egypt in gcr; 10-11 - 18092010
DESCRIPTION
Egypt Competitiveness Rankings according to World Economic Forum 2010-2011 Global Competitiveness ReportTRANSCRIPT
Egypt in The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-
2011
Egypt RankingsSeptember 2010
Cairo1
The World Economic Forum (WEF)
The WEF is an independent international organization committed to improving
the state of the world by engaging leaders in partnerships to shape the global,
regional and industry agendas.
The WEF Forum is impartial and not-for-profit; it is tied to no political, partisan or
national interests. The World Economic Forum is under the supervision of the
Swiss Federal Government, Established in 1971 with its headquarters in Geneva,
Switzerland, with offices in New York and Beijing.
3
Global Competitiveness Reports (GCR)
Flagship product: The Global Competitiveness Report:
Launched in 1979 covering 16 countries; it has since
Expanded its coverage to 133 countries.
Editor: Professor Klaus Schwab
19
79
4
Global Competitiveness Reports (GCR)
The GCR’s Goal is to provide a benchmarking tool for policy-makers and
business leaders
The Global Competitiveness Report assesses the ability of countries to provide
high levels of prosperity to their citizens. This in turn depends on how
productively a country uses available resources. Therefore, the Global
Competitiveness Index measures the set of institutions, policies, and factors that
set the sustainable current and medium-term levels of economic prosperity.
5
Use of hard data (publicly available information) and survey data
(from the Executive Opinion Survey)
The Executive Opinion Survey records the perspectives of business
leaders around the world; survey data is indispensable, particularly for
dimensions where no reliable hard data sources exist
The Global Competitiveness Report (GCR)
Data sources
6
The Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) is a new, more
comprehensive tool to assess competitiveness of nations.
Developed for the World Economic Forum by Professor Xavier Sala-i-
Martin of Columbia University, the new index extends and deepens the
concepts and ideas underpinning the Growth Competitiveness Index
formerly used by the Forum.
Officially launched in September 2006 as part of The Global
Competitiveness Report 2006-2007, the GCI has now become the most
recognized index of reference for competitiveness.
The Global Competitiveness Index (GCI)
Definition:
7
BASIC REQUIREMENTS
EFFICIENCY ENHANCERS
INNOVATION & SOPHISTICATIONS FACTORS
The Global Competitiveness Index (GCI)
Th
e F
ram
ew
ork
12 P
illars
of
Com
peti
tiveness
•Institutions
•Infrastructure
•Macroeconomic stability
•Health and primary education
Key forfactor-driven
economies
•Higher education and training
•Goods market efficiency
•Labor market efficiency
•Financial market sophistication
•Technological Readiness
•Market size
Key forefficiency-driven
economies
•Business sophistication
•Innovation
Key forinnovation-driven
economies
Basic Requirements(4)
Efficiency Enhancers(6)
Innovation & Sophistications Factors(2)
8
Egypt Rankings in GCR
Performance and trend
9
The Global Competitiveness Index 2010-2011
10
The Global Competitiveness Index 2010-2011
Reg
ion
al
Vie
w
11
2010-2011 2009–2010 2008–2009 2007-2008
Score 4 4.04 4 3.96
Rank 81 70 81 77
Out of 139 133 134 131
Evolution of Egypt Overall Rankings
12
Benchmarking Egypt Performance; 2010-2011
13
• Qatar Tops Arab Countries
• South Africa Tops African Countries
• Tunisia Tops North African Countries
Click Here to View Full
Benchmarking with 14
selected countries
Score (out of 7)
Evolution of Egypt Rankings in GCI Pillars
14
• Best Performance:
• Market Size
• Worst Performance:
• Labor Market Efficiency
• Top Improvement:
• Business Sophistication
• Most Deterioration:
• Higher Education and Training
• Innovation
• Infrastructure
• Macroeconomic Stability
•Straight Improvement:
•Financial Market Sophistication
•Straight Deterioration
•Institutions
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
Evolution of Egypt Rankings in GCI Pillars
15ImprovementDeterioration
Rank movement
Market Size
16
• Sheer Market Size is Egypt’s main competitive strengths, which allows businesses to exploit economies of scale
• Although remaining the overall rank, Egypt lost ranking in the two sub-indices of this pillar
• Size of the domestic market is calculated as the Sum of gross domestic product plus value of imports of goods and services, minus value of exports of goods and services
• The size of the foreign market is estimated based on the total value of exports of goods and Services
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Labor market efficiency
17
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
• The labor market continues to be overregulated, which reduces its ability to property allocate and employ human
• The biggest loss came at the labor-employer relation ranking
• Worst performance areas include female participation in labor force, and the redundancy (firing) cost
• Although better ranking, Egypt still face high risk of a degradation of human capital, brain drain from the country (123rd), potentially causing social problems
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Business Sophistication
18
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
• Business sophistication concerns the quality of a country’s overall business networks as well as the quality of individual firms’ operations and strategies
• Best performance is for the nature of competitive advantage, followed the quantity of local suppliers
• However, the quality of local suppliers is ranked the worst just and only better than the control of international distribution
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Higher education and training
19
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
• Best performance is for the availability of research of training services
• Worst performance is for the overall quality of educational system.
• All areas except the availability, witnessed deterioration versus last year
• The most deteriorated area is the secondary education enrollment rate (data from UNESCO)
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Innovation
20
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
• Best performance is for the availability of scientists and engineers, and it’s also the only area the witnessed improved ranking than previous year
• Worst performance is for the university-industry collaboration in R&D, and this refers to the issue of isolated academic organizations in Egypt
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Infrastructure
21
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
• 2010-2011 report included additional ranking for Mobile telephone subscriptions and Egypt ranked 102/139
• The only area that had a significant improvement is quality of air transport
• The worst performance is for telephone lines ranking, and it’s also the most deteriorated area
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Institutions
22
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
• 2010-2011 report included four more rankings:
• Irregular payments and bribes (64)
• Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes (40)
• Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations (69)
• Strength of investor protection (59)
• Egypt best performance is the insignificance of organized crime
• While worst performance is for costs imposed by terrorism on operating businesses
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Ranking out 0f 130+ countries
Macroeconomic stability
23
• Government debt has been reduced following the favorable trend of previous years• budget deficit
remained stable, at and improved rankings reflect again minor effects of the global crises• However, Egypt
continues to struggle with serious challenges
• inflation came as Egypt worst performance in this pillar
• The deterioration of national saving rate ranking continued for the third consecutive year
* Lower Ranking Reflects Improved Performance
Most problematic factors for doing business in Egypt
24
% of Respondents
• Survey of business executives
• From a list of 15 factors, respondents were asked to select the five most problematic for doing business in their country and to rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5. The bars in the figure show the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Reform PrioritiesWorst Ranked Factors
25
Critical Issues:Require Urgent Reforms
26
Ranking out 0f 139 countries
Critical Issues:Require Urgent Reforms
27
Ranking out 0f 139 countries
All Data in this presentation from:
28
Fore more updates and coverage on Egypt Rankings Go To: