eeg electrical surveying ip

49
Electrical Surveying Part II: Induced polarization

Upload: yuri-syahwirawan

Post on 16-Feb-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

yap

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Electrical Surveying Part II: Induced polarization

Dr. Laurent Marescot

[email protected]

Page 2: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Introduction

Electrical surveying…

Resistivity method

Induced polarization method (IP)

Page 3: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Self-potential (SP) method

Higher frequency methods (electromagnetic surv

Electromagnetic induction methods

Ground penetrating radar (GPR)

Page 4: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Induced polarization me

The induced polarization method makes use o capacitive action of the subsurface to locate zo clay and conductive minerals are disseminated host rocks

Page 5: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Application

Exploration of metalliferous mineral deposits

Clay location for hydrogeological surveys

Mapping electrochemical reactions for polluta ground

Page 6: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Structure of the lectu

Basic IP theory and units

IP properties of rocks

Survey strategies and interpretation

Conclusions

Page 7: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 8: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

1. Basic IP theory and units

Page 9: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Basic theory

Page 10: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Membrane polarizatio

Page 11: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Electrode polarizatio

Page 12: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 13: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 14: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Note that membrane and electrode polarizations ca separately identified!

Page 15: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Time-domain IP

1 t2

M a = V0 ∫t1 V

Ma is the apparent ch milliseconds (ms)

Page 16: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Frequency-domain I

FE =100 ρa DC

ρ

FE is the percent frequ

Page 17: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

ρaDC is the apparent res low frequency (0.05-0.

ρaAC is the apparent resi higher frequency (1-10

Page 18: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Frequency-domain I

MF = 2π ⋅105 (ρ

aDC −

ρ

aAC )= 2π ⋅105

ρaDC

ρaAC

MF is the metal factor in Siemens per meters (S/

Page 19: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

This normalization removes to a certain effect th variation of IP effect

with the effective resistivity the host rock (ρaDC )

Page 20: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Spectral induced polarizatio

For a complete description of the IP phenomen frequencies are not enough.

The SIP technique frequency spectrum ranging from 10-2 to 104 H

The shift between the current and the potential discriminate between various metallic ores or

Page 21: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 22: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

2. IP properties of rocks

Page 23: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

IP versus resistivity

Page 24: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Chargeability of miner

Page 25: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Concentration 1 %, current injection time 3 s, int

Page 26: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Chargeability of rock

Page 27: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Current injection time 3 s, integration time 0.02 s

Page 28: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

IP effect…

… is higher for disseminated than massive cla metallic particles

… depends on the concentration of clay and m particles

…increases if water in the ground has a low co

… increases with decreasing porosity

Page 29: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

…varies with the amount of water in the groun

…depends on the current intensity and the cur frequency

Page 30: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 31: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

3. Survey strategies and interpretatio

Page 32: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

IP measurement

Different measurement devices for Time-dom Frequency-domain IP

Same electrode arrays (for mapping and sound conventional resistivity

Sensitive to telluric noise

Page 33: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Sensitive to noise resulting from electromagne between adjacent wires (dipole-dipole array ve

Stability of potential measurements can be a p non polarizable electrodes, see lecture on SP s

Page 34: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Interpretation

Mainly qualitative, more complex than for resi

Inversion using iterative algorithms (similar to

For SIP, getting information on material struct size of pores) using the Cole-Cole model

Page 35: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Mi

Page 36: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 37: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 38: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 39: EEG Electrical Surveying IP
Page 40: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

4. Conclusions

Page 41: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Advantages

Detection of disseminated mineral (difficult w resistivity)

Method sensitive to clay in aquifers

Page 42: EEG Electrical Surveying IP

Drawbacks

Same disadvantages than resistivity method

Electrochemical phenomena are still not well u

IP surveys is slow and more expensive than re surveys