engineering data transmlltal cot/67531/metadc703071/... · 1 cot 14$822 engineering data...

of A 1 COT 14$822 ENGINEERING D A T A T R A N S M l l T A L

2. To: (Receiving Organization)

D i s t r i b u t i o n

N4H4A 5 . Proj./Prog./Dept./Div.:

3. Frm: (Originating Organization)

C h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n Equip. Dev.

R.Y. Seda 6 . Cog. Engr.:

11. Receiver Remarks:

IAi

N O tern IEl mie or Description of Data

Transmined

IC) 101

N O . N O . IBI oacument/orawing NO Sheet Rev.

1 . WHC-SD-WM-DRR-057 ALL 0 F i n a l Design Report f o r Cone Penetrometer P1 a t form

4. Related EDT NO.:

N/A

N/A

N/A

200 General

N/A

N/A

7. Purchase Order NO.:

9. Equip./Component No.:

10. SystRn/Bldg./FaciLity:

12. Major Assm. Dug. NO.:

13. PermitlPermit AppLication No.:

14. Required Response Date:

::: ( H ) 1 (:r) 1 Approval Rsaron Ongt- Rscsiv- Dcrig- nator nator Trans- Oispo- Oispo-

(F)

ED-7400-172-2 (04/94) GEF097

BD-7400-172-1 107l91)

WHC-SD-WM-DRR-057, Rev. 0

Final Design Report for Cone Penetrometer Platform

R.Y. Seda WHC, Richland, WA 99352 U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-87RL10930

EDT/ECN: 140822 UC: 2070 Org Code: 75250 Charge Code: N4H4A B&R Code: EW3120074 Total Pages: 84

Key Words: Cone Penetrometer P1 atform, Final Design Report

Abstract: The final design report documents the completion of the design review meetings for acceptance o f the cone penetrometer from the vendor. All design comments have been dispositioned and closed. Open items dealt with completion o f the safety assessment, operational procedures, operational testing and readiness review.

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. t rade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otheruise, does not necessari ly c o n s t i t u t e or imply i t s endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Coverment or any agency thereof or i t s con t rac tors or subcontractors.

P r i n t e d i n the United States of America. Oocunent Control Services, P.O. Box 1970, Mailstop H6-08, Richland UA 99352, Phone (509 ) 372-2420; Fax (509 ) 376-4989.

Reference here in t o any s p e c i f i c commercial product, process, or serv ice by

To ob ta in copies of t h i s docunent, contact: UHC/BCS

STA.7 [ I 'I ''

Date Release stamp ease Approval

Approved for Public Release A-6400-073 (10/95) GEF321

WHC-SD-WM-DRR-057, Rev. 0

FINAL DESIGN REPORT

FOR

CONE PENETROMETER PLATFORM

Issued by:

R.Y. Seda

Tank Waste Remediation System Characterization Project

1 .o 2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

SCOPE . . . . .

SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GENERAL DESIGN DESCRIPTION . . , .

REVIEW DOCUMENTS . . . . . . . . .

REVIEW COMMENTS RECORDS . . . . .

CONCLUSIONS AND OPEN ITEMS . . .

DOCUMENTATION . . . . . . . , , , ,

REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . .

Appendix A: 100% Design Review .

Appendix B: 60% Design Review . .

Appendix C: 30% Design Review . .

WHC-SD-WM-DRR-057 Rev 0

Page 2 of 10

. . . 3

. . . 3

4

. . . 4

. . . 4

. . . . . . 5

. . 9

. . . . 10

. . . _ A

. . _ _ B

. . . . c

WHC-SD-WM-DRX-057 Rev 0

Page 3 of 10

1.0 SCOPE

The design review strategy for the Cone Penetrometer Program, is to utilize the independent review form of the design verification, per WHC-CM-6-1, Standard Engineering Practices (EP 4.1 Design Verification). Several design review sessions were held at approximately the 30%, 60% and 100% phases of the cone penetrometer design, to brief the independent reviewers, and to solicit their comments. A system design review will be performed once the safety assessment is complete. Attached are the meeting minutes and RCR’s from the reviews, which show the acceptability of the design from the cone penetrometer vendor (reference Purchase Requisition 357153).

The object of these reviews is to provide design verification to insure equipment function, personnel safety, and compliance with WHC-CM-6-1, Standard Engineering Practice and Performance Specification WHC-S-0241.

2.0 SUMMARY

An independent design review committee was selected in accordance with EP 4.1. A design review was performed at 30% , 60% and 100% levels. The final design review was held on June 5, 1996.

Due to schedule and budget constraints, design and fabrication were completed concurrently. The reviews were scheduled to accommodate the parallel work schedule. For example, the 30% design review, the overall system was examined with an in-depth review of the substructure which was the first item fabricated. All fabricated equipment had to be approved by WHC. The vendor design approval packages were included in the design reviews.

The final review examined the penetrometer platform design, hardware integration of the Raman spectroscopy system, and hardware and software integration of the moisture probe to the platform. The standard sensor package, bottom detection sensor, Raman probe, consoles, suppo~? trailer, guide tube, push rods, hydraulics, safety logic, operational ergonomics and all other vendor supplied equipment was included in the final review. All design comments, relating to WHC-S-0241, have been dispositioned and closed. Most open items dealt with completion of the safety assessment or the operational readiness review. The moisture probe meets the requirements in functional design criteria, WHC-- SD-WM-FDC-047, as indicated in WHC-SD-WM-ATR-145. Based on these reviews, the vendor design has been accepted.

WHC-SD-WM-DRR-05 7 Rev 0

Page 4 of 10

3 .O GENERAL DESIGN DESCRIPTION

The cone penetrometer is a hydraulically driven instrumented rod which is pushed into the waste and measures chemical and physical properties in situ. The rod is supported by a guide tube wbch provides strucNral support to the rod. The rod is assembled by screwing rod sections into a instrumented tip as the rod is pushed into the waste.

The following properties are measured:

PropertW

Yield Strength Shear Strength Compressive Strength Stratigraphy

Surface Moisture Full Moisture Content Profile Temperature Profile Water Level

Species Identification Relative Concentration

A detailed design description of the cone penetrometer platform and the moisture probe are located in WHC-SD-WM-SDD-062 and WHC-SD-WM-SDD-063.

4.0 REVIEW DOCUMENTS

Vendor (ARA) drawings were reviewed . The major assemblies examined included:

H053-1A Platform Top Assembly H000-4A Push System Assembly H052-2A Platform Subframe Assembly H043-5A Cone Assembly, 2.00 Piezo H059-3A Skid Electrical Distribution Panel H061-3A Body Van H077-6A Trailer Assembly

5.0 REVIEW COMMENTS RECORDS

The following table is a listing of reviewers for the 30 %, 60% and 100% design reviews.. All generated RCR’s were dispositioned and signed off as closed, except for sections which were left as open items. A copy of each dispositioned RCR and opened RCR are


Page 5 of 10

included as attachments of this report

Reviewer

L.S. Krogsrud D.J. Foust M.E. Nolen J.E. Kane J.K. Bajwa G.R. Bloom R.L. Hand P.W. Gibbon F.M. Jones J.H. Bussell J.M. Silko P.R. Hernandez F.A. Jensen P . R , Diechelbohrer C.G. Linschooten G.N. Boechler C.E. Hanson R.Y. Seda R.E. Raymond M.L. McElroy L.D. Draper F.G. Abatt J.P. Strehlow R.L. Butler T.R. Thomas

DlsclDllne

Safety Safety/Radiation Control Safety SafetylRadiation Control Safety Assessment Retrieval Retrieval Retrieval Electrical Equipment NEC Compliance DOE-RL DOE-RL MacTec Characterization Equipment Design Characterization Equipment Design Characterization Equipment Development Characterization Equipment Development Characterization Equipment Development Characterization Equipment

- Quality Assurance Operations Stress Analysis Stress Analysis Procurement INEL

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND OPEN ITEMS

The following open items were noted during the design review but were outside the scope of the performance specification. These items shall be addressed and closed when funds are available. When funds become available, the Safety Assessment, Operational Procedures, Operational Test Procedure and Readiness Review efforts will be initiated. The activities will close all the outstanding unclosed issues from the operations design reviews. The responsible person to close the open issues is noted in the attached table.

All open RCR items are either related to operating procedures or possible changes due to the Safety Assessment. None of the open items were related to the design adequacy of


Page 6 of 10

meeting the performance specification.

OPEN:

