eeeeeeeeesinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + e a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
AD-A14i 284 ON THE LINEAR STABILITY OF TIO-DIMENSIONALCBARIUM i/ICLOUDS I TH4E INVISCID CASE(U) NAVAL RESEARC LABI WASHINGTON DC S T ZALESAK ET AL. 38 APR 84 NRL-MR-53i2
UNCLASSIFIED F/G 4/1 NI
I EEEEEEEEE
![Page 2: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
L &, 12
am... ~ a m II)
,uut_ _-
7-_
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHARTNATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-I963.A
4.."E
•-U.
I'.,
.p.I
![Page 3: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
. ...- ...-
* ~ Lluk"M Stablt of Two-Dimensional Barium CloudsI. The- I oviscd
ST. ZAUMSKAND J. D. HUlA
GqAw~ d PmumDpaicaBreach
00
-I., --
MAI- M~ 'i ftF,
All
~,. **t*9--
Wn. 84 05 21 043
![Page 4: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
I.LASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEia REPORT SECU Rir TC .ASSiFiCATION lb R4ESTRICTIVE MARKrGS
002W SEC--RITY CL.ASSIFCATION AuT'.ORTV 3 OISTRiBUTION,AVAILABIL.TV OF REPORT
2t, OECL..ASSIF-CArtoN OOMF4ORAOiNO SCHEOWLE Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
4 ERF ORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBERiSI S. MONITORING GRGANIZATiON REPORT NUMBERIS)
NRL Memorandum Report 5312G& NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION [b. OFFICE SYMBOL Iii. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATCONN : P l' tapplicable,
Naval Research Laboratory jCode 47806. ADDRESS 61, S ite -it ZIP Coade, 7b- ADDRESS - I'^ State ad ZiP Code
Washington, DC 20375
S.NMOFFUNOINGiSPONSORING 181OFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION %I.,MSERORGANIZATION 'fapp.cableI
VDefense Nuclear Agency____________ __________
Sc ADDRESS Ct,ty. Slat, and ZIP Code, 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING NOS
PROGRAM PROJECT TASK I WORK UNIT
Washington, DC 20305 ELEMENT NO0 -40. NO NO
I - rEIn-d S~rlv .'41feaiu,62715H RR033-02- 47-0883-04II I LSI~lcdSp,,c .!aaiI~c~n,61153N 44
(See page ii) ______________________
I2 PERSONAL AUTMORISI
S. T. Zalesak and J. D. Huba~ MECVRDT FKPR--7;PG ON13& TYPE OF REPORT 13R1. TIME 8 CIEDO 1 4 AT OF REOT .Y,. Mo.. Day, 37PAECONInterim FROM 10183 TO17'I April 30, 1984 I37
IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NO0TATION This research wasv"insored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under* - ubtask S99QMX.BC, work unit 0010' ind work unit title "Plasma Structure Evolution."
17 COSATI CODES 15. SUBJECT TERMS (ConinuR~e on mwrew itnecesary and Identilfy by bioCk npnberl
FI ~ELD GROUP SuB. OR Barium clouds Bifurcation Structure Nuclear cloudsU-shaped curve Plasma structure Plasma clouds
19_1USTRACT 'Conm,. on II t ea.- and deittif, by blogl namborI
We examine the linear stability of the steepened backside of two-dimensional ionospheric barium clouds.We derive expressions for the growth rate of perturbations on these backsides which are functions of (1)the ratio M of the integrated Pedersen conductivity inside the barium cloud to that of the background
,*5;1%ionosphere; (2) the overall shape of the cloud; (3) the plasma density gradient scale length L of thesteepened backside; and (4) the perturbation wavenumber k. For sufficiently small kL, the growth time
-~ as a function of M traces out the "U-shaped curve" observed in previous studies.
KD)TIELECT
20 L OISTRIBUTION,AVAILABILlTY OP ABSTRACT 21 ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFCT
UNCLA55IFiFOUNLIPMITEO SAMF AS APT OTIC USERS Z: UNCLASSIFIED22. NAME Of RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUA. 221, TE LEPHONE NUMBER 22C OFFICES SYMBOL
ST.Zalesak (202 AP7EIIO7O Code 4780
-ar
1'... . - ' *- - P %. n - -:~~iim S~~~~.5 112 -!0 4* -- I '~
![Page 5: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
* -. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
11. TITLE (Include Security Clasification)
ON THE LINEAR STABILITY OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL BARIUM CLOUDSL THE INVISCID CASE
*-, .-%
N."
0€° °
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION CF THIS PAGE% ,..
S....:
![Page 6: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
-.~~Y T V~. -. . _ . . . . . ..' - -- . , k . - 1. .
. . .% , .4 .. % . " .
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 1
II. THEO RY ..................................................... 2
III. APPROXIMATING THE GROWTH RATE IN CASES WHERE THEDENSITY GRADIENT IS FINITE ................................. 5
IV. RELATIONSHIP TO THE U-SHAPED CURVE ......................... 6
V. CONCLUSIONS ................................................. 8
APPENDIX - DERIVATION OF THE E X B INSTABILITY GROWTH RATEFOR A DISCONTINUOUS INTERFACE ............................. 9
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................... 13
REFERENCES ..................................................... 21
JJustlficatLos-
/e'41 D eoibut' ..--
1 i.vailbilitY *o- _-
Avail ad/orS~poc l,
.-.'
.°°l
S5,!
"' ' " . - ... , . "" ''. '. - - ' - - -.-... -. " - ' " .'''''' . - • ""I'' - -'v .- ,""' ' .. ," " . v v " '
![Page 7: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ON THE LNEAR STABILITY OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL BARIUM CLOUDS1. THE INVISCID CASE
I. Introduction
The study of barium cloud phenomenology has been of interest to
ionospheric physicists for more than two decades. The release of barium in
• +- the ionosphere, followed by its rapid ionization, leads to a complex
S .-
Z4 interaction between the barium plasma and the background ionospheric plasma
° "in the presence of ambient electric and magnetic fields. One of the most
interesting phenomena observed is the structuring of the barium cloud: the
"fingering" or "striating" of the backside of the cloud. it is generally
believed that this structuring is produced by the E x B instability [Linson
and Workman, 1970]. A substantial research effort, both theoretical and
computational, has been devoted to understanding this instability and its
application to barium cloud structuring. The purpose of this paper is to
examine the linear stability of the steepened backside of two-dimfensional
barium clouds. We derive a relatively simple expression for the growth
rate of the perturbations on these backsides which are functions of () the
prmtrM which is the ratio of the inertdPedersen cnutvt
inerae Introduition
inside the barium cloud to that of the background ionosphere; (2) the shape
onof the cloud; (3) the plasma density gradient scale length L of the
steepened backside; and (4) the perturbation wavenumber k. For
sufficiently small kL, the growth time as a function of M traces out the
~"U-shaped curve" observed in previous studies [Linson, 1975; McDonald et
al__l, 1981; Overman and Zabusky, 1980].
The presene f abe remainder of this paper is as follows. In Section
II we derive the growth rate of a two-dimensional barium cloud, where we
approximate the steepened backside of the cloud as a discontinuity. In
Section Ita we relax this constraint and let the density gradient scale
length on the steepened backside be finite. In Section IV we relate our
results to the "U-shaped curve" of critical Reynold's number seen by
McDonald et al. 1981. Finally, in Section V we present our conclusions
and plans for future work.
Manuscrip approved Febrary 9, 1984.
