electricity in life cycle assessment...environmental life cycle assessment pse 476/wps 576/wps...
TRANSCRIPT
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment
PSE 476/WPS 576/WPS 595-005
Lecture 10: End of Life
Richard Venditti
1
Fall 2012
Richard A. Venditti Forest Biomaterials
North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-8005
Go.ncsu.edu/venditti
Waste Hierarchy
http://www.epa.gov/wastes/nonhaz/municipal/hierarchy.htm
Reduce, re-use, recycle.
• Example: want to understand the burdens of containing
groceries during transport
• Reduce: don’t use a bag, 0 burden/trip
• Re-use (production of bag = 1 burden)
– Use bag once, 1 burden/trip
– Use bag twice, 0.5 burden/trip
– Use bag 3x, 0.33 burden/trip
• Recycle (to recycle costs 0.4 burdens, arbitrary)
– Then for using the bag and recycling once:
( 1 + 0.4 ) / 2 trips = 0.7 burdens/trip
– (data for example only, not meant to represent an actual
process)
3
Types of waste.
• Biodegradable waste: food and kitchen waste, green waste, paper (can also be recycled). – Can be broken down, in a reasonable amount of time, into its base compounds by micro-
organisms and other living things, regardless of what those compounds may be.
• Recyclable material: paper, glass, bottles, cans, metals, certain plastics, fabrics, clothes, batteries etc.
• Inert waste: construction and demolition waste, dirt, rocks, debris. Will not degrade due to microbial decomposition.
• Electrical and electronic waste (WEEE) - electrical appliances, TVs, computers, screens, etc.
• Composite wastes: waste clothing, Tetra Packs, waste plastics such as toys. • Hazardous waste including most paints, chemicals, light bulbs, fluorescent tubes,
spray cans, fertilizer and containers • Toxic waste including pesticide, herbicides, fungicides • Medical waste.
Municipal solid waste?
• MSW: everyday items that are discarded by the public
• Also referred to as trash, or rubbish
• Includes packaging, food scraps, grass clippings, sofas, computers, tires and refrigerators, for example.
• Does not include industrial, hazardous, or construction waste.
Trends in U.S. Waste Generation
Adopted from EPA 2011 MSW Facts and Figures
Trends in U.S. Waste Recycling
Adopted from EPA 2011 MSW Facts and Figures
Current U.S. waste treatment
Adopted from EPA 2011 MSW Facts and Figures 8
136 million tons
Total: 250 million tons
29 million tons
20 million tons
65 million tons
%
%
%
%
Source of MSW?
• Residential waste (houses and apartments): 55-65% of total MSW generation
• Commercial and institutional locations (businesses, schools, hospitals..): 35-45%
Materials in MSW? • Dominated by organic matter, biodegradable
Products in MSW?
Durable vs non-durable goods.
• A durable good or a hard good is a good that does not quickly wear out, or more specifically, one that yields utility over time rather than being completely consumed in one use.
• Examples: Bricks, refrigerators, cars, or mobile phones, cars, household goods (home appliances, consumer electronics, furniture, etc.), sports equipment, and toys.
• Nondurable goods or soft goods (consumables) are immediately consumed in one use or ones that have a lifespan of less than 3 years.
• Examples: cosmetics and cleaning products, food, fuel, beer, cigarettes, medication, office supplies, packaging and containers, paper and paper products, personal products, rubber, plastics, textiles, clothing and footwear.
Source: Wikipedia
Products, Million tons, 2010
Products, Million tons, 2010
Recycling Rates of Selected Products
Adopted from EPA 2011 MSW Facts and Figures
Products with highest % recovery.
• Lead acid batteries, 96%
• Corrugated boxes, 85%
• Newspapers, 72%
• Steel packaging, 69%
• Major appliances, 65%
• Yard trimmings, 58%
• Aluminum cans, 50%
• Mixed paper, 45%
Source: Wikipedia
Landfill: an introduction
Landfill Cross Section (simplified)
Water Table
Liner System
Leachate Collection System
Cover System
Monitoring Wells Gas Collection
Waste
Vegetation
Morton Barlaz, CE, NCSU
Decomposing Waste
Residential Industrial
Commercial Biosolids
Stored Carbon
Leachate (CO2, VOCs)
CO2, Energy Offset
Capture
Gas (CH4, CO2, VOCs)
Fugitive
Emissions
Carbon Flow In Landfills
Morton Barlaz, CE, NCSU
Carbon Footprint
CO2e = fugitive methane emissions + emissions associated with construction,
operation, post-closure and leachate treatment - avoided emissions from energy recovery - carbon storage Notice: CO2 emissions from decay are not counted (biogenic).
