energy policy ukraine country report · energy policy ukraine country report fichova oryna....
TRANSCRIPT
ENERGY POLICY
UKRAINE COUNTRY REPORT
Fichova
Oryna
Ukrainian
Head of Division Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine
May, 2009 – Tokyo (Japan)
Ukraine –
country profileCapital: Kiev Other
Cities: Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk,Kharkiv, Lviv, OdesaLocation:
East Europe, bordered
by
Poland,Slovakia,
Hungary, Romania, Moldova, Russiaand
BelarusPopulation: 45.9 million Area: 603,700 sq km (233,090 sq miles) Government:
Presidential-parliamentaryIndependence:
August
24, 1991Languages: Ukrainian
(official), Russian, othersEthnic
Groups:
Ukrainians, Russians,Belarusians, Moldovans, Hungarians,Bulgarians, Jews, Poles, Crimean
Tatars
andother
groups.Main exports: Military equipment, metals,pipes, machinery, petroleum products, textiles,agricultural products
Ukraine –
economic profileGDP (2008):Total: $198 billionPer capita: $4287Growth: 6,9 %Currency: Hryvnia
(UAH)•
1 USD = 8,0 UAH•
1 EUR = 10,4 UAH•
Inflation rate –
22,3
% •
Interest rate –
12 %•
Foreign Investment Environment -
22.6%
Exports: $67 billion
(2008)Export
goods: ferrous
and
nonferrousmetals, fuel
and
petroleum products,chemicals, machinery and
transportequipment, food
productsMain
export
partners: Russia
21.3%,Turkey
7.1%, Italy
6.4% , USA
4.1%
Imports: $85.53 billion
(2008)Import
goods: energy, machinery
andequipment, chemicals Main
import
partners: Russia
28.2%,Germany
11.7%, Poland
7.6%,Turkmenistan
5.7%
Ukraine’s Energy Potential
The Unified Energy System of Ukraine is connected with 7 energy systems of the neighboring states by 75 transmission lines. The total technically feasible power transfer makes up more than
50 billions kW/year.
Burshtyn
„island”
operates synchronously
with UCTE and has the potential to
increase the energy export.
Main electricity producers are
–
14 thermal, 8 hydro
and
4 nuclear power plants with 52 mln. kW of total capacity.
Natural Uranium reserves in Ukraine allow to provide the national nuclear power needs for more than 100 years
Ukraine
possesses the significant established reserves and potential resources
Natural gas
–
900 billion m3(average annual production makes up
21 billion m3)
Oil and liquefied petroleum gas
–
140 mln. tons
(average annual volume of
production makes up
4 mln. tons)
Coal
–
the sole domestic energy source of Ukraine whose deposits can
potentially suffice to supply the national economy needs
Total volume of domestic coal reserves
–
117 billion tons
Recoverable reserves in the mines in operation
–
6,5 billion
tons, 3,5 of which
is power-generating coal1
Oil refinery plants
can refine up to 45-50 mln. tons of oil per year
Oil transportation system:
total length: 4 766,1 km
according to a single line
calculation• input system capacity from East
-
114,0 mln.
tons of oil per year
• output system capacity
(transit) -
56 mln. of tons per year
Gas transportation system of Ukraine includes:• 37,8 thousands km. of gas pipelines •
73 compressor stations, 110 compressor shops, equipped by
703 gas pumping units with 5,4 thousands MW of total capacity• above
1600 gas distribution stations
•
13 underground gas storage facilities with the total active capacity of more than 33,5 billion m3
•
input gas transportation system can maintain up to 290 billion m3, and an output system can transfer 175 billion m3 of natural gas
Volume of gas transit to the European and CIS countries makes up almost 130
billion m3 annually, more than 80 % of Russian gas is transported through the Ukrainian gas transportation system to the European consumers.
