effects of single versus multi-bed rooms on outcomes · effects of single versus multi-bed rooms on...
TRANSCRIPT
Effects of Single Versus Effects of Single Versus
MultiMulti--Bed Rooms Bed Rooms
on Outcomeson Outcomes
Welsh Health Estates and IHEEM ConferenceWelsh Health Estates and IHEEM ConferenceCardiff, March 2006 Cardiff, March 2006
Roger Ulrich, Ph.D.
Texas A&M UniversityBartlett School of Architecture, University College London
Safety (infection rates, medical errors, falls)
Stress, other medical outcomes
Satisfaction
Economic outcomes
Review research relevant to com-paring single vs. multi-bed rooms
ObjectivesObjectives
SAFETY: Single vs MultiSAFETY: Single vs Multi--Bed RoomsBed Rooms
• Increase hospital costs per patient by $40,000 in U.S.
Healthcare Associated Healthcare Associated Infections Infections (HCAI)(HCAI)
More that 145 studies were identified pertaining to infection and the hospital built environment
(Ulrich & Zimring, 2004)
• Enable proactive isolation of patients at admission
• Are far easier to decontaminate after patient is discharged
• Single-bed rooms are vastly superior to multi-bed rooms for managing air changes, pressure and maintaining clean air
SingleSingle--Bed Rooms Help to Bed Rooms Help to Reduce Infection RatesReduce Infection Rates
Surfaces commonly contaminated by MRSA(Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus) R.S. Ulrich with P.A. Wilson
STUDY [by Cepeda,…Wilson et al. 2005]
RESEARCH EXAMPLE
Patients: MRSA-positive patients in multi-bed rooms in two London hospitals
Interventions: After diagnosis, patients were either (1) moved to a single room or cohort nursed or (2) not moved – that is, they remained in multi-bed rooms
Findings: Isolating patients in single rooms or cohorts did not reduce MRSA acquisition rates
STUDY [by Ben-Abraham, Keller, Szold et al., 2002]
RESEARCH EXAMPLE
Patients: children in pediatric intensive care unit
Environmental intervention: Move from open ward to private rooms
Findings: 50% decrease in infections (respiratory tract, urinary tract, catheter-associated)
Effect of Single versus Two-Bed Rooms on HCAI
Bronson Methodist Hospital, USA
Effect of Single versus Two-Bed Rooms on HCAI
Bronson Methodist Hospital, USA
Richard A. Van Enk, Ph.D.Themba L. Nyirenda, MSRichard A. Van Enk, Ph.D.Themba L. Nyirenda, MS
Pebble ProjectPebble Project
Categories of Infections in Study Categories of Infections in Study (Van Enk and Nyirenda, 2003)(Van Enk and Nyirenda, 2003)
• Urinary
• Urinary, catheter-associated
• Pneumonia
• Lower respiratory
• Reproductive
• Surgical site
• Skin
• Bloodstream, primary
• Central nervous system
• Gastrointestinal
• Cardiovascular
• Ear/nose/throat
• Bone/joint
• Systemic
The impact of the move on the CSU: t = -2.83 , p = 0.005
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%Ja
n-99
Mar
-99
May
-99
Jul-9
9Se
p-99
Nov-
99Ja
n-00
Mar
-00
May
-00
Jul-0
0Se
p-00
Nov-
00Ja
n-01
Mar
-01
May
-01
Jul-0
1Se
p-01
Nov-
01Ja
n-02
Mar
-02
May
-02
Jul-0
2Se
p-02
Nov-
02
Month/Year
Infe
ctio
n R
ate
Infection Rates for Cardiac Surgery Unit(Van Enk and Nyirenda, 2003)
Infe
ctio
n R
ate
Move to New Building with Single Rooms
The impact of the move on the Mothers in Mother/Baby unit: t = -2.76, p = 0.006
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
Jan-
99M
ar-9
9M
ay-9
9Ju
l-99
Sep-
99No
v-99
Jan-
00M
ar-0
0M
ay-0
0Ju
l-00
Sep-
00No
v-00
Jan-
01M
ar-0
1M
ay-0
1Ju
l-01
Sep-
01No
v-01
Jan-
02M
ar-0
2M
ay-0
2Ju
l-02
Sep-
02No
v-02
Month/Year
Infe
ctio
n R
ate
Infection Rates of Mothers in Infection Rates of Mothers in Mother/Baby Unit Mother/Baby Unit (Van Enk and Nyirenda, 2003)(Van Enk and Nyirenda, 2003)
Move to New Building with Single Rooms
Infe
ctio
n R
ate
• Studies show that 85%-90% of the time roommates are source of stress not positive social support
Stress examples: roommate who is unfriendly or seriously ill
Roommates generate much noise
Do roommates provide stress Do roommates provide stress reducing social support?reducing social support?
