elemental analysis of plant material

36
1 The Hebrew University of Jerusalem The Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences Rehovot, Israel Vasiliy V. Rosen, Ph.D., ZBM Laboratory [email protected] Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

Upload: vasiliy-v-rosen-phd

Post on 15-Apr-2017

683 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

1

The Hebrew University of JerusalemThe Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences

Rehovot, Israel

Vasiliy V. Rosen, Ph.D., ZBM Laboratory [email protected]

Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

Page 2: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

2

After Jones, 2001

1. Introduction

Page 3: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

3

What do we analyze when we are analyzing plants?

Essential elements (major elements and micronutrients)

Toxic elements

Introduction

Page 4: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

4

Essential ToxicMajor Micronutrient

s

Carbon (C)Oxygen (O)

Hydrogen (H)

Nitrogen (N) Phosphorus (P) Potassium (K)

Sodium (Na)Silica (Si)

Calcium (Ca) Magnesium (Mg)

Sulfur (S)

Boron (B), Chlorine (Cl)Copper (Cu)

Iron (Fe)Manganese (Mn)

Molybdenum (Mo) Zinc (Zn)

Nickel (Ni)Cobalt (Co)

Chromium (Cr)Selenium (Se)Vanadium (V)

Silver (Ag)Aluminium (Al)

Arsenic (As)Barium (Ba)

Berillium (Be)Cadmium (Cd)Mercury (Hg)

Lead (Pb)Lithium (Li)

And all micronutrients at

critical concentration

The role of chemical elements in plants (adopted from Munson R., 1997, and Macnicol R., 1985)

Introduction

Page 5: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

5

The levels of major elements and micronutrients in mature leaf tissue (after Munson R., 1997)

Introduction

Parts per million = mg/kg

Percent

Page 6: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

6

Introduction Concentration UnitsMajor Elements

% of dry weightgram per kilogram (g/kg)

Micronutrients and Toxic Elements

Page 7: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

7

2. Analytical Chemistry Basics

Qualitative and quantitative analysis

Calibration and matrix

Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation

Accuracy and Precision

Page 8: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

Analytical Chemistry Basics

Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis

Is there the analyte in the sample?

If yes, which one?

Qualitative Analysis

How much analyte is there?

Quantitative Analysis

ICP: ATOMIC EMISSION SPECTROMETRYAS QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

Unknown Sample

8

ICP : ATOMIC EMISSION SPECTROMETRYAS QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

Page 9: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

9

Analytical Chemistry Basics

Calibration CurveThe calibration curve is a plot of detector response as a function of concentration

(after Munson R., 1997)

Page 10: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

10

Analytical Chemistry Basics

Matrix

Cd, 1 mg/L, in weak acid

Cd, 1 mg/L, in base

Analyte concentrations are equal, but intensities are different

Page 11: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

11

Analytical Chemistry Basics

Limit of Detection

Limit of Quantitation

LOD is the concentration at which

we can decide whether an element

is present or not (Thomsen, 2003)

LOQ is the lowest concentration at

which a measurement is

quantitatively meaningful (Mitra,

2003)

LOD = 3*SDblank LOQ = 10*SDblank

LOQ = 3.3*LODorSD (or δ) – Standard Deviation

Page 12: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

12

Analytical Chemistry Basics

Limit of Detection

Limit of Quantitation

LOD is the concentration at which

we can decide whether an element

is present or not (Thomsen, 2003)

LOQ is the lowest concentration at

which a measurement is quantitatively

meaningful (Mitra, 2003)

FDA, Elemental Analysis Manual, 2014

Method LOQ!!!

Analytical Solution Detection Limit

Page 13: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

13

LOD and LOQ determination on ICP-OES

Observed LOD = <5 ppb

Observed LOQ = ≈ 10 ppb

Analytical Chemistry Basics

Page 14: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

14

Analytical Chemistry Basics

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy is how close a measured value is to

the actual (true) value.

Precision is how close the measured values are to each

other.

after http://www.mathsisfun.com

Page 15: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

15

3. Plant Samples Pretreatment

Sampling Procedure

Decontamination

Drying

Grinding

Page 16: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

16

Plant Samples Pretreatment

Sampling ProcedureWhat to sample?

Mature leaves exposed to full

sunlight just below the growing

tip on main branches or stems are

usually preferred (Jones B., 2001)

How much material to sample?

Depending on plant and

investigation goal – usually tens

(20-100) leaves or small plants

Page 17: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

17

Plant Samples Pretreatment

Sampling Procedure

What DO NOT sample?