2
8,2 15,511,318,6
89,8
219,0
167,0
82,3
2008 2030
TPP and CHPP
NPP
HPP та HPSPP
Units and other sources
Structure of energy production in Ukraine, billions kW/year
Structure of energy generating capacities of Ukrainian power plants, mln. kW
TPP and CHPP30,4
57,8%
HPP and HPSPP
5,19,7%
NPP13,8
26,2%
Units and other sources
3,26,1%
52,6
mln. kW
–
total installed capacity
88,5 mln. kW
–
total installed capacity
TPP and CHPP42,2
47,6%
HPP and HPSPP
10,511,9%
NPP29,5
33,3%
Units and other sources
6,37,1%
2008 2008
2030 2030 191,7
420,1
43,0%
46,9%
52,1%
39,8%
According to the Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the period till 2030
THERMAL GENERATION
3
Installed Capacity Status at TPPTHERMAL GENERATION
4
10 000
11 000
12 000
13 000
14 000
15 000
16 000
17 000
18 000
19 000
20 000
21 000
22 000
23 00020
08
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
МВт
Наявна потужність, за умови Інерційне падіння встановленПопит на потужність
Anticipated Demand and Supply of the Thermal Generation Capacity, with the TPP Re-equipment Program being Implemented till 2020
THERMAL GENERATION
MW
Present capacity, providing the privatization of thermal generationInertial decrease of the installed capacityDemand on capacity
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
5
Plans for Reconstruction of the Thermal Power Sector of Ukraine till 2020
The Government Decree of 8 September 2004 №
648-р
„On activities in relation to reconstruction and modernization of thermal power plants and central heat power plants in the period till 2020” constitutes a plan of reconstruction and modernization of TPP and CHPP in the period till 2020 in the thermal power sector of Ukraine. According to this Decree, reconstruction of 65
units to be completed, including 46
units of NJSC “Energy Company of Ukraine”
and 8
power units to be constructed.
After the technical re-equipment of thermal power sector approximately 17 600 MW of energy equipment will be restored and constructed and the total capacity of power plants will increase by more than 3 670 MW.
2718
12598
3673034050
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
2009 р. 2009-2010 рр. 2011-2015 рр. 2016-2020 рр.
Інвестиц
ії, млн
.грн
THERMAL GENERATION
6
Reconstruction and technical re-equipment of TPP power units, with energy efficient and environmentally friendly technologies of coal combustion
being introduced
Increase of TPP
operating capacity factor
Priority construction of new TPP units in the regions heavily undersupplied with generating capacities
Introduction of modern economic coal-fired steam power units, equipped with the system of liquefaction of NOX
emissions(nitric oxide), SO2
(sulfur oxide), dust and gas-vapor CHPP with coal gasification
Maximum use of domestic coal, particularly lignite coal
True and transparent terms of privatization of thermal generation facilities on the public auction under investment commitments of
investor
THERMAL GENERATION Key Development Domains
7
Implementation of projects on reconstruction of HPP and CHPPUnit reconstruction(І
level
–
capital expenditure, 100 - 250 USD/kW ):
Zaporizhya
–
4 х
300 MW, Kryvyi
Rih
–
4 х
282 MW, Zuyivska
–
3 х
300 MW, Kurahivska – 4 х
200 MW, Lugansk
–
3 х175 MW, Starobeshiv
–
3 х
175
MW, Burshtyn
–
3 х
185 MW, Dobrotvirska
–
1 х
150 MW, Vuglegirska
–
4 х
300 MWPrydniprovska
–
2 х
275 MWZmiyivska
–
2
х
175 MW
Trypillya
–
1
х
300 MW
Cardinal reconstruction(ІІ
and
ІІІ
levels
–
capital expenditure, 300 - 650 USD/kW ):
