ems llsa review 2018€¦ · • mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10%...

75
EMS LLSA Review 2018 Jeff Jarvis, MD, EMT-P, FAEMS @DrJeffJarvis Taylor Ratcliff, MD, EMT-P, FAEMS @DrRatEMTP “We make eating your veggies less painful” #TxNAEMSP19

Upload: others

Post on 01-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

EMS LLSA Review2018

Jeff Jarvis, MD, EMT-P, FAEMS @DrJeffJarvis

Taylor Ratcliff, MD, EMT-P, FAEMS @DrRatEMTP

“We make eating your

veggies less painful”

#TxNAEMSP19

Page 2: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Safety and Appropriateness of Tourniquets in 105 Civilians

Scerbo MH, Mumm JP, Gates K et al. Safety and

Appropriateness of Tourniquets in 105 Civilians. Prehosp

Emerg Care. 2016; 20: 712-722.

JLJ

Page 3: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Scerbo MH, Mumm JP, Gates K et al. Safety and Appropriateness of Tourniquets

in 105 Civilians. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016; 20: 712-722.\\

• Trauma leading cause of death < 46• Majority of preventable deaths from hemorrhage• >1/3 from extremity bleeds• No clear civilian guidelines on TQ use (at time)

Page 4: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Scerbo MH, Mumm JP, Gates K et al. Safety and Appropriateness of Tourniquets

in 105 Civilians. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016; 20: 712-722.\\

What is the most common cause of preventable deaths in civilian trauma patients?

A) Aortic tearB) Chest injuriesC) External hemorrhageD) Head injury

Page 5: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Scerbo MH, Mumm JP, Gates K et al. Safety and Appropriateness of Tourniquets

in 105 Civilians. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016; 20: 712-722.\\

• Single center chart review (EMS & Trauma Registry)• Oct ‘08 to May ‘13• All patients with EMS or ED TQ applied• Categorized as ”Indicated” or “Not Indicated”• Described patients• Complications: Potential and Adjudicated

Page 6: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Scerbo MH, Mumm JP, Gates K et al. Safety and Appropriateness of Tourniquets

in 105 Civilians. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016; 20: 712-722.\\

105 Total Patients

• Indicated

• 94 (90%)

• 48% Removed in ED

• Penetrating > Blunt

• Not Indicated

• 11 (10%)

• 100% removed in ED

• Blunt > Penetrating

• No complications due to TQ use

• Radial a. most common source (12%)

• Brachial and Femoral a. (10%)

Page 7: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Scerbo MH, Mumm JP, Gates K et al. Safety and Appropriateness of Tourniquets

in 105 Civilians. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016; 20: 712-722.\\

In a tactical situation, a 35-year-old man sustains a through-and-through gunshot wound to his thigh. Both wounds are bleeding and his thigh is swelling. VS are 90/60, P120, R 24. What is the most appropriate next step?

A. Apply a hemostatic dressingB. Apply a tourniquetC. Evacuate to cold zoneD. IV fluid bolus

Page 8: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Clemency BM, Bart JA, Malhotra, Klun, Campanella,

Lindstrom. Prehospital Emergency Care 2016; 20:266-272

Patients Immobilized with a Long Spine Board Rarely Have Unstable Thoracolumbar Injuries.

TRat

Page 9: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Clemency BM, Bart JA, Malhotra, Klun, Campanella, Lindstrom. Prehospital

Emergency Care 2016; 20:266-272

• Goal: To determine the prevalence of unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries among patients receiving prehospital spine immobilization.

• 4 year retrospective study from Western New York.• Data reviewed for imaging at receiving ED and presence of

unstable TCL injury• Defined as “unstable” if operative repair was performed.• 5423/5593 transports linked to ED record.• Mechanism in 97.4% of patients was blunt injury.

Page 10: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Clemency BM, Bart JA, Malhotra, Klun, Campanella, Lindstrom. Prehospital

Emergency Care 2016; 20:266-272

• 4,475 (82.5%) of patients had imaging at the ED.

• Acute finding (fracture, dislocation, etc.) in 233 (4.3%).

