EDUA

RCTVEFp Republic of the Philippines Department of Education

Region V B

0Visi SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR August 10, 2020

DIVISION MEMORANDUM No. Ls. 2020

CONTEXTUALIZATiON OF SELF LEARNING MODULES (SLM) FROM GRADE 1 TO GRADE 3

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Chief Education Supervisors CID/SGOD Education Program Supervisors Public Schools District Supervisors Principals/School Heads (Elementary) All others concerned

TO:

1. In adherence to Regional Memorandum No. 36, s. 2020, entitled Regional Learningg Continuity Tasks and Guidelines, the SDO Camarines Sur initiates the contextualization of Self Learning Modules in Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (EsP) and Araling Panlipunan in Grade l to 3.

2. School districts shall facilitate the contextualization of SLMs which fall under these categories following the timeline set. a. Tagalog dialect - Del Gallego and part of Ragay and ipocot b. Bicol Central dialect 2nd, 3rd, 4th districts and part of 1st distri C. Rinconada dialect - Baao, Balatan, Bato, Bula. Nabua East, Nabua West d. Buhinon dialect Buhi North and Buhi South

Timeline Development and Self

Evaluation District Validation (with editor's

notes)

Division Quality Quarter Assurance

(with inventory of contextualized modules)

August 10-14, 2020 August 10-21, 2020

3rd August 10-Sept.11, 20204th August 10-Sept.25, 2020

August 17-18,2020 August 24-28, 2020 Aug.31-Sept.4, 2020 Sept. 14-15, 2020 Sept 28-29, 2020

August 19-21, 2020 lst

2nd

Sept. 16-18, 2020Sept.30-Oct.2.2020

3. Attached to this memo are a. Enclosure 1 - List of Writers, Illustrators. Editors/Validators and Quality Assurance Team b. Enclosure 2 Self Evaluation Tool, Format for the Editors' Notes

4. For information, guidance and compliance of all concerned.

LOIDA NIDEA, CESO V Schools Division Superintendent

Address: Freedom Sports Complex. San Jose, Pili, Camuriaes S Email deped camsur@deped gov ph

EDUKASYON SA PAGPAPAKATAO (EsP)

Enclosure 1 Division Memo no. s. 2020

NABUA EAST SLM WRITERS (GRADE 1 TO 3)

GRADE LEVEL WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM Antonia D. Villanueva

Meriam C. Aimazan Gina T. Toriente

Darlene B. Sapinoso

Rowela C. Ibarrientos

Janet N. Salcedo Joan C. Garfin

Anabelle D. Jacob Shirley . Moico

Jenny H. Moreno Genevieve V. Sabio Josephine F. Olaso

Dranreb E. Berja Reygie P. Pequeña Maria May i. Ebrada

Annalyn A. Floresca

Elena B. Garlando, MT Grade

Girlie D. Florece

Grade ll- Lea Placida T. Hugo, MT-I

Grade lll Mila T. Benegas, MT-

NABUA WEST SLM WRITERS (GRADE I TO 3)

Grade Level WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM Gina O. Risare

Rosemarie N. Belano Marivel F. Sta. Cruz Abegail O. Cantome

Karen Mae Q. Veridiano Helen V. Bellen Jezelle D. Abiar

Karen A. Bobis Grade 1

MT-I

Joyce D. Baluca Grade 2 Carissa B. Bona

MT-1 Doris N. Rian

Kareen Delgaco Netty P. Velasquez

Margie Kristine P. Andalis Catherine 0. Nierva

Juliet LI. Llorin

Maricel T. Asyao Maria Isabel C. Nagales

Myla Vita 6. Verango Grade 3

MT-I

EDU

KA

SYO

N SA

PAG

PAPA

KA

TAO

(EsP) t

hru

re 1 D

so

n A

Mem

o no. OL

s. 2

02

o

BIC

OL

CE

NT

RA

L S

LM

WIR

TE

RS

(GR

AD

E

I T

O 3

)