Final Design

Reviewer

F. Johansen

M.L. McElroy D.J. Foust C.G. Linschooten

C.G. Linschooten

C.G. Linschooten

G.R. Bloom

G.R. Bloom M.E. Nolen

~~~

G.R. Bloom J.H. Bussell

J.M. Silko M.E. Nolen

~

Description

~~ ~ ~~~

Testing of the Raman optical array for thermal stability of the optical elements at tank operating temperatures is needed.

Wood deck and rails on support trailer are a radiological control problem. The wood should be reDlaced with a non-Dorous material

Operating procedures requiring a camera to be installed in the tank, to prevent overflow at the washer station, in case of a lollypop on the penetrometer or guide tube, are needed.

Step-by-step sequencing of clamping operations procedure are needed.

The safety assessment needs to be completed as well as any modifications required by the assessment.

Operating procedures need to be completed to assure operability of the design. Procedures should include tying down the 3000 psi hydraulic line from the trailer to the platform.

Radiation design analysis needs to be completed to assure acceptable radiation protection to operators.

The guide tube shoe anchor could benefit from the addition of a second wiper, so that a wiper sandwiches the guide tube.

Responsible Person

K. Kyle

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda


Page 7 of 10

Reviewer Description Responsible Person

~

M.E. Nolen An industrial hygienist needs to examine the operation of the cone penetrometer to determine the frequency and location of atmospheric checks.

R.Y. Seda

~ ~~~

M.E. Nolen Seats need to be provided for the operators R.Y. Seda ~~ ~

Standard dosimeter will indicate a higher neutron dose than Hanford Neutron Combo dosimeters. Equipping personnel around skid with Hanford Combo Neutron dosimeters is suggested.

Need radiation monitors at washer for gamma and beta.

Administrative controls are required to keep the ingresdegress doors to control the work atmosphere and accessibility of pest.

R.Y. Seda J.H. Bussell

J.H. Bussell R.Y. Seda

M.L. McElroy R.Y. Seda

M.L. McElroy The transport and storage, both onsite and offsite, of the neutron source must be thought out completely, i.e. special handling tools, procedures, permanent storage, custodial obligations, etc.

R.Y. Seda

M.L. McElroy Dripkatch pans maybe required for leakage of hydraulic fluids on tanks that petroleum base products are not allowed.

R.Y. Seda

M.E. Nolen Hoses and cables need to be labeled. R.Y. Seda

C.G. Linschooten The drawings do not indicate the ballast filler material nor weight.

R.Y. Seda

C.G. Linschooten ~ ~

All items to be carried or picked need the weight to be indicated on the part.

Assembly and subassembly and dimensions of drawings need to be improved

R.Y. Seda

~~

C.G. Linschooten R.Y. Seda


Page 8 of 10

Reviewer

G.R. Bloom

M.E. Nolen

M.E. Nolen

F.M. Jones

F.M. Jones

C.G. Linschooten

M.L. McElroy

C.G. Linschooten

Description

The ATP needs to confirm shear strength accuracy meets specifications needs be completed before cone penetrometer delivery.

Need all specifications on the winch and trolley system. Label trolley for load allowed and load test it.

~ ~ ~ ~~

Need the height and location of the computer display monitors for ergonomic concerns.

The single line diagram need to show overload device, output protective device size, cable and connector size, cable strain relief and seismic support, grounding detail, DP main breaker and how heater, pumps and DP heater will ouerate.

Electrical distribution panel needs to identify fuses. Electrical drawings need to show 24 V and 12V power supplies.

Electrical hookups need to be compatible with new tank farm hook ups requirements

ATR, when issued, needs all sensor calibration curves.

Contractual operations need to be finalized.

Responsible Person

G.N. Boechler

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

G.N. Boechler

G.A. Barnes

60% Design

Need to plug into TCRs. R.Y. Seda


Page 9 of 10

Reviewer Description

Description

Responsible Person

Operational procedures need to be developed which include bagging and rigging procedures.

Dome loading analysis for the cone penetrometer need to be finalized..

~

QA approval is needed for Raman spectroscopy neutral network.

Responsible Person

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

R.Y. Seda

Operational procedures are needed. I L.S. Krogsrud l 1 I P.R. Hernandez I R.Y. Seda

J.K. Bajwa Shielding of the hands during installation needs to be investigated. l 2 I J.E. Kane I R.Y. Seda

C.G. Linschooten Use of anti spark materials needs to be 1 3 I investigated.

R.Y. Seda I 14 1 R.L. Hand I Operational contract issues need to be resolved. 1 G.A. Barnes 1

7.0 DOCUMENTATION

The following items are provided as attachments to this report:

1. RCRcopies 2. Meeting Minutes

Review copies of drawings provided to the review member are available in the vendor files. All released documentation referenced in the report will be available using vendor files or controlled document numbers located in the text where the document is cited.


Page 10 of 10

8.0 REFERENCE

WHC-S-0241, Rev 2, “Specification for Enhanced Cone Penetrometer System”

WHC-SD-WM-SDD-062, Rev 0, “Cone Penetrometer Moisture Probe System Design Description”

WHC-SD-WM-SDD-063, Rev 0, “System Design Description Cone Penetrometer System”

WHC-SD-WM-ATR-145, Rev 0, “Cone Penetrometer Moisture Probe Acceptance Test Report”

WHC-SD-WM-FDC-047, Rev 1, “Functional Design Criteria Cone Penetrometer Moisture Probe”


Page A- i

Appendix A: 100% Design Review

MEETING MINUTES WHC-SD-WM-DRR-057

REV 0 Page A-1

Subject: Cone Penetrometer Final Design Meeting

TO: Distribution BUILDING 2920 George Washington Way ~

FROM: R.Y. Seda

Department-Operation- Number Component Area Shift Date of Meeting Attending

TWRS 6/5/96 19

Distribution:

Attenders:

David J. Foust WHC Mat E. Nolen WHC L. (Steve) Krogsrud WHC Mike L . McElroy WHC G. (Jerry) R. Bloom WHC Ron L. Butler WHC Lonnie D. Draper W Rosa Y. Seda WHC Geoff A. Barnes WHC Carl E. Hanson WHC G. (Nick) Boechler WHC Fred M. Jones WHC Jim H. Bussell WHC Chris G. Linschooten WHC Paul R. Deichelbohrer WHC John M. Silko DOE Kevin Kyle LLNL Wes Bratton ARA Fred Johansen SAIC

ES&Q (Radiation Control) ES&Q (Industrial Safety) ES&Q Quality Assurance Disposal Engineering Contracts Administration Operations Char. Equipment Development Char. Equipment Development Char. Equipment Development Char. Equipment Development TWRS Engineering (Electrical) TWRS Engineering (NEC Compl.) Char. Equipment Design Char. Equipment Design

Other: J.S. Schofield, WHC J.S. Lee, WHC T.R. Farris, WHC Rick E. Raymond, WHC Dennis W. Hamilton, WHC

These are the meeting minutes documenting the final design presentation and meeting. The purpose of the meeting was to present the final design of the cone penetrometer system for tank waste. package was distributed to the attenders of this meeting for independent review. Review Comment Record (RCR) will be generated and resolved after the meeting. This final design covers the design up to date. Changes associated with completion of the safety assessment will be covered at a later date.

This design covers the design of the cone penetrometer (CP) platform, which includes the support trailer and skid. trailer were built by Applied Research Associates (ARA). packages have been added to ARA's system. spectroscopy package, developed by Lawrence Livermore National

A vendor drawing

The skid and support

These include the Raman Two other

Laboratory and the moisture probe package, developed by SAIC. spectroscopy system uses its own computer and the moisture probe shares the same computer with the rest of the CP system.

The CP instrument package includes the physical properties sensors, Raman spectroscopy sensor, moisture sensor probe and tank safety sensors. measure physical parameters. pressure, pore pressure and sleeve friction. Load cells at the tip (tip pressure) measure resistance of the material ahead of the tip while side load cells (friction sleeve) measure the friction as the cone pushes into the waste. Hydrostatic pressure (pore pressure) is measured by a sensing device also located within the tip. include an inclinometer, redundant bottom detection system and side and tip thermistors. buckling. the metal tank bottom. Temperature gauges alarm and shut down at a predetermined temperature. The CP sensor package cables are disconnected after a run with a 30 pin LEMO connector. probe is then lowered into the push rod interior. The moisture probe measures moisture content and tank temperature through two B-10 lined sensors and a thermistor. acceptance testing.

The CP tip instrument package has been design to NFPA Class 1 Division 1 requirements. barriers and special conduits. A sealing flange and potting material exists between the sensor package and the explosion proof rods. rods will be tested to 500 lbs to qualify for an explosion proof housing, per calculations on maximum peak pressure. The moisture probe is contained in the CP explosion proof housing, so that the system can be used in a Class 1 Division 1 environment.

The Raman spectroscopy sensor will perform chemical speciation. The sensor is insensitive to water and operates in the near infrared area. The detection level is 0.1% in solids and liquids. It consists of a laser, monochromator, fiber optics, optics and housing with a metal brazed sapphire window. The window was chosen for its strength and chemical resistance and protrudes outward between 0 to 5/1000 inches to prevent material from clogging on the window. the Raman housing to the 1.75 inch OD rod. The sensor is potted on the top. Seals used were viton O-rings. The laser and computer are rack mounted. The 250 feet radiation hardened fiber optics will be removed at the end of a run. The optics have a 4 inch bend radius while the other sensor cables have a 6 inch bend radius. tested and load tested. A neural network will be incorporated with the computer software at a later date. with a SMA connector ( 7 ) to the monochromator for slit alignment. laser works with a 758 nm laser at 300 mV laser output. concern regarding the inner section of the raman spectroscopy housing which was made of aluminum. This section is located in the interior of the body and is not in contact with the waste.

The CP is powered by the support trailer. generator, hydraulic pump, decontamination system and hydraulic reservoir. psi, 30 mpm) and generator (800 kWatt) . The hydraulic reservoir contains up to 700 gallons. are unique as well as the 2 electrical cables.

The Ramari F ~ ~ ~ v ~ J ~ ~ ~

The physical properties package includes sensors which will The physical sensor package includes tip

Safety related sensor

The inclinometer measures inclination to avoid rod The bottom detector measures if the tip is in proximity to

The moisture

This package has undergone final design and

The sensor package is intrinsically safe by use of

The

A 2 inch adaptor connects

The fiber optic cables are fairly flexible.

The Raman spectroscopy sensor has been pressure

The fiber optic cable are aligned The

There was some

The trailer contains the

A diesel engine (John Deere) drives the hydraulic pump (300

These are 50 feet long. The hydraulics and decontamination hoses

WHC-SD-WM-DRR-057 REV 0

Page A-3 The engine can run approximately 3 days due to the capacity. changed, for decontamination purposes. the cables and hoses not being marked. design such that they are not interchangeable.

The skid weight 20 tons and can be fully ballasted to 43 tons and jacked up 4 1/2 feet high minimum to accommodate the riser adaptor and decontamination units. The skid is divided into two sections. The computer is contained in an environmentally controlled room with the Raman spectroscopy computer, laser, moisture probe calibration block and a workbench. skid. A communication system exists between these two sections as well as a clear plexiglass door. Several safety features exist on the skid. These include skid tilt, emergency stop (palm button) and leveling bubble. The legs have been seismically analyzed. These are acceptable up to a 42 inch leg extension. A trolley system exists for the 3 1/2 inch and 6 inch guide tubes. The overhead winch has 500 lbs lifting capability. clamps mechanically in the x direction and hydraulically in the y direction.

The computer system consists of monitor, computer, junction box, VXI D/A system, NIM BIN, UPS, printer, line conditioners and modem. These are contained in a 6 feet full height rack. The junction box contains the intrinsically safe barriers. The D/A system contains 22 analog channels and 32 digital channels. A battery backup exists inside the control room. There is some concern on the possible effects of the battery backup on the operator. The number of ventilation room changes will be examined to determine if the battery design needs to be changed.

Several safety features exist for tank integrity. These include mechanical means as well as alarms. Safety legs, mechanical clamps and double hydraulic clamps exist to avoid dropping the skid on the tank and dropping the guide tube and push rod into the waste. A dome load alarm exist in which the user inputs the skid configuration (ballast, 1/2 ballast and no ballast) and monitors the ram force as not to exceed the limit. Other tank safety systems include the redundant bottom detector, high tip force, depth alarms and high temperature alarm.

36 gallon tank

Other concerns were regarding These hoses and cables are

The support trailer contains a wood decking which needs to be

The hydraulics are contained in the open section of the

The x-y positioned has a total travel of 12 inches and

The basic operation of the cone penetrometer system as follow:

RISER PREPARATION

This activity will be performed prior to the installation of the cone penetrometer to verify riser availability and ensure that there are no obstructions. The inspection will provide the following information:

* Zip cord measurements to provide distance from top of the riser to waste surface and riser length measurements.

Video camera footage to provide a view of the inside of the tank and in particular, the waste surface below the riser.

*

* For 4 inch risers, the riser will be measured for diameter, ovality and straightness of the riser.

INSTALLATION

* * * *

* * * *

MHC-SD-WM-DRR-057 Install riser adapter and decontamination unit REV 0 Place skid over riser using crane (legs fully extended) Ground all equipment Position support trailer (off the tank, when possible) and connect to skid. This includes decontamination water, hydraulic lines and electrical power. Level skid Position X-Y to within 20.25 inches of riser center Ballast as required Re-level , if needed

page A-4

INSTALLATION OF GUIDE TUBES AND PUSH RODS

* * *

Assemble Guide tube to length required to reach top of waste Lower Guide tube in place with crane. clamps. Lower push rod in one meter sections.

Secure guide tube with

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND RAMAN TEST RUN

* *

* Data acquisition system monitors all safety conditions * Reach end condition (tank bottom) * Disconnect electrical and fiber optic cable from probe

Push cone penetrometer push rod into waste Data acquisition system collects data (Raman and physical properties) during push

MOISTURE PROBE TEST RUN

* * * *

* Retract moisture sensor. Remove source and store moisture

Load moisture sensor source in probe housing Calibrate moisture probe in calibration block Position moisture sensor over push rod Lower moisture sensor in push rod and take moisture/temperature readings.

probe.

EQUIPMENT REMOVAL

* Start decontamination system * Attach coupler - allow crane to lift both rod and guide at the same time. Decontaminate eouiment.

ube

* Cover with plastic containment slee've'and monitor radiat on levels using standard tank farm techniques while removing from the riser. Guide tube an push rods will be broken down such that the push rod or guide tubes in contact with the waste are disposed.

* Seal riser. * Remove trailer and skid, In reverse of installation.

TEST COMPLETION:

* * Analyze Data * Prepare report *

Remove unit to lowboy for transport

Prepare workplan for next location

The deployment of the cone penetrometer in the field date is undetermined due to funding constraints. Attached are the slides used

during the presentation. review will be independently reviewed. REV 0

Drawings submitted during the final design WHC-SD-WM-DRR-057

Page A-5 A-3000-480 (10194) G E F O l l

1. Date 1 2. Review No. -1 June 8, 1996

REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

5. Docunent Ru&r(s ) lT i t le (s )

Cone Penetrometer Final Design Review

6. ProgramlProject l 7. Revieuer 8. OrganizationlGroup 9. LocationlPhone Bu i ld ing Nurber c . ~ t p p P c r ' m 2 P ~ ? , c ~ 573- PO37

L-U U , P M 6-N 53- 1'1 Cone Pen et rome t er i h i J L ,c71h,+o:- E

12. I tem

Organizat ion Manager (Optional )

16. status

13. Conment(s)lDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the 14. Conment and d e t a i l e d r e c m n d a t i o n of the ac t ion required t o cor rec t1 resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.) Po in t

Hold 15. D ispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

ani?? 1

1 ~

I I I

1-6400-090.1 (03192) UEFOll

P o $ m w

0 m .I


1. Date

June 8, 1996 3. Project No.

2. Review No.

4. Page

I 8. organization/Group I 9. LocationlPhone


Cone Steve Krogsrud TWRS/TFP M0281/2-2302 Penetrometer

12. , i t em

I No comment I I

13. Cmnt (s ) /D isc repancy (s ) (Provide technica l j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the 14.

resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.) Point c m e n t and de ta i l ed recornnerdation o f the ac t i on requi red t o correct / Hold 15. Dispos i t i on (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n if NOT accepted.) 16' Status

L I

I m - 0

-. - L - <3

n i

g a?_ Pa& v w P

0 Ln u

A-6410-090.1 (03/92) !JEFOll

I I 1. Date I 2. Revieu No. I

3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 4. Page

5 . OocUnent Nunber<s)lTit(e(s)


9 . LocationlPhone 6. ProgramlProjectl 7. Reviewer 8. OrganizafionlGroup Bui [ding Nunber

Cone G.R. Bloom TWRS Disposal 2440 Stevens/6- Penetrometer Retrieval 0590