• Surgical intervention needed in 29 patients (0.5%).

Page 11: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet

(10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization).

• Zero patients with ground level fall had unstable spinal injury.

Clemency BM, Bart JA, Malhotra, Klun, Campanella, Lindstrom. Prehospital

Emergency Care 2016; 20:266-272

Page 12: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

According to Clemency et al., what mechanism of injury resulted in the highest frequency of unstable spinal injuries?

A) Fall greater than 20 feetB) Gunshot woundC) High speed vehicle crashD) Pedestrian struck by vehicle

Clemency BM, Bart JA, Malhotra, Klun, Campanella, Lindstrom. Prehospital

Emergency Care 2016; 20:266-272

Page 13: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

A 76 year—old woman fell from a standing position at the nursing home. She suffered a forearm skin tear and a forehead contusion and laceration. Peripheral motor exam is grossly normal. Which of the following justifies an EMS decision to transport her without using a long spine board.

A) Being secured to a stretcher immobilizes the same as a spine boardB) Low incidence of unstable thoracolumbar injury after a same level fallC) Spine injury is not likely without loss of consciousnessD) There is no neurologic abnormality

Clemency BM, Bart JA, Malhotra, Klun, Campanella, Lindstrom. Prehospital

Emergency Care 2016; 20:266-272

Page 14: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Brown JB, Rosengart MR, Forsythe RM et al. Journal of

Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2016; 81: 93-100.

Not all prehospital time is equal.JLJ

Page 15: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Goal: Assess association b/w time intervals & mortality in injured adults.

• Pennsylvania Trauma Registry EMS scene transports• Included all pts with total prehosp time (TPT) > 20m• Prolonged interval = interval => 50% TPT• Modeled in-hosp mortality ~ prolonged intervals

• Controlling for typical predictors of mortality

Brown JB, Rosengart MR, Forsythe RM et al. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care

Surgery. 2016; 81: 93-100.

Page 16: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

164,471 patients

Only prolonged scene time a/w mortality in patients with:HypotensionPenetrating injuryFlail chest.

aOR 1.21 (1.02 - 1.44), p < .03

Brown JB, Rosengart MR, Forsythe RM et al. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care

Surgery. 2016; 81: 93-100.

Page 17: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

In trauma patients with a total prehospital time > 20 minutes, prolongation of which prehospital time interval leads to increased mortality?

A) Response timeB) Scene timeC) Total timeD) Transport time

Brown JB, Rosengart MR, Forsythe RM et al. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care

Surgery. 2016; 81: 93-100.

Page 18: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

In the study by Brown et al., prolonged relative scene time was a/w increased mortality, even after adjusting for intubation and extrication, in patients with which of the following conditions?

A) GCS < 14B) Pelvic fractureC) Penetrating traumaD) Pneumothorax

Brown JB, Rosengart MR, Forsythe RM et al. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care

Surgery. 2016; 81: 93-100.

Page 19: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Improving early identification of the high-risk elderly trauma patient by emergency medical services.

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

TRat

Page 20: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Goal: To identify high-risk injured older adults according to prognosis associated with different injury types.

• Identify alternate field triage guidelines to improve detection of these patients.

• Adults > 65yo transported to an acute care facility.

• Sample patients from rural and urban areas transported to all levels of hospitals.

• Abbreviated injury scale used to create 5 categories of “serious injury” (i.e. ISS > 16, TBI, chest injury, etc.)

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

Page 21: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• 33298 patients transported by EMS:

• 80% injured by falls• 1507 (4.5%) ISS > 16; • 1599 (4.8%) w/TBI; • 1135 (3.4%) chest injury; • 521 (1.6%) A/P injury; • 9732 (29.2%) serious extremity injury.

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

Page 22: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Take away…

• Addition of injury type predictors, GCS and V/S parameters to predict “high risk” patients may result in improved sensitivity and decreased specificity of injury.

• Decreased specificity can result in over-triage as well as significantly increased costs associated with trauma care.

• The leading factor determining where these patients are transported is family preference.

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

Page 23: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

According to Newgard et al., which of the following results from the use of alternative trauma triage guidelines for the elderly?

