employment relations management audit at kutama sinthumule

119
ES fG 1298E EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MANAGEMENT AUDIT AT KUTAMA SINTHUMULE PRIVATE PRISON by JAMES PETER GARRY RABENG submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY in the subject LABOUR LAW AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS at the RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY 2003 Auckland Park SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR W BACKER

Upload: others

Post on 18-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ES fG

1298E

EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MANAGEMENT AUDIT AT KUTAMA SINTHUMULE PRIVATE PRISON

by

JAMES PETER GARRY RABENG

submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of

MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY

in the subject

LABOUR LAW AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

at the

RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY

2003

Auckland Park

SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR W BACKER

DECLARATION

I, James Peter Garry Rabeng declare THAT EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

MANAGEMENT AUDIT AT KUTAMA SINTHUMULE PRIVATE PRISON is my

own work, that all the sources used or quoted have been indicated and

acknowledged by means of complete references, and that this dissertation was

not previously submitted by me for a degree at another university.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost I sincerely thank the Almighty God for extending his

warm hand upon me, for giving me the strength, courage and the ability

to complete this work.

My sincere and heartfelt gratitude to Professor Backer for his guidance,

patience, inspiration, and encouragement during this research project,

without whose expertise this dissertation would not have been

completed.

I wish to express my sincere gratitude to South African Custodial

Management and Department of Correctional Services for granting me

permission to complete the research project.

I wish to acknowledge my great indebtedness to Mr. Ronald Ntuli, Ms

Coetzer and Ms. Nonhlanhla Mathibe, who patiently and

enthusiastically shared with me, their experiences and expertise as well

as proofreading the dissertation.

I owe a debt of gratitude to the Director of APOPS, Mr. Maako and Mr.

Sasebula for making travelling arrangements for me to Louis Trichardt

and Mr. Sekgatle Department of Correctional Services controller at

Louis Trichardt for organising accommodation for me.

I wish to thank most sincerely my wife Kedibone Rabeng and daughter

Boipelo Rabeng for their understanding, support and encouragement

throughout the research.

I am grateful to Ms. Itumeleng Matlala for accurate typing of the

dissertation.

I wish to express my sincere thanks to my younger sister Tsholofelo

Rabeng for assisting me in analysing data calculations.

ABSTRACT

An in-depth Employment Relations Management Audit conducted in

Kutama Sinthumule Maximum Security Prison in order to assist both

managers of the Department of Correctional Services and of Private

Prison to efficiently and effectively apply sound Human Resource and

Labour Relations policies and procedures. The study critically

examines and discusses the perceptions of employees of the Kutama

Sinthumule Maximum Security Prison. The researcher administered

questionnaires to one hundred and fifty (150) employees out of a total

of five hundred (500) personnel. Interviews were held with senior

managers of Kutama Sinthumule Maximum Security Prison who

provided vital information on issues pertaining to privatisation of prisons

in South Africa.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1

ORIENTATION

TOPIC PAGE

1.1 INTRODUCTION 1

1.2 MOTIVATION FOR THE CHOICE OF THE SUBJECT 1-2

4.3 PROBLEM STATEMENT 2-3

1.4 AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 3

1.4.1 AIM 3

1.4.2 OBJECTIVES 3

1.5 RESEARCH METHOD 3-4

1.6 RESEARCH PROCEDURE AND STRATEGY 4

1.6.1 DATA COLLECTION 4

1.6.2 STRATEGY 4

1.6.3 LITERATURE STUDY 4-5

1.6.4 CONSULTATION WITH EXPERTS 5

1.6.5 DOCUMENTARY METHODS 5

1.7 DEFINITION OF KEY CONCEPTS 5

1.7.1 KEY CONCEPTS 6-7

1.8 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 7

1.9 CONTENTS OF RESEARCH REPORT 7-8

CHAPTER 2

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE PRISON IN SOUTH

AFRICA

2.1 INTRODUCTION 9-11

2.2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 11-12

2,3 PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP 12-13

2.4 THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYMENT LAW ON 13

EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

2.4.1 GOVERNMENT POLICY AND THE 14-15

CONSTITUTION

2.4.2 EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT, 1998 15-16

(ACT 55 OF 1998)

2.4.3 THE IMPACT OF THE ACT ON HUMAN 16-17

RESOURCES

2.4.4 BASIC CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT ACT 17-19

1997(Act 75 of 1997)

2.4.5 LABOUR RELATIONS ACT, 1995 19-20

(ACT 66 OF 1995)

2.4.5.1 FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION AND GENERAL 20-21

PROTECTION

2.4.5.2 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING 21

2.4.5.3 ORGANISATIONAL RIGHTS 21

2.4.5.3.1 TRADE UNION ACCESS TO WORKPLACE 21

2.4.5.3.2 LEAVE FOR TRADE UNION ACTIVITIES 21-22

2.4.5.3.3 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION 22

2.4.5.4 STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS 22

2.4.5.5 ESSENTIAL AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES 23-24

24.5.6 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 24

2.5 SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1998 24-25

(ACT 97 OF 1998)

2.6 CONCLUSION 25-26

CHAPTER 3

PRISON SYSTEM IN THE MODERN ERA AND CURRENT STATE OF

SOUTH AFRICAN PRISONS

TOPIC PAGE

3.1 INTRODUCTION 27-29

3.2 CURRENT STATE OF SOUTH AFRICAN 29-31

PRISONS

3.3 THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL 31-32

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES AND CRIMINAL

JUSTICE

3.4 CONCLUSION 32

CHAPTER 4

PRISON PRIVATISATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

TOPIC PAGE

4.1 INTRODUCTION 33

4.2 PRIVATISATION 33- 34

4.3 TYPES OF PRISON PRIVATISATION 34- 35

4.4 PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS 35

4.5 PROS AND CONS OF PRIVATISATION 36

4.5.1 PROPRIETY 36- 37

4.5.2 COST 37-38

4.5.3 QUALITY 38

4.5.4 SECURITY 38-39

4.5.5 CORRUPTION 39-340

4.6 ARGUMENTS FOR PRISON 40- 42

PRIVATISATION

4.7 CONCLUSION 42

CHAPTER 5

EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MANAGEMENT AUDIT

TOPIC

PAGE

5.1 INTRODUCTION

5.2 DEFINITION OF EMPLOYMENT

RELATIONS MANAGEMENT AUDIT

5.3 EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

MANAGEMENT AUDIT AS A

MEASURING INSTRUMENT

5.4 ASSESSMENT OF THE NEED FOR

5,5 IMPLEMENTATION OF REMEDIAL

ACTION

5.6 CONCLUSION

43

43- 44

44-45

45- 46

46

46

CHAPTER 6

INVESTIGATION

TOPIC PAGE

6.1 INTRODUCTION 47

6.2 SAMPLE USED DURING THE RESEARCH 47-48

6.2.1 REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE 48

6.2.2 SAMPLE ANALYSIS OF MANAGEMENT 48-50

6.2.3 DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS OF EMPLOYEES 50-51

6.3 MEASURING INSTRUMENT USED DURING 51-52

RESEARCH

6.4 APPLICATION OF QUESTIONNAIRE 52

CHAPTER 7

RESULTS

7.1 RESPONSE BY PRISON DIRECTOR 53-56

7.2 RESPONSE BY CHAIRPERSON OF WORK 56-57

COUNCIL

7.3 RESPONSE BY HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGER 57-58

7.4 RESPONSE OF MANAGERS ON

58-65

QUESTIONNAIRE

7.5 RESPONSE OF EMPLOYEES ON

65-72

QUESTIONNAIRES

CHAPTER 8

INTERPRETATION

8.1 MANAGEMENT RESPONSES TO

73-77

OUESTIONNAIRE

8.2 EMPLOYEE RESPONSES TO

77-81

OUESTIONNAIRE

CHAPTER 9

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT

RELATIONS MANAGEMENT AUDIT CONDUCTED IN KUTAMA

SINTHUMULE PRIVATE PRISON

9.1 INTRODUCTION 82

9.2 AIM OF THE STUDY 82

9.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 82-83

9.4 CONCLUSION OF THE RESEARCH 83-84

FINDINGS

9.5 DISCREPANCIES IN MANAGEMENT 84-

PROCEDURE

9.6 BRIEF SUMMARY OF AN AUDIT 84

9.7 RECOMMENDATIONS 84

9.7.1 EQUITY AND DISCRIMINATION 85

9.8 WORK COUNCIL 85-86

9.9 PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 86

9.10 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 86-87

9.11 MANAGEMENT STYLE 87

9.12 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 87

9.13 TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 87

9.14 HUMAN RESOURCE 87

9.15 CONCLUSION

88

BIBLIOGRAPHY

89-92

ANNEXURE A

ANNEXURE B

CHAPTER 1

ORIENTATION

1.1 Introduction

As the title denotes, this dissertation aims to explain and evaluate

employment relations management procedures and processes in Kutama-

Sinthumule private prison.

In this chapter, attention will be given to the following aspects in motivations

for the choice of the subject, problem statement, aim and objectives of the

study, research methods, research procedure and strategy, literature study,

limitations of the study and contents of research report

1.2 Motivation for the Choice of the Subject

A variety of factors motivated the researcher to pursue this research study.

The study stemmed from the researcher's practicum as part of the Rand

Afrikaans University's requirements for the degree Masters philosophy in

employment relations and labour law.

The researcher also works in the Department of Correctional Services and

serves as a Senior Shop steward of POPCRU (Police and Prisons Civil

Rights Union) at the Department's Head Office.

Prison privatisation in South Africa is a fairly new venture. The Department

of Correctional Services entered into the Public Private Partnership. In

terms of the Assets Procurement and Operating Partnership System

(Apops), prisons were constructed by and are currently operated by private

companies, they are:

• Mangaung Maximum Security Prison (Bloemfontein)

1

• Kutama Sinthumule Maximum Security Prison (Louis Trichard). This

private venture the contents thereof will be discussed in Chapter 4.

Since the researcher realised that there are currently no labour

organizations operating in South African Private Prisons and a great

number of employees have been appointed from both outside and inside

the Department of Correctional Services. There is a need to audit the

policies and procedures applicable in the Private Prison (Kutama

Sinthumule) in order to explore the attitudes, opinions and perceptions of

employees with regard to various factors relating to the employment

relationship and which can influence the quality of employment relations.

In brief, the researcher has been interest in the area of employment

relations management audit and envisages that this audit will contribute not

only to the development of employment relations management, in Kutama

Sinthumule, but also to the Department of Correctional Services as well as

their contract relationship with Private companies owning private prisons.

1.3 Problem Statement

Since there are no labour organisations presently operating in South African

Private Prisons, there is a possibility that employment relations

management policies and procedures may be affected negatively.

Therefore, there is a need to conduct employment relations management

audit in Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison.

This study aimed at exploring and evaluating the employment relations

management processes in Kutama Sinthumule. The questions to be

answered were the following:

• Are employment relations policies and procedures available?

2

If policies and procedures are available, are they managed in such a

way that they add value to the quantity and quality of services rendered

in the Private Prison?

Is there a further need for improvement in the future management of

employment relations?

1.4 Aim And Objectives Of The Study

1.4.1 Aim

The aim of the research is to determine employees' attitudes, opinions,

expectations and perceptions with regard to various factors relating to the

employment relationship and which can influence the quality of employment

relations.

1.4.2 Objectives

The objectives of this study are to:

describe the employees' attitude towards South Africa's private prison.

determine whether employment relations management processes and

procedures are effectively applied within the private prison.

evaluate whether there are discrepancies in the application of the

management processes and procedures, which may have a negative

impact on the functioning of employees in the private prison.

1.5 Research Method

The nature of this audit was to evaluate the actual employee satisfaction

levels. In this regard one focuses on the quality of the actual "match" in

employment relationships with the organisation; how they experience their

employment relationships. The focus was to survey the opinions, feelings,

attitudes of the employees regarding the employment relations

management in Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison.

3

Any monitor and audit process will be useless, if it only points out

deficiencies. The underlying objective of the process is to take corrective

action and therefore it must also provide for the implementation of remedial

action (Slabbert et al 1998: 23-60).

Much of the research, especially in developing prisons like Kutama-

Sinthumule sets out to explore new areas, about which little is known in the

local context (Peil M. 1982, P.11). The nature of this study is therefore

exploratory. The research will add to the understanding of the employment

relations management and the control thereof, furthermore the researcher

will be exploring responses from employees and management personnel

concerning their understanding of the role of employment relations

subsystem in the organisation.

1.6 Research Procedure And Strategy

1.6.1 Data Collection

Data was gathered from literature, documents, questionnaires and

interviews.

1.6.2 Strategy

Structured interviews were conducted with various experts from Kutama-

Sinthumule Private Prison and questionnaires were administered to

management personnel and employees at Kutama-Sinthumule. These

comprises of the Prison Director, Human Resource Manager, Unit Manager,

Social workers, Psychologist, Nursing staff, Educational/Programme staff

and custodial staff, together with the Chairperson of the work council.

4

1.6.3 Literature Study

The relevant literature sources from different fields of study were consulted

and referred to. These fields of study are Prison Privatisation, Employment

relations management, Labour law, Social work, and Correctional Services

documents. In addition researcher's practical experience as a Correctional

official and a shop steward in a Correctional setting; was applied.

1.6.4 Consultation with experts

The researcher consulted with experts from the Departments of

Correctional Services and Public Works to gain general background on the

formation of Public Prison Privatisation.

1.6.5 Dccumentary methods

A research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and

analysis of data in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the research

purpose; with economy in procedure (Mouton and Marais 1988:32).

The researcher first made a thorough study of documentary sources,

including, among other things, books, periodical journals, Act of Parliament,

magazines, reports and newspapers, collected from the library of the

University of South Africa, and the library of Correctional Services

Headquarters, and information downloaded form the website.

Documentary sources may be either primary or secondary for additional

information; the researcher can turn to unpublished sources such as theses,

dissertations, and reports on research projects (Van der Walt et al, 1977:

214).

Documentary studies are essentially a study of the literature on a specific

problem or phenomenon (Neser, Cilliers and Swart 1985: 205).

5

1.7 Definition of Key Concepts

For the purpose of clarity, the following key concepts will be defined:

1.7.1 Key Concepts

1.7.1.1 APOPS

APOPS means Assets Procurement and Operating Partnership Systems.

1.7.1.2 Employment Relations Management Audit

A survey of a company's human resource and industrial relations policies,

procedures, processes, and practices.

1.7.1.3 DCS

DCS means the Department of Correctional Services

1.7.1.4 Privatisation

Privatisation refers to the once of sale of public assets to the private sector.

