empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · empirical...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042311/5ed9397b6714ca7f47695f8a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NGRI, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-7;
e-mail: [email protected]
P-444
Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow
sediment in Kerala- Konkan Basin on the west coast of India
Maheswar Ojha*, Kalachand Sain, NGRI
Summary
During the expedition 01 of Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (NGHP), drilling and coring were carried out at one
site in the Kerala-Konkan (KK) Basin on the west cost to establish the presence of gas hydrate. Drilling/coring results show a
homogenous sequence of oozes and explain that the reflector, which was identified as a bottom- simulating reflector (BSR)
on seismic section, is mainly due to changes in formation density because of less clay content in carbonate-rich sediment.
Wire line logging data collected at this site is of good quality and has been used to establish empirical relations between
P-wave velocity ( Vp), S-wave velocity ( Vs), density ( ρ ) and porosity (Ø). The established relations show very good fit with
high R2 value (>0.7), and would be very useful for further studies in this region. Well known exiting empirical formulas
between Vp , Vs , ρ and Ø deviate significantly from our established relations.
Keywords: Empirical relations, Vp , Vs
, porosity, density, Kerala-Konkan
Introduction
We need empirical relationships between P- and S-wave
velocities ( Vp- Vs), velocity-porosity (Vp -Ø, Vs -Ø),
velocity-density (Vp - ρ, Vs - ρ), etc to predict one parameter
from other parameter that has been measured. Numerous
studies have been carried out to establish empirical relations
between these parameters in wide varieties of sediments
(Dutta et al., 2009; Vernik et al., 2002; Erickson and Jarrad,
1998; Hyndman et al., 1993; Castagna et al., 1985; Wyllie
et al., 1958; Raymer et al., 1980; Gardner at al., 1974). But
these empirical equations are region specific depending on
sediment/rock type, porosity, geology, consolidation
history etc. So, it is necessary to have a regional equation
for fine scale study in a particular area. The site NGHP-
01-01 on the western continental margin of India
(WCMI) in the Arabian Sea was found devoid of any gas
hydrate and free gas in drilling/coring (Collett et al.,
2008). We have used the wire line logging data to
establish the empirical relations between Vp , Vs , Ø and ρ
of the water-saturated (background) sediment of this
particular area for future study. We have compared the
established relations with the well known Vp - Vs relation of
Castagna et al. (1985), velocity-density relation of Gardner
et al. (1974) and velocity-porosity relation of Hyndman et
al. (1993).
Study Area
The Site NGHP-01-01 is located at 15° 18.366’N, 070°
54.192’E in the KK Basin (figure 1a). The water depth is
~2663 m. The WCMI is a typical passive margin that was
evolved during two rifting processes. The first one is a
consequence of the break-up of eastern Gondwana with the
separation of Madagascar, and later one is the Seychelles,
from India about 80–65 Ma (Norton and Sclater, 1979) ago
accompanied by the large volcanism of Deccan flood
basalts (Courtillot et al., 1988; Duncan and Pyle, 1988). It is
of Atlantic type with sedimentation accompanying
subsidence in several areas (Naini and Talwani, 1983). The
continental shelf of the WCMI is more than 300 km wide in
the northern region offshore Bombay that narrows down to
50–60 km offshore Kochi in the south. The surficial
sediment in the area of the drill site on the west coast is
primarily globigerina clay (Rao, 2001). The seismic section
(figure 1b), which crosses the Site NGHP-01-01, exhibits a
widespread but low-amplitude BSR like feature with a
doubtful polarity reversal (marked by circles in figure 1b).
The coring/drilling results reveal a continuous repetition of
clay-rich/clay-poor intervals between ~30 and 10 cm thick
and it appears that the BSR is the same polarity as the
seafloor and thus would not mark an impedance reversal
(Collett et al., 2008).
![Page 2: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042311/5ed9397b6714ca7f47695f8a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density
Data and results
We have used wire-line logging (main pass) P-wave, S-
wave (upper dipole) and density data for this study.