Prydniprovska
–
2
х
150
MW, 1х
285 МВт, Burshtyn
–
3
х
195 MW, Zmiyivska
–
3
х
275 MW
, Trypillya
–
2
х
300 MW.
Intergration
of new capacities at TPP (above supercritical units
with
600 MW*-Capital expenditure
1300 -
1400 USD/kW):Dobrotvirska
TPP
–
1 unit
(on
№10,11) Kryvyi
Rih
–
2 unitsKurahivska
–
1 unitLugansk
–1 unitStarobeshiv
–
1 unitBurshtyn
–
2 unitsVuglegirska
–
on unit 7Zaporizhya
–
on unit 7Trypillya
–
1 unit
(on
unit
№5,6)Zmiyivska
–
2 unitSlovyanska
–
1 unitCBS boilers (Circulating boiling spheres)
(ІІІ
level
-capital
expenditure
600 -
900 USD/kW):
Starobeshiv
–
215 MW;Dobrotvirska
–
225 MW, Myronivska
–
140 MW, Slovyanska
–
140 MW,Lugansk
–
215 MW,Prydniprovska
–
2
х175 MWDarnytsk
CHPP
–
125 MW
Komysh-Burunska
–
125 MW
Cogeneration on CHPP
-Capital expenditure
500 -
1200 USD/kW
:Kyiv
CHPP-6 unit 3 250 MW
with
GTN-120
(gas pumping unit)Cogeneration on CHPP and gas transportation system
from
5 to
150 MWCCGT-50 on BolgradskyiCCGT-70 on
Simferopol, OdessaCCGT-120 Izmayilska
GSPP (gas steam power plant).
* -
Perspective direction of construction of TPP units worth additional consideration within Ukraine-Japan cooperation.
THERMAL GENERATION
8
Primary projects of technical reequipment
of energy generating TPP power units
Reconstruction of TPP power units permits recovery of the units’
design capacity, extension of their lifetime, reduction in fuel unit costs, and compliance with environmental norms
THERMAL GENERATION
Project Name
Implementa tion terms
Need for Funds, UAH (mln.) Funding Sources for 2009,UAH mln.
Total including 2009
Internal Borrowed Budget
Reconstruction of unit 3 of Kryvyi Rih TPS with sulfur-nitrogen purifier
2009-2011 801 256 50 206 -
Reconstruction of unit 9 of Prydniprovska TPS 2009-2011 366 130 26 104 -
Reconstruction of unit 7 of Burshtyn TPS 2007-2009 422 141 28 113 -
Technical reequipping of unit 2 of Trypillya TPS ** 2009-2012 1156 5 5 - -
Reconstruction of unit 7 of Starobeshiv TPS 2009-2011 1050 0,2 0,2 - -
3 795 532.2 109.2 423 -
9
Construction of 14 new modern power units of 600 MW.
Construction of one coal-operated power unit of 600 MW capacity is estimated at UAH 4,25 bln. (1400 c.u. /kW capacity)
Targeted Effect:
•
annual electricity production at newly constructed power units will amount to 60,0 bln
kWh/year
•
annual fuel saving resulting from commissioning of new power units will arrive at 7 mln.
tons of coal per year.
•
reduction of СО2 emissions will come to approximately 28 mln.
tons per year.
Top Priority Construction Projects of Power Units of 600 MW Capacity and Supercritical Parameters
10
The TEPCO electric utility instructed by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) performed the task titled “Preliminary JBIC’s
investigation for the
purposes of the electric power plants improvement project in Ukraine (СІ
Project)».
Recommendations:Construct a power unit of 300 MW capacity (unit 8)within the 720 MW power unit № 6;To perform reconstruction of unit 7 upon putting power unit 8 into commercial operation
Technical Re-equipping Project for Slovjanskaya
TPP
Key technical and economic parameters of the project:Original investment
USD 490 mln.Payback period
13 years
Expected Results:
•
Lifetime extension by 15 years•
Fuel saving–
Reduction of fuel consumption by 10-15% –
Reduction of energy consumption to supply in-
house needs by
2%
11
ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION LINES OF THE UNIFIED ENERGY SYSTEM OF UKRAINE
12
Electrical Transmission Lines Key Development Domains
Establishment of a systematized 330 –
750 kV electricity network
within the Unified Energy System (UES) of Ukraine to enable power
transmission from the western region into the short-supplied central
and eastern regions
Reconstruction and modernization of electrical networks and aged equipment of 220-750 kV substations
Ensuring power operation of NPPs
and HPSPP
Ensuring reliable energy supplies to discrete regions of Ukraine (Odessa, the Crimean,
the Carpathian and Southdonbass
regions)
Ensuring preconditions for parallel operation of the UES of Ukraine
and the synchronous UCTE zone.
13
1). 750 kV overhead transmission line (OTL) Rivne
NPP-
Kyivska
SS (Substation), with extension of 750 kV
Kyivska
SS and
750 kV OTL inlets.
Investment Projects underway
on Development of Ukraine’s Transmission Lines:
Estimated cost, investment sources and coverage:
Implementation Period:
UAH 500 mln.
