ee-times oct 27

Upload: sophia-song

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    1/60

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    2/60

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    3/60October 24 , 2011 Electronic Engineering Times 3

    CONTENTS OCTOBER 24, 2011

    OPINION

    4 Commentary: Where arethe jobs?

    58 Last Word: Steve Jobssecret success: Wi-Fi

    NEWS OF THE TIMES

    7 ARMs tips big-littlestrategy for multicore

    10 HP, Hynix target memristorlaunch in 2013

    12 Bob Swanson on whylinearand Linear

    still rocks

    16 Apple sales come up short

    COVER STORY

    18 Chip counterfeit case

    uncovers U.S. policy flaw

    INTELLIGENCE

    24 Inside IMEC

    DESIGN + PRODUCTS

    Global Feature:

    Designing for auto safety

    33 Processor strategies

    34 Benchtop EMI scans

    40 SW-intensive auto systems

    42 Electrical systems

    44 Planet Analog: Spice analysisof front-end RL drive for ECG

    EE LIFE

    53 Pop Culture: On jobs, layoffs

    57 Drive for Innovation: Are yououtraged yet?

    24An UBM Electronics Publication(516) 562-5000; Fax: (516) 562-5325Online: www.eetimes.com

    Vice President, UBM Electronics

    PUBLISHER

    David Blaza(415) [email protected]

    EDITOR IN CHIEF

    Junko Yoshida(516) 232-7835

    [email protected]

    NEWS DIRECTOR

    George Leopold(516) [email protected]

    EXECUTIVE EDITOR/EDITOR IN CHIEF, EE TIMES EDGE

    Nicolas Mokhoff(516) [email protected]

    ART DIRECTOR

    Debee Rommel(516) [email protected]

    COMPUTING, MEDICAL DEVICES EDITOR

    Rick Merritt(408) [email protected]

    EDITOR,www.eetimes.comDylan McGrath

    (415) [email protected]

    EDITORIAL DIRECTOR, EE LIFE

    Brian Fuller(415) [email protected]

    EUROPE

    Peter Clarke, LONDON; EUROPEAN NEWS DIRECTOR(011) 44 7767 865593 [email protected]

    Anne-Franoise Pel, PARIS EDITOR(011)33 6 87 16 87 52 [email protected]

    Colin Holland, LONDON EDITOR(011) 44 20 8319 1324 [email protected]

    INDIA

    K.C. Krishnadas, EDITOR [email protected]

    CONTRIBUTORS

    David Carey, END-SYSTEMS ANALYSIS(512) 338-3654 [email protected]

    R. Colin Johnson, TECHNOLOGY

    (971) 570-4162 [email protected] Schweber, ANALOG DESIGN(781) 839-1248 [email protected]

    Ismini Scouras, NEW PRODUCTS(347) 312-3162 [email protected]

    COPY DESK

    Diana Scheben, CHIEF COPY [email protected]

    Susan Rambo, COPY EDITOR(415) 947-6675 [email protected]

    ART/PRODUCTION

    Mara Cruz, ART DIRECTOR, [email protected]

    SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

    (800) 577-5356; Fax (847) 763-9606,www.subscribeeetimes.com

    CUSTOMER SERVICE

    PO Box # 3609Northbrook IL 60065- 3257Postage Due account number - [email protected](847) 559-7597

    UBM llc

    Pat Nohilly, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENTAND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

    Marie Myers, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, MANUFACTURING

    Copyright 2011 All Rights ReservedPrinted in the USAUBM plc, 600 Community Drive,Manhasset, N.Y. 11030

    EE Times (ISSN#0192-1541) is published 20 times a year (once in JAN, JULY, AUG, DEC; twice in FEB, MAR, APR, MAY, JUNE,

    SEPT, OCT, NOV) by UBM llc, 600 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 and is free to qualified engineers and managers

    involved in engineering decisions. One year subscription rates for others: United States $280; and Canada $324. Return unde-

    liverable Canadian addresses to APC Postal Logistics, LLC, P.O. Box 503 RPO W Beaver Cre, Rich-Hill ON L4B 4R6. Registe red

    for GST as UBM llc. GST#R13288078, Customer Number 2116057, Agreement Number 40011901. Annual air mail rates to

    Europe/Mexico, Central/South America, Africa $449; Asia, Australia and New Zealand $518. Mail subscription with check or

    money order in US Dollars to EE Times, 600 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 Circulation Dept. Periodicals postage paidat Manhasset, N.Y. and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER Send address changes to EE Times, P.O. Box 2164, Skokie, IL

    60076. Please address subscription, inquiries, editorial copy and advertising to EE Times, 600 Community Drive, Manhasset,

    N.Y. 11030. Copyright 2011 by UBM llc. All rights reserved.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    4/604 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    COMMENTARY

    In an op-ed piece for the New YorkTimes, Susan Hockfield, president of theMassachusetts Institute of Technology,spelled out the challenge, starting:

    The United States became the worlds

    largest economy because we invented prod-

    ucts and then made them with new

    processes. With design and fabrication

    side by side, insights from the factory floorflowed back to the drawingboard. Today, our most

    important task is to restart

    this virtuous cycle of inven-

    tion and manufacturing.

    MITs president believesmanufacturing has thepower to fuel a U.S. recov-ery. But Im not sure thematter is so clear-cut.

    EE Timeshas been cover-ing the global electronicsfor almost 40 years, and inthat time weve all wit-nessed the mass exodus ofmanufacturing facilitiesoverseas. The exodus certainly hasntstopped at mere manufacturing; off-shore production has ultimately led tooffshore innovation, with many compa-nies investing in design centers andR&D facilities outside the United Statesthat attract and nurture talented design

    engineers abroad.When a U.S. high-tech companystarts logging more revenue from over-

    seas markets, it feels justified in trim-ming its U.S. workforce. The explana-tion is always the same: We need tooperate in local markets to understandthose markets needs. We are a globalcompany; we need to design locally andmanufacture locally.

    The global label is being used as a get-out-of-jail-free card. Companies remain

    beholden to their customers in the glob-al markets and to theirshareholders back home.The one constituency towhom they are no longerbeholden is their engi-neers and other workersin the States, even thoughthey remain U.S.-basedcompanies.

    How can we break thecycle?

    Returning to Hock-fields op-ed piece, itshould be noted that shequalifies what she meansby manufacturing:

    To make our economy grow, sell more

    goods to the world and replenish the

    work force, we need to restore manufac-

    turingnot the assembly-line jobs of the

    past, but the high-tech advanced manu-

    facturing of the future.

    Specifically, the MIT president advis-es that we hang our hats on advancedmanufacturing that relies on the mar-

    riage of science and engineering in cut-ting-edge fields.

    Now were getting somewhere.We at EE Timesdont pretend to have

    all the answers; far from it. But in thesearch for cutting-edge fields thatcould create advanced manufacturingand engineering jobs, we may be able tohelp. Since April 2004, EE Timeshasbeen compiling and regularly revising alisting of emerging startups informallyknown as the Silicon 60.

    The Silicon 60 includes startupsinvolved in semiconductor technolo-gies for analog circuits, memory, logic,power, microelectromechanical systemdevices, optoelectronics, EDA software,foundry manufacturing, semiconductor

    production equipment, electronic sub-systems, displays, packaging and mate-rials. EE Timesselects the companiesbased on a mix of criteria, includingtechnology ingenuity, market focus,maturity, financial position, investmentprofile and executive leadership.

    The Silicon 60 list presents a cross-section of excellence in the global elec-tronics industry, where continuoustechnological innovationcoupledwith new business modelshas drivengrowth and given birth to new ideas,

    new companies and, as a consequence,new jobs.

    EE Timeshas come out with a specialSilicon 60 Career Issue (http://e.ubmelectronics.com/Silicon60/index.html),offering insight into dozens of hot com-panies at which you might be temptedto seek employment. We report onavailable jobs and the skill sets required(please note that not all of the listedcompanies have openings). The reportincludes viewpoints from venture capi-talists on the current startup landscapeand poses five questions anyone shouldask before joining a startup.

    Its not the whole answer to the jobcrisis. But the companies on our list arecommitted enough to good old ingenu-ity that theyunlike, say, Congresshave put their money where theirmouths are.

    Happy hunting. p

    By Junko Yoshida (junko.yoshida@ubm.

    com), editor in chief of EE Times.

    lJOIN THE CONVERSATION

    http://tiny.cc/y7z8s

    Where are the jobs? Thats the question of theyear. Its easy to blame the President, Congressand Wall Street, and indeed, in one way oranother, theyre all complicit. My addition tothe rogues gallery would be those big high-tech companies in the United States that are

    sitting on hoards of cash but neither hiring norinvesting.

    Where are the jobs?

    We shed light

    on jobs incutting-edgefields

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    5/60

    MORE NEW TECHNOLOGY

    PRODUCTS ADDED DAILY.

    AND SHIPPED THE SAME DAY.

    We are thrilled to announce the coming together of element14 and Newark into one powerful entitythe all-new element14.

    We will continue to provide the great products and personal service were known for, plus a significant new product

    expansion, and much more. The vision is a single destination that offers an unprecedented range of technical data, innovative

    tools and services, meaningful community and expert engagement, and the best component shopping experience ever.

    Learn more about our combined vision at www.newark.com/together

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    6/60

    MUX

    MUX

    VOUT_

    1

    VOUT_

    2

    VOUT_

    3

    VOUT_

    N

    POWER

    REGULATORSPWR IN

    ACTUATOR CONTROL/

    VALVE CONTROL

    4mA TO 20mA COMMS

    SENSOR AMP

    AMP

    TEMPERATURE

    FLOW

    PRESSURE

    ADC ISOLATION

    SENSOR

    DAC ISOLATIONSYSTEM

    INTERFACE

    SYSTEM CONTROLLER/

    PROCESSOR

    REF

    REF

    AMP/

    DRIVER

    AMP

    BUFFER

    BUFFER

    From industry-leading data converters and amplifiers to patented signal isolationtechnologies, ADI has the products and system-level expertise to optimize your

    automation and control system performance.