After Jones B., 2001

Page 18: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

18

Plant Samples Pretreatment

Decontamination

Tap water

Detergent solution , non-phosphate

(0.1 to 0.3%)

Weak acid (HNO3 1%) – optional

Deionized water

Soil and dust particles: Fe, Al, Si

and Mg. Calcareous soils – Ca.

Liquide fungicides – Cu.

Nutrition solution (fertilizer) –

NPK, essential elements.

Investigator’s fingers - Cl

Contaminants Washing procedure

Page 19: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

19

Plant Samples Pretreatment

Drying Put washed fresh samples in paper bag (or envelope). Do not use plastic

bag since plastic retains moisture, thus accelerating respiration and decay.

Refrigerate (4-5º C) or air-dry the fresh samples if delivery time to

laboratory is more than 12 h.

Fresh plant samples should be dried at 65-80º C in a ventilated oven at

least 24 h (usually 2-3 days) to stop the enzymatic activity. Higher drying

temperature can affect the dry weight.

Page 20: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

20

Plant Samples Pretreatment

Grinding:particle size reduction Different types of mills are available: Jaw, Rotor, Cutting, Knife, Mortar,

Discs, Planetary Ball mills.

Material used: stainless steel, Zr2O, agate, porcelain.

Possible contaminants: Fe, Zn, Al, Na .

Planetary Ball Mill Rotor Mill

Page 21: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

21

Plant Samples Pretreatment

Grinding: particle size units

Mesh is the number of openings in one inch of screen

If sample weight > 0.5 g – use 20 mesh sieve

If sample weight < 0.5 g – use 40 mesh sieve

Page 22: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

22

4. Sample Preparation Techniques

Dry Ashing

Wet Digestion

Microwave-assisted acid digestion

Page 23: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

23

Sample Preparation Techniques

Dry Ashing Analytes: B, Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, P (but wet ashing is more recommended), K, Na, Zn.

Procedure: 500 mg of dry sample digested in porcelain crucible in muffle

oven during 4-6 h at 500º C . The ash dissolved in 1 N HCl.

Element determination: AAS, ICP-AES, UV-VIS (B, P).

Possible problems: easily volatilized elements are lost (Cl, S, As, Hg, Se);

boron (B) may be also volatilized; insoluble silicates are formed and decreased

recovery of other constituents, mainly trace elements; ashing temperature

higher than 500º C may decrease recovery of Al, B, Cu, Fe, K, Mn.

After Miller, 1998

Page 24: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

24

Sample Preparation Techniques

Dry Ashing: Tips and Tricks If an ashing aid is needed, add either 5 mL HNO3, or 5 mL 7% Mg(NO3)2*6H2O

prior to muffel digestion. Dry on a hotplate and then digest.

To prevent Cl loss do the following: mix the sample with lime (CaO, ¼ of the

sample weight) and deionized water to make a thin paste. Dry the mixture, digest at

500º C, dissolve ash with HNO3 or H2SO4 (not HCl !!!)

The following acid mixtures may be used for ash dissolution: 300 mL HCl and

100 mL HNO3 in 1000 mL deionized water; Aqua Regia (concentrated HNO3 :HCL

1:3), HNO3 alone (less corrosive for metal parts of analytical instruments).

After Piper, 1950; Jones, 2001; personal experience

Page 25: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

25

Sample Preparation Techniques

Wet Digestion Analytes: B (teflon vessels only), Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Mo, P, K, Se, Na, S, Zn, trace

elements.

Procedure: 500 mg of dry sample digested with some combination of four

acids: HNO3, HCl, H2SO4 and HClO4, with optional addition of H2O2. Digestion

is carried out in beakers on hot plate, in glass tubes on block, in open or closed

teflon vessels in microwave oven.

Element determination: AAS, ICP-AES, UV-VIS ( P, S).

Possible problems: HClO4 may react with organic material and result in an

explosion; in low Ca tissues CaSO4 may precipitate when H2SO4 is used;

contamination with B and Si when glass digestion tubes are used;

contamination with elements adsorbed by teflon.After Piper, 1950; Jones, 2001; Miller, 1998; personal experience

Page 26: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

26

Sample Preparation Techniques

Wet Digestion: InstrumentsDigestion Block (open digestion)

Microwave Laboratory Ovens (closed digestion)

Ethos I, Milestone, Italy

Ultrawave, Milestone, Italy

Discover, CEM, USA

Page 27: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

27

Sample Preparation Techniques

Wet Digestion: Tips and Tricks Samples with added acid(s) should be predigested at room temperature overnight

to avoid violent reaction at the start of heating. This is especially important for closed

microwave-assisted digestion.