Porosity has been calculated using the standard porosity
velocity relation φ = (ρg − ρb) /(ρg – ρw), where ρg is the
average grain density of the sediment that has been
measured onboard as 2.72 g/cm3, ρb is the observed
density and ρw is the water density (1.03 g/cm3). Porosity
and density data of moisture and density (MAD) analysis
on core samples have been shown in figures 2-3. We find
very low S-wave velocity ranging between 0.2 to
0.8 km/s, which are typically observed in high porosity
(>50%) and unconsolidated shallow marine sediments.
Because of high porosity (>40%), the effect of clay content
in all empirical relations, established for this area, can
be neglected (Castagna et al., 1985). Crosssplot between
observed P- and S-wave velocities figure 2a depicts a
linear relationship as
With R2 value of 0.9505, where the equation
(Vs = 0.863 Vp − 1.1724 ) of Castagna et al. (1985)
deviates significantly from the observed trend. The curve-1
(figure 2a-b), plotted for entire data and the curve-2 (figure
2a-b), plotted for 160-270 mbsf (meter below sea floor) data
(grey dots) are of second order polynomial fits,
indicated by dashed grey and solid grey lines (figure 2a-b).
Curve-1 and curve-2 in -
plane (figure 2b) are
respectively given as
and
Which result in Vp- Vs plane (figure 2a) respectively as
and
Although these fits (curves 1-2) give high R2 value of
~0.95, but curve-1 shows different nature to the curves of
Vernik et al. (2002) and Krief et al. (1990). This difference
might be due to variation in sediment properties.
The second order polynomial is fitted best to the velocity-
porosity trend in the site NGHP-01-01. Figure 2c shows an
empirical velocity-porosity relationship of a second order
polynomial with R2 value of 0.7852 as
Figure 1: (a) Inset shows the location of the NGHP-01-01 drilling/coring site (solid circle) in the WCMI. Thick solid line
represents a seismic line passing through the drilling site. Thin grey lines represent bathymetry at 50 m contour interval. (b)
Seismic section along a small portion of the seismic line in which a BSR like feature was identified (Collett et al., 2008). at
~ 3.86 s two way time equivalent to 200 meter below seafloor.
![Page 3: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042311/5ed9397b6714ca7f47695f8a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density
For comparison, we have shown the velocity-porosity
relationship of Hyndman et al. (1993) as per the following
expression
Figure 2: Observed trend between Vp and Vs (a-b), Vp and Ø (c- d),
Vs and Ø (e-f), Vp and ρ (g), and Vs and ρ (h). Observed trends are
compared with various existing global empirical relations. Plus
symbols indicate moisture and density (MAD) data on core samples.
This shows a significant deviation from the present relation
For predicting velocity from porosity, we have also shown
porosity-velocity relation (R2 = 0.7667) in figure 2d as
We have fitted polynomials of second order to the observed
S-wave velocity and porosity trend by interchanging the
axes (figure 2e-f) to derive the S-wave velocity from
porosity and vice versa in absence of another. A second
order polynomial which best fits to the observed S-wave
velocity versus porosity data (figure 2e) with R2 value of
0.7867 is given as
Observed Vp (black) and predicted Vp (red) from porosity
using equation 2c are shown in figure 3a. Observed
V(black), predicted Vs (red) from Vp using equation 1a and
Vs (blue) using Castagna et al. (1985) are shown in figure
3b. Observed density (black), predicted density from Vp
(red) using equation 2a and porosity predicted from Vp
using the equation 2b of Hyndman et al. (1993) are shown
in figure 3c. In the figure 3d, observed density (black),
predicted density from Vp (red) using equation 4 and the
predicted density using the equation of Gardner et al.
(1974) are shown.
Similarly a second order polynomial is fitted to porosity
versus S-wave velocity data (figure 2f) with R2 value of
0.7498 as
Figure 2g and 2h show observed trend between velocity and
density. For comparison, we have shown the well
known existing relation between P-wave velocity and
density ( ρ = 1.74 ) of Gardner et al. (1974) for velocity
greater than 1.5 km/s. Here we have given an empirical
relation between S-wave velocity and density which fits the
observed trend with R2 value of 0.732 as
![Page 4: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042311/5ed9397b6714ca7f47695f8a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density
Conclusions
Many empirical equations exist in global and regional
scale, but they vary from region to region depending on
physical properties of sediment, depositional history and
geological settings. Present study shows either we need to
have different empirical relations or to calibrate the existing
one to predict one parameter from another measured
parameter in a particular area. Figure 2 and 3 show trends
between two parameters that deviate unacceptably from the
existing well established formula.
References
Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. L. and Eastwood, R. L., 1985,
Relationships between compressional wave and shear-wave
ave velocities in clastic silicate rocks; Geophysics, 50, 571-
581.
Collett, T., M. Riedel, J. Cochran, R. Boswell, J. Presley, P.
Kumar, A. Sathe, A. Sethi, M. Lall, V. Sibal and the NGHP
Expedition 01 Scientists, 2008, Indian National Gas
Hydrate Program Expedition 01 Initial Reports; Directorate
General of Hydrocarbons, Noida.
Courtillot, V., Feraud, G., Maluski, H., Vandamme, D.,
Moreau, M. G. and Besse, J., 1988, Deccan flood basalts
and the Cretaceaous-Tertiary boundary; Nature, 333, 843-
846.
Duncan, R. A. and Pyle, D. G., 1988, Rapid eruption of the
Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceaous/Tertiary boundary;
Nature, 333, 841-843.
Dutta, T., Mavko, G. and Mukherji, T., 2009, Compaction
trends for shale and clean sandstone in shallow sediments,
Gulf of Mexico; The Leading Edge, 590-596.
Figure 3: Comparison of existing empirical relations with established relations is shown along with observed wire
line P-wave, S-wave, porosity and density data with depth in meter below seafloor (mbsf).
![Page 5: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042311/5ed9397b6714ca7f47695f8a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density
Erickson, S. N. and Jarrard, R. D., 1998, Velocity-porosity
relationships for water-saturated siliciclastic sediments; J.
Geophysical Res., Vol. 103, pp 30,385-30.
Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, W. and Gregory, R., 1974,
Formation velocity and density-the diagnostic basics for
stratigraphic traps; Geophysics, vol. 39, 770-780.
Hyndman, R. D., Moore, G. F., Moran, K., Hill, I. A.,
Taira, A. and Firth, J. V., et al., 1993, Velocity, porosity,
and pore-fluid loss from the nankai Subduction zone
accretionary prism; Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling
Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 131.
Krief, M., Garat, J., Stellingwerff, J. and Ventre, J., 1990, A
petrophysical interpretation using the velocities of P and S
waves (full-waveform sonic); The Log Analyst, 355-369.
Naini, B. R. and Talwani, M., 1983, Structural framework
and evolutionary history of the continental margin of
western India. In: Watkins, J.S., Drake, C.L. (Eds.), Studies
in Continental Margin Geology; American Association
Petroleum Geology Memoir, 34, 167–191.
Norton, I. O. and Sclater, J. G., 1979, A model for the
evolution of the Indian Ocean breakup of Gondwana land;
J. Geophysical Res., 84, 6803–6830.
Rao, T. H., 2001, Gas hydrate investigations along the
continental margins of India; Ph.D. thesis, Osmania
University, Hyderabad.
Raymer, L. L., Hunt, E. R., and Gardner, J. S., 1980, An
improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform, Trans.
SPWLA Annu. Logging Symp., P1-P13.
Vernik, L., Fisher, D. and Bahret, S., 2002, Estimation of
net-to-gross from P and S impedance in deepwater
turbidites; The Leading Edge 380-387.
Wyllie, M. R. J., Gregory, A. R. and Gardner, G. H. F.,
1958, An experimental investigation of factors affecting
elastic wave velocities in porous media; Geophysics, 23,
459-493.
Acknowledgements
Authors thank to the Director, NGRI for his kind
permission to present this work. DGH, Delhi is
acknowledged for providing data.