empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

25
MINI HYBRID SYSTEMS MH8 Kits Installed Miles and MPG Reported Excerpt of Q1 2010 EMP Report Tasks from contract paragraph C.5.2, C.5.3, C.5.4, C.5.5

Upload: marcus

Post on 12-Jul-2015

1.332 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

MINI HYBRID SYSTEMS MH8 Kits Installed

Miles and MPG Reported

Excerpt of Q1 2010 EMP Report

Tasks from contract paragraph C.5.2, C.5.3, C.5.4, C.5.5

Page 2: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Transit Bus Total Miles Reported

Contract Paragraph C.5.4, C.5.5

Transits Engine

Miles Reported

Since Total Miles

Fuel Economy

MPGAnn Arbor Transportation Authority (MI) DDC50 (Gillig) September-08 30,037

BC Transit New Flyer July-09

Broward County Transit – Florida ISL 280 (Nabi) September-08 201,078

CATA - Lansing, MI Detroit Diesel S40 (2003 New Flyer) July-07 637,378

CATA - Lansing, MI Detroit Diesel S50 (2001 New Flyer) July-07 172,374

CATA - Lansing, MI Cummins ISL (2005 New Flyer) January-07 495,412

CATA - Lansing, MI CAT C9 (2005 New Flyer) (60') January-08 158,620

Chapel Hill, NC Gillig July-09 5,050

Interurban Transit Partnership - Grand Rapids, MI Gillig-ISL 280 May-09 77,861

Jacksonville Transit – FL Gillig June-09 4,260

King County Metro - Seattle, WA CAT C9 (New Flyer) September-07 192,410

Liberty Lines – Yonkers, NY DDC S60 (Neoplan)

Lynx – Orlando FL Cummins ISL (Gillig) January-09 39,063

MARTA - Atlanta, GA DDC Series 50 (Orion VII) March-09 990,348

MBTA - Boston, MA ISL CNG (NABI) December-07 102,322

MBTA - Boston, MA DDC Series 60 (Neoplan 60’) January-09 21,579

Metro Transit – St. Paul MN ISL 280D Gillig (3) June-09 32,945

Miami -Dade Transit- FL 8.5 L DDC 50 (NABI) July-07 384,747

MTA – Baltimore, MD Cummins ISL 330 (New Flyer)

NYCT 40' (New York, NY) Detroit Diesel S50 (1999 New Flyer) November-07 247,632NYCT Articulated Detroit Diesel S50 (New Flyer) April-08 54,893Oahu Transit – Ohau Hawaii Cummins ISL (Gillig) January-09 31,211Oahu Transit – Ohau Hawaii Cummins ISL (New Flyer) January-09 30,680Omnitrans - San Bernardino, CA John Deere 2005 (New Flyer) January-07 142,483Palm Trans – West Palm Beach FL Cummins ISM (Gillig) January-09 285,476RTA, Riverside, CA DDC 50 CNG (NABI) November-07 98,899Trimet - Portland, OR Cummins 8.3L ISL (New Flyer) October-06 662,041Valley Metro - Mesa, AZ C Gas Plus LNG April-09 147,102WMATA- Washington, DC C Gas Plus LNG (New Flyer) July-09 249,305San Antonio – TX Cummins ISL 280 (NABI) March-09Sun Metro – El Paso, TX 2008 ISLG (2004 New Flyer) Total Current Reported 5,495,206

Page 3: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Contract Task C.5.5

������������������

������

MBTA (Boston) Fuel Economy Results

Average improvement 21%

MBTA - 60' Neoplan

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G EMPBaseline

Page 4: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

�������� ���������� ��

Riverside Transit Fuel Economy Results

Average improvement 8%

Riverside Transit

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G EMPBaseline

Contract Task C.5.5

Page 5: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Broward County Transit

Average improvement 25%

Broward Cty Transit

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G EMPBaseline

Contract Task C.5.5

Page 6: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Palm Trans, West Palm Beach FL

Average improvement 4%

Palm Tran

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G EMPBaseline

Contract Task C.5.5

Page 7: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Ann Arbor Transportation AuthorityAnn Arbor

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G

EMP

Contract Task C.5.5

Page 8: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Oahu Transit – New FlyerOahu New Flyer

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G EMPBaseline

Average improvement 10%Contract Task C.5.5

Page 9: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Oahu Transit – Gillig

Average improvement 7%

Oahu Gillig Phantom

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G EMPBaseline

Contract Task C.5.5

Page 10: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Lynx – Orlando FL

Average improvement -4%

LYNX (Orlando)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09

Month

MP

G EMPBaseline

Contract Task C.5.5

Page 11: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Portland Buses - Fuel Economy Results��������������������������������

����������

����������

����������

Average improvement 5%

TriMet (Portland)

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

Jan

-07

Mar

-07

May

-07

Jul-0

7

Se

p-07

No

v-07

Jan

-08

Mar

-08

May

-08

Jul-0

8

Se

p-08

No

v-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 12: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

San Bernardino, California Fuel Economy����������������������������

��������

Average improvement 7%

OmniTrans (San Bernardino CA)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Jan-08