5~'4
![Page 8: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
II. Theory
We are interested in deriving the approximate linear growth rate for
. perturbations applied to the steepened backside of an ionospheric barium
cloud. To achieve this we need several earlier results. The first is the
equation derived by Ossakow and Chaturvedi [1978] which describes the rise
velocities of plasma depletions in the shape of circular or ellipsoidal
cylinders in the presence of a gravitational field perpendicular to a
magnetic field B. It is simple matter to extend their equation to plasma
enhancements in the presence of an electric field Eo (i.e., barium
clouds). The second result we shall need is the equation for the linear
growth rate of the gradient drift E x B instability when the plasma profile
consists of a single discontinuity in plasma density. This result has been
derived by Huba and Zalesak [1983]. Finally, we shall need to know the
dependence of the growth rate on the plasma density gradient scale length
in the real-world regime between the two extremes of a density
discontinuity on the one hand, and a smooth density distribution, where
"local" theory should hold, on the other. For this information we draw
upon the work of Huba et al. (1982] and a suggestion of J.A. Fedder
[private communication, 1983].
Consider an idealized two-dimensional barium cloud consisting of a
uniform density inside of a "waterbag" of ellipsoidal shape, acted on by a
uniform external electric field E x in the presence of a magnetic field B
2z. Let the ellipse axis in the direction of E be denoted by b and the--0other axis by a. Let the ion density of the barium cloud be denoted by nb
and that of the background ionosphere be denoted by no . This situation is
depicted in Fig. 1. Then the results of Ossakow and Chaturvedi (1978] can
be extended to show that the total electric field E inside the barium
cloud is given by
E E (1)- -ol+MR
where
% R a/b (2).
2
_%,• , **o'* • "* -~~*~ . .. "% - --. ,...... ..-. . . . .. . .- -..- . .. . - % . " . ". ." . ...-, ": , ',, , : .,, . , :, .:. ,.. . 5.-. *,.,., . .5 : .:.A.2.: 5'*,.. .-... ... ........ . ..... :....
![Page 9: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
*~~~~; -77 '_ 7 * -~ - 7
- -nb + no/no (3)
Equation (1) is the first result we shall need for our analysis.
Now consider a one-dimensional barium cloud, infinite and invariant in
the x direction, which consists of a single jump in electron density from
nb + no to no at y = 0. That is, ne = nb + no for y < 0, and ne = no for
y > 0, where ne is electron density. Again we impose an electric field,
denoted here by E, aligned in the x direction. We then perturb the
* interface at y - 0 such that the position of the perturbed
interface n(x) is given by n - a cos kx where a is a small distance. This
situation is depicted in Fig. 2. It is shown in Huba and Zalesak 11983]
that this interface will grow in amplitude with growth rate y given by
k cE M - 1y. kB M+ (
Equation (4) was derived under the assumption that both Hall currents and
the inertial terms in the ion momentum equation are negligible. M is as
defined in Eq. (3). An alternative derivation of Eq. (4), due to the first
author, is given in the Appendix.
Consider a steepened barium cloud, as depicted in Fig. 3. If we
consider only the tip of the steepened backside, and we further consider
only perturbations of sufficiently long wavelength such that kL is small,
where k is the perturbation wavenumber and L is the characteristic scale
length of the density gradient on the backside of the cloud, then the
growth rate of these perturbations should be well approximated by Eq.
(4). However, note that the electric field E seen by the cloud is not the
externally imposed electric field Eo, but rather some smaller electric
field that is a result of the shielding effects of the two-dimensional
cloud. If we approximate our barium cloud as an ellipse as depicted in
Fig. 1, then Eq. (1) yields precisely this smaller electric field:
E -E I +R (5)- -o +MR(
. ; . ....K j ,. ..-... . .......... .., ..... .. .........-. ' '* * . . ...,.,.. ....... ,.,.. .
![Page 10: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Substituting this field into Eq. (4) we get finally
cEk o (M - 1) (R + 1)y k -B (M + 1) (MR + 1) (6)
For the special case of a circular shape (R - 1) we get
2k CE0 M-1 (7)B (M + 1)2
Equation (7) traces out an inverted "U-shaped" dependence of y on M,
which we relate to the "U-shaped curve" of McDonald et al. [1981] in
Section IV. The M dependence of y is given by (M - !)/(M + 1)2, which
maximizes at M - 3. A plot of this quantity, as well as its two factors,
(M - 1)/(M + 1) and (M + 1)-1, which are due to I-D instability and 2-D
shielding respectively, is shown in Fig. 4. Note that the falloff in y for
small M is due to 1-D instability effects alone, while the falloff in Y for
large M is due to 2-D shielding alone. Thus we conclude that the
resistance of 2-D high M clouds to bifurcation (see McDonald et al., 1981)
is due to 2-D shielding.
Equation (7) is very similar, but not identical to, an expression
derived by Overman and Zabusky [1980] for the case of a perfectly circular
"waterbag" model of a barium cloud. Their linearized analysis showed the
results of perturbing a circular cloud of radius ro by making radial
sinusoidal displacements of its boundary
r = r + E a cos m (8)0 m
where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius,
am is the perturbation amplitude, $ is the angle measured from the backside
of the cloud, and m is an integer (mode number). They found that
cE
3 am/at ( (2 r o M -2 am+l (9)0 (M + 1)
Note that if we write our perturbation (8) in terms of arc length ro0
multiplied by a wavenumber k then cos m6 - cos k r0 and
m/ro - k (10)
4
. " . .. - -.. .- ... . . ... . .. . ,. ... ., , . ..
![Page 11: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
.:.
making Eq. (9) yield the same "growth rate" as given by Eq. (7), except
that there is an am on the left side of (9) and an am+l on the right
side. Thus we have not totally recovered the results of Overman and
Zabusky [1980] for the circular waterbag, but the similarity is both
striking and encouraging. Furthermore, our formula Eq. (6) exhibits
several advantages over the Overman and Zabusky [1980] result. For one
thing, we do not have the ambiguity associated with using the term "growth
rate" to describe the rate at which mode m+1 supplies energy to mode m (see
Eq. 9). Equation (6) is a genuine growth rate in the usual sense of the
word. Also, precisely because we have derived Eq. (6) as the product of a
term involving global effects, i.e., the overall shape of the cloud, and a
term involving local effects, i.e., the densities and electric fields at
the steepened edge of the cloud, it is possible to generalize the results
to elliptical clouds (via the R dependence) and, more importantly, to the
case of a finite density gradient on the backside of the cloud, as we shall
see in Section III.
III. Approximating the Growth Rate in Cases Where the Density Gradient is
Finite
Let us return to Eq. (4). This equation was derived under the
assumption that the edge of the barium cloud represented a true
discontinuity in electron density; but real barium clouds consist of finite
gradients. How accurately does Eq. (4) represent the case of a sharp but
finite density gradient and how are we to treat the case where the density
gradient is not even sharp? The work of Huba et al. [1983) gives
numerically generated growth rates for a wide range of ratios of
perturbation wavelength to gradient scale length. However, we are
interested here in finding a simple, closed form expression. We propose
the following, after a suggestion due to J.A. Fedder [private
communication, 1983]
- k cE M - I kL € M + I (la)B M +1 M- 1
4 cE -L > M + 1y L ki> (11b)M I
5%.
*%
![Page 12: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
where L- 1 is the maximum value of the quantity - for the geometryn e y
.. . shown in Fig. 2 wherein we have replaced the discontinuity by a finite
transition length. Equation (lib) is the classical result for the gradie t
drift instability from local theory (see Linson and Workman [1970]). The
combined Eq. (11) agrees very well with the actual numerical results shown
in Huba et al. [1983] when allowance is made for the fact that the L used
in that paper differs from the one used here by a factor of 1.45. A
comparison is shown in Fig. 5.
