energy efficient node deployment for target coverage in wireless sensor network
TRANSCRIPT
Energy Efficient Node Deployment for Target Coverage in Wireless Sensor Network
Prepared By : Gaurang Rathod ME EC Gujarat Technological University Gujarat India
29 January 2015 [email protected]
Outline
Motivation Introduction Network Lifetime for Target Coverage ABC Algorithm Simulation Work References
Motivation Wireless sensor network is energy constrain
network
Energy consumption of Node[1]
1. Data transmission2. Signal processing 3. Hardware operation
Target Coverage Coverage can be classified as area coverage
and target(point) coverage[6]
(a) Area coverage and (b) Point coverage
Continue… Target Coverage can be categorized
1. Simple coverage
2. k-coverage
3. Q-coverage: Target T= {T1,T2,..,Tn} should be monitored by Q= {q1, q2,…, qn} number of nodes
Network Lifetime Network is live till all targets being sensed
by nodes otherwise network considered as dead.
Network life is defined by target sensed time duration by nodes.
Deploy nodes such a way that target sensed by maximum number of nodes, so network live long.
Node Deployment Algorithm Input: no. of nodes and no. of target
Output: optimum location of node such that maximum network life achieve with required target coverage level
Procedure1. Select random location for the given no. of target.2. Deploy nodes randomly such that each target must be
covered by minimum one node.3. Compute life time of network.4. Recomputed node position using ABC algorithm such
that network life maximum.
Network Lifetime Calculation Let sensor nodes : {s1, s2, s3,…,sm}
randomly deployed to cover the region R with n targets : {T1,T2,..,Tn}
Each node has initial energy E0 and a sensing radius sr
A sensor node is said to cover target if distance between node and target is less than radius sr
Coverage Matrix is defined as
1
0i j
i j
if S monitorsTM
otherwise
Continue…
where ei is energy consumption rate of i-node
For k-coverage, qj=k, j=1,2,…,n
0( ) , 1Lifeof node ii
Eb i m
e
1
*
minNetwork lifetime
m
i j ii
j
M b
j q
Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm[10]
The colony of artificial bees contain three group of bees
1. Employed bees2. Onlookers3. Scouts Employed bees determine a food source within
the neighborhood of the food source in their memory
Employed bees share information with onlookers within the hive and then the onlookers select one of the food sources
Continue… Onlookers select a food source within the
neighborhood of the food sources chosen by themselves
An employed bee of which the source has been abandoned becomes a scout and starts to search a new food source randomly
Continue… New search position
i=bee indexj=random selected dimension i.e. either x-yam or y-yam random selectedk=random selected bee (k never equal to i)
, , , ,( )i j i j i j k jv x x x
Experiment Work A
1. For fix number of targets and varying number of nodes
2. For different-different number of targets and nodes
3. For changing size of network
4. By varying sensing range of node
Simulation Parameters
Parameter Value
Network area 400m x 400m
500m x 500m
Node sensing range 75m
80m
Initial energy 100 J
Energy consumption rate 1 J/S
No. of target 20 to 40
No. of nodes 100 to 250
Network Lifetime for K-Coverage (Deployment using ABC Algorithm)
Network size: 500m x 500m, sensing range: 75m
Experiment Work B
Simulation Cases :
1. Node deployment with same communication interval
2. Node deployment with distinct random communication interval
3. Node deployment with distinct communication interval base on communication cost
Simulation ParametersParameter Value
Channel Type Wireless 802.15
Propagation Type Two Ray Ground
MAC protocol MAC – 802.15
Queue Type Drop tail
Antenna Omni Antenna
Number of nodes 25
Queue Length 50
Routing protocol AODV
Network area 500 m x 500 m
Packet size 200 bytes
Initial Energy 2 joules
29
Case 2: Node Deployment with Distinct Random Communication Interval
Energy is inversely proportional to square of the distance
Node far from the base station consume more energy compared to near one
By allocating different communication interval to each node helpful to make network energy consumption rate balance compared to case 1
Case 1 :Energy Left at Simulation End
Node Energy Node Energy Node Energy
0 1.5216 8 1.5206 16 1.3288
1 1.5066 9 1.5210 17 1.3287
2 1.5212 10 1.5211 18 1.5213
3 1.4236 11 1.4175 19 1.5219
4 1.5216 12 1.4927 20 1.5080
5 1.5077 13 1.5207 21 1.5215
6 1.5215 14 1.4755 22 1.5204
7 1.5218 15 1.5209 23 1.6813
Difference between highest and lowest energy =0.3526 joule
Case 2 : Energy Left at Simulation End
Node Energy Node Energy Node Energy
0 1.6736 8 1.6847 16 1.6849
1 1.6383 9 1.6450 17 1.6714
2 1.6823 10 1.6851 18 1.7172
3 1.6827 11 1.6812 19 1.6004
4 1.6968 12 1.6838 20 1.6808
5 1.6346 13 1.6857 21 1.6819
6 1.6686 14 1.6608 22 1.6600
7 1.6786 15 1.6441 23 1.6813
Difference between highest and lowest energy =0.1168 joule
Case 3 :Energy Left at Simulation End
Node Energy Node Energy Node Energy
0 1.8562 8 1.8585 16 1.8534
1 1.8582 9 1.8563 17 1.8561
2 1.8592 10 1.8588 18 1.8572
3 1.8586 11 1.8576 19 1.8586
4 1.8566 12 1.8592 20 1.8527
5 1.8455 13 1.8589 21 1.8580
6 1.8592 14 1.8424 22 1.8554
7 1.8480 15 1.8597 23 1.8505
Difference between highest and lowest energy =0.0173 joule
Conclusion Sensing range of node, size of network, number of
target, number of nodes and scheduling have significant effect on life of network which we have done analyses in the simulation by increasing no. of target and sensing area network life decrease but by increasing node’s sensing radius life increases with effective coverage level.
By using artificial bee colony algorithm for node deployment, we achieve the required target coverage level and maximize the network lifetime compared to random deployment. Node deployment by using ABC algorithm work good for simple as well as k-coverage application.
References1. I. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “A survey on
sensor networks”, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 102–114, Aug. 2002.
2. Karl, Holger and Andreas Willig, “Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks”, John Wiley & Son Ltd, 2005.
3. I. Akyildiz and M. Vuran, “Wireless Sensor Networks”, John Wiley & Son Ltd, 2010.
4. Datasheet of Mica2 mote.5. G. Anastasi, M. Conti, M. Francesco and A. Passarella, “Energy
conservation in wireless sensor networks A survey”, Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks, pp. 537-568, July 2008.
6. S. Mini, S. Udgata, and S. Sabat, “Sensor Deployment and Scheduling for Target Coverage Problem in Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE sensor journal, vol. 14, no. 3, March 2014.
Continue…7. M. Cardei and J. Wu, “Energy-efficient coverage problems in wireless ad-
hoc sensor networks”, Elsevier- Computer Communications, December 2004.
8. X. Tang and J. Xu, “Optimizing lifetime for continuous data aggregation with precision guarantees in wireless sensor networks”, IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, vol. 16, no. 4, August 2008.
9. C. Wang, J. Shih, B. Pan and T. Wu, “A network lifetime enhancement Method for sink relocation and its analysis in wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE sensors journal, vol. 14, no. 6, june 2014.
10. D. Karaboga and B. Basturk, “On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm”, Science direct-Applied Soft Computing 8, pp. 687-697, 2008.
11. Network Simulator -2 http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/doc/index.html