emergency motion to remove judicial officer m. l. fesak for fraud
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
1/25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDAFORT MYERS DIVISION
DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, Plaintiffs,
versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC
JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;
KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;
RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,
Defendants.
EMERGENCY MOTION
____________________________________________________________________________/
EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT BY
DEFENDANT MATTHEW L. FESAK, N. C. BAR NO. 35276, DOC. # 29,
AND REMOVE SAID UNFIT AND DISHONEST JUDICIAL OFFICER
BECAUSE OF FURTHER FRAUD ON THE COURT
DEFENDANT M. L. FESAKS DECEPTION & TRICKERY ON THE RECORD
1. EXPRESSLY, the Plaintiffs sued Defendant corrupt U.S. Officials in their private individual
capacities, because, e.g., fraud, corruption, fraud on the Courts, bribery, and extortion were
outside the scope of their official capacities. Therefore, the sued Defendants could not
possibly have, and of course had no immunity. However here, Defendant Attorney Matthew
L. Fesak deceived the Court by fraudulently and ignorantly pretending blanket immunity.
See Doc. # 29, p. 5. Furthermore, Defendant Attorney Matthew L. Fesak materially
misrepresented, id., p. 2:
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
2/25
2
Plaintiffs first case was not facially improper, but after a full and fair opportunity to
litigate their case, Plaintiffs complaint was dismissed as unripe because Plaintiffs hadnot availed themselves of state remedies.
Here, bungling Defendant Attorney Fesak, North Carolina Bar No. 35276, was unfamiliar
with Florida property law. In particular, Defendant Fesak was unfit and dishonest with regard
to, e.g., Florida Statutes, Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN; Ch. 95, ADVERSE
POSSESSION; Ch. 712, MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT. Here, Fesak conspired with
other Defendants to perpetrate and/or perpetuate the other Defendants deception and trickery
and conceal fake land parcels, fake resolution [O.R. 569/875], and fake
condemnation claims. No state remedy was everidentifiedhere.
IDIOTIC DEFENSES & CLAIMS OF RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS
2. Here, the named party Defendants, Officials, and Defendant Attorney Fesak knew that no
ripeness requirements had ever existed in order for Plaintiffs to plead, e.g., well-proven
record fraud, corruption, extortion, bribery, and deliberate 1st, 14
th, 7
th, and 4
thU.S. Const.
Amendment deprivations. Here, Defendants and their Attorney gave no explanation or
justification in support of their facially idiotic defenses.
CONSPIRACY TO KEEP PLAINTIFFS AWAY FROM U.S. COURTS
3. Therefore here, Fesak conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently pretend state
remedies which Fesak and the other Defendants and Officials knew to be a prima facie
hoax, because the Plaintiffs could of course plead their ripe claims for relief directly in
Federal Court. Fesak and the Defendant Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that the
Plaintiffs had no intentto exchange their unimpeachable record title but rightfully defended
their ownership against fraud, extortion, bribery, and corruption under color of fake paper
O.R. 569/875.
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
3/25
3
RECORD EMERGENCIES OF CORRUPTION, BRIBERY, AND FRAUD ON COURTS
4. The judicial and Government corruption, fraud, bribery, and extortion on record were
EMERGENCIES, because they violently injured the American people. The Plaintiffs and
American people had fundamental rights to be free of record brazen idiotic Government
oppression in State and Federal Courts since 2006. See, e.g., judicial and Government
concealment of facially fraudulent land, parcel, and condemnation claims and
defenses such as, e.g., O.R. 569/875.
PATTERN & POLICY OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ORDERS / JUDGMENTS
5. Here, no intelligentandfitjudge and/or official in the Defendants and Officials shoes could
have possibly determined that Lee County had any official right to claim land and
illegally fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-
00001.0000. See Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN, Ch. 95, ADVERSE POSSESSION;
Ch. 712, MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT.