(USD 99
mln.) –
internal funds of the SE NEC “Ukrenergo”,EUR 150 mln. -
EBRD loan, and
EUR
150
mln. - EIB.2008 –
2011
2). 750 kV
Kyivska
SS with 750-330 kV OTL inletsEstimated cost, investment sources and coverage:
Implementation Period:
For 2009
–
UAH 480 mln.
(USD 95,05mln)
incl.: -
UAH 330 mln. –
internal funds of the SE NEC “Ukrenergo”-
UAH 150 mln. –
special purpose fund of the state budget2005 –
2009
3). 330 kV OTL Adjalyk-UsatoveFor 2009: UAH 242 mln.
(USD 47,9
mln.)
–
internal funds of the SE NEC “Ukrenergo”UAH 92,6 mln.
EBRD loan.
Estimated cost, investment sources and coverage:
Implementation Period: 2008 –
2009
4). Voltage shift to
330 kV of the Simferopol-Sevastopol OTL , subject to reconstruction and extension of the “Simferopol”
and “Sevastopol”
substations
For 2009: UAH 129,8 mln.
(USD 25,7mln.
) –
internal funds of the SE NEC “Ukrenergo”
Estimated cost, investment sources and coverage:
Implementation Period: 2007 –
2009
UAH 180,2 mln. (USD 35,7 mln.)
–
IBRD loan.For
2009: USD 16,5 mln. IBRD loan.
5). 330 kV OTL Dnistr
HPSPP –
Bar
Estimated cost, investment sources and coverage:
Implementation Period: 2009 –
2010
14
Construction of 750 kV OTL
Zaporizhzhya
NPP
–
Kakhovska
SS with 750/330 kV
SS “Kakhovska”
and construction of planned 330 kV transit lines
Estimated cost, investment sources and coverage:
Implementation Period: 2009
–
2012
.
UAH 5 545 mln. (USD 1 100
mln.)*,For 2009
–
UAH 30
mln.
Internal funds of the SE NEC “Ukrenergo”There are plans for involving EBRD and EIB funds to the sum of UAH 5 500 mln. on a parity basis;
Design power output of Zaporizhzhya
NPP has been ensured.Electricity supplies to the southern regions of Ukraine have become more reliable; power uprate
by 800 MW allows for the transfer of the uprated
capacity from the UES of Ukraine to the Crimean peninsula.
Expected Project Results:
Design and cost-estimate documentation is planned to be derived in 2009
515
Nuclear Power in Ukraine
Рівненська
АЕСRivne
NPPРІВНЕRIVNE Хмельницька
АЕСKhmelnitsky NPP
Южно-Українська
АЕСSouth Ukraine NPP
Запорізька
АЕСZaporizhzhya
NPP
Дирекція
НАЕК
“ЕНЕРГОАТОМ”Main office NNEGC “ENERGOATOM”
Умовні
позначкиList of terms:
Типи
реакторівType of reactors
ВВЕР-1000WWER-1000
ВВЕР-440WWER-440
ХМЕЛЬНИЦЬКИЙKHMELNITSKY
МИКОЛАЇВMYKOLAYIV
ЗАПОРІЖЖЯZAPORIZHZHYA
КИЇВKYIV
Number of power units: 15
Electricity production at NPPs
in
2008 –
89,8 kWh
(46,9 %of total energy production
The total installed capacity of the NPPs
is 13,8
mln. kW
16
Environmental and operational safety enhancement of nuclear power plants
Lifetime extension of the operating power units by 15 years
Commissioning of
20 –
21 GW of replacement and supplementary
capacities at nuclear power plants
Attaining an 85-90% capacity factor for the power units
A 7,5 time increase of uranium mining resulting from exploration
of the Novokostyantynivka
deposits of uranium ore
Establishment of a centralized spent fuel dry storage facility for South-Ukraine, Khmelnytsky
and Rivne
nuclear power plants
Ensuring an alternative source of fresh nuclear fuel supplies
Establishment of domestic nuclear fuel production, having foreign industries involved solely at the uranium enrichment stage
Construction of a fuel assemblies manufacturing plant in the territory of Ukraine to supply the needs of nuclear power units
NUCLEAR POWER KEY DEVELOPMENT DOMAINS
17
7
Schedule of Construction and Commissioning of New and Lifetime Extension of Operating NPP Power Units
18
Design and Construction of Khmelnytsky
NPP Units 3 and 4
Design Features:
Estimated cost, investment sources and coverage :
Implementation Period:
2 power units of 1000 MW capacity each
UAH 14
900,7
mln.