1.7.1.5 POPCRU

Poperu means the Police and Prison Civil Rights Union

1.7.1.6 SACM

SACM means South African Custodial Management which operates private

prisons in South Africa.

6

1.7.1.7 Custodial Officer

A custodial official is an employee of the Department of Correctional

Services or Private Prisons in South Africa.

1.7.1.8 Unit Manager

The unit manager is a person who is in charge of a unit, directs and

manages the unit within the confines of the major institution.

1.8 Limitations of the Study

First of all it was very difficult for the Department of Correctional Services to

approve the research proposal. No research was conducted in the Private

Prison before. The Mangaung Maximum Private Prison disapproved the

research proposal but Kutama-Sinthumule accepted it with Correctional

Services.

The second very important limitation was that of waiting for more than four

months since the department was re-evaluating its research policy.

The third limitation was difficulty in finding the respondents at Kutama-

Sinthumule due to their work shifts and prison design that compelled most

of the employees to take the questionnaires home and return with them the

following day. Employees were afraid to fill in questionnaires for fear of

reprisal.

1.9 Contents of Research Report

This research study is presented in seven chapters as follows:

Chapter 1 deals with the following components:

7

General introduction including the motivation for the choice of the subject,

the formulation of the problem, aim and objectives of the study, the

hypothesis statement, research methodology, a description of the research

population, definition or key concepts and limitations of the research.

Chapter 2 discusses the historical development of the privatisation of

prisons in South Africa and the impact of employment on employment

relationships.

Chapter 3 handles the overview of prison system, as it had developed in the

modern era and the current state of South African Prisons.

Chapter 4 gives an exposition of prison privatisation

Chapter 5 outlines the theoretical perspective or the employment relations

management audit.

Chapter 6 summarises the employment relations management audit in

Kutama-Sinthumule Private prison, it will also entail the scope of the audit,

approach and the rationale of the employment relations management audit.

Chapter 7 includes conclusions and recommendations for employment

relations management audit.

Chapter 8 interprets the research findings.

Chapter 9 presents conclusions and recommendations of the research

audit.

8

CHAPTER 2

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE PRISON IN SOUTH AFRICA

2.1 Introduction

The privatisation of prisons is the latest, albeit unfinished, chapter in the

history of penal reform in South Africa. Like most previous Penal Reform

Movements the privatisation movement can be understood as a response to

escalating costs, and rising prison population.

Like previous generations of penal reformers, a mixture of self-interest and

high ideals motivated privatisation of prisons. On the one hand, they are

out to make money for themselves, and their investors, on the other hand,

they seem convinced that they can help to improve this country's ailing

correction complex. They pledge to operate in an abuse and corruption free

manner, and they claim that their ultimate mission is to make prisons safer,

cleaner, more productive, more lawful and less expensive to build, financed

and administer.

The thrust of this research has throughout been that employment relations

ought to be managed in such a way that this organisational subsystem

enhances the competitiveness of an organisation; hence there was a need

for employment relations management audit in the private prisons. This

means that the employment relations system of any organization has to be

managed in such a way that the outputs thereof actually add value to the

quantity and quality of products delivered or services rendered by the

9

organization. The outputs of the employment relations system in any

organization ought to be evaluated in this context and to what extent does it

contribute to the competitiveness of the organization?

Control as a management function is defined by Robbins and Coultar (in

Slabbert:et al 1998: 23-3) as "the process of monitoring activities to ensure

that they are being accomplished as planned and of correction for any

significant deviations" without exercising this kind of control as part of the

management of employment relations. , It is not possible to know whether

the organization's employment relations systems actually performs as

intended — it will be impossible to ensure that it operates in a way that it

actually enhances competitiveness. Controlling the quality of the

employment relations system helps to ensure that all employment relations

management strategies and practices are adding value to the organization.

The employment relations management audit can be described as a survey

of a company's human resources and industrial relations policies,

procedures, processes and practices. It entails an analysis of these

procedures, processes, policies and practices with an evaluation of their

quality and present functioning followed by suggestions for improvement.

Reverting back to privatisation movement: Douglas C Mc Donald (1990:

177) alluded that privatisation efforts have been motivated by the belief that

public correctional institutions are too crowded, but the overcrowding

problem is less acute than is commonly supposed. Privatisation ventures

are driven by the perception that public corrections managers have failed,

but the public record is by no means consistently bleak and in some

respects it is quite outstanding. The problem of overcrowding, rising costs

and failed management is most real in the areas of higher custody prisons

and jails. Corruption is prevalent, but at present the questions remains

whether privatisation will offer help to the Department of Correctional

Services.

10

In the face of ever increasing prison population, Department of Correctional

Services (DCS) has signed contracts of two prisons to be constructed,

financed and managed by a Consortium of Private Companies. The

objective of this contract was to mainly help alleviate overcrowding.

Deen Letchmiah (1998: 1) cited a case study where he showed that until a

decade or two ago the planning and construction of Public Works were

generally regarded as one of Government principal responsibilities.

However, in the present times this view has changed significantly. There

are many good and practical reasons for this change. Primarily

Government is either unable or unwilling to raise the funds needed to

finance large scale, capital intensive projects; furthermore, they may be ill

equipped to oversee the construction and subsequent management of such

projects.

Conversely, private companies and investors are willing to take on the risks

if there are sufficient financial rewards. As a result we see the number and

scale of privately financed projects rising sharply particularly in countries

whose fast growing economies have outstripped the infrastructure required

to support this growth.

According to [email protected] , prison privatisation has received

mixed feelings in various countries. Australia experienced problems with

regard to private prisons. This led the Government of Queensland to put an

end to the prison privatisation process.

According to ppwatchhotmail.com , Mr. Bill MC Grath, Minister for

Corrections, heralded a new era in correctional facilities and said that it

would set new standards, offering a good balance between human modern

living standards and firm correctional policy. This speech was delivered on

18 August at the opening ceremony for port Phillip; Victoria third Private

Prison.

2.2 Historical Background

11

It is well known fact that one of Department's greatest challenges is that of

eliminating overcrowding in prison. However, the need for infrastructure far

exceeds the available resources and it has become clear that the traditional

resources simply cannot address the ever increasing demand for prisoner

accommodation. The traditional method of procurement is not only lengthy,

but it also not considered the most effective.

Assets Procurement and Operating Partnership System (APOPS) is an

innovative procurement technique aimed at alleviating the inadequacies of

the traditional procurement system. It involves a contract between

GOvernment and Private Party, which is awarded the rights to design, build,

finance, operate and maintain a prison facility for the lifetime of the contract.

Instead of paying for assets, Government then pays the contractor an

agreed upon fees for services that he/she provides, i.e. inter alia security,

health care, maintenance, rehabilitation programme etc.

The main rationale behind the APOPS initiative is to provide more prison

accommodation, more quickly and cost effectively that would be the case

with traditional procurement.

2.3 Public Private Partnership (PPP)

In 1997, laws were promulgated which gave the Department of Correctional

Services powers to engage in public private partnership to build prisons.

During the same year, the Department requested tenders for building

private prisons.

The Department of Correctional Services has turned to the private sector for

assistance and has signed contract for two prisons to be designed,

constructed, financed and managed by a consortium of private companies.

The Kutama Sinthumule Prison in Louis Trichard opened in March 2002

and Mangaung Prison in Bloemfontein in July 2001. These were the first

12

two private prisons in South Africa. Depending on their success more may

follow. The Group 4 Flack Wackenhut merger created arguably the biggest

prison management company in the world. The Multi National Security

Consortium Group Company in the United States of America won a

lucrative contract from the South African Government to build and manage

two 3000 bed Maximum Security Prisons in Louis Trichard and

Bloemfontein(Trade Union Research Project, 30/6/2000).

As illustrated above, international private prisons have been received with

mixed feelings, although many of the criticisms could be equally applied to

state operated facilities because of problems with comparability. It is

extremely difficult to determine whether private prisons provide cost

savings. In South Africa it is impossible to ascertain whether a private

prison will be cheaper that the public prison, because the standard of care

offered by private prisons is entirely unmatched in the public sector.

The main objective of the study is not to investigate whether private prisons

provide cost savings but to audit the employment relations management as

applied in the private prisons. .

2.4 The Impact of Employment Law on Employment Relationships

Political and industrial democracy in South Africa evolved historically along

racial lines, leading to the unique, but unfair, employment relations system,

which came to an end during April 1994 elections.

According to Swanepoel et.al (in Nel et al 2000 94) the employment

relationship is also influenced by various sources of law, which include

common law, the contract of employment, collective agreements,

negotiated by trade unions and management, guidelines of the International

Labour Organization in the form of conventions, and the South African

Constitution Act no 108 of 1996. It is essential to understand the

interdependence between human resources management and employment

relations, as presented in this dissertation, and should be studied as a unit.

13

2.4.1 Government Policy and the Constitution

The Constitution is the supreme law of the country (Act no 108 of 1996).

Thus the provisions of all South African Statutes must conform to the basic

principles contained in the constitution. The constitution provides very clear

guidelines with regard to employment relations. Section 23 of the

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996)

stipulates the following provisions:

Every one has the right to fair labour practices.

Every worker has the right to form and join a trade union, to participate

in the activities of a trade union, and to strike.

Every employer has the right to form and join an employer's organisation

and to participate in the activities of an employer's organisation.

Every trade union and employer's organisation has the right to

determine its own activities, to organize, to bargain collectively, and to

form and join a federation.

Every trade union, employer's organisation, and employer has the right

to engage in collective bargaining.

National legislation may be enacted to regulate collective bargaining, to the

extent that the legislation may limit a right, the right must comply with

section 36 (1) of the Constitution Act 108 of 1996.

It is clear that the constitution and government policy set the scene for the

practice for employment relations in South Africa which emphasis that

employment Law should also facilitate worker participation and decision

making in the workplace.

Roodt (in Nel et.al 2000:95) comments on how the government ought to go

about transforming South African Society within the African Renaissance

and the focus on Africaness.

Fundamental Socio delivery and transformation must be enhanced.

14

A new understanding must be spread of what it means to live in a

democracy in order to counter the myopic view that democracy

engenders rights to citizens while responsibilities and duties reside with

the Government alone.

The focus must be on effectiveness, efficiency and delivery in respect of

Government initiatives and actions. This includes the civil services,

which are linked to the need for economic growth as the engine for job

creation.

In other words, the fundamental base on which meaningful and suitable

jobs are created is by ensuring the economy grows in a way that creates

jobs. This means that the number of people in the public Services must

be reduced.

A tougher approach to dealing with law and order, including partnership

between state, communities, and business in preventing and combating

crime and corruption is essential.

Initiatives to stimulate job creation, in alliance with business and labour,

must be accelerated.

A world outlook is important for South Africa, on its position in the

region, in Africa and in the rest of the world and, in particular, in relation

to bringing about an African renaissance (Nel et.al 2000:95).

However Government policy and sentiment were reflected in President

Mbeki's opening speech to Parliament in February 2002. He stated that

Government had to take strong action against irresponsible trade union

behaviour such as strikes, since it could impact negatively on economy and

job creation.

Readers must take careful note that the discussion of employment law in

the following section is in summarized form.

2.4.2 Employment Equity Act, 1998(Act 55 Of 1998)

15

This Act became the centrepiece of legislation doing away with all forms of

discrimination in employment in South Africa. The Employment Equity Act,

1998 (Act 55 of 1998) was promulgated to:

Promote the constitutional rights of equality and the exercise of true

democracy,

Eliminate unfair discrimination in employment,

Ensure the implementation of Employment Equity Act to redress the

effects of discrimination.

Achieve a diverse workforce broadly representative of our people.

Promote economic development and efficiency in the workforce, and

_Give effect to the obligations of the republic as a member of the

International Labour Organisation.

The aim of Section 2 of the Employment Act, 1998 is to achieve equity in

the workplace by:

Promoting equal opportunity and fair treatment in employment through

the elimination of unfair discrimination, and

Implementing affirmative action measures to redress the disadvantages

in employment experienced by designated groups, in order to ensure

their equitable representation in all occupational categories and levels

in the workforce.

The Act excludes members of the South African National Defence Force

(SANDF) the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and the South African

Secret Services (SASS). The anti discriminatory provisions of the Act apply

to all other employers and employees, but the affirmative action provisions

only apply to "designated employers and members of designated groups".

This has a direct bearing on the anti-discrimination prohibitions outlined in

Chapter 2 and the affirmative action provisions in Chapter 3 of the Act. The

drawing up of employment equity plans and the achievement of numerical

goals are also important aspects of the Act.

2.4.3 The Impact of the Act on Human Resources

16

The Act impacts greatly on all sectors of the South African economy

regarding employment policies and practices. The impact includes, but is

not limited to, recruitment procedures, advertising, and selection criteria,

appointments process, job classification and grading, remuneration,

employment benefits and terms and conditions of employment, job

assignments, the working environment and facilities, training and

development, performance evaluation, systems, promotions, transfers,

demotion, disciplinary measures other than dismissal.

The Act was instrumental in breaking down the employment discrimination

the country experienced previously. This explains how diversity and

transformation should be managed in the workplace.

2.4.4 Basic Conditions Of Employment Act, 1997(Act No 75 011997.

Due to the importance of this Act, more attention is paid to it than other acts

in this dissertation, except for the Labour Relations Act of 1995. The Act

came into operation, replacing the Wage Act of 1957, on 1 December 1998.

In respect of the Private Sector and this became applicable to the Public

Sector on 1 May 2000.

The Act has two primary objectives:

To ensure that working conditions of unorganized and vulnerable

workers meet minimum standard that are socially acceptable in relation

to the level of development of the country, and

To remove rigidities and inefficiencies from the regulation of minimum

conditions of employment and to promote flexibility.

The Act provides for basic conditions of employment which forms part of

employment contract in South Africa, unless they have been replaced,

varied or excluded in accordance with the Act, or unless the employees has

17

personally, or via a bargaining council agreement, contracted for more

favourable terms of employment.

The working hours of employees must be arranged so as not to endanger

their health and safety and with due regard to their family responsibilities.

The requirements with regard to remuneration, deductions and termination

do not apply to employees who work for fewer hours per week.

Chapter 2 and 3 of the Act provides that the maximum ordinary weekly

hours for all employees are forty-five. The maximum daily hours that an

employee may work is nine for those who work on five days or less a week,

and eight for employees who work six days a week.

According to schedule 1 of the Act, there must be a progressive reduction of

the maximum hours of work. It proposes a procedure to reduce working

hours of employees to forty hours and eight hours working day.

Overtime may only be worked by agreement. An employee may not work

more than ten hours overtime in a week.

An employee must have a meal interval of at least sixty minutes after five

hours. This may be reduced to thirty minutes by agreement. An employee

required to be available for work or remain on the employers' premises

during the meal interval must be paid.