    Designed to innovate,built to last.

    Process controlsolutions from ADI.

    Recent Product Innovations

    AD5755-1: First 16-bit multichannel control DAC with

    dynamic power control; 80% lower power consumption,

    75% lower net thermal rise. 4 more integration and

    2 more accuracy.

    AD5750: High performance output driver; current and

    voltage drive capability with user programmable ranges;

    3 accuracy improvement over competing products,

    with integrated diagnostics and fault detection features.

    ADA4091-4: Quad precision micropower op amp;

    rail-to-rail input/output; 12 V OVP @ 15 V supply;

    60% lower offset, 20 dB higher CMRR, 50% less current

    over existing solutions.

    ADuM3160: 12 Mbps/1.5 Mbps upstream-facing USB

    digital port isolator; reduces embedded controller board

    space, eases design. Class 3A contact ESD performance

    (5 kV); UL, CSA approvals.

    AD7606: 8-channel DAS with simultaneously sampling

    16-bit 200 kSPS ADC.10 V and5 V on 5 V supply.

    Each channel with input clamps and filter; 92 db + SNR.

    4- and 6-channel versions available.

    analog.com

    Signal processing ICs for reliable,efficient control systems.

    How can your design help to reduce energy consumption and

    improve plant efficiency? With application-optimized solutions from

    ADI. Whether in PLC, DCS, or temperature controller systems, our

    signal processing ICs enable more channels, in a reduced form

    factor, while effectively managing power and heat concerns. And

    because they come from ADI, you can be assured of rock solid

    performance and availability throughout the life of your design.

    Experience for yourself the products and resources that can make

    a difference at www.analog.com/PCinnovate.

    Circuit designs built and tested to ensurefunction and performance. Use a QR readerapp on your smartphone and watch video now.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    7/60October 24, 2011 Electronic Engineering Times 7

    OF THE TIMESNews

    ARM trots out little dog A7 processorBy Peter Clarke

    PROCESSOR IP LICENSOR ARMHoldings plc has revealed a power-effi-cient Cortex-A7 processor core that itsays is intended to be used alongside itstop-of-the-range Cortex-A15 as part of aheterogeneous power-driven multicorestrategy.

    The A7 is a dual-issue, eight-stagepipeline core that has been heavily opti-mized for power efficiency but supports

    the same virtualization and extendedaddressing as the A15. As a result, ARM(Cambridge, U.K.) expects partners to

    implement a big dog, little dog strate-gy so that cores are selected to run appli-cations based on the apps power effi-ciency needs.

    Alternatively, the A7 processor canbe used alone in single- or dual-coreinstantiations to power an entry-levelsmartphone for price-sensitive markets,ARM said.

    CEO Warren East, speaking at the

    U.K. launch of the A7, said he expectedmulticore chipswhich could be dual-core A15 plus dual-core A7to be in

    the market and powering smartphonesin 2013.

    The big-little strategy allows low-per-formance basic and always-on tasks tobe run on one or more A7 cores, to max-imize battery life, while tasks requiringgreater performance would migrate tothe A15. This dynamic core selectioncan be made transparent to the applica-tion software and middleware running

    on the processors, supported byadvanced ARM system IP, such as theAMBA 4 ACE Coherency Extensions.

    MULTICORE

    Paired with big dogA15, the A7 will let

    ARM partners pursue astrategy that trades

    performance for powerefficiency as the app

    warrants, CEO WarrenEast said at the launch

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    8/60

    NEWS OFTHETIMES

    The movement of tasks between pairedA7 and A15 cores is triggered by thesame system that drives the dynamicvoltage and frequency scaling that hasbecome traditional in leading-edge sys-tem chips, the company said.

    In a 28-nanometer process, the A7 isless than one-fifth the size of the Cor-tex-A8 in a 45-nm process, while provid-ing greater performance and muchgreater power efficiency, ARM said. Adual-core A7 processor at 28 nm wouldproduce about a 70 percent power sav-ings over a dual-core A9 processorimplemented in a 40-nm technology. Inother words, the A7 would consume

    about one-third the power needed bythe A9.

    ARM had two or three lead partnerson the development of the A7 and theassociated big-little strategy, East said,but he declined to identify them. Accord-ing to the company, ARM now has a

    BIG-LITTLE FOR GRAPHICS?

    As ARM Holdings plc rolled out its

    Cortex-A7 core and attendant big

    dog, little dog" flexible power/per-formance scheme last week, an

    ARM executive revealed that a simi-

    lar scheme was being considered

    for its graphics processor cores.

    We are looking at a little-big

    approach for Mali, said Peter Hut-

    ton, general manager of the media

    processing division, who was involved

    in the design of the Cortex-A7.

    At present, ARMs big-little

    scheme applies to the pairing of

    the A7 and Cortex-A15, allowing

    software to migrate between the

    cores based on the processing per-

    formance required.

    ARM's Mali T-604 graphics

    processor supports the OpenCL

    parallel programming environment

    and the notion of applying the GPU

    to parallelizable general-purpose

    processing tasks. Hand-coding and

    manual partitioning currently have

    to be done to break out code that

    is suitable for running on a GPU.

    The T-604 includes four shader

    cores, each of which contains two

    arithmetic pipelines, one texturing

    pipeline and one load/store unit.

    The four shaders share a coherent

    L2 cache, an MMU, a tiler and a job

    manager. The job management

    block is a key component because

    the shaders are multithreaded; the

    job manager can dynamically move

    threads among the shaders. Thusthere is already power/performance

    scalability at the thread level inside

    the Mali T-604.

    In that regard, one could consid-

    er the A7, A15 and Mali T-xxx,

    which are likely to be implemented

    monolithically, as a set of resources

    that software should harness opti-

    mally based on a set of defined

    parameters, most notably minimum

    latency and minimum power con-

    sumption. Peter Clarke

    Cortex-A15 vs. Cortex-A7 Cortex-A7 vs. Cortex-A15

    performance energy efficiency

    Dhrystone 1.9x 3.5x

    FDCT 2.3x 3.8x

    IMDCT 3.0x 3.0x

    MemCopy L1 1.9x 2.3x

    MemCopy L2 1.9x 3.4x

    The same system thatdrives dynamic voltage

    and frequency scalingtriggers task movementbetween paired cores

    Performance and energy comparison of the Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15.

    Power consumption vs. performance for an A7 and A15 pair showingdynamic voltage and frequency scaling points.

    Overdrive condition

    HighestCortex-A15operatingpoint

    Cortex-A15

    Cortex-A7

    Highest Cortex-A7 operating point

    Lowest Cortex-A15 operating point

    LowestCortex-A7operatingpoint

    Performance

    Power

    8 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    Source: ARM

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    9/60

    With 42 years of service excellence and proven experience, Future Electronics is bringingthe best of its past success to take a creative new look at growing your business for the future.

    Weve got a refreshed outlook and an invigorated spirit to support your businessfrom the ground up.

    The only thing were changing is for the better.

    The New Future ElectronicsPutting the Future into Todays Business

    www.FutureElectronics.com 1-800-FUTURE-1

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    10/60

    NEWS OFTHETIMES

    10 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    SEVILLE, SPAIN The memristortwo-terminal nonvolatile memory that

    Hewlett Packard Co. has had in devel-opment since 2008 is on track to beon the market and taking share fromflash memory within 18 months,according to Stan Williams, senior fel-low at HP Labs.

    We have a lot of big plans for it.Were working with Hynix Semicon-ductor to launch a replacement forflash in the summer of 2013 and also toaddress the solid-state drive market,Williams told an audience here at therecent International Electronics Forum.

    A spokesperson for HP said there wasno definitive product road map yet formemristors but confirmed that HP hasa goal to see memristor products by theend of 2013.

    The memristor metrics pertainingto energy to change a bit, read/write

    times, retention and endurance are socompelling that flash replacement iseffectively a done deal, Williams said.So in 2014/2015, well be going afterDRAM and, after that, the SRAM mar-

    ket, he said, suggesting confidencethat the memristor would become a

    so-called universal memory.Williams declined to detail the

    process technology, memory capacity ormemory-effect material with which HPand Hynix are working, though he saidthe first commercial offering would bea multilayer device. He said the part-ners had been running hundreds ofwafers through a Hynix full-size faband were very happy with the results.

    When challenged over the cost of thetechnology, a potential barrier to itscompeting against flash, Williams said,On a price-per-bit basis, we could be anorder of magnitude lower in cost onceyou get the NRE [nonrecurring engi-neering cost] out of the way.

    From theory to productThe memristorits name is a combina-tion of memory and resistorwasoriginally a theoretical two-terminaldevice whose electrical behavior wasderived by Leon Chua in 1971. Nearly40 years later, in 2008, HP researcherspublished a paper in Nature that tiedthe hysteretic I-V characteristics of two-

    terminal titanium oxide devices toChuas memristor prediction.

    What we found is that moving a fewatoms a fraction of a nanometer can

    change the resistance by three orders ofmagnitude, said Williams. In fact,many nanodevices have inherent mem-resistive behavior.

    HP has amassed some 500 patentsaround the memristor over the pastthree years. Williams also acknowl-edged, however, that phase-changememory, resistive RAM (RRAM) andother two-terminal memory devices areall memristor-type devices, and thatmany other companies are working onmetal-oxide RRAMs. Samsung now hasa bigger research team working on thetechnology than HP, he said.

    Williams touted the crosspointnature of the memristor memoryswitch or resistive RAM device as pro-viding a memory capacity advantageover flash. Whatever the best in flashmemory is, well be able to double that,he said.