Engineering

12. I tern - 1

- 2

3

4

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the c m e n t and detai led r e c m n d a t i o n o f the act ion required t o correct/ resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.

The safety assessment continues to be the critical path for the cone penetrometer deployment and operation but was not presented at the design review. without a completed safety assessment.

Operating procedures need to be completed to assure operability of the design.

There is a high risk to the project design

The radiation design analysis needs to be completed to assure the current design is operable and provides acceptable radiation protection to ooerators. The ATP confirming shear strength accuracy meets specification needs to be completed before cone penetrometer delivery.

- 14. Hold Point

-

15. Disposition (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n if NOT accepted.)

The purpose of the design review was to finalize the contract with Applied Research Associates. A system final design review with the safety assessment and procedures will be completed. This would include all the systems on the cone penetrometer. The contract with ARA states that they will be providing procedures to WHC. A rough draft has been submitted and a final one will be provided. INCORPORATED. A analysis will be completed prior to the end of the fiscal year.

Before the cone penetrometer can be delivered, the cone penetrometer must first have to pass the ATP (which includes the shear strength test).

- 16. Status - 0

- 0

- 0

- 0

A-6100-090.1 (03192) UEFO11

6/14/96 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

I 1 o f 2

5. DocUnent Ntmber(s)/Tit le(s)

SKID, CONE PENETROMETER DESIGN/FABRICATION DRAWINGS

6 . Progran/Project/ 7. Reviewer 8. OrsanizationlGroup 9. LocationIPhone Bu i ld ing Nunber

17. Conment Subni t ta l Approval: 10. Agreement u i t h i d ica ted c a m n t d ispos i t ion(s ) 11. CLOSED

Organization Manager (opt i onat) Re;ieuer/Point of Contact June 14. 1990 RevieuerIPoint of contact Date

F.M. Jones h t h o r l O r i g i m t o r Author lOr ig ina tor

13. CamRnt(s)lDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f a r the :ament and de ta i led recarmendation of the a c t i o n requ i red t o cor rec t / -esolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.)

L1059-A SKID ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION PANEL iework ''SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM t o show:

-Overload dev ice f o r Sk id D i s t r i b u t i o n panel .

-Actual s i z e o f generator ou tpu t p r o t e c t i v e dev ice.

-Cable and connector s i ze .

-Cable s t r a i n r e l i e f and se ismic suppor t .

-Grounding d e t a i l .

-The DP main breaker (100 A) on the S i n g l e L ine l iagram.

-How the heaters , pumps and DP heater w i l l operates v i t h o u t t r i p p i n g t h e generators ou tpu t breaker (87 Imps).

- 14. l o l d * 15. D ispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

dHC has requested from ARA a l l these i tems.

- 6. i ta tus

0

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) U E F O l l

1 . Date 2 . Revieu No. I REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

6/14/96 3. Project No. 4 . Page

- I f t h i s i s u n f i l t e r e d o r unregulated, say so.

4 V and 12 V power suppl ies on one o f

A- 6600- 090.1 (O3/92) UE F O l 1

v u 3 I U D a w l

2% ?-&I - w o w

0 Ln U

1. Date

6/14/96 3. Project Yo.


- 12. I te, -

2. Revieu No.

4 . Page

3 of 2 13. Cwnnent(s)lniscrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the comnent and detai led recomnendation of the action required to correct1 resolve the discrepancv/problem indicated.)

-The drawings are n o t approved.

-Show seismic ana lys i s t h a t i nc ludes overhead

-Ba t te r i es ( l ead ac id ) s h a l l be vented t o ou ts ide

-(ALARA) I s o l a t i o n va l ve should be used on t h e

s t ruc tu res on the sk id .

area.

r i s e r f o r personnel p r o t e c t i o n (Rad ia t i on sh ine) du r ing setup.

m m t

PI-6410-090.1 (03 /92) UEFOH

14. Hold P,int

HOLD

HOLD

15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.)

-WHC has requested from ARA t o f i x t h e drawings.

-The se ismic ana lys i s i s conta ined i n ETS-W- 96-849, "Cone Penetrometer Sk id Seismic Ana lys i s " . The model used f o r t h e cone penetrometer i s descr ibed i n s e c t i o n 2.1 Model D e s c r i p t i o n . It was completed by F . G . Abat t , March 19, 1996.

-The v e n t i l a t i o n f o r t h e l e a d a c i d b a t t e r i e s i s adequate. change a i r 25 t imes p e r hour each ( t o t a l o f two u n i t s ) . per hour. The v e n t i l a t i o n i s adequate f o r OSHA ven t ing requi rements.

The a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g u n i t s

OSHA r e q u i r e s 5 room changes

> Th is response has not considered ALARA. The i s o l a t i o n v a l v e would be used t o c l o s e - o f f the t a n k f o l l o w i n s removal and r e i n s t a l l a t i o n o f t h e f l anse . A 4 i n c h h o l e J f lanQe m e n i n s ) i n a t a n k i s UnacceDtable.

-Before any i s o l a t i o n va l ves are used, an ana lys i s e s t i m a t i n g the dose w i l l be completed. A t a l l t imes (except when c ran ing i n t h e guide tube o r push rod o r combinat ion) , two clamps w i l l be ON a t a l l t imes on the gu ide tube and push rod. b a s i c a l l y p rov ides t h e same p r o t e c t i o n as an i s o l a t i o n va l ve . push r o d i s be ing crane i n , t h e r e should be no manual ope ra t i ons around the r i s e r .

Th i s

When t h e guide tube o r

16. Status - 0

t I ?

1 . Date

R E V I E W C O M M E N T R E C O R D ( R C R )

2. Revieu No.

3 . Project No. 4 . Page

5 . Docunent Nunber(s)/Title(s) 6 . ProgrardPro ject l Bu i l d ing Nunber


17. C m e n t S u h i t t a l Approval:

7. Reviewer 8. OrganizationlGroup 9 . LocationlPhone

Organization Manager (Opt ional )

Cone 1 John M. Silko Penetrometer

I DOE-RL/CHD/WSD I 2704HV/3-9876 10. Agreement u i t h ind icated c m e n t d ispos i t ioncs) 1 1 . CLOSED

r- Y ‘5A & JM 6&c.

.,jP 5 / K O

fZLJC* RevieuerlPoint of Contact

~

Date 7 / ~ / 9 6 Re:Lr/Poin; of contact

Date

Au tho r lo r i s ina to r Author IOr ia inator

12. I ten

1

13. Cmnt (s ) /D isc repancy (s ) (Provide technica l j u s t i f i c a t i o n fo r the c o m n t and de ta i l ed r e c m n d a t i o n of the ac t i on requi red t o co r rec t / resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.)

Guide Tube Shoe (Chisec - toothed) anchor * Consider addition of a second wiper so that a wiper sandwiches the guide tube shoe’w seal. * Benefits: Cleaner Break of seal by cone penetrometer tip; and better cleaning of sticking waste without compromising the seal (shredding) prematurely during CP withdrawal of push rod.

14. Hold Point

-

15. Dispos i t i on (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

The design was adequate for the requirements in the performance specification, which did not include a pressure setting. After the safety assessment, the pressure settings will be revisited and the system will be redesigned.

16. Status

0

REV I EW COMMENT RECORD ( RCR)

5 Document Number(s ) / T i t l e ( s )

Cone Penetrometer F i n a l Design Review

1. Date I 2. Review No

6 ProgramIProjectl 7 Reviewer 8 Organization/Group 9 Location/Phone Bu i l d ing Number

Penetrometer 2918 Cone Matthew E Nolen WTF IS M0-281/106/2-

3 Pro ject No. 4 . Page

Author IOr ig inator Author IOr ig i nator

A-6400-D90.1 ( 0 3 / 9 2 ) WEFOll 0 UI U

R E V 1 EW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

12. Ite m

1 -

2 Review No 1 Date

12 Jun 96 4 Page 3 Pro ject No

Cone Penetrometer 2 o f 1

- 2

3 -

4 -

13. Comment(s)lDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the comment and de ta i l ed recommendation of the ac t i on requi red t o correct / resolve the discrepancylproblem ind icated. )

Is t h e p o t t i n g compound approved f o r use i n an explos ive envi ronment? I E UL approved?

WHC-SD-WM-SDD-063 Page 27: Is i t ground o n l y o r bond and ground? Ref the cu r ren t tank f a r m procedures. What a re t h e f e e t s izes? (Elephant and normal)

Are the re any l o c k i n g stops f o r t h e HVAC u n i t ?

- 14. Hold Point

Men -

Men

men

Men

15. accepted. 1

The purpose o f t h e encapsulat ion i s t o p rov ide an a d d i t i o n a l b a r r i e r between flammable vapors and poss ib le i g n i t i o n sources. i n t r i n s i c a l l y sa fe . i s an accepted i g n i t i o n prevent ion method f o r Class I . Div 1 Group 8 l o c a t i o n s . This p o t t i n g ma te r ia l i s meets the requirements f o r an exp los i ve environment but i s n o t UL l i s t e d . m a t e r i a l s were approp r ia te f o r t h e tank environment ( temperature) . The cu r ren t method i s ground and bond. i s what t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n requ i res . The elephant f e e t are 18 i nch diameter (H088-6A) and t h e pads a re 12 inches i n diameter (H065-2A). The pads w i l l be on t h e e lephant f e e t a l l t h e t ime , so your " f o o t p r i n t " i s 18 inches i n diameter. No. s k i d (it does n o t r o l l around).

Disposi t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT

The sensors package has been made Encapsul a t i on ( p o t t i ng)

None o f t h e UL l i s t e d p o t t i n g

This

The u n i t i s f i x e d on t h e t o p o f t h e

- 16. Statu 5

C

- C

C

A-6400-090.1 (03/9z) wEroii

0 VI U

1 Date 2 Review No

- 12. Ite m

5 -

12 Jun 96

Cone Penetrometer 3 Project No REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

6

7 8

- -

4 Page

3 of 1

9 10 -

men

Men

Men

11

340 CFM f o r a 400 cu f e e t room. The ATP showed t h a t t h e number o f room changes per hour was 25 f o r each a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g u n i t ( t o t a l 2). Economy. The room changes i s adequate f o r t h i s b a t t e r y type . 50 p l u s ACH. None found i n t h e ATP.

12

men men Men

Men

Men

men 13

INCORPORATED. INCORPORATED, Incorpora ted . The wood w i l l be rep laced w i t h meta l .

The winch i s r a t e d t o 5,000 l b s . Vendor i n f o r m a t i o n i s be ing ob ta ined on t h e winch and t r o l l e y system. The winch i s c u r r e n t l y labe led . Inspec t ion w i l l v e r i f y t h i s . The winch i s r a t e d t o 5,000 l b s and w i l l be t e s t e d i n t h e OTP.

13 Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n for the comnent and d e t a i l e d recomnendation of the ac t ion required t o correct / resolve the discrepancylproblem ind icated. )

What i s t h e a i r f low? (ACH o r CFM)

Why a lead a c i d b a t t e r y ? NICAD?

Are there any exposed p inch p o i n t s on t h e AC r a i l s ? 3OOOpsi - secure l i n e s t o prevent f l a i l i n g Label a1 1 connectors Wood deck on support t r a i l e r needs t o be made o f metal as w e l l as t h e s take bed r a i l s . No wood i n farms. Need a l l o f t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s on t h e winch and t h e t r o l l e y system t o ensure i t w i l l h o l d what i t i s desianed f o r

Label t r o l l e y f o r load al lowed

l o a d t e s t winch

15. D ispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT 16. Statu

C 5 -

C

0

0

A-6400-090 1 ( 0 3 / 9 2 ) WEFOll

1 Date

12 Jun 96

Cone Penetrometer

R E V 1 EW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 3 Pro ject No

2 Review No

4 Page

4 o f 1

12. I t e m

14

15

- 14 Hold Point - Men

13. f o r the comment and de ta i l ed recommendation o f the ac t i on requi red t o correct1 resolve the discrepancylproblem ind icated. )

Where and how w i l l atmospheric checks be made du r ing operat ion o f t h e u n i t .

Comment (8) 101 screpancy ( s ) (Provide technical j u s t 1 f i cat1 on

Ergonomic concerns f o r mon i to rs . p l acement o f mon i to rs .

Need h e i g h t and Men

The core sample t r u c k has atmospheric checks made around t h e d r i l l s t r i n g . An i n d u s t r i a l h y g i e n i s t needs t o examine t h e opera t i on t o determine frequency and l o c a t i o n .

drawings. i n c l u d e these i n t h e drawings. No, con t ingen t t o funding. To be resolved. The design was adequate f o r t h e requirements i n t h e performance s p e c i f i c a t i o n , which d i d no t i n c l u d e a pressure s e t t i n g . A f t e r t h e s a f e t y assessment, t h e pressure s e t t i n g s w i l l be r e v i s i t e d and t h e system w i l l be redesigned.

The he igh t and l o c a t i o n were no t on t h e WHC has requested from ARA t o

Men Men -

-

0

0

0 0

-

15. accepted. )

D ispos i t i on (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT

16

17

Statu I I".

Are the re any seats t o be used?

Add a wafer t o t h e u n i t . (An a d d i t i o n a l t h i c k washer t o scrape t h e b a r r e l o f t h e probe. t h i n - t h i c k .

Thick -

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) WEFOll


Page A-18 DON'T SAY I T - - - Write I t ! DATE: 16 J u l y 96

TO: Rosa Y Seda

FROM : Matthew E . Nolen

Telephone: 372-2918 c c : H u l s e y , S

SUBJECT: Cone Penetrometer RCR

The open i tems a r e t o remain open u n t i l t h e f i n a l c o n s t r u c t i o n and OTP o f t h e p i e c e o f equipment J u l y 96 check requirements by Roger M i t c h e l l , C I H b e f o r e and d u r i n g t h e OTP The f i n a l des ign i s needed t o determine j u s t what must be done t o p r o t e c t t h e workers

The s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a re enrout f rom Rosa Y Seda as o f 16 The ergonomic concerns w i l l be reviewed along w i t h t h e atmospher ic

Matthew E . Nolen I n d u s t r i a l Sa fe ty Engineer WTFTP. EH&S


3

- 4

1. Date 2 . Revieu NO.

June 8, 1996 3. Project NO. 4. Page

1 of 1

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the c m n t and de ta i led recmendat ion of the action required t o correct/ resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.)

The ballast loads do not indicate what the total weight is and what is it filled with. water or sawdust.

Like lead,

8. Organi ZationlGroup 5. Docunent Nu+er(s) lT i t le (s) 6. PrograWProjectl 7. Reviewer Building Nunber

Cone C.G. Linschooten CED Cone Penetrometer final Design Review Penetrometer

All items that have to be carried or picked should have a weight indicated on the drawing and the part.

Are lifting loads tested like 1 1/2 times nominal loads and recorded?

9 . Location/Phone

2704HV/3-1617

Do the drawings reflect the actual (as built) conditions?

- 14. lold 'oint

15. Disposit ion (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.)

The ballast weights are fully encased lead filled A36 steel boxes. The ballast are set as 2 front ballast (15,000 lb each) and four back ballast (6,000 lb each). This information is required for lifting the ballast to install on the CP. WHC will ask ARA to incorporate this information on the drawings. This comment is in the same order as comment 1. WHC will ask ARA to incorporate this change. WHC-SD-WM-ATP-151 will be testing lifting device as follow: Critical welds shall be examined prior to and after loading the cone penetrometer t o 1.5 times the maximum operating load. Critical welds shall be identified by WHC prior to fabrication. Examination shall consist of VT and MT or PT per AWS D1.l on the final weld pass. No. WHC has requested better drawings from ARA. However, WHC level of effort drawings were not requested.

A-6400-090.1 ( 0 3 / 9 2 ) U E F O l l

1. Date

June 8, 1996 3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical justification for the

Are the electrical hook-ups compatible with the new hook-up requirements in the Tank Farm (see Jim Daniel s/Bruce Johns)?

2. Review No.

4 . Page

2 O f 1

14. Hold Point

6 Is ARA going to run the whole show or not?

7

8

9

Mechanical holding clamp on guide tube or penetrometer will it catch a falling tube? Is there a minimum waste tank level where we will be operate or not operate.

Are the dual cylinder in the system tested and do they operate O . K . like at maximum required speed.

16. I status 15. Disposition (Provide justification if NOT accepted.)

10

Jim Daniels and Fred Jones have reviewed the documentation and cannot make any conclusions. WHC has requested from ARA the documentation required to evaluate this. Assuming that there was money in the budget for operation o f the CP, ARA would be running the system with operations running the setup and shutdown of the system. Yes. Analysis has been conducted on it.

Raman system. compound get in radiation fields?

How hard or brittle does the potting

0

0

C

Yes, these are the minimum waste depth on the measurements desired: Physical Properties 8 inches Chemical Species 24 inches Surface Moisture Measurements: 32 inches Profile Moisture Measurements: 60 inches Yes. They operate at 2 cm/sec with a maximum speed of 10 cm/sec. The Raman spectroscopy assembly and associated optics have been tested f o r 17 days in a NaOH, NaN03 and NaN02 simulant in the gammaray pit. The total exposure was 350,000 Rad. The test results were that the assembly survived the radiation and chemical

The cylinders were tested during ATP.

C

C

C

effects.

A-6400-090.1 ( 0 3 / 9 2 ) V E F O l l

1 . Date

June 8, 1996 3. Project No.

REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 2. Review No.

4 . Page

12. I tern

11

- 1 2

13

14 -

- 15

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the c m e n t and detai led reconmendation of the action required t o correct/ resolve the discrepancv/problem indicated.)

Is the whole system weather protected - snow & ice and hot sun and dust. minimum like last winter. a1 1 owed.

Maximum operating temp and Max wind velocity

14. Hold Paint -

Prevent overflow of washer station in case of a lollypop on the penetrometer or Guide I Do we have a written step by step sequence of the clamping operation If the hydraulic clamping seals fail and the manual clamp is moved can the rods or tube free fall?

iow often is re-calibration of the instrument iecessary.

~ ~ ~~~