Combining Eq. (11) with Eq. (1), we get our final expressions for the
growth rate of instabilities on the steepened backside of a barium cloud,
in the absence of diffusion:
- cE 1 i R1__Y. - c o M - 1 R + 1i M + I(1aB Mk1kL+1 (12a),,.B T + I M + I ' M - 1
"" " cE
Y . o L-1 R + 1 UL > M + iB MR + l" ' M- I
An obvious caveat to the above is that the perturbation wavelength X =
k/21 must be smaller than the total diameter of the barium cloud to have
the concept of a Fourier mode perturbation to make any sense at all.
We note that we have constructed our final expressions such that they
not only very closely recover the results of Overman and Zabusky [1980]
(for R = 1 and L 0 0, as previously discussed) but also accurately
reproduce the other known case of a one-dimensional plasma distribution (R
-0) for the entire range of kL.
N> :IV. Relationship to the U-Shaped CurveEquation (7), when viewed as an expression for y as a function of Mi,
yields a curve which maximizes at M - 3 and monotonically decreases away
from this value for all values of M for which our barium cloud represents a
true enhancement in electron density (1 4 M < -). In fact the growth rate
y is zero for M - 1 and M - -. The corresponding curve of a growth time
-a. y versus M minimizes at M = 3 and goes to infinity at M - I and M = -.
Curves of y versus . which exhibit this qualitative behavior have been
4F %•
:. 6
![Page 13: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
r ",. W. V W
dubbed "U-shaped curves" by several researchers. If one views barium cloud
bifurcation as a battle between the gradient drift growth rate y and
diffusive processes, then this U-shaped curve can be related to a similar
U-shaped curve which relates the amount of diffusion D needed to stop the
bifurcation of a cloud of a given radius ro, as a function of M. Let us
assume that the effect of diffusion is to contribute a term - k2D to the
growth rate. Let us further approximate our barium cloud as a cylinder (R
= ), with very steep edges (L/ro < 1). Then our growth rate is
cEy 2k o M k2D (13)
B2M+
We will further assume that bifurcation, if it takes place at all, takes
place at kL I. The bifurcation condition is then found by setting y = 0
in (13) with k - 1:
cEL-2 D 2L- (14)B (M+1 2
(1+)
cE' T0 L i M+1 2
_ 1( M+1) (15)
D 2 (14 - 1)
Noting that the left-hand side of (15) is simply McDonald et al.'s [1981]
Reynolds number Re we get
Re 1 (M + 1) (16)2 (M - 1)
V Note that McDonald et al. [1981] got
(1+ 1)2Re - 75 (M - 1) (17)
so the functional forms are the same but our Eq. (16) seems to state that
it requires 150 times more diffusion to stop bifurcation then was observed
by McDonald et al. [1981]. Whence the discrepancy? Part of the difference
can be removed by noting that the "finger" of McDonald et al. [1981]
corresponds to taking R = -, in which case we would get
Re - M(M +1) (18)_- A-(1e -DW)
d4"
- a
%p
![Page 14: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
.n-r. rr -, -'r -,,-d . Jr '..r, r- - .'*.... . . . . .s-,. .. .- . . -. .. . . ...- . . -. , ".
For large M this removes half of the discrepancy. Accounting for a larger
share of the difference is McDonald et al.'s [1981] equation for computing
L (their Eq. (5)), whlzh appears to give L's which are larger than the
minimum gradient scale length we have assumed here. However, we do not
believe this effect could account for a factor greater than ten, which
still leaves a discrepancy of more than seven. That is, the model we
propose here predicts a factor of at least seven greater diffusion
necessary to stop bifurcation than is given by McDonald et a!. [19P1]. The
U-shaped dependence on M, however, is the same. We hooe to be able to
resolve these quantitative differences in the sequel to this paper
[Zalesak, 1983], where the full effects of diffusion are considered.
V. Conclusions
We have derived an expression, Eq. 12, that we believe to be a good
approximation to the actual growth rate of perturbations applied to the
steepened backside of a two-dimensional ionospheric barium cloud, for the
case of no electron or ion diffusion. Diffusion plays a large role in the
behavior of two-dimensional barium clouds, however, and affects the growth
rate in two ways:
(i) diffusion will determine the maximum density gradient that can
exist at the backside of the barium cloud;
(ii) diffusion will provide a damping mechanism for any perturbation
which attempts to grow on the backside of the cloud. We have
already treated this effect, at least approximately, in Section
IV.
These two combined effects of diffusion are treated in the sequel to this
Vpaper [Zalesak, 1983].
6.'
6*a ~ 9 h Z ,* .1*.
![Page 15: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
3;- 4: 46I61
Appendix. Derivation of the E x B Instability Growth Rate for a
Discontinuous Interface
The geometry we shall consider is depicted in Fig. 6. The
differential equations describing this system are [McDonald et al., 1981]:
anate+ V-[ne - 0 (Al)
V-[n e V1 ] E.Vn e (A2)
where v - V x B (A3)B
Here ne is the electron density, which is n' for y > n(x) and n fory < TI(x), c is the speed of light, B is the magnetic field, E is the
imposed electric field, and is the induced electrostatic potential. Note
from Eq. (A3) that we have placed ourselves in a reference frame drifting
with the E x B velocity. Our two-dimensional plasma resides in the x-y
Cartesian plane. B is aligned along z.
If E - E x, and we ignore Hall currents, then the geometry depicted in
Fig. 6 is an equilibrium configuration with n - 0. We now apply a
perturbation to the position of the interface, denoted by n(x), of the form
a a cos kx e (A4)
and ask what the response of the electrostatic potentials in the two
regions will b2. Noting that Vn = Vn' - 0, since the fluid is
incompressible and we have only moved the interface, Eq. (A2) becomes
V2' -0 , y > n(x) (A5)
V2- 0 y < n(x) (A6)
If we assume solutions of the form
iati- G'(y) sin kx eiat, y > n(x) (A7)
9 9~
4
• # ,,,.%.%°.. - .,- A ,. -, - •% % % % % - "% - % % -. %" *- , - ..g .-%- -.. :. , . -. *-.' -. .-. a'. .- . . -, -o
![Page 16: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
. G(y) sin kx eiat v < r (x) (A8)
(Note we are assuming a specified phase relationship between n and ' which
will later be shown to satisfy our boundary conditions), then demanding
that t' vanish at y - + - and b vanish at y - o yields
€" C" e - k y snxe i a t
=C e sin kx e , y > r(x) (A9)
,;k. -. ",_' : =C e+k sin kx e t , y < -I(x) (AlO)
We shall later see that a is pure imaginary, meaning that the perturbation-. does not propagate in the x direction. Therefore the movement of the
interface is determined by the y-components of the velocity fields at the
interface, which must be the same for the interface to be well defined (no
:"" interpenetration or cavitation):
a- v" - v at y = n (All);.- . t y y
but v _ c 36y B ax
y B ax
so
B a'- kC-e-ky cos kx e t (A12)ce c seit ( )
- kC e k y cos kx e y
Since is assumed to be arbitrarily small we have
C C (A13)
but by Eq. (A4)
-n ia a cos kx e (A14)
% . " le -. '..:..10
![Page 17: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
so comparing (Al2) and (A14) we get
i-B a kC' kC (A15)c
Now we have one last constraint to satisfy, namely that 7.J 0 0. We
will use the integral form of this constraint, that is
.. s(v)J.n dS = 0 (A16)
for any control volume V bounded by surface S(V). Equation (A16) obviously
holds for any control volume not containing the interface n(y), since n - a
constant and V2€ = 0. Consider our interface and the control volume
depicted in Fig. 7. JL' JR' JB and J are the total currents flowing
* through the left, right, bottom and top surfaces respectively of thecontrol volume. We define n - xR) and
J J.n ds = J J + J - J =0 (A17)R L T B= *". nk~ - k y T 17xL
JT -n - - +nkCe x sin kx dx (AI8)
J n- - nkCek y B R sin kx dx (A19)B 3 y L
J JI + II (A20)R R R
where
J he -. xjdy (A21)
I"" YTJR n ( E -- Jdy (A22)R
Since both ax and the integration path length rYT- n. are perturbation
quantities in Eq. (A22), the integral involving n' aY/3x will be quadratic
in the perturbation and hence negligible. We then get
SI YT n'E dy =(YT nRJn'E (A23)
R IIR
![Page 18: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
- f'h.. ' :.:. -
. 3
*. Similarly
II RJ M n E dy YB n E (A24)* R a] B (A24)
I + .IH YTnE - YBnE + -, kn n')E (A25)"JR " R JR T"
Using similar reasoning we get
SJL YT n ' E - yBnE + ,L(n - n°)E (A26)
JR JL = (n - n')E(lR -nL) (A27)
S We now let
(xR - XL) +0 (A28)
Then
i''q =R J (n - n')E 22 x(A9J - 3'-,IR - L (A29)R JL antx R L)
but from Eq. (A4)
ax Ak sin kxeit (A30)
so
S-R JL (n - n')E a k sin kx e iattXR X L). (A31)
-3 Using Eq. (A28) and noting that YT and YB are perturbation quantities we
can set
x sin kx dx sin kx(XR - XL) (A32)L
UN -kYT +kYB
e "e = (A33)
12
• " -'.• "" ' ? * o-'o,"" . . "-,, o . .- ' " ".,v . * .*-• .- , .. ,.' - 0.'.. " . , ,,. . . " ." " .. " ,"-. . ,, ,,"
![Page 19: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
and hence Eqs. (A18) and (A19) become
JT + n'kC sin kx xR - XL) (A34)
J i n kC sin kx(x R -XLJ (A35)
JT -B (n + n) kC sin kxxR XL) (A36)
Combining Eq. (A36), (A31), and (A17) and canceling the common term
ksin kx e iatxR - XL) we get
(n + n)C - (n - n')E a - 0 (A37)
Now substituting Eq. (A15) into (A37)
(n +n)i(n - n )Ea,
- n kE (A38)n+n B
" n -n EB' i-" y - k C (A39), .>n + n B
Defining M n/n"
M + 1 k cE (A40)=M+l B-
which corresponds to the result obtained by Huba and Zalesak [19831.
V
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Defense Nuclear Agency.
-a3
"- " -"'.,"'""" - .- 2. '" -." . .V '.. ." " ." .2"; '-"2 i -. 2'" -- .-.i:2 --; -i;'.. i ." 2'."Y 2-- " - -i ." i"--1'32
![Page 20: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
BACKSIDE OF BARIUM CLOUD
.*.',
! n. =n o -+-nb ne no
A
...,Eo X
lq.4 - .
y eB =13BZ
Fig. 1. Idealized "waterbag" elliptical barium cloud geometry. The totalelectron density, barium cloud ion density, and background
T•ionosphere ion dens ity are denoted by ne t. nb , and n o
" " .'respectively. B is the ambient magnetic field, and E. is the
• .- externally imposed electric field. E is the constant shielded
=Velectric field inside the cloud. a and b are the majlor and minor
axes of the ellipse respectively.
S14
• .". •.-.,,. -. .. ' •. . . .",' " ... " ' '."%'. -"-' ' .'.'-*-.-" . % ." . -. .[." . ." "-. "-" . '. ."."" .'..b. '*.-,. , .. .,".'.'.: . ..j ,'''' , '.," r ; % Xe W % % .. "," :.,. .'.
![Page 21: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
E:E 1
E =Ex
FLUID INTERFACE y (x) cos kx
I,. •B B
no nol +flb
y
x ..
Fig. 2 Geometry of 1-D barium cloud configuration for stability analysis
of discontinuous interface.
I.155
9* ,
![Page 22: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
',
--40
Fig. 3 Isodensity contours of a steepened 2-D barium cloud. The box
indicates that region of space over which we will apply our -D
stability analysis by approximating the density gradient there as
a 1-D, slowly evolving structure.
16
![Page 23: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
%
I ID GROWTH RATE ~M+
ITOTAL GROWTH RATE M 1-I(M +I1)
-%.4
- D HEDNG (M+I
I5 10 15M
Fig. 4 Plot of the M-dependence of the growth rate given by Eq. (7), M -
1/(M + 1)2. Also shown are its two component parts, (M - 1)/(M +
1) and (M + )- I , due to 1-D instability and 2-D shielding
results respectively.
!.t1
j..
17
![Page 24: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
4..0
0S 0
.00
0.0
0.1 1.0 10 100k L
AFig. 5 Plot of normalized growth rate versus kL for the case of the M
lip 39 cloud considered by Huba et al. [19821. The solid line-e I
depicts the simple model shown here, while the circles represent
numerical results from Huba. et al. f 1982].
I'.v
4..
%'4
J* %J
'S 1
all e
![Page 25: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Y 0*
.51
ONTOE -E x
_" " F FLUID INTERFACE Y=, 7 (x)z= a coskx
'"'..P., n%,
I_ I
LCONTROL VOLUME V
~-6
Ay 0B =B z
x
Fig. 6 Geometry of I-D barium cloud configuration for stability
analysis, as in Fig. 2. n and 6 are the plasma density and
electrostatic potential, respectively. Primed and unprimed'p
variables denote quantities above and below the interface
y - n(x), respectively. Shown is the control volume used to
evaluate V.J.
19
![Page 26: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
" "
" YT < a
INTERFACE y : (x)
nI
'V .,
.., .JL J R
- n
~Ye 2 -a"I A
L J XR
Fig. 7. Blow-up of the control volume shown in Fig. 6. Depicted are the
total currents flowing through the four surfaces of the volume.
~ 20
>,,..v,*l2*
![Page 27: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
.4,°.,
References
Huba, J.D., S.L. Ossakow, P. Satyanarayana, and P.N. Guzdar, Linear theory
of the E x B instability with an Inhomogeneous Electric Field, J.
Geophys. Res., 88, 425, 1983.
Huba, J.D. and S.T. Zalesak, The long wavelength limit of
the E x B instability, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 10263, 1983.
Linson, L.M. and J.B. Workman, Formation of striations in ionospheric ion
clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 3211, 1970.
Linson, L.M., Slab release and onset time of striations, in Multiple Barium
Release Studies, KMR Ionspheric Monitoring Program, Spring, 1975,
HAPREX Final Report, vol. 3, Stanford Reserch Institute, Menlo Park,
Calif., Oct. 1975.
McDonald, B.E., S.L. Ossakow, S.T. Zalesak, and N.J. Zabusky, Scale sizes
and lifetimes of F region plasma cloud striations as determined by thecondition of marginal stability, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 5775, 1981.
Ossakow, S.L. and P.K. Chaturvedi, Morphological studies of risingequatorial spread F bubbles, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 2085, 1978.
Overman, E.A. and N.J. Zabusky, Stability and nonlinear evolution of plasma
clouds via regularized contour dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett., 45, 1693,
1980.
Zalesak, S.T., On the linear stability of two-dimensional barium clouds.
II. The effect of diffusion, NRL Memorandum Report in preparation,
1983.
21
![Page 28: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Ser -
DISTRIBUTION LIST
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DIRECTOR
COL1, CMD, CONT 7 INTELL INTERSERVICE :4PCLEAR WEAPONS SCHOOLWASHINGTON, D.C. 20301 KIRTLA," AFB, NM 87115
OICY ATTN DOCUMENT CONTROLDIRECTORCOMAND CONTROL TECHNICAL CENTER JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
PENTAGON RM BE 685 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301VWASHINGTON, D.C. 20301 OCY ATTN J-3 WJ4MCCS EVALUATION OFFICE
OICY ATTN C-650OCY ATTN C-312 R. .ASON DIRECTOR
JOINT STRAT TGT PLANNING STAFFDIRECTOR OFFUTT AFBDEFENSE ADVANCED RSCH PROJ AGENCY OMAHA, NB 68113ARCHITECT BUILDING OICY ATTN J-LTW-21400 WILSON BLVD. OICY ATTN JPST G. GOETZARLINGTON, VA. 22209OCY ATTN NUCLEAR MONITORING RESEARCH CHIZFOCY ATTN STRATEGIC TECH OFFICE LIVERMORE DIVISION FLD CCM!%.ND DNA
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DEFENSE CO%(MUNICATION ENGINEER CENTER LAWRENCE LIVERMORE LABORATORY1860 WIEHLE AVENUE P.O. BOX 808
RESTON, VA. 22090 LIVERMORE, CA 94550
OICY ATTR CODE R410 OICY ATTN FCPRL
OICY ATTN CODE R812COS. ANDANT
DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER NATO SCHOOL (SHAPE)CAMERON STATION APO NEW YORK 09172ALEXANDRIA, VA. 22314 OCY ATTN U.S. DOCUMENTS OFFICER02CY
UNDER SECY OF DEF FOR RSCH & ENGRGDIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSEDEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301WASHINGTON, D.C. 20305 OCY ATTN STRATEGIC & SPACE SYSTEMS (OS)
OCY ATTN STVL04CY ATTN TITL WWMCCS SYSTEM ENGINEERING ORGO1CY ATTN DDST WASHINGTON, D.C. 2030503CY ATTN RAE OCY ATTN R. CRAWFORD
COMMANDER CONANDER/DIRECTOR
FIELD CONAND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES LABORATORYDEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY U.S. ARMY ELECTRONICS COM4ANDKIRTLAND, AFB, NM 87115 WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, Nh 88002O1CY ATTN FCPR OICY ATTN DELAS-EO F. NILES
DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCYSAO/DNABUILDING 20676KIRTLAND AFB, NM 87115
O1CY D.C. THORNBURG
23
%I.
![Page 29: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
DIRECTOR DIRECTORBMD ADVANCED TECH CTR U.S. ARMY BALLISTIC RESEARCH LABORATORYHUNTSVILLE OFFICE ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005P.O. BOX 1500 01CY ATTN TECH LIBRARY EDWARD BAICYHUNTSVILLE, AL 35807
OICY ATTN ATC-T MELVIN T. CAPPS COMMANDER'OCY ATTN ATC-O W. DAVIES U.S. ARMY SATCOM AGENCYOCY ATTN ATC-R DON RUSS FT. MONMOUTH, NJ 07703
0ICY ATTN DOCUMENT CONTROLPROGRAM MANAGERB"D PROGRAM OFFICE COMMANDER5001 EISENHOWER AVENUE U.S. ARMY MISSILE INTELLIGENCE AGENCYALEXANDRIA, VA 22333 REDSTONE ARSENAL, AL 35809
OICY ATTN DACS-BMT J. SHEA OICY ATTN JIM GAMBLE
CHIEF C-E- SERVICES DIVISION DIRECTORU.S. AILMY COM2UNICATIONS CMD U.S. ARMY TRADOC SYSTEMS A.NALYSIS ACTIVITYPENTAGON RN 1B269 WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NM 88002WASHINGTON, D.C. 20310 OICY ATTN ATAA-SA
OCY ATTN C- E-SERVICES DIVISION OCY ATTN TCC/F. PAYAN JR.01CY ATTN ATTA-TAC LTC J. HESSE
COM!MANDERFRADCOM TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY COMMANDERDEPARTMENT OF THE ARM'Y NAVAL ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS COMM2!ANDFORT MONMOUTH, N.J. 07703 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20360OY ATTN DRSEL-NL-RD H. BENNET OICY ATTN NAVALEX 034 T. HUGHES
OICY ATTN DRSEL-PL-ENV H. BOMKE 01CY ATTN PME 117O10Y ATTN J.E. QUIGLEY OICY ATTN FME 117-T
OICY ATTN CODE 5011
--r . COM4ANDERU.S. ARMY COrM-ELEC ENGRG INSTAL ACY COMMANDING OFFICERFT. HUACHUCA, AZ 85613 NAVAL INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT CTR
OICY ATTN CCC-EMEO GEORGE LANE 4301 SUITLAND ROAD, BLDG. 5WASHINGTON, D.C. 20390
COMMANDER OICY ATTN MR. DUBBIN STIC 12- U.S. ARMY FOREIGN SCIENCE & TECH CTR OLCY ATTN NISC-50
220 7TH STREET, NE OCY ATTN CODE 5404 J. CALETCHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901
OICY ATTN DRXST-SD COMMANDERNAVAL OCCEAN SYSTEMS CENTER
2COMANDER SAN DIEGO, CA 92152U.S. ARMY MATERIAL DEV & READINESS CMD OICY ATTN J. FERGUSON5001 EISENHOWER AVENUEALEXANDRIA, VA 22333
OICY ATTN DRCLDC J.A. BENDER
CO,2MANERU.S. ARMY NUCLEAR AND CHEMICAL AGENCY
7500 BACKLICK ROADBLDG 2073SPRINGFIELD, VA 22150
OIC ATTN LIBRARY
424
4,/o
4.,
![Page 30: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY COMMA.NDERWASHINGTON, D.C. 20375 AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMA2ND/DCOCY ATTN CODE 4700 S. L. Ossakow DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
26 CYS IF UNCLASS. 1 CY IF CLASS) ENT AFB, CO 8091201CY ATTN CODE 4701 I Vltkovitsky OCY ATTN DC MR. LONG01CY ATTN CODE 4780 J. Huba (100
CYS IF UNCLASS, I CY IF CLASS) COMMANDEROCY ATTN CODE 7500 AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMALND/XPDOCY ATTN CODE 7550 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEOCY ATTN CODE 7580 ENT AFB, CO 80912OCY ATTN CODE 7551 OCY ATTN XPDQQOICY ATTN CODE 7555 01CY ATTN XPOICY ATTN CODE 4730 E. MCLEANOCY ATTN CODE 4108 AIR FORCE GEOPHYSICS LABORATORYOCY ATTN CODE 4730 B. RIPIN HANSCOM AFB, HA 0173120CY ATTN CODE 2628 OCY ATTN OPR HAROLD GARDNER
OIC0 ATTN LKB KENNETH S.W. CHAMPION
COMMANDER OICY ATTN OPR ALVA T. STAIRNAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND OCY ATTN PHD JURGEN BUCHAUWASHINGTON, D.C. 20362 OICY ATTN PHD JOHN P. MULLEN
OICY ATTN CAPT R. PITKINAF WEAPONS LABORATORY
COMMANDER KIRTLAND AFT, NJM 87117NAVAL SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM OICY ATTN SULDAHLGREN, VA -2448 OICY ATTN CA ARTHUR H. GUENTHER
01CY ATTN CAPT J.H. BURTON OCY ATTN NTrYCE ILT. G. KRAJEI
OFFICER-IN-CRARGE AFTACNAVAL SURFACE WEAPONS CENTER PATRICK AFB, FL 32925WHITE OAK, SILVER SPRING, MD 20910 OICY ATTN TF/MAJ WILEYOCY ATTN CODE F31 01CY ATTN TN
DIRECTOR AIR FORCE AVIONICS LABORATORYSTRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROJECT OFFICE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH 45433DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 01CY ATTN AAD WADE HUNTWASHINGTON, D.C. 20376 01CY ATTN AAD ALLEN JOHNSON
OCY ATTN NSP-2141OICY ATTN NSSP-2722 FRED WIMBERLY DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, & ACQCOMMANDER DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCENAVAL SURFACE WEAPONS CENTER WASHINGTON, D.C. 20330DAHLGREN LABORATORY 01CY ATTN AFRDQDAHLGREN, VA 22448
01CY ATTN CODE DF-14 R. BUTLER HEADQUARTERSELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION
OFFICER OF NAVAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEARLINGTON, VA 22217 HANSCOM AFB, MA 01731
OCY ATTN CODE 465 01CY ATTN J. DEASO1CY ATTN CODE 461OICY ATTN CODE 402 HEADQUARTERS010Y ATTN CODE 420 ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION/YSEA01CY ATTN CODE 421 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HANSCOM AFB, MA 01732OICY ATTN YSEA
25
o,,
*. ,,.e . ' -.. ,.-' .,. ". .',, ,S'. , . - -- "- . .",., /..., , , ,'1% .: ,' . :.