    Implication logic and synapseWilliams said HPs technology meets or

    exceeds the flash performance in allcategories. Read times are less than

    MEMORY

    HP, Hynix target memristor launch in 2013By Peter Clarke

    wave of semiconductor licensees eagerto use the A7 core. Chip vendors Broad-com, Freescale, HiSilicon, Samsung,ST-Ericsson and Texas Instrumentsare listed as supporting the technology,as are system and software concernsCompal, LG Electronics, Linaro, OpenKernel Labs, QNX, Red Bend and Sprint.

    We took the A15 to market lastyear because we needed to push theperformance envelope, said East. Butpower efficiency is the most impor-tant thing for ARM. The A7 is the mostefficient core yet.

    Power-efficiency-driven selection of

    resources has been used before, forexample in the area of graphics, but notfor general-purpose processor cores,said Tom Cronk, deputy general manag-er of the processor division.

    The Cortex-A7 processor occupiesless than 0.5 square millimeter using a28-nm process technology and providesuseful performance at about a 1.2-GHzclock frequency in both single- andmulticore configurations.

    Used as a standalone processor, theCortex-A7 will deliver sub-$100 entry-level smartphones in the 2013-2014time frame that will offer processing

    performance equivalent to that oftodays $500 high-end smartphones,according to ARM.

    While the A7 is aimed initially atsmartphones, East said the big-littlestrategy would be applicable in otherareas. He predicted that power-drivenresource allocation would eventually bedeployed in consumer electronics andany area in which complex processingmust coexist with power efficiency.

    Tapeouts including the Cortex-A7 areexpected in the first half of 2012, withsystems-on-chip and products based onthem to follow in 2013, East said. p

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    11/60

    2011 Renesas Electronics America Inc.

    Dramatically reduce power consumption and

    increase battery life with Renesas RL78 microcontrollers.With the RL78 Snooze mode, your system can monitor analog signals

    and handle communications, all while the CPU remains inactive.

    Snooze Mode enables operationof A-to-D and Serial port (UART,CSI) while the CPU is inactive

    CPU only switches to Run Mode

    when results are outside a setlimit (voltage range or serial portreception condition)

    Achieve True Low Power withRL78s Snooze Mode

    Run SnoozeMODE MODE

    5.0mA 1.04mA

    RL78 Snooze Mode

    Low Current in All Modes

    Run/Active Mode: 66A per MHz

    Halt Mode: 0.57A (RTC, LVD)

    Stop Mode: 0.31A (LVD)

    Wide Operating Voltage

    1.6V to 5.5V operating range includinganalog peripherals

    Low Voltage Detect (LVD)

    Ultra low power: 0.08A

    Extensive Scalability

    20 to 128 pins 2KB to 512KB

    Outstanding Performance

    41 DMIPS at 32MHz

    True Low Power Platform

    Take a Snooze Today!Register to qualify for a

    Free RL78 RenesasDemonstration Kitwww.renesas.com/RPBRL78G13/b

    Operating current example:Savings up to 80% (A-to-Dconversion)

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    12/60

    CALL IT CULTLIKE, and LinearTechnology wont take offense. Thecompanys commitment to analog isall-consuming. Its hundreds of analoggurus give concrete form to the tenetsespoused by its founders. And for the

    faithful who gathered at the San JoseConvention Center on Oct. 22 for Lin-ears 30th anniversary bash, the celebra-tory anthem was, Linear Rocks.

    Executive chairman Bob Swanson,who co-founded Linear in 1981 with

    Bob Dobkin, was a featured speaker atthe gathering. In an interview withEE Timesbefore the event, Swansonsaid his message would be that Linearisnt a company with a few geniusesat the core, surrounded by thousands

    NEWS OFTHETIMES

    10 nanoseconds, and write/erase timesare about 0.1 ns. HP is still accumulat-ing endurance cycle data at 1012 cycles,and retention times are measured inyears, he said.

    The memristor also has simplicitygoing for it, Williams said. It uses mate-rials that are already common in theworlds wafer fabs, making the manu-facture of CMOS-compatible devices arelatively straightforward process.

    That raises the prospect of addingdense nonvolatile memory as an extralayer on top of logic circuitry. Wecould offer 2 Gbytes of memory per coreon the processor chip. Putting non-volatile memory on top of the logicchip would buy us [the equivalent of] 20years of Moores Law, said Williams.

    Further out, Williams said, the mem-ristor could be used for computationunder a scheme called implication logic

    in a fraction of the area consumed inCMOS by Boolean logic. In addition, amemristor device is a good analog ofthe synapse in brain function, the HPresearcher said.

    As for HPs memristor business mod-el, Williams stressed that the companywould not be getting into the semicon-ductor components business but wouldinstead seek to commercialize and thenlicense the technology to all comers. p

    Texas Instruments

    Analog Devices

    Maxim Integrated Products

    National Semiconductor

    Linear Technology

    STMicroelectronics

    Intersil

    ON Semiconductor

    Sanken

    Fairchild Semiconductor

    Others

    Total Market

    2376

    3495

    260

    393

    278

    384

    5849

    7524

    1530220986

    526

    715

    534

    699

    841

    1369

    602

    886

    1674

    2290

    1265

    1813

    1097

    1418CY2009

    CY2010

    Market share rankings for standard analog IC suppliers, 2009-2010Revenue, $ millions

    Source: Gartners Annual Semiconductor Market Share Compilation, 2010, published in March 2011

    Bob Swanson on why linearand Linearstill rocksBy Junko Yoshida

    ANALOG

    12 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    13/60

    888-837-8772www.rohde-schwarz-scopes.com

    Try the industrys most accurate and reliable digital oscilloscope.

    Is your scope lying to you?Find out.

    Rohde-Schwarz-scopes.comIf youre not using a new Rohde & Schwarz digital oscilloscope,your scope may not be giving you honest answers.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    14/60

    NEWS OFTHETIMES

    of helpers. This is a company with afew helpers, like myself and others inthe middle, surrounded by hundredsof geniuses.

    Its the rare executive who publiclyspeaks his mind. But Swanson, whopassed the CEO torch to Lothar Maier in2005, didnt mince words during ourinterview, which touched on his ownhistory, including his 30 years at Linear;the company and its competitors; andthe changes that have swept the indus-try over the course of his career.

    When Swanson and Dobkin startedLinear, the so-called digital revolutionwas just getting under way, and digitaltechnology was threatening to do away

    with all things analog. Swanson lostsleep over the thought that hed starteda company in a crowded sectoralready hosting 50 or more competi-torswhose best days might alreadybe behind it.

    In the early days, I remember goinginto Bob [Dobkins] office every day, ask-ing him if the talk about the digital rev-olution was true. And Bob, every time,assured me that analog would not goaway, Swanson recalled.

    Today, nothing amuses Swanson

    more than an analyst or reporter whoproclaims analog suddenly hot, or achip giant with a bloated portfolio thatpromises to reinvent itself as an analogpowerhouse. Such pronouncements arevindication of the decisions he andDobkin made back in 1981, when, as heput it, all we knew was analog.

    Swanson recalled the time his teamdid a teardown on a Hewlett-Packardlab instrument that had been touted forits digital signal processing capability.Inside the HP box, the teardown teamfound one DSP and 92 analog parts. Bythe time Swanson turned over the man-tle to Maier, analog was again the indus-trys darling. After 30 years, the biggestsurprise for me was that the digital rev-olution turned out to be a friend of ana-log, he said.

    The second surprise for Swansonand further vindication of the choicesmade by Linearwas that many in theanalog business today have embracedthe idea of high performance analog.

    That was the marketing term weinvented at Linear when we were devel-oping precision analog ICs such as op

    amps, Swanson said, We had to askourselves what it was that we wereafter. We identified that we were com-mitted to high-performance analog, andwe decided to callit what it was.

    Steve Ohr, analyst for analog andpower semiconductors at GartnersTechnology and Service ProviderResearch group, said Linears strategyhas always been to stick with standardmultimarket building blocksampli-fiers, data converters, power manage-ment ICsbut design and build thekinds of parts whose specifications (typ-ically speed, precision and/or low pow-er consumption) are so finely tuned

    that competitors find those specs diffi-cult, if not impossible, to duplicate.Its strategy of skimming the very

    high end of the standard analog partsmarket has made Linear successful andis still valid today, Ohr added.

    Rewinding the tapeBefore co-founding Linear, Swansonworked for Transitron, Fairchild andNational Semiconductor. I workedfor the companies when they were attheir best, Swanson noted, adding

    that the experience had imbued himwith the spirit of winning rather thanjust surviving.

    In 1960, Transitron had $60 million insales and was the second biggest chipcompany, after Texas Instruments,according to Swanson. I knew I wasworking for a hot company becausewhenever I went to a trade show, as soonas somebody noticed Transitron on myname tag, hed want to recruit me.

    Several years into Swansons tenureat Transitron, Fairchild came courting.He took Fairchilds offer, having decid-ed that Transitron didnt treat peopleright; they behaved [as if] they had anendless pool of engineers coming into replace you.

    Fairchild was an innovative compa-ny, said Swanson, but it wouldnt putup money fast enough to seed thegrowth. In 1968, as Fairchild wasimploding and key personnel were leav-ing to found startups, Swanson landedat National, where he started out as a

    manufacturing guy. After completing atour of duty at Nationals fabs in Scot-land and in Germany, he was put in

    14 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    Scope Lie #1

    Your digital

    scopes

    bandwidthWhen it comes to small signal

    bandwidth, engineers need a

    gradual signal roll-off to avoid

    seeing a lot of ringing and

    overshoot in the time domain.

    Todays digital scopes employ

    very sharp, high-order frequency

    responses that trade minimum

    sampling rates for maximum

    bandwidth. The result is highovershoot and ringing when

    measuring typical digital signals.

