eicher motors

2
Introduction Automotive engines are undergoing continuous meta- morphoses. The demand for higher performance and lower fuel consumption has led to the development of smaller, lighter engines. For these reasons, the rigid- ity of the connecting rod has been reduced in com- parison with increasing inertia force. Eicher Motors Ltd., of Pithampur, India, experienced this problem while upgrading four-cylinder engines for improved performance and emission norms. In trying to reduce the weight of the connecting rod, the Engine Development Team had changed the normal rectangular bushing of the small end bore to a trape- zoidal shape. During testing of their newly developed engine, the connecting rod bushings of the smaller bore ends fre- quently became loose. Challenge Eicher’s Engine Design Department called Varun Agarwal, of the Structural Analysis Team, to help determine the cause. With the help of Dr. A. K. Jindal, chief of the department, he began to analyze what an international study of similar failures sug- gested could be “fretting phenomenon.” Fretting is caused by a relative slip between the inner surface of the connecting rod big bore and the outer surface of the bushing, in circumferential and axial directions, as the bushing inside of the con- necting rod big bore undergoes normal cyclic load- ing. The amount of relative slip determines the extent of the fretting damage, which causes the bushing to loosen. Agarwal had to determine why the fretting occurred in Eicher’s engine. Known causes include operating conditions, the shapes and dimensions of the con- necting rod and the bearings, and material and geo- metrical imperfections. Of these, the operating conditions are the most unpredictable and difficult to control. Material and geometrical imperfections are also hard to correct, because of the many restrictions on them. The shapes and dimensions of the connecting rod and the bearing can easily be changed during devel- opment. The only way to understand the problem was to determine the variation in the slip, so Agarwal set out to build a finite element model (FEM) with ANSYS in which he could change the interference India-Based Manufacturer Eliminates Engine Fretting EICHER MOTORS LTD. CASE STUDY www.ansys.com Sliding in ( circumferential direction ) between the conrod and he bush surface, when the load is applied ( at 0.118 mm initial interference ) Images courtesy Eicher Motors Ltd. “ANSYS was the first FEA package in our company, and we were quickly able to show our Product Development Group very clearly how useful it is,” says Agarwal. “On many occasions, FEA was done using ANSYS to ascer- tain the reason for field failure in test vehicles. This helped in reducing the number of test iterations which a new design undergoes, and resulted in sig- nificant time and cost savings.” EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Challenge: To solve the persistent problem of fretting in the connecting rod bush- ing of an engine that was being upgraded for better performance Solution: Use ANSYS ® simulation software to understand the cause of the fretting Benefits: Powerful surface-to-surface contacts Commands that let analysts zero in on the cause of the fretting Key options and real constants that help to define the conditions

Upload: halimsha

Post on 14-Nov-2014

398 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Eicher Motors

IntroductionAutomotive engines are undergoing continuous meta-morphoses. The demand for higher performance and

lower fuel consumption has led to the development of

smaller, lighter engines. For these reasons, the rigid-

ity of the connecting rod has been reduced in com-

parison with increasing inertia force.

Eicher Motors Ltd., of Pithampur, India, experienced

this problem while upgrading four-cylinder engines

for improved performance and emission norms. In

trying to reduce the weight of the connecting rod, the

Engine Development Team had changed the normal

rectangular bushing of the small end bore to a trape-

zoidal shape.

During testing of their newly developed engine, the

connecting rod bushings of the smaller bore ends fre-

quently became loose.

ChallengeEicher’s Engine Design Department called VarunAgarwal, of the Structural Analysis Team, to helpdetermine the cause. With the help of Dr. A. K.

Jindal, chief of the department, he began to analyze

what an international study of similar failures sug-

gested could be “fretting phenomenon.”

Fretting is caused by a relative slip between the

inner surface of the connecting rod big bore and the

outer surface of the bushing, in circumferential and

axial directions, as the bushing inside of the con-

necting rod big bore undergoes normal cyclic load-

ing. The amount of relative slip determines the

extent of the fretting damage, which causes the

bushing to loosen.

Agarwal had to determine why the fretting occurred

in Eicher’s engine. Known causes include operating

conditions, the shapes and dimensions of the con-

necting rod and the bearings, and material and geo-

metrical imperfections.

Of these, the operating conditions are the most

unpredictable and difficult to control. Material and

geometrical imperfections are also hard to correct,

because of the many restrictions on them.

The shapes and dimensions of the connecting rod

and the bearing can easily be changed during devel-

opment.

The only way to understand the problem was to

determine the variation in the slip, so Agarwal set

out to build a finite element model (FEM) with

ANSYS in which he could change the interference

India-Based Manufacturer Eliminates Engine Fretting

E I C H E R M O T O R S L T D .

CASE STUDY

www.ansys.com

Sliding in ( circumferential direction ) between the conrodand he bush surface, when the load is applied ( at 0.118mm initial interference )

Imag

es c

ourte

sy E

iche

r Mot

ors

Ltd.