![Page 31: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION/DC ALBUQUERQUE OPERATIONS OFFICEDEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE P.O. BOX 5400WANSCOM AFB, MA 01731 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87115
01CY ATTN DCKC MAJ J.C. CLARK OCY ATTN DOC CON FOR D. SHERWOOD
COMMANDER EG&G, INC.FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION, A.FSC LOS ALAMOS DIVISIONWRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH 45433 P.O. BOX 809
OICY ATTN NICD LIBRARY LOS ALAMOS, NM 85544OICY ATTN ETDP B. BALLARD OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR J. BREEDLOVE
COMMANDER UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAROME AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER, AFSC LAWRENCE LIVERMORE LABORATORYGRIFFISS AFB, NY 13441 P.O. BOX 808
O1CY ATTN DOC LIBRARY/TSLD LIVERMORE, CA 94550OICY ATTN OCSE V. COYNE OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR TECH INFO DEPT
OCY ATTN DOC CON FOR L-389 R. OTTSAMSO/SZ OCY ATTN DOC CON FOR L-31 R. HAGERPOST OFFICE BOX 92960 OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR L-46 F. SEWARD,ORLDWAY POSTAL CENTERLOS ANGELES, CA 90009 LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY
(SPACE DEFENSE SYSTEMS) P.O. BOX 1663OICY ATTN SZJ LOS ALAMOS, NM 87545
OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR J. WOLCOTT
STRATEGIC AIR CO,%fMAND/XPFS OCY ATTN DOC CON FOR R.F. TASCHEKOFFUTT AFB, NB 68113 OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR E. JONES
O1CY ATTN ADWATE MAJ 3RUCE BAUER OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR J. MALIKOCY ATTN NRT OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR R. JEFFRItSO1CY ATTN DOK CHIEF SCIENTIST OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR J. ZINN
OLCY ATTN DOC CON FOR P. KEATONSAMSO/SK OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR D. WESTERVELTP.O. BOX 92960 01CY ATTN D. SAPPENFIELD
-'. WORLDWAY POSTAL CENTER
LOS ANGELES, CA 90009 SANDIA LABORATORIESOCY ATTN SKA (SPACE COM SYSTEMS) P.O. BOX 5800
M. CLAVMN ALBUQUERQUE, NM 8711501CY ATTN DOC CON FOR W. BROWN
SAMSO/MN OCY ATTN DOC CON FOR A. THORNBROUGHNORTON AFB, CA 92409 OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR T. WRIGHT(MINUTEMAN) 01CY ATTN DOC CON FOR D. DAHLGREN,01CY ATTN MNNL OICY ATTN DOG CON FOR 3141
OCY ATTN DOC CON FOR SPACE PROJECT DIVCOMMANDERROME AIR DEVELOPMENT CENTER, AFSC SANDIA LABORATORIES
' " HANSCOM AF3, MA 01731 LIVERMORE LABORATORY01CY ATTN EEP A. LORENTZEN P.O. BOX 969
LIVERMORE, CA 94550DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OCY ATTN DOG CON FOR B. MURPHEY
," LIBRARY ROOM G-042 OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR T. COOKWASHINGTON, D.C. 20545OICY ATTN DOC CON FOR A. LABOWITZ OFFICE OF MILITARY APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYWASHINGTON, D.C. 20545
OICY ATTN DOG CON DR. YO SONG
26
![Page 32: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
.. OTHER GOVER.MENT BOEING COMPANY, THEP.O. BOX 3707
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SEATTLE, WA 98124NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS OCY ATTN G. KEISTERWASHINGTON, D.C. 20234 OCY ATTN D. MURRAYOICY (ALL CORRES: ATTN SEC OFFICER FOR) OCY ATTN G. HALL
01CY ATTN J. KENNEYINSTITUTE FOR TELECOM SCIENCESNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS & INFO ADMIN CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC.BOULDER. CO 80303 555 TECHNOLOGY SQUARE
O1CY ATTN A. JEAN (UNCLASS ONLY) CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139QICY ATTN W. UTLAUT 01CY ATTN D.B. COXOICY ATTN D. CROMBIE OICY ATTN J.P. GILMOREOICY ATTN L. BERRY
COMSAT LABORATORIESNATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN LINTRICUM ROADENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES CLARKSBURG, M 20734DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OICY ATTN G. HYDEBOULDER, CO 80302
-1 OICY ATTN R. GRUBB CORNELL UNIVERSITYO1CY ATTN AERONOMY LAB G. REID DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
ITHACA, NY 14850, .' 01CY ATTN D.T. FARLEY, JR.
- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORSELECTROSPACE SYSTEMS, INC.
AEROSPACE CORPORATION BOX 1359.1,. P.O. BOX 92957 RICHARDSON, TX 75080
LOS ANGELES, CA 90009 OICY ATTN R. LOGSTON01CY ATTN I. GARFUNKEL 01CY ATTN SECURITY (PAUL PHILLIPS)OICY ATTN T. SALMI01CY ATTN V. JOSEPHSON EOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.01CY ATTN S. BOWER 606 Wilshire Blvd.OICY ATTN D. OLSEN Santa Monica, Calif 90401
01CY ATTN C.B. GABBARDANALYTICAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CORP5 OLD CONCORD ROAD ESL, INC.BURLINGTON, ,MA 01803 495 JAVA DRIVE01CY ATTN RADIO SCIENCES SUNNYVALE, CA 94086
OlCY ATTN J. ROBERTSAUSTIN RESEARCH ASSOC., INC. OICY ATTN JAMES MARSHALL1901 RUTLAND DRIVE
' AUSTIN, TX 78758 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYOICY ATTN L. SLOAN SPACE DIVISION
. 0l CY ATTN R. THOMPSON VALLEY FORGE SPACE CENTER.v.- GODDARD BLVD KING OF PRUSSIABERKELEY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 8555P.O. BOX 983 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19101BERILEY, CA 94701 OICY ATTN M.H. BORTNER SPACE SCI LABOCT ATTN J. WORKMANOlCY ATTN C. PRETTIE GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYOICY ATTN S. BRECHT P.O. BOX 1122
SYRACUSE, NY 13201OLCY ATTN F. REIBERT
27
.