A) Decrease in over-triage of the elderlyB) Decreased sensitivity for injury identificationC) Decreased specificity for injury identification.D) Increase in under-triage of the elderly.

Page 24: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

According to Newgard et al., what is the most common determinant of hospital destination for elderly trauma patients?

A) Hospital proximityB) On-line medical directionC) Patient/Family choiceD) Trauma destination protocol

Page 25: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

An observational study of shift length, crew familiarity, and occupational injury and illness in EMS workers

Weaver MD, Patterson PD, Fabio A, Moore CG, Freiberg MS, Songer TJ. Occup

Environ Med. 2015; 72: 798-804.

JLJ

Page 26: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• EMS is at higher risk of injury than others• Goal: association b/w shift length and injury/illness• Retrospective, multi-center study• 14 agencies, 37 stations – administrative data• OSHA reporting

• Model: OSHA injury/illness ~ shift length

Weaver MD, Patterson PD, Fabio A, Moore CG, Freiberg MS, Songer TJ. Occup

Environ Med. 2015; 72: 798-804.

Page 27: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

950 OSHA reports from 677 employees

Weaver MD, Patterson PD, Fabio A, Moore CG, Freiberg MS, Songer TJ. Occup

Environ Med. 2015; 72: 798-804.

Location of

Injury

Rate

Scene 454 (51.7%)

Ambulance

during

transport

256 (29.2%)

Receiving

facility

135 (15.4%)

EMS Station 33 (3.8%)

Total 878 (100%)

Nature of

Injury

Rate

Sprain/Strain 558 (79.2%)

Contusions &/or

Abrasions

84 (11.9%)

Concussions 21 (3.0%)

Needle Stick 15 (2.1%)

Lifting/Moving 345 (48.9%)

Neck/back 321 (45.5%)

Page 28: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

Where does an EMS provider have the highest likelihood of experiencing an injury while on the job?

A) During transportB) In headquartersC) On sceneD) Receiving hospital

Page 29: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Increasing shift length had greatest a/winjury/illness

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS,

Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

Page 30: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Newgard CD, Holmes JF, Haukoos JS, Bulger EM, et al. International Journal

of Care of the Injured 47 (2016) 19-25.

What factor in shift work scheduling has the greatest association with occupational injuries in EMS providers?

A) Consecutive shiftsB) Hours of recoveryC) Overnight shiftsD) Shift length

Page 31: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support in inter-hospital transport of critically ill children.

Schlapbach LJ, Schaefer J, Brady AM, Mayfield S, Schibler A, Intensive Care

Medicine 2014; 40: 592-599.

TRat

Page 32: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Goal: Does the implementation of a high flow nasal cannula capability in pre-hospital pediatric transfer reduce intubation rates.

• Retrospective study of children < 2yo transported by Mater Children’s transport team in Queensland, Australia.

• Evaluation of decrease in need for invasive ventilation (intubation) after implementation of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) treatment capability for respiratory distress.

• 793 children (331 pre-HFNC, 462 post-HFNC) retrieved with mean duration of 1.4 hour (205km) transport.

Schlapbach LJ, Schaefer J, Brady AM, Mayfield S, Schibler A, Intensive Care

Medicine 2014; 40: 592-599.

Page 33: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Pre-HFNC 13% of patients were intubated and 7% on NIV.

• Post-HFNC 7 % of patients were intubated and 33% transported on NIV>

HFNC associated with

“decreased invasive

airway rate”

Schlapbach LJ, Schaefer J, Brady AM,

Mayfield S, Schibler A, Intensive Care

Medicine 2014; 40: 592-599.

Page 34: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Bottom line:

• Implementing HFNC in transport of critically ill infants decreases the invasive ventilation rate, i.e. intubation.

• Compared to intubation (IV), there is a lower rate of intrinsic risk including pneumothorax, dislodgement and obstruction of the ETT including the requirement for less sedation, neuromuscular paralysis and the chance for ventilator induced lung injury.

Schlapbach LJ, Schaefer J, Brady AM, Mayfield S, Schibler A, Intensive Care

Medicine 2014; 40: 592-599.

