore

cast

s of h

ousi

ng a

nd p

opul

atio

n gr

owth

with

in th

edi

stric

t’s b

ound

arie

s. B

oth

mod

els u

se a

wei

ghte

d 3

year

ave

rage

co

hort

surv

ival

rate

to p

redi

ct g

row

th a

t eac

h gr

ade.

•A

pop

ulat

ion

and

hous

ing

grow

th fa

ctor

is a

dded

to e

ach

mod

el to

adju

st th

e en

rollm

ent o

ver t

ime

so th

at th

e ov

eral

l tot

al m

atch

es th

e pr

edic

tions

bas

ed o

n th

e lin

ear m

odel

. Th

is a

llow

s us t

o pr

edic

t gr

owth

by

grad

e (u

sing

coh

ort s

urvi

val)

whi

le a

lso

insu

ring

that

the

over

all t

otal

is p

roje

cted

to b

e cl

ose

to th

e re

sults

of t

he li

near

mod

els

that

pre

dict

the

tota

l enr

ollm

ent u

sing

birth

s, po

pula

tion,

and

hou

sing

.

39D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

n M

etho

dolo

gyO

ther

Con

side

ratio

ns•

Som

e co

nsid

erat

ion

was

als

o gi

ven

to o

ther

fact

ors t

hat m

ight

aff

ect

enro

llmen

t. Fo

r exa

mpl

e, th

e di

stric

t has

seen

a st

eady

incr

ease

in it

s EL

L po

pula

tion

over

the

last

seve

ral y

ears

, esp

ecia

lly si

nce

2000

. Th

is tr

end

is si

mila

r to

the

coun

ty-w

ide

trend

of g

row

th in

this

po

pula

tion

and

refle

cts t

he m

arke

d in

crea

se in

His

pani

c im

mig

ratio

n in

to th

e co

unty

.

•In

gen

eral

, dis

trict

s with

a la

rge

His

pani

c EL

L po

pula

tions

will

tend

to

see

larg

er e

nrol

lmen

t gai

ns o

ver t

ime.

Thi

s occ

urs b

ecau

se

His

pani

c bi

rth ra

tes t

end

to b

e hi

gher

than

thos

e fo

r oth

er g

roup

s. A

n in

crea

se in

the

His

pani

c po

pula

tion

in a

n ar

ea w

ill m

ost l

ikel

y be

ac

com

pani

ed b

y sh

arp

incr

ease

s in

enro

llmen

t whe

n bi

rth tr

ends

be

gin

to c

ycle

bac

k up

.

40D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

ns M

etho

ds

Oth

er C

onsi

dera

tions

Con

tinue

d•

Alth

ough

ther

e ar

e so

me

indi

catio

ns th

at M

onro

e m

ight

see

a gr

eate

r en

rollm

ent g

ain

due

to a

n in

crea

se in

the

His

pani

c po

pula

tion,

the

evid

ence

at

this

tim

e is

inco

nclu

sive

. Alth

ough

Mon

roe’

s His

pani

c po

pula

tion

has b

een

grow

ing

at a

rate

that

is fa

ster

than

the

coun

ty ra

te, o

ther

dis

trict

s, lik

e M

ukilt

eo, h

ave

seen

a m

ore

dram

atic

rise

(esp

ecia

lly a

mon

g th

e im

mig

rant

H

ispa

nic

popu

latio

n) d

ue to

a l

arge

num

ber o

f mul

ti-fa

mily

rent

al u

nits

. Th

ese

affo

rdab

le re

ntal

uni

ts a

re a

ttrac

tive

loca

tions

for n

ew im

mig

rant

po

pula

tions

as t

hey

gain

a fo

otho

ld in

the

com

mun

ity. T

he g

reat

er p

ropo

rtion

of

such

uni

ts in

pla

ces l

ike

Muk

ilteo

is c

orre

late

d w

ith th

e gr

owth

of H

ispa

nic

ELL

popu

latio

ns in

that

dis

trict

.

•D

ata

from

Kin

g C

ount

y te

nds t

o co

nfirm

this

con

clus

ion.

Alth

ough

man

y di

stric

ts h

ave

seen

an

incr

ease

in th

eir H

ispa

nic

and

ELL

popu

latio

ns in

Kin

g C

ount

y, E

LL g

row

th (a

nd H

ispa

nic

ELL

grow

th g

ener

ally

) ha

s ten

ded

to

conc

entra

te in

the

Hig

hlin

e sc

hool

dis

trict

, jus

t sou

th o

f Sea

ttle

whe

re th

ere

is

a ba

lanc

ed m

ix o

f aff

orda

ble

mul

ti-fa

mily

rent

al u

nits

and

sing

le fa

mily

ho

mes

.

41D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

n M

etho

dsTh

inki

ng B

eyon

d 20

10•

It is

use

ful t

o re

-iter

ate

that

the

loca

tion

of th

e H

ispa

nic

imm

igra

nt a

nd

non-

imm

igra

nt p

opul

atio

ns c

ount

y-w

ide

is a

crit

ical

(and

som

ewha

t un

know

n) fa

ctor

that

will

influ

ence

futu

re e

nrol

lmen

t. Th

e di

stric

ts w

hich

pr

ove

mos

t attr

activ

e to

thes

e su

b-gr

oups

in th

e po

pula

tion

are

likel

y to

se

e a

dist

inct

gro

wth

spik

e (d

ue to

hig

her H

ispa

nic

birth

rate

s)th

an so

me

of th

e ot

her d

istri

cts i

n th

e co

unty

. Thi

s is e

spec

ially

true

for t

he p

erio

d be

twee

n 20

10 a

nd 2

020

whe

n th

e ki

nder

garte

n co

horts

are

exp

ecte

dto

be

larg

er. T

he c

ensu

s upd

ate

in 2

010

will

pro

vide

a g

ood

indi

catio

nof

whe

re

His

pani

c po

pula

tions

hav

e se

ttled

ove

r the

pas

t dec

ade.

Onc

e th

is

info

rmat

ion

is k

now

n it

can

be in

corp

orat

ed in

to u

pdat

ed e

nrol

lmen

t fo

reca

sts.

42D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ecte

d Tr

ends

Dis

trict

Enr

ollm

ent

•Th

e m

ediu

m ra

nge

mod

el p

redi

cts t

hat e

nrol

lmen

t will

tren

d to

just

ov

er 7

300

by 2

010

and

to ju

st u

nder

880

0 by

202

0.

•Th

e hi

gh ra

nge

mod

el p

redi

cts t

hat e

nrol

lmen

t will

tren

d to

750

0by

20

10 a

nd to

mor

e th

an 9

100

stud

ents

by

2020

.

•B

oth

mod

els p

redi

ct m

ore

grow

th a

t ele

men

tary

than

at t

he m

iddl

esc

hool

and

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l fro

m n

ow th

roug

h 20

10.

•Th

e lo

ng ra

nge

med

ium

fore

cast

sugg

est t

hat t

he d

istri

ct c

ould

add

an

addi

tiona

l 100

0 el

emen

tary

stud

ents

by

2020

, app

roxi

mat

ely

500

mid

dle

scho

ol st

uden

ts, a

nd o

ver 6

00 h

igh

scho

ol st

uden

ts T

he h

igh

rang

e fo

reca

st p

redi

cts s

light

ly g

reat

er to

tals

at e

ach

leve

l.

Det

aile

d N

umbe

rs

Oct

ober

Hea

dcou

nt P

roje

ctio

ns b

y G

rade

Med

ium

and

Hig

h R

ange

For

ecas

t

44D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ct (O

ctob

er E

nrol

lmen

t His

tory

)Sn

ohom

ish

Coun

ty B

irths

Birth

Yea

r19

8619

8719

8819

8919

9019

9119

9219

9319

9419

9519

9619

9719

9819

9920

0020

01Co

unty

Birth

s66

4668

0173

9078

6282

8682

2481

2880

6278

3376

2979

2181

1083

5284

9685

4587

03Pc

t of C

ohor

t4.

59%

5.16

%4.

44%

4.29

%4.

68%

3.98

%4.

43%

4.71

%4.

81%

5.23

%4.

65%

4.71

%4.

48%

4.78

%5.

10%

5.01

%Co

hort

Enro

llmen

t Hist

ory

(Not

e: C

ount

s fro

m 1

991

to 2

000

are

the

Orig

inal P

223

coun

ts) 2

001-

2006

Ref

lect R

evisi

ons

3 Yr

.Oc

t-91

Oct-9

2Oc

t-93

Oct-9

4Oc

t-95

Oct-9

6Oc

t-97

Oct-9

8Oc

t-99

Oct-0

0 O

ct-0

1Oc

t-02

Oct-0

3Oc

t-04

Oct-0

5Oc

t-06

Wei

ghte

dK

305

351

328

337

388

327

360

380

377

399

368

382

374

406

436

436

0.05

01

359

331

395

355

394

406

371

425

422

421

448

451

466

436

515

532

1.22

02

371

365

340

416

364

402

408

408

453

455

481

478

466

461

453

512

1.00

83

369

374

384

348

415

363

438

452

435

494

472

482

472

474

487

457

1.02

64

340

366

369

382

358

415

357

456

468

472

503

485

485

473

495

507

1.03

65

359

349

377

388

373

360

410

400

482

499

497

491

500

491

491

505

1.02

56

332

378

364

378

384

381

378

474

447

496

524

494

510

508

517

499

1.02

87

360

344

384

384

378

394

379

402

484

455

505

510

514

509

525

540

1.03

38

281

365

345

389

398

382

403

373

417

499

468

512

515

522

529

538

1.02

89

271

304

380

369

388

398

496

487

405

454

532

470

538

508

558

518

1.01

010

268

280

297

370

356

435

397

472

526

404

465

531

514

526

517

565

1.00

811

277

260

267

274

344

279

312

294

354

460

416

430

502

491

523

526

0.99

912

210

268

254

261

259

287

248

295

314

338

436

445

467

565

591

661

1.22

1To

tal

4102

4335

4484

4651

4799

4829

4957

5318

5584

5846

6115

6161

6323

6370

6637

6796

Chan

ge23

314

916

714

830

128

361

266

262

269

4616

247

267

159

% C

hang

e5.

7%3.

4%3.

7%3.

2%0.

6%2.

7%7.

3%5.

0%4.

7%4.

6%0.

8%2.

6%0.

7%4.

2%2.

4%

Enro

llmen

t by

Leve

lK-

521

0321

3621

9322

2622

9222

7323

4425

2126

3727

4027

6927

6927

6327

4128

7729

49 6

-897

310

8710

9311

5111

6011

5711

6012

4913

4814

5014

9715

1615

3915

3915

7115

77 9

-12

1026

1112

1198

1274

1347

1399

1453

1548

1599

1656

1849

1876

2021

2090

2189

2270

Chan

ge b

y Le

vel

K-5

3357

3366

-19

7117

711

610

329

0-6

-22

136

72 6

-811

46

589

-33

8999

102

4719

230

326

9-1

286

8676

7352

5495

5157

193

2714

569

9981

45D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

nP

roje

cted

Med

ium

Ran

ge F

orec

ast

Birt

hs20

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

15P

opul

atio

n83

4485

9286

7589

2491

3592

1993

9595

7499

1110

072

1023

610

385

1053

410

650

Hou

sing

4.98

%5.

01%

5.02

%5.

01%

5.02

%5.

03%

5.04

%5.

05%

5.06

%5.

07%

5.08

%5.

09%

5.09

%5.

10%

Gro

wth

Per

cent

Cha

nge

in B

irths

5 (y

r)4.

4%11

.1%

7.5%

Fact

or O

ct-0

7 O

ct-0

8O

ct-0

9O

ct-1

0O

ct-1

1O

ct-1

2O

ct-1

3 O

ct-1

4O

ct-1

5O

ct-1

6O

ct-1

7O

ct-1

8O

ct-1

9O

ct-2

0Le

vel

2007

K41

643

043

544

745

946

447

448

350

351

052

052

853

754

4K

-51.

007

153

851

152

853

854

756

156

858

059

261

662

563

664

665

7 6

-81.

005

254

354

751

853

754

455

456

857

458

659

862

363

264

365

4 9

-12

1.00

53

532

561

565

536

552

560

570

584

591

603

616

641

650

662

2008

-10

447

955

458

558

955

657

458

159

260

761

462

764

066

667

5K

-51.

007

552

649

457

260

460

657

259

059

860

862

463

164

465

868

4 6

-81.

005

652

654

451

159

162

262

458

960

861

662

764

365

066

467

8 9

-12

1.00

57

518

546

564

530

612

644

646

610

629

638

649

666

673

687

2011

-20

855

853

556

458

354

663

166

366

562

964

865

766

968

669

3K

-51.

003

954

656

754

457

359

055

363

867

267

463

665

666

567

769

4 6

-81.

002

1052

555

457

455

157

959

655

964

567

968

164

366

367

268

4 9

-12

1.00

211

567

527

556

577

552

579

597

560

646

680

682

644

664

673

All

grad

es12

645

696

647

682

705

675

709

731

685

790

831

834

787

812

2021

-25

0.99

9To

tal

6919

7065

7164

7337

7471

7587

7752

7901

8043

8264

8400

8509

8621

8796

Cha

nge

123

146

9917

313

311

616

514

914

222

113

610

911

217

4%

Cha

nge

1.9%

2.1%

1.4%

2.4%

1.8%

1.5%

2.2%

1.9%

1.8%

2.7%

1.6%

1.3%

1.3%

2.0%

Enro

llmen

t by

Leve

lK

-530

3330

9732

0432

5032

6432

8433

5034

1134

8735

6536

4037

2037

9938

75 6

-816

0216

2516

3917

0517

8118

9918

9918

8318

7319

1219

4919

8420

2220

58 9

-12

2284

2344

2321

2382

2426

2404

2503

2607

2683

2787

2812

2805

2800

2863

Cha

nge

by L

evel

K-5

8464

107

4614

2066

6176

7875

8079

76 6

-825

2315

6676

118

0-1

6-1

039

3636

3836

9-1

214

60-2

362

43-2

210

010

476

104

25-7

-563

46D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

nP

roje

cted

Hig

h R

ange

For

ecas

tB

irths

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Pop

ulat

ion

8344

8592

8675

8924

9135

9219

9395

9574

9911

1007

210

236

1038

510

534

1065

0H

ousi

ng4.

98%

5.01

%5.

02%

5.06

%5.

07%

5.08

%5.

09%

5.10

%5.

11%

5.12

%5.

13%

5.14

%5.

15%

5.15

%G

row

thP

erce

nt C

hang

e in

Birt

hs 5

(yr)

4.4%

11.1

%7.

5%Fa

ctor

Oct

-07

Oct

-08

Oct

-09

Oct

-10

Oct

-11

Oct

-12

Oct

-13

Oct

-14

Oct

-15

Oct

-16

Oct

-17

Oct

-18

Oct

-19

Oct

-20

Leve

l20

07K

416

430

435

452

463

468

478

488

508

516

525

533

542

549

K-5

1.01

71

544

516

534

543

556

570

576

588

601

625

634

645

656

667

6-8

1.01

52

548

558

529

547

552

565

579

586

598

610

635

644

656

667

9-1

21.

015

353

757

258

255

256

657

158

459

960

661

863

165

766

767

920

08-1

04

484

566

603

613

576

591

596

610

625

632

646

659

686

696

K-5

1.01

75

531

504

589

628

633

595

610

616

630

646

653

667

681

708

6-8

1.01

56

531

554

526

615

650

655

616

632

637

652

668

676

690

704

9-1

21.

015

752

355

758

155

263

967

568

164

065

666

267

769

570

271

720

11-2

08

563

546

581

607

571

661

698

704

662

679

685

701

719

726

K-5

1.00

89

552

578

560

596

617

580

672

710

716

673

690

696

712

730

6-8

1.00

610

530

565

591

573

604

625

589

682

720

726

682

700

706

722

9-1

21.

006

1157

353

857

360

057

660

862

959

268

672

473

068

670

471

0A

ll gr

ades

1265

271

066

671

073

770

874

677

272

784

288

989

684

286

420

21-2

51.

004

Tota

l69

8471

9373

5175

8777

4078

7380

5582

1883

7186

0587

4688

5689

6291

40

Cha

nge

188

209

158

236

153

132

182

163

153

234

141

110

107

177

% C

hang

e2.

8%3.

0%2.

2%3.

2%2.

0%1.

7%2.

3%2.

0%1.

9%2.

8%1.

6%1.

3%1.

2%2.

0%

Enro

llmen

t by

Leve

lK

-530

5931

4532

7233

3533

4633

6034

2434

8735

6836

4837

2438

0638

8739

65 6

-816

1816

5716

8817

7418

6019

9219

9519

7519

5519

9320

3120

7121

1121

48 9

-12

2307

2390

2391

2478

2534

2521

2636

2756

2848

2965

2991

2978

2964

3027

Cha

nge

by L

evel

K-5

110

8612

763

1114

6463

8180

7682

8178

6-8

4139

3185

8613

23

-19

-20

3838

4140

37 9

-12

3784

088

55-1

311

512

092

117

27-1

3-1

462

Scho

ol P

roje

ctio

ns

48D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Scho

ol P

roje

ctio

ns•

Scho

ol e

nrol

lmen

ts w

ere

proj

ecte

d fo

r the

per

iod

from

200

7 to

201

2. T

hese

pr

ojec

tions

ass

ume

that

scho

ol c

onfig

urat

ions

, bou

ndar

ies a

nd p

rogr

ams w

ill

rem

ain

the

sam

e du

ring

this

tim

e pe

riod.

And

they

ass

ume

that

cap

acity

is

not a

n is

sue.

In re

ality

, any

num

ber o

f con

ditio

ns m

ight

cha

nge

betw

een

now

and

201

2 al

terin

g th

e di

rect

ion

of a

scho

ol’s

enr

ollm

ent.

Thes

e pr

ojec

tions

shou

ld b

e vi

ewed

as a

n in

dica

tor o

f wha

t mig

ht h

appe

n if

curr

ent c

ondi

tions

wer

e to

rem

ain

in p

lace

and

bui

ldin

g ca

paci

ties w

ere

not

an is

sue.

•A

s a g

ener

al ru

le sc

hool

pro

ject

ions

are

less

acc

urat

e th

an d

istri

ct le

vel

proj

ectio

ns b

ecau

se th

ey a

re b

ased

on

smal

ler n

umbe

rs w

hich

may

be

less

re

liabl

e w

hen

estim

atin

g fu

ture

enr

ollm

ents

. For

this

reas

on th

ese

num

bers

sh

ould

be

view

ed a

s ind

icat

ors o

f tre

nds (

is a

scho

ol g

oing

up,

dow

n, o

r st

ayin

g th

e sa

me)

rath

er th

an a

pre

cise

indi

cato

r of a

scho

ol’s

futu

re

enro

llmen

t.

•Th

e m

etho

dolo

gy fo

r sch

ool p

roje

ctio

ns v

arie

s fro

m d

istri

ct to

dis

trict

de

pend

ing

upon

the

cond

ition

s tha

t are

rele

vant

in e

ach

case

.

49D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Scho

ol P

roje

ctio

n M

etho

dolo

gy•

At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K, 6

, and

9) e

ach

scho

ol’s

pro

porti

on o

f the

dis

trict

en

rollm

ent (

as o

f Oct

ober

200

6) w

as u

sed

as th

e st

artin

g po

int f

or th

e pr

ojec

tion.

Thi

s per

cent

age

was

mul

tiplie

d by

the

appr

opria

te d

istri

ct g

rade

le

vel p

roje

ctio

n to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t tha

t gra

de.

The

num

ber

of st

uden

ts e

xpec

ted

from

new

hou

sing

wer

e th

en a

dded

to th

is to

tal.

•A

t the

con

tinui

ng g

rade

s the

cur

rent

pop

ulat

ion

was

rolle

d up

toth

e ne

xt

grad

e an

d th

e nu

mbe

r of s

tude

nts e

xpec

ted

from

new

hou

sing

wer

e ad

ded

to

the

tota

l.

•Th

e fin

al n

umbe

rs a

t bot

h en

try a

nd c

ontin

uing

gra

des w

ere

then

bal

ance

d to

th

e m

ediu

m d

istri

ct fo

reca

st; a

s with

the

dist

rict n

umbe

rs th

ese

num

bers

are

O

ctob

er h

eadc

ount

pro

ject

ions

.

•Th

e pr

ojec

tions

in th

is c

ase

are

heav

ily in

fluen

ced

by tw

o fa

ctor

s, ea

ch

scho

ol’s

pro

porti

on o

f the

ent

ry g

rade

enr

ollm

ent i

n 20

06 a

nd th

e am

ount

of

new

hou

sing

pla

nned

for p

artic

ular

serv

ice

area

s.

50D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

New

Sin

gle

Fam

ily H

omes

by S

ervi

ce A

rea

Dat

a fr

om N

ew H

ome

Tren

ds

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istri

ctNe

w Ho

usin

g Un

its (S

ellin

g or

Pro

pose

d fo

r Fut

ure

Cons

truct

ion

and

Sale

by

Serv

ice A

rea)

Data

from

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

Deve

lopm

ents

were

gro

uped

into

serv

icea

area

s bas

ed o

n O

nlin

e at

tend

ance

are

a m

aps f

rom

the

Mon

roe

Scho

ol D

istric

tDa

ta is

for s

ingl

e fa

mily

hom

es o

nly

Sing

le-F

amily

Type

Nam

eUn

its1

Chai

n La

ke E

lem

enta

ry28

21

Fran

k W

agne

r Ele

men

tary

01

Frye

land

s Ele

men

tary

14No

te: N

umbe

rs a

re sl

ight

ly lo

wer t

han

the

556

1M

altb

y El

emen

tary

114

uni

ts re

porte

d in

the

earli

er p

art o

f thi

s rep

ort.

The

num

bers

1M

onro

e El

emen

tary

24

repo

rted

here

refle

ct th

e la

test

upda

tes f

rom

1

Sale

m W

oods

Ele

men

tary

70

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

and

indi

cate

a c

hang

e in

50

4

the

num

ber o

f pro

pose

d un

its fo

r som

e de

velo

pmen

ts.

