electronic dialoguing: a peer discussion tool to improve instruction mary swanson engaging learners...

35
Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd Annual Convention Atlanta, Georgia May 8, 2008

Upload: hilary-alexander

Post on 12-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to

Improve Instruction

Mary Swanson

Engaging Learners in LiteracyInternational Reading Association

53rd Annual ConventionAtlanta, Georgia

May 8, 2008

Page 2: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

The Problems

What teaching strategies or procedures could effectively improve the quality of lesson planning for graduate reading specialist candidates?

What teaching strategies or procedures could positively affect the tutee’s performance?

Page 3: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Obstacles

One class of 18 graduate students on campus with no permanent place to tutor.

One class of 19 graduate students off campus (hybrid class).

The professor needed to be in each of the 37 graduate tutor/tutee pairings for each of the one hour of tutoring for ten sessions.

Page 4: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

The Reasons: 74 of them

Page 5: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I know:

National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education :

Standard 1 requires evidence that “Candidates preparing to work in schools as teachers or other professional school personnel know and demonstrate the content, pedagogical and professional knowledge, skill, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn”. (NCATE, 2006, 14.)

Page 6: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I know:

National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education :

Standard 3 requires the unit and its school partners design, implement, and evaluate field experiences and clinical practice so that teacher candidates and other school professionals develop and demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and professional disposition necessary to help all students learn. (NCATE, 2006, 14.)

Page 7: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I know:

The language teachers use in the classroom is a big deal.

Words help form children’s identity. Words help build a sense of self-efficacy

and motivation in children. Words are real and should draw children

to their successes. Words emphasizes knowing and not

knowledge. (Johnston, 2004)

Page 8: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I know:

Teachers must engage in reflection to understand themselves and how children feel. (Bowman, 1989)

Technology is one methodology “not to prove whether or not teaching and learning have taken place, but to improve the quality of teaching and learning, and to increase the likelihood that all members of society will acquire a full and critical literacy.” (Strickland & Strickland, 1998)

Page 9: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I know:

Teacher education programs should teach students critical-thinking skills using collaborative, interactive teaching methods and should invest in new classroom technologies and in faculty development. (McCollum, 1999)

Quality teacher education programs include characteristics such as monitoring, coaching, collaboration, and dialogue. (Anders, Hoffman & Duffy, 2000)

Page 10: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I Know: Theorists and Others

Dewey’s Reflective Practice (1933) Rosenblatt’s Reader Response Theory (1938) Vygotsky’s Notion of “Mediational” Tools

(1962) Bruce (1997); Garton & Wellman (1995); Haas

(1996)’s Transactional Stance Egenberger’s Metacognitive Problem-solving

Behaviors (2002) Alvermann’s quote by Ferguson at CRA’s 2006

CRA Conference

Page 11: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I Believe: Assessment

Formative assessment is a transformational PROCESS.

Formative assessment is a collaborative effort between instructors and students.

Formative assessment ideally is during instruction.

Formative assessment provides assessment-based and constructive feedback.

Formative assessment’s goal is to adjust to improve student’s achievement. (Poplin, 2006, FAST SCASS)

Page 12: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I Believe

The solutions have to be inexpensive and portable.

Blackboard had options:MY COURSES > MIDDLE/HIGH SCH READ : READ5223 (MONDAY 4:30, SPRING 2008) : 1422 > COMMUNICATIONS > COLLABORATION

Lecture Hall Virtual Classroom      

Office Hours Chat      

Page 13: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Solution 1

Blackboard and/or e-mail A communication device to record, save,

and retrieve information. Strengths:

Availability, free to university students Whole group and individual e-mails Collaborative possibilities: synchronously

and asychronously Weaknesses

No audio possibilities No video possibilities

Page 14: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What did I want to see?

Opportunities to affirm, probe, provide explicit instruction, and clarify.

Opportunities to share and appreciate ideas, experiences, and resources.

Opportunities to make meaningful connections and incorporate feedback into professional practice.

Opportunities for transformation from theory into practice.

Opportunities for informative and transformative assessment.

Page 15: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Most importantly, I wanted to see:

Opportunities for metacognition focusing on the importance of inquiry, or systematic investigation of a specific context, situation, or problem. Evaluation of task Evaluation of communication Evaluation of performance Evaluation of one’s current profile of

strengths and weaknesses.

Page 16: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Solution 2

School Based Blog Podcast is a digital broadcast that anyone can

produce using a computer, a microphone and audio editing device and/or software. It is uploaded on a blog.

Weaknesses School server is unable to “save” most of the video

because of space problems. Must be secure Difficult to transfer information from pod to blog.

Strengths Free Supervisor can “visit” each recording session. Supervisor can “record” help sessions.