The Act contains protection for employees who work at night. Night work is

defined as work performed between 18h00 and 06h00. Employees must be

compensated by the payment of an allowance or by a reduction of working

hours. Transportation must be made available for employees. Employers

must inform employees who regularly work after 23h00 of the health and

safety hazards of night work. Upon request, employers must provide

employees with a free medical assessment.

18

All employees must be paid their normal wage for a Public Holiday that falls

on a working day. An employee may not be required to work on a Public

Holiday unless by agreement. Work on a Public Holiday must be

remunerated at double rates.

The limits on ordinary and overtime working hours, and the requirement, for

meal intervals, and rest period do not prevent the performance of

emergency work.

Employees are entitled to three weeks fully paid leave after twelve months

continuous employment. An employee is entitled to six weeks paid sick

leave for every thirty-six months of continuous employment. Should an

employee be sick for more than two days a medical certificate should be

produced as proof.

A pregnant employee is entitled to four months maternity leave. This leave

may begin up to four weeks before the expected date of birth, unless

otherwise agreed or if required by the employee for health reasons.

An employee is entitled to three days paid family responsibility leave.

These apply to employees who work four or more days a week. The

employee may take this leave in the event of the birth or illness of the

employees' child, if the employees' immediate family dies. An employer

may require reasonable proof of the purpose for which this leave is taken

before paying the employee.

2.4.5 Labour Relations Act, 1995(Act 66 of 1995)

The purpose of the Act is to advance economic development, socio-justice,

labour peace and a democratisation of the workplace by fulfilling the

primary objectives of the Act, which are to realize and regulate the

19

fundamental rights of workers and employers under Sec 23 of the

Constitution.

The Act applies to all employment relationship between employers and

employees and makes no distinction as to whether these relationships are

in Private or Public Sector.

The status of the Act is such that in the case of any conflict between the

provisions of the Labour Relations Act and any other Act (except the

Constitution) priority will be given to the provisions of the Labour Relations

Act. The Labour Relations Act (referred as LRA) automatically supersedes

the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (referred to as BCEA).

.2.4.5.1 Freedom of Association and General Protection

One of the objectives of the Act is to give effect to the provisions of the

Constitution. One of the provisions contained in Sec 23 of the Constitution

stipulates that workers have the right to form and join trade unions, and

employers have the rights to form employers' organizations. This freedom

of association is also enshrined in the International Labour Standards of the

International Labour Organization.

Union members, further, have the right to elect office bearers, officials, or

trade union representatives. The functions of a trade union representative

must be carried out subject to the unions' constitution.

No person in terms of Sec 7 of the Act may discriminate against an

employer by forcing an employer not to be or become a member of an

employers' organisation, or to give up membership of an employers'

organisation, or to take part in such organisational activities.

Employers are granted essentially the same rights as employees in respect

of freedom of association and freedom from victimization. Trade unions

and employers' organisation likewise have the right to establish

20

independently constituted bodies, to organise their own administration and

activities, to take part in the establishment of federations and to affiliate to

other bodies, both locally and internationally.

Every trade union and employer's organisation has the right to determine its

own constitution and rules and to elect office bearers, officials and

representatives, subject to the provisions of Chapter 6 of the Act.

2.4.5.2 Collective Bargaining.

The Act promotes collective bargaining in terms of dispute resolution

mechanisms. It should however be mentioned that there is no direct duty to

bargain in terms of Labour Relations Act.

2.4.5.3 Organisational Rights.

Unions are accorded "sufficiently representative rights: such as the rights to

access, to hold meetings with employees outside working hours (Section

12) to conduct an election at the workplace and to be granted stop order

facilities (Section 13). A majority union or more than one union which

together represents a majority of employees at the workplace may also

appoint shop stewards, may be given information necessary for the purpose

of representation with the employer, may establish thresholds for

representation.

More attention is focused on access to the workplace, leave for trade union

activities and disclosure of information, since they have far reaching

implications for human resource managers.

2.4.5.3.1 Trade Union Access to Workplace.

21

According to Le Roux (in Nel et .a1.2000: 106) there is no definition of

sufficient representative and if there is dispute in this regard it should be

resolved through arbitration undertaken by the commission. Any office

bearer is entitled to enter the employer's premises to recruit, to

communicate with its members, or just to serve its interest. Majority trade

unions are entitled to hold meetings outside working hours at the

employer's premises.

2.4.5.3.2 Leave For Trade Union Activities.

In terms of Section 15 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 an employee who

is an office bearer of a representative trade union, or a federation of trade

unions to which the representative trade union is affiliated, is entitled to take

reasonable leave during working hours to perform the functions of that

office and to be trained in any subject relevant to the performance of these

functions.

2.4.5.3.3 Disclosure of Information

An employer must give all relevant information to representatives of majority

unions necessary for their effective functioning. The employer should

disclose relevant information, which is necessary for collective bargaining.

The employer should identify information, which is confidential.

2.4.5.4 Strikes and Lockouts.

In terms of the Act, every employee has a fundamental right to strike. This

right is subject to limitations, which are mentioned below:

• Section 213 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, a strike is defined

as: the partial or complete considered refusal to work or the retaliation

22

or obstruction of work by persons who are or have been employed by

the same employer or by different employers, for the purpose of

remedying a grievance or resolving a dispute in respect of any matter of

mutual interest between employers and employees.

Section 213 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 a protest action is

defined as a partial or complete concerted refusal to work, or the

retaliation or obstruction of work, for the purpose of promoting or

defending the socio-economic interests of workers, but not for a

purpose referred to in the definition of strike.

Lock-out means the exclusion by an employer of employees from the

workplace, for the purpose of compelling the employees to accept a

demand in respect of any matter of mutual interest between employer

and employees, whether or not the employer breaches those

employees' contracts of employment in the course of or for the purpose

of that exclusion.

According to Sec 64 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 various

procedures must be followed for an employee to embark on a protected

strike action or for an employer to lockout his/ her employees. The

dispute should either be referred to bargaining or statutory council (if

there's one) or to the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and

Arbitration and a certificate issued stating that the dispute remains

unresolved. Parties have 30 days to attempt to resolve the dispute. If

the dispute concerns a refusal to bargain (which includes a refusal to

recognize a trade union) as a collective bargaining agent, then as

advisory award by the Commission is required in addition to other

requirements. At least forty-eight hours written notice of either strike or

lockout must be given to the other party or parties.

2.4.5.5 Essential and Maintenance Services

23

The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 also outlaws strikes in essential

services or maintenance services in terms of section 71-75.

Employers and employees engaged in essential services are prohibited

from embarking on Industrial action or Socio-economic protest action.

Essential services are defined as those services whose interruption would

endanger the life, personal safety, or health of the whole and part of the

Population.

2.4.5.6 Dispute Resolution

In chapter 7 of the Act, some of the most dramatic changes from the old

dispensation are legislated. The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation

and Arbitration (referred to as "The Commission"), is introduced into the Act.

The functions of Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration are

to:

Attempt to resolve, through conciliation any dispute referred to it in

terms of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995.

Arbitrate the dispute if the act requires arbitration or if it remains

unresolved after conciliation, or any party has requested that the

dispute be resolved through arbitration

Assist in the establishment of workplace forums.

The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration must attempt to

resolve disputes through conciliation and arbitration.

2.5 Skills Development Act, 1998 (Act 97 Of 1998)

24

Training is of critical importance in South Africa and a major overhaul has

taken place in recent years. According to sec 2 the objectives of the Skills

Development Act are to:

Develop the skills of the South African workforce.

Increase the levels of investment in education and training in the labour

market and to improve the return on investment.

Use the workplace as an active learning environment, to provide

employees with the opportunities to acquire new skills, and to provide

opportunities for new entrants to the labour market to gain work

experience.

Employ persons who find it difficult to be employed.

Encourage workers to participate in leadership and other training

programmes.

Improve the employment prospects of persons previously

disadvantaged by unfair discrimination and redress those

disadvantages through training and education.

Ensure the quality for education and training in and for the workplace.

Assist work seekers to find work, retrenched workers to re-enter the

labour market, and employers to find qualified employees,

According to Swanepoel (in Nel et.al (2000 124) various managerial

challenges and implications of the new training legislation should be

taken into consideration. The aim of new training legislation is to:

Ensure that all stakeholders in the organisation are aware of the

different acts and the employers' responsibilities.

Participate in the bodies as set out by the South African Qualifications

Authority (for example, standards generating bodies and Education

Training Quality Assurers).

Make finances and personnel available to involve themselves in the

NQF alignment process and for paying levies.

2.6 Conclusion

25

It is essential to understand that a complete break with the apartheid past,

to which South African's labour force was subjected, has been made and

that an approach of participation by labour in the affairs of organisations has

been enacted in various employment laws. Current employment laws in

South Africa are structured according to the spirit and prescription of the

Constitution. Once we understand the context of employment law, which

forms the basis of effective human resource management, which is fair, an

equitable, it is appropriate to survey companies' human resource and

industrial relations policies, procedures, processes and practices. Before

we can venture into a chapter on audit of employment relations

management, it would be important to discuss first an overview of the prison

system, as it had developed in the modern era and the current state of

South African prisons.

26

CHAPTER 3

PRISON SYSTEMS IN THE MODERN ERA AND CURRENT STATE OF SOUTH

AFICAN PRISONS.

3.1 Introduction

The Government has the exclusive right to mete out punishment to

perpetrators. During ancient time, commission of crime was considered to

be in violation of social norms, which was dealt with immediately by the

community and which usually took form of restitution and compensation.

These traditional justice systems were therefore concerned with the victim

rather than restoring the order or harmony, which existed prior to the

commission of a crime (Goyer, 2001:9).

On 31 April 2003 the Department of Correctional Services is presently

managing 241 prisons countrywide. As on 30 April 2003 the Department of

Correctional Services had cell accommodation of 111241 as opposed to a

total prison population of 190180 prisoners. As at 30 April 2003 the number

of personnel in the employ of the Department of Correctional Services stood

at 33285.

The forerunner of the prison was the workhouse, an Institution that

developed in line with the labour trends of the industrial revolution.

The concept of imprisonment was originated in England, prisons were

intended to accomplish much more than simply house criminals and

administer their basic needs while serving their imposed sentences. Rather

than simply warehouse criminals for a specific time, the duty of the prison

system was to transform the individuals in its care into respectable, law

abiding citizens. The workhouse concept was evident in the corrections

strategy employed in these first prisons where criminals were instilled with

the virtues of good citizenship through solitary confinement and hard labour.

It was expected that the shiftless lazy vagrant, once broken by extended

27

isolation, desired result was a healthy appreciation for the rewards of hard

work and a permanent memory of the torment of solitary confinement,

which would deter future criminal behaviour (Goyer, 2001:9).

Dutch colonists introduced prisons in South Africa. After the occupation of

the British, the penal policy began to take shape historically in South Africa.

As in England, the duty of the prison administration was to reform criminals

in order to accommodate the economic needs of that time. After slavery

was abolished in 1834, policy began to be shaped by the country's labour

demands. During the 1840's and 50's many public projects were

constructed using prison labour. Inmates at the Breakwater Prison, now a

historical landmark, were used to construct the Breakwater, which protects

the Cape Town Waterfront (Goyer, 2001: 10).

During the late 1800's, labour demands of the mining industry began to

impact on Policies for imprisonment. The development of the South African

prison system thus began to parallel that of another typically South African

institution, the mining compound.

The mining company paid the expenses to incarcerate their labourers arid

also paid the State for the use of their Prison Labour. By the end of 19 th

century, the De Beers Diamond Mining Company had used over 10 000

prison labourers daily. The first racially segregated prison was constructed

in Kimberly and eventually both prisons and mining compounds were

segregated along tribal lines.

Many prisoners were sent to work in the mines. They were incarcerated for

violating pass laws, which had been in effect in one form or another for

nearly 100 years before the Nationalist Government came to power in 1948.

Thus, incarceration of Africans for minor infractions such as pass offences

could reliably supply the necessary labour for the growing economy

throughout the 1900's. In this way, the State effectively became the

provider of unskilled black labour for the Mines through the penal system.

28

In the later 1950's Prisoners were used for farming and dozens of special

farm prisons were constructed for this purpose. In 1959 an Act of

Parliament officially abolished prison labour, but replaced the practice with

policies that prescribed "useful and healthy outdoor work" for short term

prisoners (Goyer, 2001: 10).

3.2 Current State of South African Prisons

Prison conditions in South Africa have been directly affected by the political

changes in the country since the beginning of 1990. In 1990, apartheid in

the prison system was formally abolished, with the repeal of the section

requiring black and white prisoners to be housed separately. The Prison

Services was separated from the Department of Justice and renamed the

Department of Correctional Services. The Prison Act was renamed the

Correctional Services Act in 1991. A new sentence of "Correctional

Supervision" was also introduced allowing the possibility of a reduction in

the prison population and acknowledging the limited usefulness of custodial

sentences (Africa Watch and Prison Projects, 1994).

South Africa has a young democracy comparable with countries in Eastern

Europe and the former Soviet Union.. After the fall of the Berlin Wall,

imprisonment in the transformation of Political States exhibited two phases.

The prison population decreased as political prisoners from the old regime

was released and new Government structures were put in place. The next

phase saw the difficulties of a new economy; new institutions and an

entirely new Government resulted in increased criminal activity.

Government is committed to fighting crime and improving safety and

security over the medium term. The Department of Correctional Services is

the key player in this endeavor; together with the South African Police

(SAPS) they manage the output of the system. DCS is responsible for safe

custody and humane detention of prisoners, thereby promoting their

rehabilitation.

29

In the management of its human resources the Department pursues the

following objectives:

The establishment of an adequate, representative and equitable

workforce.

The empowerment of personnel through development and training.

The maintenance of sound labour relations.

The promotion of job satisfaction and the creation of a harmonious

working environment.

The maintenance of a fair, yet effective disciplinary system.

In accordance with the requirements of the Employment Equity Act, 1998

(Act 55 of 1998) as well as the White Paper on Affirmative Action in the

Public Services, the Department has embodied its commitment to

affirmative action by developing Policies on Equity, Disability and Gender.

These policies cover aspects such as recruitment and selection, selection

interviews, performance management and human resource development.

The Department of Correctional Services is committed to accommodating

persons with disabilities. On 31 March 2002 the Department had 129

persons with disabilities in its employ, that represents 0, 4% of the total

personnel component.

The Department established the Employee Assistance Programme (EAP)

two years ago as to render support service to staff members who are

working under extremely challenging and abnormal work environment.

Vacant positions within the Department are advertised either internally or

externally, depending on the level and nature of the post, to ensure that

quality appointments are made.

