efficacy and safety of pleural biopsy in a etiological diagnosis o

Upload: md-tien

Post on 08-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Efficacy and Safety of Pleural Biopsy in A Etiological Diagnosis o

    1/3

    Abstract

    Study Objective: To find out the efficacy and safety of pleural biopsy in aetiological diagnosis ofpleural effusion

    Design: A prospective study. The efficacy and safety of pleural biopsy was studied in 50 patientsof pleural effusion.

    Setting: Out and In patients service of department of Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases, MLNMedical college Allahabad.

    Patients: 50 patients who were above the age of 12 years were studied. Total no. of male

    patients was 34 and female were 16.Results: Pleural biopsy made diagnosis of TB in 19 patients (out of 41 patients of tuberculosis),

    malignancy in 4 (out of 8), chronic non specific pleuritis in20, inadequate pleura in 5, acute

    pleuritis in 1 and no pleura in 1 patient. None of the patient developed any major complication.Conclusion: Pleural biopsy is 46% sensitive and 100% specific for tuberculosis in one bite. Yield

    can be increased if more bites are obtained. Similarly sensitivity and specificity for malignancy is50% and100%. And pleural biopsy is 100% safe procedure.

    IntroductionPleural effusion is a common chest problem, yet it is difficult to establish the aetiological diagnosis

    in as many as 20% cases, in spite of good history, thorough clinical , radiological and fullexamination of aspirated fluid. Prior to introduction of pleural biopsy the diagnosis of the cause of

    pleural effusion was more or less empirical. Closed pleural biopsy is a safe and simple alternativeto open pleural biopsy1. Its utility in the diagnosis of pleural diseases has been the subject of

    many extensive report1-9. Despite of its worldwide acceptance and the widespread availabilitythis investigation is not being used widely in India. We are reporting fifty cases in which this

    procedure formed an important part of the diagnostic evaluation, confirming both its usefulnessand safety in the work up of patients of pleural effusion.

    Material & Method

    Patients Selection

    Consecutive 50 patients of pleural effusion were studied, who were more than 12 years of age,irrespective of sex with no other systemic diseases. All patients underwent preliminary

    investigations as indicated by their clinical presentation, including haematological, radiological,bacteriological and biochemical.

    Biopsy procedure

    Pleural biopsy was done with Abraham's punch biopsy using standardizing technique10 with thevariation that only one bite was taken instead of multiple bites. A chest skiagram was obtained in

    each case 4-6 hour after biopsy procedure, to identify the pneumothorax. All tissue obtained afterbiopsy were fixed in formalin and haematoxyline eosin (H & E) stained were prepared after taking

    thin section of the tissue.

  • 8/6/2019 Efficacy and Safety of Pleural Biopsy in A Etiological Diagnosis o

    2/3

    Criteria for Histological Diagnosis

    Tuberculosis inflammation: The section shows collection of epithelioid cells with or withoutcaseation, surrounded by lymphocytes and giant cells of langhans type. Suggestive of tuberculosis

    inflammation: There is collection of epithelioid cells, without presence of giant cells of lengthenstype. Chronic nonspecific inflammation: The section shows presence of chronic inflammatory cells

    e.g. lymphocytes, plasma cells and eosinophils with evidence of fibrosis. Acute inflammation: The

    section shows fibrous inflammatory exudates with infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells.Malignancy: The presence of groups of cells showing hyperchromatism and anaplasia is confirmingof malignant infiltration of pleura. Fibrosis: The pleura show fibroblastic proliferation with

    collaginasation and occasional inflammatory cells. Normal pleura: consists of a membranecomposed of loose or dense connective tissue contiguous to muscle lined by mesothelial cells.

    Inadequate: The biopsy was labeled inadequate where the tissue shows fibro muscular of fibrofatty tissue only

    Results

    50 patients above the age of 12 years were studied. Male were 34 and female were 16.