Not all components will be exposed to the environment (the control console room for example is protected since it is enclosed). The components outside are weather proof. The components are the following: control room enclosure, hydraulic ram, guide tube and push rods and associated racks and the trailer. following outside environment. Operating temperature: Storage temperature: Humidity: 10-100 % Elevation: 0 - 600 feet above sea level Exposed equipment to withstand sand and dust Operating procedures will require a camera to be installed to verify water flow and no lollipops. We only have a draft but a final version will be provided by the vendor. Yes, since you have described total failure. The preliminary safety assessment indicates a probability of 1 x lo6. clamping system is designed to have a clamp on at all time except when the safety system is overridden (for example, when craning in the guide tube, you do not want any clamps in the way). At that time, you would have the crane holding onto your guide tube. mechanical clamp will hold the push rod and guide tube in the event that the hydraulics would fail. Before insertion, the sensor package will be rpcal i brated.

These components were built to the

10 to 120 O F

-40 to 120 O F

The hydraulic

The

I - 16. Status

C

- 0

- 0

C -

J

- ,

A-6400-090.1 ( 0 3 / 9 2 ) YEFOl1


12. Item

13. CamPnt(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the 14. C m n t and detai led recornnerdation of the act ion required to correct/ Hold 15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.) 16. resolve the discreDancyIDroblan indicated.) Point status

16

17

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFOll

~ ~~ ~~ ~

The drawings need next-used on. We should be able WHC has requested better 0

Drawings need better dimensioning

to go from the top drawing to the details and subdetails parts and vice-versa.

assemblylsubassembly drawings from ARA.

WHC has reviewed/redlined the drawings and 0 requested that ARA f i x the drawings.

0 ul U

1. Date

6/24/96 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 3 . Project No.

N/A

Authorloriginator Authorloriginator

2. Revieu No.

CP96-019 4. Page

1 o f 2

12. Item

0. Organizationltroup 5. Docunent Nuher(s)/Ti t l e ( s ) 6. PrograWProjectl 7. Reviewer Building Nmber

CPO/CONE PEN. M.L. MCELROY CPQA/75820 CONE PENETROMETER FINAL DESIGN REVIEW

1.

9 . LocationlPhone

2704HV/BI22/373- 5588

2.

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the 14. c m e n t and deta i led recamendation of the action required t o correct[ Hold 15. Disposit ion (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion if NOT accepted.)

- 3 .

Status Ib.

- 4 .

resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.)

5.

Paint

Reviewed the System Design Description, WHC-SD-WM-

The ingress/egress doors should have automatic door

O . K . SDD-063, and have "typo" and questions, only. Will send marked copy for your review.

closures to control work atmospheres and the accessibility of pests.

MLM The current configuration does not have automatic door closures. This will have to be completed as an administrative control. Automatic doors pose an emergency egress hazard.

MLM In process o f completing. The procedure and custodial obligations will be similar to the LOW source.

The transport and storage, both onsite & offsite, of the neutron source must be thought out completely, ie. special handling tools, procedures, permanent storage, custodial ob1 igations, etc.

any gauges, meters, etc. must be taken into consideration for the desiqn. packaqe will be recalibrated.

account the type o f hydraulic fluid used, ie. some organic, petroleum base products may not be used over some tanks. Will drip/catch pans be used under the Cone Pen. system?

The initial calibration, and recall calibration of

The design of the hydraulic system must take into

MLM ATR will contain all sensor calibration

MLM Yes, if needed.

curves. Before insertion, the sensor

C

C

0

0

0

s I n

A;640fl-O90.1 (03192) UEFOll


1. Date

6/24/96 3. Project No.

N/A

12. I tern

6 . -

2. Review No.

CP96-019

2 of 2 4 . Page

7 .

15. Disposit ion (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.)

The wood will be s u b s t i t u t e d w i t h metal .

13. comment a d detai led recwrnendation o f the action required t o correct1 resolve the dircrepancyfproblm indicated.)

conment(s)/Discrepamy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the

As brouaht U D d u r i n s t h e meetins. t h e use of "wood"

Status 16.

0 being u;ed it, t h e d;?sign f o r eqiipment must be looked a t more c l o s e l y , i e . support t r a i l e r decking. Real ize t h e drawings were not t o be made t o Hanford Plant Standards, but they do lack some d e t a i l f o r making changes o r r e p a i r s t o t h e system. Chris Linschooten w i l l comment f u r t h e r on t h e drawing q u a l i t y .

1 4 . Hold Point

MLM

- 0.K C

, A-6',00-090.1 (03 /92 ) UEFO11

1. Date

June 8, 1996 3. Pro jec t No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

12. I tern

2. Revieu NO.

4 . Page

1 of 1

1

5 . Document Nurber(s) lT i t le(s)


13. Comnent(s)/Oiscrepancy(s) (Provide technica l j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the c m t and de ta i l ed r e c m n d a t i o n o f the a c t i o n requi red t o correct / resolve the discrepancy/problem indicated.)

Standard dosimeter will indicate a higher neutron dose than Hanford Neutron Combo dosimeters. equiping personnel around skid with Hanford Combo. Neutron dosimeters otherwise neutron doses will be high because of thermal neutrons. Call me, if you have any questions. Need radiation monitors at washer gamma and beta. Need to calculate dose rate to operator from tank.

Suggest

6. ProgramIProjectl 7. Revieuer 8. Organi zat i on1Group 9. LocationIPhone Bui l d ing Nurber

Cone JH Bussell TWRS/Eng 6/9621 Penetrometer

14. I 15. D ispos i t i on (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.) 16. s ta tus

A radiation dose analysis is being completed to determine what the operators will be subjected to. good idea. information on them?

Incorporated Incorporated

These dosimeter seem to be a Could you send me some

0

0 0

.A-6(00-090.1 (03 /92 ) UEFOl1

I 2. Revieu No. I I . Date

3 . Pro jec t No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 4 . Page

5 . D o c w n t Nunber(s)/Title(s)


6. ProgramIProjectf 7. Revieuer 8. OrganizationlGroup 9. LocationfPhone Bu i ld ing Nunber

Cone D.J. Foust TWRS/CPO/ES&H 2704HV/6-8215 Penetrometer Radiological Control

A-6100-090.1 (03192) UEFOll

12. I tem

1

0 cn -4

16. Status

13. Comnent(s)lDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the 14. C m n t and de ta i led r e c m e n d a t i o n of the ac t ion requ i red t o cor rec t1 resotve the discrepancy/problem indicated.) Point

Hold 15. Dispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

Wood deck and r a i l s on support t r a i l e r a r e a radiological control problem. The wood should be replaced with a non-porous m a t e r i a l .

Incorporated. 0

1. Date

June 8, 1996 3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

2. Review No.

4. Page

8. Organizat ionl t roup 5. Docunent Ntmher(s)/Title(s) 6 . Pragramlproject l 7. Reviewer Bu i ld ing Number

Cone Penetrometer F ina l Design Cone L. Draper TWR/TCP Review Penetrometer

11. CLOSED I? . C m e n t S u h i t t a l Approval:

,/ f / c i c n r / Revieuer lPoint o f Contact Organizat ion Hanager (Optional) eviewerlPoint o f Contact

9. LocationIPhone

2704HV/B117 2-1084

12. I tm

I Author lo r ig ina tor Author lo r ig ina tor

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the 14. C a n t and de ta i led reconmendation of the ac t ion required t o cor rec t / resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.) Point

Hold 15. D i s p o s i t i o n (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n if NOT accepted.) 16. status

, A-6lLlD-O9D.l (03 /92) YEFDll


Page B-i

Appendix B: 60% Design Review

WHC-SD-WM-DR9-05;

Page E!- 1 MEETING MINUTES REV 0

Subject: Cone Penetrometer 60% Design Review

TO: Distribution BUILDING 3250 Port of Benton Road (SAIC bui 1 ding)

FROM: R.Y. Seda CHAIRMAN G.N. Boechler

Department-Operation- Number

Char. Equipment 2/6/96 26

Distribution:

Component Area Shift Date of Meeting Attending

Attendees: P.R. Deichelbohrer, WHC J.H. Bussell, WHC C.G. Linschooten, WHC R.E. Raymond, WHC F. Jensen, MacTec G.F. Vargo, WHC J . Bloom, WHC K. Kyle, LLNL P. Gibbon, WHC G.N. Boechler, WHC J.M. Silko, DOE-RL

L. Draper, WHC M.L. McElroy, WHC R.M. Nelson, WHC J. Bajwa, WHC D. Bowser, DOE-RL C.E. Hanson, WHC T. Thomas, INEL M. Nolen, WHC 0. Jaka, WHC P. Nguyen, WHC

Other: J.S. Schofield, WHC J.S. Lee, WHC T.R. Farris, WHC D.W. Hamilton, WHC

The purpose of this meeting was to independently review and comment the design of the cone penetrometer to date. three major components. (support trailer and skid), cone penetrometer moisture probe and cone penetrometer Raman spectroscopy system. designed and fabricated by SAIC and was being installed on the cone penetrometer skid. fabricated by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The attached viewgraph describe the system in its entirety.

The cone penetrometer consists of an instrumented metal rod which is pushed into the tank waste. guide tube which provides structural support to the rod. The rod is assembled by screwing hollow sections of the rod into the tip. The basic package consists of sensors to measure tip pressure, pore pressure and sleeve friction. Load cells at the tip (tip pressure) measure resistance of the material ahead of the tip while side load cells (friction sleeve) measure the friction as the cone pushes into the waste. Hydrostatic pressure (pore pressure) is measured by a sensing device also located within the tip. The Hanford cone penetrometer sensor package includes the basic package plus an inclinometer, redundant bottom detection system and two temperatures gauges (side and tip). A proposed Raman spectroscopy sensor will be located behind the standard package for chemical speciation.

The system is compromised of These are the cone penetrometer platform

The moisture probe has been

The Raman spectroscopy system was designed and

The rod is supported by a support sleeve or

MHC-SD-UM-DRR-057 REV D

Page E ' - 2 The tank interior has been classified as a NEC Class 1 Division 1 environment. In order to fulfill this requirement, the system has been designed to meet the requirements outlined for a NEC Class 1 Division 1 environment by either using intrinsically safe equipment or housing the equipment in an explosion proof housing. barriers are UL listed. The instruments which are intrinsically safe are the tip and side load cells, tip and side thermistors, two axis electrolytic potentiometer sensor for inclination, the redundant giant magnetoresistive ratio sensor for bottom detection and the fiberoptic Raman spectroscopy sensor. the system fulfill the requirements.

The Raman spectroscopy sensor determines unknown chemical constituents via the chemical vibrational spectra. A near-infrared, mode stabilized semiconductor laser shines light into the radiation hardened fiberoptic cable. window, which provides a transparent viewing port to the waste. silvered hypotenuse right angle prism connects the optical axis of the probe window with the optical axis of the vertical penetrometer. is reflected or scattered into the waste. A small shift in frequency occurs when the molecules reflect or scatter the light. occurs when the molecule undergoes a vibrational transition at a characteristic frequency when reflecting or scattering a light wave. The input and output are collimated (the parallel light rays from the laser beam are either expanded or shrunk), with focussing of the excitation laser beam and the returning Raman signals. The returning Raman signals are collected with seven fiber optic cables and filtered through a long pass filter to remove scattered laser light. monochromater emits a range of wavelengths to the charge coupled device (CCD), which is employed as a Raman signal detector. A computer i s used to analyze the spectra collected from the CAD. Relative concentrations can be deduced from these measurements.

Instrumentation safety

A report has been issued which addresses how

The light shines into the waste via a diamond coated sapphire A

Light

The shift

A

The moisture probe changes were reviewed. final design has been previously reviewed by safety, QA and WHC engineering. capabilities to the system. For tank profiles, two B-10 neutron detectors are used while for surface measurements, one B-10 neutron detector is used. moisture measurement.

Final design details will be reviewed in the 100% design review. The final design review is scheduled for March 1996. o f the presentations.

The moisture probe system

The changes consists of adding surface moisture

Test were run to calibrate the system for surface

Attached are viewgraph

A-3000-480 (10194) G E F O l l

I I 1. Date 1 2. Review No. I REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

5. Docunent Nunber(s)/Title(s)

Cone Penetrometer 6oX Design Review

February 6 , 1996 I 3. Project No. I 4. Page

6. Program/Project/ 7. Reviewer 8. OrganizationlGroup 9. Location/Phone Building Nunber

Cone J.H. Bussel l 74430 6-9671 Penetrometer

Organization Wanager (Opt i ona I ) ~ RevieuerlPoint o f Contact Date Date , .

Author/Originatar Authorloriginator - 12. I ten -

1

13. Conment(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical justification for the iomnent and detailed recomnendation of the action required t o correct/ resolve the discrepancy/problem indicated.)

Radiat ion t e s t i n g o f Raman t o 200 kRads should be broke up i n increments t o determine f a i l u r e p o i n t .

pipe handl ing areas should be pa in ted w i t h p a i n t or-- Zoatings t h a t can be decontaminated

14. Hold point

~

- -

15. Disposition (Provide justification if NOT accepted.)

The t o t a l exposure f o r t h e cone penetrometer i s 302.4 kRad f o r 2 weeks (assuming 900 Rad/h). Pa r t s tud ies by Robert Donahoe (1994) a t LANL showed a maximum s i g n a l l o s s o f 21% a f t e r exposure t o 532.5 KRad gamma r a d i a t i o n . The darkening was due t o the fo rma t ion o f c o l o r e cen te rs i n t h e g lass f i b e r , lenses and f i l t e r s . The d i e l e c t r i c coa t ing on t h e f i l t e r s was una f fec ted . r e p o r t concluded t h a t t h e reduced s igna l assoc iated w i t h t h e exposure o f t h e i n t e g r a t e d raman probe a t 177.5 Rad/min does n o t appear t o be a c r i t i c a l f a c t o r i n t h e Hanford waste tank environment. No losses are expected d u r i n g t h e t e s t i n g , so increments o f 200 Rad a re n o t necessary. The push r o d n o r t h e guide tube are planned t o be pa in ted o r coated a t t h i s p o i n t . The clamps on t h e push r o d and gu ide tube most l i k e l y w i l l be removing any p a i n t o r c o a t i n g on these p ipes . t he waste i n t h e push r o d and gu ide tube are expected t o be disposed.

The

The p o r t i o n s which con tac t

16. status

11-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFOl1

1. Date

February 6, 1996 3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

L i -,&LL Autho r lo r i g ina to r Author/Originator

2. Review No.

4. Pme

1 of 1

12. I tern -

1

5. Docwent Nurber(s) /T i t le(s)

Cone Penetrometer 60% Design Review

6. ProgramIProjectl 7. Reviewer 8. OrganizationIGroup 9. Location/Phone Bui l d ing Nunber

Cone G. Aba t t ICF KH ETC2/6-5574 Penetrometer

A-6400-090.1 (03192) UEFO11

13. Comnent(s)/Oiscrepancy(s) (Provide technica l j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the comment and de ta i l ed r e c m e n d a t i o n of the ac t i on requi red t o co r rec t / resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.)

A crane i s t o be used f o r moving t h e CP su re led removing t h e push r o d and gu ide tube. Have t h e loads imposed on the tank by the crane d u r i n g t h e operat ions been addressed?

I

. I '

14. Hold 15. Dispos i t i on (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.) 16- Point Status

Yes, as f a r as l o c a t i n g the crane ou ts ide the tank (20 f e e t away from the tank ) .

I. Date


2. Revieu No.

February 6, 1996 I 3 . Pro jec t No. 4. Page

5. Docunent Nurber(s)/T i t I e( s 1


6. ProgramlProject l 7. Revieuer 8. Organi Zat i onlGroup 9. LocationlPhone Bu i ld ing Nurrber

Cone C.G. Linschooten Penetrometer

Author lOr ig ina tor Author lo r ig ina tor

12. l t e n - 1

13. Carment(s)lDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n fo r the c m e n t and de ta i led r e c m e n d a t i o n o f the a c t i o n required t o cor rec t1 resolve the d isc repancy lp rob lm indicated.)

W i l l mois ture probe box be weather p r o o f t o -20 F (as seen l a s t week) and t o 103F ( o r more) f o r t h e summertime, i n c l u d i n g dus t storms and snow and r a i n .

14, Hold Po in t -

-

15. Dispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

Yes, t he probe i s des ign t o operate a t temperature between -40 t o 120 O F ,

Humidi ty : 10-100 % E leva t i on : 0 - 600 f e e t above sea l e v e l Exposed equipment t o w i ths tand sand, dust , snow, i c e and r a i n .

16. Status

I

A-6400-090.1 (03l92) UEFOll

REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) I 3. Project NO.

2. Review No. 1. Date

February 6 , 1996 4 . Page

2 of 1

12. I tern -

2

- 3

- 4

5 -

~ ~

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n for the camnent and detaited recommendation of the action required to correct1 resolve the discrepancv/problem indicated.)

Bottom detection sensor. Can it differentiate between bottom of tank liner and heavy metals on the bottom o f the tank. How accurate and reliable is it?

What is the guide tube size and length o f individual pieces. How does the membrane work?

If the craft refuses to let the vendor operate, are we ready to train our own craft in time? I would like to see drawings with more practica!, tolerances. And better as-built drawings. Radii and chamfers are missing. Weld call-out full weld and part is skip welded (moisture probe drawings).

14. io ld 'oint