2Hi

dden

Riv

er M

iddl

e Sc

hool

114

2M

onro

e M

iddl

e Sc

hool

942

Park

Pla

ce M

iddl

e29

650

4

51D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

n Su

mm

ary

by S

choo

l (2

007-

2012

) 1

O

CT03

O

CT04

O

CT05

O

CT06

O

CT07

O

CT08

O

CT09

O

CT10

O

CT11

O

CT12

C

hain

Lak

e Elem

enta

ry

605

642

507

517

529

548

580

599

610

625

Fry

elan

ds E

lemen

tary

53

0 52

3 53

7 54

7 55

5 55

4 54

4 54

2 F

rank

Wag

ner E

lemen

tary

51

9 51

8 44

8 43

9 45

5 44

1 43

4 41

9 40

0 39

8 M

altby

Ele

men

tary

40

3 35

9 43

3 42

9 43

0 42

9 45

9 46

8 47

8 48

3 M

onro

e Elem

enta

ry

244

302

321

356

388

416

446

437

Sale

m W

oods

Elem

enta

ry

538

535

450

460

463

465

458

455

440

451

20

65

2054

26

12

2670

27

34

2787

28

73

2910

29

18

2937

Note

: Num

bers

may

not

add

to ex

act t

otal

s due

to ro

undi

ng

Not

e: Pr

ojec

tions

are b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icatin

g wh

ether

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay ab

out t

he sa

me,

rath

er th

an p

recis

e esti

mat

es o

f fut

ure e

nrol

lmen

ts. M

ethod

and

A

ssum

ptio

ns: A

t the

entry

gra

des (

K,6

& 9

) eac

h sc

hool

's sta

rting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be e

qual

the O

ctobe

r 200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istric

t enr

ollm

ent a

t tha

t gra

de. A

t the

cont

inui

ng

gra

des,

stude

nts a

re ro

lled

up fr

om th

e pre

viou

s gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "r

educ

tion

facto

r" is

appl

ied to

the p

roje

ction

s at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acco

unt f

or th

e gre

ater

leve

ls of

attri

btio

n

that

occu

r at t

hose

gra

des.

Once

this

initi

al en

rollm

ent p

rojec

tion

is es

tablis

hed,

addi

tiona

l stu

dent

s are

adde

d ba

sed

on th

e num

ber o

f new

hom

es ex

pecte

d in

each

serv

ice ar

ea o

ver t

he co

urse

of

the f

orec

ast (

usin

g th

e Dist

rict's

stud

ent g

ener

ation

rates

for n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome n

umbe

rs co

me f

rom

an an

alys

is of

data

from

the N

ew H

ome T

rend

s data

base

. The

fina

l num

bers

are

then

bala

nced

to th

e Dist

rict p

roje

ction

. F

or al

terna

tive s

choo

ls an

d pr

ogra

ms (

e.g.,

Sky V

alley

and

Yout

h Re

-eng

agem

ent)

it is

assu

med

that

each

scho

ol's

perc

entag

e of t

he cu

rrent

enro

llmen

t

at ea

ch g

rade

(Oct

2006

) will

rem

ain

cons

tant o

ver t

ime .

Thi

s per

cent

age i

s app

lied t

o th

e Dist

rict p

roje

ction

at ea

ch g

rade

leve

l for

each

year

of t

he fo

reca

st to

estim

ate th

e fut

ure e

nrol

lmen

t at

thes

e sch

ools.

As w

ith th

e reg

ular

scho

ols,

an ad

justm

ent f

acto

r is a

pplie

d to

bala

nce t

he n

umbe

rs to

the d

istric

t pro

jectio

n.

52D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

n Su

mm

ary

by S

choo

l (2

007-

2012

) 2

O

CT

03

OC

T04

O

CT0

5 O

CT

06

OC

T07

O

CT

08

OC

T09

O

CT

10

OC

T11

O

CT

12

FW

MS

345

347

0 0

0 0

0 0

Hid

den

Riv

er M

iddl

e Sc

hool

29

9 28

6 27

8 29

3 28

3 29

2 29

5 30

5 31

8 33

7 P

ark

Plac

e M

iddl

e 95

1 91

4 61

0 60

3 65

4 68

1 68

9 71

3 74

3 78

8 M

onro

e M

iddl

e Sc

hool

74

3 73

5 51

8 49

5 47

1 45

1 45

5 46

9 48

6 51

4

2338

22

82

1406

13

91

1408

14

23

1439

14

87

1547

16

39

Not

e: N

umbe

rs m

ay n

ot a

dd to

exa

ct to

tals

due

to r

ound

ing

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a s

choo

l is l

ikel

y to

tren

d up

, dow

n or

stay

abo

ut th

e sa

me,

rath

er th

an p

reci

se e

stim

ates

of f

utur

e en

rollm

ents

. M

etho

d an

d

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

& 9

) eac

h sc

hool

's st

artin

g en

rollm

ent i

s ass

umed

to b

e eq

ual t

he O

ctob

er 2

006

perc

enta

ge o

f the

Dis

trict

enr

ollm

ent a

t tha

t gra

de. A

t the

con

tinui

ng

gra

des,

stud

ents

are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12

to a

ccou

nt fo

r the

gre

ater

leve

ls o

f attr

ibtio

n

that

occ

ur a

t tho

se g

rade

s. O

nce

this

initi

al e

nrol

lmen

t pro

ject

ion

is e

stab

lishe

d, a

dditi

onal

stud

ents

are

add

ed b

ased

on

the n

umbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea o

ver t

he c

ours

e of

th

e fo

reca

st (u

sing

the

Dis

trict

's st

uden

t gen

erat

ion

rate

s for

new

hom

es).

The

new

hom

e nu

mbe

rs c

ome

from

an

anal

ysis

of d

ata f

rom

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e. T

he fi

nal n

umbe

rs a

re

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols

and

prog

ram

s (e

.g.,

Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at

eac

h gr

ade

(Oct

200

6) w

ill re

mai

n co

nsta

nt o

ver t

ime

. Thi

s per

cent

age

is a

pplie

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion

at e

ach

grad

e lev

el fo

r eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fore

cast

to e

stim

ate

the

futu

re e

nrol

lmen

t at

th

ese

scho

ols.

As

with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

53D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Pro

ject

ion

Sum

mar

y by

Sch

ool

(200

7-20

12)

3

OC

T03

O

CT

04

OC

T05

O

CT

06

OC

T07

O

CT

08

OC

T09

O

CT

10

OC

T11

O

CT

12

Mon

roe

Hig

h Sc

hool

12

40

1302

18

20

1794

18

25

1829

18

09

1824

17

95

1737

1240

13

02

1820

17

94

1825

18

29

1809

18

24

1795

17

37

Not

e: N

umbe

rs m

ay n

ot a

dd t

o ex

act t

otal

s du

e to

rou

ndin

g N

ote:

Pro

ject

ions

are

bes

t rea

d as

tren

ds, i

ndic

atin

g w

heth

er a

sch

ool i

s lik

ely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or s

tay

abou

t the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

A

ssum

ptio

ns: A

t the

ent

ry g

rade

s (K

,6 &

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is

assu

med

to b

e eq

ual t

he O

ctob

er 2

006

perc

enta

ge o

f the

Dis

trict

enr

ollm

ent a

t tha

t gra

de. A

t the

con

tinui

ng

gra

des,

stu

dent

s ar

e ro

lled

up fr

om th

e pr

evio

us g

rade

. At t

he h

igh

scho

ol le

vel a

"re

duct

ion

fact

or"

is a

pplie

d to

the

proj

ectio

ns a

t gra

des

11 a

nd 1

2 to

acc

ount

for

the

grea

ter l

evel

s of

attr

ibtio

n

tha

t occ

ur a

t tho

se g

rade

s. O

nce

this

initi

al e

nrol

lmen

t pro

ject

ion

is e

stab

lishe

d, a

dditi

onal

stu

dent

s ar

e ad

ded

base

d on

the

num

ber

of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea o

ver t

he c

ours

e of

t

he fo

reca

st (u

sing

the

Dis

tric

t's s

tude

nt g

ener

atio

n ra

tes

for

new

hom

es).

The

new

hom

e nu

mbe

rs c

ome

from

an

anal

ysis

of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e T

rend

s da

taba

se. T

he fi

nal n

umbe

rs a

re

the

n ba

lanc

ed to

the

Dis

tric

t pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r al

tern

ativ

e sc

hool

s an

d pr

ogra

ms

(e.g

., Sk

y V

alle

y an

d Y

outh

Re-

enga

gem

ent)

it is

ass

umed

that

eac

h sc

hool

's pe

rcen

tage

of t

he c

urre

nt e

nrol

lmen

t

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his

perc

enta

ge is

app

lied

to th

e D

istr

ict p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade l

evel

for

each

yea

r of

the

fore

cast

to e

stim

ate

the

futu

re e

nrol

lmen

t at

the

se s

choo

ls. A

s w

ith th

e re

gula

r sch

ools

, an

adju

stm

ent f

acto

r is

app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict

pro

ject

ion.

54D

emog

raph

ic T

rend

s and

Pro

ject

ions

--M

a y 2

007

Proj

ectio

n Su

mm

ary

by S

choo

l (2

007-

2012

) 4

O

CT0

3 O

CT0

4 O

CT0

5 O

CT0

6 O

CT0

7 O

CT0

8 O

CT0

9 O

CT1

0 O

CT1

1 O

CT1

2 L

eade

rs in

Lea

rnin

g 10

6 86

93

15

1 14

5 16

0 16

1 17

5 19

5 21

0 S

ped

7 13

10

10

10

11

11

12

13

14

S

ky V

alle

y Ed

ucat

ion

Cent

er

455

480

560

633

660

695

722

775

826

874

Sno

-Isle

0

0 0

0 0

0 S

umm

it Sc

hool

20

26

0

0 0

0 0

0 T

rans

. 12

15

16

0

0 0

0 0

0 Y

outh

Re-

Enga

gem

ent

80

112

120

147

136

161

148

156

176

175

68

0 73

2 79

9 94

1 95

1 10

27

1041

11

18

1210

12

74

Not

e: N

umbe

rs m

ay n

ot a

dd to

exa

ct to

tals

due

to r

ound

ing

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a s

choo

l is l

ikel

y to

tren

d up

, dow

n or

stay

abo

ut th

e sa

me,

rath

er th

an p

reci

se e

stim

ates

of f

utur

e en

rollm

ents.

Met

hod

and

A

ssum

ptio

ns: A

t the

ent

ry g

rade

s (K

,6 &

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

g

rade

s, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

appl

ied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12

to a

ccou

nt fo

r the

gre

ater

leve

ls of

attr

ibtio

n

that

occ

ur a

t tho

se g

rade

s. O

nce

this

initi

al e

nrol

lmen

t pro

ject

ion

is es

tabl

ishe

d, a

dditi

onal

stud

ents

are

adde

d ba

sed

on th

e num

ber o

f new

hom

es e

xpec

ted

in e

ach

serv

ice

area

ove

r the

cou

rse

of

the

fore

cast

(usin

g th

e D

istri

ct's

stude

nt g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fro

m a

n an

alys

is of

dat

a fro

m th

e N

ew H

ome

Tren

ds d

atab

ase.

The

fina

l num

bers

are

th

en b

alan

ced

to th

e D

istric

t pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols

and

prog

ram

s (e.

g., S

ky V

alle

y an

d Y

outh

Re-

enga

gem

ent)

it is

assu

med

that

eac

h sc

hool

's pe

rcen

tage

of t

he c

urre

nt e

nrol

lmen

t

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

appl

ied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade l

evel

for e

ach

year

of t

he fo

reca

st to

esti

mat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t th

ese

scho

ols.

As w

ith th

e re

gula

r sch

ools

, an

adju

stmen

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)1

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Cha

in L

ake

Elem

enta

ryOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

013

186

8311

710

881

8588

9296

981

123

8490

117

119

9188

9295

9910

32

125

7487

120

118

9697

9398

101

105

313

892

7412

212

591

100

101

9810

210

54

125

8788

129

127

8097

107

108

104

109

584

9590

8299

109

109

105

Totals

642

507

517

605

597

529

548

580

599

610

625

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

1 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)1

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Frye

land

s Ele

men

tary

OCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

094

8580

8282

8485

851

9996

9085

8787

8889

284

9310

094

8890

9091

382

8495

102

9589

9191

484

8488

9910

699

9294

587

8184

8798

105

9891

Totals

530

523

537

547

555

554

544

542

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

2 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)1

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Fran

k W

agne

r Ele

men

tary


010

278

6311

310

459

6161

6263

631

108

7781

8611

867

6364

6465

652

9079

8211

611

384

6965

6666

673

117

8174

106

105

8485

7066

6767

410

063

8498

106

7787

8973

6869

51

7055

8476

8688

7267

Totals

518

448

439

519

546

455

441

434

419

400

398

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

3 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)1

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Mal

tby

Elem

enta


071

6570

5575

6769

7173

7576

151

6968

8283

7572

7476

7779

277

5173

8291

7279

7578

7981

373

8152

9589

7674

8177

8081

487

7785

8910

255

7978

8681

845

9081

8656

8078

8681

Totals

359

433

429

403

440

430

429

459

468

478

483

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

4 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)1

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Mon

roe

Elem

enta


034

7564

6666

6769

691

4442

8068

6970

7172

242

4844

8370

7273

733

2742

4945

8472

7374

463

4044

5147

8874

765

3455

4044

5147

8774

Totals

244

302

321

356

388

416

446

437

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

5 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)1

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Sale

m W

oods

Ele

men

tary


010

279

5989

9564

6667

6970

711

9977

8712

488

6368

7072

7374

211

974

7896

102

9166

7174

7476

310

280

8310

612

180

9368

7375

764

113

6777

123

113

8784

9771

7678

571

7677

8784

9771

766

20

00

00

0Totals

535

450

460

538

519

463

465

458

455

440

451

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

6 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)2

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

FWM

SOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

41

00

00

00

510

710

712

20

00

00

06

108

118

112

00

00

00

713

012

011

20

00

00

08

10

00

00

0Totals

347

345

346

00

00

00

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

7 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)2

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Hid

den

Riv

er M

iddl

e Sc

hool


586

102

900

00

00

06

112

8888

9510

893

9691

103

108

108

788

107

9410

211

695

100

103

9711

111

68

8311

196

9610

110

599

112

Totals

286

278

293

299

314

283

292

295

305

318

337

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

8 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)2

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Park

Pla

ce M

iddl

eOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

620

220

521

722

421

224

125

225

47

199

213

220

233

240

228

259

272

846

720

918

547

147

521

722

423

724

423

126

39

447

480

429

00

00

00

100

00

00

011

00

00

00

120

00

00

0Totals

914

610

603

951

904

654

681

689

713

743

788

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

9 o

f 19

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)2

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Mon

roe

Mid

dle

Scho

olOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

525

124

124

90

00

00

06

238

176

137

256

234

144

148

140

158

165

165

724

516

817

824

524

214

715

415

915

017

017

78

117

418

01

418

014

815

616

115

117

1Totals

735

518

495

743

729

471

451

455

469

486

514

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

10

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)3

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Mon

roe

Hig

h Sc

hool


71

00

00

00

81

20

00

00

09

250

646

05

548

549

446

948

248

444

910

484

471

482

471

488

450

474

480

455

463

462

1144

646

345

145

438

048

245

047

448

045

446

112

369

379

401

310

311

409

411

386

407

394

365

Totals

1302

1820

1794

1240

1186

1825

1829

1809

1824

1795

1737

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

11

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)4

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Lead

ers i

n Le

arni

ngOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

81

11

11

11

92

37

124

79

911

1313

1011

628

1216

2527

3232

3945

1123

3137

3031

4238

4048

4858

1250

5378

5240

6986

7883

9393

Totals

8693

151

106

9114

516

016

117

519

521

0

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

12

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)4

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Sped


01

11

11

11

21

00

00

00

31

11

00

00

00

41

11

11

11

11

52

11

11

11

11

61

11

11

11

11

71

11

11

11

11

81

11

11

11

11

93

11

11

11

12

22

101

12

12

22

22

33

111

11

21

11

11

212

22

21

00

00

00

Totals

1310

107

710

1111

1213

14

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

13

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)4

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Sky

Val

ley

Educ

atio

n C

ente

rOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

155

6568

5743

7368

7274

7578

249

4951

5254

5660

5659

6061

343

4348

4242

5762

6661

6466

446

5348

4637

4755

6164

5963

544

5461

5030

6362

7379

8377

650

4868

4039

7175

6787

9595

741

5154

4536

5558

6154

7177

849

6160

3829

6364

6771

6382

946

4850

3328

5363

6479

9190

1024

3953

2923

4851

6061

7486

1120

2837

1516

4238

4048

4858

1213

2135

89

3138

3537

4242

Totals

480

560

633

455

386

660

695

722

775

826

874

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

14

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)4

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Sno-

Isle


100

00

00

011

00

00

00

120

00

00

0Totals

00

00

00

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

15

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)4

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Sum

mit

Scho

olOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

61

00

00

00

73

23

00

00

00

84

42

00

00

00

98

73

00

00

00

106

12

00

00

00

111

31

00

00

00

124

30

00

00

0Totals

2620

120

00

00

0

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

16

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)4

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

Tran

s.OCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

1215

1612

130

00

00

0Totals

1516

1213

00

00

00

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

17

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)4

GRADE

OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

OCT_03

OCT_02

You

th R

e-En

gage

men

tOCT_07OCT_08OCT_09OCT_10OCT_11OCT_12

1211

212

014

780

7113

616

114

815

617

617

5Totals

112

120

147

8071

136

161

148

156

176

175

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

18

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

Long

Ran

ge E

nrol

lmen

t Pro

ject

ions

by

Scho

ol (M

ediu

m P

roje

ctio

n)OCT_04OCT_05OCT_06

6370

6637

6796

OCT_03

6323

OCT_02

6161

OCT_07

6919

OCT_08

7066

OCT_09

7163

OCT_10

7338

OCT_11

7470

OCT_12

7587

Wed

nesd

ay, M

ay 0

9, 2

007

Page

19

of 1

9

Num

bers

may

not

add

to e

xact

tota

ls du

e to

roun

ding

.

Not

e: P

roje

ctio

ns a

re b

est r

ead

as tr

ends

, ind

icat

ing

whe

ther

a sc

hool

is li

kely

to tr

end

up, d

own

or st

ay a

bout

the

sam

e, ra

ther

than

pre

cise

est

imat

es o

f fut

ure

enro

llmen

ts.

Met

hod

and

Ass

umpt

ions

: At t

he e

ntry

gra

des (

K,6

9) e

ach

scho

ol's

star

ting

enro

llmen

t is a

ssum

ed to

be

equa

l the

Oct

ober

200

6 pe

rcen

tage

of t

he D

istri

ct e

nrol

lmen

t at t

hat g

rade

. At t

he c

ontin

uing

gr

ades

, stu

dent

s are

rolle

d up

from

the

prev

ious

gra

de. A

t the

hig

h sc

hool

leve

l a "

redu

ctio

n fa

ctor

" is

app

lied

to th

e pr

ojec

tions

at g

rade

s 11

and

12 to

acc

ount

for t

he g

reat

er le

vels

of

attri

btio

n th

at o

ccur

at t

hose

gra

des.

Onc

e th

is in

itial

enr

ollm

ent p

roje

ctio

n is

est

ablis

hed,

add

ition

al st

uden

ts a

re a

dded

bas

ed o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew h

omes

exp

ecte

d in

eac

h se

rvic

e ar

ea

over

the

cour

se o

f the

fore

cast

(usi

ng th

e D

istri

ct's

stud

ent g

ener

atio

n ra

tes f

or n

ew h

omes

). T

he n

ew h

ome

num

bers

com

e fr

om an

ana

lysi

s of d

ata

from

the

New

Hom

e Tr

ends

dat

abas

e.

The

final

num

bers

are

then

bal

ance

d to

the

Dis

trict

pro

ject

ion.

Fo

r alte

rnat

ive

scho

ols a

nd p

rogr

ams (

e.g.

, Sky

Val

ley

and

You

th R

e-en

gage

men

t) it

is a

ssum

ed th

at e

ach

scho

ol's

perc

enta

ge o

f the

cur

rent

enr

ollm

ent

at e

ach

grad

e (O

ct 2

006)

will

rem

ain

cons

tant

ove

r tim

e . T

his p

erce

ntag

e is

app

lied

to th

e D

istri

ct p

roje

ctio

n at

eac

h gr

ade

leve

l for

eac

h ye

ar o

f the

fo

reca

st to

est

imat

e th

e fu

ture

enr

ollm

ent a

t the

se sc

hool

s. A

s with

the

regu

lar s

choo

ls, a

n ad

just

men

t fac

tor i

s app

lied

to b

alan

ce th

e nu

mbe

rs to

the

dist

rict p

roje

ctio

n.

CHAPTER IV

WAC 392-341-025 (4) The ability of such district to provide capital funds by local effort.


4. ABILITY TO PROVIDE CAPITAL FUNDING SUPPORT Introduction The Monroe School District is currently a district that meets the statutory and fiscal requirements for eligibility to compete for state assistance for construction projects. This plan is based on the assumption that the district will continue to compete for state matching funds for new construction and if eligible, remodeling and new-in-lieu of modernization. In addition to state monies, capital projects will be financed through issuance of general obligation bonds and/or capital projects levies. Money collected through voluntary mitigation agreements and land dedicated for school sites through voluntary mitigation agreements will be included in the local share of capital projects, primarily portable purchases, portable relocation and refurbishing, and land acquisition. Bond History The Monroe School District passed a capital improvements bond for $10.8 million in 1987. Revenues from this bond were used to construct Frank Wagner Elementary, Chain Lake Elementary, additions to the now Park Place Middle School, new roofs and insulation at three schools, a playshed at Maltby Elementary, and other small projects. A bond was passed in 1996 for $24 million. It was used for the construction of a new high school and Hidden River Middle School, both of which opened in September 1999. It also funded several other minor projects. The District passed their latest bond issue in 2003 in the amount of $21,852,000. These funds were used for the construction of Fryelands Elementary, additions to Hidden River Middle School and Monroe High School, remodeling of Maltby Elementary School, new athletic facilities and technology upgrades. These projects were completed in 2005/2006.