    Try the scope that tells the truth by

    utilizing slow roll off to eliminate

    overshoot and ringing.

    Discover how your digital scope

    may be misrepresenting results at

    www.rohde-schwarz-scopes.com

    888-837-8772

    0

    -5

    -10

    -15

    -20

    -25

    -30

    -35

    -40

    108

    109

    1010

    Rohde & Schwarz

    Ideal Gaussian response

    Other scopes

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    15/60

    charge of Nationals flagship analogbusiness. It was an exhilarating experi-ence, said Swanson.

    But by the late 1970s, analog was abusiness to milk at National, whichhad begun buying into the myth thatall problems electronic would one daybe solved digitally. National startedmaking watches, calculators and com-puters on a board, Swanson said, andwas trying to take on the Japanesein memories. I didnt like the odds.National was also taking on Intel inmicroprocessors. I didnt like mychances there either.

    Swanson acknowledged that Nation-als waning interest in analog had beena factor in his decision to leave, but healso cited his disappointment withwhat he called the companys ridicu-lous management style. Under amatrix management system, Nationalmanagers had their hands on every-thing, but nobody was responsible forone thing, Swanson recalled. Theywere even changing my process at a fab,driving my yield to crash.

    Swansons experiences at his three

    earlier employers have informed hismanagement philosophy and are evi-dent in Linears continued use of spe-

    cialized fabrication facilities (anunusual posture in the fabless era,Ohr noted), its emphasis on R&Dinvestment and its commitment toits engineers.

    Asked what makes Linear unique,Ohr cited its engineering culture, inwhich individual creativity is encour-aged and applauded. And at a timewhen even analog companies like Inter-sil are responding to Wall Streets prod-ding to dump their fabs, Ohr said,Linears bipolar and specialized CMOSfacilities are knobs they can turn toextract ever more performance fromsuch devices as low-power 16-bit dataconverters with 100-MHz sampling rates;

    lithium-ion battery charge controllersfor the automotive battery market; andthe Micro-Module dc/dc converters,which provide high-current outputs fordensely populated server cards.

    The Micro-Module parts, Ohr added,address one of the sweet spots of thevoltage regulator market: point-of-loadconverters for big computers and enter-prise-level communications systems.

    Independent thinkerDuring Linears first decade, the buzz

    around the digital revolution madethe financial community skeptical ofanalog. At every analyst meeting onWall Street, Id spend the first 10 min-utes explaining why analog was notdead, then the next 10 minutes onwhat the future held for Linear, saidSwanson.

    Hes the first to point out that heisnt a visionary, noting, I didnt havea vision for smartphones or MP3 play-ers. But Linear did see the impor-tance of portable, battery-poweredproducts for things like medical equip-ment or analytical tools. This was waybefore portable PCs became popular.The company capitalized on its earlyrecognition of the significance of mak-ing standard functions more power-efficient as devices shrink andintegration rises.

    Thats not to say its all been smoothsailing. When the dotcom bubbleburst in 2001, Linears sales sank byhalf, to $500 million, triggering dramat-

    ic action to reset the companys direc-tion by 2005.During that period, Linear took the

    October 24, 2011 Electronic Engineering Times 15

    Scope Lie #2

    Your digital

    scopes noise

    specificationTodays digital scopes only provide

    a 5 or 10mV/division setting and

    use a digital zoom to get down to

    a 1mV/division setting. This tactic

    significantly increases noise while

    lowering the accuracy. As a way to

    reduce the noise, some oscilloscopes

    limit bandwidth on low volts per

    division settings, while others do notoffer the 1mV/division setting at all.

    Try the scope that has a true,low noise performance and highly

    accurate 1mV/division setting.

    Discover how your digital scope

    may be misrepresenting results at

    www.rohde-schwarz-scopes.com

    888-837-8772

    The big surprisewas that the digitalrevolution turnedout to be a friend ofanalog Bob Swanson

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    16/60

    NEWS OFTHETIMES

    typical cost-cutting measures, but thebig decision was to unhinge ourselvesfrom the consumer electronics busi-ness, Swanson said. Given the CE sec-tors rise in influence during the pastdecade, that decision might seem coun-terintuitive. But what we learned isthat consumer electronics manufactur-ers always care about price per chip;they dont care about quality. Put moreaccurately, they arent prepared to paymore for quality.

    Say theres consumer market demandfor a complex analog chip that fits in asmall space. Linear might get there firstand improve its chip with each new gen-eration, but in a few years, some com-

    petitor will field a similar chip at halfthe price. The race is always to the bot-tom, and once dragged there, theres noway for us to protect our IP and continuethe business, Swanson said.

    So Linear left the CE market to oth-ers and refocused on the industrial andautomotive segments. When the glob-al economic crisis hit in late 2008, wedidnt panic, said Swanson; the com-

    pany stayed the course, focusing onmedium- to long-term business. By2011, Swanson said, we kind of madeour case by maintaining a 30 percentto 40 percent profit margin.

    Between 2002 and 2010, according toGartner numbers cited by Ohr, the com-pound annual growth rate of the stan-dard analog IC market in which Linear

    16 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    Scope Lie #3Your digital

    scopes

    update rateDigital scope manufacturers

    boast update rates of 1+ million

    waveforms/sec, but this spec

    excludes measurements and mask

    testing. These demanding scope

    measurement tests slow down

    the update rate of most digital

    oscilloscopes. When conducting

    a mask test at lower update rates,

    per second could take anywhere

    from minutes to hours.

    Try the scope that maintains

    extremely high waveform update

    rates while performing a mask

    test, and locates the error in

    less than 30 seconds.

    Discover how your digital scope

    may be misrepresenting results at

    www.rohde-schwarz-scopes.com

    888-837-8772

    ApplesquarterlysalescomeupBy Dylan McGrath

    FINANCIAL

    DESPITE RECORD SALES of MacPCs and iPads, Apple Inc.s sales for thequarter ended Sept. 24 fell short of ana-lysts consensus expectations.

    Apple (Cupertino, Calif.) last weekreported sales for its fiscal fourth quar-ter of $28.27 billion, down about 1 per-cent from the third quarter and up 39percent from the fourth quarter of 2010.

    The company posted a quarterly netprofit of $6.62 billion, or $4.64 pershare, down 9 percent from the previ-ous quarter and up 54 percent com-pared with the year-ago quarter.

    Analysts were looking for more.According to Yahoo Finance, a groupof 44 analysts surveyed had expectedApple to report sales for the fiscal fourthquarter of $29.45 billion on average.

    Gross margin for the quarter was 40.3percent, down from 41.7 percent in theprevious quarter and up from 36.9 per-cent in the year-ago quarter, Apple said .

    For the fiscal year, also ended Sept.

    24, Apple reported sales of $108.25 bil-lion, up 66 percent from fiscal 2010. Thecompany reported net income for the

    Analysts had beenexpecting fiscalfourth-quarter sales

    of $29.45 billion

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    17/60

    plays was 10.5 percent; Linears CAGRwas 13.1 percent.

    Swanson is proud to go against WallStreets wisdom. We have a disciplinenot to take a business for the sake ofgrowing sales, he said, adding thatonce you start selling more at lowermargins, you find your R&D becomingoverhead that needs to be cut. Linear is

    the most profitable company in the ana-log market, said Swanson. But we havenever promised to Wall Street that weare the fastest-growing company.

    Linear has also worked to keep itshead count stable. Our No. 1 goal ismaintaining a healthy business, whichin turn creates job security and a cul-ture of loyalty, Swanson said.

    That culture, he believes, will help

    Linear battle the two-headed giant of themerged resources of Texas Instrumentsand National. Innovation is not an armsrace, he said. TI may have 2,500 to4,500 analog circuit designers now,whereas I have only 250 to 300. But atLinear, we have innovative analogdesigners who are truly analog gurus.

    Gartners Ohr, however, said TIsacquisition of National should be a con-cern for Linear. The future of analoglies with broadline companies likeTexas Instruments, with the engineer-ing and manufacturing resources to doboth standard analog and application-specific analog. This assessmentincludes ON Semiconductor, STMicro-

    electronics, even Infineon.Further, Ohr noted, If you dont wishto be big, then you need to accept animage of yourself as a niche player, abillion-dollar-boutique.

    But maybe thats what Linear wants.We have never been committed toprofitless growth, Swanson said.

    If thats not a refreshing attitude,what is? p

    October 24, 2011 Electronic Engineering Times 17

    Scope Lie #4

    Your digital

    scopes

    analog triggerMost analog and digital scopes

    utilize separate circuits for trigger

    and waveform acquisition. These

    circuits have different bandwidths,

    varying sensitivities and diverse

    characteristics which can cause

    trigger jitter.

    The R&SRTO digital oscilloscopedoes not split the captured signal

    into a trigger circuit and acquisition

    circuit, virtually eliminating trigger

    jitter and enabling you to trigger

    Try the scope with the digital

    trigger, that triggers on the same

    waveform you see on the screen.

    Discover how your digital scope

    may be misrepresenting results at

    www.rohde-schwarz-scopes.com

    888-837-8772

    Sell more at lowermargins, Swansonsays, and your R&Dbecomes overheadthat needs to be cut

    hort

    year of $25.92 billion, up 85 percentover fiscal 2010.

    Apple said it sold 17.07 millioniPhones in the fiscal fourth quarter,representing unit growth of 21 percentover the year-ago quarter. The companyalso said it sold 11.12 million iPads dur-ing the quarter, a 166 percent unitincrease over the year-ago period, and4.89 million Macs, a 26 percent unitincrease over the same quarter of 2010.Apple sold 6.62 million iPods, a 27 per-cent unit decline from the year-agoquarter, the company said.

    Apple expects sales for the current

    quarter (the first quarter of its 2012 fis-cal year) to grow to about $37 billionand expects diluted earnings per share

    to reach about $9.30. Apples fiscal firstquarter includes 14 weeks, instead ofthe typical 13 weeks, the company said.

