embedding 48/6 into practice
TRANSCRIPT
Embedding 48/6 into Practice
Gail Brown, Director of Acute Initiatives & Project LeadJames Chan, Manager Quality, Patient Safety and Accreditation Maureen Detwiller, Regional Practice Leader Kathy Williams, Regional Professional Practice Lead Allied Health
48/6 Provincial CCM
Seniors Hospital Care WG & BC Safety Quality Council:
Within 48 hours of decision to admit to hospital, assess
patients in 6 functional areas and initiate a plan of care
(regardless of location)
Primary goal is to prevent or minimize functional decline while attending to an acute medical episode in hospital
2
48/6
Cognition
Mobility
Pain
Medication
Bowel Bladder
Nutrition Hydration
Psychosocial Abilities
04/15/2023 3
Not More Change!!!MoreOB
Hot Stroke
Surgical pathways
ACP - MOSTVulnerable Adult
Ebola
PEWS
ABCDE Bundles New IV pumps
Accreditation
COPD standards
04/15/2023 4
Site Visit Observations
Patient’s Perspective:• Repetitive questions about health history • Mixed messages from staff; “not sure” what’s
next• Passively waiting for health professionals to
“tell” them what they need to do next
Staff Perspective:• Hunting and gathering info takes time away from pt
care• Frustration with communication systems – duplicate
documentation; • Reliance on Patient Care Coordinators for “the plan”• No standardized documentation system across Interior
Health• Every health care provider “starts fresh”• Allied Health professionals are consultants
Site Visit Observations
04/15/2023 6
Eureka!!! The Plan…..
48/6 Stan Dard Documentation
Huddles
04/15/2023 7
Guiding Principles
1. Integrate and embed 48/6 practices – NOT add work to current practices
2. Streamline and standardize documentation 3. Facilitate interprofessional collaboration
across portfolios and disciplines 4. Build systems and processes that are
sustainable and easily measured
So our Evaluation Question is…. To what extent does the application of 48/6 tools and
processes (care planning, huddles) improve perceived shared decision making?
8
Subquestions:
- What is the current level of interprofessional collaborative practice?
- Does the level of interprofessional practice improve with 48/6?
Survey Results Summary
9
Total Survey Responses n=397Complete Responses
n=259
Incomplete Responsesn=129
Blank Responsesn=27
Demographic Only (eg. Q2/Q3) n=70
Demographic + Other Responsesn=32
Terminated Responses n=9
*291 Responses were used for the analysis (i.e. blue boxes)
Key Findings• There are no statistically significant
differences between inter-professional collaboration (IPC) scores at different sized hospitals
– Small (<20 beds)– Medium (20-120 beds)– Large (>120 beds)
10
Key Findings• Overall, there is no significant difference
between IPC scores of nurses and allied health professionals
11
Key Findings
12
Not at all Once per week 2-3 times per week 4-5 times per week 6-7 times per week3.30
3.40
3.50
3.60
3.70
3.80
3.90
4.00
4.10
3.59
3.72
3.84
3.90
3.97
IPC
Scor
e
• The more frequent the inter-professional huddle, the higher the IPC score
Key Findings
13
Not at all For few patients (10-30%) For some patients (30-60%)
For many patients (60-90%)
For all patients3.40
3.50
3.60
3.70
3.80
3.90
4.00
4.10
4.20
3.63
3.70 3.70
3.88
4.08
IPC
Scor
e
• The more frequent a Plan of Care is used, the higher the IPC score
04/15/2023 14
Lessons Learned
• Use multiple approaches – no one model fits• Focus on what staff value in their practice• Find synergies with other initiatives & changes• Build as you go…..leaders do not have all the
answers…….the front line do!• Listen to, and act on feedback
Questions
04/15/2023 15