Historical Bond Issue Results Date Total $ Request % Yes Validation Result May 2003 (classrooms, fields, tech) $21.852 M 60.29 yes passed May 2002 (schools, tech) $12.0 M 57.6 yes failed February 2002 (schools, tech) $12.0 M 56.1 yes failed April 1999 (stadium) $2.98 51.1 yes failed November 1996 Prop 2 (stadium) Prop 3 (pool) Prop 4 (auditorium) Prop 5 (cap projects)

$2.1 M $1.9 M $1.5 M $4.0 M

50.3 53.9 47.9 64.1

yes yes yes yes

failed failed failed failed

May 1996 Prop 1 (schools) Prop 2 (stadium) Prop 3 ( pool) Prop 4 (auditorium) Prop 5 (cap projects)

$24 M $2.1 M $1.9 M $1.5 M $4.0 M

70.5 55.4 57.7 53.4 64.1

yes yes yes yes yes

passed failed failed failed passed

May 1995 (schools, stadium) $38.5 M 45.1 yes failed February 1994 Prop 1 (schools) Prop 2 (upgrades)

$23.06 M $1.015 M

49.5 47.9

yes yes

failed failed

March 1993 Prop 1 (schools) Prop 2 (stadium)

$19.85 M $4.8 M

61.6 57.0

no no

failed failed

May 1991 (schools) $16.6 M 47.2 yes failed February 1991 (schools) $16.6 M 59.6 yes failed

4 01 capital funding.doc


State Match Funds State match funds come from the Common School Construction Fund. Bonds are sold on behalf of the fund then retired from revenues accruing predominantly from the sale of renewable resources (i.e. timber) from state school lands set aside by the Enabling Act of 1889. If these sources are insufficient to meet needs, the Legislature can appropriate general funds, or the State Board of Education can establish a moratorium on certain projects. School districts may qualify for state matching funds for specific capital projects based on a prioritization system. This system prioritizes allocation of available funding resources to school districts statewide based on several prioritization categories. Funds are then distributed to the districts based on a formula which calculates district assessed valuation per pupil relative to the whole state assessed valuation per pupil to establish the ratio of the total project cost to be paid by the state. State match funds can only be applied to school construction projects. Site acquisition and improvements are not eligible to receive matching funds from the state. Because availability of state match funds has not been able to keep pace with the rapid enrollment growth occurring in many of Washington’s school districts, matching funds from the state may not be received by a school district until two to three years after a school has been constructed or modernized. In such cases the District must “front fund” a project. That is, the District must finance the complete project with local funds and use the state matching share on future projects. Impact Fees Development impact fees have been adopted by a number of jurisdictions as a means of supplementing traditional funding sources for construction of public facilities needed to accommodate new development. School impact fees are generally collected by the permitting agency at the time building permits or certificate of occupancy are issued. Assessed Valuation Basic Assessed Valuation – May 31, 2007 $4,514,407,239 Five percent maximum Capital Outlay $225,720,362 Less Outstanding Bonds and Debt $35,307,079 Allowable Bonded Indebtedness $190,413,283 Refer to the following spreadsheet for detailed information related to the Debt Limit Calculations for the Monroe School District.




Six-Year Finance Plan (2007-2013) Of the approximately $225 million authorized, the remaining bonding authority of the district is $190 million. These funds will be issued as needed in compliance with the Six-Year Financial Plan for Capital Projects. The table below demonstrates how the Monroe School District intends to fund new construction and improvements to school facilities for the years 2009 through 2013. The financing components include funding through voter approved bonds and development impact fees collected under the State Growth Management Act, and state matching funds. In the event impact fees are not available for new developments due to legislative changes, bond issues placed before the electorate would have to be increased. Monroe School District anticipates qualifying for state matching funds for modernization and new construction projects.

Monroe School District Six-Year Finance Plan (2007-2013)

Estimated Project Cost by Year (in $millions)

Construction Project 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Bond/ Levy

State Match Local

Construction Projects (Growth Related) Monroe MS Replacement CLE/SWE Classroom Additions FEW Core Land Purchase Transportation COOP Construction Projects (Non-Growth Related) System Upgrades Building Purchases Technology Old Owen Site Improvements ADA, Demo, Kitchen, Bus Areas Modernize Park Place MS

21.90 4.20 3.79 1.52

27.48 3.79 1.52 1.40 4.30

5.00 4.90 3.79 4.67 1.51 4.30 20.50

5.05 4.93 3.79 4.30 20.50

4.67 4.30

49.38 4.20 10.05 4.67 9.83 15.16 4.67 4.55 1.40 17.20 41.00

30.28 2.10 5.98 4.57 0.92 15.16 4.67 4.55 1.40 17.20 41.00

19.0 1.90 3.97 8.91

0.10 0.20 0.10 0.10

Sub-Totals 31.41 38.49 44.67 38.57 6.63 162.11 127.83 33.78 0.50

Not included in the above financial spending plan is a 3% bond management and administrative budget totaling $4.86 million and an overall bond contingency of 8% which totals $13.36 million. This will be spent throughout the duration of the plan as required to cover excess inflation, bid market adjustments, and unforeseen cost expenditures.

Debt Limit Calculation WorksheetMonroe School DistrictInformation Reflects Financial Data Prior to Bond Payment on 6/1/07May 31, 2007

1. ASSESSED VALUATIONA. Assessed Valuation $4,509,473,675B. Timber Tax Roll At 100% $4,933,564C. TOTAL ASSESSED VALUATION $4,514,407,239

WITHOUT VOTE WITH VOTE CAPITAL VOTED TOTAL LIMIT2. DEBT LIMIT PERCENTAGES 0.3750% 2.1250% 2.5000% 5.0000%

3. LEGAL DEBT LIMIT $16,929,027 $95,931,154 $112,860,181 $225,720,362

4. OUTSTANDING CURRENT DEBTA. 675 Matured Bonds Payable $0 $0 $0 $0

680 Bond Service Fees Payable $0 $0 $0 $0685 Matured Bond Interest Payable $0 $0 $986,495 $986,495

B. 241 Warrants Outstanding $1,837,771 $1,837,771601 Accounts Payable $0 $0602 Contracts Payable-Current $0 $0604 Accrued Interest Payable $0 $0605 Accrued Salaries $0 $0606 Revenue Anticipation Notes Payable $0 $0610 Payroll Deductions and Taxes Payable $0 $0635 Deferred Compensation Payable $0 $0637 Est. Unemployment Benefits Payable $0 $0638 Est Other Employee Benefits Payable $0 $0639 Est Industrial Insur Benefits Payable $0 $0650 Deposits $0 $0685 Arbitrage Rebate Payable $0 $0750 Deferred Revenue $21,725 $21,725

C. TOTAL OUTSTANDING CURRENT DEBT $1,859,496 $0 $986,495 $2,845,991

5. CASH, SECURITIES, RECEIVABLESA. 240 Cash on Deposit with County Treasurer-DSF $0 $553,580 $553,580

250 Cash with Fiscal Agent (DSF) $0 $0 $0450 Investments (DSF) $0 $2,483,835 $2,483,835

B. 200 Imprest Cash - GF, CPF, TVF $14,400 $14,400230 Cash on Hand - GF, CPF, TVF $0 $0240 Cash on Dep w/ County Treas-GF, CPF, TVF $1,938,210 $1,938,210330 Due From Other Gov't Units - GF, CPF, TVF $0 $0340 Accounts Receivable - GF, CPF, TVF $0 $0450 Investments - GF, CPF, TVF $2,918,877 $2,918,877455 Investments-Def Comp - GF, CPF, TVF $0 $0459 Self Insurance Deposits - GF, CPF, TVF $0 $0

C. TOTAL CASH, SECURITIES, & RECEIVABLES $4,871,487 $0 $3,037,415 $7,908,901

D. APPLIED TO CURRENT DEBT $1,859,496 $0 $986,495 $2,845,991

6. NET OUTSTANDING CURRENT DEBT $0 $0 $0 $0

7. LONG-TERM DEBTA. 690 Bonds Payable-Long Term $0 $0 $42,520,000 $42,520,000B. 603 Contracts Payable-Long Term $609,802 $609,802

607 Vacation Leave Payable $380,000 $380,000608 Sick Leave Payable $782,000 $782,000

C. LONG TERM DEBT $1,771,802 $0 $42,520,000 $44,291,802

Debt Limit Calculation WorksheetMonroe School DistrictInformation Reflects Financial Data Prior to Bond Payment on 6/1/07May 31, 2007DEBT LIMIT CALCULATION

8. CASH SECURITIES, RECEIVABLESA. 890 Unreserved Fund Balance $0 $3,037,415 $3,037,415B. Net Cash, Securities, Receivables (5c-5d) $3,011,990 $0 $2,050,920 $5,062,910C. 830 Reserved For Debt Service $0 $1,949,771

D. Smaller of two amounts, a,b, or c $0 $0 $2,050,920 $2,050,920

9. NET OUTSTANDING LONG-TERM DEBTLong-Term Debt less Net Cash (7c-8d) $1,771,802 $0 $40,469,080 $42,240,882

10. NET OUTSTANDING DEBTShort-term plust Long-Term (6+9) $1,771,802 $0 $40,469,080 $42,240,882

11. UNCOLLECTED TAXES310 Taxes Receivable $4,587,175 $0 $2,346,628 $6,933,803

12. DEBT MARGIN AVAILABLEDebt Limit - O/S Debt + Taxes (3-10+11) $19,744,400 $95,931,154 $74,737,729 $190,413,283

Debt Limit Calculation WorksheetMonroe School DistrictInformation Reflects Financial Data Prior to Bond Payment on 6/1/07May 31, 2007SUMMARY FOR REPORTING PURPOSTS

ASSESSSED VALUATION $4,514,407,239

WITHOUT VOTE WITH VOTE CAPITAL VOTED TOTAL LIMIT0.3750% 2.1250% 2.5000% 5.0000%

LEGAL DEBT LIMIT $16,929,027 $95,931,154 $112,860,181 $225,720,362

NET OUTSTANDING DEBT $1,771,802 $0 $40,469,080 $42,240,882

UNCOLLECTED TAXES $4,587,175 $0 $2,346,628 $6,933,803

DEBT MARGIN AVAILABLE $19,744,400 $95,931,154 $74,737,729 $190,413,283

CHAPTER V

WAC 392-341-025 (5) The existence of a school housing emergency.


5 01 Housing Emergency.doc

5. EXISTENCE OF A HOUSING EMERGENCY Because the Monroe School District currently has available bonding capacity, no housing emergency exists per the definition contained in WAC 392-343-115. None of the district’s schools have been damaged from catastrophes or natural disasters such as fires, earthquakes, wind damage or other related structural failures. All of the district’s current permanent and temporary facilities are fully operable.

CHAPTER VI

WAC 392-341-025 (6) The need to improve racial balance and/or avoid creation or aggravation of racial imbalance.


6. RACIAL BALANCE OR IMBALANCE The Monroe School District has long been committed to a policy of non-discrimination for all students and employees. The district’s Long-Range Facilities Plan will not adversely impact the racial balance within the district. Included in this chapter is a table identifying the October 1, 2007 enrollment at each school, the number of African-American, Asian, Native Americans, Hispanic and Caucasian students.

RA

CIA

L B

ALA

NC

EM

onro

e S

choo

l Dis

trict

As

of O

ctob

er 1

, 200

7

Afr

ican

-Am

eric

an

Per

cent

of

Tota

l S

choo

lA

sian

Per

cent

of

Tota

l S

choo

lN

ativ

e A

mer

ican

Per

cent

of

Tota

l S

choo

lH

ispa

nic

Per

cent

of

Tota

l S

choo

lH

awai

ian

or P

acifi

c Is

land

er

Per

cent

of

Tota

l S

choo

lM

ultir

acia

l

Per

cent

of

Tota

l S

choo

lC

auca

sian

Per

cent

of

Tota

l Sch

ool

Tota

l S

choo

l E

nrol

lmen

tSc

hool

Mal

eFe

mal

eTo

tal

Enr

ollm

ent

Mal

eFe

mal

eTo

tal

Enr

ollm

ent

Mal

eFe

mal

eTo

tal

Enr

ollm

ent

Mal

eFe

mal

eTo

tal

Enr

ollm

ent

Mal

eFe

mal

eTo

tal

Enr

ollm

ent

Mal

eFe

mal

eTo

tal

Enr

ollm

ent

Mal

eFe

mal

eTo

tal

Enr

ollm

ent

Cha

in L

ake

Ele

men

tary

21

30.

58%

147

214.

06%

43

71.

35%

1010

203.

87%

02

20.

39%

712

193.

68%

228

217

445

86.0

7%51

7Fr

ank

Wag

ner E

lem

enta

ry2

68

1.81

%8

412

2.72

%3

25

1.13

%77

9517

239

.00%

31

40.

91%

1011

214.

76%

114

105

219

49.6

6%44

1Fr

yela

nds

Ele

men

tary

34

71.

34%

1213

254.

78%

41

50.

96%

4139

8015

.30%

03

30.

57%

510

152.

87%

198

190

388

74.1

9%52

3M

altb

y E

lem

enta

ry1

23

0.70

%8

917

3.97

%2

24

0.93

%17

1128

6.54

%1

12

0.47

%4

59

2.10

%17

618

936

585

.28%

428

Mon

roe

Ele

men

tary

43

72.

33%

10

10.

33%

02

20.

66%

2953

8227

.24%

00

00.

00%

94

134.

32%

111

8519

665

.12%

301

Sal

em W

oods

Ele

men

tary

05

51.

09%

510

153.

26%

63

91.

96%

1910

296.

30%

01

10.

22%

51

61.

30%

195

200

395

85.8

7%46

0To

tal E

lem

enta

ry12

2133

1.24

%48

4391

3.41

%19

1332

1.20

%19

321

841

115

.39%

48

120.

45%

4043

833.

11%

1022

986

2008

75.2

1%26

70

Hid

den

Riv

er M

iddl

e S

choo

l2

02

0.68

%5

813

4.44

%2

13

1.02

%10

414

4.78

%0

00

0.00

%2

13

1.02

%12

912

925

888

.05%

293

Mon

roe

Mid

dle

Sch

ool

43

71.

43%

98

173.

47%

53

81.

63%

2527

5210

.61%

10

10.

20%

10

10.

20%

209

195

404

82.4

5%49

0P

ark

Pla

ce M

iddl

e S

choo

l1

78

1.33

%11

617

2.82

%6

17

1.16

%64

6512

921

.39%

00

00.

00%

20

20.

33%

217

223

440

72.9

7%60

3To

tal M

iddl

e Sc

hool

710

171.

23%

2522

473.

39%

135

181.

30%

9996

195

14.0

7%1

01

0.07

%5

16

0.43

%55

554

711

0279

.51%

1386

Mon

roe

Hig

h S

choo

l6

612

0.66

%31

3364

3.51

%16

723

1.26

%92

8517

79.

70%

02

20.

11%

27

90.

49%

768

769

1537

84.2

7%18

24To

tal H

igh

Scho

ol6

612

0.66

%31

3364

3.51

%16

723

1.26

%92

8517

79.

70%

02

20.

11%

27

90.

49%

768

769

1537

84.2

7%18

24

Lead

ers

in L

earn

ing

01

10.

64%

12

31.

91%

13

42.

55%

64

106.

37%

11

21.

27%

20

21.

27%

6174

135

85.9

9%15

7S

ky V

alle

y E

duca

tion

Cen

ter

13

40.

63%

26

81.

26%

34

71.

11%

1212

243.

79%

00

00.

00%

57

121.

90%

271

307

578

91.3

1%63

3O

ut o

f Dis

trict

Spe

cial

Ed

00

00.

00%

00

00.

00%

00

00.

00%

00

00.

00%

00

00.

00%

00

00.

00%

114

1510

0.00

%15

Mon

roe

Spe

cial

Ed

Pre

scho

ol0

00

0.00

%0

22

4.44

%0

00

0.00

%4

15

11.1

1%0

00

0.00

%0

00

0.00

%30

838

84.4

4%45

Tota

l Oth

ers

14

50.

59%

310

131.

53%

47

111.

29%

2217

394.

59%

11

20.

24%

77

141.

65%

373

393

766

90.1

2%85

0

Dis

tric

t Tot

als

2537

621.

04%

104

9820

23.

44%

4825

731.

25%

384

399

783

13.0

6%5

1015

0.21

%47

5198

1.34

%23

4523

0246

4779

.66%

6730

6 02

Rac

ial B

alan

ce.x

ls

CHAPTER VII

WAC 392-341-025 (7) The type and extent of new and/or additions to existing school facilities required, and the urgency of need for such facilities.


7. NEW AND ADDITIONS TO EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITIES AND THE URGENCY OF NEED FOR SUCH FACILITIES

ild classrooms and e forecast suggests dents, and 600 high ections, Prepared by 012 to 2020 than is

2012 based on the projections outlined in the tables below. The net result of this obs onroe School District will see continued growth (especially toward the north end of the Dist for two future elementary school sites to accommodate projected growth over the next 10-12 years. The District is in progress of obtaining one such

identify the projected housed/un-housed student population for each school and respective grad d for 2012. Over the next 6 years Monroe School District will incur approximately

roe area indicating a need for additional classroom entary school sites

which a to provide a net gain of 16 additional classrooms. These additions are estimated to ed. The excess capacity over the projected 2012

un-hou teriorating portables which a

ached site plans for

y require extensive . See attached site

er Elementary Campus (demolish 4 classroom annex at Frank Wagner Elementary East). The District owns a large contiguous piece of property which is currently occupied by Frank Wagner Elementary East, Frank Wagner Elementary West and District Maintenance Offices. The Maintenance Offices are located in an old deteriorating building which if removed will open up the site and allow for a number of options to add classrooms and other program support areas which may serve both schools. Providing additional classrooms to this site should take into consideration the poor quality of the four classroom annex at Frank Wagner Elementary East. Therefore adding additional classrooms should take into account that four existing classrooms should be demolished. See attached site plan which indicates possible new building location, bus loading/unloading expansion and parking expansions.

New Elementary Sites

As student enrollment continues to climb, Monroe School District must continue to buschool facilities in order to serve current and future students of the District. The long rangthat the District could see an additional 1,000 elementary students, 500 middle school stuschool students by 2020 (Monroe School District Enrollment, Demographic Trends and ProjWilliam L. (“Les”) Kendrick, May 2007). This indicates a higher percentage of growth from 2predicted for 2007 to

ervation is the Mrict) and should plan to obtain developable property

site off of Old Owen Road. Urgency of Need

1. Purchase two elementary sites in the North end of the District. Classroom Additions at Existing Sites

The tables belowe band as forecaste

-hou257 un sed elementary school students in the Monfacilities. The District has identified possible classroom additions at three existing elem

re anticipated provide additional capacity for 384 students when complet

sed enrollment amount could be used to eliminate one or two of the old and dere now in use.

Urgency of Need 2. Classroom addition to Chain Lake Elementary School.

Add a four classroom addition to the existing campus style facility. See attlocation options.

3. Classroom addition to Salem Woods Elementary School. Add a four classroom addition to the existing school. Increased enrollment masanitary waste system which is currently routed to a holding tank and pumpedplan for potential location options.

4. Twelve classroom addition at the Frank Wagn

7 01 Urgency of Need.doc 1


nta o – AEleme ry Scho l Capacity Monroe rea

School

Educational Program Capacity

Oct. 1, 2007 Enrollment

2007 Unh d ouse

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010 rollment

Projected 2012

En2012 Projected

Enrollment Unhoused CLE 492 522 8 599 625 133 30 54FWE 272 340 6 416 437 165 68 35FWW 468 414 419 398 (70) (54) 441 FRE 496 503 7 547 554 542 46 SWE 468 478 10 465 455 451 (17) Totals 2,196 2,257 61 2,357 2,443 2,453 257

Elementary hool C y – M Area Sc apacit altby

School



2007 Unhoused

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010

Enrollment

Projected 2012

2012 Projected

Enrollment Unhoused MB ) 429 468 483 (81) E 564 418 (146Totals 564 418 (146) 429 468 483 (81)

* Monroe schools and Maltbervice. C

Po es

y sch ave b t is ogr related to bussing and student s ap o in rat

* are in p t* Refer to Chapter 1 for expanded program cap

mentary hool C y – En e Distri

ools hschools with pro m ca

een separa ed due to dhould be evaion.

tance in geluated sepa

aphic areaely. acity related t

not ded each area sacity culartabl inclu gra cal

acity calculations. Ele Sc apacit tir ct

School



2007 Unh d ouse

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010

Enrollment

Projected 2012 2012 Projected

Enrollment Unhoused CLE 492 522 30 548 599 625 133 FWE 272 340 68 356 416 437 165 FWW 468 414 (54) 441 419 398 (70) FRE 496 503 7 547 554 542 46 MBE 564 418 (146) 429 468 483 (81) SWE 468 478 10 465 455 451 (17) Totals 2,760 2,675 (85) 2,786 2,911 2,936 176

middle schools an les bel ge at add al capa ill not be necessary for e grad ls ove next si rs. T ger-r enro t forec uggests that by 2020,

significant growth is expected to occur within these upper grade levels. Future planning should be done to ed expansion of these facilities does not appear necessary at this time.

S ap on

The d high school tab ow sug st th ition city wthes e leve r the x yea he lon ange llmen ast s

account for this growth but plann

Middle chool C acity – M roe Area

School



2 007 Unhoused

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010

Enrollment


Enrollment Unhoused MNM 655 498 (157) 451 469 514 (141) PPM 935 577 (358) 681 713 788 (147) Totals 1,590 1,075 (515) 1,132 1,182 1,302 (288)

Middle School Capacity – Maltby Area

School



2007 Unhoused

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010

Enrollment


Enrollment Unhoused HRM 442 289 (153) 292 305 337 (105) Totals 442 289 (153) 292 305 337 (105)




eparated due to distance in geographic area related to bussing and student rea should be evaluated separately.

rogram capacity calculation. d program c cu

S ap ti t

* Monroe schools and Maltby schools have been sservice. Capacity related to schools within each a

* Portables are not included in p* apter 1 for expande Refer to Ch

chool C

apacity cal lations.

Middle acity – En re Distric

School



2 007 Un d house

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010

Enrollment

Projected 2012

Enrollment

2012 Projected Unhoused

HRM 442 289 (153) 292 305 337 (105) MNM 655 498 (157) 451 469 514 (141) PPM 935 577 (358) 681 713 788 (147) Totals 2,032 1,364 (668) 1,424 1,487 1,639 (393)

High Scho pacityol Ca

School



2007 Unhoused

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010

Enrollment

Projected 2012

Enrollment


MHS 1,718 1794 76 1,829 1,824 1,737 19 Leaders 182 191 95 183 1 9 195 1Totals 1,900 1985 85 2,024 2,019 1,920 20

* Portables are no program capacit ulation.* Refer to Chapter 1 for expanded program cap calcula

Sky Valley Education Center

t included in y calc acity tions.

School



2007 Unhoused

Projected 2008

Enrollment

Projected 2010

Enrollment

Projected 2012

Enrollment


SVEC* 613 713 100 695 775 874 261 Totals 613 713 100 695 775 874 261

* Fluctuations on campus headcount due to program It should be noted that the State (OSPI) calculates school capacity by dividing gross square footage of a building by a standard square footage per student (i.e. 90 square feet per kindergarten through sixth grade student, 117 square feet per grade seven and grade eight student, 130 square feet per grade nine through grade twelve student, and 144 square feet per handicapped student). This method is used by the State as a simple approach to determining school capacity for purposes of allocating available State Match Funds to school districts for new school construction. However, this method is not an accurate reflection of the actual capacity required to accommodate the adopted educational program of each district. The projections above are based on Monroe School District’s educational program capacity forecasts.