    Last Monday, Apple reported it hadsold more than 4 million iPhone 4Shandsets within three days after theproduct officially launched on Oct. 14.

    By contrast, it took Apple more than70 days to sell the first 1 million origi-nal iPhone handsets when the productwas launched in 2007.

    Customer response to iPhone 4Shas been fantastic, we have strongmomentum going into the holiday sea-son, and we remain really enthusiastic

    about our product pipeline, Tim Cook,Apples chief executive officer, said ina statement.p

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    18/6018 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    Poison in the veinsBy Bruce Rayner

    WHEN YOU TYPE www.visiontechcomponents.cominto your

    browser, up pops a cheerful page that tells you, Sorry! Thissite is not currently available.Thats because last September, the feds shut the component

    broker down, arrested owner Shannon Wren and administra-tive manager Stephanie McCloskey, and charged the pairwith conspiracy, trafficking in counterfeit goods and mailfraud for knowingly importing more than 3,200 shipments ofsuspected or confirmed counterfeit semiconductors into theUnited States, marketing some of the products as militarygrade and selling them to customers that included the U.S.Navy and defense contractors.

    McCloskey pleaded guilty to the conspiracy charge last

    November in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbiaand cooperated with the government. Wren died of an appar-ent drug overdose in May.

    Last month, details of the case against McCloskey wererevealed in the 78-page memorandum in aid of sentencingthat the government filed with the district court. Thememorandum offers a rare glimpse into how a rogue brokeroperating out of a house on a quiet residential street inClearwater, Fla., was able to dupe the system, put countlessinnocents at risk and compromise national security fornearly five years.

    COVER STORY

    Chief of Staff

    Executive Secretariat

    Military Advisor

    SECRETARY

    DEPUTY SECRETARY

    MANAGEMENTSCIENCE &

    TECHNOLOGY

    NATIONAL

    PROTECTION

    & PROGRAMS

    POLICY GENERAL COUNSELLEGISLATIVE

    AFFAIRS

    PUBLIC

    AFFAIRS

    INSPECTOR

    GENERAL

    Chief

    FinancialOfficer

    FEDERAL LAW

    ENFORCEMENT

    TRAINING CENTER

    DOMESTIC

    NUCLEAR

    DETECTION OFFICE

    U.S. COAST

    GUARD

    OPERATIONS

    COORDINATION

    & PLANNING

    CITIZENSHIP &

    IMMIGRATION

    SERVICES

    OMBUDSMAN

    CIVIL RIGHTS &

    CIVIL LIBERTIESHEALTH AFFAIRS

    INTELLIGENCE &

    ANALYSIS

    CHIEF

    PRIVACY

    OFFICER

    COUNTER-

    NARCOTICS

    ENFORCEMENT

    INTERGOVERNMENTAL

    AFFAIRS

    FEDERAL

    EMERGENCY

    MANAGEMENT

    AGENCY

    U.S. SECRET

    SERVICE

    U.S. IMMIGRATION &

    CUSTOMSENFORCEMENT

    U.S. CITIZENSHIP &

    IMMIGRATIONSERVICES

    U.S. CUSTOMS &

    BORDERPROTECTION

    TRANSPORTATION

    SECURITYADMINISTRATION

    Organizational chart for the U.S.Department of Homeland Security.U.S. Customs and Border Patrol fallsunder DHS jurisdiction.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    19/60

    How a chip counterfeiting case

    exposed a potentially fatal flawin the U.S. governments abilityto keep fake parts out of the

    defense pipeline

    Damage done by VisionTech

    The U.S. government has estimated the damage caused to 21semiconductor companies by VisionTechs importing of counterfeitchips over a multiyear period. The dollar values are based largelyon the manufacturers suggested retail pricing for the legitimateversions of counterfeit parts seized by Customs and Border Patrolin 35 separate incidents over more than three years.

    Advanced Micro Devices $34,900.00

    Altera $7,611.00

    Analog Devices $75,580.66

    Cypress Semiconductor $33,446.00

    Freescale $40,021.00

    Infineon Technologies $10,036.00Intel $100,889.50

    Intersil $1,857.30

    Linear Technology $32,018.75

    Maxim $1,596.34

    Mitel $2,645.93

    National Semiconductor $5,943.80

    NEC $24,842.07

    Peregrine Semiconductor $2,640.00

    Philips Electronics $1,639.50

    Renesas $2,400.00

    Samsung Electronics America $77,165.00

    STMicroelectronics $18,619.21

    Texas Instruments $92,899.58

    Toshiba $2,424.00

    Xilinx $22,235.76

    Total $591,411.40Source: Governments Consolidated Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing and Motion

    for Downward Departure Pursuant to USSG. 5K1.1, filed with the U.S. DistrictCourt in the District of Columbia on Sept. 9, 2011, and the U.S. Departmentof Justice.

    Due to the type of counterfeit goods sold, the industries to

    which sales were made, and the multitude of military, com-mercial and industrial applications into which these devicesmay be placed, defendant McCloskey did her part to set a tick-ing time bomb of incalculable damage and harm to the U.S.military, U.S. servicemen and -women, the government, all ofthe industries to which VisionTech sold goods, and con-sumers. She has effectively helped to release a poison into theveins of interstate and international commerce, U.S. Attor-ney Ronald Machen wrote in the memorandum.

    The memorandum recommended McCloskey serve a four-and-a-half-year prison sentence and pay restitution to thetrademark owners for damages estimated at close to $600,000.The trademark owners named in the memorandum are a veri-

    table whos who of the semiconductor industry.Of the estimated 3,263 shipments of semiconductors

    imported by VisionTech between December 2006 and Septem-ber 2010, only 35 were confirmed as containing counterfeitsand seized at the border by U.S. Customs agents. Those 35shipments contained a total of nearly 60,000 counterfeit ICs,according to the governments memorandum.

    The 3,228 shipments that were not seized made their wayinto the U.S. electronics supply chain through sales Vision-Tech made to more than 1,100 buyers in virtually everyindustry sector. Many of VisionTechs customers were otherbrokers, who resold the parts. While some of the counterfeitswere caught during manufacturer testing, hundreds of thou-sands, if not millions, of counterfeit parts are potentially stillfloating around in the supply chain or, worse yet, insideequipment thats being used today.

    One of the counterfeit shipments contained fake parts soldto BAE Systems, which makes identification friend-or-foe (IFF)systems for the Naval Air Warfare Centers Aircraft Division.BAE purchased 75 devices from a broker who had bought theparts from VisionTech. The contractor had the chips tested at athird-party testing facility, which identified them as counter-feits. If those chips had found their way into an IFF system onboard a Navy vessel and the system had failed, the shipsdefenses would have been seriously compromised.

    Another case involved the sale of 1,500 counterfeit Intelflash memory devices to Raytheon Missile Systems forincorporation in the Harm Targeting System (HTS), which is

    Source : Test imony o f S IA p res ident Br ian Toohey be fo re the House Commi t tee onHomeland Secur i t y Subcommi t tee on Overs igh t , I nvest i ga t ions and Management

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    20/6020 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    COVER STORY

    installed on F-16 fighter planes to identify and track enemyradar systems. Raytheon installed the flash chips on 28 cir-cuit boards destined for HTS modules. The boards immedi-ately failed. After testing nine of the flash devices, Raytheonconcluded the parts were all counterfeit.

    Flaw in the systemBut this story is not about VisionTech. Its about howthe VisionTech case exposed a flaw in the U.S. governmentstactics for catching counterfeit components at the border.Specifically, its about an interpretation of the U.S. TradeSecrets Act by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) thatprevents the agency from sharing detailed information abouta counterfeit part with the semiconductor company whosename is on the component. CBP is one of the Department ofHomeland Securitys (DHS) largest agencies.

    Customs agents at U.S. borders are allowed to hold a ship-

    ment of suspected counterfeit parts for 30 daysthe so-calleddetention phaseto determine whether they are indeedcounterfeits. After 30 days, agents either have to seize theshipment formally or release it to the intended recipient.During the detention phase, CBP must disclose to the ownerof a trademark the following information, if available: (1) thedate of importation; (2) the port of entry; (3) a description ofthe merchandise; (4) the quantity involved; and (5) the coun-try of origin of the merchandise, according to a written state-ment that CBP provided to EE Timeson Oct. 5.

    The problem is that CBPs so-called redaction policy limitsthe information that can be shared with trademark owners. Inaccordance with that policy, Customs agents since mid-2008

    have been taking photos of chips, blacking out the markings onthe package and sending the touched-up images to chip manu-facturers, according to the Semiconductor Industry Association.

    The CBP statement explains that its position is foundedon the view that information protected by the Trade SecretsAct cannot be provided to a third party until after seizure.

    In furtherance of CBPs position that no Trade Secrets Act-protected information is to be released until after seizure,CBP ... determined that any indicators, such as bar codes andserial numbers, that might inadvertently disclose such infor-mation were to be removed or obliterated before providing asample to a trademark owner.

    Of course, its the very bar codes and serial numbers oblit-erated by CBP agents that chip companies would normallyuse to determine whether a detained chip is real or fake.Before 2008, when CBP was still providing unaltered photos,chip companies estimate they were able to resolve almost85 percent of CBP requests for confirmation of whether adetained chip was legit or counterfeit.

    So how are chip makers expected to help CBP agents catchcounterfeit parts if they cant see the markings on the chips?And how does CBP reconcile its requirement to provide a

    In a word, bad. And its getting worse.

    Counterfeit computer hardware,

    including chips, was one of the top

    commodities seized in 2010 by U.S.

    Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    Seizures in the category were up fivefoldlast year over 2009, ICE reported.

