energise telecom & energy collaborating to power the ......2 28.02.2017 ict-based energy grid...
TRANSCRIPT
ENERGISE
Telecom & Energy Collaborating to Power the
Smart Grids for Digital Growth
Expert Group Meeting
ITU Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland, 28.02.2017
28.02.20172 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
28.02.20173 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
ENERGISE – Project Overview / Introduction
4
Framework:
CSA – Coordination and Support Action for the Horizon 2020
Call on Low Carbon Energy LCE 7 - 2014 - Distribution grid
and retail markets
General Question:
ENERGISE considers the relationship between utility owned and
operated telecommunications infrastructure and the use of
commercial services. Thus, the main question is: how will the
future ICT infrastructure for smart grid applications look like?
Timeline:
Start: 01/2015 – end: 03/2017
Project Partners:
TÜV Rheinland Consulting
WIK
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Funded by: EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology
Sustainable and Secure Society
Smart Cities and Sustainability
28.02.2017
Project outcome:
• A decision support toolkit was developed to sum up and
analyze all data and the case studies collected during the
project. It consists of 50 application cases from 16 different
countries.
New applications are increasing the
demand for communication and data
exchange in grids.
ENERGISE – Context
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
5
1. Starting Point 2. Arising Problem
Differences between sectors make
synergies hard to exploit.
3. Core Question
How can cooperation between energy
and communications sector be
achieved?
28.02.2017
ENERGISE – Objectives
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
6
4. Solution Concept
Identification of the relevant
stakeholders
Analysis of the current state of play
and assessment of
case studies and best-practices
Provide information and support the
decision making processes
Support the exchange of
hands-on-experience
28.02.2017
ENERGISE – Timeline
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
7
Establishing Contact with Stakeholders
Survey on co-operation
Case Study Collection
Tool Development
Consultation
1st Year 2nd Year
Final tool
database
28.02.2017
ENERGISE – European Coverage
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
8
Use-Case Survey Case Studies
DSO and Telco Company
DSO or Telco Company
No DSO or Telco Company
Case Study already conducted
No Case Study so far
Case Study in process
28.02.2017
28.02.20179 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
Use Case Survey Results I
Key Findings
Sector borders continue to blur
- DSOs becoming active in the
field of communication
- Telcos providing energy services
Technological issues are not the driving problem
No perceived political demand for co-operation
Organisations which don´t have any smart grid activities seem
to underestimate the importance of criticality of infrastructure
Various asymmetries between the main industrial actors
- Perception of competition
- Pace of innovation implementation
09.12.2016 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
10
There are various hurdles but also huge potential when considering
co-operation and infrastructure sharing between the different sectors
Statistics
Respondent Groups:
- DSOs
- TSOs
- Utilities
- Communications Providers
- Manufacturers, Research, Other
Number of responses: 294
Number of DSO & Telco participants: 130
Engagement in Smart Grid projects: >75%
Smart Grid project in the future: >88% (99% of DSOs)
Use Case Survey Results II
Co-Operation
Reasons
- Faster Implementation
- Synergy effects during deployment
- Synergy effects during operation
- Financial Pressure
- Increased customer access (DSOs)
- Strategic strengthening (Telcos)
Hurdles
- Unclear regulatory responsibilities
- Difficult liabilities and responsibilities
- Unclear market design
19.01.2017 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
11
Infrastructure
Sharing
- Better utilization of existing infrastructure
- Synergy effects during operation
- Synergy effects during deployment
- Financial pressure
- New revenue options
Separation
- Criticality of infrastructure
- Data security
- Clear liabilities and responsibilities
Shared infrastructure is preferred
(exception: security and system control)Cooperation is strongly preferred
28.02.201712 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
Case study example I
13
Starting point
Huge amount of outages due to weather impact etc.
Lines are mostly in wood trenches -> huge amount of outages
Current Situation:
Motivated by the need to ensure electricity supply, which is critical for a modern society as well as by investment deficit
The distribution network must be planned, built and maintained so that the failure of the network as a result of a storm or snow does not cause a power outage of more than 6 hours to customers in urban areas and more than 36 hours to those in other areas.
Set requirements for the security of supply for the transmission grid and high-voltage distribution networks. A general obligation of preparedness will also be set for grid owners in case of disturbances and emergencies.