American Women in Labor American Women in Labor &&
Delivery Units Rate Room NoiseDelivery Units Rate Room Noise
From Gesell and Malone (2002)Press Ganey Associates
Based on data from 152,399 female
patients in 566 hospitals across 46 statesJanuary through December, 2002
RESEARCH EXAMPLE
60
65
70
75
80
85Had roommate Single room
Pleasantness of room decor
Room cleanliness
Noise level in and around
room
Sat
isfa
ctio
nSatisfaction with Room Environment Aspects Satisfaction with Room Environment Aspects
(from Gesell and Malone, 2002)(from Gesell and Malone, 2002)
14.614.6
• Approximately 15%-20% of all
room transfers in U.S. hospitals
are caused by incompatibility
and stress among roommates
Transfers Worsen Patient Transfers Worsen Patient and Staff Safetyand Staff Safety
• Transfers cause sharp peaks in medical errors
• Increase infections
• Major cause of staff injuries
• Each transfer requires hours of staff time and paperwork
• Each transfers adds .5 day to LOS
Acuity-Adaptable, Single Coronary Critical CareMethodist Hospital, Indianapolis
Acuity-Adaptable, Single Coronary Critical CareMethodist Hospital, Indianapolis
BSA LifeStructuresBSA LifeStructures
Transfers reduced 90% compared to unit with multi-bed roomsSaves $5 million per yearMedication errors reduced 70%
Pebble ProjectPebble Project
Annual Medication Error Index Annual Medication Error Index (errors/patient days) coronary critical care(errors/patient days) coronary critical care
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001Med Errors
Mo
re e
rro
rs
Move to new unit Move to new unit with single, acuitywith single, acuity--adaptable roomsadaptable rooms
Source: A. Hendrich (2004). In Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. Quality Chasm Series, Institute of Medicine
Old unit with Old unit with
multimulti--bed roomsbed rooms
• Most falls occur when patients get out of bed unassisted. Design for increasing assistance for patients and thereby reducing falls includes:
Problem:Problem: FallsFalls
SAFETY: Single vs MultiSAFETY: Single vs Multi--Bed RoomsBed Rooms
Decentralized nurse stations
Single-bed rooms designed to support family presence
Acuity-Adaptable, Single Coronary Critical CareMethodist Hospital, Indianapolis
Acuity-Adaptable, Single Coronary Critical CareMethodist Hospital, Indianapolis
BSA LifeStructuresBSA LifeStructures
Pebble ProjectPebble Project
Family ZoneFamily Zone
BSA LifeStructuresBSA LifeStructures
Acuity-Adaptable, Family Centered CCUMethodist Hospital, Indianapolis
Acuity-Adaptable, Family Centered CCUMethodist Hospital, Indianapolis
FamilyFamily--centered centered single roomssingle rooms + + decentralized decentralized nurse stationsnurse stations improve observation and improve observation and assistance for patients, thereby reducing fallsassistance for patients, thereby reducing falls
Methodist Hospital Study: Patient Methodist Hospital Study: Patient Fall IndexFall Index (falls per 100 patient days)(falls per 100 patient days)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Move to new unit with Move to new unit with single familysingle family--centered centered rooms and decentralized rooms and decentralized nurse stationsnurse stations
Mor
e Fa
lls
Source: A. Hendrich (2004). In Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses. Quality Chasm Series, Institute of Medicine.
Old unit with Old unit with
multimulti--bed rooms, bed rooms,
centralized nurse centralized nurse
stationstation
Myth:
Single-bed rooms require much higher nurse staffing and therefore greatly increase costs
Myth:
Single-bed rooms require much higher nurse staffing and therefore greatly increase costs
Study: Staffing ImpactStudy: Staffing ImpactHendrich, Fay & Sorrells, 2004
• From two-bed to single-bed rooms• From centralized to decentralized
nurse stations• From acuity-based care model
(dependent on transfers) to acuity-adaptable without transfers
• From limited visiting times to family-centered care model
RESEARCH EXAMPLE
source: Hendrich, Fay & Sorrells, 2004
-50%
Nurse AttritionNurse AttritionNo. of Nurses EmployedNo. of Nurses Employed
Another myth: Another myth:
Single-bed rooms prevent observation of patients and therefore worsen safety
Single-bed rooms prevent observation of patients and therefore worsen safety
Visual monitor-ing window in a Canadian hospital built more than 20 years ago
Hexham HospitalNorthumbria NHSDesign: Jonathan Bailey
• Well-designed decentralizednursing stations improve visual observation of patients, thereby enhancing safety and outcomes
DecentralizedDecentralized Nurse Charting Nurse Charting
&& Observation StationsObservation Stations
Pendleton Memorial, New Orleans design: Blitch/Knevel
Decentralized charting/observationDecentralized charting/observation
Golden Jubilee National Golden Jubilee National Hospital Hospital (NHS)(NHS) GlasgowGlasgow
Single vs MultiSingle vs Multi--bed Rooms:bed Rooms:
Social Support from Family, FriendsSocial Support from Family, Friends
• Much research shows that contact with caring, emotion-ally supportive family/friends reduces patient stress and improves medical outcomes