    Between 2007 and 2010, ICE

    collaborated with U.S. Customs and Border

    Patrol (CBP) on more than 1,300 seizures

    that collectively involved 5.6 million

    counterfeit semiconductor devices. The

    fakes bore the trademarks of 87 Asian,

    European and North American chip

    companies. More than 50 seized

    counterfeit shipments were falsely marked

    as military- or aerospace-grade devices.

    A 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce

    report on counterfeit electronics in the

    defense industry corroborated the trend.

    Based on responses from component

    manufacturers, the Commerce study

    reported an increase of more than 150

    percent in the number of counterfeit parts

    showing up in military and governmentapplications between 2005 and 2008.

    Counterfeiters range from negligent

    brokers who dont test the parts they

    import to criminals intent on deceiving

    their customers. As the VisionTech case

    shows, counterfeiters can make a lot of

    money by buying cheap fakes and

    reselling them for 10, 100 or even 1,000

    times more than they paid for them.

    And the counterfeiters are getting

    bolder. In June, $852,000 worth of

    counterfeit SanDisk portable memory

    chips were discovered and seized by

    federal agents at the Port of Long

    Beach/Los Angeles, according to the Los

    Angeles Times . CBP agents found the

    chips hidden inside 1,932 karaoke

    machines shipped from China.

    For manufacturers, its essentialto have a formal and rigorous process

    for inspecting and testing suspect

    components. The components

    themselves, shipping documentation and

    packing labels must be inspected as the

    boxes come off the receiving dock.

    Suspicious parts should be tested with

    X-ray inspection systems and high-

    powered microscopes. If needed,

    companies should have the chips

    decapped either mechanically or

    chemically to check the die markings.

    Bruce Rayner

    HOW BAD IS THE COUNTERFEITING PROBLEM?

    Its one of the most perplexingissues Ive ever dealt with. Its anational security issue, and aclear and present danger ...We need to solve this problem,

    period, and soon. Brian Toohey, president of theSemiconductor IndustryAssociation. The SIA insiststhat CBPs redaction policyhinders chip makers abilityto identify counterfeitparts during the 30-daydetention period forincoming shipmentsof suspected fakes

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    21/60

    mouser.comSemiconductors and electroniccomponents for design engineers.

    mouser.com

    Proof that the

    company youkeep says a

    lot about your

    company.

    Come to Mouser for whats next from these industry leaders.

    Authorized Distributor

    Mouser and Mouser Electronics are registered trademarks of Mouser Electronics, Inc. Other products, logos, and company names mentioned herein, may be trademarks of their respective owners.

    Scan Here toWatch Video

    AS9120ACertified Distributor

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    22/6022 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    COVER STORY

    description of the merchandise to the trademark holder withits policy of obliterating information on a photo?

    I dont understand whats behind this, said Jim Burger, a

    longtime Washington-based intellectual property attorneywho represents semiconductor companies. Theres zerothreat to CBP in disclosing the information on the surfaceof a chip to the trademark owner. The information is not con-fidential and is not covered under the Trade Secrets Act. Theyare just hands-down wrong.

    Indeed, CBP is unique in its interpretation of the TradeSecrets Act. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S.Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), among others,disclose detailed information to semiconductor manufactur-ers as part of their investigations of counterfeit cases.

    Its one of the most perplexing issues Ive ever dealt with,said SIA president Brian Toohey. Its a national security

    issue, and a clear and present danger.The VisionTech case confirms just how clear and present.

    CBP began sending semiconductor companies sanitizedimages of devices starting in June 2008, when VisionTechscounterfeit operations were in full swing, according to thegovernments memorandum. The government does notknow how many shipments destined for VisionTech mayhave been detained at U.S. ports but were released when anauthenticity determination could not be made by the trade-mark holder, U.S. Attorney Machen wrote in the governmentmemorandum on McCloskeys recommended sentencing.

    Given that CBP seized just 35 of the 3,263 shipmentsVisionTech made between 2007 and 2010, the number thatCBP could have detained and subsequently released becauseof a lack of authentication could have been anywhere fromzero to 3,228. Just one counterfeit VisionTech shipmentreleased into the supply chain as a result of CBPs redactionpolicy would have been one too many, several sources said.

    SIAs Toohey has made the argument publicly. On July 7,testifying at a hearing before the House Committee on Home-land Securitys Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations andManagement, he made the case for CBP to revert to its pre-2008practice of sharing unredacted photos of detained parts.

    Over the summer, letters on the topic were exchangedbetween members of Congress, the Homeland Security and

    Treasury secretaries, and CBP Commissioner Alan Bersin, whowas pressed to explain and possibly amend the redaction poli-cy. The latest salvo was fired on Oct. 4 by Chairman Jason

    Chaffetz and Ranking Member John Tierney of the NationalSecurity, Homeland Defense and Foreign Operations Subcom-mittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Govern-ment Reform. The committee has opened a formalinvestigation into the CBPs policies and procedures regard-ing importation of counterfeit semiconductors.

    We are concerned actions taken by CBP may serve to seri-ously undermine its ability to prevent the importation ofcounterfeit semiconductors, Chaffetz and Tierney wrote.Bersin was given until today, Oct. 24, to provide all docu-ments related to DHS and CBPs legal interpretation of theTrade Secrets Act as it pertains to CBPs redaction policy.

    We need to solve this problem, period, and soon, saidSIAs Toohey. The only way to do that is if industry and gov-ernment work together to quickly and accurately identifysuspected chips before they enter the country. The industrystands ready, as we always have, to stop suspect ICs at our

    borders by working collaboratively with CBP.The conflict will likely play out in one of two ways. In thefirst scenario, if Bersin refuses to budge on CBPs redactionpolicy, the only recourse would be for Congress to legislatea change in CBPs policy. It would have an ally in the Obamaadministration, which in March released a report on IPenforcement legislative recommendations that calls for Con-gress to give DHS authority to share information on suspectparts with rights holders during the detention phase. Rightsholders know their products better than anyone else and,thus, obtaining their assistance allows DHS, particularly itscomponent CBP, to more effectively identify and combatinfringing products, the report states.

    CBP, meanwhile, told EE Timesit had already submitted pro-posed legislative language to Congress that would give CBP theauthority recommended by the administrations report.

    The other scenario would be for Bersin to get over his con-cern about violating the Trade Secrets Act, pick up his pen andwrite a new directive that permits CBP to share unaltered pho-tos and samples of detained products with chip companies.

    Legislation would likely take some time. A CBP policy shiftcould be accomplished overnight. In light of the clear andpresent danger, logic would dictate the latter. p

    I dont understand whats

    behind this. Theres zero

    threat to CBP in disclosing the

    information on the surface of

    a chip to the trademark

    owner. They are just hands-down wrong.

    Jim Burger, a Washington-basedintellectual property attorney,on CBPs interpretation of theTrade Secrets Act and its resultantredaction policy

    Additional resources

    Ferreting out the fakes in the chip supply chain, EE Times

    http://tiny.cc/2z69l

    Hearing by the House Committee on Homeland Securitys

    Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations and Management

    http://tiny.cc/58uya

    Defense Industrial Base Assessment: Counterfeit Electronics,

    U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security,

    Office of Technology Evaluation, June 2010 http://tiny.cc/w3unv

    Obama administration white paper: Intellectual Property

    Enforcement Legislative Recommendations

    http://tiny.cc/k5eve

    Consolidated Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing and Motion for

    Downward Departure Pursuant to USSG 5K1.1, filed with U.S.District Court in the District of Columbia, Sept. 9, 2011

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    23/60

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    24/6024 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    Intelligence

    LEUVEN, BELGIUM The Interuniversity MicroelectronicsCenter recently hosted a press tour at its facilities to reveal

    IMECs goals for an office tower now under construction anda third fab planned for later in the decade. Along the way,IMEC researchers offered status updates on everything from450-mm wafers and extreme-ultraviolet lithography to ultra-wideband and 60-GHz wireless.

    IMEC CEO Luc Van den Hoveannounced plans to have a450-mm pilot line up and run-ning in 2015. Presumably, thatswhen IMEC believes a full line ofsemiconductor manufacturingequipment for 450-mm wafers

    including the long-awaited

    extreme-UV lithography sys-temsshould be available.

    A U.S. consortium looking todrive the 450-mm wafer genera-tion recently announced plans fora pilot facility in New York. Vanden Hove said the move did notsteal any of IMECs thunder orpotential business for plowing theway to such a capability.

    One group cannot solve all thechallenges of the 450-mm migra-tion, Van den Hove said, claimingthe U.S. announcement had notbeen a surprise and would have noimpact on IMECs plans. We haddetailed discussions with partners, fully knew their needs for450-mm wafers and had our plans worked out.

    Our 450-mm timetable is more conservative than whatothers have announced, yet it is the most optimistic schedulewe can think of, Van den Hove added.

    IMEC will start testing some 450-mm wafer tools as earlyas next year in its existing 300-mm facility, which wasexpanded just last year. A full 450-mm facility wont arriveuntil about 2015 and will cost at least a billion euros (about

    $1.38 billion), Van den Hove said.The good news is that IMEC has land available on its leafycampus for the new fab.

    The latest on EUV

    Kurt Ronse (below), IMECs director of advanced lithography,gave an update on his experiences with the ASML NXE 3100EUV lithography system (next page, right).

    The system was installed in IMECs 300-mm fab in Marchand uses a different light source (Ushio discharged-produced

    plasma) than the technology deployed inthe handful of other machines in usearound the globe. IMEC has been runningwafers through it since June and thus farhas gotten results down to 18-nanometerline widths.

    Throughput is the big issue. The systemcurrently only handles about five wafers an

    hour. Thats up from one wafer every threehours at the start, but it will take as long asnine months to get to the machines ratedthroughput of 60 wafers an hour, Ronsesaid. Going to 450-mm wafers and keepingthe throughputs the same will requirehigher scanning speeds and acceleration, sosome of the biggest challenges are in devel-oping that staging technology, he said.I dont expect that the first prototype450-mm wafer EUV scanners with reason-able throughput will be available before2015 or 2016.