CHAPTER VIII

WAC 392-341-025 (8) A cost/benefit analysis on the need to modernize and/or replace existing school facilities in order to meet the current educational needs and the current state building code.


8 01 Mod-Replacement.doc 1

8. COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR MODERNIZATION OR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SCHOOL

FACILITIES Introduction The Capital Facilities Plan Developed by the Monroe School District is a six-year rolling-plan that is intended to be reviewed and revised each year for the succeeding six years. It provides an intermediate time frame perspective for capital facility decisions. Of the listed potential modernization or replacement projects, one of the District’s facilities is scheduled for replacement. Another project is scheduled for a modernization. Monroe Middle School

Determination for Replacement The District’s decision to replace Monroe Middle School is premised on deficiencies and special factors. The Monroe Middle School was built as a replacement for the original Monroe High School, which was mostly torn down at this site after the 1965 earthquake. The school was rebuilt at the original site and utilizes buildings that were part of the original school. The oldest building on site is the Vocational Building originally constructed in 1954. Other buildings were added in 1964, 1967, 1980 and 1990. This current campus-style school has surpassed its useful life and is in need of a great deal of facility and programmatic improvements. The facility is deteriorating at a rate which exceeds that of normal maintenance efforts and funding. In addition, the architecture restricts flexibility and reconfiguration of educational spaces thereby rendering them programmatically obsolete. The school is a candidate for a full modernization but studies have shown this may not be the best financially viable option based on cost and location of enrollment growth within the District. Full modernization of this facility is expected to reach 85% of the replacement cost, therefore replacement of this facility is recommended. Of the five buildings on campus, only the Gym/Cafeteria Building and the General Office Building is believed to be worth renovating. The other three buildings are recommended to be replaced due to age, deteriorating conditions, and restricted flexibility to reconfigure spaces to meet current educational needs. With the recommended replacement of the three buildings, it is possible that the General Office Building may also need to be replaced due to its central location on the small site which restricts potential design and relationship options. Three options for replacement were presented in a supplementary feasibility study (See report enclosed at the end of this Section). In summary, each option proposes advantages and challenges but all options focus on providing a quality facility conducive to middle school education. Depending on the option selected, the project cost for replacement of this facility with one of the same size is expected to range from $45 to $51.8 million. Option -1: Renovation and Partial Replacement of Existing Facility Modernization of the existing Monroe Middle School to meet current program standards will require extensive renovation of some of the existing buildings and full replacement of others. A project such as this must be evaluated and designed in a comprehensive manner to allow phasing and temporary accommodations to allow continued operation of the school. The complexity will add costs due to an extended construction timeline and accommodations for temporary housing and services to keep the facility operational.

To establish a preliminary cost opinion we have graphically depicted two design schemes (included in the Appendix as Attachment C & D of the report that follows) which indicate replacement and renovation of existing buildings. Utilizing Attachment D as the most comprehensive approach to achieving a quality facility, we assume the parking will be expanded and all buildings will be replaced except for the Gym/Cafeteria Building which is proposed in this scheme to be modernized.



Estimated cost for renovation and partial replacement of Monroe Middle School (delivery in 2011): New replacement building 51,320 s.f. x $368 = $18,885,760 Renovation of Gym/Cafeteria 33,677 s.f. x $275 = $9,261,175 Temporary accommodations, demolition, phasing $3,000,000 Total Estimated Construction Budget $31,146,935 Soft Costs @ 30% $ 9,344,081 Subtotal $40,491,016 Bond Management/Administration (3%) $ 1,214,730 Subtotal $41,705,746 Project Contingency (8%) $ 3,336,460

Total Estimated Project Budget $45,042,206

Option 2 – New Middle School on Auxiliary Athletic Complex Property or other District Owned Site This option explores the possibility of constructing a new middle school on the Auxiliary Athletic Complex Property located west of the existing Monroe Middle School directly across Kelsey Street. The property currently contains the former high school football and track facility and is adjacent to the current District baseball and softball competition fields. Both sites total almost 12 acres. If the existing baseball and softball practice fields at Monroe High School were developed into competition fields, the District would have the full 12 acres to develop as a potential new middle school site. Considering a new 2-story middle school and associated parking located where the existing baseball/softball fields are and the track and football field reconditioned, this site is a viable option for a new middle school facility. Positive Features:

" Development of existing Monroe School District property. " New replacement project can be constructed without disruption of Monroe Middle School program. " Site is flat and has a high percentage of useable area. " Football field and track needs only minor improvements

Negative Features:

" Close location to Park Place Middle School and not in an area of the district which is experiencing growth.

" Limited site area will not allow baseball or softball fields unless these facilities are developed on the existing Monroe Middle School site once the new replacement school is constructed.

Cost:

Estimated project cost for new middle school on the Auxiliary Athletic Complex property:

New Middle School 85,000 s.f. x $368 = $31,280,000 MHS Competition Fields $2,160,000 Demolition of MMS and development of grass playfields to serve new facility $2,430,000

Total Estimated Construction Budget $35,870,000 Soft Costs @ 30% $10,761,000 Subtotal $46,631,000 Bond Management/Administration (3%) $ 1,398,930 Subtotal $48,029,930 Project Contingency (8%) $ 3,842,395




Option 3 – New Middle School on Chain Lake Property The District owns approximately 14 acres of undeveloped land within a contiguous parcel shared by Chain Lake Elementary School. Of the 14 undeveloped acres, approximately 40 percent is encumbered by critical areas (wetland & buffer). The other obstacle to development of this site is that it is currently outside the Urban Growth Area (UGA) and Snohomish County has a policy of prohibiting the extension of sewer service outside of the designated UGA. Chain Lake Elementary currently pumps sewage from a holding tank, a new middle school will likely need to do the same until such time as this area is adopted into the UGA.

As shown on Attachment E in the Appendix of the report that follows, there appears to be inadequate room to develop a new middle school and associated parking, fields, and stormwater detention on the undeveloped southeast portion of the existing site. The undeveloped portion of the site can accommodate a middle school and parking but unless the District pursues purchase of adjacent property, playfield use would need to be shared with the elementary school. Combined use of the small playfield area is not a desirable alternative. Positive Features:

" Development of existing Monroe School District property. " Middle School located in an area of student population growth.

Negative Features:

" Sewer not available. Must pump from a holding tank. " Limited sports field area. Must purchase additional property or share with Chain Lake Elementary.

Cost: Estimated project cost for new middle school on Chain Lake Property (without sports fields):

New Middle School 85,000 sf x $368 = $31,280,000 Allowance for conversion of existing MMS into other use $3,250,000

Total Estimated Construction Budget $34,530,000 Soft Costs @ 30% $10,359,000 Subtotal $44,889,000 Bond Management/Administration (3%) $ 1,346,670 Subtotal $46,235,670 Project Contingency (8%) $ 3,698,854




Park Place Middle School

Determination for Renovation Park Place Middle School is a prime candidate for renovation and upgrades. It is located in a prime location to serve the community of Monroe and occupies a sufficiently sized 19.4-acre site. The campus facility is in fair condition relative to its past 33 years of use. It is believed that Monroe School District will benefit by investing funds to extend the life of this facility.

The following categories were developed for use by the Monroe School District in evaluation of several options related to the scope of work for Park Place Middle School. Repair of deteriorated finishes, replacement of failing mechanical and electrical systems, and structural life-safety corrections should be implemented at a minimum. These items are included under the Priority 1 Recommendations. Priority 2 Recommendations expand the scope to include program enhancements and functional relationships that are intended to make the school function better educationally. Finally, Priority 3 Recommendations include exterior building improvements which would offer such things as increased natural lighting into educational spaces, a clear and identifiable main entry, over-framing of the existing low sloped roof to provide scale, interest, and an aesthetic component to the campus while at the same time providing a functional element for enclosing and routing of mechanical and electrical systems thereby reducing future maintenance burdens. The cost opinions that follow are provided to assist the District in establishing a financially viable scope of modernization for this facility.

Recommendations – Priority 1 The Priority 1 recommendations suggest correction of observed life safety issues and scope of improvements focused on extending the facilities functional life. This includes seismic and structural upgrades and replacement of mechanical and electrical systems that are likely to fail and need replacement in the immediate future. This category also includes technology infrastructure improvements and a minimum amount of miscellaneous architectural improvements related to replacement of finishes and maintenance driven items. This proposed scope of work is intended to extend the life of the facility for another 30 years but only includes minimal improvements to the programmatic and educational aspect of the facility.

Seismic & Structural Upgrades Structural Improvements including patching 109,912 s.f. x $20.00 = $ 2,198,240 General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 175,859 Subtotal Structural Upgrades $2,374,099 Site Improvements Demo, Earthwork, Allowance $ 485,000 Landscaping Allowance $ 65,000 Curbs, Sidewalks & Paving Allowance $ 485,000 Site Utilities – Power, water, gas Allowance $ 405,000 Storm Drainage, Water Quality Allowance $ 390,000 Site Lighting Allowance $ 48,000 Misc. Site Amenities Allowance $ 240,000 General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 169,440 Subtotal Site Improvements $2,287,440 Interior Finishes Upgrades Demolition Allowance $ 100,000 Flooring Allowance $ 240,000 Casework Allowance $ 430,000 Interior Painting, Wallcovering Allowance $ 189,000 Walls Allowance $ 243,000 Ceilings Allowance $ 265,000 Wood & HM Doors Allowance $ 125,000 Door Hardware Allowance $ 140,000 General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 138,560 Subtotal Interior Finishes $1,870,560



Mechanical Systems Replacement Mobilization, permits, submittals 109,912 s.f. x $ .45 = $ 49,460 Demolition 89,290 s.f. x $ .30 = $ 26,787 HVAC Replacement (except Bldg. F& E 89,290 s.f x $48.00 = $4,285,920 Plumbing (all piping & 75% of fixtures) 89,290 s.f. x $12.25 = $1,093,803 Controls at Bldg. F (excluded above) 20,622 s.f. x $ 5.50 = $ 113,421 Fire Sprinklers 109,912 s.f. x $ 3.40 = $ 373,701 General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 475,447 Subtotal Mechanical $6,418,539 Electrical Systems Replacement Mobilization, permits, submittals 109,912 s.f. x $ .45 = $ 49,460 Demolition 89,290 s.f. x $ .30 = $ 26,787 Power 89,290 s.f x $14.60 = $1,303,634 Lighting 89,290 s.f. x $ 7.80 = $ 696,462 Low Voltage 109,912 s.f. x $ 7.60 = $ 835,331 General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 232,934 Subtotal Electrical $3,144,608

Priority 1 - Total Estimated Construction Cost $16,095,246 Soft Costs @30% $4,828,574

Subtotal $20,923,820 Bond Management & Administration @ 3% $627,715

Subtotal $21,551,535 Project Contingency @ 8% $1,724,123

Total Estimated Project Cost for Priority 1 $23,275,658

The total estimated project amount for Priority 1 equals approximately 40% of the replacement cost.

Priority 2 – Programmatic Enhancements Of high importance to the overall education of the students, is the evaluation of programmatic issues related to classroom arrangement, functional relationships and provision of proper educational delivery tools. This involves further research and involvement of staff and community to determine prioritization of such things as new computer labs, enhancement of the commons/cafeteria, general office reconfiguration, science classroom upgrades, and other required programmatic changes.

It is recommended that the District consider reconfiguration and upgrades of educational spaces to bring this facility up to current middle school standards. Budgeting for programmatic enhancements is not as precise as the preceding category dealing with identifiable life safety and system replacement items. There are numerous elective possibilities that require study and input. Program deficiencies, options, improvements, and possibilities are typically addressed as part of an architectural programming exercise produced by committee effort. As such, we can only provide a reasonable budget to work with and task a planning committee with prioritization of items to fit within the selected budget. Experience has proven that significant programmatic upgrades can be added to the project with an additional 15% of the project replacement cost added to the scope of work identified in Priority 1. This recommends adding another $8,773,816 to the project to accomplish Priority 2.

Estimated budget to accomplish Priority 2 adds - $8,773,816.



Priority 3 – Architectural Enhancements Utilizing a similar philosophy for budgeting architectural enhancements for such things as a new entry, sloped roof, new window configuration, covered playshed, or a multitude of other options which will add to the function and overall character of the facility we will again suggest a budget to work with during development of the project’s priorities. We believe that investing up to 70% of the buildings replacement cost into extension of its life is a reasonable and prudent investment. This would provide the District, students and a community with a “like-new” facility and save 30% of the cost of a new facility. Adding the described architectural enhancements to the project will increase the recommended project budget another 15% as follows:

Estimated budget to accomplish Priority 3 adds - $8,895,000

It is evident that the existing facility is in need of renovation and upgrades. Maintenance efforts and dollars will continue to be spent on this facility in increasing amounts every year. The instructional quality will continue to be limited by the environment in which it is delivered. Existing life safety issues, energy inefficiencies, and code issues will continue to exist until significant action is taken to correct these deficiencies. To assist the District with the determination of the scope of work required at this facility recommendations are divided into three categories and an appropriate budget for each was established as summarized below:

Priority 1 – Life Safety & Systems Replacements $23.3 million Priority 2 – Programmatic Enhancements $ 8.8 million Priority 3 – Architectural Enhancements $ 8.9 million

Total Modernization Budget $41.0 million

2007 Facilities Assessment Monroe Middle School

September 2007

Compiled by Hutteball & Oremus Architecture

Table of Contents

1.0 Executive Summary1.1 Introduction1.2 Methodology1.3 Summary of Conclusions

2.0 Background2.1 Overview of Monroe School District2.2 Middle School Enrollment2.3 Middle School Capacity2.4 Middle School Program Assessment

3.0 Project Description3.1 Location3.2 Construction History

4.0 Site Improvements4.1 Site Description4.2 Site Elements

5.0 Facility Description5.1 Architectural5.1.1 General5.1.2 Classroom/Library Building5.1.3 Science Building5.1.4 Gym/Cafeteria Building5.1.5 Vocational Building5.1.6 Administration Building

6.0 Engineering Requirements6.1 Structural Engineering Requirements6.2 Mechanical Engineering Requirements6.3 Electrical Engineering Requirements

7.0 Summary of Observations & Recommendations

8.0 Cost Opinions/Options8.1 Replacement Cost8.2 Option 1 – Renovation and Partial Replacement of Existing Facility8.3 Option 2 – New Middle School on Auxiliary Athletic Complex Property8.4 Option 3 – New Middle School on Chain Lake Property

9.0 Conclusion

Appendix Attachments A - E Table of Contents


Monroe Middle School Facility Assessment

Hutteball & Oremus Architecture

1.0 Executive Summary

1.1 Introduction

This Facility Assessment Report details the current condition of Monroe Middle School relative to current codes, building systems and materials, and the ability of site and buildings to accommodate the District’s middle school edu-cational program. The existing buildings are in critical need of structural seismic upgrades, life safety improvements, and overall renovation. The level of deterioration at this facility is the most severe of any school within the District. Monroe Middle School is deteriorating at a rate which exceeds that of normal maintenance efforts and funding. In addition, arrangement of the existing educational spaces and the associated structural components of the original construction restrict flexibility and reconfiguration of educational spaces thereby rendering them programmatically obsolete.

It is evident that this facility needs extensive improvements in order to continue to serve the students and community of Monroe School District. The focus of this study is to evaluate the financial viability of a full modernization to the existing facility or if a replacement (new facility) will best serve the future interests of the Monroe School District.

1.2 Methodology

Hutteball & Oremus Architecture, Inc., along with Coughlin Porter Lundeen, structural engineers, and Hargis Engi-neers, mechanical and electrical engineers were asked by Monroe School District to evaluate the existing conditions of Monroe Middle School. This investigation involved the following components of work:

> Review of the existing facility and current Capital Facilities Plan.> Analysis of program accommodations for middle school grade band.> Assessment of engineering systems for civil, structural, mechanical and electrical.> Review of available drawings.> Study of alternative building locations and additions.> Review of enrollment growth projections.> Development of cost analysis options.

1.3 Summary of Conclusions

Upon completion of the building assessment process, three options were explored. Option 1 was a partial replace-ment and modernization of the school on its existing site at a recommended probable project budget of $45,042,206. Option 2 was to relocate the school to the Auxiliary Athletic Complex Property across the street and upgrade the baseball and softball fields at the Monroe High School to competition fields at a recommended probable construction budget of $51,872,325. Option 3 was to replace the school with a new school on the Chain Lake Property or other District-owned site at a recommended probable project budget of $49,934,524. Each option proposes advantages and challenges as further described within this report, but all options focus on providing a quality facility conducive to middle school education.

Executive Summary 1




2.0 Background

2.1 Overview of Monroe School District Monroe School District is uniquely located in the southeastern portion of Snohomish County and covers approximate-ly 82 square miles. The Skykomish and Snoqualmie Rivers join to form the Snohomish River in the center of the Dis-trict. The topography includes flood plains to rolling hills. The major east-west road is U.S. Highway 2, leading from Everett to Stevens Pass and Eastern Washington. The major link to Bothell, Seattle, and the east side of the County is SR-522, leading from Monroe to Woodinville. SR-203 is a major traffic link between Monroe, Duvall, Carnation and the Redmond/Bellevue areas.

The District currently serves a student population of 6,795 (October 1, 2006) with six elementary schools, three middle schools, and one high school. “Leaders in Learning”, an individualized secondary program, is also offered in a facility owned by the District but not located in an existing school. Sky Valley Education Center, an individualized program for students in grades K-12 who otherwise would be home schooled, is housed in leased facilities. Summit School is a cooperative program with Snohomish and Sultan School Districts to offer a highly specialized program for students in grades 7-12 and is also housed in leased facilities. Sky Valley Education Center, Summit School and Leaders in Learning student enrollment figures are included in both the District and OSPI figures.

Elementary schools provide educational programs for students in kindergarten through grade five. Middle schools serve grades six through eight and the high school, grades nine through twelve. Leaders in Learning serve grades nine through twelve.

2.2 Middle School Enrollment

A significant issue faces the Monroe School District in terms of providing classroom capacity to accommodate pro-jected enrollment demands due to the rate of student growth. Enrollment projections for the District indicate con-tinued growth. Accommodating this growth within the District’s adopted educational program will require expansion of selected existing facilities, construction of new facilities on acquired sites, and temporary housing of students in portables until such time as permanent facilities can be provided.

Enrollment in the Monroe School District has been increasing steadily since the 1980’s. This trend is partially due to an increase in births in the 1980’s and 1990’s as the children of baby boomers entered the schools. It is also due to continued housing and population growth in Snohomish County. The medium range enrollment projection for Monroe School District is expected to increase from today’s enrollment of 6,795 to 7,500 students in 2010 and to more than 9,100 students by 2020. The long range forecast suggests that the District could see an additional 1,000 elemen-tary students, approximately 500 more middle school students, and an increase in high school enrollment of over 600 students by 2020.

School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utiliza-tion and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classroom facilities (portables).

Background 2




2.0 Background

The District’s educational program standards which directly affect school capacity at the middle school level are out-lined below.

> Class size for middle school grades should not exceed 28 students.> As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have work space during planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day.> Special Education for students will be provided in a self-contained classroom.> Identified students will also be provided other nontraditional educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: Resource Rooms (i.e. computer labs, study rooms); Special Education Classrooms; and Program Specific Classrooms (i.e. music, drama, art, science, family and consumer science, physical education, technology education).> Desired design capacity for new middle schools is 750 students. However, actual capacity of individual schools may vary depending on the educational programs offered and/or geographic area served.

Portables are used as interim classroom space to house students until construction of permanent classroom facilities takes place. The Monroe School District currently uses 30 portables at various school sites throughout the District to provide additional interim capacity; seven of these portables are currently located at the middle school level. These portables will continue to be used and moved from site to site in order to meet instructional needs and temporarily house students as necessary until permanent facilities are constructed or service areas are adjusted.

2.3 Middle School Capacity

The table below is a summarization of information taken from “Monroe School District Enrollment, Demographic Trends and Projections prepared by William L. (“Les”) Kendrick, dated May of 2007. The information presented in that report suggests that additional capacity will not be necessary for grade levels 6-8 over the next six years. As indicat-ed in the table below, it is projected that both Monroe area middle schools will be under capacity by 288 students in the year 2012. The longer-range enrollment forecast however suggests that by 2020, significant growth is expected to occur within these grade levels. Future planning should be done to account for this growth but expansion of these facilities to accommodate increased enrollment does not appear necessary at this time.

Middle School Capacity – Monroe Area

School Educational Program Capacity


2006 Unhoused

Projected 2008Enrollment

Projected 2010 Enrollment



MNM 655 495 (160) 451 469 514 (141)

PPM 935 603 (332) 681 713 788 (147)

Totals 1,590 1,098 (492) 1,132 1,182 1,302 (288)

Background 3




2.0 Background




2006 Unhoused





HRM 442 293 (149) 292 305 337 (105)

Totals 442 293 (149) 292 305 337 (105)

* Monroe schools and Maltby schools have been separated due to distance in geographic area related to busing and student service. Capacity related to schools within each area should be evaluated separately.* Portables are not included in program capacity calculation.* The projections above are based on Monroe School District’s educational program capacity forecasts.* Educational Program Capacity is calculated by number of classrooms (including music and p.e.) times 28 students per class room at 83% room utilization.

2.4 Middle School Program Assessment

A significant challenge for this facility due to age, configuration, and construction type is its ability to support the District’s current instructional methods and facilitate curriculum objectives. Systems such as inadequate electrical outlets, minimal technology, and uncomfortable environments can be changed with a renovation but relationships, room configurations and limited site availability at Monroe Middle School provide some significant and costly obsta-cles, which many times results in a total building replacement.

Background 4




3.0 Project Description

3.1 Location

Monroe Middle School is one of the District’s three middle schools and is located near downtown Monroe. This facility’s feeder schools are Salem Woods Elementary and Monroe Elementary. Less than one-half mile away is Park Place Middle School which serves the other half of the eastern portion of the District. The school is surrounded by single-family residential homes on all sides.

The entrance to Monroe Middle School is from the south via N. Sams Street or Short Columbia Street. The school site is bordered on the west by Kelsey Street and on the north by W. Hill Street.

The site is located within the governing jurisdiction of the City of Monroe.

The school address is:

Monroe Middle School351 Short Columbia StreetMonroe, Washington 98272-1802.