(USD 2 950
mln.)
2009 –
2015
KhNPP-3 (construction status
–
75%
complete)
KhNPP-4 (construction status
–
28%
complete)
For
2009 к
–
UAH 45 mln.
Potential Project
19
Raw Material Base of Nuclear Power Engineering in UkraineUkraine:
according to the data on identified uranium resources, Ukraine ranks 1 in Europe
and 6th
in the world having 400 mln. tons in reasonable assured and inferred resources; the mineable
reserves of the biggest Novokostyantynivka
minefield
amounts to 90 mln. tons of uranium ore
has 12 proven uranium endogenetic
minefields
Is in possession of unique zirconium deposits which are the largest in Europe;
Ukrainian enterprises are actual monopolists in the field of zirconium raw material supplies to the world market
Has uranium and zirconium ore processing facilities
Has research and industrial infrastructure supported by the up-to-date technologies
to produce nuclear grade zirconium and hafnium as well as rolled
zirconium
Ukraine is the third largest –
next to the USA and France –
producer of pure
hafnium
Natural uranium deposits of Ukraine make it possible to supply the needs of the
operating nuclear power plants of Ukraine for over 100 years; should the fast breeder reactor technology be used the productive capacity of the resources will increase 60-70 times 20
Establishment of an Enterprise on the Base of Novokostyantynivka
Uranium Mine
Estimated cost, investment sources and coverage:
Implementation Period:
Expected Project Results:
UAH 8 600,0
mln. (USD 1 703 mln.)
Increase of uranium ore mining. Construction and putting into operation of the Novokostyantynivka
enterprise are the determining factor to ensure the maximum production growth and precondition development of the uranium complex.
Ensuring uranium ore mining to the total output of 2500 thousand tons per year.
2000
–
2018
21
Gas Transportation System of Ukraine
Supply to Ukraine:(billion m3)288 - projected184.3 - 2006168.9 – 2007
172172..8 8 –– 20082008
Including Transit to the European countries (billion m3)142.1 - projected113.5 - 2006112.1 – 2007117117..2 2 –– 20082008
Transit through Ukraine (billion m3)178.1 - projected128.2 - 2006115.1 – 2007119119..6 6 –– 20082008
Ivantzevychi-Dolyna
Torzhok-Dolyna
22
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TOP PRIORITY MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TOP PRIORITY PROJECTS PROJECTS
1.
Upgrading of gas-pumping units at compressor stations of the “Soyuz”
gas transmission pipeline•
Duration
5 years•
Cost
USD 662.2 M•
Pay-back period 6 years
2.
Upgrading of gad –pumping units at compressor stations of the “Urengoy
–
Pomary-Uzhgorod”
gas transmission pipeline•
Duration
6 years•
Cost
USD 569.1
M•
Pay-back period
5 years
3.
Rehabilitation of gas-measuring stations •
Duration 6 years•
Cost
USD 68.9
M•
Pay-back period 7.5 years
Rehabilitation of the Gas Transportation System of Ukraine
Required volume of investments: EUR 2
500 M
Implementing a new energy effective, resource-saving equipment would allow: 1)
retaining a leading role in in the Russian gas transit to Europe; 2)
providing for a reliable gas transportation; 3)
increasing the efficiency of gas-pumping units up to 37%; 4)
providing for annual fuel gas savings making up approximately 0.4 billion м3 for each gas transmission pipeline; 5)
reducing the operating costs; 6)
decreasing environmental pollution.
Period of Implementation: 2010 –
2014
18 23
Replacing the Aligned Blowers for Natural Gas Pumping in the Gas
Main-Pipelines with the Blowers Having Improved Performance Indicators
We suggest developing a Feasibility Study for replacement of aged and obsolete aligned blowers with the blowers having better performance at the following compressor
stations (CS):-
Berdychiv
CS;-
Krasyliv
CS;-
Ternopil
CS.At the same time, a possibility is considered for operating aligned blowers driven by electric motor and gas-turbine.