. . . . 1 . . . . - - .
![Page 33: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
GENERAL ELECTRIC TECH SERVICES CO., INC. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYHaS APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYCOURT STREET JOHNS HOPKINS ROADSYRACUSE, NY 13201 LAUREL, MD 20810OCY ATTN G. MILLMAN OCY ATTN DOC'UMlENT LIBRARIAN
OICY ATTN THOMAS POTE.RAGEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE OCY ATTN JOHN DASSOULASUNIVERSITY OF ALASKAFAIRBANKS, AK 99701 KAMAN SCIENCES CORP
(ALL CLASS ATTN: SECURITY OFFICER) P.O. BOX 746301CY ATTN T.N. DAVIS (UNCLASS ONLY) COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80933OCY ATTN TECHNICAL LIBRARY OCY ATTN T. MEAGHEROCY ATTN NEAL BROWN (UNCLASS ONLY)
KAMtY TEMPO-CEN'TER FOR ADVANCED STUDIESGTE SYLVANIA, INC. 816 STATE STREET (P.O DRAWER QQ)ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS GRP-EASTERN DIV SANTA BARBARA, CA 9310277 A STREET 01CY ATTN DASIACNEEDHAM, MA 02194 OICY ATTN WARREN S. KNAPP
OICY ATTN DICK STEINHOF OCY ATTN WILLIAM MCNAMARAO1CY ATTN B. GAMBILL
HSS, INC.2 ALFRED CIRCLE LINKABIT CORPBEDFORD, MA 01730 10453 ROSELLEOICY ATTN DONALD HANSEN SAN DIEGO, CA 92121
OCY ATTN IRWIN JACOBSILLINOIS, UNIVERSITY OF107 COBLE HALL LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE CO., INC150 DAVENPORT HOUSE P.O. BOX 504CHAMPAIGN, IL 61820 SUNNYVALE, CA 94088
(ALL CORRES ATTN DAN HCCLELLAND) 01CY ATTN DEPT 60-12OICY ATTN K. YEH OICY ATTN D.R. CHURCHILL
INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE CO., INC.1801 NO. BEAUREGARD STREET 3251 HANOVER STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22311 PALO ALTO, CA 94304OICY ATTN J.M. AEIN OICY ATTN MARTIN WALT DEPT 52-12OICY ATTN ERNEST BAUER OICY ATTN W.L. INHOF DEPT 52-12OICY ATTN HANS WOLFARD 01CY ATTN RICHARD G. JOHNSON DEPT 52-12OCY ATTN JOEL BENGSTON OICY ATTN J.B. CLADIS DEPT 52-12
INTL TEL & TELEGRAPH CORPORATION MARTIN MARIETTA CORP500 WASHINGTON AVENUE ORLANDO DIVISIONNUTLEY, NJ 07110 P.O. BOX 5837O1CY ATTN TECHNICAL LIBRARY ORLANDO, FL 32805
01CY ATTN R. HEFFNERJAYCOR11011 TORREYANA ROAD M.I.T. LINCOLN LABORATORYP.O. BOX 85154 P.O. BOX 73SAN DIEGO, CA 92138 LEXINGTON, MA 02173OICT ATTN J.L. SPERLING 01CY ATTN DAVID M. TOWLE
OICY ATTN L. LOUGHLINOCY ATTN D. CLARK
28, 5... . . . . . , , . . , . , ,. - .. . '.,.,, .. ,' ..
![Page 34: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
74c'1777 7 77777
MCDONNEL DOUGLAS CORPORATION PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY5301 BOLSA AVENUE IONOSPHERE RESEARCH LABHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 318 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EAST
O"CY ATTN N. HARRIS UNIVERSITY PARK, PA 168020IC ATTN J. MOULE (NO CLASS TO THIS ADDRESS)01LY ATTN GEORGE MROZ OCY ATTN IONOSPHERIC RESEARCH LAB01CY ATTN W. OLSONOICY ATTN R.W. RALPRIN PHOTOMETRICS, INC.OCY ATTN TECHNICAL LIBRARY SERVICES 4 ARROW DRIVE
WOBURN, MA 01801MISSION RESEARCH CORPORATION QICY ATTN IRVING L. KOFSKY735 STATE STREETSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 PHYSICAL DYNAMICS, INC.
OlCY ATTN P. FISCHER P.O. BOX 3027O1CY ATTN W.F. CREVIER BELLEVUE, WA 98009OICY ATTN STEVEN L. GUTSCHE OCY ATTN E.J. FREMOLVJ
OCY ATTN R. BOGUSCHOCY ATTN R. HENDRICK PHYSICAL DYNAMICS, INC.01CY ATTN RALPH KILB P.O. BOX 10367OCY ATTN DAVE SOWLE OAKLAND, CA 94610OICY ATTN F. FAJEN ATTN A. THOMSONOICY ATTN M. SCHEIBEOICY ATTN CON"RAD L. LONGMIRE R & D ASSOCIATES
OICY ATTN B. WHITE P.O. BOX 9695MARINA DEL REY, CA 90291
MISSION RESEARCH CORP. 01CY ATTN FORREST GILMORE1720 RANDOLPH ROAD, S.E. 01CY ATTN WILLIAM B. WRIGHT, JR.ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87106 01CY ATTN ROBERT F. LELEVIERO.CY R. STELLINGWERF OCY ATTN WILLIAM J. KARZASOCY N. ALME OLCY ATTN H. ORYOICY L. WRIGHT OCY ATTN C. MACDONALD
Y Ol ATTN R. TURCO
MITITE CO"PORATION, TE 0ICY ATTN L. DeRANDP.O. BOX 208 01CY ATTN W. TSAIBEDFORD, MA 01730
I OCl ATTN JOHN MORGANSTER!N RAND CORPORATION, THEO"CY ATTN G. HARDING 1700 MAIN STREETOICY ATTN C.E. CALLAHAN SANTA MONICA, CA 90406
OICY ATTN CULLEN CRAINMITRE CORP OCY ATTN ED BEDROZIANWESTGATE RESEARCH PARK1820 DOLLY MADISON BLVD RAYTHEON CO.
MCLEAN, VA 22101 528 BOSTON POST ROADOICY ATTN W. HALL SUDBURY, MA 01776
OICY ATTN W. FOSTER OICY ATTN BARBARA ADAMS
PACIFIC-SIERRA RESEARCH CORP RIVERSIDE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
12340 SANTA MONICA BLVD. 330 WEST 42nd STREET- . LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 NEW YORK, NY 10036
-" *-" OICY ATTN E.C. FIELD, JR. OICY ATTN VINCE TRAPANI
,'.