3.2 Construction History

Monroe Middle School was built as a replacement for the original Monroe High School, which was mostly torn down at this site after the 1965 earthquake. The school was rebuilt at the original site and utilizes buildings that were part of the original Monroe High School Complex. The oldest building on site is the Vocational Building which was originally constructed in 1954 with an addition added in 1981. The Science Building was constructed in 1964, with two additions added in 1967. The Classroom/Library building, Physical Education and Administration buildings were constructed in 1967. An Auxiliary Gym and Lunchroom addition was added to the PE building in 1980. The entire facility was re-roofed in 1989. An addition to the Administration building was added in 1990.

Refer to Attachment A in the Appendix for construction dates of the buildings and additions.

Project Description 5




4.0 Site Improvements4.1 Site Description

Monroe Middle School is composed of five buildings connected by covered walks on a level 5.28-acre site. The existing site is fully developed with buildings, walks, and parking except for a small area to the east which is occupied by two portable classrooms and includes a small grass play area. The existing buildings are arranged in an appropri-ate configuration to promote ease of accessibility and prominence. The Administration Building is well situated at the front of the school providing good supervision and a formal entry to the campus, the library is central to the cam-pus and located within easy access of the parking lot for evening community use. The gym is related appropriately for access to the playfields except for P.E., which requires students to cross Kelsey Street for access to the play-fields. The entire site is surrounded by a 6-foot high chain link fence with gated access to the north, south and west. The main entry to the site has large swinging chain link gate, which can secure the entire site. Concrete walkways connect the five buildings.

4.2 Site Elements

ParkingExisting on-site parking is asphalt and supports approximately 98 vehicular spaces. Of this total, there are three accessible (handicap) parking spaces, two of which meet current code requirements. Five spaces are designated as visitor parking. The asphalt is in satisfactory condition and the parking lot is minimally illuminated by high intensity discharge (HID) lighting.

The City of Monroe Zoning Code off-street parking requirements are:

> 1.5 spaces for each staff member; plus> 1 space for every 4 persons based on occupancy of public assembly areas.> Adjacent property may be developed for parking as long as it is under the same ownership and is not more than 300 feet from the perimeter of the site.

Current staffing is estimated at 75. At 1.5 spaces per staff member - 113 parking spaces are required.

The public assembly areas per the City of Monroe Planning Department include all three gymnasiums and do not include the Library or Cafeteria. The occupancy load factor for the gymnasiums is calculated per the 2003 Interna-tional Building Code as follows:

Main Gym 10,130 s.f. Practice Gym 4,095 s.f. Aux. Gym 2,380 s.f.

Total 16,605 s.f. 16,605 s.f. / 15 s.f. per person = 1,107 Occupants

At 1 parking space per 4 occupants - 277 parking spaces are required.

Site Improvements 6




4.0 Site Improvements

Parking (continued)In summary, the current City of Monroe Zoning Code requires 390 (113+277) off-street parking spaces to serve the existing facility. If the practice gym and auxiliary gym is converted into other uses (i.e. cafeteria, kitchen, classrooms), the City required parking count could be reduced by approximately 108 parking spaces for a total of 282 required spaces.

If the School District believes the existing 98 spaces and off-site parking have historically provided sufficient capac-ity to serve the existing facility, further discussions with the City to relax this requirement or pursuit of a variance may be in order.

Based on the existing 98 spaces, the ADA Code requires 4 accessible stalls; one of which is to be van accessible. Currently 3 standard accessible stalls are designated (one space needs minor modifications to meet current code requirements) and no van accessible stalls are provided. If 390 parking spaces are provided, 8 of these spaces are required to be accessible with one designated as van accessible.

Auto/Bus CirculationCars enter though the main entry and immediately park in the main on-site parking lot, or proceed to the drop/off and pick-up area. The student loading and unloading area is small and regularly becomes congested during peak times. As a result, many parents use Kelsey Street to drop off or pick up students resulting in a less than desirable situation for monitoring student safety as they access the site. Due to lack of auto drop-off and pick-up area, the buses load and unload students at the back of the school on the shoulder of W. Hill Street. This provides a good separation of buses and cars at peak times but also causes supervision issues with students entering from the rear of the site. Correction of these issues will require additional property acquisition or replacement of selected building(s) with a 2-story facility to free up site area.

DrainageThe site collects surface stormwater and roof drainage through catch basins and PVC pipes that drain to on-site infiltration areas. The stormwater is infiltrated back into the ground through perforated PVC pipe encased in a cross section of 4-foot wide by 4-foot deep gravel dry wells of varying lengths.

Any major improvements to the site will require conformance to the current stormwater manual. This generally in-cludes addition of water quality treatment through grass-lined swales or a cartridge filter system. The treated water then can be discharged to an underground filtration system similar to the existing system but up-sized to current code.

PavingThe existing asphalt paving at the parking lot was installed in 1990 and consists of 2” of asphalt over 4” of ATB. The paving appears to be in satisfactory condition. New striping was painted during the summer of 2007. Other asphalt surfaces at the paved play area and throughout the campus courtyards are in bad condition. Paving is not level, cracks have formed, and the surface is deteriorating.

Concrete sidewalks around the buildings are in good condition. The courtyard concrete paving however is in bad condition. Surface spalling and cracking was noted at numerous locations and large areas are in need of replace-ment. Paved emergency access lanes do not currently exist around the campus. Specific solutions to correct this deficiency will need to be addressed with the City as part of any major renovation. Site Improvements 7




4.0 Site ImprovementsSite UtilitiesElectrical - Site is served by underground power originating from a transformer located at the southeast corner of the site providing 3000 amp, 277/480 volt, three-phase, four wire service.

Gas – Site is served by gas. Metered gas enters the site from W. Hill Street at the north side of the site.

Water – The City of Monroe provides good water supply and pressure. It is anticipated that any new water service required by Monroe Middle School can be accommodated by the existing water system in Kelsey Street.

Sanitary Sewer – Sanitary sewer is available at this site. It is anticipated that any new connections necessary can be made to the City’s system located in the streets around the Monroe Middle School property. LandscapingThe existing site is Zoned “Public Service and Park Zone” (PS). The City of Monroe Zoning Code requires “at least ten-percent of the site to be landscaped for any use. Along common borders, with any use other than parks, open space and buffers shall be installed with landscaping.” Buffer requirements are defined in the code and vary depend-ing on adjacent property uses. Current buffer landscaping is non-existent and will need to be added around the property to meet current code.

Landscaping at the existing parking lot is minimal. The current Zoning Code requires five percent of the parking area to be landscaped. It is assumed that the City will require additional landscaping islands in the parking lot to meet the five-percent requirement. This will reduce available parking spaces which are already significantly less than the requirements of the current City Code.

Ornamental landscaping around the site is minimal and consists of a combination of plants, trees and lawn. The site does not have landscape irrigation except for a small area of lawns/shrub beds at the main entry. Irrigation of planted areas around the campus and the grass playfield area will help preserve and protect growth of these areas, reduce maintenance efforts, and provide more utilization of the limited amount of grass playfield area.

Site AccessibilityThe individual buildings are connected by concrete walkways. All walkways appear to be in satisfactory condition except for the central courtyard that is showing signs of deterioration. The entire campus is accessible via walkways and ramps. Exterior entrances to the buildings should be retrofitted with door hardware, which complies with the cur-rent ADA code. Many of the exterior doors swing out into the pedestrian travel way presenting a safety issue. One set of restrooms located at the Classroom Building was remodeled in 2000 and conforms to current ADA stan-dards. Consideration should be given to renovation of all other restroom facilities for conformance to current code.

The main entrance to the Science building is not handicap accessible. Building access for the handicapped is gained through a side door of the facility.

There is no handicap accessibility at W. Hill Street where the buses load and unload.

Site Improvements 8




4.0 Site ImprovementsSite ElementsA number of benches, bike racks and trash receptacles exist on the current site. All appear to be in satisfactory condition and appropriately placed.

Pedestrian and security exterior lighting is minimal and antiquated throughout this campus-style complex. New and appropriately located lighting is recommended for safety and security.

The paved play area is located directly adjacent to at least six classrooms. Recess noise disrupts the classrooms during recess periods. Equipment at the paved play area is limited to six basketball hoops, three tether ball poles, and four four-square courts. Basketball hoops and backstops are in poor condition. There is no covered play area. Consideration should be given to enlargement of the paved play surface and maximum efficiency of desired play equipment. The addition of a covered play area should be considered.

Two portables stand at the east side of the site near the grass playfield. These portables appear to be at least 40-years old and it is doubtful they can be relocated to another site if needed.

Site Improvements 9




5.0 Facility Description5.1 Architectural

5.1.1 General The campus consists of five, one-story buildings containing a total of 84,997 square feet distributed as follows:

Classroom/Library Building 25,741 s.f. Science Building 11,182 s.f. Administration Building 3,837 s.f. Gym Building 33,677 s.f. Vocational Building 10,560 s.f.

Total 84,997 s.f. Two occupied portable classroom buildings are located on-site for overflow classroom space.

Refer to Attachment B in the Appendix for an existing campus site plan.

Exterior Although the ages of the buildings vary, they are similarly constructed. All have conventional spread and strip foot-ings with a concrete slab on grade ground floor. Exterior walls consist of solid masonry and masonry veneer except for the Vocational building which has some metal siding. The masonry appears to be in good condition except for signs of effervescence, which indicates moisture penetration. A majority of the fascia and soffits are wood, which requires continued maintenance of painting. New roofing and roof insulation was added to all buildings in 1989. The roofing is now 80% through its expected life. Exterior doors and frames are hollow metal and most are in satisfac-tory condition. Exterior door hardware is old, mismatched, and in need of replacement throughout to conform to ADA and District standards. Windows (except for the Administration Building) are single-pane, non-insulated, with alumi-num frames which do not comply with current energy code requirements.

InteriorThe interior walls are primarily a combination of reinforced masonry, reinforced brick, reinforced concrete, and wood studs. Finishes include painted and integral colored masonry, plaster, sheetrock, and wood paneling.

Doors are predominately wood in hollow metal frames. Relites are single glazed in hollow metal frames. Door hard-ware is mixed and most does not comply with ADA standards.

Floor finishes include carpet, vinyl tile, and rubber tile over vinyl asbestos tile. The main gym has a wood floor and the auxiliary gyms have cushion vinyl floors. Much of the flooring (especially in the Classroom/Library Building) is worn and has surpassed its useful life.

Ceilings consist of suspended acoustical panels, glue-on acoustical ceiling tiles, exposed structural decking, and gypsum board.

Various types and finishes of casework, chalkboards, markerboards, toilet accessories, etc. exist throughout the facili-ty. Many of these items are in a state of disrepair due to age and require continual maintenance or must be replaced.

Facility Description 10




5.0 Facility DescriptionHazardous MaterialsThe campus is reported to contain friable asbestos containing materials such as pipe insulation and non-friable vinyl asbestos floor tile. The Classroom/Library building contains insulated asbestos panels at the window areas. A haz-ardous material survey by an independent consultant is recommended in conjunction with planning of future modern-ization, additions or replacements.

5.1.2 Classroom/Library Building

GeneralThe library contains adequate square footage to serve the facility although the configuration is irregular in shape and somewhat inefficient. The casework is old and mismatched as well as inefficient. The building has had various in-terior modifications and retrofits which is evident by the amount of exposed electrical and data raceways and wiring. The carpet has surpassed its useful life and is in need of replacement. The classrooms are small, irregular in shape and contain minimal casework. There is very little classroom storage available. Operable walls between classrooms are not used and given the age, may not work properly and do not provide adequate acoustical value between class-rooms. Minimal technology and convenience outlets exist which impair current instructional delivery systems. The classrooms are arranged in a pod configuration around a common workroom. The common workrooms contain two sinks that serve the surrounding classrooms. Relites between the classrooms and the commons area provide visual supervision into each area. There is a mixture of chalkboards and whiteboards throughout the classrooms. Unit ven-tilators in each room provide heat for the building. These units are in need of replacement. Power and data outlets are below district standards in number and location and limit certain types of instruction.

5.1.3 Science Building

GeneralThis rectangular building is configured with a double-loaded corridor that provides access to science, biology and computer labs. The labs are large and provide more than sufficient instructional space. The building consists of a masonry exterior with wood framed interior walls. The facility has been adequately maintained but is showing signs of deterioration due to age. Science casework is old and outdated, new door hardware is needed throughout, restrooms are not ADA accessible, and most windows are fitted with single-pane, non-insulated glazing which is very energy inefficient. All plumbing in this building is galvanized pipe and often supplies rusty brown water. Rooms are heated by old electric unit ventilators which is one of the most expensive forms of heat available. Some of the data and power in this building has been upgraded, but not all of it.

5.1.4 Gym/Cafeteria Building

GeneralThe Gym/Cafeteria Building contains the Main Gym which is large and has a wood floor. The Main Gym has manual bleachers capable of seating the entire student population. These bleachers are in need of replacement or total ret-rofit due to age and wear. The cafeteria is long, narrow and undersized to serve the existing student population. The existing facility serves approximately 500 students in three lunch periods. The existing kitchen is undersized, under-equipped, and outdated to function as a kitchen.





5.0 Facility Description

Connected to the main gym is the auxiliary gym, which can be divided into two areas by use of a drop-down gym divider curtain. The cushion vinyl floor in the auxiliary gyms is in need of replacement. Three gyms are excessive for a typical middle school facility. The third gym doubles as a play area for the students during bad weather as the facil-ity does not have a covered play area. The restroom facilities in this building are very limited. Additional restrooms should be provided. The locker rooms receive limited use by the 7th grade PE class (who are not required to show-er). The special education room is inadequate to serve the needs of the occupants. The music room is not handicap accessible. 5.1.5 Vocational Building

GeneralAt 48 years old, this is the oldest building on campus. It houses the school’s vocational programs consisting of art, wood shop, plastic and metals. The building was originally set up for welding and foundry, but the program is no lon-ger in existence. Although the school currently has a strong wood, metals and plastic program, the area dedicated to the instruction of this program is excessive when compared to the current school district educational specifications.

5.1.6 Administration Building

GeneralThe administration building is the newest of the campus facilities. This building appears to be adequately sized and functions well. It provides an identifiable entry to the campus and serves to provide good supervision of the main parking lot.

If this school undergoes selective renovation and replacement, the Administration Building could remain. It should be noted, however, that its control location may limit efficient organization and placement of proposed new buildings.





6.0 Engineering Requirements

6.1 Structural Engineering Requirements

Description of Structural SystemsThe Monroe Middle School consists of five one-story buildings, primarily constructed with wood-framed roofs and brick walls. The Vocational Building was constructed in 1954, with a renovation in 1981. The Science Building was constructed in 1964, with an addition in 1967. The Gymnasium Building, Classroom/Library Building, and Adminis-tration Building were constructed in 1967, with a Gymnasium addition in 1980 and an Administration Building addi-tion in 1990. Vertical Force-Resisting SystemThe Vocational Building, the Science Building, the Classroom/Library Building, and the Administration Building roof framing consists of wood decking spanning between glue-laminated beams. Steel columns support the roof framing. The first floor consists of a concrete slab-on-grade. The foundations consist of spread footings. The Science Build-ing addition is of similar construction.

The Gymnasium Building roof framing consists of tongue-and-groove wood decking spanning between open-web steel joists at 8-feet on-center. The two wings on the east and west sides of the main gymnasium consist of a 3-inch concrete slab over metal deck which is supported in turn by open-web steel joists at 2-feet on-center. Steel columns support the roof framing. The 1980 addition roof framing consists of tongue-and-groove wood decking spanning between glue-laminated beams, which are supported in turn by deep glue-laminated beams. Steel columns or ma-sonry walls support the roof framing. The ground floor consists of a concrete slab-on-grade.

The Administration Building addition roof consists of similar wood-framing to the original building, except that wood stud walls support the roof framing.

Lateral Force-Resisting SystemLateral loads are the result of wind on the exterior walls, or inertia forces due to earthquakes. The lateral force-re-sisting system of the buildings primarily consists of wood roof diaphragms which distribute loads to reinforced brick masonry shear walls. The shear walls in the Vocational Building are probably not reinforced given the age of the building. At the Gymnasium Building, the lateral system around the main gymnasium consists of concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls supported by concrete walls. The addition to the Administration Building utilized plywood shear walls for the lateral system.

Based on a cursory seismic review, the buildings at the Monroe Middle School do not currently meet the require-ments for a complete lateral force-resisting system. Recommendations have been provided to mitigate the noted deficiencies.

Engineering Requirements 13





Seismic Review FindingsBased on our review, the following positive and negative features were noted which will influence the seismic perfor-mance of the buildings.

Positive Features:

> The buildings are relatively regular, both vertically and in plan.> The brick walls in the Science Building, the Gymnasium Building, the Classroom Building, and the Adminis- tration Building have reinforcement and are doweled into the foundations.

Negative Features:

> Original construction drawings were not available for the Vocational Building. However, the building appears to consist of unreinforced masonry walls. In addition, given the age of this building, it probably does not have out-of-plane anchorage to the walls.> The Science Building, the Gymnasium Building, the Classroom Building, and the Administration Building do not have out-of-plane wall anchorage perpendicular to the roof beams. In addition, the out-of-plane wall anchors parallel to the beams induce cross-grain bending which leads to brittle failures in the wood framing.> At the Science Building, the in-plane connection from the roof to the brick walls is not shown. In addition, the diaphragm lacks continuity ties perpendicular to the beams.> At all the buildings, the roof diaphragm appears to be inadequate for the roof spans.> At the Science Building, there appears to be inadequate shear wall length along the north side.> At the Gymnasium Building, there appears to be inadequate shear wall length in the east-west direction. Also, the addition to the gymnasium lacks continuity ties at the glue-laminated beam connections.> At the Classroom Building, there is a mechanical mezzanine level that does not appear to be tied into the lateral force-resisting system.> At the Administration Building, there appears to be inadequate shear wall length along the north wall.> At the Vocational Building, there appears to be inadequate shear wall length in the east-west direction> The Vocational Building has a chimney that appears to consist of unreinforced brick that is not anchored at the roof level. This chimney may be a falling hazard.> There appear to be hollow clay tile partition walls in the Gymnasium and Administration Buildings which presents a falling hazard.

Structural Recommendations and ConclusionsBased on the above findings, the following recommendations are made to address the issues.

> At the Vocational Building, survey the building for as-built conditions and perform a more detailed analysis. Seismic upgrades would most likely include adding new shear walls, especially in the east-west direction, anchoring the walls for out-of-plane loads, tying the brick walls to back-up studs for out-of-plane loads on the walls, adding new plywood onto the roof, and providing continuity ties at the roof. > At the Science Building, the Gymnasium Building, the Classroom Building, and the Administration Building, install a connection between the wall and the existing columns or a connection between the roof beams and the wall. In addition, install struts from the existing out-of-plane wall anchors parallel to the beams to the roof diaphragm.






Structural Recommendations and Conclusions (Continued)

> At the Science Building, install a perimeter steel angle ledger to provide an in-plane connection from the roof to the brick walls. In addition, add continuity ties perpendicular to the beams.> At all the buildings, install a new plywood roof diaphragm over the existing wood decking.> At the Science Building, install new CMU or plywood shear walls along the north side.> At the Gymnasium Building, install new CMU or concrete shear walls in the east-west direction. Also, install continuity ties at the glue-laminated beam connections in the gymnasium addition.> At the Classroom Building, install plywood shear walls beneath the mechanical mezzanine level in order to provide a new lateral force-resisting system.> At the Administration Building, install new plywood or CMU shear walls along the north wall.> At the Vocational Building, install new plywood or CMU shear walls in the east-west direction.> At the Vocational Building, remove the unreinforced brick chimney. Alternatively, anchor the chimney at the roof level and, if necessary, provide bracing for the portion extending above the roof. > Remove the hollow clay tile partition walls in the Gymnasium and Administration Buildings.

6.2 Mechanical Engineering Requirements

Plumbing SystemsThe domestic water piping system is galvanized steel, typically installed under slab on grade. It is common that this pipe flows rusty brown water. There have been many repairs accomplished through the years to stop leaks that have developed. Many of the flush valves are manual flush, no proximity sensing devices were observed.

Several of the domestic water heaters have been replaced within the last six years. It would be appropriate to reuse these existing electric water heaters if five years or less service time to date. We would recommend replacing all electric water tanks that are over five years in service.

The areas that currently serve the fifth grade teaching area are dry classrooms. No classroom sinks exist.

Heating and Ventilating SystemThrough the facility are unit ventilators with electric heat and pneumatic controls. All of these unit ventilators have been in service, some as far back as the 1964 and 1967 portions of Building A. All of these unit ventilators have exceeded their anticipated normal useful life.

Direct replacement with new unit ventilators will be troublesome, as the systems commonly are not within the OSPI required maximum NC35 point source of noise generation in the teaching space. As spaces may be changed in their area to accommodate the teaching program, the existing pattern of perimeter unit ventilators will be interrupted.

All of the existing unit ventilators and air handlers in all spaces except the Administration Building area renovations and additions of 1990 will not be in compliance with current ventilation code requirements.

Life Safety SystemsThere are no fire protection sprinklers. Many of the existing buildings have combustible overhangs that exceed 4 feet from the perimeter wall. These overhangs will require a dry pipe sprinkler system.






Energy Management and Temperature ControlThe existing system is a piecemeal collection of various manufacturers’ pneumatic controls. All of these pneumatic controls like the systems they serve have far exceeded their anticipated useful life. There is no energy management system in use at this site. Mechanical Deficiencies and Recommendations

> The existing domestic plumbing systems should be replaced with copper pipe below and above slab on grade. Replacing above-grade piping may mean exposed piping when there is no ceiling space or furred piping.> The heating and ventilation system does not meet current codes, and has exceeded its anticipated service life. This system should be replaced to provide 20 years (or more) of service.> An Energy Management and Control System (EMCS) should be installed for all new heating and ventilation systems.> A combination wet and dry sprinkler system should be installed, if required by the local building authority.> 3” domestic water service should be replaced to the City main in the street, and the reduced pressure back flow preventor and shut-off valve should be replaced.

6.3 Electrical Engineering Requirements

Main Electrical ServiceThe existing main electrical service to the buildings is a 3000A, 277/480V, 3 phase, 4 wire, Square D switchboard with six fusible disconnects. A Snohomish PUD transformer is 480-120/208V, three phase transformer, and is located on south of the Science building.

The main switchboard appears to be original 1960’s equipment, and replacement parts are not readily available. The main electrical room does not meet current NEC code clearances for ampacity of the main switchboard.

There is a separate overhead feed and separate meter #120711, to an 800A 120/208V service to the Vocational Building. It serves three panels and a 100A sawdust collector. The 800A distribution panel is relatively new, and replacement parts are readily available.