Main Technical Characteristics of CSMain Technical Characteristics of CS::
№ Indicator Berdychiv
CS Krasyliv
CS Ternopil
CS1. Type of the installed gas-pumping units ГТК-10 ГТК-10 ГТК-10
2. Rated capacity of a gas-pumping unit, MW 10.0 10.0 10.0
3. Number of gas pumping units installed at the compressor state, pcs.
6 6 6
4. Nominal efficiency of the compressor station, million m3/day
58.60 58.60 58.60
5. Input peak pressure of the compressor station, MPa 5.5 5.5 5.5
6. Maximum degree of compression at the compressor station 1.54 1.54 1.54
Future Project
24
Transfer of Gas Turbine Compressor Stations (CS) for Motor-Driven Operation ГПА
We suggest developing a Feasibility Study for transfer of gas-turbine CS for motor-driven operation of gas-pumping units.As per estimations, the following compressor stations are most suitable to rehabilitate replacing a gas-turbine drive with a motor-operated drive gas-pumping units:-
Berdychiv
CS;- Krasyliv CS;-
Ternopil
CS.
Main Technical Characteristics of CSMain Technical Characteristics of CS::
№ показник Berdychiv
CS Krasyliv
CS Ternopil
CS
1. Type of the gas-pumping units installed GТК-10 GТК-10 GТК-10
2. Rated capacity of a gas-pumping unit, MW 10.0 10.0 10.0
3. Number of gas pumping units installed at the compressor state, pcs.
6 6 6
4. Nominal efficiency of the compressor station, million m3/day
58.60 58.60 58.60
5. Input peak pressure of the compressor station, MPa 5.5 5.5 5.5
6. Maximum degree of compression at the compressor station 1.54 1.54 1.54
25
Ensuring stable and effective operation of the gas transportation system and improving its operational safety
Rehabilitation and upgrading of gas-pumping units and compressor stations of gas transit pipelines
Systematic diagnostics of gas –main pipelines
Decrease in gas transportation losses
Enhancing accuracy and reliability of measurements of gas quality and volumes
11 boundary gas measuring stations at the point of entry to the gas
transportation system of Ukraine are to be provided with instrumentation of measurement with an uncertainty below 0.4%.)
Establishing of a Metrological Center in the town of Boyarka, with technical support provided the EC
Increasing the gas volumes being transported through the territory of Ukraine
Implementation of a project on the construction completion of the “Bogorodchany-
Uzhgorod”
gas pipeline section (“Torzhok-Dolyna”
and “Ivantzevichy-Dolyna”
gas piplines)
Diversifying sources and routes of gas supplies
Participation in construction of new transit capacities for supplying gas from the Caspian region and Central Asia („NABUKKO”
gas pipeline)
OIL INDUSTRY Key Development Domains
26
Oil Transportation System of Ukraine
1
5,83,4
9,17,7
9
0123456789
10
млн
. тон
н / M
TA
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009(план)
Volumes of oil transported through the "Odessa-Brody" oil pipeline in reverse
mode/ Oil transportation volumes
ODESA-BRODY OIL PIPELINE:
Length 674 kmDiameter 1020 mmInitial Capacity 14.5 mtaMaximum Capacity 45.0 mtaExisting Pumping Station 1Planned Pumping Station 2
27
Project on the Euro-Asian Oil Transportation Corridor (EAOTC) to Allow Reliably Supplying Caspian Oil to the European Market on Mutually
Beneficial Conditions for All Participants, Suppliers and Consumers
IPLE
“Sarmatia”•
Established in July 2004 with participation of OJSV “Ukrtransnafta”
and PERN “Przyiazn”
(Poland).•
In October 2007 the partnership was extended to include: PERN “Przyjaźń”, JSC “Ukrtransnafta”, GOGC Llc, SOCAR,
AB “Klaipedos
Nafta”.•
The feasibility study for the EAOTC Project is expected to be completed In March 2009 .
