EMA2 IDEAS PhD and Postdoc

Name of Home Institution

1. Indian Institute of

Technology, Bombay, India2 (22%)

2. Lahore University of

Management Sciences,

Pakistan

0 (0%)

3. Universiti Teknologi

Malaysia, Malaysia1 (11%)

4. Royal University of Bhutan,

Bhutan1 (11%)

5. Tribhuvan University, Nepal 3 (33%)

6. Other 2 (22%)

Name of Host Institution

1. Mälardalen University,

Sweden3 (33%)

2. Eindhoven University of

Technology, The Netherlands1 (11%)

3. University of Abertay

Dundee, United Kingdom1 (11%)

4. University of Tartu, Estonia 1 (11%)

5. Universitat Politecnica de

Valencia,Spain1 (11%)

6. Universidad Politecnica de

Madrid, Spain2 (22%)

7. Darmstadt University of

Applied Sciences, Germany0 (0%)

Duration of Mobility

1. 10 months 6 (67%)

2. 20 months 2 (22%)

3. 30 months 1 (11%)

4. Other - due to special

circumstances0 (0%)

Which Target Group do you belong to?

1. TG 1 4 (44%)

2. TG 2 5 (56%)

How did you learn about this scholarship programme?

1. Through fellow student 1 (11%)

2. Through colleague/ staff

member at Home Institution6 (67%)

3. Through advertisement in

magazine/ news paper/

brochure

0 (0%)

4. Through internet/ web site 2 (22%)

5. Other 1 (11%)

The overall information on the IDEAS project web site about application process:

1. Excellent 5 (56%)

2. Very satisfied 4 (44%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Information and instructions you received about the final selection and nomination for an IDEAS Scholarship:

1. Excellent 6 (67%)

2. Very satisfied 3 (33%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

The way the IDEAS coordination team replied and was accessibile for futher information during application and nomination process:

1. Excellent 8 (89%)

2. Very satisfied 1 (11%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Availability of information by Home Institution on academic matters (academic strenght of Host Institution; research facilities etc.)

1. Excellent 2 (22%)

2. Very satisfied 5 (56%)

3. Adequate 1 (11%)

4. Not satisfied 1 (11%)

Availability of information by Home Institution on organizational matters of the IDEAS project:

1. Excellent 2 (22%)

2. Very satisfied 5 (56%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 2 (22%)

Availability of information by Host Institution on academic matters(academic strenght and research fields; teaching and lab facilities, English taught courses, international networking etc.)

1. Excellent 5 (56%)

2. Very satisfied 4 (44%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Availability by Host Institution of information, including advising, on organisational matters of the IDEAS project:

1. Excellent 3 (33%)

2. Very satisfied 4 (44%)

3. Adequate 2 (22%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Was the work load at the Host Institution well balanced?

1. Excellent 3 (33%)

2. Very satisfied 6 (67%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Style of supervision and academic support at Host Institution:

1. Excellent 6 (67%)

2. Very satisfied 3 (33%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Supervisor's support and guidance at Host Institution:

1. Excellent 7 (78%)

2. Very satisfied 2 (22%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Supervisor's support and guidance at Home Institution:

1. Excellent 4 (44%)

2. Very satisfied 5 (56%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Did you fulfill the objectives you had set out in your work plan?

1. Yes 4 (44%)

2. Fulfilled most of them 3 (33%)

3. Fulfilled some of them 1 (11%)

4. No 0 (0%)

5. My work plan changed due

to several reasons1 (11%)

Did you attend any courses or conferences during or after your mobility period?

1. Yes 8 (89%)

2. No 1 (11%)

Will you be awarded an academic degree from your Host Insititution?

1. Yes 3 (33%)

2. No 6 (67%)

Was the lenght of the mobility adequate?

1. Excellent 1 (11%)

2. Should be longer 2 (22%)

3. Adequate 5 (56%)

4. Should be shorter 1 (11%)

Did you have difficulty in obtaining a VISA or Residence Permit?

1. Yes 4 (44%)

2. No 5 (56%)

The granted Erasmus Mundus scholarship was sufficient to cover the costs of the mobility period:

1. Excellent 1 (11%)

2. Very satisfied 6 (67%)

3. Adequate 2 (22%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Were the Host Institution's arragements regarding bank transfer of scholarship effective?

1. Excellent 4 (44%)

2. Very satisfied 3 (33%)

3. Adequate 1 (11%)

4. Not satisfied 1 (11%)

Campus facilities at Host Institution:

1. Excellent 4 (44%)

2. Very satisfied 3 (33%)

3. Adequate 2 (22%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Research facilities at the Host Institution in your area of research:

1. Excellent 4 (44%)

2. Very satisfied 4 (44%)

3. Adequate 1 (11%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Accommodation arranged by Host Institution:

1. Yes 6 (67%)

2. No 3 (33%)

Quality of accommodation:

1. Excellent 1 (11%)

2. Very satisfied 4 (44%)

3. Adequate 3 (33%)

4. Not satisfied 1 (11%)

Service at Host Institution offered by administrative staff (International Office, Student Services etc.):

1. Excellent 7 (78%)

2. Very satisfied 2 (22%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Arrangement for your health and liability insurance:

1. Excellent 1 (11%)

2. Very satisfied 4 (44%)

3. Adequate 2 (22%)

4. Not satisfied 2 (22%)

Social activites at Host Institution:

1. Excellent 1 (11%)

2. Very satisfied 5 (56%)

3. Adequate 3 (33%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Did you take part in language course of the host country language:

1. Yes 6 (67%)

2. No 3 (33%)

Your knowledge of the host country language at end of mobility period:

1. Excellent 0 (0%)

2. Very good 1 (11%)

3. Adequate 6 (67%)

4. Not good 2 (22%)

Your stay at personal level:

1. Excellent 1 (11%)

2. Very satisfied 7 (78%)

3. Adequate 1 (11%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Your stay at academic level:

1. Excellent 5 (56%)

2. Very satisfied 4 (44%)

3. Adequate 0 (0%)

4. Not satisfied 0 (0%)

Will this mobility improve your career prospects at Home Institution:

1. Yes 9 (100%)

2. No 0 (0%)

Will this mobility improve your career prospects in Home Country:

1. Yes 9 (100%)

2. No 0 (0%)

Will this mobility improve your career prospects at international level:

1. Yes 9 (100%)

2. No 0 (0%)

Would you recommend the Erasmus Mundus Programme to others?

1. Yes 9 (100%)

2. No 0 (0%)

What is your overall rating of the programme on a scale of one to ten (one is the lowest rating and ten is the best)?:

1. 1 0 (0%)

2. 2 0 (0%)

3. 3 0 (0%)

4. 4 0 (0%)

5. 5 0 (0%)

6. 6 0 (0%)

7. 7 1 (11%)

8. 8 4 (44%)

9. 9 2 (22%)

10. 10 2 (22%)