empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · empirical...

5
NGRI, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-7; e-mail: [email protected] P-444 Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow sediment in Kerala- Konkan Basin on the west coast of India Maheswar Ojha*, Kalachand Sain, NGRI Summary During the expedition 01 of Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (NGHP), drilling and coring were carried out at one site in the Kerala-Konkan (KK) Basin on the west cost to establish the presence of gas hydrate. Drilling/coring results show a homogenous sequence of oozes and explain that the reflector, which was identified as a bottom- simulating reflector (BSR) on seismic section, is mainly due to changes in formation density because of less clay content in carbonate-rich sediment. Wire line logging data collected at this site is of good quality and has been used to establish empirical relations between P-wave velocity ( V p ), S-wave velocity ( V s ), density ( ρ ) and porosity (Ø). The established relations show very good fit with high R 2 value (>0.7), and would be very useful for further studies in this region. Well known exiting empirical formulas between V p , V s , ρ and Ø deviate significantly from our established relations. Keywords: Empirical relations, V p , V s , porosity, density, Kerala-Konkan Introduction We need empirical relationships between P- and S-wave velocities ( V p - V s ), velocity-porosity (V p -Ø, V s -Ø), velocity-density (V p - ρ, V s - ρ), etc to predict one parameter from other parameter that has been measured. Numerous studies have been carried out to establish empirical relations between these parameters in wide varieties of sediments (Dutta et al., 2009; Vernik et al., 2002; Erickson and Jarrad, 1998; Hyndman et al., 1993; Castagna et al., 1985; Wyllie et al., 1958; Raymer et al., 1980; Gardner at al., 1974). But these empirical equations are region specific depending on sediment/rock type, porosity, geology, consolidation history etc. So, it is necessary to have a regional equation for fine scale study in a particular area. The site NGHP- 01-01 on the western continental margin of India (WCMI) in the Arabian Sea was found devoid of any gas hydrate and free gas in drilling/coring (Collett et al., 2008). We have used the wire line logging data to establish the empirical relations between V p , V s , Ø and ρ of the water-saturated (background) sediment of this particular area for future study. We have compared the established relations with the well known V p - V s relation of Castagna et al. (1985), velocity-density relation of Gardner et al. (1974) and velocity-porosity relation of Hyndman et al. (1993). Study Area The Site NGHP-01-01 is located at 15° 18.366’N, 070° 54.192’E in the KK Basin (figure 1a). The water depth is ~2663 m. The WCMI is a typical passive margin that was evolved during two rifting processes. The first one is a consequence of the break-up of eastern Gondwana with the separation of Madagascar, and later one is the Seychelles, from India about 8065 Ma (Norton and Sclater, 1979) ago accompanied by the large volcanism of Deccan flood basalts (Courtillot et al., 1988; Duncan and Pyle, 1988). It is of Atlantic type with sedimentation accompanying subsidence in several areas (Naini and Talwani, 1983). The continental shelf of the WCMI is more than 300 km wide in the northern region offshore Bombay that narrows down to 5060 km offshore Kochi in the south. The surficial sediment in the area of the drill site on the west coast is primarily globigerina clay (Rao, 2001). The seismic section (figure 1b), which crosses the Site NGHP-01-01, exhibits a widespread but low-amplitude BSR like feature with a doubtful polarity reversal (marked by circles in figure 1b). The coring/drilling results reveal a continuous repetition of clay-rich/clay-poor intervals between ~30 and 10 cm thick and it appears that the BSR is the same polarity as the seafloor and thus would not mark an impedance reversal (Collett et al., 2008).

Upload: others

Post on 31-May-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence

NGRI, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-7;

e-mail: [email protected]

P-444

Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow

sediment in Kerala- Konkan Basin on the west coast of India

Maheswar Ojha*, Kalachand Sain, NGRI

Summary

During the expedition 01 of Indian National Gas Hydrate Program (NGHP), drilling and coring were carried out at one

site in the Kerala-Konkan (KK) Basin on the west cost to establish the presence of gas hydrate. Drilling/coring results show a

homogenous sequence of oozes and explain that the reflector, which was identified as a bottom- simulating reflector (BSR)

on seismic section, is mainly due to changes in formation density because of less clay content in carbonate-rich sediment.

Wire line logging data collected at this site is of good quality and has been used to establish empirical relations between

P-wave velocity ( Vp), S-wave velocity ( Vs), density ( ρ ) and porosity (Ø). The established relations show very good fit with

high R2 value (>0.7), and would be very useful for further studies in this region. Well known exiting empirical formulas

between Vp , Vs , ρ and Ø deviate significantly from our established relations.

Keywords: Empirical relations, Vp , Vs

, porosity, density, Kerala-Konkan

Introduction

We need empirical relationships between P- and S-wave

velocities ( Vp- Vs), velocity-porosity (Vp -Ø, Vs -Ø),

velocity-density (Vp - ρ, Vs - ρ), etc to predict one parameter

from other parameter that has been measured. Numerous

studies have been carried out to establish empirical relations

between these parameters in wide varieties of sediments

(Dutta et al., 2009; Vernik et al., 2002; Erickson and Jarrad,

1998; Hyndman et al., 1993; Castagna et al., 1985; Wyllie

et al., 1958; Raymer et al., 1980; Gardner at al., 1974). But

these empirical equations are region specific depending on

sediment/rock type, porosity, geology, consolidation

history etc. So, it is necessary to have a regional equation

for fine scale study in a particular area. The site NGHP-

01-01 on the western continental margin of India

(WCMI) in the Arabian Sea was found devoid of any gas

hydrate and free gas in drilling/coring (Collett et al.,

2008). We have used the wire line logging data to

establish the empirical relations between Vp , Vs , Ø and ρ

of the water-saturated (background) sediment of this

particular area for future study. We have compared the

established relations with the well known Vp - Vs relation of

Castagna et al. (1985), velocity-density relation of Gardner

et al. (1974) and velocity-porosity relation of Hyndman et

al. (1993).

Study Area

The Site NGHP-01-01 is located at 15° 18.366’N, 070°

54.192’E in the KK Basin (figure 1a). The water depth is

~2663 m. The WCMI is a typical passive margin that was

evolved during two rifting processes. The first one is a

consequence of the break-up of eastern Gondwana with the

separation of Madagascar, and later one is the Seychelles,

from India about 80–65 Ma (Norton and Sclater, 1979) ago

accompanied by the large volcanism of Deccan flood

basalts (Courtillot et al., 1988; Duncan and Pyle, 1988). It is

of Atlantic type with sedimentation accompanying

subsidence in several areas (Naini and Talwani, 1983). The

continental shelf of the WCMI is more than 300 km wide in

the northern region offshore Bombay that narrows down to

50–60 km offshore Kochi in the south. The surficial

sediment in the area of the drill site on the west coast is

primarily globigerina clay (Rao, 2001). The seismic section

(figure 1b), which crosses the Site NGHP-01-01, exhibits a

widespread but low-amplitude BSR like feature with a

doubtful polarity reversal (marked by circles in figure 1b).

The coring/drilling results reveal a continuous repetition of

clay-rich/clay-poor intervals between ~30 and 10 cm thick

and it appears that the BSR is the same polarity as the

seafloor and thus would not mark an impedance reversal

(Collett et al., 2008).

Page 2: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence

2

Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density

Data and results

We have used wire-line logging (main pass) P-wave, S-

wave (upper dipole) and density data for this study.

Porosity has been calculated using the standard porosity

velocity relation φ = (ρg − ρb) /(ρg – ρw), where ρg is the

average grain density of the sediment that has been

measured onboard as 2.72 g/cm3, ρb is the observed

density and ρw is the water density (1.03 g/cm3). Porosity

and density data of moisture and density (MAD) analysis

on core samples have been shown in figures 2-3. We find

very low S-wave velocity ranging between 0.2 to

0.8 km/s, which are typically observed in high porosity

(>50%) and unconsolidated shallow marine sediments.

Because of high porosity (>40%), the effect of clay content

in all empirical relations, established for this area, can

be neglected (Castagna et al., 1985). Crosssplot between

observed P- and S-wave velocities figure 2a depicts a

linear relationship as

With R2 value of 0.9505, where the equation

(Vs = 0.863 Vp − 1.1724 ) of Castagna et al. (1985)

deviates significantly from the observed trend. The curve-1

(figure 2a-b), plotted for entire data and the curve-2 (figure

2a-b), plotted for 160-270 mbsf (meter below sea floor) data

(grey dots) are of second order polynomial fits,

indicated by dashed grey and solid grey lines (figure 2a-b).

Curve-1 and curve-2 in -

plane (figure 2b) are

respectively given as

and

Which result in Vp- Vs plane (figure 2a) respectively as

and

Although these fits (curves 1-2) give high R2 value of

~0.95, but curve-1 shows different nature to the curves of

Vernik et al. (2002) and Krief et al. (1990). This difference

might be due to variation in sediment properties.

The second order polynomial is fitted best to the velocity-

porosity trend in the site NGHP-01-01. Figure 2c shows an

empirical velocity-porosity relationship of a second order

polynomial with R2 value of 0.7852 as

Figure 1: (a) Inset shows the location of the NGHP-01-01 drilling/coring site (solid circle) in the WCMI. Thick solid line

represents a seismic line passing through the drilling site. Thin grey lines represent bathymetry at 50 m contour interval. (b)

Seismic section along a small portion of the seismic line in which a BSR like feature was identified (Collett et al., 2008). at

~ 3.86 s two way time equivalent to 200 meter below seafloor.

Page 3: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence

3

Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density

For comparison, we have shown the velocity-porosity

relationship of Hyndman et al. (1993) as per the following

expression

Figure 2: Observed trend between Vp and Vs (a-b), Vp and Ø (c- d),

Vs and Ø (e-f), Vp and ρ (g), and Vs and ρ (h). Observed trends are

compared with various existing global empirical relations. Plus

symbols indicate moisture and density (MAD) data on core samples.

This shows a significant deviation from the present relation

For predicting velocity from porosity, we have also shown

porosity-velocity relation (R2 = 0.7667) in figure 2d as

We have fitted polynomials of second order to the observed

S-wave velocity and porosity trend by interchanging the

axes (figure 2e-f) to derive the S-wave velocity from

porosity and vice versa in absence of another. A second

order polynomial which best fits to the observed S-wave

velocity versus porosity data (figure 2e) with R2 value of

0.7867 is given as

Observed Vp (black) and predicted Vp (red) from porosity

using equation 2c are shown in figure 3a. Observed

V(black), predicted Vs (red) from Vp using equation 1a and

Vs (blue) using Castagna et al. (1985) are shown in figure

3b. Observed density (black), predicted density from Vp

(red) using equation 2a and porosity predicted from Vp

using the equation 2b of Hyndman et al. (1993) are shown

in figure 3c. In the figure 3d, observed density (black),

predicted density from Vp (red) using equation 4 and the

predicted density using the equation of Gardner et al.

(1974) are shown.

Similarly a second order polynomial is fitted to porosity

versus S-wave velocity data (figure 2f) with R2 value of

0.7498 as

Figure 2g and 2h show observed trend between velocity and

density. For comparison, we have shown the well

known existing relation between P-wave velocity and

density ( ρ = 1.74 ) of Gardner et al. (1974) for velocity

greater than 1.5 km/s. Here we have given an empirical

relation between S-wave velocity and density which fits the

observed trend with R2 value of 0.732 as

Page 4: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence

4

Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density

Conclusions

Many empirical equations exist in global and regional

scale, but they vary from region to region depending on

physical properties of sediment, depositional history and

geological settings. Present study shows either we need to

have different empirical relations or to calibrate the existing

one to predict one parameter from another measured

parameter in a particular area. Figure 2 and 3 show trends

between two parameters that deviate unacceptably from the

existing well established formula.

References

Castagna, J. P., Batzle, M. L. and Eastwood, R. L., 1985,

Relationships between compressional wave and shear-wave

ave velocities in clastic silicate rocks; Geophysics, 50, 571-

581.

Collett, T., M. Riedel, J. Cochran, R. Boswell, J. Presley, P.

Kumar, A. Sathe, A. Sethi, M. Lall, V. Sibal and the NGHP

Expedition 01 Scientists, 2008, Indian National Gas

Hydrate Program Expedition 01 Initial Reports; Directorate

General of Hydrocarbons, Noida.

Courtillot, V., Feraud, G., Maluski, H., Vandamme, D.,

Moreau, M. G. and Besse, J., 1988, Deccan flood basalts

and the Cretaceaous-Tertiary boundary; Nature, 333, 843-

846.

Duncan, R. A. and Pyle, D. G., 1988, Rapid eruption of the

Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceaous/Tertiary boundary;

Nature, 333, 841-843.

Dutta, T., Mavko, G. and Mukherji, T., 2009, Compaction

trends for shale and clean sandstone in shallow sediments,

Gulf of Mexico; The Leading Edge, 590-596.

Figure 3: Comparison of existing empirical relations with established relations is shown along with observed wire

line P-wave, S-wave, porosity and density data with depth in meter below seafloor (mbsf).

Page 5: Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in … · 2018-01-24 · Empirical trends of velocity- porosity and velocity-density in shallow ... homogenous sequence

5

Empirical relations between Velocity, porosity and density

Erickson, S. N. and Jarrard, R. D., 1998, Velocity-porosity

relationships for water-saturated siliciclastic sediments; J.

Geophysical Res., Vol. 103, pp 30,385-30.

Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, W. and Gregory, R., 1974,

Formation velocity and density-the diagnostic basics for

stratigraphic traps; Geophysics, vol. 39, 770-780.

Hyndman, R. D., Moore, G. F., Moran, K., Hill, I. A.,

Taira, A. and Firth, J. V., et al., 1993, Velocity, porosity,

and pore-fluid loss from the nankai Subduction zone

accretionary prism; Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling

Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 131.

Krief, M., Garat, J., Stellingwerff, J. and Ventre, J., 1990, A

petrophysical interpretation using the velocities of P and S

waves (full-waveform sonic); The Log Analyst, 355-369.

Naini, B. R. and Talwani, M., 1983, Structural framework

and evolutionary history of the continental margin of

western India. In: Watkins, J.S., Drake, C.L. (Eds.), Studies

in Continental Margin Geology; American Association

Petroleum Geology Memoir, 34, 167–191.

Norton, I. O. and Sclater, J. G., 1979, A model for the

evolution of the Indian Ocean breakup of Gondwana land;

J. Geophysical Res., 84, 6803–6830.

Rao, T. H., 2001, Gas hydrate investigations along the

continental margins of India; Ph.D. thesis, Osmania

University, Hyderabad.

Raymer, L. L., Hunt, E. R., and Gardner, J. S., 1980, An

improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform, Trans.

SPWLA Annu. Logging Symp., P1-P13.

Vernik, L., Fisher, D. and Bahret, S., 2002, Estimation of

net-to-gross from P and S impedance in deepwater

turbidites; The Leading Edge 380-387.

Wyllie, M. R. J., Gregory, A. R. and Gardner, G. H. F.,

1958, An experimental investigation of factors affecting

elastic wave velocities in porous media; Geophysics, 23,

459-493.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank to the Director, NGRI for his kind

permission to present this work. DGH, Delhi is

acknowledged for providing data.