    Satisfactory tissue was obtained in 44 (88%) patients, 5 biopsy showed inadequate tissue whileone patients showed no pleura. Of the 44 patients successfully biopsy, a definitivehistopathological diagnosis was made in 24 (54.5%); 20 patients in addition has diagnosis of non

    specific inflammation. Details of pleural biopsy are listed in table 1.

    Table 1: showing pleural biopsy finding

    None of our patients developed pneumothorax following biopsy. No patients have significantbleeding. 42 patients complained of chest pain at site of biopsy.

    DiscussionSince its original description in 1958 the technique of pleural biopsy has been adopted with nosignificant difference of safety and acceptable yield10. All reports are unanimous on its utility and

    safety. Critical patients have been evaluated without mishap. The diagnostic success rate hasbeen reported to vary from 30% to 100% for different diseases with multiple bites2, 3,5,7,8. Our

    results are comparable to almost all previous studies. The factors which determine success includethe number of samples taken2 and diffuseness of lesion in pleura. The safety of procedure has

    been emphasized. Common complications which are reported in the literature are pain at localsite, bleeding and pneumothorax etc. The relative ease of performance, the obvious advantage

    http://www.ispub.com/ispub/ijid/volume_7_number_1_20/efficacy_and_safety_of_pleural_biopsy_in_aetiological_diagnosis_of_pleural_effusion/effusion-tbl1.jpg
  • 8/6/2019 Efficacy and Safety of Pleural Biopsy in A Etiological Diagnosis o

    3/3

    over open biopsy and lack of any significant complication should prompt its more frequent use in

    Indian centers.

    Corresponding Author

    Dr. S. K. Verma,Associate Professor,

    Department of Pulmonary Medicine,CSM Medical University,

    UP, Lucknow, 226003Telephone: 91- 0522- 2254346

    References

    1. De Francis et al. Needle biopsy of parietal pleura. The N Eng J of Med 1955;2: 948-949. (s)

    2. Desmukh et al. Pleural Punch biopsy in tubercular pleural effusions to find out comparative

    value of single and multiple specimen. Indian J Tub 1972; 3: 95-100. (s)

    3. Donohoe et al. Pleural biopsy as an aid in the aetiological diagnosis of pleural effusion. Ann Int

    Med 1958; 48: 344-362. (s)

    4. Donohoe et al. Aspiration biopsy of parietal pleura. Am J Med 1857;2:883-893 (s)

    5. Hanson. Pleural biopsy in diagnosis of thoracic diseases. BMJ 1962; 300-303. (s)

    6. Hellar . Needle biopsy of parietal pleura. The New Eng J Med 1956; 11: 684-694. (s)

    7. Hoff. Diagnostic reliability of needle biopsy of the parietal pleura. Am J clinical path1975; 64:

    200-203. (s)

    8. Leggat. Needle biopsy of parietal pleura in malignant diseases. BMJ 1959; 478-479. (s)

    9. Levine. Tuberculous pleuritis, an acute illness-diagnosis by needle biopsy and acid fast stain.

    Am thoracic soc1962;68:127 (s)

