efficient design of a c-band aperture-coupled stacked microstrip array using nexxim and designer...
TRANSCRIPT
Efficient design of a C-band aperture-coupled stacked microstrip array using Nexxim and
Designer
Alberto Di Maria
German Aerospace Centre (DLR) – Microwaves and Radar Institute – Oberpfaffenhofen
(DE)
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 2
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)range resolution
synthetic aperture and azimuth resolution
image retrieval
Antenna specifications
Patch design
Array setup
Feeding networks
Antenna assemblyfeeding networks optimization
Solver-On-Demandconfiguration
refining the model
HFSS complete antenna model
Conclusions
Outline
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 3
azimuth (x)
height (z)
v
ground-range (y)
frequency
W t
t
phase
range
range resolution cell
range
swath
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)range resolution
Cou
rtesy
of
Matt
eo N
an
nin
i
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 4
ground-range (y)
azimuth (x)
height (z)
x0
r(x)
SAR: synthetic aperture azimuth resolution
Cou
rtesy
of
Matt
eo N
an
nin
i
r(x)
xx0
chirpSynthetic Aperture
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 5
azimuth (x)
height (z)
range (y)
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
A Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) system allows the retrieval of reflectivity images of the observed scene with high spatial resolution.
A Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) system allows the retrieval of reflectivity images of the observed scene with high spatial resolution.
image retrieval
SLC Nominal Resolution: 1x1.5 m E-SAR (L-band) 1998
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 6
Antenna specifications
Carrier frequency 5.3 GHz (C-band)
Frequency range 5.05 GHz – 5.55GHz
Bandwidth 500 MHz (up to 800 MHz desirable)
Polarization Dual linear polarization (h, v)
Geometry Planar
Power 1.5 kW (peak)
Gain 17 dBi min
Input adaptation (S11)> 10 dB for 5.05 GHz – 5.55GHz
> 12 dB for 5.1 GHz – 5.5GHz
Azimuth beam width (θ3dB) 12 deg ± 1 deg
Azimuth Side Lobe Level (SLL) > 15 dB
Elevation (range) beam width (θ3dB) 34 deg ± 2 deg
Elevation Side Lobe Level (SLL) > 15 dB
Crosspolarization insulation ≥ 25 dBCritical requirements for SAR are: Bandwidth Azimuth beam width
Critical requirements for SAR are: Bandwidth Azimuth beam width
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 7
Patch design
Port1
Port2
W2
x
W1
x
Ls
Aw
A0
x
A0y
Aw
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 8
Patch design
4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50F [GHz]
-30.00
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft S parameters (dB) ANSOFT
m1 m2
m3 m4
Curve Info
dB(S(Port1,Port1))Setup 1 : Sw eep 1
dB(S(Port1,Port2))Setup 1 : Sw eep 1
dB(S(Port2,Port2))Setup 1 : Sw eep 1
Name Delta(X) Delta(Y) Slope(Y) InvSlope(Y)
d(m1,m2) 0.50 0.00 0.01 100.18
d(m3,m4) 0.80 0.26 0.32 3.13
Name X Y
m1 5.05 -21.90
m2 5.55 -21.89
m3 4.90 -16.91
m4 5.70 -16.66
5.002.001.000.500.200.00
5.00
-5.00
2.00
-2.00
1.00
-1.00
0.50
-0.50
0.20
-0.20
0.00 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
708090100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
-170
-160
-150
-140
-130
-120
-110-100 -90 -80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
DLR - Ansoft Smith Chart 1 ANSOFT
m1
Curve Info
S(Port1,Port1)Setup 1 : Sw eep 1Name F Ang Mag RX
m1 5.3000 4.9688 0.0721 1.1546 + 0.0145i
The impedance matching has been optimized for bandwidth. S11 < -20dB over the bandwidth.
The impedance matching has been optimized for bandwidth. S11 < -20dB over the bandwidth.