Page 35: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

During an interfacility transport, the pediatric transport team places an 11 month-old child with bronchiolitis and respiratory distress on 2 L/kg/min of oxygen by nasal cannula. What should the team anticipate during transport as a result of this therapy as compared to treatment with intubation?

a) Cardiac arrhythmiasb) Less sedation requirementc) Pneumothorax developmentd) Worsening hypoxia

Page 36: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 11-20.

“Mr. Clean”

JLJ

Page 37: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• tPA available only < 4.5 hrs• “Issues”

• Intraarterial treatment may be option for LVO• Prospective, randomized controlled trial• 16 centers in Netherlands

Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 11-20.

Page 38: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Inclusion:Adults with proximal occlusion of anterior circulation < 6 hours of onsetNIH > 2Lesion confirmed with imagingTx initiated within 6 hours

Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 11-20.

Page 39: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Inclusion:Adults with proximal occlusion of anterior circulation < 6 hours of onsetNIH > 2Lesion confirmed with imagingTx initiated within 6 hours

Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 11-20.

Page 40: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Intervention: intraarterial therapy (thrombolysis, retrieval, or both.. dealer’s choice) + usual care

• Control: usual care

• Primary Outcome:

• Functional Independence (mRS at 90 days)

Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 11-20.

Page 41: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Outcome Intervention

(233)

Control

(267)

Adjusted OR

(95%CI)

mRS @ 90 days

(functional

independence)

3 [2, 5] 4 [3,5] 1.67

(1.21 – 2.30)

mRS 0 – 2 32.6% 19.1% 2.05

(1.36 – 3.09)

No occlusion on

repeat imaging @ 24

hrs

75.4% 32.9% 6.27

(4.03 – 9.74)

Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 11-20.

Results

Page 42: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Intra-arterial treatment within six hours of proximal intracranial arterial occlusion of the anterior circulation leads to a clinically significant increase in what outcome at three months?

A) All cause mortalityB) Functional independenceC) Recanalization scoreD) Serious adverse events

Page 43: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Variability in the treatment of prehospital hypoglycemia: a structured review of EMS protocols in the United States.

Rostykus P, Kennel J, Adair K, Fillinger M, et al. Prehospital Emergency

Care 2016; 20:524-530

TRat

Page 44: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Rostykus P, Kennel J, Adair K, Fillinger M, et al. Prehospital Emergency

Care 2016; 20:524-530

• Goal: To examine the treatment variability for pre-hospital hypoglycemia within EMS protocols in the United States.

• Protocols on www.emsprotocols.org and 50 largest populated states included.

• Comparison of glucose level for treatment an modality, i.e. D50W vs. D10 and adjustments for pediatric/neonatal dosing.

• 185 sets of protocols reviewed.

Page 45: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Rostykus P, Kennel J, Adair K, Fillinger M, et al. Prehospital Emergency

Care 2016; 20:524-530

Findings:

• D50W prevails as most common modality

• Highly variable guidance for “hypoglycemia” (30-120mg/dL)

• Pediatric dosing most commonly 0.5mg/kg and few had neonatal dosing.

Page 46: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Rostykus P, Kennel J, Adair K, Fillinger M, et al. Prehospital Emergency Care

2016; 20:524-530

Takeaways:

• Significant variation in protocols related to dextrose administration.

• Primary advantage of D10 over D50 is it can be used for all age groups

Page 47: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

According to Rostykus et al., what is the primary advantage to the administration of 10% dextrose over 50% dextrose for the prehospital treatment of hypoglycemia?

A) Can be given IO or IVB) Can be used for all age groupsC) Easier to titrate to effectD) Faster resolution of hypoglycemia

Rostykus P, Kennel J, Adair K, Fillinger M, et al. Prehospital Emergency Care

2016; 20:524-530

Page 48: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Still marked trend toward D50W administration despite risk for supraphysiologic glucose levels, infusion of hypertonic solutions at risk for tissue necrosis (“most common adverse event”) and challenges for pediatric administration.

• NASEMSO model EMS guidelines call for a blood glucose treatment level of < 60mg/dL.