During January 2003, 1280 personnel members terminated their services in

the Department compared to the 1694 during the previous financial year.

Certain categories of personnel reflect higher turnover than others e.g.

30

psychologist, auditors, information technology personnel, nurses and social

workers. These persons posses professional skills that are sought after in

the open labour market and they are often lured away by more attractive

salary structures and more pleasant working conditions, leaving the

Department with little leverage to retain their services (Annual Report of the

Department of Correctional Services for the period 1 January 2001to 31

March 2002).

3.3 The Department of Correctional Services and Criminal Justice

The Department of Correctional Services is one of the components of the

Criminal Justice System. As an active partner in the criminal justice

system, DCS plays pivotal in the prevention of crime through rehabilitation

and reintegration of prisoners. However, DCS cannot achieve this goal

alone. Thus, the Department has identified restorative justice as one of its

key strategic objectives. Pursuant to this objective a discussion document

on restorative justice was compiled which is aimed at creating a common

understanding of the concept with offenders, personnel and with the

community (Goyer, 2001:23).

Various events were organized to promote the concept of restorative justice

to create awareness amongst personnel, offenders, victims, families and

the community.

During March 2002, a team of experts in the field of restorative justice from

the Correctional Services in Canada and the Queens University in Kingston

assisted with the training of 41 Officials of the Department of Correctional

Services.

Politicians exploited the public's fear of crime in order to gain votes. The

building of prisons cannot reduce crime. Researchers in the field of

criminology and penology have consistently found that prisons did not deter

crime. Muntingh of the National Institute for Crime Prevention and the

Reintegration of offenders (in Goyer, 2001: 23) observe: "throughout the

31

world people are imprisoned in vast numbers without it having resulted in

any significant reduction in crime. The fact of punishment also does not

appear to have any significant impact in preventing people to commit crime.

The fact that so many current prisoners are in fact recidivists and have been

in prison before clearly shows the deterrence approach does not hold much

promise as a crime reduction strategy (Goyer, 2001: 23).

Give that the Department of Correctional Services has no role in the arrest,

conviction of sentencing components of the Criminal Justice System it

becomes it clear that the DCS cannot operate in isolation as a tool for the

reduction of crime. The only role that prisons can play in reducing Crime is

through rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders upon their release.

3.4 Conclusion

From the fore-going discussion, it is abundantly clear that the government

has the exclusive right to mete out punishment to offenders. It can also be

concluded that the Government is committed to fighting and improving

safety and security of its people.

32

CHAPTER 4

PRISON PRIVATIZATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

4.1 Introduction

In this chapter, an exposition of prison privatisation will be given. Important

phenomena in this connection are privatisation, types of privatisation,

private partnerships and pros and cons of prison privatisation (Goyer, 2001:

25).

Goyer (2001:25) stated that South African prisons are over-crowded, under

staffed, ill designed and structurally deteriorating. The Department of

Correctional Services cannot contribute towards the rehabilitation of

criminals without the necessary facilities and resources. Due to budgetary

constraints, the government cannot pledge additional funds to the

Department of Correctional Services to fulfil its legal mandate. In addition,

the voting public is usually not in favour of spending more money on prisons

rather on education and training and health care merit immediate attention.

In the light of increasing prison population and the lack of funds available,

Governments around the world are turning to private sector involvement in

providing correctional facilities.

4.2 Privatisation

Privatisation in its simplest form refers to the once off sale of public assets

to the private sector (Goyer, 2001: 25)

Privatisation is defined as any restructuring that involves the sale or

outsourcing of State assets or functions to the Private Sector, the

replacement of Social objectives with profitability by State owned agencies

and the opening of historically State controlled sectors to Private

competition(Congress of South African Trade Unions (Volume 11.3 The

33

Shop steward 2002). For example, historically, safety and security was

almost entirely in the hands of the State, but recently private security

companies have taken over important security functions in higher income

areas, including closing off streets. In addition, some prisons have been

privatised).

The impact of prison privatisation cannot be assessed at this stage.

However, many countries, found that privatised systems are pruned to

corruption, oppressive practices and poor security. The problem is that the

prisoners, staff and surrounding communities have little control over the

service providers. The State pays for the services rendered. The

government does not have a tool to measure quality control.

4.3 Types of Prison Privatisation

The concept privatisation may imply different things to different people.

Prison privatisation is used to refer to varying types and degrees of private

sector involvement. In any type of prison privatisation, the general format is

that the State pays for the costs of incarceration and the private sector

provides various services. The most limited form of privatisation is

contracting where a private entity is hired to perform specific services. The

prison system can use contracts with the private sector to provide ancillary

services such as catering, health care, laundry and janitorial services

(Goyer, 2001: 26).

The next level of privatisation is contracting private entities to provide

management services, such as staffing, administration and security.

Operational privatisation refers to a private company being contracted to

run an entire prison, including both care and non-care functions. The

Government still makes the policy for prison, and is expected to monitor the

performance of the contractor, but the day-to-day business of running the

prison is left to the private company (Goyer, 2001: 27)

34

Private companies can also be hired to design and build a prison. Building

a prison is a huge undertaking, and the Government will normally contract

out a great portion of the construction to private companies. Alternatively,

the Government can simply hire a prison construction company, which will

design the prison, manage the sub contractors, and completely oversee the

entire project. The advantages of these types of privatisation are that

private contractors have much less red tape and bureaucracy to deal with,

when hiring sub contractors, making procurement simpler, faster, easier

and cheaper. The state only negotiates with the primary contractor and the

rest of the responsibility and co-ordination is left to the private companies.

The provision of law and order is a basic service provided by Government,

and cannot be entirely relinquished to the private sector. Prison privatisation

does not involve turning the entire prison service over to private companies

and selling all of the assets and facilities (Goyer, 2001: 27).

4.4 Private Partnerships

• According to the Annual Report of the Department of Correctional

Services for the period 1 January 2001 to 31 March 2002, it has entered

into the Public Private Partnerships. ). Apops is aimed at providing

prison space (beds) by means of joint venture prisons. The above-

mentioned two contracts jointly provide an additional number of 5952

prison spaces.

All aspects of the relationship are governed by a concession contract

(together with schedules) entered into between the Government, through

the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) and the Private Sector. A

Correctional Services Controller monitors contract compliance on a daily

basis. This official is based at the site of the privately operated prison that

provides DCS Head Office with reports on the operation of the prison with

specific reference to contract compliance. The Department's Apops

Directorate acts as a regulatory body that manages these contracts with the

assistance of the Controller.

35

The Apops' initiative is to provide prison accommodation and services more

cost effectively and more quickly. It assists to combat overcrowding in

Prisons and improve conditions for rehabilitation. Apops set out to improve

efficiency in service delivery, transfer risk to the Private Sector and transfer

relevant skills from the Private Sector to the Department. The Department

through these partnerships envisaged to accomplished effectiveness.

A daily contract fee per available prisoner place was paid over to the Private

Companies to operate the two prisons on a monthly basis. Totals

expenditure for payment to the private companies for the 2001-02 financial

year amounted to R104 549 449 (Annual Report of the Department of

Correctional Services for the period 1 January 2001 to 31 March 2002).

4.5 Pros and Cons of Privatization of Prisons.

Charles Logan (in Goyer, 2001: 28-38) discusses Private Prisons: "Pros

and Cons" as follows:

4.5.1 Propriety

The argument about the propriety is justified through the involvement of the

private sector in provision of correctional services. The philosophical

objection is that only the State has the legitimate authority to punish

citizens. The rule of law is the source of Government legitimacy, and

authority, without which the State itself cease to exist. The counter

argument is that the State is not the sole provider of such services.

The then Governor of New York, Mario Cuomo (in Goyer, 2001: 28)

explained, "it is not Governments obligation to provide services but to see

that they are provided". Logan points out, "it is one thing to believe that only

the State has the right to imprison someone. It is another matter entirely to

believe that only the State can run a Prison in fair, humane, effective and

economical fashion.

36

The first belief as a matter of political philosophy.

The second is an empirical proposition.

If the government decides to provide service and this is a policy decision.

The actual production of that service is the implementation of that decision

and is simply an administrative action.

One of the criticisms of private prisons is that companies will have a profit

motive to fuel a fear of crime and will encourage reliance on prisons as a

viable solution. This could then affect policymaking and criminal justice

legislation in such a way that the profits of the prison company are served

rather than the safety and security of the general public. The danger arises

when prisons manage only to produce more criminals and the result is

actually an increase in crime.

If unchecked, the phenomenon could spiral, as voters believe more prisons

will reduce crime and the opposite effect continues. In this scenario, the

only winner is the prison company that is provided with a constantly

expanding market (Goyer, 2001: 29).

4.5.2 Cost

The proponents of prison privatisation maintain that the private sector can

provide the same services as the Public Sector at a lower cost.

Privatisation in other sectors has not necessarily led to cost savings and it

remains debatable that it can actually raise costs in the long run. The

charge is that contractors, anxious to break into the market, will submit

extremely low estimates. Once a dependant relationship is established, the

contractor will raise prices in order to make up for the initial loss.

Cost comparison between public and private facilities is extremely difficult,

and not one that has been completed to date has been accepted as being

accurate. This is because prisons vary in terms of size, location, and

37

classification of prisoners and these factors all impact on cost (Goyer, 2001:

30).

4.5.3 Quality

The quality of prison services is extremely difficult to quantify, and

impossible to compare between privately and publicly managed facilities.

Proponents of private prison believe that contractors will bring better

technology and innovation to the provision of Correctional Services.

Joan Mullen of Abt Associates in the United States comments that "one of

the major strengths claimed for private prisons is that their greater

management flexibility and more rapid speed of response will promote both

minor innovations and major programme changes, whether through

initiation, expansion, contraction or termination"(Goyer, 2001: 31).

Opponents claim that private prisons will be of lesser quality because

companies are motivated solely by profit will be forced to cut corners and

maximize returns by minimizing Investment. The greater portion of any

prison services budget is personnel costs, so it follows that this would also

be the area for the most significant cost cutting. Critics argue that private

prison employees are paid less poorly trained and overworked leading to

substandard and even unsafe correctional facilities. This argument is

difficult to support, because of the difficulty in comparing wages and training

programmes for different prisons with different populations in different areas

(Goyer, 2001: 31).

4.5.4 Security

In order to ensure the safety of the prisoners, the personnel and the greater

community should give a top priority to security. One concern regarding the

security of private prisons is that cost cutting will lead to understaffing and

poor training. This lack of appropriate supervision will then result in

38

prisoners harming each other, attempting to escape, or a general loss of

management control. There is also a concern that strikes, or insolvency

could result in a disruption of operations. public sector employees in many

prison systems are forbidden by law from going on strikes due to the nature

of their work, and Governments are somewhat insulated from bankruptcy.

Traditionally, only the Government is permitted to use force against its

citizens, and transferring this license to a private company is not something,

which should be considered lightly. The use of force by private prison,

which operates for profit, as opposed to a state department, which

ostensibly draws from the will of the people, is a significant point of

discussion in the debate over Private Prisons (Gayer, 2001: 36).

4.5.5 Corruption

Closely related to challenges of accountability is the relative propensity for

corruption to be found in public versus private institutions. The involvement

of additional financial transactions can expose the Government to additional

risk of fraud. The awarding of Government contracts in general carries with

it the risk of kickbacks and political favours. For example, a debacle in the

South African Arms deal, which led to prosecution of African National

Congress Chief Whip Tony Yengeni?

On the other hand, the private prison companies have vested financial

interest in covering up misconduct and would therefore be more prone to

bribery and other dishonest practices. However, supporters of private

prisons, argue that corruption is not prevalent in private prisons. Private

companies are aware that they may lose their contract for non-performance

and corrupt practices.

In any institution, public or private, the likelihood for corruption has more to

do with the management environment and the controls in place to prevent

such activity than it do with the public or private nature of the enterprise.

The greatest control risk is in the actual process of awarding the contract

39

and the financial agreements contained therein. This is the case whenever

the Government contracts with private company and is yet another reason

why the procurement process should be as transparent as possible, and the

contracts themselves should be made available to the public (Gayer, 2001:

36).

4.6 Arguments for Prison Privatisation

Logan (1990: 41: 48) summarises his arguments for prison privatisation as

follows:

As a result of contracting out prison services, the true costs become

highly visible, and can be analysed, compared, and minimised. This

provides competitive price and product information.

Contracting allows prisons to be financed, sited, and constructed more

quickly and cheaply than government prisons, whereas the Government

takes two to five years, a private company can do it in six months to one

year. Also, the private company is more apt to design for efficient

operation.

Private contractors have greater speed and freedom in matters from

personnel to purchasing. This flexibility promotes innovation and

experimentation, because it allows for risk-taking. It becomes easier to

undo mistakes, and creates an environment, which is ideal for change.

Involving the private sector adds expertise, skills and experience of a

multinational company's "Head Office", which will exceed that of smaller

jurisdictions.

Contracting out reduces a tendency towards bureaucratic self-

perpetuation and helps limit the size of Government. It's easier to

control business interests in encouraging greater spending than

Governments insatiable craving for internal expansion.

40

Private prison contracts increase accountability because market

mechanisms of control are added to the political process.

Private prisons are highly visible, while the public ignores state prisons.

Greater public suspicion towards "Big Business" translates into

increased vigilance over those who run prisons.

Private prison contacts promote the development and use of objective

performance measures. The Government spends taxpayers money

without incentive to measure quality of performance, but contracts

usually specify performance indicators and to the same extent broader

goals as well.

By creating an alternative, private prison contracts encourage

competitive evaluation, thus raising standards for Government as well

as for Private Contractors

Private prison contracts provide a surgical solution. If reform is needed,

public, management is entrenched and inert, whereas a contractor is

easier to replace than a Government agency.

Private sector involvement in the prison industry may lead to increasing

use of the imprisonment, but excluding the private sector, is not likely to

reverse this trend. Vested interests can be found in any kind of

organisation, public or private. The public interest is not necessarily allied

with the interests of Government agencies, just as it is not necessarily

served by profit seeking corporations, just as corporations seek market

opportunities. Politicians look for union support, and bureaucrats work to

increase their budgets.

These activities are not intrinsically evil but simple facts of incentives,

which motivate behaviour. As Logan (in Goyer, 2001:47) explains: "All

prisons, both public and private, face challenges in the areas of authority,

legitimacy, procedural, justice, accountability, liability, cost, security,

safety, corruptibility and so on. They face these challenges because of

41

the nature of their mission, not because of their incorporation as public or

private entities".

Conclusion

Overcrowded prisons gave impetus to the privatisation of prisons in South

Africa. Privatisation of prisons in South Africa is an attempt to alleviate

overcrowding in prisons.

