emba sem i managerial economics session7-theory of consumer choice (1)

Upload: dhananjay-shrivastav

Post on 02-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    1/41

    Managerial EconomicsExecutive MBA Program

    Session VII: Theory ofConsumer Choice

    InstructorSandeep [email protected]

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    2/41

    ACTIVE LEARNING 1:Budget constraint

    The consumers income: $1000Prices: $10 per pizza, $2 per pint of Pepsi

    A. If the consumer spends all his income on pizza,how many pizzas does he buy?

    B. If the consumer spends all his income on Pepsi,how many pints of Pepsi does he buy?

    C. If the consumer spends $400 on pizza,how many pizzas and Pepsis does he buy?

    D. Plot each of the bundles from parts A-C on adiagram that measures the quantity of pizza onthe horizontal axis and quantity of Pepsi on the

    vertical axis, then connect the dots. 2

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    3/41

    ACTIVE LEARNING 1:Answers

    3

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 20 40 60 80 100Pizzas

    Pepsis

    A

    B

    D. The budget constraintshows the variouscombinations of goods

    the consumer can affordgiven his or her incomeand the prices of thetwo goods.

    A. $1000/$10= 100pizzas

    B. $1000/$2

    = 500PepsisC. $400/$10

    = 40pizzas

    $600/$2

    = 300Pepsis

    C

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    4/41

    CHAPTER 21 THE

    THEORY OF CONSUMERCHOICE

    The Slope of the Budget Constraint

    From Cto D,

    rise = 100Pepsis

    run = +20

    pizzasSlope =5

    Consumer must

    give up 5 Pepsisto get anotherpizza. 0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 20 40 60 80 100Pizzas

    Pepsis

    D

    C

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    5/41

    CHAPTER 21 THE

    THEORY OF CONSUMERCHOICE

    The Slope of the Budget Constraint

    The slope of the budget constraint

    equals the rate at which the consumer

    can trade Pepsi for pizza: the opportunitycost of pizza in terms of Pepsi

    the relative price of pizza: price of onegood compared to the other

    $$

    price of pizza 10 5 Pepsis per pizzaprice of Pepsi 2

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    6/41

    ACTIVE LEARNING 2:Exercise

    What happens tothe budgetconstraint if:

    A.Income falls to$800

    6

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 20 40 60 80 100Pizzas

    Pepsis

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    7/41

    ACTIVE LEARNING 2A:Answers

    7

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 20 40 60 80 100Pizzas

    Pepsis

    Consumercan buy

    $800/$10

    = 80pizzas

    or $800/$2

    = 400Pepsis

    or any

    combinationin between.

    A fall in income

    shifts the budgetconstraint inward.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    8/41

    ACTIVE LEARNING 2:Exercise

    What happens tothe budgetconstraint if:

    B.The price ofPepsi rises to$4/pint.

    8

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 20 40 60 80 100Pizzas

    Pepsis

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    9/41

    ACTIVE LEARNING 2B:Answers

    9

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 20 40 60 80 100Pizzas

    Pepsis

    Consumercan still buy

    100pizzas.

    But now,

    can only buy

    $1000/$4

    = 250Pepsis.

    Notice: slope issmaller, relative price

    of pizza now only 2.5

    Pepsis.

    An increase in the price

    of one good pivots thebudget constraint inward.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    10/41

    PREFERENCES: WHAT THECONSUMER WANT

    The consumers preferences allow him tochoose among different bundles of thesame goods he wants, for example Pepsiand Pizza, that best suits his tastes.

    If the two bundles suit his tastes equallywell, the consumer is indifferentbetweentwo bundles.