Feb-08

Mar-08

Apr-08

May-08

Jun-08

Jul-08

Aug-08

Sep-08

Oct-08

Nov-08

Dec-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 13: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Lansing Bus – Fuel Economy Results������������������������

Average improvement 7%

CATA (Lansing) ISL

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

Jan-0

7Mar-0

7May

-07

Jul-0

7Sep

-07

Nov-0

7Ja

n-08

Mar-08

May

-08

Jul-0

8Sep-

08Nov

-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 14: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Lansing Bus – Fuel Economy Results����������������������������

��������������

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

All Series 40 buses converted

Average improvement 9%

CATA (Lansing) DD S40

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5Ju

l-07

Au

g-07

Sep

-07

Oct

-07

Nov

-07

Dec

-07

Jan-

08

Feb

-08

Mar

-08

Ap

r-08

May

-08

Jun-

08

Jul-

08

Aug

-08

Se

p-08

Oct

-08

Nov

-08

Dec

-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet data

Page 15: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Lansing Bus – Fuel Economy Results������������������������������

��������������

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

Average improvement 5%

CATA (Lansing) DD S50

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Jul-0

7Aug-

07Sep-

07Oct-

07Nov-0

7Dec-0

7Ja

n-08

Feb-0

8Mar

-08

Apr-0

8May

-08

Jun-

08Ju

l-08

Aug-08

Sep-0

8Oct-

08Nov-0

8Dec

-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 16: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Lansing Bus – Fuel Economy Results���������� ����������� �

����������� ������������ �!!

"����"����

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

CATA (Lansing) CAT C9

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Jan-08

Feb-08

Mar-08

Apr-08

May-08

Jun-08

Jul-08

Aug-08

Sep-08

Oct-08

Nov-08

Dec-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 17: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Atlanta Fuel Economy Results��������������#���������������#�

�� #�����#��� #�����#�

�� ��#��� ��� ��#��� �

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

EMP – 5 buses

Baseline – 4 busesAverage improvement 2%

MARTA (Atlanta GA)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Mar-07

May-0

7

Jul-0

7Sep

-07

Nov-07

Jan-

08Mar-0

8May-0

8

Jul-0

8Sep

-08

Nov-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Changed Data report from Driving MPG to Trip

MPG

Page 18: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

$%���&�����������$%���&�����������

�$'�$'

Bus #873, *890, #980, Bus #873, *890, #980, #986#986

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

New York City Fuel Economy Results

NYCT (New York)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08

MP

G

EMP 40' Fleet 40' EMP 60' Fleet 60'

40’ bus Average improvement 3%

Page 19: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Mesa Fuel Economy Results(�))�*������������(�))�*������������

����� ���#�� ��#������ ���#�� ��#�

� � ����+�� ���� � ����+�� ���

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

Average improvement 6%

Valley Metro (Mesa)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Jul-0

7Aug

-07

Sep-0

7Oct-

07Nov

-07

Dec-07

Jan-

08Feb-

08Mar-0

8Apr-0

8M

ay-0

8Ju

n-08

Jul-0

8Aug-

08Sep-

08Oct-

08Nov

-08

Dec-0

8

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Data submitted was quarterly

summary

Page 20: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

King County (Seattle) Fuel Economy Results

,���������*�������,���������*�������

��������#���#���������#���#�

� �� �

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

Average improvement 4%

King County Metro (Seattle)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5O

ct-0

7

Nov

-07

Dec

-07

Jan-

08

Fe

b-08

Mar

-08

Apr

-08

Ma

y-08

Jun

-08

Jul-

08

Aug

-08

Se

p-08

Oct

-08

Nov

-08

Dec

-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 21: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Washington DC Fuel Economy Results

-��������� #�-��������� #�

���� #������#����� #������#�

�����#����������#�����

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

Average improvement 8%

WMATA (Washington DC)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 22: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

����������..&�+�����&�+�����

����

�� ��

�� ��� �Miami-Dade Fuel Economy Results

Average improvement 5%

Miami Dade (Florida)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Oct-07

Nov-07

Dec-07

Jan-08

Feb-08

Mar-08

Apr-08

May-08

Jun-08

Jul-08

Aug-08

Sep-08

Oct-08

Nov-08

Dec-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 23: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

������������������

����������

����������

��� ���� �MBTA (Boston) Fuel Economy Results

Average improvement 10%

MBTA (Boston)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Page 24: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5

�������� ���������� ��

Riverside Transit Fuel Economy ResultsRiverside Transit (Riverside CA)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Nov-07

Dec-07

Jan-08

Feb-08

Mar-08

Apr-08

May-08

Jun-08

Jul-08

Aug-08

Sep-08

Oct-08

Nov-08

Dec-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

Average improvement 5%

Page 25: Empq1 10 fuel economy graphs

Interurban Transit Grand Rapids, MI

Average improvement 8%

Interurban Transit (Grand Rapids)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08

MP

G

EMP Fleet

�/����0�+��������/����0�+�������

Contract Task C.3.2 & C.6.5