Fugitive methane emissions =
CH4 prodn. * (100- % collected) * (100- % oxidized)
Morton Barlaz, CE, NCSU
22
Biodegradable Substrates
• Paper, yard waste and food waste are comprised of cellulose and hemicellulose
• These compounds are converted to CH4 and CO2 by bacteria under anaerobic conditions
• Several groups of bacteria are involved
Morton Barlaz, CE, NCSU
23
Refuse decomposition is affected by: – Climate, surface hydrology, pH, temperature,
operations
Exerts an influence on: – Gas composition and volume
– Leachate composition
Refuse Decomposition
Morton Barlaz, CE, NCSU
Reactor Data: Methane Yields
(C6H10O5)n + nH2O 3n CO2 + 3n CH4
(C5H8O4 )n + nH2O 2.5n CO2 + 2.5n CH4
Cellulose:
Hemicellulose: 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
New
sprin
t
Office
OCC
Coat
ed P
aper
Bra
nches
Gra
ss
Leav
es
Food
Hard
woo
d
Sof
twoo
d
Plywood
(SW
)
OSB
Par
ticle B
oard
Med
ium
Dens
ity F
iber
boar
d
CH
4 y
ield
(M
3 C
H4/d
ry M
g)
Morton Barlaz, CE, NCSU
Copyright Morton A.
Barlaz, NC State
University
25
Methane Production Rate Curve for One Year of Waste
Based on 286,000 short tons of refuse at time zero
and Lo = 1.5 ft3/wet lb (93.5 m3/wet Mg)
0.00E+00
5.00E+05
1.00E+06
1.50E+06
2.00E+06
2.50E+06
3.00E+06
0 25 50 75 100
Time (Yr)
Meth
an
e R
ate
(m
3/y
r)
An example: Paper Recycling
• Paper is collected and sometimes sorted
• The paper is slushed into water, separating fibers, pulping
• Contaminants are removed – Screening – Centrifugation – Washing – Bleaching – Others
• Fibers are then re-made into paper
Source: afandpa.org, 2011
US Paper Recycling Recovery Rate:
• 1999 – Total Paper Consumption: 105 million tons – Total Paper Recovered: 47 million tons – Recovery Rate: = 45%
• 2004 – Total Paper Consumption: 102 million tons – Total Paper Recovered: 50 million tons – Recovery Rate: = 49%
• 2011 – Total Paper Consumption: 79 million tons – Total Paper Recovered: 53 million tons – Recovery Rate: = 66.8%
Source: afandpa.org, 2011
Record high 66.8% RR.
Paper purchases declined (2.3 million tons) while recovered paper increased 1.3 million tons.
Source: afandpa.org, 2012
Paper/board Recovery Rate in the US:
Source: afandpa.org, 2012
Recovered and Landfilled Paper
Where Recovered Paper Goes:
Source: afandpa.org, 2012
19 MMT used domestically, 8 MMT exported,
Purchases increased 7.2% in 2010, Recovered OCC increased by 11.2%
Source: afandpa.org, 2012
Recovery of Corrugated Containers (OCC)
Includes ONP, uncoated mechanical, and coated ONP inserts.
7.5% decrease in consumption of ONP
Source: afandpa.org, 2012
Recovery of Old Newspapers (ONP)
Purchases of PW Papers declined by 5%.
Source: afandpa.org, 2012
Recovery of Printing-Writing Papers
End of Life Example: Catalog Paper
Carbon footprint
End of life: Catalog Paper
Source: NCASI
End of life: Printing and Writing Papers
Paper product Recovery Landfill* Burning and
energy recovery*
Office paper 71.8% 23.0% 5.2%
Catalog 32.7% 54.8% 12.5%
Telephone directory
19.1% 65.9% 15.0%
Magazine 38.6% 50.0% 11.4%
* Landfill and burning and energy recovery ratios are based on U.S. average for all municipal solid waste in 2006 (81.4% landfilled, 18.4% incinerated).
