elizabeth harnett - effective governance of quality improvement activities
DESCRIPTION
A presentation given by Elizabeth Harnett at the CHA Conference 2012, The Journey, in the 'Delivering Safety & Quality: Innovations in Clinical Governance' stream.TRANSCRIPT
Effective Governance of Quality
Improvement Activities
Kay BabalisThe Children’s Hospital at
Westmead (CHW)
Why do we need governance of improvement activities?
To ensure Appropriate approval is obtained Ethical considerations are minimised Improvement activities are well structured Accountability and transparency for staff and consumers
involved in improvement activitiesTo support teams undertaking improvement
activitiesTo be able to report on activities undertaken e.g. for
Accreditation Documentation
Why do we need governance of improvement activities? Cont’d
For Information Sharing Avoid duplication Learn from others Maintain history of activities undertaken
To ensure improvement activities align with organisational goals
To increase the number and quality of activities available to enter in Quality Awards
What do you need to achieve effective governance?
• Appropriate policies & templates in place
• Clear process for staff to follow
• Education for staff
What does CHW have in place to ensure effective governance of improvement
activities?
• Policy on Initiating & Documenting Improvement Activities
• CHARLI database
• Improvement Project Review Meetings
What does CHW have in place to ensure effective governance of improvement
activities?Procedure for Ethical Review of
Improvement ActivitiesCGU staff work with the Team Leader to
ensure best methodology is usedCGU & Human Research Ethics Committee
(HREC) work closely together
QI Ethics Approval Process
Activity has potential ethical issues based on
responses to Ethical Review questions in CHARLI?
CHARLI automatically refers activity to CGU for
ethical review
CHARLI automatically sends
activity to Team Leader’s Manager
for approval to proceed
CGU discusses activity with project
Leader and if required with the Chair of the
HREC
Activity approved?
Activity is set to “Modifications Required”
in CHARLI so that the activity can be edited by
the team
Team resubmits
activity
CGU approves activity in CHARLI, and if ethics approval is required a
QIE no. is granted
yes
no
yes
no
Team submits
activity in CHARLI
Team undertakes
activity yes
Manager approves activity
in CHARLI ?
no
Activity to be cancelled?
no
Activity cancelled in CHARLI
End of Process
yes
Improvement Project Review Meeting
Twice weekly 30 minute meeting of CGU staff
Improvement activities assigned to CGU staff member based on their area of expertise
Improvement Project Review Meeting
CGU Reviewers help staff inexperienced in Continuous Improvement
Activity methodology is adjusted if required
Improvement Project Review Meeting
Approval decision is made:Modifications requiredNot approvedApproved with QI Ethics No.Approved without QI Ethics No.Review Only
What is the CHARLI database?
Children’sHospitalAchievementsResearch Links and Improvements
Database
CHARLI is a web based in house built database available to all staff.
Each hyperlink opens a new tab for collecting activity informationdetails
Approval history is recorded
Multiple documents can be attached including EXCEL & PowerPoint
Different
record types can be entered
A series of questions in the Ethical Review Tab determine whether the activity needs an ethical review to be conducted
What sort of questions do CGU ask when reviewing improvement activities?
Ethical Review Questions
What does CHARLI do?
• Assists accountability• Assists ethical review of
improvement activities• Links information • Issues email notifications to staff • Maintains record of improvement
activities undertaken
What else do CGU do to monitor/track improvement activities?
• CGU link all improvement activities to EQuIP5 criteria
• CGU create accreditation documentation in CHARLI on an ongoing basis
• Reports are regularly sent to Department Heads
What about Education/Training?
CGU offers various standard courses such as Evaluating Improvement Activities & Involving consumers in Improvement.
Fact Sheets27 Fact sheets available
on the intranet on topics such as:– Ethical Review– Process Mapping– Charts & Graphs– Surveys– Focus Groups
Links to Fact Sheets are also in CHARLI
How is our governance system working out?
Year No. of Improvement Activities CGU aware of
No. of Improvement Activities ethically reviewed by CGU
2006 87 Data not available
2007 139 127
2008 185 164
2009 385 293
2010 499 354
2011 322 319
up to June 2012
155 123
CHARLI introduced December 2008
KPIsKey Performance Indicator Target
(Business Days)2011 Results
(Business Days)
Days to first contact Team Leader once activity is submitted in CHARLI
3 3.58
Days to complete an improvement activity review - QI Ethics No. allocated
10 10.49
Days to complete an improvement activity review – approved without a QI Ethics No.
5 7.28
Days to complete an improvement activity review – review only
5 6.18
Since 2005 number of Activities granted a QI Ethics Number which were not endorsed by the HREC = 0
How long did this all take?2004 Paper based form used to record improvement activities.
CGU proposed to the HREC that CGU be able to grant ethics approval for quality improvement activities.
2005 CGU grants first QI Ethics numbers.
2006 Due to increasing no. of improvement activities being recorded, decided needed better way to document and monitor activities.
Became evident that as part of the ethical review of improvement activities, CGU was also providing considerable support to staff undertaking improvement.
2007 Implemented a hospital wide policy called “Improvement Activities – Documentation and Approval”, which required all improvement activities to be initiated using the paper based Improvement Activity Start Form.
Began work on the CHARLI Database, to replace the paper based form.
Increasing number of activities being documented so we expanded the number of CGU staff (CGU Reviewers) who could ethically review improvement activities.
Developed “Ethical Review and Approval of Improvement Activities” procedure.
2008 Implemented the CHARLI Database in December.
2009 Scheduled regular training sessions for staff in the use of CHARLI, as well as one on one training as required. Fact Sheets & FAQ developed on CHARLI and Ethical Review of QI.
Regular reports available to Department Heads and Health Care Quality Committee on activities submitted/approved/completed.
Lessons LearntChanging organisational culture does not
happen overnightStructures need to be put in place to help staff
know what theyneed to do
Staff want to have their activities ethically reviewed so long as it does not taketoo long and the process is not too hard
• Staff need help to distinguish between QI and Research
• Staff prefer just in time training
• More work needs to be done with Departments on how to identify which improvement activities to undertake
Lessons Learnt cont’d
What can you do to improve governance of improvement activities?
Work with your Human Research Ethics Committee to agree on what constitutes Quality Improvement/Research
Seek delegated authority from the HREC to approve quality improvement activities
Formalise the process for initiation and documentation of improvement activities by creating and implementing a policy
Create a register of improvement activities:EXCEL spread sheetDatabase
Train core group of staff in Continuous Improvement so they can support and work with teams undertaking improvement activities
Have incentives for staff to complete activities
What can you do to improve governance of improvement activities?
What can you do to improve governance of improvement activities?
Put mechanisms in place for sharing information
Reward & recognise staff by implementing Quality Awards
Feed back regularly to staff & Department Heads
Thank you