    A graphical representation of the bundles ofconsumption that make the consumerequally happy is called the indifferencecurve.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    11/41

    The Consumers Preferences

    Quantity

    of Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    Indifference

    curve, I1

    C

    B

    A

    An indifference curve is a curve that

    shows consumption bundles that give

    the consumer the same level of

    satisfaction, such as in points A, B or C

    If the consumption of pizza is reduced,

    consumption of Pepsi must increase tokeep him equally happy.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    12/41

    The Consumers Preferences-MRS

    Quantity

    of Pizza

    Quantityof Pepsi

    0

    Indifference

    curve, I1

    5

    MRS

    C

    B

    A

    MRS is the rate at which a consumer iswilling to trade one good for another.

    It is the amount of one good that aconsumer requires as compensation to

    give up one unit of the other good.

    MRS tells how much Pepsi the consumer requires to be

    compensated for a one unit increase in pizza consumption

    The slope at any point on an indifference curve is the

    Marginal Rate of Substi tu t ion MRS

    100

    200

    30 50

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    13/41

    Higher and Lower Indifference Curves: Indifference Map

    Quantity

    of Pizza

    Quantityof Pepsi

    0

    Indifference

    curve, I1

    I2

    5

    MRS

    C

    B

    A

    D

    E

    Higher indifferencecurves represent higher

    level of satisfaction

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    14/41

    Four Properties of Indifference Curves

    Higher indifference curves arepreferred to lower ones.

    Indifference curves are downward

    sloping. Indifference curves do not cross.

    Indifference curves are bowed inward.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    15/41

    Four Properties of Indifference Curves

    Property 1: Higher indifference curvesare preferred to lower ones.

    Consumers usually prefer more of

    something to less of it. Higher indifference curves represent

    larger quantities of goods than do lowerindifference curves.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    16/41

    The Consumers Preferences

    Quantity

    of Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    Indifference

    curve, I1

    I2

    C

    B

    A

    D

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    17/41

    Four Properties of Indifference Curves

    Property 2: Indifference curves aredownward sloping.

    A consumer is willing to give up one good

    only if he or she gets more of the othergood in order to remain equally happy.

    If the quantity of one good is reduced, thequantity of the other good must increase.

    For this reason, most indifference curvesslope downward.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    18/41

    The Consumers Preferences

    Quantity

    of Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    Indifference

    curve, I1

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    19/41

    Four Properties of Indifference Curves

    Property 3: Indifference curves do notcross.

    Points A and B should make the

    consumer equally happy. Points B and C should make the

    consumer equally happy.

    This implies that A and C would make theconsumer equally happy.

    But C has more of both goods comparedto A.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    20/41

    The Impossibility of Intersecting Indifference Curves

    Quantity

    of Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    C

    A

    B

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    21/41

    Four Properties of Indifference Curves

    Property 4: Indifference curves arebowed inward.

    People are more willing to trade away

    goods that they have in abundance andless willing to trade away goods of whichthey have little.

    These differences in a consumers

    marginal substitution rates cause his orher indifference curve to bow inward.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    22/41

    Bowed Indifference Curves

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    Indifferencecurve

    8

    3

    A

    3

    7

    B

    1

    MRS= 6

    1

    MRS= 14

    6

    14

    2

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    23/41

    OPTIMIZATION: HOW THECONSUMER CHOOSES?

    Step 1:

    Consumer chooses to buy on or belowhis budget constraint.

    Step 2:

    He get the combination of goods on thehighest possible indifference curve.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    24/41

    The Consumers Optimum

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    Budget constraint

    I1I2

    I3

    Optimum

    AB

    Consumer optimum occurs at the point

    where the highestindifference curve

    and the budget constraint are tangent(slope of budget constraint and

    indifference curve is equal).

    Note:Slop of IDcurve: MRS

    Slop of BC: Relative price of

    Pepsi and Pizza

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    25/41

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    26/41

    An Increase in Income-choice of indifference curve

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantityof Pepsi

    0

    New budget constraint

    I1

    I2

    Initialbudgetconstraint

    Initialoptimum

    Which

    Indifference

    curve would

    the consumer

    chose?

