empowering practitioners through reflection: the key to successful professional development...
TRANSCRIPT
Empowering practitioners
through reflection:
the key to successful professional development
Associate Professor Jenny Sim
Programme Director Medical Imaging
School of Medical Sciences
• Reflection?
• Research study: Reflection through the voices of MRTs
• Principles of successful CPD:
• Structured reflective process
• Kirkpatrick Evaluation model
• Holistic CPD model
• CPD and Research
Session outline
• Conscientious and rational thought process
• Intentional, goal focussed
Reflection?
• Link between different learning experiences
• Make sense of our learning and experiences in the workplace
• Identify our strengths and weaknesses
• Improve our clinical practice
Sugerman, D. A., Doherty, K. L., Garvey, D. E., & Gass, M. A. (2000). Reflective Learning: Theory and Practice. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.National Rural and Remote Support Service (2014). Reflective Practice. Retrieved from: http://www.sarrahtraining.com.au/site/index.cfm?display=143715
Reflection
• key skill, basis effective healthcare practitioner (National Rural and
Remote Support Service, 2014; Young, 2002)
Young, M. (2002). Using reflective practice in the podiatry curriculum. In S. Tate & M. Sills (Eds.), The development of critical reflection in the health professions (pp. 18-23). Bristol, United Kingdom: University of LutonNational Rural and Remote Support Service (2014). Reflective Practice. Retrieved from: http://www.sarrahtraining.com.au/site/index.cfm?display=143715.
• “Engaging in reflective practice will help you grow as a clinician and develop your clinical reason.”
National Rural and Remote Support Service, 2014. Reflective Practice, p.1
Reflection modelReflective process Criteria
Returning to experience Description of experience & events
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (pp. 18-40). London: Kogan Page.
Reflection modelReflective process Criteria
Returning to experience Description of experience & events
Attending to feelings
Positive feelings
Negative feelings
Being aware of one’s feeling
advance learning
Impede learning
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (pp. 18-40). London: Kogan Page.
Reflection modelReflective process Criteria
Returning to experience Description of experience & events
Attending to feelings
Positive feelings
Negative feelings
Being aware of one’s feeling
advance learning
Impede learning
AssociationRelating of new data to pre-existing knowledge, feelings or attitudesConsideration of multiple perspectives
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (pp. 18-40). London: Kogan Page.
Reflection modelReflective process Criteria
Returning to experience Description of experience & events
Attending to feelings
Positive feelings
Negative feelings
Being aware of one’s feeling
advance learning
Impede learning
AssociationRelating of new data to pre-existing knowledge, feelings or attitudesConsideration of multiple perspectives
Integration Synthesising old & new knowledge to establish new insights
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (pp. 18-40). London: Kogan Page.
Reflection modelReflective process Criteria
Returning to experience Description of experience & events
Attending to feelings
Positive feelings
Negative feelings
Being aware of one’s feeling
advance learning
Impede learning
AssociationRelating of new data to pre-existing knowledge, feelings or attitudesConsideration of multiple perspectives
Integration Synthesising old & new knowledge to establish new insights
Validation Testing & verifying the proposed synthesis for consistency
Appropriation Internalising knowledge into one’s own
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (pp. 18-40). London: Kogan Page.
Reflection modelReflective process Criteria
Returning to experience Description of experience & events
Attending to feelings
Positive feelings
Negative feelings
Being aware of one’s feeling
advance learning
Impede learning
AssociationRelating of new data to pre-existing knowledge, feelings or attitudesConsideration of multiple perspectives
Integration Synthesising old & new knowledge to establish new insights
Validation Testing & verifying the proposed synthesis for consistency
Appropriation Internalising knowledge into one’s own
Outcomes of reflection
Action
Affective
Perspectives
New way of doing things, development of new skills, commitment to action, readiness for application
Changes in emotional state, attitudes
Transformation in perspectives, changes in values
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning (pp. 18-40). London: Kogan Page.
.
Sim, J. (2006). Continuing professional development in Medical Radiation Science: journey towards reflective practice in cyberspace. Retrieved from: http://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:6199
Developing reflective practice online
I have noticed a change in Participant
10’s enthusiasm, towards RT planning.
She is keen to learn, almost demands
to learn new methods. This contrasts
the way she was previously used to be a
bit more apprehensive when
challenged.
Radiation Therapy In-charge[Commenting on Participant 10: 2nd Pilot]
Distinct behavioural change
new
old
Impact at workplace
Positive impact on junior staff & students
Impact at workplace
Participant 10 is a good role model in the
workplace. Her positive attitude and
willingness to learn of late has had a positive
impact. Especially on the more junior staff
and students.
Radiation Therapy In-charge
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLXE_OiKb5OPpPjMjeTDfWKh0HrdDE61Tya4FeWuzaN7YyLu4HnQ
Shared her learning at the workplace
• Shared literature• Shared her learning• Stimulated
discussions
Action: ongoing proposal
Snapshot of one Participant
My
proposal EBP
My responsibility to advance practice
Perspective transformation
Input please?
My ideas
Reflected on her approaches towards information seeking
I feel that I am actually quite a different person now in the
way I look at my role in our dept and what I want to do
and to get involved in. Before doing this course I was quite
content to let the younger ones in the dept investigate all the
new equipment and technologies, but now I want to be
more involved and better informed. So I feel I have
benefited enormously from this.
2nd Pilot: Participant 11 [Learning portfolio: 24th November 2004]
Transformation
Personal & professional development
I feel that I am actually quite a different person now in the
way I look at my role in our dept and what I want to do and to
get involved in. Before doing this course I was quite content
to let the younger ones in the dept investigate all the new
equipment and technologies, but now I want to be more
involved and better informed. So I feel I have benefited
enormously from this. I only hope that I can keep the
enthusiasm and the momentum going. [My senior] is
helping this, having booked me to give a presentation on my
topic in January.2nd Pilot: Participant 11
[Learning portfolio: 24th November 2004]
Workplace support
Transformation
Personal & professional development
CPD: Kirpatrick’s Evaluation modelLevel Details
1: Reaction Affective aspects
2: Learning Type and extent of learning
3: Application Changes as a result of learning
• Behaviour
• Attitude
• Perspective
4: Result Impact on workplace
5: Return on investment
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
I feel that I am actually quite a different person now in the
way I look at my role in our dept and what I want to do and to
get involved in. Before doing this course I was quite content
to let the younger ones in the dept investigate all the new
equipment and technologies, but now I want to be more
involved and better informed. So I feel I have benefited
enormously from this. I only hope that I can keep the
enthusiasm and the momentum going. [My senior] is
helping this, having booked me to give a presentation on
my topic in January.2nd Pilot: Participant 11
[Learning portfolio: 24th November 2004]
Workplace support
Transformation
Personal & professional development
CPD: Holistic CPD model
Identify factors that contribute to success of FMC CPD program
Develop holistic CPD model for use across professional settings
Approved by: RMIT HREC Ethics: ASETAPP 11-09SIM
Flinders Clinical Research Ethics Committee
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ1Qb5KKKq0nnFnu4CG640y1bZeM1TrHe_c391k4SQLVvS9Hsth
Identify factors that contribute to success of FMC CPD program
CPD: Holistic CPD model
???
http://blog.ubiq.co/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ranking.jpg
Reflecting on your practice Adopting EBP
Conference presentationJournal publicationHDR research
Validating the research of others
CPD & ResearchResearch is a continuum
http://growthchampions.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/future-challenges-940x265.jpg
Looking forward…
Where am I?
“I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do
something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do
something I can do." Edward Everett Hale