Educator Evaluation SystemSalem Public Schools

All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage

Forms may be downloaded

Hard copies will be available for all staff for the start of school

Go to the SPS Website

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

5 Step Evaluation Cycle: Rubrics

10

Part III: Guide to RubricsPart III: Guide to RubricsPages 4-5Pages 4-5

Rubric is used to assess

performance and/or progress

toward goals

Rubric is used to analyze

performance and determine ratings on each Standard and

Overall

Every educator uses a rubric to self-assess against Performance

Standards

Professional Practice goals – team and/or

individual must be tied to one or more Performance

Standards

Evidence is collected for

Standards and Indicators; rubric should be used to provide feedback

• Administrators

•Instructional Leadership*•Management and Operations •Family & Community Partnerships •Professional Culture •Teachers

•Curriculum, Planning & Assessment* •Teaching All Students (Instruction)*•Family & Community Engagement •Professional Culture

•* Indicates a “power standard” - Educators and leaders MUST be rated Proficient in these standards in order to receive an overall summative performance rating of Proficient.

Know the Four Standards

The New Standards

DESE Forms (Appendix A of Section II)

a.Educator Tracking Sheet

b.Self-Assessment Form

c.Goal-Setting Form

d.Educator Plan Form

e.Educator Record of Evidence Form

f. Educator Collection of Evidence Form

g.Formative Assessment Report Form

h.Formative Evaluation Report Form

i. Summative Evaluation Report Form

j. Educator Response Form

The Rubrics: Superintendent/ Administrators / Teachers - Section III

a.Appendix A - Superintendent Rubric

b.Appendix B - Principal Rubric

c.Appendix C - Teacher Rubric

d.Appendix D - Specialized Instructional Support Personnel

8

Multiple Sources of Evidence Inform the Summative Performance Rating

9

Educators will eventually earn two separate ratings:

Summative Ratin

g

Exemplary 1-YEAR SELF-

DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN

2-YEAR SELF-DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN Proficient

Needs Improvement DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN

Unsatisfactory IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Low Moderate High

Rating of Impact on Student Learning(multiple measures of performance, including MCAS Student Growth Percentile and MEPA

where available)

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Summative Rating

Exemplary 1-YEAR SELF-

DIRECTED GROWTH

PLAN

2-YEAR SELF-DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN Proficient

Needs Improvement DIRECTED GROWTH PLAN

Unsatisfactory IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Low Moderate High

Rating of Impact on Student Learning(multiple measures of performance, including

MCAS Student Growth Percentile and MEPA where available)

Handout - Educator Evaluation Process: Procedures for Educators: Teachers and Specialized Instructional Personnel

Each of the five steps are charted over the course of a year

Dates, Resources and Actions are delineated

This chart outlines the process of evaluation of licensed educators who will be evaluated by principals, asst. principals, directors, and coordinators

Step I of Annual Cycle: Self-Assessment

September 4-15, 2012

Key Issues to be Addressed: Determine the appropriate educator plan (see handout) for each staff member AND who will evaluate each teacher

Review Forms and Rubrics

Using hardcopies of the Self-Evaluation Form and the appropriate educator rubric, teachers will independently complete the self-evaluation form

Step II of Annual Cycle: Analysis, Goal Setting and Development

September 15-30, 2012

Refer to Appendix B - Setting SMART Goals and show video (optional)

Teachers develop a minimum of one Student Learning Goal and one Professional Practice Goal

S M A R T Goals are...

Specific / Strategic

Measurable

Action-Oriented

Rigorous/ Realistic/ Results-Focused

Timed and Tracked

Step II of Annual Cycle: Development, Analysis and Goal Setting (continued)

October 1-15, 2012

TeachPoint Training to be provided for all staff (Aug. 15th “Train the Trainer” - trainers present to staff )

Teachers will transfer hardcopy information on the Self-Evaluation and Goal Setting forms to the TeachPoint software format

Educators develop plans

Evaluators weigh in and approve the plans. Plans are developed using TeachPoint

Follow steps as outlined on the Educator Evaluation Process chart

Step III of Annual Cycle: Implementation of the Plan and Collection of Evidence

October 2012 - May 2013

Both educator and evaluator begin the process of collecting evidence

Evaluators conduct observations and walk throughs, and review multiple products of practice, e.g. district determined assessments, portfolios, lesson plans, course work, etc.

Educators document how they are working towards meeting their SMART goals and collect ongoing evidence of having met the four standards

Step IV of Annual Cycle: Formative Assessment

January - February 2013

The evaluator assesses the educator’s progress on attainment of goals and progress on achievement of the four standards

The evaluator completes the Formative Assessment Report Form (note the difference - Formative Evaluation Form)

Step V of Annual Cycle: Summative Assessment

May - June 2013

Based upon the collected evidence, the evaluator determines a rating for the educator on each of the four standards and determines and overall rating

Remember the impact of the “power” standards

Frequently Asked Questions

Who will be evaluating me?

What’s my educator plan?

What part do I play in my own evaluation process?

How do I address concerns I may have about comments made in observations, walk-throughs, formative and/or summative assessments?

Table of Contents - Part II of the School Level Implementation Guide

Common Questions.......................................................page 21

Definition of Plans.........................................................page 24

Educators Serving in More Than One Role.............. page 30

Change in Plan After the Formative Assessment......page 47