effect of carbon and mgal oxide supports and potassium promoter on higher alcohol selectivity over...
TRANSCRIPT
Effect of Carbon and MgAl Oxide Supports and Potassium Promoter on Higher Alcohol Selectivity over MoS2 Catalysts during Induction Period
Jin Wai Goh, Micaela Taborga Claure, Christopher W. JonesGeorgia Institute of Technology
Background Selectivity Results
Conclusions
Effect of Support and Promoter on Selectivity
Catalyst Preparation
Lower Olefins (C2-C4) are the key building blocks in the chemical industry• Primarily produced by steam cracking• Ethylene is the largest volume petrochemical produced worldwide• Growing demand for olefins-doubled over the past 15 years1
• Alternative energy sources to olefins needed
Syngas-based processes to olefins include
Higher alcohol (C2-C4) from syngas• Most widely studied family-noble metal catalyst is Rh• Modified methanol or modified Fisher-Tropsch catalysts• Modified MoS2 based catalysts with K
Previous work• K shifts product distribution from hydrocarbons to higher alcohols2,3,4,5
• K/MoS2 on carbon (C) supports are selective towards hydrocarbons6
• K/MoS2 on mixed MgAl oxide (MMO) supports yield high C2+OH selectivity2,6,7 • K/MoS2 domain was correlated with selectivity (single layes~HC selectivity,
double layers~ C3+OH selectivity)6
Further understand the effect of support and promoter on structure-selectivity relationship.
Objective
Supported Catalysts
CO hydrogenation reactions with syngasHigh pressure (1500 psig)Medium temperature (310 °C)(in-situ sulfidation at 450 °C)
CompositionAll CatalystsMo 5 wt. %Promoted CatalystsK 3 wt. %Mo/K (mol) = 1
• Unsupported MoS2 produced primarily C1 species while supported MoS2 produced primarily C2+ species.
• K promotion increases the induction period because K intercalation requires a ‘break-in’ period.5
• Weak Mo-C interactions created single layers on the carbon support – selective towards hydrocarbons.
• Strong Mo-MMO interactions created double layer formation on the MMO support – selective towards higher alcohols
(only for K/MoS2).
Future Work• Investigating absorbed species with in-situ IR• Investigate the structure of the catalyst via in-situ Raman
and in-situ XAS
References1H.M. Torres Galvis, K.P. de Jong, ACS Catal. 3 (2013) 2130.2M.R. Morrill, N.T. Thao, Catal Lett. 142 (2012) 8753A. Andersen, S.M. Kathmann, J. Phys. Chem. 116 (2012) 18264V.S. Dorokhov, D.I. Ishutenko, Kin & Catal 54 (2013) 245V.P. Santos, B. Linden, ACS Catal. 3 (2013) 16346M.T.Claure, S.H. Chai, J. Catal. 324 (2015) 887M.R. Morrill, N.T. Thao, ACS Catal. 3 (2013) 1665
Unsupported Catalysts MoC
MMO
K
Unpromoted Promoted
MoS2 Domains
Unpromoted Promoted
• Selective towards hydrocarbons
• Selective towards methane
Unpromoted Promoted
• Selective towards MeOH, followed by EtOH
• Selective towards C2+OH
• Selective towards hydrocarbons• Low higher alcohol selectivity
• Selective towards ethane
Predominantly single layer6
Predominantly double layers6,7
Multilayers7
Hypothesized MoS2 domain
Hypothesized MoS2 domain
Hypothesized MoS2 domain
C Mo MoC MoKC
MoMMOMMO
MoC MoKC
bulk MoS2
MoMMO MoKMMO
MoKMMO
K/ bulk MoS2
MoC
Mo
MoKC
MoMMO MoKMMO
Bulk MoS2
K/Bulk MoS2Bulk MoS2
K/Bulk MoS2
MoS2
CMoS2MoS2
CMoS2
MMOMoS2
MoS2
MMOMoS2
MoS2
K+
MoS2
MoS2
MoS2
MoS2
MoS2
MoS2
MoS2
MoS2 K+