impedance matching
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 9
-200.00 -150.00 -100.00 -50.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00Theta [deg]
-60.00
-50.00
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
10.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft Far Field - Gain (dB) ANSOFT
Curve Info
dB(GainAccepted)Setup 1 : Sw eep 2F='5.3GHz' Phi='0deg'
dB(GainAccepted)_1Setup 1 : Sw eep 2F='5.3GHz' Phi='90deg'
Patch design
Patch antenna gain = 8.5 dB Front to back ratio = 20
dB
Patch antenna gain = 8.5 dB Front to back ratio = 20
dB
radiation pattern
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 10
Array setup
Port1
Port2
Port3
Port4
Port5
Port6
Port7
Port8
Port9
Port10
Port11
Port12
patch_offset
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 11
Array setup
-100.00 -75.00 -50.00 -25.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 75.00 100.00Theta [deg]
-120.00
-100.00
-80.00
-60.00
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft Radiated field - phi=0° ANSOFT
m3m1m2
Curve Info
dB(Ephi)Setup 1 : Sw eep 2F='5.3GHz' Phi='0deg'
dB(Etheta)Setup 1 : Sw eep 2F='5.3GHz' Phi='0deg'
Name Delta(X) Delta(Y) Slope(Y) InvSlope(Y)
d(m1,m2) -12.0000 0.0130 -0.0011 -922.2461
Name X Y
m1 6.0000 10.9124
m2 -6.0000 10.9255
m3 0.0000 13.7438
-100.00 -75.00 -50.00 -25.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 75.00 100.00Theta [deg]
-140.00
-120.00
-100.00
-80.00
-60.00
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft Radiated field - phi=90° ANSOFT
Curve Info
dB(Ephi)Setup 1 : Sw eep 2F='5.3GHz' Phi='90deg'
dB(Etheta)Setup 1 : Sw eep 2F='5.3GHz' Phi='90deg'
Patches distance:optimized to obtain the
required beamwidth (12 deg).
Feed voltage tapering:using Dolph-Chebyshev to
obtain the required SLL (-20dB).
radiation pattern
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 12
Feeding network
Port1
Port2 Port3
Port4 Port5
Port6 Port7
P=init
W=W
f50
12
W1=W
f50W
2=W50to50
1
23T
U17Tee_Comp_ExtArms6
P=LT1 - W
50to50/2W
=W50to50
P=L1W=Wf50
P=L1W=Wf50
1 2
W1=Wf50W2=WT2
12
W1=Wf50W2=WT2
P=LT2 - WT2/2W=WT2
P=LT2 - WT2/2W=WT2
1
23
T
U1
Tee_
Com
p_E
xtA
rms6
1
23
TU2
Tee_
Com
p_E
xtA
rms6
P=L9
W=W
f55
P=L9
W=W
f55P
=L7
W=W
f50
P=L
7W
=Wf5
0
P=L6W=Wf50
P=L
8W
=Wf5
0
P=L6W=Wf50
P=L
8W
=Wf5
0
1
2T
U3Bend_OptimumMitered6
1
2T
U4
Ben
d_O
ptim
umM
itere
d6
1
2T
U5
Ben
d_O
ptim
umM
itere
d6
1
2T
U6
Bend_OptimumMitered6
1
2T
U7Bend_OptimumMitered6
1
2T
U8Bend_OptimumMitered6 P=L2_1
W=Wf55
P=L2_1W=Wf55
1
2T U9
Bend_O
ptimum
Mitered6
1
2T
U10
Bend_O
ptimum
Mitered6
P=L
10W
=Wf5
5P
=LT3
- W
T3/2
W=W
T3
P=L
10W
=Wf5
5P
=LT3
- W
T3/2
W=W
T3
12
W1=
Wf5
5W
2=W
T3
12
W1=
Wf5
5W
2=W
T3
1
2 3T
U11Tee_Comp_ExtArms6
1
23T
U12Tee_Comp_ExtArms6 P=L5
W=Wf50
P=L
12W
=Wf5
0
1
2T
U13
Ben
d_O
ptim
umM
itere
d6
P=L5W=Wf50
1
2T
U14
Bend_OptimumMitered6
P=L
12W
=Wf5
0
P=L3W=Wf100
12
W1=Wf100W2=WT4
P=LT4W=WT4
12
W1=WT4W2=Wf50
P=L4W=Wf50
1
2T
U15
Bend_O
ptimum
Mitered6
P=L
11W
=Wf5
0
P=L3W=Wf100
1 2
W1=Wf100W2=WT4
P=LT4W=WT4
1 2
W1=WT4W2=Wf50
P=L4W=Wf50
1
2T
U16
Bend_O
ptimum
Mitered6
P=L
11W
=Wf5
0
P=L2_2W=Wf55
P=L2_2W=Wf55
Port1
Port2 Port3
Port4 Port5
Port6 Port7
P=i
nit
W=W
f50
12 W1=Wf50
W2=W50to50
1
2 3T
U1Tee_Comp_ExtArms5
P=LT1 - W50to50/2W=W50to50
P=L1LW=Wf50
P=L1RW=Wf50
12
W1=Wf50W2=WT2
1 2
W1=Wf50W2=WT2
P=LT2L - WT2/2W=WT2
P=LT2R - WT2/2W=WT2
P=L3
W=W
f50
P=L3
W=W
f50
P=L4RW=Wf50
P=L5
W=W
f50
P=L4LW=Wf50
P=L5
W=W
f50
1
2T
U2Bend_OptimumMitered5
1
2T
U3
Bend_O
ptimum
Mitered5
1
2T
U4
Bend_O
ptimum
Mitered5
1
2T
U5
Bend_OptimumMitered5
P=L7LW=Wf55
P=L7RW=Wf55
1
2TU
6B
end_
Opt
imum
Mite
red5
1
2T
U7
Ben
d_O
ptim
umM
itere
d5
P=LT3L - W
T3/2W
=WT3
P=L8_1R
W=W
f55
12
W1=W
f55W
2=WT3
P=L10RW=Wf50
P=L11RW=Wf100
1 2
W1=Wf100W2=WT4 P=LT4R
W=WT4
1 2
W1=WT4W2=Wf50 P=L12R