42

CHAPTER 5

THEORECTICAL BACKGROUND OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

MANAGEMENT AUDIT

5.1 Introduction

The aim of this chapter is to give the theoretical background of employment

relations management, which entails monitoring and auditing. These

processes will provide management with information pertaining to aspects

such as:

Abnormal conduct of employees, which manifests itself in labour

turnover, absenteeism and work stoppages,

The employees' attitude, expectations and perceptions have an

influence on the employment relations.

5.2 Definition of Employment Relations Management Audit

Slabbert et al (1998: 23) define employment relations management audit as

a survey of a company's human resource and industrial relations policies. It

entails an analysis of these procedures, processes, policies and practices

with an evaluation of their quality and present functioning followed by

suggestions for improvement.

Richard Beckhard (in Fombrun et al.1984:236) adds that any improvement

process or change effort can be broken into three distinct phases, namely:

advancing a diagnosis of the present state;

preparing a clear statement of the desired future state.

developing a strategy for managing the transition from the present to the

desired state.

43

The employment relations management audit can be conducted annually

with the purpose of identifying any serious discrepancies or inadequacies in

the company's employment relations system that might have a detrimental

effect on the quality of employment relations.

5.3 Employment Relations Management Audit AS A Measuring Instrument

The auditing process comprises various aspects. The first step in

determining the contents of the employment relations management audit

will _be to compile the list of human resources and industrial relations

policies, functions procedures, and practices that any good employment

relations management system must include. The contents of the audit fall

within the ambit of the following categories:

Employment relations policies and strategies; and Employment

relations structures; procedures; processes and practices (Slabbed et al

1998: 23-22).

Practical experience seems to indicate that the "checklist" type of audit

questionnaire is the best method to employ in the employment relations

management audit. The "yes/no" type of questionnaire seems to fit in

the best with the audit philosophy; it is either "right or not right". As

already mentioned, a list of human resources and industrial relations

policies, procedures, functions and practices must be compiled for

inclusion in the audit questionnaire. A particular company's human

resources and industrial relations policies, functions and practices are

then compared with these set out in the audit questionnaire. Through

this comparison process, attention is pertinently drawn to those policies

or practices which are:

Not provided by the company

Implemented in discriminatory manner

Not effective in practice.

44

The employment relations management audit used in this study was drawn

up with the above mentioned consideration in mind.

5.4 Assessment of the Need for Employment Relations Management Audit

The employment relations management audit is a major organisational

intervention. It raises expectations that something will be done in response

to its findings.

The employment relations management audit should not be compiled to

only reflect the current status of labour relations and human resources in

Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison. But it should serve as an aid and

mechanism to enhance insight and understanding into the human resource

dynamics prevailing in Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison

Slabbert et al (1998: 23-30) explain that the interpretation phase places

major emphasis on qualitative rather than quantitative evaluations. The

information obtained by means of comments during the interview with

regard to the application of policies, practicability of policies and shop floor

management practices should be considered.

Owing to the underlying philosophy of the audit process; in terms of which a

policy or practice is either right or wrong; one might tend to be over

idealistic when recommending remedial action. Therefore, one must weigh

the recommended remedial action against employment relations

consequences that is what the result would be if it were implemented or not

It is therefore important to determine how employees feel about various

aspects related to their employment relationships. It forms part and parcel

of the process of exercising quality control in respect of employment

relations management. These surveys of "employee attitude" provide

valuable information on which to base decisions regarding employment

relations management. In this regard, Hofmeyer and Maitland (in Slabbert

45

et al .1998: 1998: 23-11) state the following" an employee attitude surveys

is a communication tool first of all. It is a procedure for stimulating the flow

of views and ideas upwards, downwards and laterally within the

organisation. This presents an opportunity for employees to express their

opinions and suggestions regarding the various aspects of their job for the

management to articulate company's policies and procedure in particular

areas and for peers at any level within the organisation to exchange facts

and feelings relevant to their common work experience. These surveys thus

provide valuable information on areas of employee satisfaction and

dissatisfaction. As a result, these can serve as early warning to

management to identify changes that taking place. In addition, these can

serve - as a guide to management to take remedial action and future

decisions".

5.5 Implementation of Remedial Action

According to Slabbert et al (1998: 23-24) remedial action can directly follow

the continuous surveys or intensive investigation. Remedial action is the

last step in the monitoring and auditing process. The success of the

monitoring and auditing process depends largely on the implementation of

remedial action. It is important that action plan with target date for the

implementation should be drawn up. This action plan can be used by top

management as a basis for controlling implementation of the various action

steps.

5.6 Conclusion

In order to compete with world class organizations, South African

companies need to constantly and continuously improve the way they

operate. They also need to put employment relations management at the

centre of their organisational competitiveness. The quality of employment

relations should therefore be viewed and dealt with as an integral part of

organisational management.

46

CHAPTER 6

INVESTIGATION

6.1 Introduction

In Chapters 2, 3, 4 and 5 a literature study was done regarding historical

development of private prisons in South Africa, the modern and current state

of South African private prisons, privatization in overseas countries and in

South Africa, and theoretical perspectives on employment management

relations audit. This chapter will focus more attention on analysis and

interpretation of data that was gathered after distributing :questionnaires to

management staff and employees for Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison.

6.2 Sample used during the research

A sample for the research project was drawn by the Human Resource

Manager at Kutama Sinthumule Maximum Security Prison. The respondents

were selected by means of probability sampling for the research project.

Grinnell (1993: 156) states that in probability sampling every member of the

population has equal chance of being included in the sample.

Although a subset of the population; the sample must have properties which

make it representative of the whole.

The sample of hundred and fifty respondents was drawn from a total

population of five hundred (500) employees. The respondents were drawn

in terms of their availability in their sections, due to the fact that employees

work different shifts.

The researcher used probability sampling in that each employee in the

population has the same probability of being selected. According to De Vos

(2002: 205) stratified random sampling is suitable for heterogeneous

populations because the inclusion of small subgroups percentage-wise can

be ensured. Stratetization consists of the universe being divided into a

number of strata that are mutually exclusive, and the members of which are

homogeneous with regards to some characteristics such as gender, home

language or age. The researcher divided his population in occupational

47

class, race and gender mainly to ensure that the different groups or

segments of a population acquire sufficient representation in the sample.

6.2.1 Representative sample

One of the major issues in sampling is to determine samples that best

represent a population so as to allow for an accurate generalization of

results, such a group is called a representative sample. The first means of

ensuring a representative sample is the use of a complete and correct

sampling frame. This is the list of all units from which the sample is to be

drawn.

Sampling, according to Kerlinger (1986) in As de Vos et al (1999 — 2002)

means taking any portion of a population or universe as representative of

that population or universe. This definition does not say that the sample

taken, or drawn as researchers say, is in fact representative. It is important

to understand the concept of representativeness and its relationship to

generalisability. We can only generalize the findings of a study when we can

assume that what we observed in the sample of subjects would also be

observed in any other group of subjects from the population.

6.2.2 Sample analysis of Management

The sample consisted of 47 representatives of Management from a total of

119 Managers. The sample of Management included Prison Director, Unit

Managers, Social Workers, Educationists, Health Workers, etc.

Race

POPULATION GROUPING

NUMBER

AFRICAN 37

COLOURED 0

INDIAN 1

WHITE 9

TOTAL 47

Table 1: Racial Grouping

48

Gender

GENDER NUMBER

MALE 35

FEMALE 12

TOTAL 47

Table 2: Gender

Age

AGE NUMBER

18 = 24 YEARS 0

25 — 34 YEARS 7

35 — 44 YEARS 25

45 — 54 YEARS 14

55 YEARS AND OLDER 1

TOTAL 47

Table 3: Age

Highest Academic Qualification

NUMBER

MATRIC 0

DIPLOMA 22

B degree 15

HONOURS 8

MASTERS 2

PHD 0

TOTAL 47

Table 4: Highest academic qualification

49

Current position

CURRENT POSITION SAMPLE

POPULATION PERCENTAGE

PRISON DIRECTOR 1

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGER 1

UNIT MANAGER 20

HEALTH WORKER 10

PSYCHOLOGIST 2

EDUCATIONIST 13

TOTAL 47

Table 6: Current position

Affiliations

AFFILIATIONS NUMBER

TRADE UNION 0

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION

0

NGO 0

NON-AFFILIATION 47

TOTAL 47

Table 7: Affiliations

6.2.3 Demographic details of employees

The sample consists of 103 employees who included both males and

females of Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison from the total population of

325 employees.

Race

POPULATION GROUPING

NUMBER

AFRICAN 82

COLOURED 3

INDIAN 0

WHITE 18

TOTAL 103

Table 8: Racial grouping

50

Gender

GENDER NUMBER

MALE 70

FEMALE 33

TOTAL 103

Table 9: Gender

Highest Academic Qualification

HIGHEST ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION

NUMBER

MATRIC 57

DIPLOMA 29

BA 15

HONOURS

MASTERS 0

PHD 0

TOTAL 103

Table 10: Highest academic qualification

Are you facilitated to the following organizations?

AFFILIATIONS NUMBER

POLITICAL ORGANIZATION

10

TRADE UNIONS 0

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION

32

NGO 0

NON-AFFILIATION 61

TOTAL 103

Table 11: Applications

6.3 Measuring instrument used during research

Open-ended questions were asked to make it easier for respondents to

answer. The questionnaires were accompanied by a covering letter

51

explaining the purpose and importance of the survey. See Annexures A

and B for the questionnaires used.

6.4 Application of questionnaire

The information was obtained from some of the respondents who completed

questionnaires at their workplace. Other respondents were given an

opportunity to fill out the questionnaires at their homes. A Human Resource

Manager collected the questionnaires on behalf of the researcher. A total of

one hundred and fifty.(150) questionnaires were distributed to respondents.

52

CHAPTER 7

RESULTS

7 RESPONSES GIVEN BY MANAGEMENT STAFF

The researcher personally scheduled appointments with the Human

Resource Manager, Prison Director and Work Council Chairperson

individually.

7.1 Response by Prison Director

Questions were put on the following issues:

How many warnings are given to the employees before a

disciplinary hearing can take place?

The employee is given verbal, written warning and final written

warning before he/she can appear in a disciplinary hearing. These

warnings will take between six to twelve months in operation.

Does the Presiding Officer consider the nature of the offence

before any punishment is meted out?

The Presiding Officer considers the nature of the offence, e.g. gross

negligence, absenteeism and gross insubordinations are dismissible

offences.

Is the disciplinary and grievance procedure accessible?

It is evident that every employee is furnished with disciplinary and

grievance procedure manuals at training. Presiding and Disciplinary

Officials undergo external courses to equip themselves with skills for

handling disciplinary hearings. The disciplinary process is corrective

in nature. Grievance takes about fourteen (14) working days for

finalization.

53

How do you prevent nepotism in terms of appointments?

An external company called Fidelity Services is an appointment agent for

SACM. In selection an applicant's place of resident is considered, whereby

preference is given to applicants who stay within a 90-kilometres radius of

Kutama Sinthumule (Louis Trichardt). Management also considers the

objectives of the Government such as to promote and empower local

communities.

How do you assist employees with regards to drug and alcohol

abuse?

Employee Assistance Programme renders services to employees who have

the history of alcohol and drug abuse. Senior Psychologist and human

resource personnel are involved in such programmes. SACM Management is

very strict with regards to alcohol abuse in that anytime employees can be

summoned for alcohol tests at short notice.

Does your company comply with the Labour Relations Act and

Basic Conditions of Employment Act since there are no Unions

operating in your Prison?

The Department of Correctional Services has controllers who always

see to it that the working environment complies with applicable

legislations in the country. The human resource section implements

policies which are in line with the Basic Conditions of Employment

Act, Labour Relations Act, Skills Development Act, etc.

Have your company been approached by Poperu or any other

labour movement for recognition?

No Union has approached the company for recognition but however, it

is also important for Management to have a sound relationship with

the Union in the organization.

54

(h) Is the Work Council fully representative of all employees?

Work Council represents all employees regardless of ethnic group or

race.

How do you prevent cultural and ethnic intolerance amongst

your employees?

SACM policies prohibit discrimination based on race, culture, sex,

ethnicity, etc.

Is there any transport for employees working night shift?

SACM does not provide transport for employees.

Does your leave include family responsibility leave?

Employees are offered three (3) days compassionate leave if they lost

a member of their family or their family member is sick.

(I) Do you think it is essential to refuse employees permission to

leave the premises during lunch time?

Yes.

Does your company recognize employee's qualifications on

appointment?

SACM only recognize a degree if it is a requirement for a specific

position.

How often do you evaluate the employee's performance?

55

There is a three (3) months assessment period or quarterly for

development purposes. After twelve (12) months an employee is

assessed so as to qualify for an award or notch promotion.

What kind of benefits is offered to employees?

SACM package includes benefits for medical scheme, and housing

allowance which is paid as part of salary.

Is your Management Team accessible?

- Management visits personnel sections every week.

7.2 Response by Chairperson of Work Council

The following questions were asked:

Is your Council informed of disciplinary hearings in time?

Work Council is not informed in time about pending disciplinary

hearings.

Are the disciplinary procedure and grievance manuals

accessible to your members?

Every employee is in possession of disciplinary procedure and

grievance manuals.

How many warnings are given before a disciplinary hearing can

take place?

Often employees are not given warnings before they appear in

disciplinary hearings. It is common that employees are summoned to

appear at disciplinary hearings without being given formal or informal

warnings.

56

Are you well trained for handling a disciplinary process?

Work Council Committee is not well trained to represent employees in

disciplinary hearings.

How is nepotism prevented in SACM?

Work Council pressurizes Management to advertise positions

internally.

Does your company's policy provide for study leave?

No study leave is provided by Management.

Does policy provide for family responsibility leave?

Policy provides for three (3) days for family responsibility and four (4)

months maternity leave.

7.3 Response by Human Resource Manager

Questions were put on the following issues:

Number of employees who left the service for the past twelve

months

Sixty three (63) employees left service.

Number of absentees for the past twelve (12) months

Seventy three (73) employees absented themselves from duty.

Number of grievances reported for the past twelve (12) months

Only two (2) grievances were registered.

57

Number of disciplinary steps taken in the past twelve (12)

months

Thirty five (35) disciplinary steps were taken.

Number of strikes that occurred in the past twelve (12) months

Only one (1) strike took place.

Number of Trade Union activities that took place in the past

twelve (12) months

No Trade Union activities took place.

7.4 Response of Managers by questionnaire

The following questions were distributed to Managers for their response

(See attached Annexure A).

