emily_final_oralpresentation_081911_sp_summer intern ohio_later
TRANSCRIPT
Effects of mixed species cover crop on tomato biomass and
plant disease suppression Presenter: Emily Nguyen1
Brian B. McSpadden Gardener2 and Sun-Jeong Park2
Department of Biological Science, California State University of Fullerton, Fullerton CA
Department of Plant Pathology, OARDC, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Ave, Wooster OH
1
Introduction
• To get certified as organic farming, farmers can not apply chemicals up to 3 years.
• Cover crops rotation can increase microbial diversity & organic matter (Schonbeck and Morse, 2006).
• Benitez el al. (2009)
oMixed hay soil increase tomato biomass & disease suppression.
oMitsuaria & Burkholderia, 2 novel biocontrol bacteria were isolated from mixed hay soils.
2
Intro (cont.)
Cover Crop
Planting time
Mature time
Benefits
Radish Early Spring
Late summer
NR= take up and holds soluble soil nitrogenB= harbors beneficial insectsTS= conditions, mellow top soil
Winter Rye
Fall May NR= takes up and holds soluble soil nitrogenK= makes soil potassium more available
Hairy Vetch
Early fall May N= fixed nitrogenB= harbor beneficial insectsP= make soil phosphorous more available
3
Schonbeck and Morse (2006)
Table 1: Benefits of some cover crops to soil. Letters in bold indicate a strong effect.
4
Winter Rye Hairy Vetch
Intro. (cont.)
Winter rye and hairy vetch cover crops were photographed in May, 2011.
Objectives and hypothesisObjectives:
1) To compare effects of mixed vs. single species cover crops on tomato biomass &
2) Compare effects of mixed vs. single species on plant disease suppression
3) To isolate bacteria associated with plant disease suppression & mixed species cover crops.
Hypothesis:
Mixed cover crops contribute to higher tomato biomass and less disease symptom than single cover crops.
5
Methods
6
Experimental DesignRandomized Complete Block
Mixed Hay, Rye+Vetch Radish, Rye, & Vetch
East Badger, Fry (compost), & Fry A
1) Soil fertility test % organic matter & P
2) Fresh shoot biomassabove ground shoot
weight
3) Bacteria collection ~ 8000 bacteria isolates from
rhizosphere (1/2 R2A, ½ R2A+ Root extract, 1/3 King’s Medium B, &
Leptothrix strain Whole cell PCR
Pathogen inoculation
108 Xanthomonas cells/ml on 1
leaflet
7
Fig. 1: % Organic Matter
Results_ Soil fertility
No significant difference of cover crops on % organic matter
8
Fig. 2: Extractable Phosphate analysis from soil
Results_ Soil fertility
No significant difference of cover crops on P
Results_ fresh shoot weight
Fig. 3: Fresh shoot tomato biomass in July, 2011.
Field
Cover Crop
FryAFr
y
East Bad
ger
Vetc
h
Rye Ve
tch
Rye
Radish
Mixed
hay
Vetch
Rye Ve
tch
Rye
Radish
Mixed
hay
Vetch
Rye Ve
tch
Rye
Radish
Mixed
hay
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
Fresh
shoot
bio
mass
, g
9Plants from mixed hay soil have more fresh shoot weight
Results_ % disease symptoms
10
Fig. 4: Ranking score of percentage disease symptoms Less disease symptom plants from rye + vetch soil,significantly 1/3 fields
11
NC
WC PC
DNA PCDNA PC
WC PC
Mitsuaria_H24L5 Burkholderia_R2F4
Samples spiked with 6ul of R2F4 DNA
100bp L
~450 bp
500400
Fig. 5: Optimization of Mitsuaria and Burkholderia screening PCR.
Results_ Double freeze/thaw whole cell PCR
Burkholderia side, bands matched with positive control bandSuccessful double freeze/thaw screening method
Conclusion
• Tomato plants from mixed species of hay tended to have more fresh shoot biomass.
• Tomato plants from rye + vetch tended to show less disease symptom, significantly in 1/3fields.
• Double freeze-thaw has been successfully optimized to screen for Mitsuaria and Burkholderia PCR.
12
Future Study
Screen and identify potential bacteria isolates using a sequence marker following the method of Benitez et al. (2009).
13
Literature Cited
1) Baysal, F., M. S. Benitez, M. D. Kleinhenz, S. A. Miller, and B. B. McSpadden Gardener. 2008. Field management effects of damping-off and early season vigor of crops in a transitional organic cropping system. Phytopathology 98:562-570.
2) Benitez, M. S., and B. B. McSpadden Gardener. 2009. Linking Sequences to Function in Soil Bacteria: Sequence-Directed Isolation of Novel Bacteria Contributing to Soilborne Plant Disease Suppresion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:915-924.
3) Pal, K. K., and B. B. McSpadden Gardener. 2006. Biological Control of Plant Pathogen. The Plant Health Instructor DOI: 10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02.
4) Schonbeck, M., and Morse, R. 2006. Cover Crops for all Seasons: Expanding the cover crop tool box for organic vegetable producers. Virginia Association for Biological Farming Information Sheet.
14
Acknowledgements• Funding to support the development of these materials
was provided by the USDA’s Organic Agriculture Research and Extension Initiative Grant 2009-51300-05512.
• Many thanks to Summer Research Opportunity Program at the Ohio State University
• Special thanks to Chunxue Cao, Xiaoqing Rong, Veronica Cepeda and Matthew Worth for assisting with field works.
15