Celebration HealthCelebration, FL Design: NBBJ
Single rooms are better for being with family, increasing social support
St. Gemma Hospice, UKDesign: Jane Darbyshire & David Kendall Ltd
Major stressor:Major stressor:
Poor staff communication Poor staff communication with patientswith patients
• Elevates patient and family anxiety and stress
• Considered by patients one of the worst stressors
• Worsens outcomes
STRESS: Single vs MultiSTRESS: Single vs Multi--Bed RoomsBed Rooms
• Patients in single rooms, com-pared to those with roommates, think staff communicate much better with them
Single vs MultiSingle vs Multi--bed Rooms:bed Rooms:
Staff Staff CommunicationCommunication
Single roomsSingle roomsimprove improve communicationcommunicationbetween clinical between clinical staff and staff and patientspatients
Evidence-Based Design to
Improve Financial Performance
Evidence-Based Design to
Improve Financial Performance
• U.S. patients are more satisfiedwith care when they are in single rooms rather than multi-bed rooms
• Vast majority of British patients likewise prefer single-bed rooms, especially if they have experience with such rooms (Lawson and Phiri, 2003)
Single Rooms and SatisfactionSingle Rooms and SatisfactionSource: Press Ganey US national data, 1999-2002
(approximately 4.5 million patients)
SingleSingle--bed vs. Multibed vs. Multi--bed Rooms bed Rooms (Ulrich, 2004)(Ulrich, 2004)
SingleSingle MultiMulti--bedbedHCAIMedical errorsFallsStaff observation of patientsStaff/patient communicationPatient confidentiality, privacyPresence of familyDeath with dignityNoiseSleep qualityPatient satisfactionPatient stress, painRoom transfers: costsManaging bed availabilityAdaptability to accommodate changeInitial construction costsWhole life costs
Example:Example:Karmanos Cancer InstituteKarmanos Cancer InstituteDetroit, Michigan, USADetroit, Michigan, USA
Previous facility: • Multi-bed rooms
• Centralized nurse stations
• Poor acoustics
$15 million renovation• 54 single-bed rooms
• Breast center
• Outpatient cancer center
Karmanos Cancer InstituteKarmanos Cancer InstituteDetroit, Michigan, USADetroit, Michigan, USA
Selected Data
• 30% reduction in errors
• 17% higher satisfaction
• Lower nurse attrition
• 16% decrease in patient use of narcotic pain drugs
• Average costs decreased >$1,000 per patient
Policy Changes Affecting Financial Policy Changes Affecting Financial Outcomes of Trusts in EnglandOutcomes of Trusts in England
• Choice
• Payment by resultsCosts of infections, falls, errors, longer stays paid to greater extent by trusts
Patients can choose where to go for care. Revenues flow with patients.
Two sources of competition: NHS and private providers
Study:Study:
Choice in the Birmingham Choice in the Birmingham
and Black Country SHAand Black Country SHA
MORI Social Research Institute, 2005
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Quality of information
Respectful care
Flexibility on visiting
Nice environment
Lower MRSA risk
Private room
Quality of food
How much do you think the How much do you think the privateprivate sector is sector is better than the NHS in these areas of activity?better than the NHS in these areas of activity?
source: 1,201 residents, MORI Birmingham SHA study, 2005
Comparing persons ‘easy to Comparing persons ‘easy to persuade’ vs ‘hard to persuade’ persuade’ vs ‘hard to persuade’
to choose private sectorto choose private sector
• Private room is important:79% of easy to persuade (EtP)47% of hard to persuade (HtP)
• Flexibility about visiting important:91% of EtP 77% of HtP
Based on the survey findings, the
independent sector could make £35
million in revenues this year from
choice in the Birmingham and Black
Country area
(source: Independent Healthcare Forum)
Kidderminster HospitalDesign: MAAP Architects
Hexham HospitalNorthumbria NHSDesign: Jonathan Bailey
Building Design and Construction
1
Maintenance
4.2
Healthcare (Business) Operations
50
Build it cheap and quick!
75-100
Healthcare Operations COSTS
Healthcare Operations REVENUES(from choice and performance)
Negative long term financial consequences
Greater risk for Greater risk for stakeholders stakeholders
After: Evans et al. 1998, Royal Academy of Engineering
Building Design and Construction
1
Maintenance
4.2
Healthcare (Business) Operations
[Revenues Minus Costs]
Build it based on evidence and spend slightly more
Healthcare Operations COSTS
Healthcare Operations REVENUES(from choice and performance)
Positive long term financial consequences
Reduced risk for NHS, taxpayer
Forecast Forecast (2010)(2010)
• Evidence-based design will become critical for improving patient safety, outcomes and trust performance
• Single-bed rooms will play pivotal role
Reference
Ulrich, R. S. and Zimring, C. (with Quan, Joseph, and Choudhary) (2004). The Role of the Physical Environment in the Hospital of the 21st Century. The Center for Health Design and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
available online at www.healthdesign.org