Question 11

Which of the following statements best capture your general view of the

appropriate relationship between the Trade Union and SACM on major

socio-economic issues? (Circle the most appropriate answer)

FREQUENCY

SACM should consult Trade Unions 20

SACM should consider views of Trade Unions 10

SACM should consult Trade Unions on policy issues 5

Other: Specify 12

TOTAL 47

Table 2.1: Relationship between Trade Unions and SACM

58

Table 2.1 shows that 20 out of 47 respondents say SACM should consult with

Trade Unions, whereas 5 out of 47 says SACM should consult with Trade

Unions only on policy issues.

Question .12

Which of the following statements best capture your view on freedom of

association? (Circle the appropriate answer)

FREQUENCY

SACM should allow employees to join or form Trade Union of their own choice

5

SACM should allow employees to join and participate in the activities of the Work Council

30

SACM should not recognize any Labour Organizations 12

Other: Specify 0

TOTAL 47

Table 2.2: Freedom of association

Table 2.2 represents question 12 which captures freedom of association. It

shows that 30 out of 47 respondents says that SACM should allow employees

to join and participate in the activities of Work Council whilst 12 out 47

respondents says SACM should not recognize any Labour Organizations.

Question 13

How would you generally characterize your current job? (Circle the most

appropriate answer)

FREQUENCY

Policy orientated 4

Service orientated 15

Support orientated 28

59

TOTAL

47

Table 3.3: Categorization of current job

Table 3.3 shows that 28 out of 47 Managers current job is support

orientated.

Question 14

How important is the following factors in your capacity to discipline your

subordinates?

YES NO

Disciplinary procedures are cumbersome to administrate

42

5

You are not familiar with the rules for imposing discipline

44 3

You feel the authority is not respected by your subordinates

2

45

The results of discipline take too long in coming 0 47

Disciplinary procedures cause too much conflict 0 47

Other: Specify 0 0

TOTAL 47

Table 3.4 shows that all the respondents agree that disciplinary procedures do

not cause conflict and 44 out of 47 respondents are not familiar with the rules.

Question 15

As a Senior Manager, if you feel constrained by existing rules or regulations,

what do you generally do? (Circle the appropriate answer)

Ignore the rules or regulations 0

Try to negotiate your way around the rules or regulations

10

Try to change the rules or regulations 0

60

Submit to change the rules and regulations 37

TOTAL 47

Table 3.5: Responses of respondents to existing rules

Table 3.5 shows that 37 out of 47 respondents submit to change the rules

whilst 10 out of 47 try to negotiate their way around the rules and

regulations.

Question 16

How often do you have to manage conflict amongst your employees?

VERY OFTEN

OFTEN VERY

SELDOM NEVER TOTAL

3 25 17 2 47

Table 3.6: Views of respondents on conflict management

Table 3.6 shows that 25 out of 47 respondents often manage conflict

amongst their employees whilst 2 out of 47 do not manage any conflict

among their employees.

Question 17

How often do the following statements cause problems in your company?

OFTEN SOMETIMES NEVER TOTAL

Ethnic differences 40 5 2 47 Sexual harassment 5 15 27 47 Cultural differences 40 5 2 47 Racial differences 6 4 37 47 Political differences 30 10 7 47 Gender differences 28 12 7 47 Personality conflict ' 40 4 3 47 Access to resource 40 4 3 47 Access to information 43 3 1 47 Different policy position 20 12 15 47

61

Poor performance 2 6 39 47 Table 3.7: Respondents opinion about organizational problems

Table 3.7 clearly shows that access to information and cultural differences

are problems in that 40 out of 47 respondents often regard cultural

differences as a problem and 43 out of 47 says that they often do not have

access to information. Gender difference is also serious.

Question 18

How would you rank the following attributes of Managers?

GOOD AVERAGE POOR TOTAL

Efficiency 47 0 0 47

Time Management 29 11 7 47

Projects Management 15 25 7 47

Communication skills 42 5 0 47

Commitment to complete task

20 25 2

47

Technical knowledge 22 20 5 47

Financial Management 47 0 0 47

Capacity to motivate subordinates

34 6 7

47

Conflict resolution skills 0 33 14 47

Initiatives 30 12 5 47

Experience 20 17 10 47

Commitment to redress social inequality

0 10 37

47

Table 3.8: Respondents attributes to Managers

Question 19

Have you personally experienced any incident of overt discrimination as a

Senior Manager in SACM?

YES NO TOTAL

Disability 0 47 47

Race 4 43 47

62

Gender 8 39 47

Religion 0 47 47

Ethnicity 34 13 47

Table 3.9: Views of respondents with regard to discrimination

Question 20

In practice, what are three (3) most important factors for promotion in

SACM?

NUMBER

Advancing transformation 0

Affirmative Action 0

Innovative Management 42

Making no mistakes 5

Table 3.10: Opinions of respondents regarding promotions

Table 3.10 shows that 42 out of 47 respondents say that you have to be

innovative in order to be considered for promotion. Making no mistakes was

mentioned by 5 respondents.

Question 21

Which of the following statements do you think best describe Management

style in SACM?

NUMBER

Senior Manager make decisions and then inform their subordinates

43

Senior Managers consult with their subordinates before making decisions

2

Senior Managers involve their subordinates in decision-making

2

TOTAL 47

Table 4.1: Views of respondents concerning decision-making

63

Table 4.1 shows that 43 out of 47 respondents feel that Management does not

consult with subordinates before taking decisions.

Question 22

What is your response to the following statements about corruption in

SACM?

AGREE DISAGREE

Corruption is mostly inherited from the previous regime

7 40

SACM takes effective steps to prevent corruption 44 3

Corrupt officials are dealt with accordingly 42 5

Corruption is prevalent in SACM 0 47

TOTAL 47 47

Table 4.2: Opinions of respondents regarding corruption

It is evident that most respondents agree corruption is not prevalent in

SACM.

Question 23

What is your perception on the following?

Policy on Affirmative Action is clearly

communicated to subordinates 4

There is no racial discrimination 23

There is no gender representivity 20

TOTAL 47

Table 4.3: Perception on Policy

Table 4.3 shows that all respondents agrees that there is no policy on

Affirmative Action.

64

Question 24

State the actual number of disciplinary actions taken against employees in

the previous twelve (12) months?

Disciplinary actions taken

35

Table 4.4: Represents disciplinary actions taken

Table 4.4 shows that 35 disciplinary actions against employees have been

instituted.

7.5 Response of employees by questionnaire

The following questions were distributed to employees for their response

(See attached Annexure B):

Question 7

How would you rank the following attributes of Human Resource

Management in your organization?

GOOD POOR

Employees are correctly placed in their positions 52 51

Appraisal process is accurately assessing performance

41 62

TOTAL 103

Table 5.1: Respondent's views regarding attributes of Human Resource

Management

Question 8

How often do the following processes take place at SACM? (Circle the

correct answer)

65

ALWAYS OFTEN NEVER

Performance is driven by rewards 3 30 70

Training and career planning drive performance

0 3 100

Performance appraisal provides an objective overview of my colleagues performance

0 12 91

Performance appraisal helps to identify my training needs

0 40 63

Performance appraisal assists my career development and planning

0 33 70

Results of my assessment is fair and objective

12 30 61

Restructuring is not used as a disciplinary process

0 0 103

TOTAL 103

Table 5.2: Respondents views on merit assessment

Table 5.2 represents question 8 with regards to merit and performance

appraisal. It shows that 70 out of 103 respondents feel that performance is

not reward-driven.

Question 9

How would you rate the situations in your company? (Circle the correct

answer)

YES NO

Our human resource policies are consistent and fair

70 33

My salary is sufficient to maintain my family 20 83

Our Selection Panel is doing a fine job 80 23

TOTAL 103

Table 5.3: Views of respondents on policies and remuneration

Table 5.3 shows that 70 out of 103 respondents agree that their human

resource policies are good and 80 out of 103 also feels that their Selection

Panel is doing a fine job.

66

Question 10

Do you consider yourself to be adequately trained for your job? (Circle the

correct answer)

YES NO PARTIALLY TOTAL

61 0 42 103 Table 5.4: Views of respondents on training

Table 5.4 shows that 61 out of 103 respondents agree that they are trained

adequately for their current job.

Question 11

What is the most important factor that enabled you to adapt to your current

job?

Learning from my mistakes 2

Studying the rules and regulations 51

My colleagues shared with me important information during working hours

20

Brainstorming with my peers after hours 1

Formal orientation and induction 29

Others: Specify 0

TOTAL 103

Table 5.5: Respondents' opinion regarding their adaptation to work

Table 5.5 shows that 51 out of 103 respondents are conversant with rules

and regulations which help them to adapt to their current job.

Question 12

Have you personally experienced any incident of overt discrimination in

SACM?

YES NO TOTAL

83 20 103

67

Table 5.6: Perception of respondents regarding discrimination

Table 5.6 shows that 83 out of 103 respondents feels that there is

discrimination at SACM.

Question 13

If yes on question 12, circle the basis of discrimination?

Disability 0

Race 2

Gender 21

Religion 0

Ethnicity 57

Other: Specify culture 3

TOTAL 83

Table 5.7: Respondents view on discrimination

Table 5.7 shows that 57 out of 83 respondents feel that there is ethnic

discrimination.

Question 14

What are the most important factors considered for promotion in your

company?

Advancing transformation 0

Affirmative Action 0

Innovative Management 0

Nepotism 15

Performing your job to your Supervisors' satisfaction

88

TOTAL 103

Table 5.8: Respondents views on promotions

Table 5.8 shows that 88 respondents out of 103 belief that your performance

have to satisfy your Supervisor before you can be promoted.

68

Question 15

How satisfied are you with the following?

SATISFIED DISSATISFIED

The way employees resign from the service 29 74

The manner in which Management involves employees in decision-making

5 98

The way in which grievances are handled 30 73

The manner in which disciplinary process is applied

44 59

The-positive impact of Work Council on Management

12 91

Contribution of Work Council to bilateral meetings

63 40

No recognized Trade Unions operates in your institution

12 91

The way in which benefits are distributed 34 69

TOTAL 103

Table 6.1: Level of satisfaction of respondents

Table 6.1 shows that 98 out of 103 respondents are not satisfied with the

manner in which Management excludes employees in decision-making.

Question 16

Are you allowed freedorii of association?

YES

NO

2

101 Table 6.2: Degree of freedom of association

Table 6.2 shows that 101 out of 103 respondents agree that there is no

freedom of association.

69

Question 17

Is there any dispute resolution mechanisms?

YES

NO

3

100 Table 6.3: Respondents' views on dispute mechanisms

Table 6.3 shows 100 out of 103 respondents agree that there is no dispute

resolution mechanism.

Question 18

If yes, what type of dispute resolution mechanism? Please specify.

Three out 103 respondents described CCMA as a dispute resolution

mechanism.

Question 19

Do these policies exist in SACM?

• YES NO

Gender equity 0 103 Affirmative Action 0 103 Employee Assistance Programme 78 25

TOTAL 103

Table 6.5: Views of respondents to the existing policies

Table 6.5 shows that all respondents agree that there is no policy on gender

equity and Affirmative Action but however, 78 out of 103 agrees that there is

policy on Employee Assistance Programme.

Question 20

Which of the following best describe the Management style in Kutama

Sinthumule Private Prison?

70

Senior Managers make decisions and then inform their employees

98

Senior Managers consult with employees before making decisions

0

Senior Managers share decisions taken with their employees

5

TOTAL 103

Table 7.1: Perception of respondents on the Management style of SACM

Table 7.1 shows that 98 out of 103 agree that Management takes unilateral

decisions.

Question 21

What are your responses to the following statements about working

conditions in SACM?

AGREE DISAGREE

I do not feel free to talk in meetings in the presence of my Seniors

60 43

I have an important role to play in making key decisions in the company

9 94

I don't feel free to challenge my Seniors' views 93 10

I accomplished worthwhile things but overall the job is pointless

0 103

My salary is equivalent to the job I do 10 93

Racial differences affects effective functioning in my section

81 22

If I am offered a lucrative package somewhere I will leave SACM

77 26

TOTAL 103

Table 7.2: Views of respondents on the working conditions

Table 7.2 shows that 94 out of 103 do not agree that they have important

roles to play in making key decisions in their organization, whilst 77 out of

103 agrees that they will resign if offered a lucrative package somewhere

else.

71

Question 22

What is your response to the following statements about corruption in

SACM?

AGREE DISAGREE

Corrupt officials are dealt with accordingly 100 3

Corruption is not common in SACM 100 3

Ex-members of DCS adapted quickly to the changes in SACM

90 13

Senior officials of DCS are given preferential treatment regarding high positions

91 12

Former DCS employees hold too much power 91 12

TOTAL 103

Table 7.3: Views of respondents on corruption

Table 7.3 shows that 100 out of 103 respondents agree that corruption is not

prevalent in SACM, but however 91 out of 103 agrees that former DCS

officials are given preferential treatment in appointment for high positions.

Question 23

How should conditions of service in SACM be determined?

By central agreement 60

By agreement in a Management Bargaining Council

43

On individual basis 0

TOTAL 103

Table 7.4: Determination of service conditions

Table 7.4 shows that 60 out of 103 respondents agree that service

conditions should be determined by central agreement.

72

CHAPTER 8

8. INTERPRETATION

The questionnaires of which copies are enclosed as "Annexures A and B"

are the following point of discussion for interpretation purposes. Since the

population consisted of only 150 respondents from population of 503,

references will be made to numbers such as "5 out of 47" when data is

presented and percentages will be made available where necessary.

8.1 Management responses

Relationship between Trade Union and SACM on major socio-

economic issues (Question 11)

Table 2.1 shows that 20 out of 47 respondents regard consultation

with Trade Unions to be very important especially when it comes to

issues which need consensus between employers and employees.

The researcher agrees that Trade Unions should operate and take

part in major socio-economic issues which affects employees and

the country at large.

Freedom of association (Question 12)

Table 2.2 shows that 30 out of 47 respondents favour the existing

relationship with Work Council, thus they prefer SACM not to allow

employees to join Trade Unions.

The researcher believes that an employee has the fundamental right

to participate in forming a trade union or union federation or to join a

trade union, of his/her choice.

73

Job categorization (Question 13)

Table 3.3 shows that 28 out of 47 Managers' current job is support

orientated.

Importance of discipline (Question 14)

Table 3.4 shows that all respondents agrees that disciplinary

procedures do not,cause conflicts, and 44 out of 47 respondents are

not familiar with the rules.

The researcher generally accepts that the employer has the right to

maintain and enforce discipline in the workplace. The right has its

own origin in the common law, more particularly in the Contract of

Employment. The right to discipline is a term which is implied by the

law in the contract of employment. In general discipline must be

based on the concept of progressive discipline. This means

employees must know and understand what behaviour is required

from them (Basson et al; 2000: 70 — 71).