![Page 35: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
-.- SCIENCE APPLICATIONS, INC. TRW DEFENSE & SPACE SYS GROUP1150 PROSPECT PLAZA ONE SPACE PARKLA JOLLA, CA 92037 REDONDO BEACH, CA 90278
OILCY ATTN LEWIS M. LINSON 01CY ATTN R. K. PLEBUCH01CY ATTN DANIEL A. HAMLIN OCY ATTN S. ALTSCHULEROCY ATTN E. FRIEM.AN OICY ATTN D. DEEOICY ATTN E.A. STRAKER OICY ATTN D/ STOCKGELLOLCY ATTN CURTIS A. SMITH SNTF/1575OICY ATTN JACK MCDOUGALL
VI SIDYNESCIENCE APPLICATIONS, INC SOUTH BEDFORD STREET1710 GOODRIDGE DR. BURLINGTON, MASS 01803MCLEAN, VA 22102 OICY ATTN W. REIDY
ATTN: J. COCKAYNE OCY ATTN J. CARPENTEROICY ATTN C. HUMPHREY
SRI INTERNATIONAL333 RAVENSWOOD AVENUEMENLO PARK, CA 94025OCY ATTN DONALD NEILSONOICY ATTN ALAN BURNS01. OlCY ATTN G. SMITHOtCY ATTN R. TSUNODA01CY ATTN DAVID A. JOHNSONOCY ATTN WALTER G. CHESNUTOICY ATTN CHARLES L. RINOO1CY ATTN WALTER JAYEOICY ATTN J. VICKREYOICY ATTN RAY L. LEADABRAND01CY ATTN G. CARPENTEROICY ATTN G. PRICEOICY ATTN R. LIVINGSTONOICY ATTN V. GONZALES01CY ATTN D. MCDANIEL
TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP75 WIGGINS AVENUEBEDFORD, MA 01730OICY ATTN W.P. BOQUIST
TOYON RESEARCH CO.P.O. Box 6890SANTA BARBARA, CA 93111
OICY ATTN JOHN ISE, JR.OICY ATTN JOEL GARBARINO
* 30
-4-.'%;''% .. ,1 . ,' '%% ' ',-,%. .¢ _,, .. ".,...-,' ' '.......V..,,V..%.'o%,, , .., . , ,
![Page 36: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
IONOSPHERIC MODELING DISTRIBUTION LIST(UNCLASSIFIED ONLY)
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE ONE COPY TO EACH OF TEE FOLLOWING PEOPLE (UNrLESS OTHERWISENOTED)
NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY NASAWASHINGTON, D.C. 20375 GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
Dr. P. MANGE - CODE 4101 GREENBELT, MD 20771Dr. P. GOODMAN - CODE 4180 DR. K. MA.EDA
- DR. S. CURTIS- A.F. GEOPHYSICS LABORATORY DR. M. DUBIN
L.G. HANSCOM FIELD DR. N. MAYNARD - CODE 696
BEDFORD, MA 01730DR. T. ELKINS CO.-%t\NDERDR. W. SWIDER NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMANDMS. R. SAGALYN DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYDR. J.M. FORBES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20360DR. T.J. KENESLIEA DR. T. CZ13ADR. W. BURKE
-''-.DR. H. CARLSON COM IN!ANDER
DR. J. JASPERSE NAVAL OCEAN SYSTEMS Cr'TERD JJS SSAN DIEGO, CA 92152
BOSTON UNIVERSITY MR. R. ROSE - CODE 5321DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMYBOSTON, MA 02215 NOAA
DR. J. AARONS DIRECTOR OF SPACE ANDENVIRONM3NTAL LABORATORY
CORNELL UNIVERSITY BOULDER, CO 80302. ITHACA, NY 14850 DR. A. GLENN JEAN
DR. W.E. SWARTZ DR. G.W. ADAMSDR. D. FARLEY DR. D.N. ANDERSON
DR. M. YMLLEY DR. K. DAVIESDR. R.F. DONNELLY
HARVARD UNIVERSITYHARVARD SQUARE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH
e CA.RIDGE, MA 02138 800 NORTH QUINCY STREETDR. M.B. McELROY ARLINGTON, VA 22217DR. R. LINDZEN DR. G. JOINER
INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSIS PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY400 ALMY/NAVY DRIVE UNIVERSITY PARK, PA 16802ARLINGTON, VA 22202 DR. J.S. NISBET
DR. E. BAUER DR. P.R. ROHRBAUGHDR. L.A. CARPENTER
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF DR. M. LEETECHNOLOGY DR. R. DIVANY
PLASMA FUSION CENTER DR. P. BENNETTLIBRARY, Nw16-262 DR. F. KLEVANSCARIDGE, m 02139
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS, INC.1150 PROSPECT PLAZALA JOLLA, CA 92037
DR. D.A. HAMLINDR. E. FRIEMAN
31
% . . "v"- . . . . . • . . .. -. . ..e.*. . . . . - - . . _. . . . , - . ,
![Page 37: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
STANFORD UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF TEXASSTANFORD, CA 94305 AT DALLAS
DR. P.M. BANKS CENTER FOR RESEARCH SCIENCESP.O. BOX 688
U.S. ARMY ABERDEEN RESEARCH RICHARDSON, TX 75080%%-.AN DEVELOPM ENT CENTER DR. R. HEELIS
BALLISTIC RESEARCH LABORATORY DR. W. HANSONABERDEEN, MD DR. J.P. McCLURE" ". DR. J. REI.SRL
D._H ERUTAH STATE UNIVEP.SITY
GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE 4TH AND 8TH STREETS*'.ERSIT oF ALOCAN, UTAH 84322
FAIRBANKS, AK 99701 DR. R. HARRISDR. L.E. LEE DR. K. BAKER
,*- DR. R. SCHUNKUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DR. J. ST.-M-AURICE
BERKELEYBERKELEY, CA 94720 PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
DR. M. HUDSON PLASMA PHYSICS PROGRAOtEAHNEDABAD 380 009
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA INDIALOS ALANIOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY Pj. PATH.K, LIBRARIANJ-10, MS-664
A- LOS ALAMOS, N.M 87545 LABORATORY FOR PLASMA ANDDR. M. PONGRATZ FUSION ENERGY STUDIESDR. D. SIMONS UNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDDR. G. BARASCH COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742
e'. DR. L. DUNCAN JHAN V.RYAN HELL.MAN,-DR. P. BERNlRDT REFERENCE LIBRARIAN
DR. S.P. GARY
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDCOLLEGE PARK, MD 20740
DR. K. PAPADOPOULOSDR. E. OTT
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYAPPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYJOHNS HOPKINS ROADLAUREL, MD 20810
DR. R. GREEN-JALDDR. C. MENG
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHV' PITTSBURGH, PA 15213
.DR. N. ZABUSKYDR. M. BIONDI
DR. E. OVERMAN
' .
m
V% %
![Page 38: EEEEEEEEEsinusoidal displacements of its boundary r = r + E a cos m (8) 0 m where ro is the initial radius of the cloud, r is the perturbed radius, am is the perturbation amplitude,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022071503/6122993308b35f7a264d6742/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
,s.. , , * *-.-h...~.~s*-I*-I * *~ * ~ * ~r-~3 *rq. r"r '; ~ -r
~,4 'r . . . A ~
~ .4 . . ;.4. , I
t ? S-
V- p 4
* t~j t4~t4.~4 Ct
-4.~w. 'v~~:
4I 4 -4'~,p.(<-v Wte
-7' 4.'-
tr -~ St >. Ii'
- .h9ti r~j~Y -. 4
~JpZ 4
it t' . ,.,..
A . 'V
'4*'~kb~&, r - 3? 'o ~ t
4N ,~ms~' rktft *aBt4.
-~ -L * *~ ;Y
rst- *~%t' ~4)! ~., 4 -0
fJr ~
745\ ~' 4r-. b ' As'fl. 41)dYLA
p4. 'U~ tv.;- p4 A-S it
tA-f v~r~ ~+V2{'4.4" ~ * a. r-cw~-..
p At .*:AA:wi t
S 'A
* At.
t-At,.
* 'AA~ - .~ -
6
97't-~' *1t$'&..
'--#' #IA,
* 4 k pg 4 . A's
.4 U p A'C I I
L~R~
- ~a3 HA ; 4tY~'%I4'~$~;Afr \ iiainst~t A.
'-'-.4