Table 4-5. End-of-Life of Printing and Writing Paper Products
Life Cycle Inventory: End of Life: Carbon in Products
• How much carbon exists in products. Needed for end of life and carbon storage in products. • Half life, number of years for the existing paper in use to halve itself • C permanently stored (in landfills)
Product Carbon content
(fraction)
Half-life
(years)
Carbon permanently
stored
(fraction)
bleached kraft board 0.50 2.54 0.12
bleached kraft paper (packaging &
industrial) 0.48 2.54
0.61
coated mechanical 0.50 2.54 0.85
coated woodfree 0.50 2.54 0.12
average containerboard 0.50 2.54 0.55
newsprint 0.46 2.54 0.85
recycled boxboard 0.50 2.54 0.55
recycled corrugating medium 0.50 2.54 0.55
32.7% to Recycle
12.5% Burning with Energy Recovery
54.8% to Landfill
X % stored as permanent Carbon (100yrs)
Methane
CO2 Burnt for Electicity
Emissions
How important is end of life?
-1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Carbon footprint (kg CO2 eq./BoC)
Total emissions, including transport (kg CO2 eq./BoC):
Of which, total transport (includes all transport components):
Emissions from fuel used in manufacturing (including transport)
Emissions from purchased electricity and steam
Emissions from wood and fiber production (including transport)
Emissions from other raw materials (including transport)
Emissions from manufacturing wastes
Emissions from product transport
Emissions from end of life (including transport)
Total carbon storage changes (kg CO2 eq./BoC)
Changes in forest carbon (kg CO2 eq./BoC)
Carbon in products in use (kg CO2 eq./BoC)
Carbon in landfills from products at end of life (kg CO2 eq./BoC)
Carbon in mill landfills from manufacturing wastes (kg CO2 eq./BoC)
Ctd Mech
Ctd Free
How important is end of life? (ctd free = catalog)
Fuel Mfg End of Life
Paper Recycling: Other environmental impacts (avoid parts thinking):
Life Cycle Inventory: End of Life
• Allocations in recycling.
Two Main Allocation Situations:
• Recycling Allocation: a virgin product is recycled or re-
used in a subsequent life
– There exists operations that are required by the virgin and the
recycled products (shared operations)
– Example shared operations: virgin raw material production,
final disposal
– Many ways to allocate the burdens of the common operations
• Open loop recycling allocation is the most controversial
issue in LCA currently!!!!
43
Closed and Open Loop Recycling:
• Closed loop: material or products are returned to the same
system after use and used for the same purpose again
(Baumann, Tillman, 2004)
• Open loop: a product is recycled into a different product
44
Production of P Use Product Disposal
Production of P Use of Product A Disposal
Production of Product B Disposal
Recover
Recover
Allocation Methods in LCA:
• Example: virgin paper recycled twice and then disposed.
Closed loop recycling example with products P1, P2, and P3.
45
Primary material production
(V1)
Production of Product P1
(P1)
Use of Product P1
(U1)
Recycling of Product P1
(R1)
Production of Product P2
(P2)
Use of Product P2
(U2)
Recycling of Product P2
(R2)
Production of Product P3
(P3)
Use of Product P3
(U3)
End of life(W3)
Allocation Methods in LCA:
• Example: virgin paper recycled twice and then
disposed. Closed loop recycling example.
46
Raw Matl Virgin Prod Collect/transp Recycle
Process
Collect/transp Recycle
Process
Waste
Mgmt
V1 P1 R1 P2 R2 P3 W3
Shared
Operation
Potentially
Shared
Operation
Potentially
Shared
Operation
Not Shared
Operation
Potentially
Shared
Operation
Not Shared
Operation
Shared
Operation
CO2e
Lb/ton
product 300 3000 230 3350 230 3350 2500
CO2e
ton/ton
product
.15 1.50 .12 1.68 .12 1.68 1.25
Table 7. Net GHG of office paper from various life cycle stages from the Paper Task Force (2002, pg. 132), waste management is 80/20 landfill/incinerate.
Allocation Methods in LCA: • Choice of allocation method determines whether virgin or recycled
products are promoted:
• Recycled result is the average of products 2 and 3.
47
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Cutoff MLWMBR 50/50 Closed LoopRecycling
Quality Loss RMAGWT
Virgin Burden Recycled Burden
Net
GH
G, l
b C
O2
eq/t
on
Paper Task Force
Shared Burden
Homework assignment #6
• Using the methods described in HHG to LCA, page 114-119, verify the preceding results.
• Show the individual results of product 1, 2 and 3 and also the average of the two recycled products, 2 and 3, which is the data that appears in the bar graph.
• Show all work.
Summary
• Waste management hierarchy • Biodegradable waste • Inert waste • Municipal solid waste • Durable goods • Non-durable goods • Fugitive Methane Emissions • Steps in Paper Recycling • Recovery Rate • Closed loop recycling • Open loop recycling • Shared operations • Allocation