Rostykus P, Kennel J, Adair K, Fillinger M, et al. Prehospital Emergency Care

2016; 20:524-530

Page 49: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

What is the most common adverse effect aswociate with adminisyration of D50 compared to lower concentrations of dextrose?

A) Cerebral edemaB) Dosing errorsC) Osmotic diuresisD) Tissue necrosis

Rostykus P, Kennel J, Adair K, Fillinger M, et al. Prehospital Emergency Care

2016; 20:524-530

Page 50: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients transported without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation: an observational cohort study

Drennan IR, Lin S, Sidalak DE, Morrison LJ. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1488-1493.

JLJ

Page 51: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Medical Futility at 1% odds of survival• Universal ToR Guideline (2009)

• Specificity 100% (transporting survivors)• PPV 100% (death)• Reduce transport rate to 37% w/o missing survivors• All of following:

• Not witnessed by EMS• No ROSC on scene (NPV 99.6% survival to hospital dc)• No AED delivered

Goal: Determine survival rates w/o ROSC by: ToR vs Transport recommendation of Universal Rule

Drennan IR, Lin S, Sidalak DE, Morrison LJ. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1488-1493.

Page 52: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Inclusion: All adult patients w/ cardiac etiology OOHCA transported to hospital without prehospital ROSC

Analysis:Compared survival rates of those meeting and not meeting transport criteria of Universal rule.

Drennan IR, Lin S, Sidalak DE, Morrison LJ. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1488-1493.

Page 53: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Lack of

ROSC, by

itself, is

not a

sufficient

ToR

criteria

Drennan IR, Lin S, Sidalak DE, Morrison LJ. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1488-1493

Page 54: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

A BLS crew arrives to find a 67 year-old man in cardiac arrest. The AED advises no shock. After several rounds of CPR, there is no pulse noted. According to the Universal Termination of Resuscitation Guidelines, what is the most appropriate next step in management?

A) Continue resuscitation for 20 minutesB) Continue until ALS arrivesC) Terminate resuscitationD) Transport to hospital

Page 55: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

EMS responds to a patient in cardiac arrest whose arrest was witnessed by bystanders. His initial rhythm is VF and a total of 3 shocks are delivered. His rhythm deteriorates to asystole and EMS is unable to obtain ROSC after 35 mninutes on scene? According to the Universal Termination of Resusciation Guidelines, what should EMS do next?

A) Ascertain wishes of the next of kinB) Continue resuscitation and transportC) Continue resuscitation for 25 more minutes on sceneD) Discontinue resuscitation now

Page 56: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Police officers can safely and effectively administer intranasal naloxone.

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

TRat

Page 57: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Goal: To describe the indications and outcomes of LE naloxone administration including the incidence of cardiac arrest, deterioration and voluntary transport to the hospital.

• 900 officers in specific area trained on administration of 2mL vial of naloxone with MAD device.

• 126 naloxone administrations recorded on department capture form and corresponding ePCR

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 58: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Top indications were unconscious/unresponsive, slow breathing, turning blue and not breathing.

• 65.1% regained consciousness, 56.3% had improved breathing, 55.1% got 2nd dose by EMS

• 96.8% of patients agreed to be transported voluntarily to the hospital

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D.

Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec 2016:20;675-

680.

Page 59: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Takeaways:

• Narcotic overdose is currently the leading cause of death in ages 25-64. Naloxone administration is a likely option to reduce the likelihood of death.

• The most common outcome of LE administration of naloxone is the patient regaining consciousness.

• EMS re-dosing of naloxone is likely and a presumed cause may be due to LE administered naloxone not having time for full effect yet.

• Cases where nothing happened, either patient was deceased, non-opiate overdose or required additional dose of naloxone.

Page 60: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

According to Fisher et al., what is the most common patient response to law enforcement administration of naloxone?

A) Combative behaviorB) Profound vomitingC) Regained consciousnessD) Resumed breathing

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 61: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

What intervention would most likely improve the outcome from the leading cause of death in persons between 25 & 64 in the US?