Lighting SystemThe existing lighting system varied depending on the locations. Portables are lighted with 2 rows of 2 lamp industrial fixtures with T-8 lamps. Parking lot lights are HID. 2’ x 4’ recessed fixtures are used in the offices, and suspended 8’ fixtures with HO lamps are installed in a classrooms and library. Existing emergency egress lighting is provided by battery pack which appears to have exceeded expected life and require replacement. The Main Gym contains (2) 4’ tandem wired industrial strip fluorescent fixtures with 3-40W T-12 lamps each. The Auxiliary Gym lighting is 2’X2’ square fixtures and appears to be in good condition and can be considered for re-use in new/remodeled facility. Lights in the locker rooms are linear 8’-T12 and some incandescent lights. Exterior building mounted lights are in poor condition and require replacement.






Fire Alarm SystemFire alarm horn/strobes are installed in classrooms, and exits have a pull stations. Fire alarm panel is a 1967 simplex model 4246-2 and needs to be replaced and a remote annunciator is required at main entry. Facility does not cur-rently have smoke detector coverage.

Intercom/Clock SystemThe intercom and master clock head-end rack in the main office consists of an aging Bogen MCP 35A Console, MT-60C amplifier, (2) SBA-225 call panels and a CLK6A Master Clock. The classrooms typically contain a call switch and wall mounted speaker and clock. The system needs to be replaced with a newer model such as the Bogen Mul-ticom 2000 or Telecenter ICS with updated a GPS controlled master clock and modern GUI computer interface for scheduling, notification and program modifications to the intercom head-end system. The cross-connect wall field for connection to the Nortel PBX cabinet is in the MDF room adjacent to the main office.

Security SystemThe security system consists of a new Panel supporting door contacts and wall mount PIR motion detectors. A CCTV surveillance system should be considered to augment the intrusion system at the campus.

Telecommunications SystemThe telecommunications system consists of an MDF in the main office and (4) IDF’s in the Library, Lab building, Gym and Shop building. The MDF room is not cooled and extremely hot which will result in premature equipment failure unless addressed. The telephone service entrance demarc extension is located on the telephone backboard to serve the Nortel Option 11 PBX cabinet. The PBX cabinet contains (1) digital card and (5) analog cards. The PBX is in excellent condition and should be reused.

The MDF rack is a wall mounted CPI Heavy Duty swing rack with an Ortronics rack mount fiber cabinet (RMFC). The RMFC houses (4) 12-strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cables routing (1) 12-strand cable to each of the (4) IDF’s for the fiber backbone with Duplex SC connectors. The copper backbones consist of multipair voice cabling cross-con-nected with the intercom system. The horizontal copper cabling to the main office area workstation outlets consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with Berk-Tek CAT 5 cable.

The Library IDF consists of (2) 7’x19” CPI rack’s with an Ortronics RMFC and (1) 12-Strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cable with Duplex SC connectors. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in the Library building consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with Berk-Tek CAT 5 cable. The space is large enough to dissipate heat from the switches, but should be located in an environmentally controlled and locked room.

The Lab building IDF is located in the buildings electrical room directly adjacent to a distribution panel. The IDF has (1) 7’x19” CPI rack with an Ortronics RMFC and (1) 12-Strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cable with Duplex SC connec-tors. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in the Lab building consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with Berk-Tek CAT 5 cable. There has been a recent addition of updated Ortronics CAT5e patch panels and Berk-Tek CAT 5e cable. The rack should be relocated to space at least 6’ from the distribution panel to follow BICSI and NEC code violations in relation to the working distance around any electrical panel.






The Gym building IDF in an electrical closet adjacent to the main gym and consists of a wall mounted CPI Heavy Duty swing rack with an Ortronics RMFC and (1) 12-Strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cable with Duplex SC connectors. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in the Lab building consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with Berk-Tek CAT 5 cable. The rack should be relocated to a space at least 3’ from an electrical panel to fol-low BICSI and NEC code violations in relation to the working distance around electrical panels.

The Shop building IDF is on an attic wall mounted backboard with an Ortronics surface mount fiber cabinet (SMFC) and (1) 12-Strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cable with Duplex SC connectors. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in the Lab building consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with Berk-Tek CAT 5 cable.

In looking ahead toward a potential remodel, the telecommunications system should be demolished and updated with new MDF and IDF telecommunications rooms with 50/125 multimode fiber for support of 10-Gigabit Ethernet backbones between the telecommunications rooms (TR)/ IDF’s. A new 50-pair CAT3 multipair backbone to each IDF with rack mounted patch panels should be provided for support of the voice backbone cabling and ease of patch cord cross-connects allowing data and voice port flexibility with the change of a patch cord. Horizontal cabling to the workstations should be upgraded to CAT6 cabling for compliance of Gigabit Ethernet and support future moves, adds and changes. CAT5e cabling could become hard to find in the near future as the industry transitions to CAT6 and augmented CAT6a cabling. The MDF and IDF locations should be in dedicated environmentally controlled and locked rooms. A proper grounding and bonding system should be provided in the telecommunications rooms follow-ing NEC and industry standards. Cable runways to the racks should be utilized for seismic support and as a pathway for cabling support to the racks.

Electrical Deficiencies and Recommendations > The entire electrical system is in need of modernization. Additional power distribution will be required to support instructional programmatic demands and mechanical equipment upgrades.> Lighting changes should be made where possible to upgrade and standardize fixtures for lighting levels and code requirements. The HO lamps in the library should be changed out to T-8 lamps with electric ballasts for energy efficiency.> Changes in the lighting switching and the addition of occupancy sensors will be required to meet codes.> Additional data/telephone outlets should be installed.> A new fire alarm system should be Exterior lighting should be improved.> The existing gym lighting may remain.> New switchboard, panels and feeders should be installed. Existing feeder conduits may be reused where appropriate.> A new intercom system, interfaced with the telephone system, should be considered.> No clock system is requested.> Shop wiring should be upgraded if the Vocational Building is remodeled.





7.0 Summary of Observations

7.0 Summary of Observations and Recommendations

Site Recommendations

> Significant improvements needed to enlarge automobile drop-off and pick-up.> Improved accommodations for bus loading and unloading area.> Renovation of the school will require significant parking modifications per current City Code.> Additional landscaping around the entire site perimeter and within the parking lot is required.> Significant renovations or building replacement(s) will require new stormwater improvements.> Improvements to ADA accessibility.> Replace deteriorated asphalt and concrete paving.> Repair/replace covered walkways.> Increase size and condition of paved play area.> Irrigate and recondition the grass playfield. Increase size if possible.> Add a covered playshed.> Provide new and efficient site lighting for safety.

Classroom/Library Building RecommendationsDemolition of the existing Classroom/Library Building and replacement with a two-story classroom building and new library is recommended. Current size and configuration of the classrooms limits the programmatic capacity of educational delivery and the instructional environment. The small, irregular shaped classrooms along with the lack of storage do not meet current District standards and will be difficult to reconfigure in a modernization without reducing the existing number of classrooms. There is space for a classroom addition but this area would decrease the already small grass playfield area. All of the buildings mechanical and electrical systems are nearing the end of their useful life and are in need of replacement. Replacement of a new mechanical system within the structure of the existing classroom building would be very challenging due to the low ceiling height and the exposed beams that hang down from the roof deck.

The finishes, hardware and accessories throughout are deteriorating to a point where replacement is the most eco-nomical option based on a life cycle cost analysis. The cost required for a major renovation to bring this building up to district program standards, correct life safety issues, and bring it up to current codes is expected to approach 80-percent of the cost of a new facility. A new two-story building would provide additional classrooms and make the site more efficient. A new building would also provide a library and classrooms that meet district educational standards to provide parity among Monroe School District Middle Schools.

> Replacement of this building with a new facility designed to provide a 40-60 year life should be strongly considered.

Summary of Observations 19





Science Building RecommendationsFull modernization or replacement of this building is recommended. The classrooms are adequately sized and con-figured but need all new finishes. Program changes necessitate modernization of equipment, casework and other accessories. Mechanical and electrical systems are in need of replacement. Existing restrooms need total reconfig-uration to comply with codes and be functional for normal use. Exterior upgrades to the building should be consid-ered to replace the single-pane windows, provide new roofing and insulation. Life safety modifications to the existing structure are also recommended to comply with current seismic codes.

> The Science building needs a full modernization or replacement.

Gym/Cafeteria Building RecommendationsRenovation and reconfiguration of spaces in this building should be considered. The large gym is in satisfactory condition except for the existing bleachers, which should be repaired or replaced. Consideration should be given to interior reconfiguration of the existing remaining spaces to more effectively utilize programmed spaces within this building. One possible scenario is to relocate the cafeteria and serving kitchen to the auxiliary gym space; construct a covered play area near the playground to accommodate gym overflow uses; and convert the existing cafeteria and kitchen into additional classrooms, restrooms, and an entry foyer to the main gym. The special education area should be renovated to serve the needs of the program and the music area reconfigured for handicap accessibility.

> The Gym/Cafeteria Building needs to be renovated and reconfigured to extend the life of the building and provide adequate spaces to support the school.

Vocational Building RecommendationsThe extent of physical and programmatic deficiencies of this building makes this a strong candidate for a new re-placement. A wing suited to current vocational instruction could be planned in conjunction with the recommended new Classroom Building allowing multi-media, shop/tech, and art classrooms to be constructed in an efficient man-ner to district standards (refer again to Attachment C and D). It is highly probable that a renovation of this facility will approach 80-90 percent of the replacement cost. State funding possibilities, life cycle cost benefits, programmatic benefits, and overall campus improvements suggest that a new facility for this program is preferable to moderniza-tion.

> The Vocational Building should be replaced with a new building that better accommodates the District’s educational goals.

Administration Building RecommendationsMinor modifications and maintenance items are recommended as part of the overall campus improvement plan. Up-grades to mechanical, electrical, data and the fire alarm system are warranted as part of the overall modernization of the school.

> Upgrades to this building are recommended although total replacement should be considered for maximum efficiency of the site.





8.0 Cost Opinions/Options

8.1 Replacement Cost

To begin a budgetary cost analysis of the options and recommendations presented in this report, a baseline for total replacement of a new facility should be established. Five recent new Middle School/Junior High projects bid in western Washington are shown below. Cost per square foot of each school was calculated and then escalated using historic inflation rates to bring each school up to May 2007 prices. Each project was then escalated as a square foot price over the next four years using an estimated 8% annual inflation rate. The estimated inflation rate should be reviewed and carefully selected as current professional estimator’s viewpoints range from an estimated 7% to 12% annual inflation increase.

New MS/JH Construction Cost Study (Project soft-costs not included)Estimated Escalation @ 8%

School District Bid Date Area $M Bid$/SF on Bid Day

$/SF in May 07

$/SF in May 09

$/SF in May 10

$/SF in May 11

JH #7 Puyallup Oct - 06 97,235 $25.30 $269.35 $290.90 $339.31 $368.46 $395.78

MS #3 SVSD Nov - 06 87,600 $22.14 $252.74 $260.13 $303.42 $327.69 $353.91

Aylen JH Puyallup Nov - 06 97,235 $24.99 $257.01 $264.52 $308.54 $333.22 $359.88

Pioneer MS Steilacoom Dec - 06 83,805 $22.87 $272.90 $281.84 $328.73 $355.03 $383.43

Gray MS Tacoma Mar - 07 116,872 $28.50 $243.86 $252.63 $294.67 $318.24 $343.70

Averages 96,549 $24.76 $257.34 $265.69 $309.91 $340.13 $367.34

Assuming the District intends on running a bond in 2009, an estimated cost per square foot should be determined for a time that coincides with the midpoint of construction. Assuming passage of a 2009 bond issue, and an im-mediate start with design of the project we suggest using the May 2011 projected timeline as the midpoint of con-struction. The historical data above suggests establishing a budgetary cost per square foot for new construction at a minimum of $368.00. These numbers reflect construction costs only. An additional amount of 30% should be added to the construction cost to cover design fees, taxes, permitting, testing and inspection, furniture and equip-ment, etc., to arrive at a recommended total project cost.

After establishment of the initial project cost, it is recommended that an 3% bond management and adminstration budget is applied. On top of this subtotal, an 8% contingency is recommended to protect the District from fluctua-tions in bid market, material prices, scope increases and unforeseen escalation above the 8% annual escalation shown above.

The existing Monroe Middle school contains 84,997 square feet. Based on an estimated construction cost of $368.00 per square feet in 2011, the estimated replacement construction cost of Monroe Middle School would be approximately $31.3 million. It should be noted that this estimate (and the options that follow) utilizes the existing square footage of the current Monroe Middle School facility and does not allow for increased student growth or spe-cial programs yet to be developed.

> Estimated 85,000 s.f. new middle school construction budget - $31.3 million.> Estimated new middle school project budget (30% soft costs) - $40.69 million.> Total project cost including Bond Management/Administration (3%) and Contingency (8%) - $45.26 million.

Cost Opinions/Options 21




8.2 Option 1 – Renovation and Partial Replacement of Existing Facility

Modernization of the existing Monroe Middle School to meet current program standards will require extensive reno-vation of some of the existing buildings and full replacement of others. A project such as this must be evaluated and designed in a comprehensive manner to allow phasing and temporary accommodations to allow continued opera-tion of the school. The complexity will add costs due to an extended construction timeline and accommodations for temporary housing and services to keep the facility operational.

To establish a preliminary cost opinion we have graphically depicted two design schemes (included in the Appendix as Attachment C & D) which indicate replacement and renovation of existing buildings. Utilizing Attachment D as the most comprehensive approach to achieving a quality facility, we assume the parking will be expanded and all build-ings will be replaced except for the Gym/Cafeteria Building which is proposed in this scheme to be modernized.

Estimated cost for renovation and partial replacement of Monroe Middle School:

New replacement building 51,320 s.f. x $368 = Renovation of Gym/Cafeteria 33,677 s.f. x $275 = Temporary accommodations, demolition, phasing

Total Estimated Construction Budget Soft Costs @ 30% Subtotal Bond Management/Administration (3%) Subtotal Project Contingency (8%) Total Estimated Project Budget

8.0 Cost Opinions/OptionsMonroe Middle School Facility Assessment


Monroe School DistrictHutteball & Oremus Architecture

$18,885,760$ 9,261,175$ 3,000,000

$31,146,935$ 9,344,081$40,491,016$ 1,214,730$ 41,705,746$ 3,336,460$ 45,042,206


8.3 Option 2 – New Middle School on Auxiliary Athletic Complex Property

This option explores the possibility of constructing a new middle school on the Auxiliary Athletic Complex Property located west of the existing Monroe Middle School directly across Kelsey Street. The property currently contains the former high school football and track facility and is adjacent to the current District baseball and softball competition fields. Both sites total almost 12 acres. If the existing baseball and softball practice fields at Monroe High School were developed into competition fields, the District would have the full 12 acres to develop as a potential new middle school site. Considering a new 2-story middle school and associated parking located where the existing baseball/softball fields are and the track and football field reconditioned and left in its existing location, this site is a viable op-tion for a new middle school facility.

Positive Features:

> Development of existing Monroe School District property.> New replacement middle school could be constructed without disruption of Monroe Middle School program.> Site is flat and has a high percentage of usable area.> Football field and track needs only minor improvements.

Negative Features:

> Close location to Park Place Middle School and not in an area of the district which is experiencing growth.> Limited site area will not allow baseball or softball fields unless these facilities are developed on the existing Monroe Middle School site once the new replacement school is constructed.

Cost: Estimated project cost for new middle school on the Auxiliary Athletic Complex property:

New Middle School 85,000 sf x $368 = MHS Competition Fields Demolition of MMS and development of grass playfields to serve new facility





$31,280,000$ 2,160,000$ 2,430,000

$35,870,000$ 10,761,000$46,631,000$ 1,398,930$48,029,930$ 3,842,395$51,872,325


8.4 Option 3 – New Middle School on Chain Lake Property or other District-Owned Property

The District owns approximately 14 acres of undeveloped land within a contiguous parcel shared by Chain Lake Elementary School. Of the 14 undeveloped acres, approximately 40 percent is encumbered by critical areas (wetland & buffer). The other obstacle to development of this site is that it is currently outside the Urban Growth Area (UGA) and Snohomish County has a policy of prohibiting the extension of sewer service outside of the designated UGA. Chain Lake Elementary currently pumps sewage from a holding tank, a new middle school will likely need to do the same until such time as this area is adopted into the UGA and sewer is made available.

As shown on Attachment E in the Appendix, there appears to be adequate room to develop a new middle school and associated parking on the southeast portion of the existing site. The limitation appears to be lack of sports field space within the current configuration of the property. Unless the District pursues purchase of adjacent property, playfield use would need to be shared with the elementary school.

Positive Features:

> Development of existing Monroe School District property.> Middle School located in an area of student population growth.

Negative Features:

> Sewer not available. Must pump from a holding tank.> Limited sports field area. Must purchase additional property or share with Chain Lake Elementary.

Cost:

Estimated project cost for new middle school on Chain Lake Property (without sports fields):

New Middle School 85,000 sf x $368 = Allowance for conversion of existing MMS into other use





$31,280,000$ 3,250,000

$34,530,000$10,359,000$44,889,000$ 1,346,670$ 46,235,670$ 3,698,854$49,934,524

9.0 Summary

9.0 Summary

It is evident that the Monroe Middle School is in need of immediate renovation and upgrades. Maintenance efforts and dollars will continue to be spent on this facility in increasing amounts every year. The instructional quality will continue to be limited by the environment in which it is delivered. Existing life safety issues, energy inefficiencies, and code issues will continue to exist until significant action is taken to correct these deficiencies.

This report includes only a few of the possible options for improvements. Cost information has been presented based on the information available at this time. Appropriate contingencies should be added to cover unforeseen market conditions that are not quantifiable at this time. When decisions are reached on a preferred option, it is rec-ommended that further investigation be pursued to further evaluate the scope of work and associated cost impacts.

Available state funding assistance was not investigated as part of this report, but it is assumed that a portion of any significant part of renovation or replacement to Monroe Middle School could receive state matching funding to assist the District with the cost of construction.


Summary 25


Appendix

Attachment A Dates of Construction – Monroe Middle SchoolAttachment B Existing Site Plan - Monroe Middle SchoolAttachment C Option 1a DiagramAttachment D Option 1b DiagramAttachment E Option 3 Diagram

Appendix 26




Attachment ADates of Construction – Monroe Middle School

Appendix 27




Attachment B

Appendix 28

Hutteball & Oremus Architecture Monroe School District


Existing Site Plan - Monroe Middle School

Attachment C

Appendix 29



Option 1a Diagram


Attachment D

Appendix 30



Option 1b Diagram

Attachment E

Appendix 31



Option 3 Diagram

2007 Facilities Assessment Park Place Middle School

September 2007

Compiled byHutteball & Oremus Architecture

Table of Contents1.0 Executive Summary1.1 Introduction1.2 Methodology1.3 Summary of Conclusions

2.0 Background2.1 Overview of Monroe School District2.2 Middle School Enrollment2.3 Middle School Capacity

3.0 Project Description3.1 Location3.2 Construction History

4.0 Site Improvements4.1 Site Description4.2 Site Elements

5.0 Facility Description5.1 Architectural5.1.1 General5.1.2 Classroom/Library Building5.1.3 Science Building5.1.4 Gym/Cafeteria Building5.1.5 Vocational Building5.1.6 Administration Building 6.0 Engineering Requirements6.1 Structural Engineering Requirements6.2 Mechanical Engineering Requirements6.3 Electrical Engineering Requirements

7.0 Summary of Observations & Recommendations

8.0 Cost Opinions/Options8.1 Replacement Cost8.2 Modernization Cost8.2.1 Priority 1 – Life Safety & Systems Replacement8.2.2 Priority 2 – Programmatic Enhancements8.2.3 Priority 3 – Building Enhancements

9.0 Conclusion

Appendix Attachments A - C

Table of Contents


Park Place Middle School Facility Assessment

1.0 Executive Summary

1.1 Introduction

This Facility Assessment Report details the current condition of Park Place Middle School relative to current codes, building systems and materials, and the ability of site and buildings to accommodate the District’s middle school educational program. Park Place Middle School was originally constructed in 1974 to serve as the high school for Monroe School District. Except for a new library building and a couple small additions added in 1990, the school remains pretty much as it was designed 33 years ago. The school has been well maintained over its life but with over three decades use, it is now a prime candidate for a renovation to revitalize the facility infrastructure, upgrade safety components, improve its educational delivery potential, and extend the life of the facility to serve the Districts educa-tional needs for another 30 to 40 years.

The focus of this study is to document and evaluate the current condition of the school and assist the District in determination of a financially viable scope for modernization which will best serve the future interests of the Monroe School District.

1.2 Methodology

Hutteball & Oremus Architecture, Inc., along with Coughlin Porter Lundeen, structural engineers, and Hargis Engi-neers, mechanical and electrical engineers were asked by Monroe School District to evaluate the existing conditions of Park Place Middle School. This investigation involved the following components of work:

> Review of the existing facility and current Capital Facilities Plan.> Analysis of program accommodations for middle school grade band.> Assessment of engineering systems for civil, structural, mechanical and electrical.> Review of available drawings.> Review of enrollment growth projections.> Development of cost analysis.

1.3 Summary of Conclusions

It is believed that Monroe School District will benefit by investing funds to extend the life of Park Place Middle School. To assist the District with the determination of the scope of work required at this facility, our recommenda-tions are divided into three categories and an appropriate budget for each was established. The three categories and associated budgets summarized below are further detailed in the following report.

Priority 1 – Life Safety & Systems Replacements $23.3 millionPriority 2 – Programmatic Enhancements $ 8.8 millionPriority 3 – Building Enhancements $ 8.9 million Total Modernization Budget $ 41 million

The $41 million modernization budget equates to 70% of the replacement value of the school which is estimated to be $58.5 million.

Executive Summary 1



2.0 Background

2.1 Overview of Monroe School District Monroe School District is uniquely located in the southeastern portion of Snohomish County and covers approximate-ly 82 square miles. The Skykomish and Snoqualmie Rivers join to form the Snohomish River in the center of the Dis-trict. The topography includes flood plains to rolling hills. The major east-west road is U.S. Highway 2, leading from Everett to Stevens Pass and Eastern Washington. The major link to Bothell, Seattle, and the east side of the County is SR-522, leading from Monroe to Woodinville. SR-203 is a major traffic link between Monroe, Duvall, Carnation and the Redmond/Bellevue areas.

The District currently serves a student population of 6,795 (October 1, 2006) with six elementary schools, three middle schools, and one high school. “Leaders in Learning”, an individualized secondary program, is also offered in a facility owned by the District but not located in an existing school. Sky Valley Education Center, an individualized program for students in grades K-12 who otherwise would be home schooled, is housed in leased facilities. Summit School is a cooperative program with Snohomish and Sultan School Districts to offer a highly specialized program for students in grades 7-12 and is also housed in leased facilities. Sky Valley Education Center, Summit School and Leaders in Learning student enrollment figures are included in both the District and OSPI figures.