Based on preliminary conclusions of the Feasibility Study for the EAOTC Project:•
The first stage envisages to transport 5 M ton with using the existing infrastructure without substantial investments;•
At the next stage the construction of the “Brody-Plotzk”
oil pipeline and other infrastructure need to be completed along the corridor
route to increase the transportation volumes up to 40 M ton. 28
OIL INDUSTRY Key Development Domains
Diversifying sources of oil supply to Ukraine
Implementing projects on oil supplies from alternative sources (Caspian region, Middle East and North Africa);
Concluding long-term contracts for extraction of oil outside Ukraine (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Libya, Egypt and others);
Upgrading and developing the oil transportation system,
Forming competitive tariffs for oil shipment, cost of services for its trans-
shipment and harbour
dues rates in the Black Sea ports;
Upgrading oil refineries, improving quality and enhancing competitiveness of the oil products produced in Ukraine
Developing the Euro-Asian Oil Transportation Corridor
Conducting negotiations with potential participants of the EAOTC
Project (oil
companies, oil traders,
owners of oil refineries,
and etc.) to address the transportation of Caspian oil with deploying the “Odessa-Brody”
oil pipeline, the
system of “Oil-trunk Pipelines “Druzhba”
and railway transport.
Implementing a project on construction of the “Brody-Plotzk”
oil pipeline after a
Feasibility Study for a project on the “Odessa-
Brody-Plozk”
oil pipeline construction is developed and approved by participants of the International Pipeline Enterprise (IPLE) “SARMATIA”, Ltd.
Establishing strategic reserves of the oil products
29
Resources of Hydrocarbons in the Ukrainian part of the Azov
and Black Sea shelf
2,280 M t of reference fuel, including:
Natural gas
–
1 933 M t of reference fuel,
Oil
–
159 M t of reference fuel,
Gas condensate
–
188 M t of reference fuel Including those located :•
in deep water –
1,003.0 M t of reference fuel, or
44%•
in shallow water
(up to 100 m) –
1,277 M t of reference fuel, or 56%
102.3 billion m3, or 7,0%
of the total resources have been already prospected;
57.2 billion m3, or
4,0%
of the total resources have been already confirmed.(All prospected and confirmed reserves are located in the shallow water).
Top Priority Project: Development of the Odessa and Bezymenniy
gas fields on the Black Sea shelf
2005 –
2039Obtaining during operation the additional gas resources amounting to 10.8 billion m3
Cost, Sources and Volume of Financing:
Implementation Period
Expected Project Results:
UAH 2.8 M
30
Hydroelectric potential of Ukrainian minor rivers
Perspective projects:
1).
Construction of small-size hydro power plants with 250 MW of total capactity
Cost, investment sources and coverage:
Approximate project cost upon the preliminary estimate makes up 300 mln. Euro
2).
Construction of cascade of the minor hydro power plants on the Tysa
river (5 MHPP)
Single capacity
10-50 MWTotal capacity up
to
220 MWApproximate project cost upon the preliminary estimate makes up 320 mln. Euro
31
Potential Development Domains for the Ukraine-
Japan Cooperation in the Energy Sector
Designing and construction of advanced power units rated 600 MW each, having supercritical parameters, based on the technology of the Japanese companies.
Establishing a joint production of boiler and turbine equipment for 600 MW power units, with deploying manufacturing capabilities of the Ukrainian enterprises and Japanese technologies.
Supply, assembly and commissioning of equipment and tools for construction of the Dnistrovska
Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Power Plant and high voltage
lines, including efforts in the framework of the projects being implemented with the International Financial Institutions’
support.
Implementing projects aimed at reducing the green house gas and hazardous material released by Ukrainian thermal power plants.
Transferring gas-pumping units for motor-driven operation at compressor plants of the SC “Ukrtransgaz”
of NJSC “Naftogaz
of Ukraine”.
Upgrading of gas-pumping units with deploying Japanese compressor equipment.
Implementing projects aimed at reducing methane releases in the gas transportation system of Ukraine, with using a system of ecological satellite surveillance, and also deploying the Kyoto Protocol’s tools.
Participation of the companies Japanese in privatization of energy companies.
Potential Areas of Future Ukraine-
Japan Cooperation in the Energy Field
32
Thank You for attention!
Fichova Oryna,Ministry of Fuel and Energy of
Ukraine