    An even bigger hurdle, according to Vanden Hove, is getting a strong enough lightsource to handle the needed 100-wafer/hour

    throughput for commercial systems. At least two companiesare competing to deliver such components now, Van denHove said.

    Raising a towerand a budgetThe big local story at IMEC this year was the groundbreakingfor a 16-story office tower that will house 500 people andinclude some new labs.

    The Leuven TV news crew turned out to interview Van den

    Hove after the event (next page, bottom left), which attractedtechnorati from the area, including the manager of the localbranch of Alcatel-Lucents Bell Labs.

    Inside IMECBy Rick Merritt

    LEADING-EDGE RESEARCH

    Kurt Ronse

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    25/60October 24, 2011 Electronic Engineering Times 25

    A groundbreaking at IMEC drew thelocal press; the technorati came forresearchers updates on work with

    technologies like extreme UV

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    26/6026 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    INTELLIGENCE

    The Flanders minister for innovation,Ingrid Lieten, was on hand at thegroundbreaking ceremony and promisedthe government would increase itsinvestment in IMEC by as much as 200million euros by 2014. Thats a substan-tial boost from the governments currentcontribution of about 45 million euros ayear, but its still far short of the billioneuros IMEC estimates it will need to cre-ate a 450-mm pilot line by 2015.

    The mayor of Leuven, Louis Tobback,also voiced his support at the event.

    Indeed, the mood at the groundbreak-ing was upbeat, as a packed crowdof partners and local politicians gath-ered for speeches, a champagne toast

    and lunch.

    Where the rubber meets

    the road

    Energy harvesting has found whatcould be its first high-volume applica-tion, according to one IMEC researcher.

    All those tire pressure monitors man-dated in U.S. cars (and soon to berequired in new European and Japancars) currently use batteries, whichforce a return to the shop every three tofive years. No more, thanks to a proto-

    type SoC from IMEC that integrates thepressure sensor with a block to harvest

    energy from road vibrations. It turnsout potholes can be a good thing.

    IMEC researchers demonstrated theso-called smart tire (below left) in anonline video.

    The chip includes a small super-capacitor to store energy gathered fromroad vibrations. as well as a 315- to 434-MHz RF link to communicate tire sta-tus to the cars management system.

    The group expects next-generationparts will integrate other features, suchas electronic product IDs. Strain sensorsand accelerometers are also being con-sidered to monitor overall tire safety.

    So far, tire makers Pirelli and Conti-nental are showing interest, said Rob

    van Schaijk (left), who manages thesmart-tire program at IMEC.

    Ultrawideband redux

    Ultrawideband got creamed in the mar-ket a few years ago when it failed tomeet the data rates and costs expectedas the transport for wireless USB. Ahandful of startups went belly-up inthe aftermath of the hype.

    Now IMEC wants to bring the tech-nology back in a slightly different formfor a very focused application.

    Researcher Kathleen Philips (below)described an impulse-response versionof UWB for use in linking stereo head-sets to MP3 players and smartphones.

    The prototype 90-nm chip set thatIMEC has developed for the applicationpromises to deliver more throughputthan Bluetooth or ZigBee, with far lesspower consumption than Wi-Fi. The

    Kathleen Philips

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    27/60

    Arrow Electronics | Americas Components@arrownac arrowunplugged

    On your desktoparrownac.com/widget

    Onlinearrownac.com

    In person1-800-833-3557

    In your inboxarrownac.com/subscriptions

    EVERYTHING

    ELECTRONICS.

    Complete solutions.Innovative technology.

    More than 300 suppliers.

    Comprehensive engineeringand lifecycle services.

    Its who we are.

    Its what we do.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    28/6028 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    INTELLIGENCE

    group has written a paper describing its work that has beenaccepted for presentation at the International Solid-State Cir-cuits Conference in February. At the event, IMEC will haveworking demos to show the chips 1-Mbit/second bandwidthat 6-mW power consumption, Philips promised.

    If all goes well, in 2013 the team will show a version of thechip set for use in indoor location-based services.

    Lighting up fish brainsResearchers at the new Neural Electronics Research Flanders(NERF) center at IMEC aim to unlock secrets about how thebrain works. They hope their fundamental research will yieldnew treatments for brain disorders that today afflict millions.

    Researcher Cameron Wyatt (above left) took reporters on atour of the NERF center that included its extensive farm ofzebra fish (above right), which assist in the neural investiga-tions. Zebra fish embryos, it turns out, are wonderful subjectsfor studying living brains.

    NERF researchers expose the fish to certain tastes orsmells and then conduct fluorescent tests to observe which

    areas of their brains light up, as if shot through with ripplesof lightning, as they sense the chemicals and express specif-ic proteins (top left).

    Digital TV gets reconfiguredIMEC researcher Liesbet Van der Perre (below) has expandedher work in reconfigurable radio to digital TV, developing achip that can power TVs sold in any geography in the globe.Panasonic, Renesas and Samsung are partners in the so-calledgreen-radio program.

    Over the past months, flex-ibility is becoming a realrequirement to cope with newstandards, said Van der Perre.The first radios we built hadcost and power overheadssuch that some companiessaid they werent goodenough, but now the costs andpower have come down to beon par with, or in some caseseven better than, ASICs.

    The team is also working onreconfigurable chips for LTE,

    which is specified across a frag-mented set of spectrum bandsglobally. And it is developing

    Fish farmedat IMECsNERF centerare givingresearcherslike CameronWyatt insight

    into brainbehavior

    Liesbet Van der Perre

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    29/60

    OrCAD HAS APPS

    CircuitFitPerform early fit studies at

    the schematic level before youcommit to placement.

    Find in DesignQuickly search for common

    values across multiple schematicsand projects.

    ShapeUtilsSimplify the process of creating and

    editing shapes in PCB Editor.

    TestPoint AnnotatorSync testpoint placement between

    OrCAD PCB and Schematic.

    OrCAD PDF GeneratorsShare your designs withnon-CAD users through

    intelligent PDF generators.

    LabelTuneAutomatically adjust PCB Editor

    RefDes labels to match partorientation and size.

    Status DisplayAvoid errors with fully customizablevisual indicators of properties like

    production status and value.

    SymbolGenBuild and verify OrCAD schematicsymbols in a fraction of the time

    right from the component datasheet.

    CIP in CISInstant access to search and

    download component data formillions of parts inside OrCAD.

    Learn MoreScan the QR code to watch the

    OrCAD Capture Marketplace andApp Store movie.

    2011 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All rights

    reserved. Cadence, the Cadence logo, OrCAD,PSpice are registered trademarks of CadenceDesign Systems, Inc. All others trademarks arethe property of their respective holders.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    30/6030 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    INTELLIGENCE

    chip sets to handle both 5- and 60-GHzversions of next-generation Wi-Fistandards.

    Chips replace opticsFrancesco Pessolano (above) wants toreplace every piece of glass in visionsystems with silicon.

    The IMEC program manager hasbroad ambitions for his Nvision initia-tive. For example, he wants to replacebulky camera lenses with thinner digi-tal mirrors and filters in everything

    from consumer point-and-shoots tomedical endoscopes.

    Glass is actually pretty bad foroptics. For every four glass lenses youuse to focus, you need 20 more to com-pensate, so you end up with somethinglarge, he said.

    IMECs digital optics designs couldshrink a 550-mm camera lens down toabout 126 mm, he estimates. Prototypescould emerge by the end of 2012.

    Chips could also help shrink the sizeand cost of todays hyper-spectral imag-

    ing systems from table-sized equipmentthat costs as much as $50,000 to the sizeand cost of a consumer camera. Siliconalso can speed the processing by anorder of magnitude, Pessolano said,promising demonstrations in January.

    Looking way down the road, Pes-

    solano showed early demos of chip-based holographic systems that couldbecome alternatives to todays 3-DTVs. The monochrome demos showed3-D images of IMECs planned officetower as well as the IMEC logo (aboveand right).

    The holography demos captured lotsof attention at the press gathering, butthe researchers tempered the enthusi-asm by warning the technology is along way from market.

    IMEC proves chip prowessStephane Donnay, an IMEC programdirector, announced that the institutehad scored its first design-socket wins,having created three chips for ASMLsEUV scanners. The design wins are thefirst fruits of a program IMEC launchedlast year to make low-volume productsfor its partners.

    The institute will also transferdesigns to foundries if the productsmove to high volume sales.

    More design wins are in the works.

    IMEC chips successfully passed severalqualification audits this year, and theinstitute expects to ship silicon in 2012

    to five partners, Donnay said.The three chips done for ASML

    include two positioning sensors thathelp align and focus the NXE 3100 sys-tems reticle. The third chip senses EUVlight doses and will be designed into thenext-generation NXE 3300.