Page 17: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I Know: Digital Portfolios

Portfolios in teacher education offer many potential benefits for self-reflective teacher practice through experiences that develop understanding of process learning and holistic assessment. (Zemelman, Daniels & Hyde, 1998)

Portfolios can demonstrate competencies with multiple examples in different digital format that can be transmitted and viewed by different audiences in different locations, at different times, and for different purpose. (Wilson, Wright & Stallworth, 2003)

Page 18: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

What I Know:Vodcasts/Podcasts

Virtual Field Trips and Oral History Interviews

Absences of Student or Instructor Instructional Procedures

How to Write a Lesson Plan / Teaching Unit

Introduction to the New Semester Instructional Strategies

Field Experiences

Page 19: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

PODCASTS Decisions

Pod recorders: Olympus Digital Voice Recorder WS-100 Olympus Digital Voice Recorder VN-4100

Server space on the Center for Teaching and Learning, Northeastern State University

Blackboard Link Assessment Guide

Page 20: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

I wanted to GUIDE Metacognition in e-DOL (electronic documentation):

Essential thinking skills and habits Deep understanding and insights In-depth analytical analysis and interpretation Richness of interpretation Improved instruction by focusing primarily on the

positive, not negative experiences. Authentic rigorous assessment Knowledge of self in application and leadership. Two levels of reflection:

Asynchronous chats to allow threaded discussion that encourage quality work, critical thinking and reflection.

Synchronous, or “real time” chats take place online providing for spontaneity in interactive discussions.

Connecting theory to practice.

Page 21: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Strategic Tutoring Checklist

Lesson Objectives and Purpose DRTA Lesson Word Study Lesson Writing Dispositions

Page 22: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Amanda’s Thoughts

The voice recorder was great for helping us watch our time. It was also very useful for writing my reflections over the lesson. I liked the idea of being able to listen and evaluate myself and the things I said to Katelyn as we were reading or doing various activities. I truly enjoyed hearing the laughing and the joking that took place during the sessions. When I first listening to the podcast I heard how confident my voice felt and I liked the idea that even though I may be nervous, I do not come across that way. Katelyn was a little shy toward the idea of being taped but she quickly forgot about the recorder as we started each lesson.

Page 23: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

PODCAST EXAMPLES

Introductory Session - 1 Introductory Session – 2 Introductory Session – 3

Page 24: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Susan’s Comments

I was very intimidated about recording myself. I remained nervous about it for the first few sessions. Finally it just became part of the lesson and didn’t bother me anymore. I felt like I was saying OK all the time and when I listened to myself I found out I was. By listening to myself, I realized that I was not giving Valarie enough “wait time”; I often answered for her. The strategic evaluation helped me a lot in the beginning and then it things became more routine. I think the pod is a great idea for any teacher. You think you are effective but you never know unless you listen to yourself. I want to thank Valarie, Dr. Swanson, and NSU for giving me this opportunity to learn about myself as an educator.

Page 25: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

PODCAST EXAMPLES

Tutoring Session - 1

Page 26: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Steve’s Thoughts

I feel that by using these podcasting techniques it has opened my eyes to technology. Downloading these was an experience in itself. I believe that these are good for evaluations and reading assessments and would be great for assessing in the classroom. It makes available the opportunity for portable assessing. I learned that I do not have as much transition as other tutors while listening to their sessions. I have known this through talk tools and coaching in other classes as well, but I feel that this is a positive thing. One of the ideas that I will implement into future tutoring sessions is more six trait writing. There are a lot of motivational exercises in this program.

Page 27: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

PODCAST EXAMPLES

Final Session

Page 28: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Dawn’s Reflection

I liked the podcasting. It made reflection so much easier than relying on memory. I think this would be a great tool to use in classrooms for teachers to reflect over their own lessons, successes and failures. You can catch things that you missed when you were in the moment and they give us much more information than we could retain on our own.

Page 29: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Problems to Solve

Students’ attitude toward technology 370 hours of Podcasting Turn-around time and quality of

recording Support of technology for faculty and

students. Access to the materials, equipment

and servers

Page 30: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Best Solution

The Reading Clinic is an area with 27 individual recording rooms where each session can be digitally (A-V) recorded and saved on a DVD. Each recording can be saved into a tutoring folder for easy access for both the supervisor and the teacher specialist candidate.

Page 31: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd
Page 32: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

To truly empower teacher candidates, we must

move the responsibility for professional growth from our desks to their desks.

Page 33: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Questions?

Page 34: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Bibliography Anders, P., Hoffman, J., & Duffy, G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading:

Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol.3, pp. 719-742). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Bowman. B.T. 1989. Self-reflection as an element of professionalism. Teacher College Record 90 (3), 444-51

Johnston, P.H. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. York, ME: Stenhouse.

McCollum, K. (1999). Colleges urged to use technology to promote lifelong learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46 (5), A-39.

NCATE (National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education). 2006.Standards, procedures and policies for the accreditation of professional educational units. Washington, DC: Author.

Poplin, W.J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Strickland, K. & Stickland, J. (1998). Reflections on assessment, its purposes, methods, and effects on learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Vygotsky. L.S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozalin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)

Page 35: Electronic Dialoguing: A Peer Discussion Tool to Improve Instruction Mary Swanson Engaging Learners in Literacy International Reading Association 53 rd

Mary F. SwansonAssistant Professor of Reading

Northeastern State University3100 E. New Orleans Street

Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74014

[email protected]