THE U.S. DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENTLY PRETENDED UNRIPE CLAIMS
ADMITTEDLY FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF UNRIPE CLAIMS
6. Here, the judicial Defendants conceded the record fraud on the Court that
Plaintiffs complaint was dismissed as unripe, because Plaintiffs had not availed
themselves of state remedies. See Doc. # 29, p. 2
Here admittedly, the Defendants knew and fraudulently concealed that fraud, corruption,
extortion, and bribery of course could of course be directly pleaded in Federal Court:
must comply not only with but also with Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b)s heightenedpleading standard. Id., p. 4.
Here, the Plaintiffs had sued the Defendant crooked Government Officials in STATE Court,
and STATE Court Defendant U.S. Judges John E. Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
4/25
4
themselves had removed Plaintiffs ripe legal action from STATE to Federal Court. Here,
Federal jurisdiction had been admittedly patently clear as evidenced by said Judges
removal. Again, the record showed idiotic record Government corruption. See attached
STATE Court docket, Case # 2006-CA-003185, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Lee
Count Circuit Court.
JUDICIAL OFFICERS FRAUD ON THE COURTS UNDER FALSE PRETENSES
7. Here, the Defendants and Officials fraudulently kept the Plaintiffs away from Court for the
criminal purposes of obstructing justice and covering up for the fellow crooked Government
Defendants and Officials, who had, e.g., concocted a fake resolution, fake land parcels
12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-000001.0000 on the public record.
CORRUPTION WAS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF ANY JUDICIALIMMUNITY
8. The Rules and public policy prohibited the judicial corruption, fraud on the Courts, bribery,
and extortion on the record, which the Plaintiff whistleblowers had conclusively evidenced in
multiple State and Federal lawsuits since 2006. Said record judicial corruption, bribery,
fraud, and extortion were outside the scope of any judicial immunity. Just like vexatious
and vile Nazi Officials, here the judicial Defendants pulled the wool over the peoples eyes:
Judicial immunity provides judges with blanket immunity
Here, said Defendants, Officials, and Attorneys provided the American people with a
blanket of prima facie judicial horseshit for the criminal purposes of concealment and
cover-up.
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
5/25
5
RECORD FRAUD EVIDENCE AND DIRECT ATTACK ON JUDGMENT(S)/ORDER(S)
9. It was a hackneyed truism that res judicata does notpreclude a litigant from making a direct
attack upon the judgment before the court which renders it. A party may of course introduce
fraud evidence
with the direct and primary objective of modifying, setting aside, canceling,
vacating, or enjoining the enforcement of the judgment.
See C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure at 4406. Here, the fake
resolution and land parcels were such prima facie fraud evidence on the public record,
and the Defendant judicial crooks knew and fraudulently concealed that said fake land
parcels had never beenplatted, conveyed, and/orlegally describedin reference to the 1912
Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25.
10. Here, the Plaintiffs were of course entitled to directly attack the prima facie fraudulent orders
and judgments, because as a matter of law, involuntary alienation of private property was
never a legislative function. See also separation-of-powers Doctrine. Just like the Katrina
and Gulf oil spill disasters proved, U.S. Government screws up all the time as it did over and
over in these Cases since 2006.
11. Just like the fake weapons of mass destruction never existed, here U.S. Government
Defendants also employed weapons of mass deception such as, e.g., a fake resolution,
fake land parcels, fake frivolity, and fake vexatiousness. Defendants and Judges
prima facie idiocy on the record was again embarrassing and for the whole world to see.
IDIOTIC & INCOMPREHENSIBLE CLAIM AND/OR DEFENSE O.R. 569/875
12. Plaintiffs lawsuits in State and Federal Courts since 2006 had conclusively proven, e.g.,
fraud, fraud on the Courts, corruption, extortion, and deliberate deprivations under color of,
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
6/25
6
e.g., sham claim and/or defense O.R. 569/875, which the law did not recognize. Here,
Defendants sham defense and/or claim of a resolution (non-existent O.R. 569/875)
were facially idiotic and incomprehensible. As a matter of law, no lawmaker could have
possibly divestedthe Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs will. Any valid
condemnation and/orinvoluntary alienation would have exclusively been ajudicialfunction.
Here, no judicial proceedings and/orinvoluntary alienation ever took place as conclusively
evidenced by the record. Here, the Plaintiffs defended their record unimpeachable property
ownership and title against fraud, corruption, bribery, and extortion. Here, the Defendants
and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that there were no ripeness requirements.