Elementary schools provide educational programs for students in kindergarten through grade five. Middle schools serve grades six through eight and the high school, grades nine through twelve. Leaders in Learning serve grades nine through twelve.

2.2 Middle School Enrollment

A significant issue faces the Monroe School District in terms of providing classroom capacity to accommodate pro-jected enrollment demands due to the rate of student growth. Enrollment projections for the District indicate con-tinued growth. Accommodating this growth within the District’s adopted educational program will require expansion of selected existing facilities, construction of new facilities on acquired sites, and temporary housing of students in portables until such time as permanent facilities can be provided.

Enrollment in the Monroe School District has been increasing steadily since the 1980’s. This trend is partially due to an increase in births in the 1980’s and 1990’s as the children of baby boomers entered the schools. It is also due to continued housing and population growth in Snohomish County. The medium range enrollment projection for Monroe School District is expected to increase from today’s enrollment of 6,795 to 7,500 students in 2010 and to more than 9,100 students by 2020. The long range forecast suggests that the District could see an additional 1,000 elemen-tary students, approximately 500 more middle school students, and an increase in high school enrollment of 600 students by 2020.

Background 2



2.0 Background

2.2 Middle School Enrollment (continued)

School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimum facility size, class size, educational program offerings, classroom utiliza-tion and scheduling requirements, and use of relocatable classroom facilities (portables). The District’s educational program standards which directly affect school capacity at the middle school level are outlined below.

> Class size for middle school grades should not exceed 28 students.> As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have work space during planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of all regular teaching stations throughout the day.> Special Education for students will be provided in a self-contained classroom.> Identified students will also be provided other nontraditional educational opportunities in classrooms designated as follows: Resource Rooms (i.e. computer labs, study rooms); Special Education Classrooms; and Pro- gram Specific Classrooms (i.e. music, drama, art, science, family and consumer science, physical education, technology education).> Desired design capacity for new middle schools is 750 students. However, actual capacity of individual schools may vary depending on the educational programs offered and/or geographic area served.

2.3 Middle School Capacity

The table below is a summarization of information taken from “Monroe School District Enrollment, Demographic Trends and Projections” prepared by William L. (“Les”) Kendrick, dated May of 2007. The information presented in that report suggests that additional capacity will not be necessary for grade levels 6-8 over the next six years. As indicated in the table below, it is projected that both of the Monroe area middle schools will be under capacity by 288 students in the year 2012. The longer-range enrollment forecast however suggests that by 2020, significant growth is expected to occur within these grade levels which could add as many as 500 more middle school students to the District. Future planning should be done to account for this growth but expansion of these facilities to accommodate increased enrollment does not appear necessary at this time.

Middle School Capacity – Monroe Area



2006 Unhoused

Projected 2008Enrollment




MNM 655 495 (160) 451 469 514 (141)

PPM 935 603 (332) 681 713 788 (147)

Totals 1,590 1,098 (492) 1,132 1,182 1,302 (288)

Background 3



2.0 Background




2006 Unhoused





HRM 442 293 (149) 292 305 337 (105)

Totals 442 293 (149) 292 305 337 (105)

* Monroe schools and Maltby schools have been separated due to distance in geographic area related to busing and student service. Capacity related to schools within each area should be evaluated separately.* Portables are not included in program capacity calculation.* The projections above are based on Monroe School District’s educational program capacity forecasts.* Educational Program Capacity is calculated by number of classrooms (including music and p.e.) times 28 students per class room at 83% room utilization.

Background 4



3.0 Project Description

3.1 Location

Park Place Middle School is one of the District’s three middle schools and is located just west of downtown Monroe. This facility’s feeder schools are Fryelands Elementary and Frank Wagner Elementary. Less than one-half mile away is Monroe Middle School. Park Place and Monroe Middle Schools each serve one-half the eastern portion of the District. Hidden River Middle School serves the western portion of the District.

The entrance to Park Place Middle School is off of Main Street which borders the site to the North. To the west of the site is the District’s Transportation Facility, to the south is a dike that separates the school site from the Skykom-ish River flood plain, and to the east are a few single family residences and some light industrial buildings.

This site is located within the governing jurisdiction of the City of Monroe.

The school address is:

Park Place Middle School1408 West Main StreetMonroe, Washington 98272-1802.

3.2 Construction History

Park Place Middle School was originally constructed in 1974 as the high school for the District. It was converted to a junior high in 1999 after completion of a new high school for the District. In 2005 the District moved the 9th grade up to the high school and renamed this facility from Monroe Junior High to Park Place Middle School.

The campus consists of six independent buildings connected by covered walks. Five of the buildings are single story with the sixth building being a two-story library building. Three additions were added in 1980. Another addition and the Library Building were added in 1990. Five of the buildings were re-roofed in 1997 and 1998. An Art & Technol-ogy Program remodel was performed in 1999.

Refer to Attachment A in the Appendix for construction dates of the buildings and additions.

Project Description 5



4.0 Site Improvements4.1 Site Description

Park Place Middle School has a campus-style configuration with exterior circulation to six individual buildings located on a level 19.4-acre site near downtown Monroe. A grass playfield is located in the back of the facility for PE use. Asphalt parking and driveways surround the building to the west, north and east. The campus is mostly open with a small amount of chain link fencing at portions of the site perimeter. The main entry to the site is oriented to Main Street but the campus can be accessed from all sides. A paved access road loops around the entire campus provid-ing emergency access. The general office is located at the front of the school but has limited visibility and promi-nence due to small windows and an architecturally understated main entry.

4.2 Site Elements

ParkingExisting on-site parking is asphalt and contains a total of 192 designated vehicular spaces. Of this total, 13 spaces are designated as visitor parking at the front of the school. No handicap designated spaces were noted anywhere on site.

A parking lot to the west contains 125 spaces. Originally created to serve the former high school, this lot is currently underutilized by the middle school except for event parking. Due to limited drop off area at the front of the build-ing, a portion of this west parking lot has been reconfigured to function as the bus loading and unloading area. The remainder of the lot is leased to community transit. District bus drivers also park at this lot and walk next door to the District’s transportation facility. Joint use of this parking during the day still allows for school event parking in the evening. The east side of the site accommodates another 54 spaces which are used by school staff and District Grounds personnel who utilize a portion of the site.

The City of Monroe Zoning Code off-street parking requirements are:

> 1.5 spaces for each staff member; plus> 1 space for every 4 persons based on occupancy of public assembly areas.> Adjacent property may be developed for parking as long as it is under the same ownership and is not more than 300 feet from the perimeter of the site.

Current staffing is estimated at 75. At 1.5 spaces per staff member - 113 parking spaces are required.

The public assembly areas per the City of Monroe Planning Department include the gymnasium but do not include the Library or Commons/Cafeteria. The occupancy load factor for the gymnasium is calculated per the 2003 Inter-national Building Code as follows:

Main Gym 13,440 s.f. / 15 s.f. per person = 896 Occupants.

At 1 parking space per 4 occupants - 224 parking spaces are required.

Site Improvements 6




4.2 Site Elements (continued)

In summary, the current City of Monroe Zoning Code requires 337 (113+224) off-street parking spaces to serve the existing facility. If the School District believes the existing 192 spaces have historically provided sufficient capacity to serve the existing facility, further discussions with the City to relax this requirement or pursuit of a variance may be in order.

Based on the existing 192 spaces, the ADA Code requires 6 accessible stalls; one of which is to be van accessible.

Auto/Bus CirculationAuto drop off and pick up is accommodated at the front of the school directly off Main Street. One-way circula-tion allows a dedicated circulation path but exiting the site onto Main Street at an uncontrolled intersection causes some congestion at the beginning and end of the school day. The student auto loading and unloading area is small and regularly congested during peak times. The buses load and unload at the west end of the site providing good separation of buses and autos. The bus entrance/exit to the site is from Main Street at a four-way-stop intersection providing good vehicular circulation. Students accessing and leaving the campus by bus from the west side of the campus are difficult to supervise. This problem is mitigated by use of additional school staff to monitor this operation. Separate auto and bus loading areas that can be monitored from a single location would be preferred.

DrainageThe site collects surface stormwater and roof drainage through catch basins and PVC pipes routing them around the site. Existing documentation is unclear but the surface storm water appears to be infiltrated back into the site via 6’x6’ drywells located at the bottoms of selected catch basins.

Any major improvements to the site will require conformance to the current stormwater manual regulations. This is expected to include construction of water quality treatment facilities such as grass-lined swales or a cartridge filter system. The treated water then can be discharged to an underground filtration system similar to the existing system but up-sized to meet current codes.

PavingThe asphalt paving remains in the original configuration as designed and installed in 1974 with the exception of the fire lane which was modified in 1990 to accommodate the new library building and the locker room expansion at the south side of the site

The asphalt paving appears structurally sound but is in need of an overlay almost everywhere. Excessive cracking due to age is prominent throughout all paved areas. Weeds are growing in the cracked areas creating an ongoing maintenance issue. The paving will continue to deteriorate at an accelerated rate if this issue is not addressed.

Concrete curbs and sidewalks around the site are deteriorating. Thirty years of use along with cutting and patching for miscellaneous improvements has created a patchwork of concrete paving. The overall atmosphere of the cam-pus can be dramatically improved by new paving to enhance the pedestrian experience and improve the way-finding functionality of the campus.

Emergency paved access around the building appears to function well and meets current code requirements.Site Improvements 7




Gas – Site is served by gas. Service and meter enters the site from the west side of campus. The auxiliary LPG to natural gas conversion plan has been abandoned. Water – The City of Monroe typically has good water supply and pressure. It is anticipated that any new water ser-vice required by Monroe Middle School can be accommodated by the existing water system located in Main Street.

Sanitary Sewer – Existing sanitary sewer is available to this site. It is anticipated that any new connections neces-sary can be obtained by connection to the City’s system located in Main Street.

LandscapingThe existing site is Zoned “Public Service and Park Zone” (PS). The City of Monroe Zoning Code requires “at least ten-percent of the site to be landscaped for any use. Along common borders, with any use other than parks, open space and buffers shall be installed with landscaping”. Buffer requirements are defined in the code and vary depend-ing on adjacent property uses. Current buffer landscaping appears satisfactory although minor improvements may be necessary as part of a renovation project.

Landscaping at the existing parking lots is minimal. The current Zoning Code requires five percent of the parking area to be landscaped. It is assumed that the City will require additional landscaping islands in the parking lot to meet the five-percent requirement. This will reduce available parking spaces which currently is less than required by the current City Code.

Ornamental landscaping around the site is minimal and consists of a combination of a few plants, trees and lawn. Integration of concentrated landscaping areas throughout the campus will help alleviate the “hard” surface feeling of the existing pedestrian ways and help to promote social gathering areas for the students.

Site AccessibilityThe individual buildings are connected by concrete walkways and courtyards. The entire campus is accessible via walkways under deteriorating covered walks and large roof overhangs which require continual maintenance. Exte-rior entrances to the buildings should be retrofitted with door hardware, which complies with the current ADA code. Many of the exterior doors swing out into the pedestrian walkways presenting a safety issue. Site ElementsA number of benches, bike racks and trash receptacles exist on the current site. All appear to be in satisfactory condition and appropriately placed.

Pedestrian and security exterior lighting is minimal and antiquated throughout this campus-style complex. New and appropriately located lighting is recommended.

The paved play area located at the west side of the campus is in need of extensive improvements. New paving and equipment is needed. Basketball hoops and backstops are in poor condition. No covered play area exists. Consider-ation should be given to reconditioning and enlargement of the paved play surface. The benefits of adding a covered play area should be considered.

Site Improvements 8




Site Elements (continued)The site is fenced at the west and east sides. Fencing should be considered at the rear of the site where native veg-etation is growing on the dike that separates the school site from the Skykomish River flood plain. This is a potential safety issue.

Five portables exist at the south side of the site near the grass playfield. One is used for storage, two for special education classrooms and two for regular classrooms. The portables are appropriately placed on the site and can remain until they are no longer needed.

Site Improvements 9



5.0 Facility Description5.1 Architectural

5.1.1 General The campus consists of (5) one-story buildings and (1) two-story library/classroom building containing a total of 109,912 square feet distributed as follows:

Building A – Gym, Computer Science 32,190 s.f. Building B – Commons, Music, Kitchen 16,218 s.f. Building C - Office, Classrooms 16,774 s.f. Building D – Counseling, Science 14,843 s.f. Building E – Art & Technology 9,265 s.f. Building F – Library, Classrooms 20,622 s.f.

Total 109,912 s.f.

Five portable classroom buildings are located on-site and not included in the square footage above.Refer to Attachment B in the Appendix for an existing campus site plan.

Exterior The buildings are similarly constructed with spread and strip footings with a concrete slab on grade ground floor. Exterior walls are un-insulated brick masonry with small single-glazed aluminum sash windows and painted hol-low metal doors and frames. The exterior masonry is in good shape but numerous areas are painted to cover graf-fiti. The buildings primarily consist of wood-framed roofing on steel columns. The Gym wood roof is supported by open-web steel joists and the second floor of the Library building consists of a precast concrete floor system. Large exposed roof overhangs and covered walkways protect students from rain as they travel between buildings. These overhangs and walkways are painted wood and require regularly scheduled maintenance. Some of the exposed glue-lam beams are showing signs of deterioration and it was noted that several beams have been replaced in the past. Exterior hollow metal doors and hardware are in various states of operation and age, many of which should be replaced.

InteriorInterior walls mainly consist of gypsum board on wood framing as well as exposed masonry which is predominately around the exterior. Almost all of the interior finishes such as carpet, paint, operable walls, ceiling tiles, etc. are in need of replacement.

RoofThe roofs are low–sloped, modified SBS roofing. The roofing was replaced on five of the buildings in 1997 and 1998. With a life expectancy of approximately 25 years for this type of roof system, the existing roofing is approxi-mately 40% through its useful life. Flashings and downspouts are painted galvanized steel and sheet metal. Deterio-ration exists in the roof deck at the downspout connections.

Hazardous MaterialsThe presence of friable asbestos-containing material such as pipe insulation and non-friable vinyl asbestos tile at various locations throughout the campus is documented. A hazardous material survey by an independent consultant is recommended in conjunction with planning of future modernization, additions or replacements.




5.0 Facility Description5.1.2 Building A – Gym, Computer Science

GeneralOriginally constructed as part of the high school program, the large gym provides sufficient space for a middle school program. The maple hardwood floor was refinished in 2007. A divider curtain separates the gym into two instruc-tional areas. Bleachers provide seating which accommodates the entire student body. The ceiling shows staining from roof leaks and should be replaced. The lighting is inadequate and should also be replaced. Even with the large size of the gym, the school incurs a scheduling conflict as the wrestling season overlaps the basketball season. There is space available immediately adjacent to the south of the gym for the addition of an auxiliary gym if desired.

The locker rooms appear to be in good condition and adequately-sized. Minor renovations in the locker rooms should be considered, such as providing handicap restroom fixtures and toilet compartments.

The gym vestibule is in need of upgrades. The low ceiling, outdated and deteriorated finishes, and overall poor envi-ronment should be improved to support school and community events.

Classrooms in this building have been converted to computer instruction. They contain surface mounted conduits, power and data columns from the ceiling and acrylic lens light fixtures. Extensive improvements are recommended to meet programmatic needs and provide future flexibility to accommodate changes in technology and educational delivery systems as they evolve.

5.1.3 Building B – Commons, Music, Kitchen

GeneralThe Commons is adequately-sized but shows signs of failing finishes such as cracking floor tiles. This space would benefit greatly with the addition of more natural daylight. New wall finishes, lighting and architectural interest would make this space a more comfortable and functional place for students and community use.

The restrooms are not ADA accessible and require reconfiguration and all new finishes.

The Kitchen appears to be adequately-sized and functions well. Further review of food service equipment is recom-mended to determine if selective replacement of equipment is needed.

The Music Room requires all new finishes and sound attenuation products for proper acoustics.

5.1.4 Building C – Office, General Classrooms

GeneralThe main office is located at the front of the school but has limited supervision of students and visitors entering and leaving the site. This adds to the already tough job of monitoring a campus style facility for safety. Another possible issue is that the main office is separated from the counseling office which does not allow support staff, office equip-ment and supplies to be shared.




5.0 Facility Description

General (continued)The existing classrooms remain as originally designed for a high school campus in 1974. There is little natural light into the rooms, a minimal amount of casework, and no sinks in the classrooms - typical of a high school program and not a middle school program. All finishes and interior materials are in need of replacement. Current middle school education methods benefit greatly from pod-configuration classroom arrangements with flex-ible break-out space for small group instruction and special projects. The current configuration of all classrooms exiting to the exterior does not promote this educational philosophy. Renovation of this building should consider the viability of classroom reconfiguration to include interior circulation and flexible learning areas centered on classroom pod relationships. See Attachment C concept sketch in the Appendix.

5.1.5 Building D – Counseling, Sciences

GeneralConsideration should be given to relocate the counseling offices adjacent to the general office for efficiency of staff-ing support and commonly use equipment.

The Science and Home & Family Life classrooms are in need of updated finishes, materials and equipment condu-cive to current program needs. The size and shape of the classrooms are adequate but all finishes are showing signs of accelerated deterioration. It is likely that a number of code issues exist at these areas such as ventilation require-ments, emergency equipment requirements, and other life safety issues.

5.1.6 Building E – Art & Technology

GeneralThe interior of this building was modernized in 1999 with all new finishes, casework, mechanical, data, and electrical systems. The interior of this building appears to be in good shape. The exterior should be cosmetically enhanced to blend in with other campus upgrades, as determined.

5.1.6 Building F – Library

GeneralThis building is in good condition and, as the newest building on campus, has minimal needs.





6.1 Structural Engineering Requirements

Description of Structural SystemsThe Park Place Middle School consists of five one-story buildings constructed in 1974, and a two-story building con-structed in 1990. A one-story classroom wing was added to the end of Building A in 1990, and modifications were made to Building E (Art and Technology Building) in 1999. The buildings primarily consist of wood-framed roofs on steel columns with concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls. The two-story Building F also consists of a precast concrete floor system at the second floor.

Vertical Force-Resisting SystemThe original buildings, Buildings A through E, are of wood-frame and masonry wall construction. The roof framing of Building A (the gymnasium) consists of plywood over tongue-and-groove wood decking spanning between open-web steel joists. The roof framing of Buildings B through E consists of plywood over tongue-and-groove wood deck-ing spanning between glue-laminated beams. Steel columns support the roof framing. The ground floor consists of a reinforced concrete slab-on-grade. The foundations consist of spread footings

Building F (the library and classroom building constructed in 1990) roof framing consists of plywood spanning between manufactured wood trusses, which are supported in turn by glue-laminated beams or wood-framed walls. Steel columns support the roof framing. The second floor framing consists of a 2 !” concrete topping over precast concrete hollowcore planks. The hollowcore planks are supported by wide-flange steel beams on steel columns or by the CMU walls. The ground floor consists of a reinforced concrete slab-on-grade.

The Building A addition roof framing consists of plywood spanning between manufactured wood trusses, which are supported in turn by glue-laminated beams. CMU and wood-framed walls support the roof framing. The ground floor consists of a reinforced concrete slab-on-grade.

Lateral Force-Resisting SystemLateral loads are the result of wind on the exterior walls, or inertia forces due to earthquakes. The lateral force-re-sisting system of the buildings consists primarily of wood roof diaphragms which distribute loads to CMU shear walls. The lateral system at the north wall of Building D and the south wall of the Building A addition consists of a wood-framed shear wall. At Building F, the lateral system at the second floor consists of wood-framed shear walls.

Seismic Review FindingsBased on our review, the following positive and negative features were noted which will influence the seismic perfor-mance of the building.

Positive Features:

> The buildings are fairly regular, both vertically and in plan.> Building F and the Building A addition appear to contain complete lateral load-resisting systems.> In the original 1974 buildings, the CMU shear walls are reinforced and anchored to the foundations.> In the 1974 buildings, the CMU walls appear to be anchored for out-of-plane forces (forces perpendicular to the walls) where the glue-laminated beams run parallel to the walls.





Negative Features:

> Building A (gymnasium) appears to lack adequate out-of-plane anchorage for the CMU walls.> The 1974 buildings (Buildings A through E) appear to lack cross-ties between walls.> At Building D, the wood-framed shear wall may be under-sized. In addition, the original plans did not specify anchor bolt spacing, plywood nailing, or hold downs.> At Building F (new library), the wood-framed walls with brick veneer may not be adequately anchored for out- of-plane loads in some areas.

Recommendations and Conclusions

Based on the above findings, the following recommendations are made to address the issues.

> At Building A, install out-of-plane wall anchorage from the CMU walls to the roof diaphragm.> At the 1974 buildings, cross-ties may need to be added perpendicular to the existing glue-laminated beams to strengthen the diaphragm.> At the Building D wood shear wall, remove the existing gypsum board, add anchor bolts and hold-downs to the foundation, and add plywood directly to the wood studs.> At Building F (new library), perform a more detailed analysis on the out-of-plane anchorage for the brick veneer over wood framing. Add straps and/or blocking from the wood studs to the roof diaphragm.

Based on a cursory seismic review, the buildings at the Park Place Middle School meet most of the requirements for a complete lateral force-resisting system, but have some deficiencies. Recommendations have been provided to mitigate the noted deficiencies.

6.2 Mechanical Engineering Requirements

Plumbing SystemsThe existing domestic cold water service serves the campus from the northwest. The city meter is located in a vault at the northwest side of campus. Water is distributed throughout the campus underground to each building.

Most of the plumbing fixtures are newer and in good operating condition. Selected plumbing fixtures in classrooms may need updating to meet District program requirements. Most fixtures appear to have manual flush valves and faucets.

Each building has its own source of hot water. Most of the water heaters are gas fired and have hot water circulation pumps serving each respective building. Building A water heaters (serving the locker rooms) appear to be original 1970’s equipment. The locker room domestic hot water system also has a 1500 gallon hot water storage tank which also appears to be 1970’s vintage and is wrapped with asbestos insulation. The locker room showers appear to have a temperature control system located in the Building A Mechanical Room. This water temperature control system appears to be newer.





Heating and Ventilating SystemMost of the school is served by approximately 23 rooftop, gas-fired air handling units. Age and condition of the existing units varies considerably. Most air handling units are showing signs of aging, i.e. rusting of outer housing, decayed seals and flashing.