There are three systems used to measure the bottom of the tank. These are: depth gage, tip gage and the magnetometer. The depth gage is the gage used to verify that your push rod does not exceed the maximum depth of the tank. The same administrative controls that the core sample truck uses will be in place with the cone penetrometer (putting in only what you need as far as push rod). The tip gage measures the force on the tip and compares it to the allowable stresses based on some analysis done on the tanks (the report is over 400 pages long). The magnetometer detects the presence of ferrous metals from as far as 6-8 inches. As long as your material i s not ferrous, it can differentiate it. The guide tube is 3.5 and 6 . 0 0 inches in diameter (two sizes). The 3.5 guide tube is 22 .31 inches long and the 6.00 guide tube is 2 6 . 4 1 inches long. The membrane design has not been finalized. The membrane will be attached at the end of the guide tube and will seal the guide tube until the push rod penetrates it. The operational specification is currently being worked out between operations. We are trying to obtain better drawings from the vendor.

I

16. Status

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) U E F O l l

I


1. Date

February 6, 1996 3. Project No.

13. Comnent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical justification for the 14. comnent and detailed recomeidation of the action required to correct/ resolve the discrepancY/Droblem indicated.) Point

Hold

What i s t he d e t e r i o r a t i o n o f t he g lass lenses and sapphire lenses i n a r a d i a t i o n f i e l d ? worst case and how long?

What i s ou r

2. Revieu NO.

4 . Page

3 of 1

I

15. Disposition (Provide justification if NOT accepted.)

The t o t a l exposure f o r t h e cone penetrometer i s 302 .4 kRad f o r 2 weeks (assuming 900 Rad/h). P a r t s tud ies by Robert Donahoe (1994) a t LANL showed a maximum s i g n a l loss o f 21% a f t e r exposure t o 532.5 KRad gamma r a d i a t i o n . f o rma t ion o f c o l o r centers i n t h e g l a s s f i b e r , lenses and f i l t e r s . The d i e l e c t r i c c o a t i n g on t h e f i l t e r s was unaf fected. r e p o r t concluded t h a t t he reduced s i g n a l assoc iated w i t h the exposure o f t h e i n t e g r a t e d raman probe a t 177.5 Rad/min does n o t appear t o be a c r i t i c a l f a c t o r i n t h e Hanford waste tank environment.

The darkening was due t o t h e

The

16. Status

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFOll 0 VI Y

I I 1. Date I 2. Revieu No. I February 6, 1996

3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 4 . Page

1 of 1


1 6.. Program/Project/ I 7. Revieuer BUI l d i n s Nmber

Cone R.E. Raymond CEE 2704HV/3-3647 Penetrometer

I 8. Organ i ra t ion / t rwp I 9. Location/Phone

12. item

1

2

13. Cmnt (s ) /D iscrepancy(s ) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the 14. C m n t and d e t a i l e d r e c m n d a t i o n of the a c t i o n requ i red t o cor rec t / resolve the discrepancy/problem indicated.) Point

r Hold 15. D ispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

Delete the FeCN OQO from your design criteria list. The FeCN safety issue is scheduled for completion in May and the data needs are redundant with other DQ0s Add the "Historical Tank Content" OQO to your DONE.

DONE.

10. Agreement u i t h ind ica ted c m n t d i s p s i t i o n ( s ) 11. CLOSED

AOtharlOriginator

3

4

Please conduct a systems engineering mission analysis diagram - see me for details. I f you can increase the controlled operator What is the question?

A mission analysis is being completed.

16. Status

~~

5 Do not use lead - creates mixed waste. The lead will be poured into steel boxes, so that no mixed waste will generated.

-0

1. Date



17. Cannent Sutmittal Approval: 11. CLOSED

6e R-t/aM Organization Manager (Optional) 3/S/96 RevieuerlPolnt .r%

Date

Authorloriginator

Date

Authorloriginator

2. Revieu No.

4. Page

1 of 1

12. I tm

5 . DocMent N h r ( s ) / T i t l e ( a )


1

6. PrograWProjectl 7. Revieuer 8. Organization/Grwp 9. Locat idPhone Building Nunber

Cone G.R. Bloom TWRS Disposal 2920 GWY/6-0590 Penetrometer R e t r i e v a l

Engineer ing

13. Cmnt(s) /Discrepency(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the cannent and detai led r e c m n d a t i o n of the action required to correct/ resolve the discrepency/problm indicated.)

Hazard ana lys i s and s a f e t y assessment were n o t presented and appear t o be t h e c r i t i c a l p a t h f o r t h e cone penetrometer operat ion. These i tems need t o be acce le ra ted t o keep the p r o j e c t on schedule.

14. Hold Point -

2 The cone penetrometer s k i d weight when f u l l y loaded may exceed t h e a c t i v e a l l owab le l oad f o r some tanks. The tanks which cannot be cha rac te r i zed need t o be i d e n t i f ied.

3

- 4

The tanks t o be cha rac te r i zed by the cone penetrometer, t h e i r p r i o r i t y and the schedule need t o be i d e n t i f i e d t o assure meet ing TWRS programmatic needs. Operat ing procedures need t o be a v a i l a b l e f o r 100% des ign rev iew t o assure o p e r a b i l i t y o f f i n a l des ign.

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) VEFOll

~ ~ ~~

15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion if NOT accepted.)

Hazard a n a l y s i s and s a f e t y assessment has been completed and approved by WHC (WHC-SD- WM-SAD-032). approval. Approval da te i s expected on A p r i l 2, 1996. P r i o r t o go ing t o any tank, t h e dome l o a d i n g w i l l be examined. S t ress ana lys i s WHC-SD- DA-212 covers dome l o a d i n g ( i n c l u d i n g those which cannot be cha rac te r i zed ) . Th i s r e p o r t should be o u t once i t has been f i n a l i z e d w i t h Sha f i k Ri faey. Th is e f f o r t needs t o be accelerated. Your i n p u t w i l l be requ i red as we progress. A p l a n w i t h t h e tanks and schedule w i l l be completed by August 15, 1996. ARA i s develop ing opera t i ng procedures as p a r t o f t h e O&M manual. A rev iew copy o f t h e procedures w i l l be ready f o r t h e 100% design review.

Th is document has gone f o r DOE

- 16. status


1. Date


2. Review NO.

4. Page

2 of 1

I I

I

12. item

5

6

7

8

9

I I

13. Cannent(s)lDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n far the 14. cannent and deta i led r e c m n d a t i o n of the action required to correct1 resolve the discremncvlproblem indicated.) Point

Hold

The sensor probe instrument connector design needs to assure inadvertent disconnection during probe insertion. Radiation fields above riser need to be determined and considered in assuring operator safety during operation over tanks like SY-102 & 101 which have higher radiation fields.

Alignment procedures need to be specified for platform and alignment box positioning over riser. Steel probe contact with guide tube contact should be evaluated as a spark source.

Correlations between CPT data and rheological properties need to be confirmed before full scale operation.

The current design will be tested to verify this does not occur.

The radiation exposure for the cone penetrometer will be no more than that of the current rotary core sample truck. An analysis will be presented at the 100% design review, which will occur at the end o f March. Operating procedures will be included for these steps. This has been evaluated and has been determine that it is of no consequence (see

Further testing, in April, will confirm the properties. WHC-SD-WM-ATP-I46 will cover the tests.

ETS-W-96-447).

15. Disposit ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i c n i f NOT accepted.) I status

\

A-6400-090.1 (03 /92) VEFOll

1. Date

February 6, 1996 3. Project lo . REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

2. Revieu No.

4. Page

Author/Originator Fl 2a2.

LuthorIOriginator

1 I

12. Item

1 of 1

1 2 -

5. D o c e n t Nmber(s)/Title(s)


3

6. PrograWProjectI 7. Revieuer 8. Organization/Grcup 9. Location/Phmc Building N h x r

C.E. Hanson CEO H5-09/6-4810 Cone Penetrometer

- 4

15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion if NOT accepted.)

Th is i s something which i s be inq worked on.

13. Cument(s)lDiscrepsncy(s) (Provide technical i u s t i f i c s t i m for the carmnt and detai led recomrrndation of the a c t i m required t o correct/ resolve the discrepencylprobLm indicated.)

Need t o e s t a b l i s h contac ts on "p lugg ing" i n t o TCRs Need t o work on Opera t iona l Cont rac t i ssue

16. Status

&.-

Need t o work on "bagging" o u t procedure o f components.

minimize contaminat ion. T h i s w i l l be decontaminated and surveyed on i t s way ou t o f t h e tank. Bagging w i l l e i t h e r be completed w h i l e i t i s b e i n g p u l l e d ou t o r a t a d i f f e r e n t l o c a t i o n ( o f f t h e sk id ) . Th i s d e t a i l i s be ing worked ou t . G e t t i n g s i g n a t u r e f rom S h a f i k R i f a e y on s t r e s s a n a l y s i s t o c o n f i r m d a t a i s v a l i d . The a n a l y s i s a l ready has been reviewed by personnel t h a t o r i g i n a l l y performed dome l o a d i n g ana lys i s . It i s n o t a n t i c i p a t e d

Dome Loading.. .Need t o check w i t h TF Operat ions and assure the re i s n ' t a problem. chd

c

- 14. Hold

1-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFDll


1 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

2 of 1 I February 6, 1996 I

3. Project No. I 4. Page

12. Item

5

16. Status

13. Cannent(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n for the 1 4 . c m n t ard deta i led recornnerdation of the action required to correct1 resol vc the disc repancylorob I em i rdi ca t ed. 1

Hold 15. Disposition (Provide just i f icat ion i f NOT accepted.) Point

Need t o g e t through s e t up w i t h o p e r a t i o n s and crane and r i g g i n g and g e t r e f i n e d procedure.

Working on i t .

A-6400-090.1 (03192) WEFOll

I 1 1. Date

5. D o c m n t N&r(s1ll l t le(s) 6 . ProgranlProjectl 7. Revleucr 8. DrsenizationlGroy,


9. LocatlonlPhone

Cone Penetrometer 60% Design Review Cone Penetrometer

3 7 2 -7 7 A 7 - c

organizst ion Manager (Optional) Revieuer/Polnt of CWltaCt RevleuerlPolnt of Contact Date Oste

Author/Or i g instor Author/Originetor

I00 Y Z I w w

0 -4

A - 6 m - 0 9 0 . 1 (011921 UEFOll In


5. O o c m n t NInber(s)/Title(s) '



6. ProgramlProjectl 7. Revieuer 8. Organizat im/Group 9. LocationlPhav Building N&r

Cone P. Deichel bohrer CED 2704HV/3-2037 Penetrometer

February 6, 1996 1 3. Project No. I 4. Page

12. Item

13. Cannent(s)/Oiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical just i f icat ion for the 14. CDnnrnt and deta i led recannendation of the action required to correct/ Hold 15. Disposition (Provide just i f icat ion i f NOT accwted.) '" resolve the discrepancy/problem indicatled.) Point Status

17. Cannent S h i t t a l Approval: 11. CLOSED

RevieuerIPoint of Contact ~

Date Organization Manager (Opt imal )

AUthorlOrigiMtor

, Date

AuthorfOriginatar

1

2

3

4

5

6

Sha f t Encoder c i r c u i t s

Thermistor c i r c u i t s

You a re going t o throw away: CP p i p e t h e s t a b i l i z e r t h e t i p inst rument a t i on t h e Raman probe the c a b l e / f i b e r i n g , e t c ... f o r each tank. w i l l t h i s be cheaper than the r o t a r y mode sampling? Raman probe i n the CP i s no s u b s t i t u t e f o r l a b ana lys i s o f co re samples. How a r e you going t o p reven t t h e opera to r f rom sabotaging t h e opera t i on by p u l l i n g the i ns t rumen t cab le be fo re t h e CP i s f u l l y i nse r ted? How w i l l b a l l a s t be t r a n s p o r t e d t o t h e tank t o p ? Crane? f o r k t ruck?

1-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFOll

DONE. Linschooten t h i s m a t e r i a l and he was supposed t o share t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n w i t h you. DONE. Linschooten t h i s m a t e r i a l and he was supposed t o share t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n w i t h you. The f o l l o w i n g w i l l be thrown away: Contaminated CP p i p e ( t h a t has touched waste), s t a b i l i z e r ( t h a t has touched waste), t i p i ns t rumen ta t i on , Raman probe ( i f necessary). The sav ing o f 300K p e r ho le comes f rom no l a b o r a t o r y ana lys i s d i sposa l t r a n p o r t a t i o n , e c t . . . Lab ana lys i s i s n o t needed i n a l l tanks.

Geof f Barnes has g i ven C h r i s

Geof f Barnes has g i ven C h r i s

A d m i n i s t r a t i v e c o n t r o l s

Crane. - I

I I 1. Date I 2. Revieu No. I 3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 4 . Page

13. c m n t and deta i led r e c m n d a t i o n of the action reauired to correct/

Carment(s)/Discrepany(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n for the 1 4 . Hold 15. Disposit ion (Provide just i f icat ion i f NOT accepted.)

resolve the discrepaancy/problen indicated.)

How are you going t o ge t QA t o approve t h e neura l network r e s u l t s ?

16. itatus Paint

Th is i s t h e response I obta ined from Kevin Kyle: "Good quest ion. I n theory, we were going t o t e s t t he neura l network w i t h the h o t c e l l Raman system. The problem i s t h a t t h e r e i s now no h o t c e l l Raman system due t o l o s s o f f und ing . Simulant t e s t s w i l l be r u n a t LLNL b o t h d u r i n g neura l network t r a i n i n g and l a t e r on i n b l i n d t e s t i n g , b u t I r e a l l y c a n ' t say how t h e QA w i l l work. I'll be w r i t i n g QA i n as an FY97 t ask through CMST (EM-50), g i v i n g the work t o Fred Re ich ' s group o r Bev Crawford's group, whoever has more ready acess t o t h e ho t c e l l f a c i l i t y . Th i s year, I am s imply n o t funded f o r QA."

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) VEFOll 0 0 -4

1. Date

February 6, 1996 3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

1 2 . I ten

2. Review No.

CP96-0io 4. Page

1 of 2

1

- 2

- 3

5. D o c m n t N m k r ( s ) / T i t l e ( s )


4

- 5

6. Progran/Project/ 7. Reviewer 8. Organizatian/Group 9. Locat idPhone Building

Cone M.L. McElroy CPE-QA 2704HV/3-5588 Penetrometer

13. c m n t and detai led rec-ndatian of the action required to correct/ resolve the discrepancylproblm indicated.)

Cament(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion far the

Many r i s e r s may n o t be v e r t i c a l , o r are bent o r may have o b s t r u c t i o n s (welds, e t c . ) . W i l l t h e r e be a means o f r i s e r c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n be fo re sampl i ng? Besides t h e x-y movement o f t h e push system, w i l l t he re be the c a p a b i l i t y f o r v e r t i c a l t i l t , i f r i s e r i s beyond v e r t i c a l ? Beyond 5O?

What system w i l l t he re be f o r mon i to r i ng tank parameters, i . e . , hydrogen l e v e l s ? S.A. Requirements? The OSDs and OSRs and SA are c o n t i n u a l l y changing as tank c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n takes p lace . from these documents must be i nco rpo ra ted i n t o the CP design, i e , 30 diameters o f open r i s e r must be mainta ined f o r t ank top e l e c t r i c a l equipment. W i l l WHC per form ATP on s i t e , w i t h a l l i n t e r f a c e s be fo re sampling o f any tanks. Th is would i nc lude t e s t i n g of 0 r i n g s , procedures, sof tware and hardware.

The c o n t r o l s

15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.) 16’ I status 14. Hold Point

~ ______ ~

Yes. on TC i n s t a l l a t i o n s w i l l be used.

The l e v e l i n g system cou ld do t h i s however the rod s t reng th would be s i g n i f i c a n t l y lessened. Same as t h e Core sample t r u c k (hydrogen s n i f f e r s , e t c . )

A p l u g gauge s i m i l a r t o the one used

\

The p r o j e c t i s t r y i n g t o s tay up on the changes through Dennis Hamilton and J e f f Small ey .

WHC i s p lann ing on per forming an ATP on t h e cone penetrometer next month. i nc lude t e s t i n g o f t he O-rings, hardware and sof tware. From t h e ATP, procedures w i l l be w r i t t e n .

Th is w i l l

S I n I

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFOl1

1. Date

February 6, 1996 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 3. Project No.

2. Revieu No.

4 . Page

2 of z

bagging system in the case of decontamination failure or insufficient decontamination?

12. item

6

After data acquisition, where does the data go? Who analyzes the data and reports the findings and documents?

Will WHC receive copies and results o f a l l testing? i . e . pressure tests, push tests, chemical tests,

13. Comnent(s)lDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion far the cament and detai led recamendation of the action required t o correct1 resolve the discrewncyloroblem indicated.)

As an alternate removal scenario, will there be a

I

~

I

i",d [ 15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.) I Stat-

rod and guide tube in the event o f insufficient decontamination will

Where the data and report i s being coordinated with the people who do the tank sampling plans.

Yes, this is required.

This i s a detail which is

~

I I

A-6400-090.1 ( 0 3 / 9 2 ) UEfOIl

5. O o c m n t Nm&r(s)/r i t le(s)

Cone Penetrometer 60% D e s i g n Review


6. ProgramlProject l 7. Reviewer 8. Organ1 r a t i o n l t r o u p 9 . Locat ion lPhwr Bu i ld ing Nunber

Cone T. R. T h o m a 3 Penetrometer

12. I tem 16.

s t a t I B 13. C a m n t ( s ) l O i s ~ r ~ a n c y ( s ) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the 14. C m n t and deta i led r e c m n d a t l o n of the a c t i o n requ i red t o cor rec t1 resolve the dlscrepancylprobiem indicated.) Po in t

Hold 15. D i r p s i t i o n (Provlde l u s t l f l c a t l o n I f NOT accepted.)

Crson

Organizat ion Manager (Optional 1 t/- #. . = / k a s ,

bc/6f?& Revieuer lPoint of Contact ~

RevleuerlPoint o f Contact Date

Author lOr is lnator Author lOr is inator

I I

1-6400-090.1 ( 0 3 l 9 2 ) UEFOll 0 cn U


1. Date


2. Review No.

4. Page

5 . Docunent W&r(s)lTitle(s) 6. ProgramIProjectf 7. Reviewer 8. OrganirationlGrwp

Cone Penetrometer 60% Design Review Cone Kevin Ky le LLNL Ruilding N&r

Penetrometer 17. Comnent Stbnit tal Approval: 11. CLOSED

Date Organi zat i on Manager (Opt iml)

Authorloriginator

9. Loeat ionlPhm

510-423-3693

12. I t a