Constrains of existing rules (Question 15)

Table 3.5 shows that 30 out of 47 respondents always comply with

the rules. The researcher agrees to a limited extent with

respondents. However, rules must not be rigid, but flexible.

Respondents should apply their discretion in the implementation

rules.

Conflict Management (Question 16)

Table 3.6 shows that 25 out of 47 respondents often manage

conflict amongst their subordinates. The researcher will

substantiate this response when interpreting table 3.7 below.

74

Organizational problems (Question 17)

Table 3.7 shows that 40 out of 47 respondents regard cultural

differences as a problem and also 43 out of 47 says that they don't

have access to information.

It is clear that conflict management is often regarded as a problem

at Kutama Sinthumule, which is created by ethnic and cultural

differences.

The researcher agrees that such problems regarding cultural

differences might arise especially for those respondents who are not

originating from the Limpopo Province. It is clear that the

recruitment is focused within the community of Limpopo which

includes Makadu, Venda and Polokwane communities. Such

communities are known to uphold their culture.

Manager's attributes (Question 18)

Table 3.8 shows that Managers are efficient in financial

management since 47 out of 47 say they are good in efficiency and

financial management. Managers are also ranked high concerning

communication skills. Substantial room for improvement was

mentioned regarding time management, project management,

commitment to complete tasks, technical knowledge, capacity to

motivate employees, conflict resolution skills, initiatives experience

and commitment to repress special activity.

Experiences with regards to discrimination (Question 19)

Table 3.9 shows that 34 out of 47 respondents agree that there is

ethnic discrimination at Kutama Sinthumule whilst 47 out of 47

respondents agree that disabled employees are not discriminated

against and there is no discrimination with respect to religion. There

is to a lesser extent discrimination regarding race and gender.

75

Table 3.9 shows that 34 out of 47 respondents agreed that there is

ethnic discrimination at Kutama Sinthumule whilst 47 out 47

respondents agree that the disabled are not discriminated against.

Conditions of promotion (Question 20)

Table 3.10 shows that 42 out of 47 respondents say that you have

to be innovative in order to be considered for promotion.

Management style (Question 21)

Table 4.1 shows that 45 out of 47 respondents feel that

Management does not consult with subordinates before taking

decisions.

The researcher feels that Management is taking unilateral decisions.

Corruption (Question 22)

Table 4.2 show that most respondents agree that corruption is not

prevalent in SACM and that corrupt officials are dealt with

accordingly.

The researcher also agrees that there is no case of corruption

reported at SACM. The researcher also observed that SACM is

serious in combating corruption since it might cost them their

contract with DCS.

Current policies (Question 23)

Table 4.3 shows that all respondents agree that there is no policy on

Affirmative Action and that there is no gender representivity. Most

experience there is no racial discrimination.

76

(14) Disciplinary actions (Question 24)

Table 4.4 shows that 35 disciplinary actions against employees

have been instituted in the last twelve (12) months in the

Organization.

8.2 Employee responses to questionnaire

Human Resource attributes (Annexure B, Question 7)

Table 5.1 shows that about 50% or more of the respondents are of

the opinion that employees are not correctly placed in their positions

and the appraisal process is not accurately assessing performance.

Performance assessment (Question 8)

Table 5.2 shows that 70 out of 103 feel that performance is never

reward driven. Almost 100 out of 103 think that training and career

planning does not enhance their performance. Ninety-one out of

one hundred and three respondents feel that performance appraisal

does not provide an objective overview of their performance. While

70 out of 103 respondents feel that performance appraisal does not

help in identifying and developing their career. Lastly, 61 out of 103

respondents feel that results are not fair and objective.

The main conclusion is that the present performance appraisal

system in use is grossly ineffective.

Human Resource Policies (Question 9)

Table 5.3 shows that 70 out of 103 respondents belief that their

human resource policies are good and consistent, whilst 80 of 103

respondents also feel that their selection panel is doing a fine job.

77

However, 83 respondents out of 103 are dissatisfied with their salary

package.

Training development (Question 10)

Table 5.4 shows that 61 out of 103 respondents agree that they are

trained adequately for their current job — 42 are only partially

satisfied.

Adaptation to current jobs (Question 11)

Table 5.5 shows that 51 out of 103 respondents learned their work

through rules and regulations. They are conversant with the

regulations which make it easy for them to adapt to their current job.

The second factor which assists them is through formal induction

and orientation and third sharing information by colleagues.

Discrimination (Question 12)

Table 5.6 shows that 83 out of 103 respondents feel that there is

discrimination at SACM.

Type of discrimination (Question 13)

Table 5.7 shows that 80 out of 103 respondents feel that there is

ethnic discrimination while 16 out of 103 specifies gender

discrimination as the problem.

Conditions for promotion (Question 14)

Table 5.8 shows that 83 out of 103 respondents agree that

promotion should be based on excellent performance. 15

Mentioned that nepotism also plays a role in this regard.

78

Employee satisfaction (Question 15)

Table 6.1 shows that 74 out of 103 respondents are not satisfied

with the way their colleagues resign from service. Ninety-eight out

of hundred and three respondents feel that they are not participating

in decision-making. Seventy-three out of one hundred and three are

dissatisfied with the way in which grievances are handled. Fifty-nine

out of hundred and three respondents are not satisfied with the

disciplinary process. Ninety-one out of one hundred and three

respondents are not satisfied with the impact of the Work Council on

management and the fact that there is no recognized trade union

operating in SACM was mentioned by all people. Sixty-nine out of

hundred and three respondents are not satisfied with the way

benefits are distributed.

It is noticeable that great dissatisfaction exists amongst employees

regarding a range of factors.

Freedom of association (Question 16)

Table 6.2 shows that 101 out of 103 respondents agree that there is

no freedom of association.

The researcher must emphasize however that employees are not

expressly forbidden from associating freely.

Dispute mechanism (Question 17)

Table 6.3 shows that 100 out of 103 respondents agree that there is

no dispute resolution mechanism.

The researcher must indicate that the Work Council should be

considered as a form of dispute resolution mechanism.

79

(12) Type of dispute resolution mechanism (Question 18)

Three out hun'dred and three respondents clearly understood and

described dispute resolution mechanism as COMA.

Employee relations policies (Question 19)

Table 6.5 shows that all respondents agree that there is no gender

equity and Affirmative Action Policies. Respondents are however

mostly aware of the employee assistance programmes in SACM.

Management style (Question 20)

Table 7.1 shows that 98 out of 103 respondents feel that

Management do not involve them in decision-making.

Working conditions (Question 21)

Table 7.2 shows that 94 out of 103 do not agree that they have

important roles to play in making key decisions in their organization

whilst 77 out of 103 agree that they will resign if offered a lucrative

offer somewhere else. It is evident that 93 out of 103 respondents

do not feel free to challenge decisions of their Supervisors.

The majority are of the opinion that their salary is not equivalent to

the jobs they do and that racial differences affect effective

functioning in their work.

Corruption (Question 22)

Table 7.3 shows that 100 out of 103 respondents agree that

corruption is not prevalent in SACM, but that 91 out of 103 agrees

that former DCS officials are given preferential treatment in

appointment for high positions and that 91 are of the opinion that

former DCS employees hold too much power.

80

(17) Collective bargaining (Question 23)

Table 7.4 shows that 60 out of 103 respondents agree that service

conditions should be determined by central agreement. A

substantial number (43) agree that this should be negotiated at

Bargain Council level.

81

CHAPTER 9

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS

MANAGEMENT AUDIT CONDUCTED IN KUTAMA SINTHUMULE PRIVATE

PRISON

9.1 Introduction

Chapters 6, 7 and 8 have dealt extensively with the presentation and

interpretation of the empirical data. This chapter will concentrate on the

main conclusions and recommendations.

9.2 Aim of the study

The aim of the study was to determine employee's attitudes, opinions,

expectations and perceptions with regard to various factors relating to the

employment relationship and which can influence the quality of employment

relations.

9.3 Objectives of the study

The main objectives of the study were the following:

Describe the employee's attitude towards South African's Private

Prison.

Determine whether employment relation management processes and

procedures are effectively applied within the Private Prison.

Evaluate whether there are discrepancies in the application of the

employment relations process and procedures which may have a

negative impact on the functioning of employees in the Private Prison.

The first objective was realized in Chapters 6, 7 and 8 of this study where the

employees' attitudes towards Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison were clearly

established. It was shown in that chapter that the employee's morale is

generally low and they are dissatisfied with the existing manner in which

82

employee relations are managed. It is however important to acknowledge that

employees are not intending to leave the Private Prison so as to pursue their

careers elsewhere.

The second objective could only be partly realized. At the outset the

researcher was informed by the Chairperson of the Work Council that

employment relations policy, processes and procedures are applicable on

paper, but however not effectively applied within the Private Prison. It was

evident that management does not consult the Work Council or employees

in matters which affect them but only inform them about decisions taken

(See Table 4.1).

The third objective, mainly to evaluate whether there are discrepancies in the

application of the management processes and procedures, which may have

a negative impact on the functioning of employees in the Private Prison, was

realized completely although the sample was very small.

A comprehensive audit of the employment relations management was

conducted and the following conclusions can be drawn:

9.4 Conclusion of the research findings

There is an urgent need for the recognition of a trade union which will

operate in SACM, based on the wishes of the employees and judged from

the autocratic management style of management.

9.4.1 The existing Work Council does not fulfill the needs of employees and it is

not possible to influence any management decisions substantially which are

to be taken, because of the following:

The current bilateral meetings between the work council and

management do not have the effect of concluding and binding

resolutions such as the case of bargaining council.

The work council does not have the muscle to call any protected

strike since there is no dispute resolution mechanism (See Table 6.3).

83

The work council does not have the capacity to represent employees

in disciplinary hearings and grievance process properly, since they

are not informed on time about pending disciplinary hearings and they

are not effectively trained to represent employees in disciplinary

processes (See paragraph 6.4.1.2 a and b).

The Work Council does not participate in the selection process or new

appointments.

Grievance and disciplinary cases are not conducted in a fair manner

(See Table 6.1).

9.5 Discrepancies in management procedure

There is a need for management to introduce policies and procedures on

gender equity and affirmative action. Females are not well represented in the

senior management. Appointments are not in line with affirmative action

policies in our country. It was also observed that there is a serious need to

deal with ethnic discrimination so as to avoid demoralization of employees

when performing their duties (See Table 5.7). Employees are not satisfied

with their remuneration (See Table 7.2), performance appraisal systems and

promotions (See Tables 5.2 and 5.8).

9.6 Brief summary of an audit

It appears from the audit that disciplinary and grievance procedure manuals

and policies on Code of Conduct are in place. However, serious

shortcomings exist especially in terms of performance appraisal, training and

development, remuneration packages, representation and decision-making.

In order to sustain good employee relations, management should urgently

attend to these problems.

9.7 Recommendations

Based on the findings of the audit the following recommendations are made:

84

9.7.1 Equity and discrimination

There is a need for Management to formulate policies on gender equity and

affirmative action. It is evident that the staff structures at Kutama Sinthumule

are not representative of the diverse population of the Private Prison.

Females are not well represented in the Senior Management. Bring

appointments in line with affirmative action Policies in our country. Deal with

ethnic discrimination so as to avoid demoralization of employees when

performing their duties (See Table 5.7).

9.8 Work Council

In the absence of union, the work council should have a stake in

management of SACM.

The work council should participate in recommendations regarding

appointments and in promotions.

The work council should be used as a mechanism towards more

participative management.

The work council should contribute towards decision-making in

achieving organizational goals and objectives and should not simply

be a rubberstamp of management decisions.

The purpose and functions of the work council should be properly

formulated and endorsed by management.

Work council members should keep employees informed of decisions

taken on the work council and by management.

Work council members should be properly trained by SACM.

85

9.9 Personnel policies and procedures

Personnel policies and procedures must be communicated to

employees regularly so that they can apply it correctly and avoid

confusion.

Personnel policies and procedures are often vague, incomplete or do

not exist at all. It is hereby recommended that personnel policies and

procedures should all be revised in order to be clear and transparent

to everyone.

_ The present organizational structure does not provide ample

promotional opportunities on higher levels.

It is recommended that all personnel policies and procedures must be

provided to Unit Managers for discussion with their personnel.

9.10 Employee relations

Managers and supervisors need extensive training in employee

relations in order to be able to maintain labour peace

Labour relations module must form part of the curriculum at training

colleges.

It is important for employees to know their rights at the work place.

There is a need for full time Shop Stewards to produce constructive

and sound labour relations between Management and the Work

Council.

Make employees and the work council members conversant with the

disciplinary and grievance procedure manuals.

86

9.11 Management style

Management must give employees the opportunity to participate in

decision-making. The current autocratic management strategy should

be rectified.

Management by objective (MBO) as a management strategy should

be considered.

9.12 Performance appraisal

A new system for performance appraisal should be developed.

Definite goals for a section must be set to be measured for

consideration. If the section performs according to those goals, they

must get merit awards, otherwise none of them should get.

9.13 Training and development

SACM should train and develop all employees in order for them to

perform their jobs properly. In this way they will be empowered with

skills relevant to their jobs.

Training management should be career orientated.

9.14 Human Resource

Although human resource policies are generally good, it is

recommended that it be utilized better to have a positive impact on

employment relations.

It is also recommended that employees must be accurately placed

and clear goals and standards be set regarding their performances.

Restructure systems of remuneration and promotion.

9.15 Conclusion

87

Throughout this study, the researcher emphasized the importance of

approaching and managing employment relations in a strategic way. The

global village has no place for poor performance organizations.

It can be concluded from the above exposition that the perception of the

employees of Kutama Sinthumule are negative regarding a number of issues

but the positive aspects in the relationship between employees and

management can carry this institution during the forthcoming period of

adapting to changes.

In the conclusion, it needs to be mentioned that SACM to survive, it needs to

continuously improve the way it operates. They have to be able to compete

with the "best". This quest for competitiveness in global economy is forcing

organization to seriously reconsider the way they manage their employees.

Strategic employment relations management at SACM should put the

employment relationships at the center of organizational competitiveness

(Slabbert et al, 23: 33). The quality of employment relations is therefore to

be viewed and dealt with as an integral part of general organizational

restructuring.

88

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Africa Watch Prison Project: Prison conditions in South Africa, 1994.

Annual Report of the Department of Correctional Services for the period 1

January 2001 to 31 March 2002.

Arguments for and against Private Prison contracting:

http://www.ucc.uconn.edu/ —www.soci/procons.htm/

Ary, D. Jacobs, L.L & Razavieh, L.E. 1985. Introduction to research in Education.

3 rd Edition. New York: Holt.

Basson, A. et al, 2000. Essential Labour Law Relations Act, Publications, South

Africa.