    The design win faced little com-petition. ASML is not expected tosell more than a handful of the pre-production EUV systems, so few compa-nies were interested in designingASICs for them.p

    PowerManagement

    Hall Sensors

    C1C2

    C4C3

    C5

    ClockGenerator

    VSS SDAADDR SCL

    VDD

    INTn

    RESETn

    VDDpI2C

    Interface

    ProcessingEngine

    ADCEasyPoint.AS5013 The Hall Sensor

    Technology behind the

    EasyPointTM Module Concept

    www.austriamicrosystems.com/5013

    Supports Full 360 Navigation

    High Reliability: Contactless Sensing

    Small Size: QFN 4 4 0.55 mm

    Low Power Mode: Down to 3 A

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    31/60

    >> Find out how LabVIEW can make you better at ni.com/labview/better 800 453 6202

    National Instruments. All rights reserved. LabVIE W, National Instruments, NI, and ni.com are trademarks of National Instruments.

    roduct and company names listed are trademarks or trade names of their respective companies. 2812

    NI LabVIEW

    Name

    Peter Simonsen

    Job Title

    Design Engineer,

    Embedded Software

    Area of Expertise

    Renewable Energy

    LabVIEW Helped Me

    Perform real-worldsimulations with total

    control of the application

    Latest Project

    Develop a test architecture

    for verification of wind

    turbine control systems

    LabVIEW makes me better because I can

    real-world systems

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    32/60

    The ITT Engineered Blocks symbol; and Engineered for life are registered trademarks of ITT Corporation. 2011

    Drawing upon nearly 100 yearsof interconnect excellence,

    ITT, Interconnect Solutionsrepresents a strong partner tomedical equipment manufactur-ers, bringing solutions to themarket which are truly Engineered forLife. We provide a diverse team of interconnect experts, dedicated tohelping our medical partners realize dependable and highly engineered solu-tions for their hospital, medical office, and home care applications.We understand the quality and reliability mandated by products within themedical market and our innovations and rich history corroborate our expert-ise in serving these markets with robust solutions. ITT offers a completeinterconnect capability -including new product families such as the industryleading MKJ Trinity, Quad Lock Connector, and Nemesis - tailored to addressthe needs of individual customers with the highest requirements.

    For specifications, technical drawings, and full line catalogs please visitwww.ittcannon.com.

    QLC Micro

    Cannon, VEAM & BIW

    When Life Matters

    Think about ITT.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    33/60

    THE CURRENT GENERATION ofmicrocontrollers provides the safety-critical developer a wide variety ofoptions when choosing products. Thevariety is perhaps most evident whenevaluating available processor safetystrategies for safety integrity. This is anarea where the best solution dependson the ability of the system developerto judge the strengths and weaknessesof the solution.

    When considering common solutionsfor safe processing, there are a few com-mon architectures across product offer-ings. Most available CPU safetysolutions can be classified as single core,single core with hardware checking,dual-core lockstep, asymmetric dualcore or symmetric dual core. These clas-sifications are illustrated in Figure 1.

    Watchdog-based solutions, thoughvaluable for program sequence and

    deadlock monitoring, cannot providesignificant diagnostics of processingand thus are not considered here.

    To begin our comparison, we mustestablish a few classes of evaluation cri-teria: software complexity, silicon com-plexity, safety analysis complexity andavailable performance for functionalsoftware execution.

    Software complexity measures theeffort needed to integrate safety mecha-nisms into application software. Siliconcomplexity expresses the on-die hard-ware cost. Safety analysis complexitymeasures the difficulty of performingsafety analysis. Finally, available per-formance measures how much CPUperformance is available to the applica-tion relative to a single CPU withoutany implemented safety constraints.

    Single-core CPU solutions are usedacross a wide range of products and arethe baseline for analysis.

    A single-core solution must rely onsoftware-based diagnostics and meas-ures such as multiple execution of safe-ty-critical code in order to achieve safetyintegrity, resulting in high cost to soft-ware complexity. Silicon complexity islow, as there is no specific overhead insilicon dedicated to safety support. Safe-ty analysis complexity is high, as it ischallenging to prove that the imple-mented software can detect all relevantfaults. This is particularly true for tran-sient faults, which temporarily canchange the state of a flip-flop or registerbut are cleared by subsequent softwareexecution. Available performance is lowbecause of the overhead of software-based diagnostics, which can easily con-sume more than 30 percent of the totalCPU performance. Redundant execution

    Karl Greb is the functional safety technologist for Texas Instruments Hercules

    family of safety-critical microcontrollers. He is currently participating in thedevelopment of the ISO 26262 standard as TIs representative on the US TAG

    and is also a member of the SAE Automotive Functional Safety Committee.

    Single core

    CPU CPU Checker CPU A CPU A0 CPU A1CPU BMasterCPU

    CheckerCPU

    Compare

    Diagnostic

    Single core

    with hardware checker

    Dual corelockstep

    Asymmetric dual

    core

    Symmetric dual

    core

    DESIGN PRODUCTS+

    Matching processor safety strategiesto your system design

    By Karl Greb

    GLOBAL FEATURE

    The right solution for thetargeted application can be different

    for every development team, evenwhen designing the same

    type of end equipment

    October 24, 2011 Electronic Engineering Times 33

    Figure 1. Visual representationof common CPU safety strategies.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    34/60

    of safety-critical code willfurther reduce availableperformance. TexasInstruments StellarisARM Cortex-M microcon-trollers implement a sin-gle-core CPU scheme.

    Single-core solutionswith hardware checkingaddress many of theissues of the single-coresolution by replacing themajority of softwaremeasures with continu-ously or periodically oper-ating hardware checkers.Such a solution tradesreduced software over-

    head for increased com-plexity of silicon. Safety analysis of thissolution is challenging. A lack of com-mon standards in design-for-safetymeans that the strategy of the hardwarechecker must be uniquely provedto each assessor. Available CPU per-formance is high, often with less than5 percent of the CPU overhead con-sumed for safety diagnostics. TIs Her-cules TMS470M ARM Cortex-M3microcontrollers are an example of asingle-core solution with periodic CPU

    checking by hardware.Dual-core lockstep is essentially a

    special case of a single-core solutionwith hardware checking. In a dual-corelockstep system, a partially or fullyduplicated processor core takes theplace of the CPU checking functionali-ty. Software follows a low-complexitysingle-core programming model withlittle to no software overhead for safetydiagnostics. Silicon complexity variesbased on implementation. Complexityranges from medium-complexity 1oo1D(single channel with diagnostic)

    schemes, where a single core is alwaysthe master core, to higher-complexity

    1oo2 (dual-channel) schemes whereeither core can act as master. The usershould take care to understand theimpact of additional failure modes pres-ent in more complex schemes. The lock-step concept is well-known in industryand trusted by assessors, reducing thesafety analysis complexity for the sys-tem developer. The vast majority ofCPU performance remains available forapplication usage, often approaching100 percent. TIs Hercules TMS570LS

    and RM4x ARM Cortex-R4F-basedmicrocontrollers are examples of 1oo1D

    34 Electronic Engineering Times October 24, 2011

    DESIGN PRODUCTS+

    Software Silicon Safety analysis Available Example TIcomplexity complexity complexity performance product family

    Single core High Low High Low Stellaris

    Single core Medium Medium Medium High Hercules

    with hardware TMS470Mchecking

    Dual-core Low Medium to Low High Hercules

    lockstep High TMS570 and RM4x

    Asymmetric Medium to Medium to Medium Medium to Concerto

    dual core high high high

    Symmetric Low High High Medium to OMAP4

    dual core high

    Source:TI

    IN THE EFFORT to eliminate bottlenecks in the designprocess and accelerate time-to-market, design teams haveturned to very-near-field electromagnetic interference scan-ning technology. Very-near-field EMI scanning lets design-ers measure and immediately display emissions profiles ona computer through an on-site benchtop system.

    The scan identifies both constant and time-based emis-sion sources. The real-time spatial and spectral graphs letdesigners immediately identify the specific location andspectral profile of the EMI problem. Or, conversely, the test

    might confirm that the design in its current form presentsno problem.

    Very-near-field testing allows board designers to pretestand resolve electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and EMIproblems without having to rely on results from a cham-ber. Generating test results in a chamber often results intime lags ranging from hours to days, as it usually requiresthe involvement of another department and a test engi-neer, and possibly travel to an off-site location.

    In the example shown in this article, the test first evalu-ated the emission profile of a board with the spread-spec-trum clock generation (SSCG) feature turned off. Thesecond set of test results evaluated the same board and chipwith the SSCG turned on. The results verified the efficacy

    of the new design, documented the benefits, accelerated

    Benchtop EMI scans accelerate time-to-marketBy Stphane Attal

    Stphane Attal is chief executive officer of Emscan

    (Calgary, Alberta), a bench solutions provider for

    magnetic near-field measurements. He has

    founded and served as CEO of multiple startups.

    Table 1. Comparison of CPU safety strategies for a high-safety-integrity design.

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    35/60

    NQB 1/4 Brick

    IBC Converter

    Highlights Industry leading power density

    Driven by CUIs patented

    Solus Power TopologyTM

    DOSA compliant pin-out

    Specifications720 W / 60 A output

    1/4 brick package

    36~60 Vdc input range

    Greater than 96% effi ciency

    smarter, faster, smaller

    Check out the latest addition to CUIs power line:

    720 W Novum Intermediate Bus Converter

    At CUI, our approach is to develop smarter, faster, smaller power modules. Whether its an embedded

    ac-dc power supply, a board level dc-dc converter, or a level V external adapter, we continuously strive to

    keep our power line, that ranges from 0.25 W to 2400 W, ahead of the curve.

    cui.com/power

  • 8/3/2019 EE-Times Oct 27

    36/60

    dual-core lockstep solutions.Asymmetric dual-core solutions use

    two processors of different hardwarearchitecture (heterogeneous multipro-cessing) to diagnose faults. Such solu-tions can achieve very high safetyintegrity, thanks to their ability todetect systematic issues in both CPUand software through diverse hardwareand software implementations. These

    should be selected with the main andchecker CPUs having similar perform-ance. If the performance delta is toolarge, it may not be possible to executediverse implementations of the targetapplication, effectively reducing thedesign to two single-core systems. Thesoftware complexity is medium to highbecause of the need to generate soft-ware for two platforms.

    Hardware complexity varies frommedium to high complexity, dependingon the CPU architectures chosen. Safetyanalysis complexity is medium. Whilethe system itself is complex, the tech-nique is well understood and acceptedin the industry. Available performancein a high-safety-integrity system ismedium to high with respect to the per-formance of a single master core. The

    36 Electronic Engineering Times Octob