13. Cmnt(s) IDiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the camPnt and deta i led recomnendation of the act ion required to correct1 resolve the discrewncylproblem irdicated.)

Guide tube design: s o l i d waste, i n f o r m a t i o n on su r face s l u r r i e r and sludges w i l l be missed. I s i t necessary f o r gu ide tube t o anchor i n waste?

i f i t goes a l l t h e way t o t h e 1

- 2

- 3

14. Hold Point

ARA must dec ide on a f i n a l penetrometer p i p e design. The l a t e s t des ign are s t i l l under c o n s i d e r a t i o n and

Organic tanks end users would l i k e t h e t o p few f e e t c h a r a c t e r i z e d f o r o rgan ics . Can deployment i n c l u d e 1 i n c h push and h o l d i n t e r v a l s d u r i n g c o l l e c t i o n o f Raman data?

I

15. Dispasition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.)

Since most tanks con ta in m a t e r i a l s o f unknown s t reng ths , i t i s ve ry l i k e l y t h a t t h e guide tube w i l l be i n s t a l l e d . The guide tube p rov ides s t r u c t u r a l s t r e n g t h (buck1 i n g ) t o t h e push rod. The maximum l e n g t h of r o d (unsupported) which we cou ld deploy w i t h o u t b u c k l i n g i s probably 20 f e e t ( t h i s i s i n s lushy m a t e r i a l s ) . ARA has t h e f i n a l con f i gu ra t i on .

No. A 1 cm/sec push w i l l i n v a l i d a t e any r h e o l o g i c a l d a t a which has been obta ined. Instead, a scheme i n which the push r o d i s pushed and stopped (every 6 inches) can be imp1 emented.

16. itatus

A-6400-090.1 (03192) UEFDll


Page C - i

Appendix C: 30% Design Review


Page C-1 MEETING MINUTES

Subject: Cone Penetrometer 30% Design Review

TO: Distribution BUILDING 3250 Port of Benton Road (SAIC building)

FROM: R.Y. Seda CHAIRMAN G.N. Boechler

Department-Operati on- Number Component Area Shift Date o f Meeting Attending

Char. Equipment 9/6/95 21

Distribution:

Attendees: W. Bratton, ARA J. Shinn, ARA F.P. Johansen, SAIC C.G. Linschooten, WHC M.L. McElroy, WHC F.G. Abatt, KEH J.E. Kane, WHC J.K. Bajwa, WHC F.M. Jones, WHC R.L. Butler, WHC P.R. Hernandez, DOE-RL

Other: J.S. Schofield, WHC J.S. Lee, WHC T.R. Farris, WHC R.E. Raymond, WHC D.W. Hamilton, WHC G.T. Dukelow, WHC

P.R. Deichelbohrer, WHC J.H. Bussell, WHC R.L. Hand, WHC R.M. Nelson, WHC J.M. Silko, DOE-RL C.E. Hanson, WHC L.S. Krogrud, WHC J.P. Strehlow, WHC R.Y. Seda, WHC G.N. Boechler. WHC

D.W. Bowser, DOE-RL

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the preliminary design of the skid mounted cone penetrometer. Applied Research Associates (ARA) presented the design while Science Application International Corporation (SAIC) presented the operation of the moisture probe. The cone penetrometer system consists of the CPT skid and its support trailer.

The cone penetrometer consists of an instrumented metal rod which is pushed into the tank waste. The rod is supported by a support sleeve or guide tube which provides structural support to the rod. The rod is assembled by screwing hollow sections of the rod into the tip. The basic package consists of sensors to measure tip pressure, pore pressure and sleeve friction. Load cells at the tip (tip pressure) measure resistance of the material ahead of the tip while side load cells (friction sleeve) measure the friction as the cone pushes into the waste. Hydrostatic pressure (pore pressure) is measured by a sensing device also located within the tip. The Hanford cone penetrometer sensor package includes the basic package plus an inclinometer, redundant bottom detection system and two temperatures gauges (side and tip). A proposed Raman spectroscopy sensor will be located behind the standard package. The purpose o f this sensor is for chemical speciation.

. , , I .C-s?-p-y,?,-? j;

REV 21 F ' , ~ E + t - i

The basic operation of the system entails first installing the guide tube, and then the push rod. 1.00 inch hole is left. The moisture probe then surveys the tank to obtain surface moisture and temperature and moisture content profiles. Testing has been completed on both the moisture probe and cone penetrometer.

The basic operation of the cone penetrometer system as follow:

1. Riser preparation

The cable bundle is removed such that a

For test results, please contact Rosa Seda.

This is a routine activity performed prior to the installation of the cone penetrometer to verify riser availability and ensure that there are no obstructions for installation and operation of the cone penetrometer. detailed information:

*

This inspection will provide the following

Zip cord measurements to provide distance from top of the riser to waste surface and riser length measurements.

Video camera footage to provide a view of the inside of the tank and in particular, the waste surface below the riser.

ovality and straightness of the riser.

*

* For 4 " risers, the riser will be measured for diameter,

2. Installation, Operation and Removal:

POSITION SKID AND SET-UP:

* Install riser adapter and decontamination unit * * Ground all equipment * * Level skid * Position X-Y to within 50.25 inches of riser center * Ballast as required

INSTALL GUIDE TUBE:

* * Lower Guide tube in place with crane * *

Place skid over riser using crane (legs fully extended)

Position support trailer (off the tank) and connect to skid

Assemble Guide tube to length required to reach top of waste

Assemble push rod and begin cone penetrometer push (about 4 feet into the waste) Push guide tube so that it seats into the hard waste (about 2- 6 inches into the waste). The guide tube will be assembled only if a hard push (i.e., 35 tons) is required.

* Continue .cone penetrometer push

CONDUCT PENETRATION:

* Push cone penetrometer into waste * Data acquisition system collects data during push * Data acquisition system monitors all safety conditions * Reach end condition (tank bottom) * Disconnect electrical cable from probe * Conduct moisture and temperature survey

EQUIPMENT REMOVAL:


Page C - ?I

* Start decontamination system * *

Attach coupler - allow crane to lift both rod and guide tube at the same time. Decontaminate equipment. Cover with plastic containment sleeve and monitor radiation levels using standard tank farm techniques while removing from the riser. Guide tube and push rod will be broken down prior to bagging of equipment. Dispose of guide tube and push rod.

* Seal riser.

TEST COMPLETION:

* * Analyze Data * Prepare report *

Remove unit to lowboy for transport

Prepare workplan for next location

Cone penetrometer technology is at least 50 years old. was originally developed in the Netherlands for foundation design. technology has evolved since then and is currently used in environmental remediation, such as field screening. is that it provides continuous measurements in-situ. penetrometer is capable o f taking water samples (1 liter). Primary cone penetrometer measurements are sleeve friction, tip stress and pore pressure. maximum of 300 feet.

The Hanford cone penetrometer is unique in that guide tubes support the rod (for buckling purposes) and the range of materials strength is wide. The tip stress averages for sludge simulant testing was around 1 5 psi while the saltcake simulant testing was between 6,000 to 10,000 psi. The basic layout of the skid includes the control room with workbenches and the data acquisition room and a hydraulic area. The skid contains two exits and a door between the control room and hydraulic area. The control room is enclosed while the hydraulic area is open.

The hydraulic rams will be located around the center of the skid. The skid will weigh between 1 5 and 25 tons, unballasted. Ballasting weight will be placed on the skid. Steel ballast will weigh around 2,000 lbs. Lead encased in steel ballast were discussed but rejected in the meeting since these ballast would be considered mixed waste, if contaminated. The skid is 8 feet maximum off the ground.

The safety envelop of the cone penetrometer will be limited through the computer through force limitations, the bottom detection system and the length of the push rod. The force limitations will depend on the force required to penetrate the material. A maximum of 40 feet of guide tube will be used to support the push rod. automatically keep the guide tube and push rod from dropping, similar to a foot clamp. Two size guide tubes will be implemented. The sizes are 3.5 inch OD and 6 inch OD guide tubes. For a 4 inch riser, the 20 inch long guide tubes will roughly weigh 18 lbs while for 1 2 inch riser or larger, the guide tubes will weigh around 130 lbs. The guide tube use ACME threads and push rod use taper threads. These are locked in place with a pipe wrench. The thread design may be changed since ARA will be manufacturing the push rod and guide tube. The cone penetrometer probe will use no brass (material compatibility) thermistors and is spark resistance since the probe and rod and guide tube are manufactured from austenitic stainless steel. Depth i s measured through the displacement of cylinders through linear transducers.

The technology The

The advantage of this technology The cone

ARA has penetrated soil depths of 150 feet average and a

The clamps on the rods will


Page C-4 The support trailer will have a goose neck and is roughly 28 feet in length. The hydraulic pump, decontamination unit, diesel electrical generator, and water storage (100 gallons at 130F) are located on the support trailer. The unit will be within a 75 foot radius of the skid. The unit is considered to be off the tank if it i s located 20 feet away from the tank. DST has a dome limit of 50 tons (temporary loading) and SST have a dome loading of 100 tons maximum. up to 4 days of continuous run. lbs, and can be haul from its location with a 1 ton pick up truck. The diesel generator will be a 100 hp generator.

The cone penetrometer instrumentation is being designed to be explosion proof. The main instrumentation will limit energy which can be transmitted. storage unit (coil) and will be encapsulated. The housing will be explosion proof. will have safety barriers located on the top. considered intrinsically safe but it is contained within an explosion proof enclosure. charge. The issue of UL testing was discussed. testing the unit in a hydrogen chamber and detonating it. between $15,000-$20000 and takes up to 4 weeks. unit can be documented (analyzed) to prove it is explosion proof. The latter method has been chosen. manufacturers to ARA. 2 risers.

The moisture probe is deployed with a californium 252 source. This source is contained in a shielded containers. The source is installed in the moisture probe prior to insertion into the push rod cavity. Prior to entry, the moisture probe is calibrated in a cadmium lined unit. The unit reads at every inch for 12 seconds. Critical moisture content measurement is 20% and can be measured within 3%.

Decontamination of the unit is accomplished with spray wash system which discharges water into the tank. A discussion occurred on collecting the water inside another tank. shielded hoses and tanks.

The unit will be operate The unit will weigh less than 15,000

The magnetic bottom detection is considered an energy

The load cells are considered a Wheatstone bridge and The neutron probe is not

A special cable has been used to dissipate static UL testing consists of

The cost is OSHA permits that the

Jim Bussell will provide safety barrier The unit will be grounded using 2 to 3 grounds at

This concept would require the use of

The final design review will occur on January, 1996. Attached are the slides used during the presentation.

A-3000-480 (10194) GEFOll

Cone Penetrometer P re l im ina ry Design Review

1. Date

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Project No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

2. Review No.

4. Page

1 of 1

17. C m n t Subnittal Approval:

6. ProgrMPro jec t l Building N k r

Cone Penetrometer

- 12. I t e

7. Reviewer 8 . Organization/Grap 9. Locatim/Phon

2751/2-2302 L.S. Krogsrud TWRS/NSS

1

2

-

organization Manager (Optional)

15. Cnnmt(s)/Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the c m n t and detai led rummendation o f the act ion required to correct1 resolve the discrepency/prablem indicated.)

On diagram n o t i c e d a "Brass Thermocouple". n o t compat ib le w i t h h i g h PH waste. Check c o m p a t i b i l i t y o f m a t e r i a l s .

Brass i s

~~

FDC says system i s s a f e t y c l a s s 3. t h i s except i f a bot tom sensor i s used t o d e t e c t and p r o t e c t t h e tank bottom f rom puncture. maybe s a f e t y c l a s s 1.

I agree w i t h

That system

1 16. s t a t u 15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.)

The s ide temperature sensor cap w i l l be changed f rom brass t o s t a i n l e s s s t e e l . The remainder o f t he probe housing w i l l be i n s u l a t e d f rom t h e s t a i n l e s s s t e e l cap and temperature sensor by a h i g h s t r e n g t h p l a s t i c (Hydlar ) housing. This i n s u l a t i o n s a s s i s t s i n hav ing t h e sensor measure t h e temperature o f t he waste and n o t t h e probe housing. 1. According t o WHC-4-46, a s a f e t y c lass 1 i t e m i d e n t i f i e s i tems which are necessary t o p r o t e c t t h e h e a l t h and s a f e t y o f t h e o f f s i t e p u b l i c , o r t h a t prevent a nuc lea r c r i t i c a l i t y . Punctur ing the tank bot tom does n o t f a l l under t h e d e f i n i t i o n above. I am check ing w i t h t h e s a f e t y assessment group t o v e r i f y t h e s a f e t y c lass . 2. Even i f we had a s a f e t y c l a s s 1 system

P on t h e CP, i t does make t h e whole system a s a f e t y c l a s s 1 system. I

2 7aY m 25 . . z

C l - 4

n

v m

0 UI u

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEfOll


13. Cannent(s)lDiscrepncy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the cunnent and detai led recunnendation of the action required t o correct1 resolve the d i s c r ~ n c Y l D r o b i m indicated.)

12. I tRn

14. Hold Point

3

- 4

-

Any l i c e n s i n g requi rements f o r WHC t o use m o i s t u r e probe source?

Def ine opera t i ona l respons i b i 1 i t i e s . WHC-S-0241 s ta tes WHC w i l l operate


WHC i s l i c e n s e d t o handle Cf252 sources and c u r r e n t l y has several on s i t e . The ownership o f t he CPMP source w i l l be t r a n s f e r r e d from SAIC t o WHC through t h e cognizant s a f e t y o rgan iza t i on . This i ssue i s be ing reso lved through a separate operat ions con t rac t . The operat ions c o n t r a c t w i l l be p laced by March 1996. WHC-S-0241 w i l l be changed so t h a t i t o n l y addresses des ign issues.

16. status

A-6400-090.1 (03 /92) UEFOll

2. Review No. 1. Date I

6. ProgranlProjectl B u i l d i w N h r

Cone Penetrometer


7. Reviewer 8. Organizat ion/Grq 9. Locatim/Phone

Paul Deichel bohrer Characterization 2704HV/373-2037 Equipment

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Project Yo. 4. Page

5. Docunent N h r ( s ) / T i t l e ( s )

Cone Penetrometer Preliminary Design Review

17. C m n t submittal A.pproval:

organi za t i on Manager (Opti OM I )

12. I ten

1

2

13. Carment(s)/Discrepany(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the cannent and deta i led recmnnerdation o f the act ion required to correct/ resolve the discrepnny/prcblem indicated.)

Sense tip temperature of guide tube as it is pushed into the waste to prevent flammability of organic/ferrocyanide waste.

SAIC Report Page 8 NEAR/FAR ratio does not seem to be sufficiently insensitive to Boron.

- 14. Hold POint

-

15. Disposition (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i m i f NOT accepted.)

Guide cube temperature will not be measured since the guide tube will only be seated on the top of the waste (between 2 and 6 inches). saltcake simulant, the temperature increase for a 6 foot push was only 1OC. are only seating the guide tube in 6 inches of waste, the temperature increase is minimal. This question is not pertinent to the 30% design review for the platform (AM's design) but here is some information which may help you. The near-far ratio was used to try to remove the effects of the boron neutron absorbers. for a 50% level, but at the 100% level, we would have to use an empirical correction. We suggest that you contact Dan Holslin in San Diego (619 458-3715) for more details on the technique.

As indicated in our testing with

Since we

It essentially did that

I

6 . 'tatus

I 2. Revieu No. 1. Date

Sept. 6, 1995 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

6. Progren lPro jec t l Bu i ld ing N h r

Cone Penetrometer

7. Revieuer 8. Organization/Grwp 9. L o c a t i d P h m

JH Bussel l IS1 L6-38/6-9621 Cone Penetrometer P re l im ina ry Design Review

17. C a n n e n t Submittal Approval:

12. Item

1

16. s ta tus

13. Cnmnt(s)/Discrepencr(s) (Provide technice l j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the 14. c m t and d e t a i l e d r e c n r r r d a t i o n of the a c t i o n requ i red t o correct/ resolve the discrepancy/problem indicated.) Point

Hold 15. Dispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

LEL & Oxygen a la rm t r i p s should be hardwired and n o t The LEL, 02 and gaseous vapor alarms a r e a dependent on t h e computer t o ac tua te r e q u i r e d s e l f con ta ined system loca ted i n t h e c o n t r o l ac tua t i on . room o f t h e sk id . As a s e l f conta ined u n i t ,

t hey w i l l independent ly a c t i v a t e audio alarms. The u n i t w i l l a l so ou tpu t a s i g n a l t o t h e DAQ system t o p rov ide a redundant v i s u a l a larm a long w i t h making an e n t r y i n t o t h e comment f i l e o f which a larm s i g n a l e d f o r f u t u r e reference.

&61p[


7-A w w f A-6400-093.1 (03 /92) WFOll

I 5. Docunent N&r (s ) lT i t le (s )

1. Oate

Sept. 6, 1995 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 3. Project No.

Cone Penetrometer P r e l i m i n a r y Design Review

17. C-nt Subni t ta l A.pproval:

2. Revieu No.

4. Page

1 O f 1

organ i ra t i o n Manager (opt i OM! )

6. ProgramlProjectl 7. Reviewer 8. Organi z a t i o n l C r a p B u i l d i n g Nunber

Cone R. Hand DST R e t r i e v a l Penetrometer Engineer ing

J

9. Location/Phone

ETC2/373-3053

~

12. l tm

1

