eeri seminar on next generation attenuation models scec gmsv workshop: summary of other validation...

21
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models SCEC GMSV Workshop: Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications Nicolas Luco, Research Structural Engineer USGS – Golden, Colorado SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop – 10 January 2011

Upload: sharleen-ferguson

Post on 18-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

SCEC GMSV Workshop: Summary of Other

Validation Methodologies/Applications

Nicolas Luco, Research Structural Engineer

USGS – Golden, Colorado

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop – 10 January 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

Outline

• 2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

• LA Tall Buildings Seismic Design Council (LATBSDC): Zareian & Jones

• FY10 USGS External Research Project: van de Lindt & Pei (in collaboration w/ Hartzell & Luco)

• 2004 PEER Project: Bazzurro, Sjoberg, & Luco

• Others?

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

• Comparing responses of multi-story building models subjected to simulated & recorded ground motions

• Using simulated motions whose response spectra are similar to recorded ones, in 3 different ways …

1) One-to-one “matching” (pairwise)

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

• Comparing responses of multi-story building models subjected to simulated & recorded ground motions

• Using simulated motions whose response spectra are similar to recorded ones, in 3 different ways …

1) One-to-one “matching” (pairwise)

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

Figure 1: Example of record selection for the one-to-one comparison. Five best matches to the El Centro 180 degrees component from 3660 simulated Landers records. Selection is based on optimization of the mean square error relative to the target.

Fro

m 2

010

SC

EC

An

nu

al M

eeti

ng

po

ster

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

• Comparing responses of multi-story building models subjected to simulated & recorded ground motions

• Using simulated motions whose response spectra are similar to recorded ones, in 3 different ways …

1) One-to-one “matching” (pairwise)

2) Sets matched to Uniform-Hazard Spectrum

3) Sets matched to Conditional Mean Spectrum

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

Fro

m 2

010

SC

EC

An

nu

al M

eeti

ng

po

ster

Figure 2: The two different types of response spectra used in comparisons 2 and 3 (Building B shown as an example).

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

LATBSDC: Zareian

• Comparing responses of tall building models subjected to simulated & recorded ground motions

• Using motions whose response spectra are “matched” to Uniform-Hazard Spectrum (5 RP’s)

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

Response Spectra OVE (4975 year)

Period

Sa(T)

E-W

N-S

Sa(T)

RecSimMed. Rec.Med. Sim.Target

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

LATBSDC: Zareian

• Comparing responses of tall building models subjected to simulated & recorded ground motions

• Using motions whose response spectra are “matched” to Uniform-Hazard Spectrum (5 RP’s)

• Conclusion (partial): Differences in peak story drifts can (mostly) be traced back to differences in response spectra, but phasing differences linger.

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

A.)

B.)

Comparison of IDR time histories simulated vs recorded:

How was the IDR envelope developed?

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

FY10 USGS Project: van de Lindt & Pei

• Compared Damage Potential Indicators (DPI’s) for simulated & recorded ground motions

• Used simulated motions (from Frankel, Hartzell, Liu, & Zeng) for Northridge, Loma Prieta, & Izmit recording stations

• Conclusions:

– “Accuracy” of simulations depends on strength of building, in addition to vibration period

– Accuracy can be sensitive to source distance, site class, spectral acceleration level, and ground motion model

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

FY10 USGS Project: van de Lindt & Pei

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

Fro

m p

ap

er

su

bm

itte

d t

o

Ea

rth

qu

ak

e S

pe

ctr

a …

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

FY10 USGS Project: van de Lindt & Pei

• Compared Damage Potential Indicators (DPI’s) for simulated & recorded ground motions

• Used simulated motions (from Frankel, Hartzell, Liu, & Zeng) for Northridge, Loma Prieta, & Izmit recording stations

• Conclusions:

– “Accuracy” of simulations depends on strength of building, in addition to vibration period

– Accuracy can be sensitive to source distance, site class, spectral acceleration level, and ground motion model

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

FY10 USGS Project: van de Lindt & Pei

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

Fro

m p

ap

er

su

bm

itte

d t

o

Ea

rth

qu

ak

e S

pe

ctr

a …

Figure 16. Distribution of Delta-DPI for synthetic motions with accurate Sa value at building period

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2004 PEER Project: Bazzurro et al

• Compared elastic (Sa) & nonlinear (Sdi) response spectra, & inelastic-to-elastic spectral ratio (C=Sdi/Sa) for simulated & recorded ground motions

• Used simulated motions (from Beresnev, Dreger, Gusev, Hutchings/LLNL, Silva, Somerville/URS, & Zeng) for 20 Northridge recording stations

• Conclusions:

– Biases in shape of elastic response spectra resulted in biases in inelastic-to-elastic spectral ratio (C)

– Systematic differences in variability of C

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2004 PEER Project: Bazzurro et al

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

Fro

m P

EE

R R

ep

ort

on

P

roje

ct

1G

00

Ad

de

nd

a

(pp

. 65

-11

2) …

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

2004 PEER Project: Bazzurro et al

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

Fro

m P

EE

R R

ep

ort

on

P

roje

ct

1G

00

Ad

de

nd

a

(pp

. 65

-11

2) …

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

Outline

• 2010 SCEC Project: Goulet & Haselton

• LA Tall Buildings Seismic Design Council (LATBSDC): Zareian & Jones

• FY10 USGS External Research Project: van de Lindt & Pei (in collaboration w/ Hartzell & Luco)

• 2004 PEER Project: Bazzurro, Sjoberg, & Luco

• Others?

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011

EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models

FY10 USGS Project: van de Lindt & Pei

SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation (GMSV) Workshop

Fro

m p

ap

er

su

bm

itte

d t

o

Ea

rth

qu

ak

e S

pe

ctr

a …

“Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications,” N. Luco, USGS January 10, 2011