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    27/41

    An Increase in Income-choice of indifference curve

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantityof Pepsi

    0

    New budget constraint

    I1

    Initialbudgetconstraint

    Initialoptimum

    I3

    Which

    Indifference

    curve would

    the consumer

    chose?

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    28/41

    An Increase in Income-choice of indifference curve

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantityof Pepsi

    0

    New budget constraint

    I1

    Initialbudgetconstraint

    Initialoptimum

    Which

    Indifference

    curve would

    the consumer

    chose?

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    29/41

    An Increase in Income-Normal goods case

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    New budget constraint

    I1

    I3

    Initialbudgetconstraint

    Initialoptimum

    New optimum

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    30/41

    Increase in Income- An Inferior Good case (Pepsi)

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantity

    of Pepsi

    0

    Initial

    budgetconstraint

    New budget constraint

    I1 I2

    Initialoptimum

    New optimum

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    31/41

    Cases

    What happens when consumersincome level increase or decreases?

    Normal good and inferior good cases

    What happens when price of thegood(s) increases or decreases?(Price effect)

    Assume that price of Pepsi decreasesfrom $2 to $1 per pint.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    32/41

    Price Effect

    Effect1

    Pepsi isrelativelycheaper

    Pizza isrelativelyexpensiv

    e

    Opportunity

    cost ofbuyingPizza ishigher

    Buy morePepsi andless Pizza

    Interaction Effect

    Substitution effect

    Moves to anothercombination of Indifference

    curve

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    33/41

    Price Effect

    EffectI1

    Pepsi isrelativelycheaper

    Can buymore

    goods with

    extramoney

    Jumps tohigher

    indifferenc

    e curve

    NormalGood -

    Buy more

    goods

    Interaction Effect

    Income effect

    Incomelevel

    increase

    d

    Inferior Good- Buy less of

    inferiorgoods

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    34/41

    Price Effect

    Total Price Effect =Substitution effect + Income Effect

    A Ch i P i P i f P i d f $2 t $1

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    35/41

    Quantityof Pizza

    Quantityof Pepsi

    0

    I1

    I2A

    Initial optimum

    New budget constraint

    Initialbudget

    constraint

    Substitution effect

    B

    C New optimum

    A Change in Price- Price of Pepsi decreases from $2 to $1

    Income effectTotal effect

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    36/41

    Utility Function

    Two ways to represent consumer

    preferences: Indifference Curve

    Utility

    Utility is an abstract measure of thesatisfaction that a consumer receives froma bundle of goods.

    Indifference Curve and Utility are closely

    related. Because the consumer prefers points on higher

    indifference curves, bundles of goods on higherindifference curves provide higher utility.

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    37/41

    0

    50

    120

    150

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    Cones per hour

    TotalUtilityinUtils

    Utility Function (Similar to Production Function)

    1505

    1404

    1203

    902

    501

    00

    Total

    Utility(Utility/Hr)

    Cones/

    Hour

    1406

    140

    6

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    38/41

    Marginal Utility

    The marginal utilityof consumption of any input

    is the increase in utility arising from an additionalunit of consumption of that input, holding all otherinputs constant.

    Marginal Utility =Tot. Uti l i ty

    Consumpt ion

    Utilit M i i ti

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    39/41

    Utility MaximizationThe Rational Spending Rule:

    Spend ing should be al located across goods so that the

    marginal ut i l ity per dol lar is th e same for each good.i.e,,Marginal ut i l i ty from X per $ = Marginal ut i l i ty from Y per$

    The Rational Spending Rule: MUx / Px = MUy / Py

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    40/41

    Deriving a Demand Curve

    QuantityofY

    PriceofX

    ($)

    Quantity of X

    Quantity of X

    100

    2001251000

    0

    Px=$10

    Px=$5

    Px=$8

    906550

    906550

    5

    8

    10

    Demand for X

  • 8/10/2019 EMBA Sem I Managerial Economics Session7-Theory of Consumer Choice (1)

    41/41

    Thank you