W=Wf50
P=L8R+L8_2RW=Wf55
P=L8LW=Wf55
1
2
3T
U8Tee_90_ext3
1
2
3T
U9Tee_90_ext3
1
2T
U10Bend_OptimumMitered5
P=L6W=Wf50 1
2T
U11
Ben
d_O
ptim
umM
itere
d5
P=L6W=Wf50
1
2T
U12Bend_OptimumMitered5
1
2T
U13Bend_OptimumMitered5
P=L8_2RW=Wf55
P=L9R
W=W
f55
12
W1=W
f55W
2=WT3
P=LT3R
- WT3/2
W=W
T3
1
23 T
U14Tee_Comp_aligned3
1
2 3T
U15Tee_Comp_aligned3
P=L12LW=Wf50
12
W1=WT4W2=Wf50
P=LT4LW=WT4
12
W1=Wf100W2=WT4
P=L11LW=Wf100
P=L10LW=Wf50
P=L9L
W=W
f55HH
VV
Special components are created in Designer and inserted in Nexxim.
Special components are created in Designer and inserted in Nexxim.
schematic
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 13
Feeding network
Special components are created in Designer and inserted in Nexxim.
Special components are created in Designer and inserted in Nexxim.
layout
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 14
Feeding network A full parameterization and the use of Position Relative function assure the layout consistency over the variables variations.
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 15
Antenna assembly
PortV
PortH
H
V
Port1 Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6
Port7 Port8 Port9 Port10 Port11 Port12
U1ArrayOfSixPatches1
H
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
U2FeedingNetworkH1
V
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
U24FeedingNetworkV1
Port1 Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6
Port7 Port8 Port9 Port10 Port11 Port12
H
V
H
V
H
V
H
V
H
V
H
V
H
V
Port1 Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6
Port7 Port8 Port9 Port10 Port11 Port12
H
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
V
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
H
V
Port1 Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6
Port7 Port8 Port9 Port10 Port11 Port12
H
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
V
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
H
V
Port1 Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6
Port7 Port8 Port9 Port10 Port11 Port12
H
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
V
Port1
Port2 Port3 Port4 Port5 Port6 Port7
Port2 Port3
Port8 Port9
H
V
H
V
H
V
The array of six patches and the two feeding networks are combined together in a top level circuit in order to create the entire antenna.
schematic
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 16
Antenna assemblylayout
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 17
4.30 4.55 4.80 5.05 5.30 5.55 5.80 6.05 6.30F [GHz]
-50.00
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft S parameter - Circuit simulation ANSOFT
Curve Info
dB(S(PortV,PortV))LinearFrequency
dB(S(PortV,PortH))LinearFrequency
dB(S(PortH,PortH))LinearFrequency
As the parameterization is retained through the hierarchy, it is possible to set-up optimization of the feeding networks directly in the top level circuit.
Feeding network optimization Antenna assembly
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 18
Solver-On-Demand
The Solver-On-Demand lets you choose the simulation engine. Then each antenna part can be simulated either as circuit or with full wave analysis.
configuration
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 19
Solver-On-Demand
4.30 4.55 4.80 5.05 5.30 5.55 5.80 6.05 6.30F [GHz]
-60.00
-50.00
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft S parameter total - PlanarEM Simulation ANSOFT
Curve Info
dB(S(PortV,PortV))_PlanarEM
dB(S(PortV,PortH))_PlanarEM
dB(S(PortH,PortH))_PlanarEM
dB(S(PortV,PortV))_Circuit
dB(S(PortV,PortH))_Circuit
dB(S(PortH,PortH))_Circuit
Here a full wave analysis has been done. But the three components (feeding networks H and V and the array) are still independent i.e. no mutual coupling between them is considered.
