engaging in science and math practices

23
Engaging in Science and Math practices: Argumentation and Debating Presenters Jinan Karameh Shayya Rana Abulhosn Al Manar Modern School

Upload: jinan-karameh-chayya

Post on 17-Jul-2015

47 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engaging in science and math practices

Engaging in Science and Math practices: Argumentation and Debating

PresentersJinan Karameh Shayya

Rana AbulhosnAl Manar Modern School

Page 2: Engaging in science and math practices

DefinitionArgumentation is a collective cognitive development process which involves: 1. using evidence to support or refute a particular claim,2. coordinating the claims with evidence to make an

argument, 3. forming a judgment of scientific knowledge claims, and4. identifying reliable and consensual scientific knowledge

Page 3: Engaging in science and math practices

DefinitionDuring the processes of scientific inquiry, scientists will make claims, based on observable evidence, and will clarify with justification of the evidence as relevant to the claims. Other scientists often make rebuttal claims, pointing to other evidence that counters the evidence for the previous claim.

Page 4: Engaging in science and math practices

Layout of Arguments

Page 5: Engaging in science and math practices

Argumentation Writing frames

C = Claim: a conclusion to be justified.

Page 6: Engaging in science and math practices

Argumentation Writing frames

D = Data: an empirical observation or a statement of "fact" that is offered as evidence for C.

Page 7: Engaging in science and math practices

Argumentation Writing frames

W = Warrant: a rule or principle that justifies the step (transition) from D to C.

Page 8: Engaging in science and math practices

Argumentation Writing frames

B = Backing: some evidence or a general reason in support of W, to be supplied if citing W is not sufficiently convincing to all those addressed.

Page 9: Engaging in science and math practices

Argumentation Writing frames

Q = Qualifier: a modality expressing the force (strength or certainty) with which C is asserted, typically formulated with a term such as "presumably," "surely," "probably," "necessarily," "in general," "chances are," or “as far as the evidence goes.”

Page 10: Engaging in science and math practices

Argumentation Writing frames

R = Rebuttal: a statement of some exceptional circumstances

that may limit or undermine the force of an argument

(specifically of Q, W and B) and thus the validity of C, typically

beginning with "unless," "except that" or "if and only if."

Page 11: Engaging in science and math practices

Evaluating Argumentation

1. Organization and Clarity:5 Viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly 4 Completely clear and orderly presentation 3 Most clear and orderly in all parts 2 Clear in some parts but not over all1 Unclear in most parts

Page 12: Engaging in science and math practices

Evaluating Argumentation

2. Use of Arguments:5 Reasons are given to support viewpoint 4 Most relevant reasons given in support3 Most reasons given: most relevant 2 Some relevant reasons given 1 Few or no relevant reasons given

Page 13: Engaging in science and math practices

Evaluating Argumentation

3. Use of Examples and Facts:5 Examples and facts are given to support reasons 4 Many relevant supporting examples and facts given 3 Many examples/facts given: most relevant 2 Some relevant examples/facts given 1 Few or no relevant supporting examples/facts

Page 14: Engaging in science and math practices

Evaluating Argumentation

4. Use of Rebuttal: 5 Arguments made by the other teams are responded to and dealt with effectively 4 Many effective counter-arguments made 3 Some effective counter-arguments made 2 Few effective counter-arguments made 1 No effective counter-arguments made

Page 15: Engaging in science and math practices

Evaluating Argumentation

5. Presentation Style:

5 Tone of voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are convincing to audience 4 All style features were used convincingly 3 All style features were used, most convincingly 2 Few style features were used convincingly 1 Few style features were used; not convincingly

Page 16: Engaging in science and math practices

Math Argumentation Sample

http://youtu.be/aUEMqlSq9zk

Page 17: Engaging in science and math practices

Science Argumentation Sample

http://youtu.be/BUOCXVP2P1w

Page 18: Engaging in science and math practices

Debate in Science Class

http://youtu.be/mY6j2rpcgJ8

Page 19: Engaging in science and math practices

Lesson Planning

Objectives:1. Correct Student’s Misconceptions2. Practice argumentation skills.3. Apply Debating.4. Reflect

Page 20: Engaging in science and math practices

Lesson Planning

Materials:● Finding common misconceptions of the

given topic● Preparing resources needed by students to

find the argumentation writing frames.

Page 21: Engaging in science and math practices

Lesson PlanningProcedure:● Ask a question that might be in a form of a probe or

cartoon concept.● Give each student the resources needed to do the

argumentation● Divide students into groups to discuss and record their

argumentation. ● Arrange the groups according to

similar answers.

Page 22: Engaging in science and math practices

Lesson Planning● Give time for each group to discuss their answer and

choose their speaker● Let the Debate start (facilitate the debate through

questions that promote more clarifications) and continue for 10 to 15 minutes

● Provide feedback for the different teams by WWW and EBI.

● Ask the students to reflect upon the experience by answering the question: “ What did I Learn?”

Page 23: Engaging in science and math practices

Thank You