QUARTER 1 QUARTERR2

QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4

GR

AD

E 1

Writer

MODULE 1

Estrella A

. Marco

MO

DU

LE

2

Cyril S. Sargento M

ODULE 3 G

race V. O

rtega M

ODULE 4Jo

seph

ine C. Fausto

MODULE 5

Mauraly B

. Gueta

District

Writer

| San Fernando District

Estrella A. Marco

Cyril S. Sargento G

race V. O

rtega Josephine C. Fausto

District

Writer

San

Fernando DistrictE

strela A. Marco

Cyril S. Sargento Grace V. Ortega JosephineC

. Fausto M

auraly B

. Gueta

District

|San Fernando District

Calabanga West

Pili West District

Mag

arao

Lu

pi

Writer

District

Calabanga West

Pili West D

istrict |M

agarao

Calabanga West

Pili West D

istrict M

agara0

Estrella A. Marco

Cyril S. Sargento

Grace V. O

rtega

San Fernando Distric Calabanga W

est Pili W

est District

|Lu

pi

GRADE 2 M

ODULE 1 |L

eizel D. C

onstantino MODULE 2 M

arife M. Visaya

MODULE 3

Rosalyn N. Cañaveral

Camaligan

MODULE 4

Mary Joy A. D

elfino M

OD

ULE5

Loida R. N

amora

Writer

District

|San Fernando |San Fernando

Wri te

r D

istrict Leizel

D. Constantino

San Fernando W

riter D

istrict S

an Fernando San Fernando C

amaligan

Cam

aligan C

amaligan

Sipocot South

Writer

Jefferson A. B

urce Jefferson A. B

urce

District

Sip

oco

t North

Sip

oco

t North

|Leizel D. Constantino M

arife M

. Visaya_ Rosalyn

N. C

añaveral |M

ary Joy A. Delfino

Loida R. N

amora

Jefferson A. Burce

Marife

M. Visaya

San Fernando |Rosalyn N. Cañaveral

Cam

aligan Cam

aligan C

amaligan

Cam

aligan C

amaligan

Mary

Joy A. Delfino

Lo

ida R. N

amo

ra M

OD

UL

E6

GR

AD

E 3

Write

r D

istrict |C

aramoan N

orth |Lagonoy South

Write

r D

istrict C

aramoan N

orth Lagonoy South

Writer

Purita R

. Ram

os

Karen C. Del Valle

|Raquel A. San Andres

Leah C. Alano

District

Caram

oan North

Lagonoy South Tinam

bac North

Writer

Josephine C. Bigtas Sipocot South

Helen B. Lasic

District

MODULE 1 Purita R. Ram

os M

ODULE2 K

aren C. Del Valle M

ODULE 3 R

aquel A. San A

ndres T

inambac N

orth MODULE 4 Leah C. Aiano M

ODULE 5 Josephine C. Bigtas

MODULE 6

Helen B

. Lasic

Purita R. Ram

os K

aren C. Del Valle R

aqu

el A. S

an An

dres

Tin

amb

ac No

rth

Leah C. Alano

Sip

oco

t No

rth

Lupi

Sipocot South_ |Sipocot N

orth

Lupi

Lupi

QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM

GERUMI S. SEÑAR

MARIA ALICIA L. BALCE

VIVIAN F RODRIGUEZ

MYRA A. LUMAME

CHRISTOPHER JAMES SJ. RECRE0 MARICEL

L ELPOS

SDO

-CA

M.sU

R

PILI WEST SIPOCOT NORTH

CA

NA

MA

N

CA

BU

SAO

CALABANGA

EAST

EDUKASYON SA PAGPAPAKATAO (ESP)

Enclosure 1 Division Memo noos. 2020

B.ALATN SLM WRITERs (GRADE I TO )