~~~~~

13. Connent(s)lDiscrepamy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the c-nt and d e t a i l e d recawendat ion o f the ac t ion required t o c o r r e c t 1 resolve the discrepancy/problm indicated.)

Scope statement i n d i c a t e s t h a t WCH w i l l opera te the I

I cp.

2

3

14. Hold Point

Paragraph 4.2 Data Output. I t should be made c l e a r who i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r Data t o be "Tabulated and P lo t ted " . The u l t i m a t e goal i s t o o b t a i n p h y s i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c data.

Paragraph 3.3.10 HVAC. Th is paragraph does n o t s p e c i f y exchange r a t e o f a i r .

15. D i s p o s i t i o n (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

The o r i g i n a l scope of t h e p r o j e c t had WHC o p e r a t i n g t h e CP. A separate opera t ions c o n t r a c t i s being developed so t h a t a CP vendor operates the CP. be p laced by March 1996. performance s p e c i f i c a t i o n i s be ing m o d i f i e d t o e l i m i n a t e such re fe rence. The cone penetrometer d a t a w i l l be g iven t o C h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n f o r ana lys i s . The cone penetrometer o b t a i n s p h y s i c a l d a t a (Re t r i eva l ) , mo is tu re and temperature p r o f i l e s (Safe ty ) and p o s s i b l y chemical s p e c i a t i o n d a t a (Waste Compatabil i ty) . Please r e f e r t o ECN 623986 i n which t h e a i r exchange r a t e i s s p e c i f i e d .

The c o n t r a c t w i l l The c u r r e n t

16. s ta tus

%/m/ cp

ebrd

A-6400-090.1 (03192) YET011

I I 1. oate I 2. Review Wo. 1 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

Sept. 6 , 1995 3. Project Wo.

J a s b i r Bajwa SABNE 450 H i l l s / 3 7 2 - Cone Penetrometer P r e l i m i n a r y Design Cone Review Penetrometer 1478

17. C m t Subnittal Approval:

organi ra t ion Manager (Opt imal ) oat@

&,I A L Authorloriginator

Date

Author/Oriainator

I 0 0 - w o w 0 VI -3

1. Date

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Pro jec t No. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

5. D o c m t Ymber (s ) lT i t le (s )

2. Review No.

4 . Page

Cone Penetrometer P r e l i m i n a r y Design Review

17. Cannent Submittal Approval:

6. PrcgraWPro jec t l Bu i ld ing Nunber

Cone Penetrometer

organ iza t ion Manager (Opt i ona I )

-

Revieuer 8. OrgenizationlGrokq 9. LocatianlPhone

E. Kane CSSOISafety Rad 2704HVf6-8387 Cont ro l

11. CLOSED

RevieuerlPoint o f Contact Daz/bbh5 RevieuerlPoint of Contact 7%- 45 ____ Date

Author lOr is ina tor Author lo r ig ina tor

12. Item -

1

13. Cannent(s)lDiscrepany(s) (Provide technica l j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r the cannent and d e t a i l e d recannendation of the a c t i o n requ i red t o cor rec t / resolve the discrepancy/problm indicated.)

What p recau t ions a r e be ing taken t o address r a d i a t i o n beaming f rom t h e open tank as each s e c t i o n o f t he guide tube and r o d are i n s t a l l e d .

14. Hold Point

15. Dispos i t ion (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

Two op t ions are being considered t o address the i ssue o f r a d i a t i o n beaming. One o p t i o n i s t o preassemble bo th the push rod and guide tube and i n s t a l l i n g these remote ly w i t h a crane. manufacture t o o l s which would a l l o w the guide tube and push r o d t o be assembled. remotely. Th i s i ssue i s c u r r e n t l y be ing worked out .

Another op t i on i s t o

I I ac

1 n

\ I

I O U - w - 1 3

0 m -4

A-6400-WD.1 VJ3I92) LIEF011

Cone Penetrometer Prel iminary Design Review

17. C m n t S h i t t a l Approval:


2. Revieu Yo. 1. Date

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Project Yo. 4 . Page

1 of 1


6. ProgramlProjectl 7. Revlewr 8. organizationll irwp BuiLding Nunber

Cone John Silko CHD-Sample Penetrometer Coll ection/Equipment

12. I t n

9. Locatim/Phaw

TWRS 373-9876

1

10. Agrement u i t h indicated c nt d isposi t im(s1 11. CLOSED

Date bate

AuthorfOriginator Authorloriginator

L I IO6 r w N W

0 v, -4 A,-6400-090.1 (03/92) WFOll

1. Date


Cone Penetrometer Preliminary Design Review

17. Cmmnt Subnittat Approval:

2. Review No.

4 . page

6 . ProgranlProiectl 7. Reviewer 8. o r g a n i z a t i o n / G r ~ Building nunber

C. G . Li nschooten Characterization Cone Penetrometer Equipment

orgsni ra t ion !tanager (Opt imal )

9. LocatiWPhone

2704HV/373- 161 7

12. I t e n

1

13. Connmt(s)/Discrepency(s) (Provide technicat just i f icat ion for the c-nt and deta i led recmmrdat ion of the action required to correct/ resolve the discrepancy/problm indiceted.)

Anti-Spark Materials for penetrometer

A-6400-090.1 (03192) U E F O l l

2

1 4 . Hold Point

- -

Leveling for uneven ground - How much needed?

15. Disposit ion (Provide j u s t i f i c e t i o n i f MOT accepted.)

The probe tip is be made out of 304 stainless steel, the probe body is be made out o f 4340 steel alloy (the exterior will be chrome plated or tungsten carbide plated) and the rod material is 4130 steel alloy. The guide tube will be a stee1"alloy. According to an internal memo Selection of spark resistant tube materials for use in Tank 101-SY", austenitic stainless steels or nickel-chromium alloys are acceptable to resist sparking or other ignition reactions. 304 stainless steel is an austenitic stainless steel. The other materials may have a problem with sparking but this issues is being resolved. WHC-S-0241, Rev 1 states that the CP components in the tank will not spark. WHC-S-0241, Rev 1 states that a minimum o f 2 feet of leveling travel is required.

16. status

I 2. Revieu No. 1. Date 1 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Project No. 4. Page

2 o f 1

12. I tern

13. Cannent(s)lDiocrepancy(s) (Provide technica! just i f icat ion for the CDnmnt deta i led rec-,,-jation of the action resolve the discrepancv/problm irdicated.)

How much c learance i s t h e r e between t h e ou ts ide o f t h e penetrometer tube and t h e i n s i d e o f t h e guide tube?

3

14. Hold 15. Disposition (Provide just i f icat ion i f NOT accepted.) 1'. Point status

Both se ts o f gu ide tubes w i l l have an I D o f 2.25 inches. The rods w i l l be most l i k e l y a 1.75 inch OD r o d and t h e probe w i l l have a 2.0 i nch OD. considered b u t i s n o t c u r r e n t l y i n t h e p lan.

C&w&

A 2.0 i nch OD r o d i s be ing

1-6400-090.1 (03 /92) UEFOll

Y 1. Date

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Project Yo. REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

2. Review Yo.

4. Page

6. ProgrMllProjectl Building Yunber

Cone Penetrometer

5. Doclnrnt Yunber(r)/Title(s) 7. Reviewer

Paul Hernandez Cone Penetrometer P r e l i m i n a r y Design Review

17. Cannent sutmittal Approval:

8. organization/Grap

RL-CHD

9. Locatim/Phone

376-2209

13. Cannent(s)lDiscrepency(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the cannent and detai led recannerdation of the act ion required to correct1 resolve the discrepncylproblem indicated.)

Conf i rm t h a t water conten t read ings a re m i n i m a l l y a f f e c t e d by presence o f d i s s o l v e d H2.