“ANSYS was the first FEA package in our company, and we were quicklyable to show our Product Development Group very clearly how useful it is,”says Agarwal. “On many occasions, FEA was done using ANSYS to ascer-tain the reason for field failure in test vehicles. This helped in reducing thenumber of test iterations which a new design undergoes, and resulted in sig-nificant time and cost savings.”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Challenge:To solve the persistent problem of

fretting in the connecting rod bush-

ing of an engine that was being

upgraded for better performance

Solution:Use ANSYS® simulation software to

understand the cause of the fretting

Benefits: Powerful surface-to-surface

contacts

Commands that let analysts

zero in on the cause of the fretting

Key options and real constants

that help to define the conditions

Page 2: Eicher Motors

values between the bushing and the connecting

rod.

One of the challenges he faced; the international

study that he had as a guide for the model was

completed more than 10 years ago. The analysts at

the time did not have the powerful contact capabil-

ities available with ANSYS. Furthermore, in most

of the documented cases, the fretting had happened

in the large bore end of the connecting rod.

Solution Using Pro/ENGINEER, the Engine DesignDepartment built a three-dimensional FEM of theconnecting rod, bushing, pin, and piston. The

model was meshed, then imported into ANSYS as

SOLID 45 elements.

Agarwal set up the ANSYS model of Eicher’s

existing small end bushing design for analysis,

using the surface-to-surface contacts in Target170

& Contact174. Contact elements were placed

between the outer surface of the bushing and the

inner surface of the small end bore, the inner sur-

face of the bushing and the outer surface of the pin,

and the outer surface of the pin and the inner sur-

face of the piston. All were given a constant coef-

ficient of friction of 0.15.

The various key options and real constants avail-

able in CONTACT174 allowed him to easily

define the initial conditions.

Putting displacement constraints on the piston’s

outer surface, using static loading only, excluding

transient effects, Agarwal conducted the run in two

load steps.

In the first, he applied an interference of 0.118 mm

between the bushing and the connecting rod, con-

trolling the value of the interference in the real

constant set.

In the second load step, he applied an external

force of 10,600 kilogram force (kgf), from the pis-

ton, onto the connecting rod. Agarwal says, “The

post-processing properties of these gap elements

are very good. To get the final results, I subtracted

the results of the first load step from those of the

second. To find the amount of slipping in circum-

ferential and axial directions, I used the direct post-

processing commands available for CONTACT174

in ANSYS/post1 GUI, and found the pressure and

slip values, as shown in the plots, that resulted

from the external loading, and not from interfer-

ence.”

The pressure distribution on the surface of the

bushing and the inner surface of the connecting rod

showed that the behavior of the model was correct.

The slip between the connecting rod and the sur-

face of the bushing under a load of 10,600 kgf was

separated into circumferential and axial compo-

nents.

Benefits“The best part of using ANSYS was its powerfulsurface-to-surface contacts,” says Agarwal. “The

commands, like Frictional Stress, in CON-

TACT174 in /post1 helped us a lot to clearly devel-

ANSYS Inc.Southpointe275 Technology Drive

Canonsburg, PA 15317U.S.A.

[email protected]

ANSYS is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

©2002 SAS IP, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ANSYS Inc.

All Rights Reserved.

MCS0100AUG02

www.ansys.com Toll-Free:1.866.ANSYS.AI (1.866.267.9724)

Toll-Free Mexico: 001.866.ANSYS.AI

CASE STUDY

op an understanding of the phenomenon. Also, we

were able to locate the critical zone in which the

interference between the bushing and the connect-

ing rod is of most importance. I consider all of this

to be a great capability of ANSYS.”

In additional runs, Agarwal discovered that the

slip drastically increased when the interference in

the critical zone decreased.

Based on the results of the tests, Eicher’s engi-

neers were able to fine-tune the manufacturing

process, and incorporate quality checks, to ensure

proper interference at the critical locations. The

problem of fretting was eliminated.

Since finite element analysis (FEA) is a relatively

new field in India, Eicher Motors has been using

ANSYS for only four years. In that short time,

however, it has become an invaluable tool for the

company.

“ANSYS was the first FEA package in our com-

pany, and we were quickly able to show our

Product Development Group very clearly how

useful it is,” says Agarwal. “On many occasions,

FEA was done using ANSYS to ascertain the rea-

son for field failure in test vehicles. This helped in

reducing the number of test iterations which a new

design undergoes, and resulted in significant time

and cost savings.”

As Agarwal notes, “We have also been using

ANSYS extensively throughout the development

of a new heavy commercial vehicle, to predict

failures in its various aggregates and components,

even before it was put to a field test. It has helped

us to improve the cabin, chassis, and

stubaxle/kingpin designs, as well as many other

parts of this vehicle.”

Beyond the design and testing stages, Agarwal is

looking forward to using FEA extensively in other

areas, including manufacturing, in the near future.

Surface-to-surface contact elements present betweendifferent interfaces.

“The best part of using ANSYS was its powerful surface-to-surface con-

tacts,” says Agarwal. “The commands, like Frictional Stress, in CON-

TACT174 in /post1 helped us a lot to clearly develop an understanding of

the phenomenon.”