Botha, H., 2000. The Guide to the Labour Relations Act, Publications, South

Africa.

Cloete, M.G.T. & Steven, R., 1990: Criminology: Pretoria.

Logan, C.H., 1990. Private Prisons: Cons and Pros. New York: Oxford

University Press. Page 41 — 48.

Congress of South African Union, Volume 113, The Shop Steward, 2002.

Douglas McDonald, 1990: Private Prisons and the Public Interest. Rugters USA.

Fombrun, C.J., Tichy, N.M. & Devanna, M.A., 1984. Strategic Human Resource

Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. United States of America.

Geoffrey F Segal: Corporate Corrections: http://www.rppi.orq ./prison/

Goyer, K.C., 2000. Prison Privatization in South Africa. Institute for Security

Studies.

89

Letchmiah, D., 2000. Maintaining Socio-Economic Objectives in Public Private

Partnership-A Case Study: Anderson Publishing Co., Cincinnati, USA

http://intranet.dcs.gov.za/APOPS

Matshego, B.J., 1991. The Role of the Prison Social Worker with Special

Reference to the Implementation of a Problem-solving Treatment Programme

for Juveniles at Odi Prison in Bophuthatswana: University of Bophuthatswana.

Moss, K.E., 1988: Writing Research Proposals. In R.M. Grinnel, Jr Social Work

Research and Education. 3 rd Edition. Itasca: E.F. Peacock Publisher, Inc.

Mouton, J. & Marais, C.H., 1988: Research Methodology: Basic Concepts in the

Methodology of Social Sciences: Pretoria: HSRC.

Nedbank ISS. Crime Index, Volume 5.

Nel, P.S., Gerber, P.D., Van Wyk, P.S., Haasbroek, G.D., Schultz, H.B., Sono, T. &

Werner, A., 2001. Human Resources Management, 5th Edition. Oxford University

Press, South Africa, Cape Town.

Neser, J.J., Cilliers, C.H., & Swart, D.N.1985. Guide 1 for PNL 100-C: Pretoria:

University of South Africa.

Pell, M. et al, 1985. Social Science Research Methods. African Handbook Nigeria

Publishers Services Ltd, Nigeria.

[email protected]

Rautenbach, F. and 1999. Liberating South African Labour from the Law: CTP

Book Printers, Cape Town.

Ring, C.R., 1987. Contracting for the Operation of Private Prisons (Pros and

Cons). College Park, American Correctional Association.

Slabbert, J.A., Prinsloo, J.J., Swanepoel, B.J. & Backer, W., 1998. Managing

Employment Relations in South Africa: Butterworth, Publishers, Cape Town.

90

Trade Union Research Project, 30/06/2000

Van der Walt, P.J., Cronje, G., Smit, B.F., & Van der Westhuizen, T.1977.

Introduction to Criminology. Pretoria: University of South Africa

91

TABLE OF STATUTES

Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 1997 (Act number 75 of 1997).

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act number 108 of 1996).

Employment Equity Act, 1998 (Act number 55 of 1998).

Labour Relations Act, 1995 (Act number 66 of 1995).

Skills Development Act, 1998 (Act number 97 of 1998).

92

ANNEXURE A

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR MANAGEMENT: EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MANAGEMNT AUDIT IN KUTAMA SINTHUMULE PRIVATE PRISON

This questionnaire is part of an independent research project. Please be assured that all your answers will remain anonymous. No names, or other ways of identifying individual respondents will be used in any version of the result of this audit. No one other than the researcher will have access to your questionnaire. After completing the questionnaire please return it to the researcher personally.

SECTION ONE: DEMOGRAPHICS

I would like to begin with a few demographic details

Please fill in the following information about yourself

Race

African Coloured Indian White 1 2 3 4

Gender

Male

Female 1

2

Education

Highest qualification Diploma/BA/MA/PHD Name of Institution Year of completion Course study

Did you have any formal management training prior to your appointment in the management position at Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison?

Circle the correct answer

Yes No 2 1

4. If yes; please specify.

'Degree Name of institution Year of completion

1

5. Did you have any management experience before taking your management job in Kutama Sinthumule ?(Circle the correct answer)

Yes

No 1

2

6. If yes, in section did you gain this experience? ( Circle the correct answer)

Business 1 Education 2 NG0' S 3 Community Organisation 4 Labour Movement 5 Other (please specify) 6

7. What is your current position?

8. What was your previous position in your past job? (Please circle the correct answer)

9. Were you an active member (i.e. held a leadership position of a political party; trade union; community organisation; or non-governmental organisation prior to joining Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison?

Yes No Political organisation 1 2 Community organisation 1 2 Trade union 1 2 Non-governmental organisation 1 2

10 Are you currently participating in the activities of a political party; trade union; community organisation; or non-governmental organisation?

Yes

No 1

2

2

SECTION TWO: PERSPECTIVE ON THE SACM AND DEVELOPMENT

In this section I would like to ask you a few general questions about your views on the development

11 Which of the following statements best capture your general view of the appropriate relationship between the trade union and SACM on major socio-economic issues? (Circle the most appropriate answer)

SACM should consult trade unions with a view to reaching consensus on specific issues

1

SACM should consider the views of the trade unions; before taking certain decisions

2

SACM should not consult trade unions when issuing policy statements/decisions

3

Other (please specify) 4

12 Which of the following statements best capture your view on freedom of association? (Circle the appropriate answer)

SACM should allow employees to join and form trade union of their own choice. SACM should only allow employees to join and participate in the activities of the work council. SACM should not recognize any labour organisation Other (please specify )

SECTION THREE: CURRENT PRACTICE AS A SENIOR MANAGER

13 How would you generally characterise your current job? (Circle the best answer)

Policy oriented Service oriented Support oriented

Please substantiate on your answer if you wish

3

14 How important are the following factors in your capacity to discipline your subordinate?

Discipline must be weighed against possible ethnic/political fallout

Not important Very important

Disciplinary procedure are cumbersome to administrate

1 2

You are not familiar with the rules for imposing discipline

1 2

You feel your authority is not respected by your subordinates

1 2

The results of discipline take too long in coming 1 2 Disciplinary procedures cause too much conflict 1 2 Other (please specify) 1 2

15 As a Senior Manager, do you feel constrained by existing rules or regulations, what do you generally do? (Circle the best answer)

Ignore the rules or regulations Try to negotiate your way around the rules or regulations Try to change the rules or regulations Submit to the rules or regulations

16 How often do you have to manage conflict among your staff members?

Very often Often Seldom Never 1 2 3 4

17 How often do the following statements cause problems in your company?

Often Sometimes Never Ethnic differences 1 2 3 Sexual harassment 1 2 3 Cultural differences 1 2 3 Racial differences 1 2 3 Political differences 1 2 3 Gender differences 1 2 3 Personality conflict 1 2 3 Access to resources 1 2 3 Access to information 1 2 3 Different policy position 1 2 3 Poor performance 1 2 3

4

18 How would you rank the following attributes of middle management? (Unit managers)

Excellent Good Adequate poor Efficiency 1 2 3 4 Time management 1 2 3 4 Communication skills 1 2 3 4 Project management 1 2 3 4 Commitment to complete a task

1 2 3 4

Technical knowledge 1 2 3 4 Financial management 1 2 3 4 Capacity to motivate subordinates

1 2 3 4

Conflict resolution skills 1 2 3 4 Initiative 1 2 3 4 Experience 1 2 3 4 Commitment to redress social inequalities

1 2 3 4

19 Have you personally experienced any incident of overt discrimination as a Senior Manager in SACM?

Yes

No 1

2

If yes, on what basis? (Circle all appropriate answer)

Disability 1 Race 2 Gender 3 Religion 4 Ethnicity 5

20 In practice, what are three most important factors for promotion in SACM? (Mark the three best answers 1=most important, 2=second most important)

Advancing Transformation Affirmative Action Innovative Management Having friends in high positions Making no mistakes

5

SECTION FOUR: PERCEPTIONS ON SACM

I would like to ask you some questions on how you perceive SACM more generally.

21 Which of the following statements do you think best describe management style in SACM?

Senior managers make decisions and then inform their subordinates.

1

Senior managers consult their subordinates before making decisions.

2

Senior managers involve their subordinate in decision-making. 3

22 what is your response to the following statements about corruption in SACM

Strongly agree

Agree Strongly disagree

Corruption is mostly inherited from the previous regime

1 2 3

SACM takes effective steps to end corruption

1 2 3

Comtpt officials are dealt with accordingly

1 2 3

Corruption is not prevalent in SACM.

1 2 3

24 Which of the following statements best describe what is currently happening in SACM?

Strongly Agree Disagree Policy on Affirmative Action has been well communicated to the subordinates

1 2

There is no racial discrimination 1 2 There is no gender representivity 1 2

25 State the actual number of disciplinary actions taken against employees per month

6

ANNEURE B

QUESTIONNNAIRE FOR JUNIOR STAFF MEMBERS: EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MANAGEMENT AUDIT IN KUTAMA SINTHUMULE PRIVATE PRISON

This questionnaire is part of an independent research project. Please be assured that yours answers will remain anonymous. No names, or other ways of identifying individual respondents will be used in any version of the results of this audit. No one other than the researcher will have access to your questionnaire. After completing the questionnaire please return it to the researcher personally.

SECTION ONE: DEMOGRAPHICS

I would like to begin a few demographic details.

1

Please fill in the following information about yourself.

Race

African Coloured Indian White 1 2 3 4

Gender

Male

Female 1

2

2 Age

3 Education

Highest qualification 1 Name of institution 2 Year of completion 3 Course of study 4

3 Did you have any formal experience of being employed prior to your appointment at Kutama Sinthumule?

'Yes

No 1

2

1

4 If yes, please specify

Job title 1 Name of institution 2 Years of service 3

5 What is your current position?

Custodial official 1 Psychologist 2 Social worker 3 Educational programmer 4 Unit manager 5 Health worker 6

6 Are you an active member of a political organisation, trade union or community organization?

Yes No Name of institution Political organisation Trade union Community organisation Non-governmental organisation

SECTION TWO HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

7 How would you rank the following attributes of human resource management in your company?

Excellent Good Adequate Poor Employees are correctly placed in their positions

1 2 3 4

Appraisal process is accurately assessing performance

1 2 3 4

8 How often does the process take place at Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison? Circle the correct answer.

Always Often Never Performance is driven by rewards. Training and career planning drive

2

performance Performance appraisal provides an objective overview of my performance and performance of my colleagues Performance appraisal helps to identify my training needs Performance appraisal assists in my career development and planning. Results of my assessment are fair and objective. Restructuring is not used as a disciplinary process

9 How would you rate the situations in your company? Circle the correct answer.

Excellent Good Average Poor Our human resource policies are consistent and fair. My salary is sufficient to maintain my family. Our selection panel is doing a fine job.

10 Do you consider yourself to be adequately trained for answer only

your job? Circle the best

Yes No Partially 1 2 3

11 Which was the most important factor that enabled you to adapt to your current job?

Learning from my mistakes 1 Studying the rules and regulations 2 My colleagues shared with me important information during working hours

3

Brainstorming with my peers after hours 4 Formal orientation and induction 5 Other (please specify) 6

12 Have you personally experienced any incident of overt discrimination in SACM?

Yes

No 1

2

13 If yes, on what basis? Circle all appropriate answers.

3

Disability 1 Race 2 Gender 3 Religion Ethnicity 5 Other (specify) 6

14 What are the three most important factors for promotion in your company? (Mark the three best answers. 1=most important, 2=second most important

Advancing transformation Affirmative Action Innovative management Nepotism Performing your job to your supervisor's satisfaction

SECTION THREE: LABOUR RELATIONS MANAGEMENT

I would like to ask you questions that will portray the scenario of labour relations in your company

15 How satisfied are you with the following?

Very satisfied

Satisfied Unsatisfied

The way in which employees resign from the service.

1 .

2 3

The manner in which management involves staff members in decision-making.

1 2 3

The way in which grievances are handled. 1 2 3 The manner in which disciplinary process is applied.

1 2 3

The impact of work council on management is positive or negative.

1 2 3

Contribution of work council to bilateral meetings is very minimal.

1 2 3

. No recognised trade union operates your in private prison

1 2 3

The ways in benefits are distributed 1 2 3

4

16 Are you satisfied with the following? Circle the correct answer

Yes

No 1

2

17 Are you allowed freedom of association?

Yes

No 1

2

18 Is there any dispute resolution mechanism?

Yes

No 1

2

19 If yes, what type of dispute resolution mechanism, please specify?

20 Do these policies exist in your company?

Yes No Gender Equity 1 2 Affirmative Action 1 2 Employee Assistance Programme

1 2

1 2

SECTION FOUR: PERCEPTIONS ON SACM

I would like to ask you some questions on how you perceive the employment relations management audit in Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison.

21 Which of the following do you think about best describe the management style in Kutama Sinthumule Private Prison?

Senior managers make decisions and then inform their subordinates

1

Senior managers consult you before making decisions 2

5

Senior managers share decisions taken with their subordinates 3

22 What are your responses to the following statements about working conditions in a private prison?

Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree I do not feel free to talk in meetings in the presence of my seniors

1 2 3 4

I have important role to play in making key decisions in company

1 2 3 4

I do not feel free to challenge my senior's views

1 2 3 4

I accomplished worthwhile things but overall the job is pointless.

1 2 3 4

My salary package is equivalent to the job I do.

1 2 3 4

Racial differences affect effective functioning in my section

1 2 3 4

If I am offered a lucrative package elsewhere I will go for the offer.

1 2 3 4

23 What is your response to the following statements about corruption in SACM?

Strongly agree 1

Agree 2

Disagree 3

Strongly disagree 4 Corrupt officials are

dealt with accordingly. Corruption is not common in SACM.

1 2 3 4

Ex-members of DCS adapted quickly to the changes in SACM.

1 2 3 4

Senior officials of DCS are given preferential treatment regarding

1 2 3 4

6

high positions. Former DCS employees wield/hold too much power

1 2 3 4

24 How should conditions of service in SACM be determined?

By central agreement 1

By agreement in a management bargaining council

2

On individual basis 3

7

UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG UNIVERSITEIT VAN JOHANNESBURG

AUCKLAND PARK KINGSWAY CAMPUS / KAMPUS POSBUS 524 BOX 524

AUCKLAND PARK 2006

Tel: 011 559-2165

"Ii=4)914,3 4-WAV33 kz.s... a.2..4.1

\ : V ILL . ri.. S nt — - - 0 F - - --- -

j) CO flA,\Jr N , :S3 L) R

This item must be returned on or before the last date stamped. A renewal for a further period may be granted provided the book is not in demand. Fines are charged on overdue items.