Grade Level WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM

Haxver Joy M. Arillas

Yoradyl N. Colecha

Ana Liza B. Estadilla

Julia D. Ruin Elsa C. Aslor

Leilanie I. Armante MT-I Grade 1

Cecilia B. Barra MT- Brian A. Paz

Margie B. Bergonia Mariano B. BorcelesS

Vilma S. Esplana Juvy T. Tigue

May Flor F. De Lima Dannica Jane P. Fuentes

Melanie B. Belen Isabel A. Regino Carlo L. Bataller

Bartoiome B. Tigue

Grade 2 Edna P. Lanuzo MT-I

Grace B. Borja MT

Grade 3 Consuelo M. Penol MT-

BATO SLM WRITERS (GRADE I TO 3)

Grade Level WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM Ma. Regina B. Buena

Ma. Victoria 0. Bustarga Joanne T. Gariplan Benardita P. Tuyay Rosa S. Apondar

Antonina M. Arevalo Rosa B. Fajardo Jhoan B. Colico Ruby L. Salmo Jasmin T. Regaspi

Sharon F. Tanay Gemma D. Azul Armie A. Bernaldez Cristina T. Viedor Josefa L. Espinola Regina B. Cerdon

Vilma S. Cangayo, MT- Emenilda G. Mesoga, MT- Neda S. Oiva, MT-1

Grade 1

Selma T. Yorobe, MT-Donna C. Laut, MT- Mary Anne B. Placides, MT-I Grade 2

Lucia B. Guanzon, MT-I Marites V. Cabrera, MT- Teresita L. Rubianes, MT-II Grade 3

Enclosure Na 2 to Diwsion Memoran dum No. s. 2020

The LRMDS Evauotion Tools with notations:

individuai Report Team Report

EVALUATION TOOL FOR CONTENT DepEd-developed Modules

Leaming Area Grade Level Title

Instructions:

1Carefuily reac he eaming resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance to stancards indicated n the criterion items under the six (6) factors below. ut a check max () in the appropriate column beside each citernon item. If your answer is

NO. Cite specic pages. briefly indicate the erors found, and give your recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings, Corections, and Review form. Write Not Appicabe (NA) for ased on te number of citerion items marked "YES" under each factor, mark the appropriate column to indicate f the LR complied or not to the standards.

For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items and muitiply this with 75% to determine the cutoff for compliance.

ms that does not apply in the LR evaluated.

Standards/ Criterion Ite ms Yes No Factor I. inteliectual Property Rights Compliance 1 The leaming resource has no copyright violations. This means that all

the petures usedthe M were personally captured by the writer and/or information were token from he aiowed and reliable sources such as the 1) sites

of governrment ogenc es /oth gov.ph} like DepEd websites, LGU sites, DT, DOT; 2]

DepEd comman, 3 Open Eaucation Resource (OER); or 4] from those websites of private individuci or greup rur with official permission to use the materials from their sites: 5} jrom sources whcre writer died for more than 70 years; 6] public

documents like the Philipaine Constitution OZE Tisitemis nonaiegotiable) 2 The copyrighted texts and visuals used in the LR are cited. NOTE: Only

those identified in Item1

3 The copyrighted materials used in the LR are accurately cited. NoTE Only those identified in Item 1

4. The referen ces are properly cited in the Bibliography or references.NOTE: Only those identified in Itemi

Note: At least 3 cnterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor

Factor lI. Learning Competencies

Not Complied Compiied

Content is consistent with the targeted DepEd Leaning Competencies (LCs) or the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC) intended for the leaming area and grade level. Indicate the code just after each competency used in the IM/LM

Note: The item must be marked YES to indicate compliance. Not Complied Complied

Factor ll. Instructional Design and Organization

The LR contributes to the achievement of specífic objectives of the learning area and grade level for which it is intended.

2. Sequencing of contents and activities within each lesson facilitates achievement of objectives

3. Content is suitable to the target leamer's level of deveiopment, needs, experience.

4. Content reinforces, enriches, and/ or leads to the mastery of the targeted earning competencies intended for the learming area and grade leve.

| 5. Content is logically developed and organized throughout the material (Lessons/activities are arranged from simple to complex, from observable to abstrat).