A) Bystander CPRB) DefibrillationC) Hemorrhage controlD) Naloxone administration

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 62: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Police administer IN naloxone to an unconscious man suspected of opioid overdose. EMS arrive 2 minutes later and find no change in his condition. What is the most likely explanation?

A) Improper administration by policeB) Naloxone effect has not yet occurredC) Presence of a concomitant intoxicantD) Subtherapeutic naloxone dose

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 63: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR

Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H et al. N Engl J Med. 2015

JLJ

Page 64: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Decreased blood flow during CPR is a/wdecreased survival.

• Standard CPR has frequent pauses for ventilations.

• Continuous compression CPR should result in more blood flow and higher survival

• Goal: compare two approaches to CPR

Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H et al. N Engl J Med. 2015

Page 65: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• Decreased blood flow during CPR is a/wdecreased survival.

• Standard CPR has frequent pauses for ventilations.

• Continuous compression CPR should result in more blood flow and higher survival

• Goal: compare two approaches to CPR

Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H et al. N Engl J Med. 2015

Page 66: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

• ROC multi-centered prospective trial• OOHCA in adults• Cluster randomized, cross-over• Exclusion: trauma, asphyxiation, bleeding• Intervention: Continuous vs Interrupted

Compressions• Outcome: Survival to hospital discharge

Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H et al. N Engl J Med. 2015

Page 67: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Nichol G, Leroux B, Wang H et al. N Engl J Med. 2015

Cont.

(12,653)

Int.

(11,058)

Diff/p

Survival to

discharge

9.0% 9.7% -0.7

(-1.5 to 0.1)

p = .07

mRS 0-3

survival

7.0% 7.7% -.6

(-1.4 to 0.1)

p = .09

Compression

fraction

0.83 0.77 p < .001

# pause > 2

sec

3.8 +-

2.6

7.0 +- 4.3 p < .001

Page 68: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

In the study by Nichol et al., what was the impact of continuous chest compressions on OOHCA as compared to interrupted chstcompressions?

A) Improved survival to dischargeB) No difference in survival to dischargeC) Increased hospital admission ratesD) No difference in hospital admission rates

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 69: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

In the ROC trial of continuous vs interrupted compressions, which of the following is an important limitation?

A) Both groups received positive pressure ventilationsB) Group cluster randomization method was usedC) Higher intubation rate in the interrupted groupD) Small difference in chest compression fraction between

groups

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 70: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Prekker ME, Delgado F, Shin J et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2016

Pediatric Intubation by Paramedics in a Large Emergency Medical Services System: Process, Challenges, and Outcomes

JLJ

Page 71: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Prekker ME, Delgado F, Shin J et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2016

• Retrospective chart review, King County, WA• 2006 – 2012• Children < 13 with attempted ETI• 299 cases in 6.3 years ( 1 ETI n 2,198 responses)• 44% for cardiac arrest• FPS 66%, Overall Success 97%

Page 72: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Prekker ME, Delgado F, Shin J et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2016

Challenges

Bodily fluids

33%

Positioning 6%

Facial/spinal trauma

5%

Obesity <1%

Complications

Mainstream bronchus

intubation

16%

Aspiration PNA 15%

Recognized tube

dislodgement

5%

Significant

bradycardia

4%

Page 73: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

According to the study by Prekker et al., what is the most frequent challenge faced by paramedics attempted pediatric intubation?

A) Body fluidsB) ObesityC) Patient positioningD) Suspected spinal trauma

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 74: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

According to the study by Prekker et al., what was the most frequent intubation complication among pediatric intubations by paramedics?

A) Decreased heart rateB) Endotracheal tube dislodgementC) Mainstem bronchus intubationD) Respiratory tract injury

Fisher R, O’Donnell D, Ray B, Rusyniak D. Prehospital Emergency Care, Nov/Dec

2016:20;675-680.

Page 75: EMS LLSA Review 2018€¦ · • Mechanism a/w most unstable spinal injury: fall > 20 feet (10% who fell from this height needed surgical stabilization). • Zero patients with ground

Jeff Jarvis@DrJeffJarvis

Taylor Ratcliff@DrRatEMTP