Gas service for the campus originates from the west side of campus. The central gas meter is located in a field west of Building A. The campus is also served by a back-up (interruptible gas service) liquid petroleum gas (propane) tank located below grade adjacent to the gas meter. Since the local utilities no longer offer cost effective incentives to in-terruptible gas service, the propane tank and associated equipment are no longer used and have been abandoned by the District. The gas distribution piping downstream of the meter is distributed underground throughout the campus. The condition of the below grade, black steel piping is unknown, but it is more than 30 years old in some places, and has shown some instances of corrosion and leaking. Gas piping enters each campus building above ground. Each campus building has its own gas pressure regulator.

Life Safety SystemsThe campus buildings currently do not contain fire sprinkling systems.

Energy Management and Temperature ControlMost of the campus is served by pneumatic controls. The central air compressor is located in the mechanical room of Building A. Building F is the newest of the buildings and has an Alerton 3500 series DDC control system.

Mechanical Deficiencies and Recommendations

> Replace select gas-fired water heaters.> Replace gym gas-fired water heaters and storage tank.> Replace select rooftop air handling units.> Provide new DDC controls throughout.> A combination wet and dry fire sprinkler system should be installed.> Drain, remediate and remove abandoned propane tank, associated equipment and piping.> Test and evaluate condition of all below-grade gas piping and replace where required.

6.3 Electrical Engineering Requirements

Main Electrical ServiceThe existing main building’s electrical service is a 1200A, 277/480V, 3 phase, 4 wire, switchboard with meter #01 104 524 SN. A Snohomish PUD three phase transformer, and is located west of building A. The main service en-trance 1200A capacity is too small for this site. Typical classroom currently has four duplex receptacles; two in front and one each at adjacent wall.

Lighting SystemFluorescent 2’x 4’ light fixtures are used for classroom, office, and corridor lighting. The Main Gym contains (2) 4’ tandem wired industrial strip fluorescent fixtures with 3-40W T-12 lamps each. Commons area lighting is surface wrap and mono-point incandescent lights.





Fire Alarm SystemFire alarm horn/strobes are installed in classrooms, and exits have a pull stations. The fire alarm system is Notifier system 5000 in main office. Kirkland annunciator panel is also at the main entry. Facility does not have complete smoke detector coverage.

Intercom/Clock SystemThe intercom head-end is located in a storage room inside the men’s restroom in main office and consists of a Bo-gen wall mount cabinet. The Lathem Master Clock in the office is not functioning. Future remodel work should plan for the intercom/clock system to be replaced with a newer model such as the Bogen Multicom 2000 or Telecenter ICS with updated a GPS controlled master clock and modern GUI computer interface for scheduling, notification and program modifications to the intercom head-end system. The cross-connect wall field for connection to the Nortel PBX cabinet is in the same storage room as the intercom cabinet. Security SystemThe security system consists of (2) Silent Knight 4720 Security Panels and (2) 4120 Zone Expander panels support-ing door contacts and wall mount PIR motion detectors. The security panel should be upgraded to a different panel since this Silent Knight panel has been discontinued by Honeywell if a remodel is undertaken. A CCTV surveillance system and perhaps an access control system should be considered to augment the intrusion system at the school.

Telecommunications SystemThe telecommunications system consists of what could be considered multiple MDF’s due to the separate loca-tions of the copper backbones in the district PBX room, multimode fiber in a telecom room (TR) on the lower floor of Building F and singlemode fiber in a TR on the upper floor of Building F. There are also several IDF locations throughout the campus located in shared storage rooms or custodial rooms to serve the horizontal cabling to the workstations in each building.

The phone demarc is located in the main electrical room on the west side of the Gym building with several multipair CAT3 extensions to the phone backboard in the Main office intercom room, telecom rooms and the district PBX room in Bldg-A Gym. There are (3) T1 shelves or chassis in the demarc room connecting the district main PBX to the Nortel option 11 PBX cabinets in other schools in the district.

The district Nortel CS-1000 PBX is located in the Bldg-A Gym Storage room. This room has a 24-strand singlemode connection to the server farm TR on the second floor of Building F and a 6-strand optical fiber connection to the portable IDF classroom. There are (2) UPS’s in the room to support the PBX system. The telecommunications racks in the room are (2) CPI 7’x19” racks housing the multimode and singlemode rack mount fiber cabinets (RMFC), AMP ACO copper patch panels and a DS3 MUX. There is a Verizon singlemode fiber service point of presence (POP) on a 7’x23” rack in the room as well with a battery rectifier.

The IDF room in Bldg-B doubles as a storage room and consists of a wall-mounted backboard with an AMP ACO patch panel with CAT 5 cabling to the workstation outlets. There is a Surface-Mounted Fiber Cabinet (SMFC) for the optical fiber backbone. There is a 6-strand 62.5/125 fiber connected with ST connectors in the SMFC to Bldg-F lower floor IDF room RMFC and another 6-strand 62.5/125 fiber connected in the SMFC to the network administra-tors room also located in Bldg-B adjacent to the Kitchen.





The IDF room in Bldg-C is in a shared custodial room. The IDF houses (1) 7’x19” CPI rack with an Ortronics RMFC and (1) 6-Strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cable to the RMFC in the lower floor telecom room of Bldg-F. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in Bldg-C consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with CAT 5 cable.

The IDF room in Bldg-D is in a shared custodial room. The IDF is on a wall-mounted on a backboard with an Ortron-ics SMFC and (1) 6-Strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cable to the RMFC in the lower floor telecom room of Bldg-F. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in Bldg-D consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with CAT 5 cable. The switch is located on a shelf adjacent to the backboard.

The IDF room in Bldg-E is in a shared custodial room. The IDF houses (1) 7’x19” CPI rack with an Ortronics RMFC and (1) 6-Strand 62.5/125 optical fiber cable to the RMFC in the lower floor telecom room of Bldg-F. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in Bldg-E consists of Ortronics CAT5 patch panels and outlets with CAT 5 cable.

The telecom room (TR) in Bldg-F on the lower floor in the Library in a shared room. The room houses (1) 7’x19” CPI rack with (2) rack mount fiber cabinets supporting the multimode fiber backbones from all the IDF rooms on the campus. The horizontal copper cabling to the workstation outlets in Bldg-F consists of AMP ACO patch panels and outlets with CAT 5 cable from this TR.

The telecom room (TR) in Bldg-F on the upper floor is in its own locked and dedicated room to support district serv-ers and singlemode support to the Transportation Bldg, High School and district PBX room in Bldg-A. The servers and rack-mount fiber cabinets are housed in 4-post server enclosures. This room appears to be the district data center.

In looking ahead toward a potential remodel several factors should be addressed. The district PBX room is located in a space that is too small for its intended purpose of supporting the phone network and should be relocated to the upper floor TR in Bldg-F. The existing PBX room should become an IDF room for Bldg-A with the sole purpose to support the horizontal cabling and copper and fiber backbones of the building. The room can be divided to (2) room to become an IDF room and a separate storage room for gym equipment.

The 62.5/125 multimode fiber backbones should be demolished and replaced with 50/125 multimode fiber for sup-port of 10-Gigabit Ethernet backbones between all of the campus IDF rooms. A new 50-pair CAT3 multipair back-bone to each IDF with rack mounted patch panels should be provided for support of the voice backbone cabling and ease of patch cord cross-connects allowing data and voice port flexibility with the change of a patch cord.

All new the copper and fiber backbones should be pulled to the upper floor TR Bldg-F creating (1) MDF for the con-vergence of the backbone cabling infrastructure in one location. The MDF room in the upper floor of Bldg-F will need to be environmentally controlled 24/7 and house a UPS to maintain uptime for district server and phone support in the event of a short power outage. In the event of an extended power outage, the potential electrical modifications for this room include the addition of a generator to maintain the use of the district servers and phone system.





Telecommunications System (continued)The horizontal cabling to the workstations should be upgraded to CAT6 cabling for compliance of Gigabit Ethernet and support future moves, additions and changes. CAT5e cabling could become hard to find in the near future as the industry transitions to CAT6 and augmented CAT6a cabling.

All IDF locations should be in dedicated environmentally controlled and locked rooms. A proper grounding and bonding system should be provided in the telecommunications rooms following NEC and industry standards. Cable runways to the racks should be utilized for seismic support and as a pathway for cabling support to the racks.





7.0 Summary of Observations The following categories were developed by the design team for use by the Monroe School District in evaluation of several options related to the scope of work for Park Place Middle School. Repair of deteriorated finishes, replace-ment of failing mechanical and electrical systems, and structural life-safety corrections should be implemented at a minimum. These items are included under the Priority 1 Recommendations. Priority 2 Recommendations expand the scope to include program enhancements and functional relationships that are intended to make the school function better educationally. Finally, Priority 3 Recommendations include exterior building improvements which would offer such things as increased natural lighting into educational spaces, a clear and identifiable main entry, over-framing of the existing low sloped roof to provide scale, interest, and an aesthetic component to the campus while at the same time providing a functional element for enclosing and routing of mechanical and electrical systems thereby reducing future maintenance burdens. The cost opinions that follow this section are arranged in the same categories to assist the District in establishing a financially viable scope of modernization for this facility.

Recommendations – Priority 1

The Priority 1 recommendations suggest correction of observed life safety issues and scope of improvements fo-cused on extending the facilities functional life. This includes seismic and structural upgrades and replacement of mechanical and electrical systems that are likely to fail and need replacement in the immediate future. This category also includes technology infrastructure improvements and a minimum amount of miscellaneous architectural im-provements related to replacement of finishes and maintenance driven items. This proposed scope of work is intend-ed to extend the life of the facility for another 30 years but only includes minimal improvements to the programmatic and educational aspect of the facility.


Beyond the scope of this report, but still of high importance to the overall education of the students, is the evaluation of programmatic issues related to classroom arrangement, functional relationships and provision of proper educa-tional delivery tools. This involves further research and involvement of staff and community to determine prioritization of such things as new computer labs, enhancement of the commons/cafeteria, general office reconfiguration, sci-ence classroom upgrades, and other required programmatic changes.

It is recommended that the District consider reconfiguration and upgrades of educational spaces to bring this facility up to current middle school standards.






The items recommended above can be accomplished with little improvement to the 1970’s look and feel of the ex-terior of the school. Architectural enhancement of Park Place Middle School can provide a significant benefit to the District, its students and the community. Park Place Middle School is situated in a prominent location in Monroe and very visible to the community. Enhancement of the exterior to provide an identifiable entry, allow more natural day-light into occupied spaces, and over-framing of the roof to house new mechanical and electrical systems will provide the District with a quality educational facility ready to perform another 30 years. Replacement of covered walkways and enclosing exposed roof overhangs will not only enhance the look and feel of the campus but will also minimize future maintenance burdens. Providing the extra investment to update the exterior of this facility will portray an im-age of civic pride to the District and the community it serves.





8.1 Replacement Cost

To begin a budgetary cost analysis of the options and recommendations presented in this report, a baseline for total replacement of a new facility should be established. This is presented as a check to ensure that estimated renova-tion costs do not approach that of replacement.

Five recent new Middle School/Junior High projects bid in western Washington are shown below. Cost per square foot of each school was calculated then escalated using historic inflation rates to bring each school up to May 2007 prices. Each project was then escalated as a square foot price over the next four years using an estimated 8% an-nual inflation rate.

New MS/JH Construction Cost Study (Project soft-costs not included)Estimated Escalation @ 8%

School District Bid Date Area $M Bid$/SF on Bid Day

$/SF in May 07

$/SF in May 09

$/SF in May 10

$/SF in May 10

JH #7 Puyallup Oct - 06 97,235 $25.30 $269.35 $290.90 $339.31 $368.46 $395.78

MS #3 SVSD Nov - 06 87,600 $22.14 $252.74 $260.13 $303.42 $327.69 $353.91

Aylen JH Puyallup Nov - 06 97,235 $24.99 $257.01 $264.52 $308.54 $355.03 $359.88

Pioneer MS Steilacoom Dec - 06 83,805 $22.87 $272.90 $281.84 $328.73 $355.03 $383.43

Gray MS Tacoma Mar - 07 116,872 $28.50 $243.86 $252.63 $294.67 $318.24 $343.70

Averages 96,549 $24.76 $257.34 $265.69 $309.91 $334.70 $367.34

Assuming the District intends on running a bond in 2009, an estimated cost per square foot should be determined for a time that coincides with the midpoint of construction. The historical data above suggests establishing a budget-ary cost per square foot for new construction at a minimum of $368.00. These numbers reflect construction costs only. An additional amount of 30% should be added to the construction cost to cover design fees, taxes, permitting, testing and inspection, furniture ans equipment, etc. to arrive at a recommended total project cost.After establishment of the initial project cost, it is recommended that a 3% bond management and administration budget is applied. On top of this subtotal, an 8% contingency is recommended to protect the District from unfore-seen fluctuations in the bid market, material price and scope increases and escalation above the 8% annual escala-tion shown above.

The existing Park Place Middle School contains 109,912 square feet. Based on an estimated construction cost of $368.00 per square feet for new construction in 2011, the estimated construction cost to replace Park Place Middle School on its existing site would be approximately $40.45 million plus another $1.5 million for demolition and abate-ment of the existing facility bringing the total to $41.95 million. Adding 30% to this total for soft costs associated with taxes, design fees, permitting, furniture and equipment, etc., and then 3% for bond management and administration costs brings the project cost subtotal to $56.1 million. We then suggest adding an 8% contingency to protect the District from fluctuations in the bid market, material price in-creases above the norm, scope increases, and unforeseen escalation above the estimated 8% per year. This calcu-lates the estimated replacement cost of Park Place Middle School on its current site to $58,492,107.

> Estimated project replacement cost of Park Place Middle School - $58.5 million. Cost Opinions/Options 21




8.2 Modernization Cost

Determining a historic guideline of modernization costs is not as simple as replacement/new construction costs. The wide variety of scope for past middle school modernizations makes it impossible to establish a cost per square foot figure. The estimates that follow are projected to 2011 dollars and based solely on the architects experience and evaluation of the existing conditions and assumptions presented in this report.

8.2.1 Priority 1 – Life Safety & Systems Replacement

Seismic & Structural UpgradesStructural Improvements including patching 109,912 s.f. x $20.00 = $2,198,240General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 175,859

Subtotal Structural Upgrades $2,374,099Site ImprovementsDemo, Earthwork, Allowance $ 485,000Landscaping Allowance $ 65,000Curbs, Sidewalks & Paving Allowance $ 485,000Site Utilities – Power, water, gas Allowance $ 405,000Storm Drainage, Water Quality Allowance $ 390,000Site Lighting Allowance $ 48,000Misc. Site Amenities Allowance $ 240,000General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 169,440

Subtotal Site Improvements $2,287,440

Interior Finishes UpgradesDemolition Allowance $ 100,000Flooring Allowance $ 240,000Casework Allowance $ 430,000Interior Painting, Wallcovering Allowance $ 189,000Walls Allowance $ 243,000Ceilings Allowance $ 265,000Wood & HM Doors Allowance $ 125,000Door Hardware Allowance $ 140,000General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 138,560

Subtotal Interior Finishes $1,870,560

(continued)





Mechanical Systems ReplacementMobilization, permits, submittals 109,912 s.f. x $ .45 = $ 49,460Demolition 89,290 s.f. x $ .30 = $ 26,787HVAC Replacement (except Bldg. F) 89,290 s.f x $48.00 = $4,285,920Plumbing (all piping & 75% of fixtures) 89,290 s.f. x $12.25 = $1,093,803Controls at Bldg. F (excluded above) 20,622 s.f. x $ 5.50 = $ 113,421Fire Sprinklers 109,912 s.f. x $ 3.40 = $ 373,701General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 475,447

Subtotal Mechanical $6,418,539

Electrical Systems ReplacementMobilization, permits, submittals 109,912 s.f. x $ .45 = $ 49,460Demolition 89,290 s.f. x $ .30 = $ 26,787Power 89,290 s.f x $ 14.60 = $1,303,634Lighting 89,290 s.f. x $ 7.80 = $ 696,462Low Voltage 109,912 s.f. x $ 7.60 = $ 835,331General Contractor OH&P @ 8% $ 232,934

Subtotal Electrical $3,144,608 Priority 1 - Total Estimated Construction Cost $16,095,246 Soft Costs @30% $ 4,828,574 Subtotal $ 20,923,820 Bond Management & Administration @ 3% $ 627,715 Subtotal $ 21,551,535 Project Contingency @ 8% $ 1,724,123 Total Estimated Project Cost for Priority 1 $23,275,658

The total estimated project amount for Priority 1 equals approximately 40% of the replacement cost.





8.2.2 Priority 2 – Programmatic Enhancements

Budgeting for programmatic enhancements is not as precise as the preceding category dealing with identifiable life safety and system replacement items. There are numerous elective possibilities that require study and input. Pro-gram deficiencies, options, improvements, and possibilities are typically addressed as part of an architectural pro-gramming exercise produced by committee effort. As such, we can only provide a reasonable budget to work with and task a planning committee with prioritization of items to fit within the selected budget. Our experience has proven that significant programmatic upgrades can be added to the project with an additional 15% of the project replacement cost added to the scope of work identified in Priority 1. This recommends adding another $8,773,816 to the project to accomplish Priority 2.

Priority 2Estimated budget to accomplish Priority 2 adds - $8,773,816.

8.2.3 Priority 3 – Building Enhancements

Utilizing a similar philosophy for budgeting building enhancements for such things as a new entry, sloped roof, new window configuration, covered playshed, or a multitude of other options which will add to the function and overall character of the facility we will again suggest a budget to work with during development of the project’s priorities. We believe that investing up to 70% of the buildings replacement cost into extension of its life is a reasonable and prudent investment. This would provide the District, students and a community with a “like-new” facility and save 30% of the cost of a new facility. Adding the described architectural enhancements to the project will increase the recommended project budget another 15% as follows: Priority 3Estimated budget to accomplish Priority 3 adds - $8,895,000.




9.0 Summary

9.0 Summary

The existing facility is in need of renovation and upgrades. Maintenance efforts and dollars will continue to be spent on this facility in increasing amounts every year. The instructional quality will continue to be limited by the environ-ment in which it is delivered. Existing life safety issues, energy inefficiencies, and code issues will continue to exist until significant action is taken to correct these deficiencies.

This report includes only a few of the possible options for improvements. Cost information has been presented based on the information available at this time. Appropriate contingencies should be added to cover unforeseen market conditions that are not quantifiable at this time. When decisions are reached on a preferred option, it is rec-ommended that further investigation be pursued to further evaluate the scope of work and associated cost impacts.

Available state funding assistance was not investigated as part of this report, but it is assumed that a portion of any significant renovation to Park Place Middle School could receive state matching funding to assist the District with the cost of construction.

Summary 27



Appendix

Attachment A Dates of Construction – Park Place Middle SchoolAttachment B Existing Site Plan - Park Place Middle School Attachment C Option 1a Diagram

Appendix 28



Attachment ADates of Construction – Park Place Middle School

Appendix 29



Attachment B

Appendix 30


Existing Site Plan - Park Place Middle School Park Place Middle School Facility Assessment

Attachment C

Appendix 31


Option 1a Diagram



CHAPTER IX

WAC 392-341-025 (9) The need and the estimated capital cost to restore to design specifications the major building systems and subsystems that have deteriorated due to deferred maintenance.


9. ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST TO RESTORE MAJOR FACILITY SYSTEMS DUE TO DEFFERRED MAINTENANCE

The Monroe School District has traditionally been aggressive in the maintenance of District’s facilities. Upon review of scheduled capital projects none are ascertained as being the results of deferred maintenance. Current projects in the newly adopted Capital Facilities Plan are the result of programmatic changes, code upgrades, or replacement of systems due to age.

CHAPTER X

WAC 392-341-025 (10) A determination of the district’s time line for completion of the school facilities project.


10 01Timelines.doc

10. TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION OF MAJOR SCHOOL FACILITIES PROJECTS

The following is a tentative timeline for completion of new construction and modernization projects. These projects are contingent on voter approval of a future bond referendum and approval of State Assistant Funding. The Board expects to put a bond referendum on the ballot in the spring of 2009. If the referendum passes, and bonds are issued in a timely manner, then the planning, design and construction could be completed by the 2012-2013 school year.

NEW OR MODERNIZED MONROE MIDDLE SCHOOL 1. Design and Permitting February 2009 – April 2010 2. Bidding May 2010 3. Construction June 2010 – December 2011

CLASSROOM ADDITIONS TO CHAIN LAKE AND SALEM WOODS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1. Design and Permitting February 2009 – December 2009 2. Bidding January 2010 3. Construction February 2010 – September 2010

MODERNIZATION OF PARK PLACE MIDDLE SCHOOL 1. Design and Permitting October 2009 – February 2011 2. Bidding March 2011 3. Construction April 2011 - December 2012

Other projects identified under the 2009 bond such as land purchases, roofing, technology upgrades, kitchen improvements, etc. are planned to commence at various times throughout the prescribed 4-year bond campaign.

CHAPTER XI

WAC 392-341-025 (11) An inventory of accessible unused or underutilized school facilities in neighboring school districts and the physical condition of such school facilities.


11. INVENTORY OF UNUSED OR UNDERUTILIZED SCHOOL FACILITIES IN NEIGHBORING DISTRICTS

Introduction The Monroe School District conducted a survey of neighboring school districts to determine if accessible unused or underutilized school facilities were available for use. Each neighboring district was sent a letter requesting if school facilities were currently vacant or scheduled to be vacant within the next six years. Letters were sent to the following districts: Northshore School District Cheryl DeBoer, Facilities Specialist Riverview School District Conrad Robertson, Superintendent Snohomish School District Dr. William Mester, Superintendent Sultan School District Dan Chaplik, Superintendent The Monroe School District Board of Directors passed Resolution No. 1-2008 on the 14th day of January, 2008 stating that this survey had been conducted and is complete. A copy of the resolution is included in this chapter along with copies of the returned survey letters.

CHAPTER XII

WAC 392-341-025 (12) The need for adjustments of school attendance areas within the district.


12. ATTENDANCE AREA ADJUSTMENTS As a regular operating procedure, the Monroe School District adjusts service area boundaries to meet current housing requirements and projections. With every school in the district near or over optimum capacity, changes in the attendance area will not result in adequate space to house school children. Chapter XI indicates neighboring districts do not have unused or underutilized facilities and therefore, an adjustment in District boundaries will not defer the need for new construction and modernization.

of 1

2/25/2008http://www.monroe.wednet.edu/HOME/LINKS/ESMap/Elementary-Attendance-map.jpg

of 1Monroe Public Schools

2/25/2008http://www.monroe.wednet.edu/HOME/LINKS/MSMap/MS1.html

edu.sismadesimple.netedu.sismadesimple.net/board/2007statestudyandsurvey.pdf · office of...

Documents