6 The LR contains useful introductions, reviews, summaries, and other devices that facilitate smooth progression from one lesson to another.

7 Development of lessons allows for review, comparison & integration w previous lessons.

8. Motivational strategies (e.g., overviews, advance organizers, puzzles, games, etc.) are provided.

9 The LR uses various teaching and learming strategies to meet individual differences/ leaming styles. (if applicable)

10. The LR develops higher cognitive skills (e.g., critical thinking skills,

creatvity, leaming by doing, problem solving) and 21" century skills. 11. The LR enhances the development of desirable values and traits such as:

(Mark the appropriate box with an "X" applicable for values and traits only)

11.1 Pride in being a Filipino 11.2 Scientific attitude and /reasoning

11.3 Striving for excellence 11.4 Love for country

11.5 Helpfulness, teamwork, 11.6 Unity

cooperation 11.7 Desire to learn new things 11.8 Honesty & trustworthiness

11.9 Ability to know right from wrong 11.10 Respect

11.11 Critical and creative thinking 11.12 Productive work

11.13 Others (Please specify) Note: At least 8 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Factor V. Instructional Quality

Not Complied Complied

1. Content and infommation are accurate.

2 Content and infomation are up-to-date.

3 The LR is free from any social content violations

4. LR is free from factual errors.

5. LR is free from computational erors (if applicable)

6. LR is free from grammatical errors.

Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to Not this factor. Complied Complied

Factor V. Assessment

1 The LR provides useful measures and information that help the teacher

evaluate learner's progress in mastering the target competencies. Assessments are aligned with the specific objectives and content.

3. The LR provides "self-checks ready-made achievement tests &/or review

activities 4 The LR provides variety of assessment types.

Assessments have clear demonstration/ examples, instructions, and/or rubrics to serve as guide on how these will be used.

6. Variety of activities within the LR are utilized to ensure active engagement of the learners.

Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor.

Not Complied Complied

Factor VI. Readability

Vocabulary level is adapted to target users' experience and understanding.

Length of sentences is suited to the comprehension level of the target user.

Sentences and paragraph structures are varied and appropriate to the target user

4. There is logical and smooth flow of ideas within a lesson and from lesson to lesson.

There is consistenty good use of transition devices to focus on the main topics and signal a change of topic.

6 Lessons, instructions, exercises, questions, and activities are clear to the

target user. Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to

this factor. Not

Complled Complied

Recommendation: (Please puta check mark () in the appropriate box.)

Minor revision. This material is found compliant to the minimum requirements in all six factors.

Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented

Major revision. This material is non-compliant to the requirements in one or more factors Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Finding s, Comections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors with NO corections.

I/ We certify that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report are my/ our own and have been made without any undue infiuence from others.

Evaluators(s)Signature(s) Date accomplished:

Individual Report Team Report

EVALUATION TOOL FOR DESIGN AND LAYOUT

DepEd-developed Learning Resource

Leaning Area: Grade Title

Instructions: 1. Carefully read the leaming resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance to

standards indicated in the criterion items under the four (4) factors below. 2. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is

NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the errors found, and give your recommendations in

the attached Summary of Findings, Comections, and Review form. 3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that does not apply in the LR evaluated.

4. Based on the number of criterion items marked YES" under each factor, mark the appropriatecolumn to indicate if the LR complied or not to the standards.

5. For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items and

multiply this with 70% to determine the cutoff for compliance.

StandardsI Criterion Items Yes No Factor l. Physical Attributes a. Cover Page

1. Cover art is appropriate, relevant, and interesting. Use single art design or picturefor the cover. Using of collage of cover art or pictures is highly discouragedCover elements are corect and complete. (i.e., wl grade indicator & leaming area, book title & type (LM, TG), cover art, DepEd text entries, spine entries back cover entries)

b. Front Matter Pages All necessary elements are complete (e.g., title page, copyright page, table of

contents, and introduction I preface (optional).