The standard compensation payable to customers for power outages will be increased.
Legal obligation to “weather prove” the grid. Result is a huge activity to replace overhead lines with cables (approx. 200 km of trenches per month and an increased invest)
Overall 15 contracts with ICT providers to operate the grid and smart meter readout
Solution approach:
Goal is to have one provider with a turnkey solution for all communication demands.
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Percentage of the power lines located in
forests.
Crown snow-load has bent a tree onto
overhead lines.
Sources: ENERGISE; Kim Forssén, Aalto Univesity 2016 after Tapio; Kaleva.fi, 2013
28.02.2017
Case study example II
14
Today, spectrum is the key to escape the no “electricity/no telecommunications” vicious circle
Starting point:
Infrastructure for Smart Grids & mission critical services
Encountered problems:
Utilities (especially DSOs) need telecommunications services that are : Reliable, Secure, Cost effective,
Resilient
Additional requirements are added for mission critical services, e.g.: Coverage (important RTUs even in remote
areas), Latency (for safety reasons), Security (physical separation of critical data), Resilience (to escape the
vicious circle “no electricity/no telecommunications”)
Geospatial asymmetries between DSO and Telcos
Solution approach:
Operation of a private 70 MHZ radio network in addition to the mobile phones used by technicians on the field.
Today, it is the key to escape the no “electricity/no telecommunications” vicious circle
Systems suitable for Smart Grids, e.g. to include at least the following essential criteria: very high link
availability, >30km link lengths, priority access, stringent end-to-end latency requirements, coverage to remote /
unpopulated areas, licensed self-managed spectrum in a variety of bands (e.g. 400 MHz [including the FIXED /
MOBILE sub-bands that have a European Common Allocation for Mobile systems and] 1400 / 1500 MHz)
Sources: ENERGISE; ENEDIS
28.02.2017 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Case study example III
15
“Current telco services and products do not fulfil the DSO´s demand”
Starting point:
Demand for communication connections in remote areas
Encountered problems:
Service level agreements (SLA) are focused on mobile customers, not operators of critical infrastructures
- Unscheduled downtimes and service interruptions for maintenance
- Long response times, especially during non-working times
Changing coverage range from mobile cells depending on the number of connected clients
No, or not reliable, redundancy of connection lines and equipment
Missing financial incentives for “smart” investments (CAPEX favoured over OPEX)
- Additional investment in secondary equipment with different depreciation periods
- Additional training for technicians is required
“DSO as a customer not attractive enough, to justify adapted services”
Solution approach:
Implementation of communication services entirely in-house.
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
28.02.2017
28.02.201716 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
28.02.201717 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
What is the ENERGISE Toolkit?
19.01.201718 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
The purpose is to provide tangible and
practical guidance for the respective industries
for solutions regarding coordinated usage and
deployment of communication infrastructure
Case study based representation
of the existing implemented solutions
(25-30 cases)
Analysing the drivers for specific solutions
and factors that determine best practices
Comprehensive compilation of existing
and feasible solutions for cross sector
cooperation on a European scale
Five relevant fields of activity for cooperation between telecoms and utilities
Smart metering
(electricty) Network
operation
Infrastructure sharing
Joint deployment
Development ofnew productsand services
28.02.201719
Relevant fields of cooperation to cluster application cases for utilities
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
28.02.201720 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
ENERGISE – Toolkit Description
Tool Structure
All project outputs
Use cases description with additional background
information
Morphologic analysis and decision tree
Additional reports and general background
information
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
21 28.02.2017
ENERGISE – Toolkit Description
Case Database
Select an use case
By number
Or filter by country / characteristics…
Edit the selected use case
Ad a new use case
Print the selected use case
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
22 28.02.2017
ENERGISE – Toolkit Description
Case study
Country specific Factors
General information
Energy regulation
Telecommunication regulation
Smart grid and smart metering policy
Company Specific Factors
Use Case specific information
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
23 28.02.2017
ENERGISE – Toolkit Description
Use case additional information
Additional detailed information
Explanation of the chosen characteristics
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
24 28.02.2017
ENERGISE – Toolkit Description
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
25
Description of search function
Search for any specific factors / items / content
(e.g. show all application cases for “smart metering”
Link various search options
(e.g. show all application cases for “smart metering” in
countries that match certain criteria)
Analyse the relative similarity of one implemented
solution with others
28.02.2017
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
26 28.02.2017
28.02.201727 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
Toolkit – Data available per Case Study (Overview)
28
Country specific factors
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Data categories
1. General aspects
2. Country specific sector information Energy
3. Smart Meter Framework
4. Smart Grid Framework
5. Country Specific Sector Information Telco
Data sub-categories (example)
- Smart meter roll-out
- Smart meter roll-out market model
- Expected diffusion rate of smart meters by 2020 (%)
- Responsible party - implementation & ownership
- Financing of roll-out
- Share of metering points equipped with smart meters
- Metering data-model
28.02.2017
Toolkit – Data available per Case Study (Overview)
29
Company specific factors
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Data categories
1. General data
2. Company size
3. Degree of Vertical Integration (Telco)
4. Degree of Vertical Integration (energy)
5. Organizational structure
6. Market activity
Data sub-categories (example)
- Own Infrastructure (telco)
- Network Operator (telco)
- Content Services (telco)
- Retail and Distribution (telco)
28.02.2017
Toolkit – Data available per Case Study (Overview)
30
Application specific characteristics
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Data categories
1. Application types
2. Starting point
3. Decision criteria (for the selected solution)
4. Solution Description
Data sub-categories (example)
- Type of Cooperation/interaction
- Implemented solution
- Main obstacle
- Mitigation strategies
- Cooperation Addressee 1&2
- Partner within the same Company group
28.02.2017
28.02.201731 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
Results from the toolkit analysis
32
Degree of envisaged asset ownership is key for decisions
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Traditional approach:
- Own infrastructure
- Operated with own staff
Operator model:
- Own ICT-infrastructure
- Operated by 3rd party
Communication as a Service:
- No own infrastructure
- Operated by 3rd partyOperation
3rd partyown
No
ow
n
assets
Fu
ll
ow
ners
hip
As
se
t o
wn
ers
hip
Operator model
Communication as
a service
Traditional approach
N / A
28.02.2017
Results from the toolkit analysis
33
How important are utilities for telco‘s revenue? Asymmetric Valuation of Commercial Services
and strategic lock in effects affect decisions
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Strong „lock-in“ effect
„small customer“, high requirements
Failure due to communication
infrastructure or service
Loss for Telco Provider
Loss for DSO
Telecom operator 1 Telecom operator 2
Voice Voice + Data DSO
Revenues for telecoms
28.02.2017
34
Toolkit Analysis: Criteria for technology evaluation
4 3 2 1 0
Standardization Fully Good Reasonable Hardly Not
Spectrum Available high probability balanced low probability Not available
Life time > 15 years 10-15 years 7.5-10 years 5-7.5 years 5 years
Ecosystem > 10 6-10 2-5 1 0
Coverage 99-100% 90-99% 80-90% 50-80% < 50%
CAPEX Very low Low Average High Very high
OPEX Very low Low Average High Very high
Reaction time Fast Good Reasonable Slow Too Slow
Control DSO full DSO good DSO reasonable DSO hardly DSO not
Vendor Lock-in Very low Low Average High Very high
Applications > 10 6-10 2-5 1 0
Availability Excellent Good Reasonable Moderately Very bad
Scalability Excellent Good Reasonable Moderately Very bad
28.02.2017 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
35
ENERGISE – Toolkit Analysis: criteria for technology evaluation
Most relevant for critical infrastructure
4 3 2 1 0
Standardization Fully Good Reasonable Hardly Not
Spectrum Available high probability balanced low probability Not available
Life time > 15 years 10-15 years 7.5-10 years 5-7.5 years 5 years
Ecosystem > 10 6-10 2-5 1 0
Coverage 99-100% 90-99% 80-90% 50-80% < 50%
CAPEX Very low Low Average High Very high
OPEX Very low Low Average High Very high
Reaction time Fast Good Reasonable Slow Too Slow
Control DSO full DSO good DSO reasonable DSO hardly DSO not
Vendor Lock-in Very low Low Average High Very high
Applications > 10 6-10 2-5 1 0
Availability Excellent Good Reasonable Moderately Very bad
Scalability Excellent Good Reasonable Moderately Very bad
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
28.02.2017
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
36
Private MVNO
Full Public MVNO
Build and operate
own MVNO
Solution for Smart
Meter roll-out needed
Own TelCo assets
No TelCo assets
Challenge: roll out of large
volume of smart meters with
long term contract (~15 yrs)
lock in effects Low level of control on telco
solution vs. high level of control on telco solution
existing assets vs. degree of envisaged asset
ownership
Source as a
Service from
MVNE
Strategic factors &
regulatory
environment
Commercial aspects
SLAs for operation
Commercial agreements (market based)
Cost-wise thresholds to build own infrastructure
Maintenance
(operational price levels)
Toolkit Analysis: Exemplary Decision tree trees including the criteria to map all
potential options
28.02.2017
Toolkit Analysis: Morphological Analysis
28.02.2017 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
37
Statistical analysis
Morphologic AnalysisProvision of all existing
combinations of data
Analysis of most taken paths
Analysis of dependencies long the
most taken paths
28.02.201738 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Agenda
Overview ENERGISE1
General aspects1.1
Survey among Telcos & DSOs1.2
Case Study examples1.3
ENERGISE toolkit2
Overview2.1
Functions & Usability2.2
Data content overview2.3
Implemented analysis 2.4
Conclusions & outlook3
ENERGISE – Key Learnings
Blurring and merging of markets leads to significant challenges for regulation
There is an increasing interdependency between Infrastructures and the involved sectors
Rising demand for new (m2m) communications solutions
Exchange and cooperation between NRAs from both sectors is perceived as driver for more collaboration
net neutrality und data security
No clear common understanding of what is a critical application / what are the minimum communication requirements
- Which ratio of expected outside performance vs. in house supply
- Geospatial dimensions count
- 5G standards aim to include all stakeholders and requirements, but no major joint input from DSOs yet
Cooperation is hard to achieve but possible and economically viable
Growing number of examples of cooperation that originate in other fields of cross-sectoral cooperation, e.g. joint
deployment
39 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
28.02.2017
Session 3: Telecom and
Energy Operators’ view
Session 2: Telecom
Regulators Perspective
on Collaboration with
Energy Sector
Outlook to sessions
28.02.201740 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Energy Telco
NRAs
Business
actors
National
Regulatory
bodies
National
Regulatory
bodies
DSOs
Producers
Retailers
Telecoms
MNOs
Carrier
Sectors
Ac
tors
• Existing ENERGISE Focus on
mapping demand from DSOs
• E.g. Implementation of Cost
saving directive is perceived to
lack joint regulatory realm
between telco & energy NRA
• Add perspective from NRAs &
telcos
• Main obstacles on case studies
level “other sector doesn’t
understand our business”
Necessity to collaborate
Session 4: Open discus-
sion on identified issues
Session 5: ENERGISE
Toolkit – Way Forward
ENERGISE – Contact Details
Next Steps
16th – 17th March: Final ENERGISE Dissemination Workshop, Brussels
Information about the project
Webpage (www.project-energise.eu)
Project leaflet
Direct contact
19.01.2017 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
41
Opportunities€Lock inSLA
Back Up
28.02.2017 ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
42
A telecoms perspective on DSOs and vice versa
28.02.2017 Corporate Presentation43
Hurdles for cross-sectoral co-operation from a
telecoms perspective
Energy Sector Telecommunications Sector
Regulatory Driven Customer Driven
Energy Sector
Be
twe
en
se
cto
rs
Different ICT-standards per region
Within
se
cto
r
Inconsistent management of investment
plans
incentive to generate huge CAPEX to get
it covered from the grid tariffs
Clear market driven incentives for cost-
saving
security of network operation that can
only be realised in a private dedicated
ICT network
best knowledge of security issues and
secure data procession.
DSOs perspective
• No Service Level Agreement for telecommunication
solutions removes the electricity operators responsibility
for his service quality
• DSO's and TSO's need to retain control of
telecommunications networks and their uses for smart
grid/critical operational telecoms
• Public telecommunications solutions provided by
commercial operators are not appropriate for critical
applications due to lifecycle issues
• Non-critical applications are not an issue.
• SLAs are not enough. What is required: proof of no
SPOF [single point of failure] (not only when the is
service designed but during its whole life)