Authorloriginafar AuthorIOriginator

14. Hold Point


The amount o f hydrogen gas i n the waste i s es t imated t o be a maximum o f 3% by volume o r .000002% by weight. The water i n the waste i s a t a 10-20% w t % which means t h e hydrogen i n waste i s .01-.02% by we igh t . The hydrogen i n water i s approx imate ly 4 o rders o f magnitude more than t h e gaseous hydrogen. Thus t h e e r r o r f rom t h e gaseous hydrogen i s

S l i d i n g g l a s s door - c o u l d i t be e a s i l y broken? Any o t h e r m a t e r i a l s considered?

Upon decontaminat ion can t h e water be minimized, o r captured w/out go ing i n t o t h e tank . (It c o u l d a f f e c t fo l low-on Rotary Mode sampl ing r e s u l t s ) .

Check w/Operations t o determine i f suppor t t r a i l e r i s bes t as crane dependent, towable by t r u c k o r both.

The s l i d i n g g l a s s door w i l l be a w i r e g r i d r e i n f o r c e d s a f e t y glass. T h i s w i l l p revent t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f broken g l a s s w h i l e m a i n t a i n i n g s t r e n g t h and f u l l view. Th is i ssue i s being examined f u r t h e r s ince it was n o t i n t h e o r i g i n a l scope o f work. Design issues such as s h i e l d i n g and c a p t u r i n g t h e water as w e l l as p e r m i t t i n g issues a re be ing examined t o determine t h e f e a s i b i l i t y o f t h e concept. Operat ions has i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e support t r a i l e r towed by t r u c k would be pre fer red .

A-6400-090.1 (03/921 UEFOll

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Project Yo.

REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 4. Page

2 of 1

12. I tela

13. C m t and deta i led reconrnerdetiar of the action required to resolve the discreoancy/problem indicated.)

CannentCs)/Discrepency(6) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n for the

V e r i f y w/HAMTECH union t h a t ou ts ide vendors w i l l be "al lowed" t o operate t h e CPT.

5

14. Hold 15. Disposition (Provide just i f icat ion i f MOT accepted.)

Point

Th is issue i s being reso lved through a separate operat ions con t rac t . The opera t i ons con t rac t w i l l be p laced by March

- 6 V e r i f y t h a t o u t s i d e vendors w i l l n o t be r e q u i r e d t o

comply w i t h l eng thy , e labo ra te procedures t o operate CPT i n t a n k farms.

Th is i ssue i s being reso lved through a separate operat ions con t rac t . The opera t i ons c o n t r a c t w i l l be p laced by March I I 1996.

A-6400-090.1 (03192) YEFOll 0 cn U


12. , ItRn I -

1

1. Date 2. Review No.

Sept. 6, 1995 3. Project No. 4. Page

1 of 1

2

5 . Docunent NMber(s)/Title(s) 6. P r o g r d P r o j e c t l 7. Revieuer 8. Organi ra t ion/Grwp

Cone Penetrometer Pre l im inary Design Cone Car l Hanson Building N-r

Review Penetrometer

- I 3

4 I -

9. Location/Phm

ETC1/376-4810

13. Cmnt(s) /Discrepancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t icn for the c m n t and detai led r e c d a t i o n of the action required to correct/ resolve the discrepancy/problm indicated.)

Decon system.. .Discussed u s i n g "Drum P ick UP" o f waste water. Need t o f i n a l i z e decontaminat ion method and g i v e t o AM. Need t o i d e n t i f y s i z e o f f u e l t a n k f o r d iese l general (Is 4 days adequate?)

~~

I n v e s t i g a t e i f t h e r e are any p e r m i t t i n g issues w / t h i s d i e s e l generator. I n v e s t i g a t e s h i e l d i n g reqd t o p r o t e c t workers f rom "Hand Dose" w h i l e i n s e r t i n g r o d and guide tube.

A-6400-wO.1 (OJI92) IIEFOIl

status 15. Dispositicn (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.)

The performance s p e c i f i c a t i o n s ta tes t h a t t he CP sensors w i l l be i n t h e tank f o r a pe r iod o f 2 weeks w i t h o u t degradat ion. i s t o accommodate f o r any maintenance/repairs requ i red . The ac tua l opera t ion t i m e f o r t h e f u l l tank scan i s p robab ly i n t h e order o f 1 o r 2 days. day supp ly i s a conserva t ive es t imate f o r f u e l t a n k s i ze . No p e r m i t t i n g issues e x i s t f o r p o r t a b l e generator o f 500 hp o r l ess . Th is i ssue i s be ing i n v e s t i g a t e d . op t ions a r e be ing considered t o address the issue o f r a d i a t i o n beaming. One o p t i o n i s t o preassemble bo th t h e push r o d and guide tube and i n s t a l l i n g these remote ly w i t h a crane. t o o l s which would a l l o w t h e gu ide tube and push r o d t o be assembled remotely.

Th is

A 4

Two

Another op t i on i s t o manufacture

I REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR)

I

-34.2. orgsnization Manager (optionel)

Date

Authorloriginator

1. Date 2. Review No.

Sept. 6 , 1995 cPq5-014 3. Project No. 4 . Page

1 of 1

- 12. Item

5. Oocunent Nurlxr(s)llitle(s) 6. PrograNProjectl 7. Revieuer 8. OrganiiationlCrolp

Cone Penetrometer Preliminary Design Cone M.L. McElroy CPQA Building Nm&r

Rev i ew Penetrometer

1

9. LocationIPhon

2704HV/3-5588

2

3 -

13. Cannent(s)loiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical justification for the cannent and detailed recannerdation of the action required t o correct1 resolve the discrepancylproblem indicated.)

Noticed that a teflon filter and brass sensor unit will be used in probe design - these materials are questionable when used in organic/H2 atmospheres.

For the program, state permitting may be needed to be addressed; i.e. EPA permits for diesel power opera t i on. Who or what organization will analyze the end data?

A-A400-090.1 (03 /92 ) UEfOll

15. Dispsition (Provide justification if NO1 accepted.)

The side temperature sensor cap will be changed from brass to stainless steel. remainder of the probe housing will be insulated from the stainless steel cap and temperature sensor by a high strength plastic (Hydlar) housing. This insulation assist in having the sensor measure the temperature of the waste and not the probe housing. The standard pore pressure filter material consist of polyethanlene (sp) plastic material. The viewgraph was incorrect in stating teflon. We can change this to a sintered metal (stainless steel) filter if required. No permitting issues exist for portable generators with less than 500 hp.

The

Characterization.

16. status

1. Date 2. Revieu No.

Sept. 6, 1995 REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 3. Project No. 4 . Page

2 of 1 - 12. I t e m 15. Disposition (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion I f NOT accepted.)

The skid system is designed strictly for in- situ testing of the tank waste material and not sampling. retrieved with the unit and therefore organic materials will not encounter the decking material. The aluminum decking will not experience the same loads (rotating) that the core sample truck experiences. The design has yet to be finalized (bolting vs welding the deck on the skid) but your comment is being considered.

No tank material will be

4

status 16.

C~US~,

13. Conmnt(s)/Discrepency(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the c a n t and deta i led r e c m r d a t i o n of the action required t o correct/

Point

cracking of welds and materials has been a problem. Also, any organic spill on aluminum will cause toxic fumes and deterioration of the aluminum, as per 101- SY study.

I

1-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFOll

1. Date


Cone Penetrometer Preliminary Design Rev i ew

17. C~mnent S L h i t t a l Approval:

2. Revieu No.

4. Page

1 O f 1

organizat ion nanager (Optional 1

6. ProgranVProject l 7. Revleuer 8. organi zat i o n l t r o u p Bu i ld ing Nrnber

Cone f / v ~,-JZ, c > j A 4 H C . z,.&<- Penetrometer

CJ - 6-73- --?/?-I Revi.ewerlPoint <e/ o f Contact

Date

AuthorIOriginator

Date

Author lo r is ina tor

9. LocationlPhone

s+ . 373 - / L L F

I-

e P - -

-WM-DRR-057 tEV 0 le C-21

1. Date I 2. Revieu NO.

3. Project No. I REVIEW COMMENT RECORD (RCR) 6. Page

5. Docment Ntmher(s)lTitle(s)

Review o f Cone Penetrometer, DOT-7A Type A Package Documentation Received

6. P r w r W P r o j e c t l 7. Revieuer 8. Organiratim/Crwp 9 . Location/Phm Building NMber

0 . L. K e l l y PO&D/84400 MO-404/1100 Area 372-2276

12. I tR - 1.

2.

-

13. cannent and detai led recannendation of the action required t o correct/ resolve the discrewancylproblm indicated.)

Cann=nt(s)/Discrepeancy(s) (Provide technical jus t i f i ca t ion for the

General Comment: Documentation f rom t h e Mounds document (MLM-3245) i s s u p p l i e d f o r t h e DOT-17C, 5-gal drum as being approved as a DOT-7A Type A package. The documentation re fe rences t e s t i n g and e v a l u a t i o n methodology t h a t was used; however, t he appendices f rom t h e Mounds document were n o t i nc luded f rom t h e manufacturer . How does t h e sh ipper know t h a t t h e r e g u l a t o r y performance requi rements o f t h i s packaging have been met? Mounds document, Page A-8, t h e l a s t b u l l e t o f t he "Rest r ic t ions /Spec i f ica t ions" s e c t i o n s t a t e s t h e f o l l o w i n g , "The sh ipper must determine t h a t t h e a c t u a l con ten ts are c l o s e l y s imulated by t h e t e s t contents . I f t h i s i s n o t t rue , t e s t i n g l a n a l y s i s must be conducted and documented t o demonstrate Spec 7A compliance w i t h the a c t u a l contents . " S ince t h e appendices have n o t been prov ided, how can t h e sh ippe r determine i f the t e s t con ten ts and ac tua l con ten ts be ing shipped a re s i m i l a r ?

- 14. Hold Point -

15. D i s p r i t i o n (Provide jus t i f i ca t ion i f NOT accepted.)

F r o n t i e r has c e r t i f i e d t h e con ta ine r as approved by DOT as DOT-7A Type A. The appendices f rom the Mound Labs t e s t document have been requested from F r o n t i e r .

The source i s a 10 microgram c a l i f o r n i u m 252 spec ia l form source. The c a v i t y a t t h e cen te r o f t h e drum w i l l c o n t a i n the source and source h o l d e r which w i l l o n l y weigh a few ounces. The F r o n t i e r Technology Radioact ive Shipping Cask C e r t i f i c a t e c e r t i f i e s t h e drum f o r r a d i o a c t i v e m a t e r i a l s w i t h 3 forms: 1) Solids-any p a r t i c l e s i z e 2) So l i ds - l a rge p a r t i c l e s i z e o n l y (sand, concrete, deb r i s , s o i l , e t c ...) 3) S o l i d s - o b j e c t s w i t h no s i g n i f i c a n t d i s p e r s i b l e o r removable contamination. The source f i t s t h e d e s c r i p t i o n o f 3 ) .

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFDll ..

I u x 1

0 VI U


1. Date

9/6/95 3. Project Yo.

2. Reviw No.

4 . Page

12. I ten - 3 .

- 4.

- -

13. Cannent(s)/Oiscrepancy(s) (Provide technical j u s t i f i c a t i o n for the cannent and deta i led r e c d a t i o n of the action required to correct/ resolve the discrepancv/Droblem indicated.)

General Comment: Upon my rev iew o f t h e Mounds document, i t was found t h a t t h e ac tua l contents used f o r t e s t i n g the DOT-l7C, 5-gal drum were f l o u r , f l uo resce in , sand, and lead. These t e s t contents d i f f e r s i g n i f i c a n t l y f rom t h e ac tua l con ten ts be ing shipped. There i s no t e s t o r e v a l u a t i o n documentation i nc luded i n t h e manufacturer 's i n fo rma t ion t o suppor t t h a t t h e con ten ts be ing shipped would s u r v i v e any o f t he DOT-7A Type A t e s t s . Drawing A50240-MOO: Wi th t h e 3-4 i n c h head space i n the drum, i t appears t h a t i f t h e drum were dropped f l a t onto t h e t o p l i d , t h e r e would be a chance t h a t t he s t e e l p i p e would ram i n t o t h e drum l i d , damaging the packaging s i g n i f i c a n t l y . Also, i t i s n o t known how t i g h t l y t he plywood/masonite spacers f i t around t h e p i p e t o d e t e r s h i f t i n g o f contents. The performance o f t h e WEP m a t e r i a l i s n o t known.

Page A-8, " R e s t r i c t i ons/Speci f i c a t i ons, " s ta tes : The sh ipper must assure t h a t t he con ten ts a re secure ly fastened and p o s i t i o n e d w i t h i n t h e package. Each sh ipper must assure t h a t t h e r a d i a t i o n l e v e l a t the su r face o f t h e package w i l l n o t i nc rease by more than 20 percent .

14. Hold Point

~

15. Disposition (Provide j u s t i f i c a t i o n i f NOT accepted.)

As t h e weight o f t h e source f a l l s w i t h i n t h e spectrum o f t he weights tes ted , t he package w i l l n o t be a f f e c t e d by t h e source. We are n o t aware o f any requi rement t h a t t h e ac tua l source be inc luded i n t h e sh ipp ing con ta ine r t e s t s . The source t r a n s p o r t a b i l i t y i s c e r t i f i e d separate ly by DOT.

The p i p e shown i n Drawing A50250-MOO w i l l n o t ram the upper l i d . Th i s p i p e i s f i x e d i n t h e drum w i t h t h e WEP c a s t i n place, which a l so holds t h e spacers i n place. p i p e should remain i n p lace. The WEP m a t e r i a l surv ived t h e drop t e s t .

The

16. status

A-6400-090.1 (03/92) UEFOll


Page C-24 Author: Donna L Kelly at -WHC3 Date: 10/2/95 9:30 AM Priority: Normal subject: Re: RCR

Message contents .................................... ____________________________________ Thank you for getting back to me. time to get back to you--between classes and travel, I just haven't been here.

The RCR is acceptable to me, and I have no further comments. receive the requested information from Frontier, and are satisfied with their evaluation/test documentation, and have this documentation for your files, you should be covered.

I'm sorry that it has taken me quite some

As long as you

Donna

Reply Separator Subject: RCR Author: Rosa Y Seda at -WHC131 Date: 9/21/35 3:56 PM

Donna, the attached RCR is for the 30% design review for the cone penetrometer. Your conunents were not necessarily pertinent to the design review (it only covered the rig, not the moisture probe ... we have already done a 90% design review on the moisture probe) BUT I went ahead and asked SAIC to resolve your comment. Attached is a copy of the RCR with your comments and their resolution. Please review the RCR and sign-off if you agree with them. If you are not satisfied, we will set up a meeting with you, Characterization Equipment Development and SAIC (they are here about twice a month) to resolve the issues once and for all.

Rosa

engineering data transmlltal cot/67531/metadc703071/... · 1 cot 14$822 engineering data...

Documents