3

Page numbers are set in lowercase roman numerals; centered at the bottom of the page; no page numbers on the title and copyright pages.

C. Inside Pages

Beginning page of the LR consistently falls on the right-hand page.

6. Pagination is set in Arabic numerals and centered at the bottom of the page. Spaces between letters, words, and paragraphs facilitate reading.

8. Page endings do not end with a hyphenated word or an awkward page turm. (i.e., there are at least two lines of text below a text head at the foot of a page.)

9. There is a maximum of only three consecutive hyphenated words in a paragraph. 10. Pages have no bad breaks which affect readability.

d. Back Matter Pages 1. Has useful back matter pages (e.g..glossary, bibliography, index, appendix, etc.)

Not Complied Note: At least 8 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Complied

Factor I. Design and Layout 1. Consistency of elements (i.e., main heads, subheads, sections, and subsections are

consistenthy classified)Simple (i.e., does not distract the attention of the reader) Attractive and pleasing to look at

4. Adequate illustrations in relation to text. Follow the art-text ratio per grade level with K

to G1 (65%-359%), G2(60%-409%), G3(50%-50%), (40%%-6096), G5-12(30%-7096) Reference: Regiona! Memo No. 36, s. 2020

5. Hamonious blending of elements (e.g. Ilustrations & text) 6. Suitable to the target users Note: At least 4 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this CompiedNot Complied factor. Factor Il. Typographical Organization (e.g, size of letters, choice of font, use of

boldface and italics, etc.)

Size of letters is appropriate for the target user. Refer to Regional Memo No. 36, s. 2020 2. Font styles used are appropriate for the target user and easy to read. Refer to

Regional Memo No. 36, 5. 2020

Size of letters and choice of font enable the target users to easily identify themes ideas and rank them in order of importance. Refer to Regional Memo No. 36, s. 2020 The use of boldface and italics are relevant and appropriate to the text

Note: At least 3 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Complied Not Complied Factor V. Visuals (e.g., illustrations, photographs, maps, tables, graphs, etc.)

Supplement the text Clarify the concept /topic and faciitate comprehension

1.

Consistently clear in content and detail

Relevant to the leamers age, culture, and life situation

Sustain interest and do not distract the leamers attention Appropriately placed in the page and proportionately drawn in size

Property labelled/ captioned (if needed) Artistically appealing, simple, and easily recognizable Realistic and use appropriate color (optional) where needed

10. Colored visuals are set in greyscale for black-and-white reproduction 11 12.

Line drawings are not shaded to avoid poorly and blotchy printed pagess Ilustrations of animals and people are facing inside the page iltustrations of a process involving separate steps or actions have individual pictures or frames

3.

plied Note: At least 9 cnterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. ompu

Recommendation: (Please put a check mark () in the appropriate box.) Minor revision. This material is found compliant to the minimum requirements of all four factors.

Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, ano

Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

Major revision. This material is non-compliant to the requirements in one or more tactor Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors with NO corrections.

/ We certity that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report are my / our

own and have been made without any undue influence from others,

Evaluators(s):

Signature(s): Date accomplished:

Individual Sum

mary R

eport T

eam's

Summ

ary Report

Summ

ary of Findings, C

orrections, an

d R

eview

fo

r the D

ep

Ed

-dev

elo

ped

Learn

ing

Reso

urc

e

Leam

ing

Area:

Grade L

evel: T

yp

e o

f LR

:

Title

Acco

mp

lish th

is Su

mm

ary

Rep

ort b

ase

d o

n th

e m

argin

al no

tes in th

e LR

an

d th

e find

ing

s gu

ided

by

the criterio

n item

s in the ev

aluatio

n

too

ls for co

nten

t, lan

gu

ag

e, a

nd

desig

n a

nd

layo

ut. F

or e

ach

ero

r fou

nd

, write ch

ron

olo

gically

the p

ag

e n

um

ber a

nd

parag

raph

or line

nu

mb

er w

here

it was s

een

. Pro

vid

e a

desc

riptio

n o

f the e

rror a

nd

ind

icate

wh

eth

er th

e fin

din

g is a

co

nte

nt, la

ng

uag

e, o

r

layo

ut y

pe o

f ero

r (Refer to

the leg

end

belo

w). W

rite specific reco

mm

end

ation

s on

ho

w to

imp

rov

e the erro

rs fou

nd

. Pro

vid

e a final

reco

mm

en

datio

nb

ase

d o

n th

e d

ecision

mad

e o

n th

e accom

plish

ed ev

aluatio

n to

ols fo

r con

tent, lan

gu

age, a

nd

desig

n a

nd

layo

ut.

esig

n a

nd

Rem

ark

s (To b

e acco

mp

lished

by

the

development team

) P

aragraph L

ine / P

ag

e

Nu

mb

er (in

chronological o

rder)

Brie

f

Description

of E

rors

l T

ype o

f S

pecific

Reco

mm

en

datio

ns fo

r Im

pro

vin

g th

e

Erors/F

indings/Observations

Findings/

Ob

serv

atio

ns

No

t Imp

lem

en

ted

Im

plemented (Reasons/Justifications)

Erro

r

Legend: T

yp

e of E

ror: (C

for C

on

tent, L

for L

anguage, DL

for D

esign & L

ayout)

Oth

er F

indings: (Wnite ad

ditio

nal c

om

men

ts a

nd

recom

men

datio

ns n

ot captured in th

e ev

aluatio

n to

ols used.)

Fin

al Reco

mm

end

ation

: (Please put a ch

eck

mark () in th

e appropriate box.)

Minor

revision. Th

is material requires m

inor revision in the th

ree (3) focu

ses. Rev

ision

base

d o

n th

e reco

mm

end

ation

s in

clud

ed in th

is summ

ary report form

an

d L

R w

ith marginal n

otes m

ust b

e im

plemented.

Majo

r e

visio

n. T

his material requies m

ajor revision in at least one (1) focus. Revision b

ased on th

e recomm

endations in

clud

ed in th

is summ

ary report form

an

d L

R w

ith marginal n

ote

s mu

st b

e im

plemented.

Fo

r field

valid

atio

n. T

his m

aterial is fou

nd

compliant to all factors in th

e three fo

cu

ses w

ith NO

corections

(Please sig

n b

elow

an

d a

t the b

ack of each

prev

iou

s pag

e.)

1/W

e c

etify

that th

is sum

mary

of c

ore

ctio

ns (s) a

re m

y/ o

ur o

wn

an

d h

ave b

een

mad

e w

itho

ut a

ny

un

du

e in

fluen

ce from

oth

ers.

Evaluators/R

eviewers (s):

Signature(s): D

ate

acco

mp

lished

:

Referen

ces:

1] Learning R

eso

urc

e M

an

ag

em

en

t an

d D

evelo

pm

ent (LR

MD

S) Stan

dard

s

2] Regional M

em

o N

um

ber 3

6, s

. 20

20

- R

egional Learning C

on

tinu

ity T

ask

s an

d G

uid

elin

es

3] Co

ntin

uo

us Im

provement (CI) M

anu

al

4] Insights gained from

serie

s of trainings a

tten

ded

on

IM/LM

Developm

ent

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education

Reglon V DIVISION OF CAMARINES SUR

EDITORS' NOTESS

Module Writer: School/District:

GRADE/QUARTER MODULE NO. / TITLE MELC CORRECTIONS MADE

Signature over printed name of the Editor/Validator

Date

Address: Freedom Sports Complex, San Jose, Pil, Camarines Sur Email: deped.camsura deped.gov.ph Website: www.depedcamsur.com Phone No.: (telefax) 8713340