Here, the Plaintiffs were of course entitled to plead prima facie fraud, corruption, extortion,
and bribery in Federal Courts.
DEFENDANTS FAILED TODEFEND AGAINST NULL & VOID HOAX O.R. 569/875
13. Here, the Defendant Officials failed to defend against said proof and allegations on the
record. In particular, said Officials and Judges failed to defend against the idiotic pretenses of
involuntary alienation by fraudulently pretended virtue of prima facie scam and hoax
O.R. 569/875.
PLAINTIFFS SUED CORRUPT U.S. OFFICIALS IN THEIR PRIVATE CAPACITIES
14. Because the record corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion by the Defendant U.S. Judges
and Officials were outside the scope of any lawfuljudicial and/or governmental activity, the
Plaintiffs expressly sued the Defendant corrupt Judges in theirindividual private capacities.
15. Here, public policy demanded criminal investigation and prosecution of the Defendant
crooked U.S. Judges for their crimes on the public record.
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
7/25
7
16. Here, U.S. Officials refused to investigate and prosecute the Defendant corrupt Judges and
Officials for the criminal purposes of concealing said record crimes. Here, public policy had
absolutely required equalprosecution. Here, judges were no differentfrom any other citizen.
EMERGENCY OF PRIMA FACIE FRAUDULENT MOTION, DOC. # 29, 06/30/10
17. In Document 29, 06/30/10, the United States of America, by and through its Defendant
undersigned attorneys, and including Defendant crooked Attorney Matthew Fesak,
fraudulently pretended that Plaintiffs proof and allegations of, e.g., corruption, extortion,
bribery, and fraud were barred by absolute immunity, Doc. # 29, p. 1.
DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF OFFICIAL CAPACITY SUIT
18. Here, the Plaintiffs had expressly sued the Defendants and Officials in their private
individual capacities. See Doc. # 1. However falsely and shamelessly, the Defendant crooked
Judges, Officials, and Attorneys pretended:
Insofar as this is an official capacity suit properly brought against the United Statesand not the individual federal officers See Doc. # 29, p. 5, fn 2.
DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF res judicata
19. Here unintelligently, Defendant M. Fesak, on behalf of the crooked Officials, rambled about
res judicata, Doc. # 29, p. 3:
Plaintiffs utter contempt of this Courts authority, principles ofres judicata, andthe rule of law;
Here, the rule of law prohibited Defendants and Officials fraud, fraud on the Courts,
corruption, and deliberate deprivations under color of sham land and parcel claims.
See Chapters 73, 74, 95, 712, Florida Statutes.
DEFENDANTS ABSURD & IDIOTIC IMMUNITY CLAIMS / DEFENSES
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
8/25
8
20. Said prima facie false pretenses were absurd as easily illustrated and explained by the fact
that judges were and are of course not immune from, e.g., murder or other crimes outside
the judicial scope.
U.S. FRIVOLITY & VEXATIOUSNESS SCAMS AND COVER-UP
21. Just like, e.g., Nazi Judges in Nazi Germany were not immune from prosecution, the
Defendant Nazi-style Officials in these Government corruption Cases had to defend against
their crimes on the public record. Cover-up was not any option. Idiotically blurting out
frivolity and vexatiousness was not any option under the rule of law.
THE PLAINTIFFS WERE ABSOLUTELY ENTITLED TO RELIEF
22. Here of course, the Plaintiffs were entitled to, e.g., equitable relief. Here, said Defendants
ignorance and arrogance were injurious. Here, the Plaintiffs were entitled to defend against
Government extortion and fraud scheme O.R. 569/875.
DEFENDANTS EXTORTED UNDER COLOR OF FACIALLY FAKE O.R. 569/875
23. Here, said Defendants extorted and conspired to extort property and fees under fraudulent
pretenses and color ofauthority, office, and/or fake resolution O.R. 569/875.