    10. Abrams LD. A pleural biopsy punch. The Lancet1958; 30-31. (s)

    http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=De%2BFrancis%2Bet%2Bal.%2B%2BNeedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BThe%2BN%2BEng%2BJ%2Bof%2BMed%2B1955%3B2%3A%2B948-949.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Desmukh%2Bet%2Bal.%2BPleural%2BPunch%2Bbiopsy%2Bin%2Btubercular%2Bpleural%2Beffusions%2Bto%2Bfind%2Bout%2Bcomparative%2Bvalue%2Bof%2Bsingle%2Band%2Bmultiple%2Bspecimen.%2BIndian%2BJ%2BTub%2B1972%3B%2B3%3A%2B95-100.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Donohoe%2Bet%2Bal.%2BPleural%2Bbiopsy%2Bas%2Ban%2Baid%2Bin%2Bthe%2Baetiological%2Bdiagnosis%2Bof%2Bpleural%2Beffusion.%2BAnn%2BInt%2BMed%2B1958%3B%2B48%3A%2B344-362.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Donohoe%2Bet%2Bal.%2BAspiration%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BAm%2BJ%2BMed%2B1857%3B2%3A883-893%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Hanson.%2BPleural%2Bbiopsy%2Bin%2Bdiagnosis%2Bof%2Bthoracic%2Bdiseases.%2BBMJ%2B1962%3B%2B300-303.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Hellar%2B.%2BNeedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BThe%2BNew%2BEng%2BJ%2BMed%2B1956%3B%2B11%3A%2B684-694.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Hoff.%2BDiagnostic%2Breliability%2Bof%2Bneedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BAm%2BJ%2Bclinical%2Bpath1975%3B%2B64%3A%2B200-203.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Leggat.%2BNeedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura%2Bin%2Bmalignant%2Bdiseases.%2BBMJ%2B1959%3B%2B478-479.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Levine.%2BTuberculous%2Bpleuritis%2C%2Ban%2Bacute%2Billness-diagnosis%2Bby%2Bneedle%2Bbiopsy%2Band%2Bacid%2Bfast%2Bstain.%2BAm%2Bthoracic%2Bsoc1962%3B68%3A127%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Abrams%2BLD.%2BA%2Bpleural%2Bbiopsy%2Bpunch.%2BThe%2BLancet1958%3B%2B30-31.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Desmukh%2Bet%2Bal.%2BPleural%2BPunch%2Bbiopsy%2Bin%2Btubercular%2Bpleural%2Beffusions%2Bto%2Bfind%2Bout%2Bcomparative%2Bvalue%2Bof%2Bsingle%2Band%2Bmultiple%2Bspecimen.%2BIndian%2BJ%2BTub%2B1972%3B%2B3%3A%2B95-100.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Donohoe%2Bet%2Bal.%2BPleural%2Bbiopsy%2Bas%2Ban%2Baid%2Bin%2Bthe%2Baetiological%2Bdiagnosis%2Bof%2Bpleural%2Beffusion.%2BAnn%2BInt%2BMed%2B1958%3B%2B48%3A%2B344-362.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Donohoe%2Bet%2Bal.%2BAspiration%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BAm%2BJ%2BMed%2B1857%3B2%3A883-893%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Hanson.%2BPleural%2Bbiopsy%2Bin%2Bdiagnosis%2Bof%2Bthoracic%2Bdiseases.%2BBMJ%2B1962%3B%2B300-303.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Hellar%2B.%2BNeedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BThe%2BNew%2BEng%2BJ%2BMed%2B1956%3B%2B11%3A%2B684-694.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Hoff.%2BDiagnostic%2Breliability%2Bof%2Bneedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bthe%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BAm%2BJ%2Bclinical%2Bpath1975%3B%2B64%3A%2B200-203.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Leggat.%2BNeedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura%2Bin%2Bmalignant%2Bdiseases.%2BBMJ%2B1959%3B%2B478-479.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Levine.%2BTuberculous%2Bpleuritis%2C%2Ban%2Bacute%2Billness-diagnosis%2Bby%2Bneedle%2Bbiopsy%2Band%2Bacid%2Bfast%2Bstain.%2BAm%2Bthoracic%2Bsoc1962%3B68%3A127%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=Abrams%2BLD.%2BA%2Bpleural%2Bbiopsy%2Bpunch.%2BThe%2BLancet1958%3B%2B30-31.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Searchhttp://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=De%2BFrancis%2Bet%2Bal.%2B%2BNeedle%2Bbiopsy%2Bof%2Bparietal%2Bpleura.%2BThe%2BN%2BEng%2BJ%2Bof%2BMed%2B1955%3B2%3A%2B948-949.%0A&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search