H2O2 may contain Sn (tin) as a stabilizer. Do not use H2O2 if Sn is analyte.

Wet digestion on block has a high throughput, but closed vessel microwave-assisted

digestion demonstrates less element loss and contaminations, and it is less time-

consuming. Increase sample weight for the determination of trace metals (Cd, Cr, Ba etc) to 1 g.

Add internal standard (element that does not exist in your samples, Y or Sc) at the

start of digestion to control preparation process quality.

After Jones, 2001; Miller, 1998; personal experience

Page 28: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

28

Sample Preparation Techniques

Wet Digestion: Tips and TricksInternal standard technique

Page 29: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

29

5. Instrumentation used in plant analysis

X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF)

Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AA)

Flame Emission Spectrometry (Flame Photometry)

ICP-AES/MS

UV-VIS Spectrophotometry

Elemental Analyzer, Chloride Analyzer, Ion

Selective Electrodes etc.

Page 30: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

30

Instrumentation

XRF: X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Principle: Excitation of the sample by an X-ray source,

secondary radiation measurement.

Elements: with atomic number >8.

LOD: 100 mg/kg for major elements (light) and 1 mg/kg

for traces (heavy).

Sample Preparation: drying, fine grinding and

pressing.

Advantages: simple sample preparation; low cost;

portable instrument.

Disadvantages: spectral interferences; method is matrix-

dependent.

Page 31: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

31

InstrumentationAAS: Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

Principle: quantifies the absorption of ground state atoms in the

gaseous phase; the analyte concentration is determined by optics from the

amount of light absorption.

Elements: all the metals.

LOD: some µg/L (ppb), less than 1 ppb – with graphite furnace.

Sample Preparation: dry and wet digestion methods.

Advantages: highly specific for an element; minimum spectral

interferences; low-cost gases used (air+acetylene).

Disadvantages: ionization enhancement of the signal for elements

easily ionized when operating in the absorption mode, especially Na and

K; matrix interferences caused by viscosity or specific gravity differences

between sample and reference standard; elements analyzed one at a time.

Page 32: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

32

InstrumentationFlame Emission Spectroscopy (Flame Photometry)

Principle: excitation of ground-state atoms by propane-

butane flame (2000-3000 ºC), electron loss by analyte atom,

when electron is recaptured, emission light of characteristic

wavelength is emitted.

Elements: Na and K; Li, Rb, Cs, Ca.

LOD: about 0.1-0.5 mg/L.

Sample Preparation: dry and wet digestion methods.

Advantages: simple, quick and inexpensive analysis; wide

dynamic range (0-100 mg/L); ideal for elements with low

excitation potential (Na and K)

Disadvantages: only some elements may be determined;

elements analyzed one at a time.

Page 33: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

33

InstrumentationICP-AES: Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission

Spectrometry

Principle: electrons of excited atoms return to their ground-state and emit electromagnetic

radiation (light) at the wavelengths that are characteristic of the atoms that are excited. Argon

plasma is the source of excitation (about 10 000 K).

Elements: all the elements except gases and some non-metals (N, F, O, H).

LOD: some µg/L (ppb), less than 1 ppb – with MS detector (ICP-MS technology).

Sample Preparation: dry and wet digestion methods.

Advantages: minimum chemical interferences; four to six orders of magnitude in linearity

of intensity versus concentration; multielement capabilities; rapid analysis; accurate and

precise analysis; detection limits equal to or better than AAS for many elements.

Disadvantages: occurrence of spectral interferences; use of argon gas which can be

expensive; instrument is relatively expensive to purchase.

Page 34: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

34

Instrumentation

UV-VIS SpectrophotometryPrinciple

Instrument

Applications:

Kjeldal digestion for total N: determination of NH4 and P in digestate;

Mo and B after dry or wet ashing;

NO3 in water extracts;

Metals: Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn and Zn determination.

b

Page 35: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

35

InstrumentationJust a few words about….

Elemental Analyzer

Elements: C,H,N,S,O.

Digests finely grinded dry

samples.

Chloride Analyzer

Elements: Cl

Titrates Cl- with Ag2+.

Readout range: 10-999

mg Cl/L

Ion-selective Electrode

Elements: K+, Cl-, NO3-

Measures an electrical

potential on the ion

exchanger that is selective

to analyte ion.

Page 36: Elemental Analysis of Plant Material

36

Thank you for your attention!

Questions?