DEFENDANTS IDIOTICALLY CONCOCTED LAW [O.R. 569/875]
24. Defendants prima facie unrecognized concoction and/or defense of legislative
condemnation [O.R. 569/875] was an idiotic crime. Here, no fit and intelligent judge
could havepossibly concocted such judicial trash, because any and all involuntary alienation
of property would have been exclusively a judicial function. Here, no court judgment/order
had everexisted, and no law was everadoptedby anyone.
NO immunity FROM GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION & EXTORTION
25. EXTORTION has been defined as
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
9/25
9
"the obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or
threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right."
See Black's Law Dictionary.
"the unlawful exaction of money or property through intimidation."
See Encyclopedia Britannica.
26. Here, Defendants and Defendant Government Officials conspired to fraudulently interact,
defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property and fees from the Plaintiffs
under color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, no Government ever had any
official right or authority to claim any lands. Here, Defendant Officials and Judges
fraudulently concealed the prima facie criminality and nullity of said Government scam
O.R. 569/875.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs again demand
1. An EMERGENCY Orderremoving Judicial Officer and Defendant Attorney Matthew L.
Fesak from these proceedings, because he deceived the Court and conspired with other
Defendants to keep the Plaintiffs away from Court and defraud them under color of scam
O.R. 569/875 and facially forged land parcels;
2. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials from perpetuating the perpetration of fraud on the Courts since 2006;
3. An EMERGENCY Order vacating the facially fraudulent orders and judgments in any
and all Cases of record since 2006;
4. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials from perpetrating fraud on the Courts under fraudulent pretenses of
purportedly unripe claims, because the Plaintiffs rightfully pleaded fraud, corruption,
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
10/25
10
extortion directly in Federal Court and defended their record ownership against Defendants
facially frivolous and fraudulent claims and defenses;
5. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending res judicata and immunity,
because corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous
scam O.R. 569/875 were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawfulactivity
and did not preclude Plaintiffs direct attack on the facially fraudulent orders and judgment
by Defendant crooked Officials;
6. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining theDefendants and Officials from further concealing
the non-existence of fabricated land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-
01-00001.0000, which could not be found on said 1912 Plat in Plat Book 3, Page 25;
7. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending res judicata and immunity,
because corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous
scam O.R. 569/875 were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawful activity;
8. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials on the record from the absurd pretenses of immunity, because of course the
corruption and Government crimes on the record demanded equal prosecution and
investigation of the Defendant Officials and Judges under the Rules and public policy;
9. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and
other Officials from corruptly concocting frivolity and vexatiousness for criminal
purposes of extending prima facie fraud and extortion scheme O.R. 569/875 and
concealing the criminality and nullity of said scam and scandal;
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
11/25
11
10. An EMERGENCY Orderfor the removal of prima facie scam O.R. 569/875 from the
public record;
11. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.
Honeywell from concealing Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of Lot 15A, Parcel #
12-44-20-01-00015.015A, as affirmed and conclusively proven by the public record;
12. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.
Honeywell from maliciously perverting the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record
ownership by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th
Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of
Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);
27. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked presiding Judge Honeywell,
because she disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants,
perverted the facts of record, and could notpossibly be trusted to be impartialand fair, 28
U.S.C. 455; 18 U.S.C. 241, 242 (see Doc. # 213, 2:2009-cv-00791).
__________________________________
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295_______________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro se
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
12/25
12
Defendant Crooked OfficialsReal Estate Fraud Scheme
Fake lot and block numbers such as, e.g.:
o 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;o 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;
Neither fake lot 00A0 nor block
00001ever existed.
Fake Government ownership claims;
Fake transaction(s) such as, e.g., O.R.
569/875;
Fake resolution and law claims;
Fake land parcels;
Fake frivolity defenses;
Fake vexatiousness contentions;
Fake legal descriptions:
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
13/25
13
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
14/25
14
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
15/25
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
16/25
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner____________, who
moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner _____________ and,
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
ROBERT P. JANES
BRIAN BIGELOW
RAY JUDAH
TAMMARA HALL
FRANK MANN
DULY ADOPTED this 29th day of April, 2009.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
(SEAL)
By:Chairman
ATTEST:
Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM ANDLEGAL SUFFICIENCY
County Attorney
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
17/25
11
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
18/25
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 14 of 18
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
19/25
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 5 of 10
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
20/25
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 7 of 10
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
21/25
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!