Here a full wave analysis has been done. But the three components (feeding networks H and V and the array) are still independent i.e. no mutual coupling between them is considered.
refining the model – step 1
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 20
4.30 4.55 4.80 5.05 5.30 5.55 5.80 6.05 6.30F [GHz]
-60.00
-50.00
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft S parameter total - FULL PlanarEM ANSOFT
Curve Info
dB(S(PortH,PortH))
dB(S(PortH,PortV))
dB(S(PortV,PortV))
dB(S(PortV,PortH))1
dB(S(PortH,PortH))1
dB(S(PortV,PortV))1
4.30 4.55 4.80 5.05 5.30 5.55 5.80 6.05 6.30F [GHz]
-60.00
-50.00
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
Y1
DLR - Ansoft S parameter total - FULL PlanarEM ANSOFT
Curve Info
dB(S(PortH,PortV))_FULL
dB(S(PortV,PortV))_FULL
dB(S(PortH,PortH))_FULL
dB(S(PortV,PortV))_Circuit
dB(S(PortV,PortH))_Circuit
dB(S(PortH,PortH))_Circuit
dB(S(PortV,PortV))1
dB(S(PortV,PortH))1
dB(S(PortH,PortH))1
Solver-On-Demand
Simulation shows that, when the entire antenna is simulated at once, the matching is up to 8dB worse than what we obtained with optimization at the circuit level.
What can be done?
Simulation shows that, when the entire antenna is simulated at once, the matching is up to 8dB worse than what we obtained with optimization at the circuit level.
What can be done?
8dB8dB
refining the model – step 2
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 21
Solver-On-Demand
Simulation shows that, when the entire antenna is simulated at once, the performance is up to 8dB worse than what we obtained with optimization at the circuit level.
What can be done?
Simulation shows that, when the entire antenna is simulated at once, the performance is up to 8dB worse than what we obtained with optimization at the circuit level.
What can be done?
Through Solver-On-Demand (as the parameterization is retained) it is possible to optimize again the antenna matching, running the simulation with PlanarEM engine.
Through Solver-On-Demand (as the parameterization is retained) it is possible to optimize again the antenna matching, running the simulation with PlanarEM engine.
The entire antenna can be exported in one click to HFSS, retaining all the variables and parameters. The final optimization can be run in HFSS. Other elements can be taken in account (connectors, screws, vertical elements)
The entire antenna can be exported in one click to HFSS, retaining all the variables and parameters. The final optimization can be run in HFSS. Other elements can be taken in account (connectors, screws, vertical elements)
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 22
HFSS complete antenna model
The model is electrically large and complex
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 23
Distributes mesh sub-domains to networked processors and memory
HFSS complete antenna model
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 24
HFSS complete antenna modelDomain Decomposition Solver Profile
8 Domains
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 25
HFSS complete antenna modelField Animation: Antenna, feed and enclosureVertical Polarization
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 26
HFSS complete antenna modelField Animation: Antenna, feed and enclosureHorizontal Polarization
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 27
HFSS complete antenna model
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 28
Conclusions
The design of an array antenna suitable for an airborne SAR system, operating at C-Band has been presented.
Every antenna component has been designed separately with a fully parameterized model and has been easily tuned and optimized with Designer, to meet the dimensional and frequency requirements.
The individual components are then assembled and interconnected in the Nexxim circuit simulator to form the entire array. The assembly is tuned and optimized using the speed capability of Nexxim.
The Solver-On-Demand feature lets us choose which part of the antenna will be solved with a full wave analysis and which part will be solved with a fast circuit simulation.
The entire antenna has been then exported in HFSS. The final tuning is hence done in a very detailed model.
The design of an array antenna suitable for an airborne SAR system, operating at C-Band has been presented.
Every antenna component has been designed separately with a fully parameterized model and has been easily tuned and optimized with Designer, to meet the dimensional and frequency requirements.
The individual components are then assembled and interconnected in the Nexxim circuit simulator to form the entire array. The assembly is tuned and optimized using the speed capability of Nexxim.
The Solver-On-Demand feature lets us choose which part of the antenna will be solved with a full wave analysis and which part will be solved with a fast circuit simulation.
The entire antenna has been then exported in HFSS. The final tuning is hence done in a very detailed model.
ANSYS Conference & 27. CADFEM Users’ Meeting 2009 – Nov. 19 th - 29
Thank you