JACK N. PETERSONIMAGES OF A FRAUDSTER
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
22/25
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 7 of 18
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
23/25
Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 8 of 18
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
24/25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FT. MYERS DIVISION
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT,DR. JORG BUSSE,
Plaintiffs,
v. CASE NO. 2: 09-CV-791-FtM-36SPC
ROGER ALEJO; KENNETH M. WILKINSON;
JACK N. PETERSON; ROGER DESJARLAIS;
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LEE COUNTY
VALUE ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L.
RUTLAND; STATE OF FLORIDA, BOARD OFTRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT
TRUST FUND; STATE OF FLORIDA,
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION; CHAD LACH; CHARLES "BARRY"
STEVENS; REAGAN KATHLEEN RUSSELL;
KAREN B. HAWES; CHARLIE GREEN; BOB JANES;
BRIAN BIGELOW; RAY JUDAH; TAMMY HALL;
FRANK MANN; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY(S);
SEAN P. FLYNN; E. KENNETH STEGEBY; DAVID
P. RHODES; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON; CYNTHIA A.
PIVACEK; JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.; STEVENCARTA; MIKE SCOTT; HUGH D. HAYES; GERALD
D. SIEBENS; STATE OF FLORIDA ATTORNEY
GENERAL; WILLIAM M. MARTIN; PETERSON
BERNARD; SKIP QUILLEN; TOM GILBERTSON,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on five motions to dismiss: 1) Defendants A. Brian
Albritton, Sean P. Flynn, E. Kenneth Stegeby, and David P. Rhodes filed their Motion to Dismiss
Case 2:09-cv-00791-CEH-SPC Document 213 Filed 06/23/10 Page 1 of 23
-
8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Remove Judicial Officer M. L. Fesak for Fraud
25/25
Plaintiffs Complaint is over one hundred (100) pages and does not clearly explain or4
designate the factual bases of the underlying causes of action. Based on multiple reviews of the
Complaint, in addition to the opinions written by the Eleventh Circuit, this Court attempts to
summarize the bases of Plaintiffs claims.
- 5 -
Motions for Change of Venue Because of Proven Judicial Corruption, Bribery, and Criminal
Concealment of Record Absence of Any Lee County Title or Ownership of Facially Forged Parcels
12-44-20-01-00000.00A0" & 07-44-21-01-00001.0000 filed on June 17, 2010 (Dkt. 192); 24)
Emergency Motion for Recusal of Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell, 28
U.S.C. 455, 18 U.S.C. 241, 242 filed on June 17, 2010 (Dkt. 193); and 25) Emergency Motion
for Order to Show Good Cause Why Crooked Judge C.E. Honeywell is Not Conspiring to Criminally
Conceal Governmental Forgery of Non-Existent Sham Parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0" as
Evidenced by 1912 Plat in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25, and Transcript of 11/07/2007 Court
Hearing Before Crooked Chappell filed on June 17, 2010 (Dkt. 194).
I. BACKGROUND4
Plaintiffs allege that they are the owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa Subdivision of Lee
County, Florida (Dkt. 1, 1; Dkt. 5, 1). In a resolution adopted in December 1969 by the Board of
Commissioners of Lee County, Florida, Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land
(Resolution 569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9). See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.
Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);Busse, et al. v. Lee County, Florida, et al., 317 Fed.
Appx. 968, 970 (11th Cir. Mar 5, 2009).
On November 17, 2009, Plaintiff Busse appeared for a quasi-judicial proceeding[] before
a Special Magistrate of the Value Adjustment Board of Lee County, Florida (Dkt. 1, p. 2; Dkt. 64,
Ex. 1). Busse appealed a denial of agricultural classification of Lot 15A (Dkt. 64, Ex. 1, p. 38).
Special Magistrate Lori Rutland noted that although he appealed a denial of the agricultural
Case 2:09-cv-00791-CEH-SPC Document 213 Filed 06/23/10 Page 5 of 23